What Do We Expect Students to Learn? Title I School Improvement Coordinators Erin Sullivan & Gail Varney WVDE Title I Coordinators Deconstructing 21 st Century CSOs
Mar 27, 2015
What Do We Expect Students to Learn?
Title I School Improvement CoordinatorsErin Sullivan & Gail VarneyWVDE Title I Coordinators
Deconstructing 21st Century CSOs
Session Goals
Understand the change in the rigor and relevance of the revised CSOs.
Participate in a process of deconstructing the CSOs that ensures teachers understand the depth of knowledge and what reasoning and skills students will be expected to master.
Understand that the deconstructed CSOs form the basis of designing assessments and selecting appropriate instructional strategies.
Three Ways to Improve Student Learning
Raise the level of rigor in the content standards and objectives.
Increase the skill and knowledge of teachers in teaching the content.
Engage students in active learning designed around the standards for content, learning skills and technology tools.
The Rigor/Relevance Framework
AAcquisition
BApplication
CAssimilation
DAdaptation
KNOWLEDGE
TAXONOMY
6
5
4
3
2
1
Evaluation
Synthesis
Analysis
Application
Understanding
Awareness
APPLICATION MODEL
1 2 3 4 5
Knowledge Apply indiscipline
Apply across
disciplines
Apply toreal world
predictable situations
Apply to real-world
unpredictable situations
RLA CSO Comparison – Grade 4
Previous Policy
RLA.4.1.11 Summarize the author’s purpose (e.g., to persuade; to inform; to determine a specific viewpoint).
Revised Policy
RLA.O.4.1.09 Determine author’s purposes in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent:To persuadeTo entertainTo informTo determine a specific
viewpoint
Mathematics CSO Comparison - Grade 3
Previous Policy
MA.3.1.6Compare and order fractions with like and unlike denominators using concrete models.
Revised PolicyM.O.3.1.6
Create concrete models and pictorialrepresentations to
• compare and order fractions with like and unlike denominators,
• add and subtract fractions with like denominators, and verify results.
What is Depth of Knowledge?
The degree of depth or complexity of knowledge reflected in the content standards and assessments
How deeply a student needs to understand the content for a given response/assessment
Depth of Knowledge Levels
Level 1: RecallRecall, recognition; skill, behavior or sequence of behaviors learned through practice and easily performed
Level 2: Skill/ConceptEngagement of some mental processing beyond recalling; the use of information or conceptual knowledge; requires making some decisions regarding how to approach a question or problem
Level 3: Strategic Thinking More sophisticated reasoning and analysis; deep understanding; students are required to solve problems & draw conclusions
Level 4: Extended ThinkingRequires integration of knowledge from multiple sources and ability to represent knowledge in a variety of ways; usually requires work over an extended period of time
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
DOK is about intended outcome, not difficulty.
DOK is a reference to the complexity of mental processing that must occur to answer a question, perform a task, or generate a product.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Words like explain or analyze have to be considered in context. “Explain to me where you live” does not
raise the DOK of a simple rote response. Even if the student has to use addresses
or landmarks, the student is doing nothing more than recalling and reciting.
Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Difficulty is a reference to how many students answer a question correctly:
How many of you know the definition of exaggerate? DOK 1 - recall
If all of you know the definition, this question is an easy question.
How many of you know the definition of prescient? DOK 1 - recall
If most of you do not know the definition, this question is a difficult question.
Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education
Activity: Determining DOK Level
DOK ? Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks
DOK ? Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks.
DOK ? Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle.
Practice Activity: Sample One
Locate and interpret key information in illustrations, titles, chapter headings, glossaries and maps to answer questions.
Practice Activity: Sample Two
Solve one-step linear equations and inequalities with one variable, interpret the solution or solutions in the context from which they arose, and verify the reasonableness of the results.
Practice Activity: Sample Three
Design a statistical experiment to study a problem and communicate the outcomes.
No longer will teachers be able to “check off” CSOs as being “covered” in one class period.
Where do we begin?
Deconstructing the Standards is…
…a systematic process to identify embedded learning targets in standards and objectives so that nothing essential is missed during instruction.
Learning Targets
What students should know, understand and be able to do to master the standards/objectives
We Need Clear Targets to. . .
Correctly identify what students know and don’t know
Select appropriate assessments Plan effective instruction Keep track of student learning target by
target or standard by standard Have students self-assess or set goals
likely to help them learn more
Types of Learning Targets
Knowledge knowing and understanding facts and concepts learned outright or via reference
Reasoning mental processes we want students to engage in USING knowledge to solve problems
Performance Skills process is most important
Products using knowledge, reasoning, and skills to create a
product
Product ObjectiveProduct
Performance Skill
Reasoning
Knowledge
Performance Skill ObjectivePerformance Skill
Reasoning
Knowledge
Reasoning ObjectiveReasoningKnowledge
Knowledge ObjectiveKnowledge
Examples: Knowledge Targets
Identify sight wordsIdentify similes and metaphorsKnow defining characteristics of
various literary genresCount and group concrete
manipulatives by ones, tens, and hundreds to 1,000
Examples: Reasoning Targets
Make a prediction based on evidenceDistinguish between fact and opinionEvaluate information from a variety of
resourcesClassify and compare triangles by
sides and angles
Examples: Performance/Skill Targets
Read aloud with fluency and expression
Use self-correction strategiesUse inductive reasoning to find and
justify the laws of exponents with numeric bases
Model, identify and describe square, prime and composite numbers
Examples: Product Targets
Produce a grammatically correct sentence
Develop a proper paragraph form in a written composition
Compose a written composition using the five-step writing process
Create a design with more than one line of symmetry
Deconstruction Steps
Choose a standard/objective for which the embedded learning might not be consistently identified.
Identify its ultimate type: knowledge, reasoning, performance skill, or product.
Ask four questions: What knowledge do students need ? What reasoning proficiencies (if any) do students
need? What performance skills (if any) do students need? What products (if any) do students need to practice?
Step OneStandard/Objective:
Step Two
Type: Knowledge Reasoning Performance Skill Product
Learning TargetsWhat are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning this
objective?
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
Performance Skill Targets
Product Targets
What must students know to master this standard?
How are students using knowledge to solve a problem, make a decision, form a plan, etc.?
What must students be able to do ? How are they using knowledge and reasoning to perform a task?
What are students asked to produce or create?
Step Three
Activity: Learning Target Verb Sort
Categorize verbs under correct learning target headings:
• Knowledge• Reasoning• Performance Skill• Product
Knowledge Reasoning Performance Product
Explain Predict Observe Design
Understand Infer Perform Produce
Describe Classify Do Make
Identify Compare Conduct Write
Define Summarize Speak Draw
Recall Analyze Operate Represent
Recognize Evaluate Investigate Display
Select Generalize Collect Model
Tips for Deconstructing the CSOs
Analyze the wording of the standard/objective to determine key concepts and key skills• Read through indicators• Circle verbs to identify key skills• Underline nouns and noun phrases to identify key
concepts
Example M.O. 3.1.14: Create grade-appropriate real-world problems involving
any of the four operations using multiple strategies, explain the reasoning used, and justify the procedures selected when presenting solutions.
How Many Types of Learning Targets?
EXAMPLE 1: 8th Grade Reading/L.A., RLA.O.8.1.5
Use pre-reading and comprehension strategies (e.g. generating questions and previewing, activating and evaluating prior knowledge and scanning or skimming texts) to critically analyze and evaluate the comparison of literary and informational texts for• Making judgments• Hypothesizing• Making complex or abstract summaries
How Many Types of Learning Targets?
EXAMPLE 2: Grade 3 Mathematics, M.O.3.5.1
Collect and organize grade-appropriate real-world data from observation, surveys, and experiments, and identify and construct appropriate ways to display data.
Activity
Let’s deconstruct one together!
Standard/Objective: RLA.O.4.1.9 Determine the author's purpose in literary and informational text and use supporting material to justify the author’s intent to persuade, entertain, inform and determine a specific viewpoint.
Type: Knowledge
Reasoning
Performance Skill
Product
Learning TargetsWhat are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning this
objective?
Knowledge Targets
What must students know?
Reasoning Targets
How are students using knowledge to
solve a problem, make a decision, etc.?
Performance Skill Targets
What must students be able to do? How
are they using knowledge and
reasoning to perform a task?
Product TargetsWhat are students
asked to produce or create?
Standard/Objective: RLA.O.4.1.9 Determine the author's purpose in literary and informational text and use supporting material to justify the author’s intent to persuade, entertain, inform and determine a specific viewpoint.
Type: Knowledge
Reasoning
X Performance Skill
Product
Learning TargetsWhat are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning this
objective?
Knowledge Target Reasoning Targets Performance Skill Targets
Product Targets
Identify main ideaIdentify supporting details.Understand the meaning of persuade, entertain, & inform.Identify the 2 types of writing (informational & narrative)Understand why authors write.Understand the concept of compare/contrast.Understand summarization techniques.
Compare and contrast two types of reading genresDraw a conclusion about author’s purpose by identifying words in text to justify the intent.Draw a conclusion about author’s pt. of view based on key words in text.
Use supporting materials to justify the author’s purpose.
Your Turn to Deconstruct
1. Divide into teams.2. Choose one standard/objective that
everyone in the group will tackle.3. Each group deconstructs the chosen
standard/objective.4. Groups compare learning targets and come
to consensus.
Choose a CSO to Practice Deconstructing
Estimate, measure, compare, order and draw lengths of real objects in parts of an inch up to 1/8 of an inch and millimeters. (M.O.5.4.1)
write to persuade using order of importance, classifying differences and similarities, classifying advantages and disadvantages. (RLA.O.4.2.6)
use examples, and details in practical texts to make inferences and logical predictions about outcomes of procedures in such texts. (RLA.O.7.1.10)
QUESTIONS?????