Top Banner
What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH July 18, 2011
17

What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Jan 13, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based

Prevention Candidate?

Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D.Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH

July 18, 2011

Page 2: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Controlling and Ultimately Ending the HIV/AIDS Pandemic

Aggressively “seek, test and treat” infected individuals

Prevent new infections “Cure” existing infections

Page 3: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,
Page 4: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,
Page 5: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,
Page 6: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

FEM-PrEP HIV Prevention Study

Phase II trial testing effectiveness of oral Truvada among

HIV-uninfected women The Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC)

advised that the study reached futility Conducted in Kenya, South Africa and Tanzania Funded by USAID, with early support from

Gates Foundation Conducted by Family Health International Full data (including drug levels) will be available later this

year

Page 7: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

July 13, 2011

Landmark Study Finds Antiretroviral Drugs Highly Effective at Preventing HIV in Both Men

and Women

CDC Trial and Another Major Study Find PrEP Can Reduce Risk of HIV Infection Among

Heterosexuals

July 13, 2011

Page 8: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,
Page 9: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

VOICE: Vaginal & Oral Interventions to Control the Epidemic

Objectives: Estimate the effectiveness of daily tenofovir 1% gel, oral

TDF, and oral FTC/TDF in preventing HIV in women Evaluate the extended safety of daily tenofovir 1% gel,

oral TDF, and oral FTC/TDF in preventing HIV in women Evaluate adherence and acceptability to the daily

vaginal and oral regiments Assess the selection of HIV-1 drug resistance in women

acquiring HIV-1 in the study

Page 10: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

VOICE Study Design

Oral TDF

Oral Truvada

Oral Placebo

1% Tenofovir Gel

Placebo Gel

3:2

1:1:1

1:1

5000 women, 1000 in each group

Oral Arm

Topical Arm

Page 11: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

iPrEX OLE and San Francisco PrEP Demonstration Project

iPrEX Open Label Extension Study: Assessing adherence, drug levels and risk taking in a well-characterized cohort of trial participants after they are informed regarding the safety and efficacy of FTC/TDF PrEP and offered free open-label dosing

San Francisco PrEP Demonstration Project: Evaluating acceptability, uptake and adherence to daily PrEP among high-risk MSM in non-research settings and assessing risk behaviors before and after access to PrEP

Page 12: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Additional PrEP Trials

HPTN 066: Phase I, randomized, open label, pharmacokinetic study to describe the dose-proportionality and intra-individual variability of tenofovir diphosphate and emtricitabine triphosphate at steady-state in healthy volunteers taking Truvada

HPTN 067: Phase II, randomized, open label, pharmacokinetic and behavioral study of the use of intermittent oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate PrEP

HPTN 069: Phase II, randomized, double-blind, controlled four arm study of the safety, tolerability and adherence of maraviroc, maraviroc + emtricitabine, maraviroc + tenofovir, or tenofovir/emtricitabine for PrEP to prevent HIV in at-risk MSM (co-sponsored with the AIDS Clinical Trials Group)

Page 13: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Additional Microbicide Trials

CHOICE – Emerging from VOICE Dapivirine ring study, MTN 020 MTN-013 – Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics of

dapivirine/maraviroc intravaginal ring Tenofovir safety studies in special populations

Page 14: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Next Steps – ARVs as Prevention

Page 15: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Next Steps for PrEP and Microbicides

Adjust VOICE based upon Partners PrEP outcomes– Move 1% Tenofovir gel to licensure– Sensitivity to adherence of the activity of PrEP for heterosexual

transmission

Continue development of rectal microbicides Define role of current products in comprehensive

prevention packages Define adherence strategies, delivery systems, and

approaches to social marketing

Page 16: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

The Dynamic Tension in the Prevention Field

Given the efficacy of treatment as prevention, what is the future niche for PrEP and microbicides in comprehensive prevention?

Do we seek to optimize what we have shown to be effective or do we seek a better next generation? – Current products are strikingly behaviorally dependent—

adherence is a significant issue.

Can long acting formulations be devised—improving both treatment outcomes as well as prevention– Rings, implants, injectibles, long acting oral formulations

Page 17: What Is Currently in the Pipeline & What is Ideal for an ARV-based Prevention Candidate? Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D. Director, Division of AIDS, NIAID,

Optimistic, Long Range Vision

The therapeutic armamentarium will continue to improve with development and roll out of ART requiring 4-12 doses per year

PrEP would then also require 4-12 doses a year These would be tools that can control and start

ending the HIV pandemic