Jan 16, 2015
This presentation was provided by
Monica Goetz Rasha Proctor Jojaine SeguraLetitia Gutierrez Adrian Bretato
Digital Media Management-MBA students
St.Edwards University
Austin, TX
Thanks to all the great resources that allowed us to put togetherthis project and learn all about HMTL5. Some of these resourcesare:
Focus.com, W3.org, Facebook.com, Att.com, Mashable.com,DaleStephanos (image), Petter Lubbers and others.
Agenda
• Brief background on HTML 5
• Explain HTML 5
• Mobile and business players
• Address HTML 5 vs. Flash debate
• Developer Perspective and User Experience
• Current status and future developments
Brief Background• Core HTML had not been updated since 2000
• 2004 WHATWG presented evidence that HTML could be improved
• W3C adopted HTML 5 and supports WHATWG
• Google’s Ian Hickson editing the HTML 5 standards
• January W3C announced last call for comments May 2011
What makes HTML5 special?1. Conformity:
• Standardization of documentation and implementation methods 2. Compatibility:
• Forward, backward and current content• Avoid reinventing the wheel
3. Utility: • End users are #1 priority, not sponsors or organizations. • Separation of content and presentation (Growing CSS)
4. Interoperability:• Specify well defined behavior• Abandon complexity for simplicity
5. Universal access:• Support for all world languages• Open accessibility
Browser Compatibility
1/ 20111/ 2011
6/20106/2010
2/20112/2011IE 9.0 crows for HTML5 compatibilityIE 9.0 crows for HTML5 compatibility
• “The popularity of mobile devices will change,” he said implying that the dominant devices today might not be so dominant in the future. “We want to be consistent on the web and on mobile.”
--Bret Taylor, CTO
• "You purchase an app for one operating system, and if you want it on another device or platform, you have to buy it again," he said. "That's not how our customers expect to experience this environment.“
-- Randall Stephenson, CEO
Words for Thought…
HTML5 & Mobile Devices– Why?
• Portability – the device no longer matters. Only the app does.
• Easier adaptation to market changes.
• Reduction of development time/expense – Apps only have to be coded once.
• Proprietary vs. Open Source – Plug-ins no longer required to run apps or videos.
• Ease of development
Flash vs. HTML5
Do they compete??
Cost efficient
Advanced Effects
Universally Accepted
Efficiency
Apples 2 Oranges...
Can they really compare?
What is my best bet?
It depends…
function
FunctionIntegration“Write once – run everywhere”Simple is betterContent Indexing
ExperienceImmersive, engaging visualsDirect the user’s attentionUnparalled first impressionStorytelling
5 Questions to Ask:1.Is search engine traffic important to my business?2.How are the majority of my customers accessing the site?3.How important is the user experience?4.How often will it need to be updated?5.How much content do I have?
FunctionFunction
ExperienceExperience
Current Status and FutureCurrent Status and Future• Working draft phase
• Formalized standards by 2014
• Developers create one application can be used across platforms
• Future is wide open for mobile devices
• Potential game changer for how mobile video is consumed
• End of January Google announced YouTube will support video played with HTML 5
Questions?