WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - IN.gov Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: W SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 21 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >24 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >24 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Series Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 24 1 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

S. CarlsonLa PorteIndianaW-504b1u

na

Upgradient from wetland; soils are sandy and therefore naturally problematic

- Local Relief: - -

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

upland

------

Remarks: --

--

----

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

-Tracy sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

sandColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeS. Kraszewski

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

04/13/12

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-504b 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 10 Y FAC2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

10 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 50 x 3 = 150

FACU spp. 20 x 4 = 80

1. 15 Y FAC UPL spp. 20 x 5 = 100

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 90 (A) 330 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.667

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

15 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 5 N FAC2. 20 Y FACU3. 20 Y NI4. 20 Y FAC5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

65

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

Allium canadense

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

60.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

MORUS ALBA

--

----

Total Cover =

LAMIUM AMPLEXICAULE Barbarea vulgaris

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

ALLIARIA PETIOLATA

--

MORUS ALBA -- 3

5

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

While the dominance test is greater than 50%, the prevalence index is greater than 3 and the sample point did not meet the rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation criterion. Understory is dominated by upland species, shrub & overstory dominated by FAC spp.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): <2 Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 21 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >22 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >22 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Series Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 22 1 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

04/13/12

-Tracy sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

silty clay loamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeS. Kraszeweksi

----

Remarks: Lower topography than adjacent agricultural field. Surface cracks outside of sample point within wetland.

--

----

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

na

Depressional area adjacent to farm field. Farmer did not farm last year, tilled the outside perimeter this year.

Depression Local Relief: Concave -

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

EM1

--

S. CarlsonLa PorteIndianaW-504b1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-504b 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. 100 x 2 = 200

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 200 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 100 Y FACW2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:Reed canary grass dominated depression.

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

---- 1

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 15 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Series Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 18 1 10YR 4/1 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

04/14/12

-Riddles loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

silty clay loamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeS. Carlson

----

Remarks: --

--

----

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

- Local Relief: - -

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

upland

--

S. KraszewskiLa PorteIndianaW-505a1u

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-505a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 Y FACU2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

5 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 25 x 4 = 100

1. 15 Y FACU UPL spp. 80 x 5 = 400

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 110 (A) 515 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.682

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

15 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 5 N FAC2. 60 Y NI3. 20 Y UPL4. 5 N FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

90

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:Solidago canadensis, giant ragweed on edge, not at survey point

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Prunus serotina -- 0

4

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

LONICERA TATARICA

--

----

Total Cover =

DAUCUS CAROTA TARAXACUM OFFICINALE

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

BARBAREA VULGARIS

--

0.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

LAMIUM AMPLEXICAULE

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 15 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >24 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >24 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Series Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 4 1 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M4 24 2 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 3/4 2 C M4 24 2 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 8 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

04/14/12

-Riddles loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

clay loamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeS. Kraszewski

----

Remarks: --

--

clay loamclay loam

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

--

- Local Relief: - -

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

FO1

--

S. CarlsonLa PorteIndianaW-505a1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-505a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FACW2. 15 N FACU (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

55 FACW spp. 130 x 2 = 260

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 20 x 4 = 80

1. 10 Y FACW UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 150 (A) 340 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.267

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

10 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 70 Y FACW2. 5 N FACW3. 5 N FACU4. 5 N FACW5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

85

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Could not identify Carex species due to absence of a seed head. Assumed FACW.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Ulmus americana Quercus rubra 3

3

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Sambucus canadensis

--

----

Total Cover =

Ambrosia artemisiifolia Rubus idaeus var. strigosus

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Carex sp.

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

Solidago gigantea

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): N/A Latitude: N/A Longitude: Datum: N/A Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 14 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: very poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): n/a Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 8 1 10YR 4/3 -- -- -- -- -- --8 16 2 10YR 5/3 -- 10YR 3/6 5 -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/25/11

--Histosols and Aquolls

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

----

Remarks: --

--

Silt Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

Edge

-- Local Relief: --N/A

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-506a1u

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-506a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 20 Y NI2. 5 N FACW (A)3. 5 N FACW4. 5 N FAC (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

35 FACW spp. 12 x 2 = 24

FAC spp. 15 x 3 = 45

FACU spp. 10 x 4 = 40

1. 5 Y FACU UPL spp. 20 x 5 = 100

2. 2 Y FACW3. -- -- -- Total 57 (A) 209 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.667

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

7 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 5 Y FAC2. 5 Y FAC3. 5 Y FACU4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

15

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Very sparse understory

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Crataegus sp.Ulmus americana 3

6

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

ROSA MULTIFLORA

--

Populus deltoidesQuercus palustris

Total Cover =

Solidago canadensis --

Lindera benzoin

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Toxicodendron radicans subsp. negund

--

50.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

Phytolacca americana

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): N/A Latitude: N/A Longitude: Datum: N/A Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 14 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 3 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 3 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: very poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): N/A Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 5 1 10YR 5/1 -- -- -- -- -- --5 14 2 10YR 3/1 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-506a1w

N/A

Shrub scrub wetland

-- Local Relief: --N/A

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PSS/PEM

------

Remarks: --

--

Peat--

No

Buried O horizon (peat) below sediment layer eroding from nearby field Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

PSS1/EMBHistosols and Aquolls

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/25/11

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-506a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 Y OBL2. 2 Y FACW (A)3. 1 N FAC4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 65 x 1 = 65

8 FACW spp. 57 x 2 = 114

FAC spp. 1 x 3 = 3

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 50 Y OBL UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 123 (A) 182 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.480

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

50 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 5 N FACW2. 5 N OBL3. 5 N OBL4. 20 Y FACW5. 10 Y FACW6 10 Y FACW7. 10 Y FACW8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

65

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

Carex lupulina

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Spiraea alba

--

Helenium autumnale

Total Cover =

Cephalanthus occidentalis

--

--Populus deltoides

Total Cover =

TYPHA ANGUSTIFOLIAPHALARIS ARUNDINACEA

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Carex scoparia

--

Salix nigraPlatanus occidentalis 7

7

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Very dense shrub wetland community on north side of ROW, emergent marsh community on south and east.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Phragmites australis

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 14 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam Series Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalf Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 15 1 10YR 4/4 -- -- -- -- -- --15 18 2 10YR 3/4 98 10YR 4/3 2 -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-506b1u

N/A

--

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

------

Remarks: --

--

Silt Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

n/aRiddles loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/25/11

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-506b 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 10 Y FACU2. 5 Y FACW (A)3. 5 Y FAC4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

20 FACW spp. 5 x 2 = 10

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 30 x 4 = 120

1. 10 Y FACU UPL spp. 60 x 5 = 300

2. 10 Y FACU3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 445 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.450

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

20 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 60 Y UPL2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

60

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

33.3%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

ROSA MULTIFLORA

--

--Ulmus rubra

Total Cover =

----

LONICERA JAPONICA

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

ZEA MAYS

--

Acer saccharumQuercus palustris 2

6

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Point taken within cornfield/farmed edge

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 14 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 6 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 3 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 3 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Homer loam Series Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Endoaqualfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 5 1 10YR 5/1 -- -- -- -- -- --5 9 2 10YR 2/1 -- -- -- -- -- --9 14 3 N 5/ -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/25/11

PFO1B, PFO/SS1BHomer loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Sandy LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

----

Remarks: --

--

PeatSilt

No

Gleyed matrix below 9 inches. Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

80% scrub shrub, 20% emergent; area is near wetland with NWI classification PFO/SS1B and PFO1B.

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PEM/PSS

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-506b1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-506b 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 Y OBL2. 2 Y FAC (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 35 x 1 = 35

7 FACW spp. 45 x 2 = 90

FAC spp. 7 x 3 = 21

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 20 Y OBL UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 87 (A) 146 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.678

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

20 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 20 Y FACW2. 10 Y FACW3. 10 Y FACW4. 5 N FAC5. 5 N FACW6 5 N OBL7. 5 N OBL8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

60

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Bidens discoideus

Salix nigraPopulus deltoides 6

6

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Polygonum amphibium

--

Scirpus cyperinus

Total Cover =

Cephalanthus occidentalis

--

----

Total Cover =

Helenium autumnaleToxicodendron radicans subsp. negund

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Phragmites australis

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 14 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: na (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >20 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 18 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedSeries Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 1 1 10YR 2/1 100 -- -- -- -- --1 20 2 10YR 4/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

S. KraszewskiLa PorteIndianaW-506b2w

N/A

W-506b was delineated in 2011. Only a wetland sample point was taken in 2012 to confirm extension of the wetland boundary on newly accessed parcels.

- Local Relief: Concave -

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

FO1

------

Remarks: Topography change from drainage wetland to upland mesic forest

--

clay--

No

tight clay Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

PFO1BRiddles loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

silty clayColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeS. Carlson

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

04/14/12

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-506b 2w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 20 Y FACW2. 20 Y FACW (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

40 FACW spp. 40 x 2 = 80

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 40 (A) 80 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

--

--

Acer saccharinum Ulmus americana 2

2

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

No herbaceous layer present.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 13 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam Series Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Epiaqualfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 14 1 10YR 3/3 -- -- -- -- -- --14 18 2 10YR 4/4 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-507a1u

N/A

Point taken in active corn field

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

------

Remarks: --

--

Silty clay loam--

No

Tilled ag soils Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

--Blount silt loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/24/11

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-507a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 100 x 5 = 500

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 500 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 100 Y UPL2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

0.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

ZEA MAYS

--

---- 0

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 13 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 3 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 4 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 10 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 10 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam Series Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Epiaqualfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 10 1 10YR 4/1 -- 10YR 3/6 5 C M0 10 1 10YR 4/1 -- 10YR 4/4 5 C M10 16 2 10YR 5/1 -- 10YR 3/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/24/11

--Blount silt loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

----

Remarks: Rutted dug-up shallow depression in corn field

--

Silt LoamSilt Loam

No

Highly disturbed soils Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

Shallow, rutted depression in corn field, heavily disturbed

Depression Local Relief: Concave--

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PEM

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-507a1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-507a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 17 x 1 = 17

0 FACW spp. 60 x 2 = 120

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 5 x 4 = 20

1. 5 Y FAC UPL spp. 2 x 5 = 10

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 89 (A) 182 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.045

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

5 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 10 Y FACW2. 20 Y FACW3. 10 Y OBL4. 10 Y FACW5. 5 N OBL6 5 N FACU7. 2 N OBL8. 20 Y FACW9. 2 N NI Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

84

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

DATURA STRAMONIUM

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Polygonum amphibium

---- 6

6

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

TYPHA ANGUSTIFOLIA

--

Ambrosia artemisiifolia

Total Cover =

Populus deltoides

--

----

Total Cover =

Alisma subcordatum AGROSTIS GIGANTEA

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Phragmites australis

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

ECHINOCHLOA CRUSGALLI

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 7 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam Series Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 12 1 10YR 3/3 -- -- -- -- -- --12 18 2 10YR 4/4 -- 10YR 4/6 2 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-508a1u

N/A

Point taken in corn field approximately 20ft south of wetland.

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

------

Remarks: --

--

Silt Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

--Riddles loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/24/11

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-508a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 100 x 5 = 500

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 500 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 100 Y UPL2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

0.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

ZEA MAYS

--

---- 0

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 7 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 3 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 10 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 10 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam Series Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 14 1 10YR 4/1 -- 10YR 3/6 8 -- --14 18 2 10YR 5/1 -- 10YR 3/6 10 -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/24/11

--Riddles loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeJ. Wiater

----

Remarks: Uncultivated portion of corn field with standing water

--

Silty Clay Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

Active ag field

Depression Local Relief: Concave--

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PEM

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-508a1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-508a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 15 x 1 = 15

0 FACW spp. 42 x 2 = 84

FAC spp. 22 x 3 = 66

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 79 (A) 165 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.089

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 40 Y FACW2. 10 N FAC3. 10 N FAC4. 2 N FACW5. 2 N FAC6 5 N OBL7. 5 N OBL8. 5 N OBL9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

79

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Phytolacca americana

---- 1

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Polygonum amphibium

--

Calamagrostis canadensis

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

Ambrosia trifidaCyperus esculentus

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

AGROSTIS GIGANTEA

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

Xanthium strumarium

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

Echinochloa muricata

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 8 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Washtenaw silt loam Series Drainage Class: poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Fluvaquents Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 10 1 10YR 3/2 -- -- -- -- -- --10 18 2 10YR 3/2 -- 10YR 4/3 20 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/23/11

--Washtenaw silt loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeM. Van Loan

----

Remarks: --

--

Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

Sample point just upslope from small depression.

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

--

J. DelmedicoLa PorteIndianaW-510a1u

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 100 x 4 = 400

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 400 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 10 N FACU2. 10 N FACU3. 80 Y FACU4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

---- 0

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

CIRSIUM ARVENSE--

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

SETARIA FABERI

--

0.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

Solidago canadensis

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 8 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 6 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Washtenaw silt loam Series Drainage Class: very poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Fluvaquents Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 8 1 10YR 3/2 -- -- -- -- -- --8 12 2 10YR 3/2 -- -- -- -- -- --12 18 3 10YR 3/1 -- 10YR 5/6 50 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

J. DelmedicoLa PorteIndianaW-510a1w

N/A

Area is a small depression over existing pip where someone pulled soil back to make a dirt bike jump.

Depression Local Relief: Concave--

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PEM

------

Remarks: --

--

Clay LoamClay

No

Soil sample taken directly above pipe, and soil also removed to make a dirt bike jump. Soils are disturbed. Given wetland hydrology and vegetation, soils are assumed hydric.

Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

--Washtenaw silt loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeM. Van Loan

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/23/11

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 15 x 1 = 15

0 FACW spp. 80 x 2 = 160

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 190 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.900

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 5 N FAC2. 10 N OBL3. 5 N OBL4. 80 Y FACW5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

Polygonum amphibium

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

Carex stipataBidens frondosus

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

RUMEX CRISPUS

--

---- 1

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 4 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Homer loam Series Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Endoaqualfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 14 1 10YR 4/3 -- -- -- -- -- --14 20 2 10YR 5/3 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/27/11

--Homer loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Sandy Clay LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeD. Tersteeg

----

Remarks: --

--

Sandy Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

--

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-510b1u

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510b 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 N FACU2. 70 Y FACU (A)3. 5 N FACU4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

80 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 110 x 4 = 440

1. 20 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 10 Y FACU3. -- -- -- Total 110 (A) 440 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

30 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Juglans nigra Acer saccharum 0

3

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Acer saccharum

--

--Prunus serotina

Total Cover =

----

ROSA MULTIFLORA

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

--

--

0.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 4 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 2 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: very poorly and poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): n/a Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 4 1 10YR 4/2 -- -- -- -- -- --4 10 2 5GY 5 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/27/11

PUBF, PSS1/EMFHistosols and Aquolls

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Mucky Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeD. Tersteeg

----

Remarks: --

--

Clay Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

--

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PEM

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-510b1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510b 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 20 x 1 = 20

0 FACW spp. 90 x 2 = 180

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 5 Y OBL UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 5 Y OBL3. -- -- -- Total 110 (A) 200 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.818

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

10 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 90 Y FACW2. 10 N OBL3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

---- 3

3

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Cephalanthus occidentalis

--

----

Total Cover =

----

Salix exigua subsp. interior

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Impatiens capensis

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

Saururus cernuus

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 4 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: very poorly and poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): n/a Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 10 1 10YR 3/2 -- -- -- -- -- --10 15 2 10YR 4/3 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/27/11

--Histosols and Aquolls

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silty Clay LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeD. Tersteeg

----

Remarks: --

--

Clay Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

--

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

--

J. CurrieLa PorteIndianaW-510b2u

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510b 2u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 85 x 3 = 255

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 85 (A) 255 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 80 Y FAC2. 5 N FAC3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

85

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:Although hydrophytic vegetation present, soils and hydrology support upland delineation. Dominant vegetation is only facultative.

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

---- 1

1

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

POA PRATENSIS

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

RUMEX CRISPUS

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: City/County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 9 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: na (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >9 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >9 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: very poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): NA Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 4 1 2.5Y 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --4 9 2 10YR 5/6 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Rolling Prairie/ La PorteIndianaW-510-f1u

na

--

upland forest Local Relief: flat--

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

upland

----

Remarks:

--

--

sandy loam--

No

--

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement ProjectEnbridgeMatt Arsenault Anthony Terwall

Matrix

Histosols and Aquolls NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

sandy loamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: hardpan Depth: 9" Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

--

--

Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

none

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

06/07/12

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510-f 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 65 Y FACU2. 20 N FACU (A)3. 40 Y FACU4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

125 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 230 x 4 = 920

1. 85 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 230 (A) 920 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

85 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 20 Y FACU2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

20

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

--

--

0.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Acer saccharum

--

--Fraxinus americana

--

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Acer saccharum

--

Acer saccharumFagus grandifolia 0

4

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: City/County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: -86.53352 Datum: -- Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 9 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 7 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: very poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): NA Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 4 1 2.5Y 3/1 100 -- -- -- -- --4 6 2 2.5Y 3/1 100 -- -- -- -- --6 10 3 2.5Y 6/1 95 2.5Y 5/6 510 18 4 2.5Y 5/1 90 10YR 4/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

06/07/12

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

organicColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: n/a Depth: n/a Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

41.57015

--

Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

PEMF

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement ProjectEnbridgeMatt Arsenault Anthony Terwall

Matrix

Histosols and Aquolls

--

--

silt loamfine sandy loam

No

--

na

--

isolated basin Local Relief: concave-87.01743

silty clay loam

Color (Moist)Mottles

EM1 / SS1

----

Remarks:

Rolling Prairie/ La PorteIndianaW-510-f1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-510-f 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 3 N FACW2. 1 N FACW (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 98 x 1 = 98

4 FACW spp. 54 x 2 = 108

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 15 Y OBL UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 152 (A) 206 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.355

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

15 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 60 Y OBL2. 50 Y FACW3. 20 N OBL4. 3 N OBL5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

133

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

3

3

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

Glyceria septentrionalis

--

Fraxinus pennsylvanicaUlmus americana

--

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Impatiens capensis

--

--

Total Cover =

Cephalanthus occidentalis

--

----

--

Total Cover =

Carex lupulinaSium suave

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

--

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 4 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam Series Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typica Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 12 1 10YR 3/2 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M12 20 2 10YR 5/2 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/27/11

--Riddles loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeB. Meyer

----

Remarks:

Although one hydrophytic vegetation indicator is positive, there is a mix of upland and wetland vegetation. The lack of primary wetland hydrology indicators combined with professional judgement supports a determination of upland at this location.

--

Silt Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

--

No primary hydrology indicators were observed; only the FAC-Neutral test was met.

A. BinkowskiLa PorteIndianaW-511a1u

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-511a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 30 Y --2. 30 Y FACW (A)3. 30 Y FACU4. 10 N FACU (B)5. 5 N FACU6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 4 x 1 = 4

105 FACW spp. 50 x 2 = 100

FAC spp. 35 x 3 = 105

FACU spp. 105 x 4 = 420

1. 15 Y FACW UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 10 Y FACU3. 5 Y FACW Total 194 (A) 629 (B)

4. 2 Y OBL5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.242

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

32 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 50 Y FACU2. 20 Y FAC3. 5 N FAC4. 2 N OBL5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

77

1. 10 Y FAC2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

10

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

While the dominance test is greater than 50%, the Prevalence Index is greater than 3 and the rapid test was not met.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Hawthorn sp.Acer saccharinum 6

10

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Ulmus americana

Quercus palustris

Carya ovataAcer saccharum

Total Cover =

Ambrosia trifidaCarex lupulina

ROSA MULTIFLORA

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

Tilia americana

Solidago canadensis

--

60.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Toxicodendron radicans subsp. negund--

--

Euthamia tenuifolia

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Cephalanthus occidentalis

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 4 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 9 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 5 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Homer loam Series Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Endoaqualfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 18 1 10YR 2/1 -- -- -- -- -- --18 26 2 10YR 5/2 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

10/27/11

--Homer loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeB. Meyer

----

Remarks: --

--

Silty Clay Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

N/A

Soils are not hydric at this particular location. However, based on overwhelming evidence of wetland vegetation and wetland hydrololgy, combined with professional judgement, a determination of wetland is supported at this location.

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

PFO

--

A. BinkowskiLa PorteIndianaW-511a1w

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-511a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 100 Y FACW2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 40 x 1 = 40

100 FACW spp. 112 x 2 = 224

FAC spp. 10 x 3 = 30

FACU spp. 10 x 4 = 40

1. 20 Y OBL UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 10 Y FACU3. 2 N FACW Total 172 (A) 334 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.942

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

32 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 10 Y OBL2. 10 Y OBL3. 10 Y FACW4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

30

1. 10 Y FAC2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

10

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Acer saccharinum -- 6

7

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Cephalanthus occidentalis

Ulmus americana

----

Total Cover =

Symphyotrichum racemosum--

ROSA MULTIFLORA

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Carex lupulina

--

85.7%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Toxicodendron radicans subsp. negund--

--

Calamagrostis canadensis

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 3 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam Series Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 11 1 10YR 4/3 -- -- -- -- -- --11 16 2 10YR 3/4 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Soils are sandy and therefore naturally problematic.

-- Local Relief: --

--

--

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

Sandy loam--

W-512d

Enbridge

--

--

Remarks:

Remarks:

--Tracy sandy loam

Indiana Line 6B

Type: N/A Depth: N/A

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

Sandy loam

------

J. Wiater J. Currie Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

No

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

1uUpland

La Porte10/22/11

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-512d 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 10 Y FACU2. 10 Y FACW (A)3. 5 N FACU4. 5 N FACU (B)5. <2 N FACU6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

30 FACW spp. 10 x 2 = 20

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 35 x 4 = 140

1. 5 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 5 Y --3. -- -- -- Total 50 (A) 175 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.500

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

10 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 10 Y --2. 5 Y FACU3. 5 Y FACU4. 5 Y --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

25

1. 5 Y FAC2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

5

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Geranium maculatum

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

--Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

22.2%

--

Multiply by:

----

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Parthenocissus quinquefolia --

--

--

--

Total Cover =

LONICERA JAPONICA

--

Liriondendron tulipiferaCarya ovata

Total Cover =

ROSA MULTIFLORA Panicum sp.

Viola sp.

Shrub sp.

9

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

Acer saccharum

--

Juglans nigra Platanus occidentalis

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 3 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 37 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam Series Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 16 1 10YR 4/1 -- 10YR 3/6 5 C M16 24 2 10YR 5/2 -- 10YR 3/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

1wPFO/PSS

La Porte10/22/11

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

No

No

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

--Tracy sandy loam

Indiana Line 6B

Type: N/A Depth: N/A

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

Sandy loam with gravel

------

J. Wiater J. Currie Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes

W-512d

Enbridge

Located at toe of 2 slopes with scour channel.

--

Remarks:

Remarks:

Soils are sandy and therefore naturally problematic.

Toeslope Local Relief: --

Stratified sediment layers of coarser gravel throughout profile

--

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

Sandy loam with gravel--

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-512d 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 Y FACU2. 5 Y FACU (A)3. 5 Y FAC4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 20 x 1 = 20

15 FACW spp. 37 x 2 = 74

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 20 x 4 = 80

1. 10 Y FACW UPL spp. 2 x 5 = 10

2. 10 Y FACU3. -- -- -- Total 84 (A) 199 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.369

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

20 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 20 Y FACW2. 10 Y OBL3. 10 Y OBL4. 5 N --5. 2 N UPL6 2 N FACW7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

49

1. 5 Y FACW2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

5

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Moderately hydric veg.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6

--

Juglans nigra Liriodendron tulipifera

Species Name

Vitis riparia --

--

--

Aster firmus

Total Cover =

Lindera benzoin

--

--Celtis occidentalis

Total Cover =

Carex lupulina Brassica sp.

Pilea pumila

LONICERA JAPONICA

9

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

66.7%

--

Multiply by:

----

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Boehmeria cylindrica

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

HESPERIS MATRONALIS

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: 1u Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID: upland Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 35 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 38 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedSeries Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 10 1 10YR 2/2 100 -- -- -- -- --10 18 2 10YR 4/4 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

Deciduous woodland dominated by sugar maple. 3-5 feet upgradient of wetland.

- Local Relief: mid-slope

--

-

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

loamy sand--

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

Type: n/a Depth: n/a

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

sandy loam

------

D. Tersteeg S. Kraszewski Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes

W-513a

Enbridge

mid-slope above wetland

--

Remarks:

LaPorte

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

-Tracy sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erode

04/16/12

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

No

No

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-513a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 N FACU2. 70 Y FACU (A)3. 10 N UPL4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

85 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 5 x 3 = 15

FACU spp. 200 x 4 = 800

1. 30 Y FACU UPL spp. 13 x 5 = 65

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 218 (A) 880 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.037

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

30 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 90 Y FACU2. 5 N FACU3. 5 N FAC4. 3 N NI5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

103

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Cardamine concatenata

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

--Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

0.0%

--

Multiply by:

----

----

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Acer saccharum

--

--

Total Cover =

Parthenocissus quinquefolia Erythronium americanum

Podophyllum peltatum

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0

--

Prunus serotina Acer saccharum

Species Name

Liriodendron tulipifera3

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Herbaceous layer dominated by spring ephemerals

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: 1w Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID: FO1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 35 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 38 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: poorly - very poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): n/a Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 3 1 10YR 2/1 100 -- -- -- -- --3 16 2 10YR 3/1 100 -- -- -- -- --16 20 3 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 6/1 10 D M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

Forested wetland with open wetland shrub-scrub community

- Local Relief: -

--

-

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

silt loamsandy clay loam

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

Type: n/a Depth: n/a

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

mucky loam

------

D. Tersteeg S. Kraszewski Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes

W-513a

Enbridge

Buttressed tree trunks

--

Remarks:

LaPorte

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

-Histosols and Aquolls

04/16/12

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

No

No

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-513a 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 70 Y FACW2. 10 N FACU (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 13 x 1 = 13

80 FACW spp. 70 x 2 = 140

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 10 x 4 = 40

1. 10 Y OBL UPL spp. 2 x 5 = 10

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 95 (A) 203 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.137

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

10 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 2 Y NI2. 3 Y OBL3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

5

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Galium asprellum

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

--Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

75.0%

--

Multiply by:

----

----

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Cephalanthus occidentalis

--

--

Total Cover =

----

Carex sp.

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3

--

Acer saccharinum Acer saccharum

Species Name

--4

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Sparse herbaceous layer. Morphological adaptations include buttressed tree trunks.

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: 2u Slope (%): 3 Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID: upland Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 35 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 38 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Histosols and Aquolls Series Drainage Class: poorly - very poorly Taxonomy (Subgroup): n/a Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 10 1 10YR 3/3 100 -- -- -- -- --10 18 2 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

Deciduous woodland dominated by sugar maple. 3-5 feet upgradient of wetland.

- Local Relief: slope

--

-

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

sandy clay loam--

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

Type: n/a Depth: n/a

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

sandy loam

------

D. Tersteeg S. Kraszewski Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes

W-513a

Enbridge

--

--

Remarks:

LaPorte

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

-Histosols and Aquolls

04/16/12

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

No

No

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-513a 2u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 30 Y FACU2. 20 Y FACW (A)3. 5 N UPL4. 10 N FACU (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

65 FACW spp. 27 x 2 = 54

FAC spp. 20 x 3 = 60

FACU spp. 135 x 4 = 540

1. 15 Y FACU UPL spp. 5 x 5 = 25

2. 10 Y FACU3. 2 N FACW Total 187 (A) 679 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.631

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

27 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 20 Y FAC2. 70 Y FACU3. 10 N --4. 5 N FACW5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

105

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Cardamine concatenata

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

--Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

33.3%

--

Multiply by:

----

----

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Prunus serotina

Lindera benzoin

Prunus serotina

Total Cover =

Lilium spp. Arisaema triphyllum

Parthenocissus quinquefolia

Acer saccharum

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2

--

Acer saccharumAcer saccharinum

Species Name

Liriodendron tulipifera6

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: 1u Slope (%): 2 Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID: upland Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 35 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 38 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: n/a (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: >18 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedSeries Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 14 1 10YR 4/4 100 -- -- -- -- --14 18 2 10YR 5/4 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

04/16/12

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

No

No

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

-Tracy sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erode

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

Type: n/a Depth: n/a

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

sandy loam

------

D. Tersteeg S. Kraszewski Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes

W-513b

Enbridge

Midslope upgradient from wetland

--

Remarks:

LaPorte

Remarks:

Decidious mesic woodland 5 feet upgradient of wetland

- Local Relief: midslope

--

-

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

fine sandy loam--

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-513b 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 20 Y FACU2. 50 Y FACU (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

70 FACW spp. 20 x 2 = 40

FAC spp. 10 x 3 = 30

FACU spp. 85 x 4 = 340

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 1 x 5 = 5

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 116 (A) 415 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.578

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 10 Y FAC2. 15 Y FACU3. 5 N FACW4. 5 N FACW5. 7 N FACW6 1 N UPL7. 3 N FACW8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

46

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1

--

Prunus serotina Acer saccharum

Species Name

--4

----

Fraxinus pennsylvanica

--

Ribes cynosbati

Total Cover =

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Pilea pumila Arisaema triphyllum

Parthenocissus quinquefolia

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

25.0%

--

Multiply by:

----

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Prunus serotina

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Impatiens capensis

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701660 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: 1w Slope (%): - Latitude: - Longitude: Datum: - Community ID: FO1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 35 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 38 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B15 - Marl Deposits B16 - Moss Trim LinesB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D2 - Geomorphic PositionB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Other (Explain) D3 - Shallow AquitardB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface D4 - Microtopographic Relief

D5 - FAC-Neutral Test

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Tracy sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedSeries Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 18 1 10YR 3/1 80 7.5YR 3/4 20 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface A10 - 2 cm Muck (LRR K, L, MLRA149B)A2 - Histic Epipedon (LRR R, MLRA 149B) A16 - Coast Prairie Redox (LRR K, L, R)A3 - Black Histic S9 - Thin Dark Surface S3 - 5cm Mucky Peat of Peat (LRR K, L, R)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide (LRR R, MLRA 149B) S7 - Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A5 - Stratified Layers F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral S8 - Polyvalue Below Surface (LRR K, L)A11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface (LRR K, L) S9 - Thin Dark Surface (LRR K, L)A12 - Thick Dark Surface F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses (LRR K, L, R)S1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F3 - Depleted Matrix F19 - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MLRA 149B)S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix F6 - Redox Dark Surface TA6 - Mesic Spodic (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)S5 - Sandy Redox F7 - Depleted Dark Surface TF2 - Red Parent MaterialS6 - Stripped Matrix F8 - Redox Depressions TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceS7 - Dark Surface (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

Low swale area adjacent to large open water shrub scrub wetland

Swale Local Relief: Concave

--

-

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

YesHydric Soil Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

----

Line 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

Type: n/a Depth: n/a

NWI/WWI Classification:

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Matrix

silty clay loam

------

S. Kraszewski D. Tersteeg Indiana

Are normal circumstances present? Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes

W-513b

Enbridge

--

--

Remarks:

LaPorte

Color (Moist)

N/A

1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

-Tracy sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erode

04/16/12

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMNorthcentral and Northeast Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Yes No

No

No

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-513b 1w

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 70 Y FACW2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 7 x 1 = 7

70 FACW spp. 90 x 2 = 180

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 5 x 4 = 20

1. 5 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 10 Y FACW3. -- -- -- Total 102 (A) 207 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.029

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

15 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 10 Y FACW2. 5 Y OBL3. 2 N OBL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

17

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointLine 6B Phase 2 Replacement Project

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

--

Glyceria striata

--

Herb -

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

--Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

80.0%

--

Multiply by:

----

----

--

--

--

Total Cover =

ROSA MULTIFLORA

--

--

Total Cover =

Juncus effusus --

Impatiens capensis

Lindera benzoin

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4

--

Acer saccharinum --

Species Name

--5

--

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

Sparsely vegetated herbaceous layer

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Northcentral and Northeast Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Page 1 of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193701313 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point:

Slope (%): -- Latitude: -- Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID:

Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: 30 Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: 38 N Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: 2 Dir: WSUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):Primary: Secondary:

A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: N/A (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Riddles loam Series Drainage Class: well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 6 1 10YR 4/2 -- -- -- -- -- --6 16 2 10YR 5/3 -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox F12 - Iron-Manganese Masses A3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck MineralA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed MatrixA10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

A. BinkowskiLa PorteIndianaW-515a1u

N/A

5 ft higher in elevation than wetland point

-- Local Relief: ----

--

Color (Moist)Mottles

Upland

------

Remarks: No primary hydrology indicators were observed; only FAC-Neutral was met.

--

Sandy Clay Loam--

No

-- Remarks:

Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

Yes

Matrix

--Riddles loam

Indiana Line 6B

NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Silt LoamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Locaiton: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

EnbridgeB. Kuykendahl

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

11/09/11

Page 2 of 2

Project/Site: W-515a 1u

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FACW2. 10 Y FACW (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

50 FACW spp. 70 x 2 = 140

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 20 Y FACW UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 70 (A) 140 (B)

4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.000

6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

20 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *

Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *

Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -

10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No5. -- -- --4. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample PointIndiana Line 6B

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

--

----

--

--

Tree -

Wetland ID:

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

--

Herb -

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 meter radius)

--

All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall

Multiply by:

100.0%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Acer saccharinum

--

----

Total Cover =

----

--

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 meter radius)

--

--

--

Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer saccharinum 3

3

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Although wetland vegetation is present, the lack of wetland hydrology and hydric soil supports an upland determination.

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10 meter radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

--

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--