WESTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS … Estate PDF report/Erf 660 De Doorns... · WESTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Basic Assessment

Basic Assessment Report for the proposed Romanze Estate, Portion A of Erf 660, De Doorns

DEA&DP Reference number: E12/2/3/1 – B2/5-0679/08 1

WESTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

Basic Assessment Report in terms of the National Environmental

Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended, and the

Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2006

JULY 2006

Kindly note that: 1. This Basic Assessment Report is the standard report required by DEA&DP in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2006 and

must be completed for all Basic Assessment applications and submitted together with the application form. 2. This report is current as of 1 July 2006. It is the responsibility of the Applicant / EAP to ascertain whether subsequent

versions of the report have been published or produced by the competent authority.

3. The required information must be typed within the spaces provided in the report. The sizes of the spaces provided are not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. It is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing.

4. Incomplete reports may be rejected or returned to the applicant for amendment. 5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection. Where it is used in respect of material

information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, this may result in the rejection of the report as provided for in the regulations.

6. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. 7. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner. 8. Unless protected by law all information contained in, and attached to this report, wi ll become public information on receipt

by the competent authority. Upon request, any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in and attached to this report. During any stage of the application process, the information contained in and attached to it must be provided by the applicant / EAP.

9. This report must be submitted to the Department at the postal address given below or by delivery thereof to the Registry

Office of the Department. Should the report and attached information not be submitted to the addresses given below it will be rejected.

DEPARTMENTAL DETAILS

CAPE TOWN OFFICE REGION A (Breede River/ Winelands, City of Cape Town: Tygerberg and Oostenberg Administrations)

CAPE TOWN OFFICE REGION B (West Coast, Overberg, City of Cape Town: Helderberg, South Peninsula, Cape Town and Blaauwberg Administrations

GEORGE OFFICE (Eden and Central Karoo)

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Attention: Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A2) Private Bag X 9086 Cape Town, 8000 Registry Office 1

st Floor Utilitas Building

1 Dorp Street, Cape Town Queries should be directed to the Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A2) at: Tel: (021) 483-4793 Fax (021) 483-3633

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Attention: Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region B) Private Bag X 9086 Cape Town, 8000 Registry Office 1

st Floor Utilitas Building

1 Dorp Street, Cape Town Queries should be directed to the Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region B) at: Tel: (021) 483-4094 Fax (021) 483-4372

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Attention: Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A1) Private Bag X 6509 George, 6530 Registry Office 4

th Floor, York Park Building

93 York Street George Queries should be directed to the Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A1) at: Tel: (044) 874-2160 Fax (021) 874-2423

View website the Department’s website on http://www.westerncape.gov.za/eadp for the latest version of the

documents



Contents

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION......................................................................... 3

1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 3

2. ACTIVITY NEED AND DESIRABILITY ................................................... 5

3. ALTERNATIVES..................................................................................... 8

4. ACTIVITY LOCATION .......................................................................... 10

5. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY ..................................................... 10

6. SITE ACCESS...................................................................................... 11

7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................ 12

8. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES ........ 12

SECTION B: DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ............................... 13

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE.................................................................... 13

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE ................................................................. 14

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE 14

4. SURFACE WATER.............................................................................. 14

5. VEGETATION / GROUNDCOVER ....................................................... 15

6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA ......................... 16

7. REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT ...................................................... 17

8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT ........................................................... 19

9. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES ................................................ 19

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................................................... 22

SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT .............................................................................. 24

1. WASTE, EFFLUENT AND EMISSION MANAGEMENT ......................... 24

2. WATER USE ........................................................................................ 25

3. POWER SUPPLY ................................................................................. 25

4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY ........................................................................ 27

5. NOISE IMPACTS ................................................................................. 27

6. VISUAL IMPACTS ................................................................................ 27

7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACTIVITY ...................... 29

8. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE ............................................................................. 30

9. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASE... 50

10. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE DECOMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE ........................................................................................ 67

11. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ..................................................................... 68

12. IMPACT SUMMARY OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ........................ 70

13. RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER............................................................................................ 70

APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................ 73



SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

(a) Is the project a new development or an upgrade of an existing development? YES �� NO

(b) Clearly describe the activity and associated infrastructure for which you are applying.

The proposed Portion A of Erf 660, De Doorns, hereafter referred to as the “Subject Land”, is situated adjacent to the existing municipal Golf Course and High School in De Doorns, in the Breede Valley Municipality.. See Appendix A: Locality Maps. The Subject Land is currently zoned for agricultural use and is cultivated with wine vineyard. There are no built structures located on the proposed Portion A. Grasmere Trust, as owners of the Subject Land, hereafter referred to as the “Developer”, propose the following:

• The subdivision of Erf 660, De Doorns, into two portions, namely a proposed Remainder portion (approximately 24.78 hectare), and a proposed Portion A (approximately 4.15 hectare);

• The subsequent Rezoning of Portion A from Agricultural Zone to Subdivisional Area, in order to accommodate subsequent Residential Zone I, Private Open Space II Zone and Transport Zone II zonings in terms of Article 8 of the Zoning Scheme Regulations provided for in the Provincial Land Use Planning Ordinance (Act 15 of 1985);

• The subsequent subdivision of rezoned Portion A, in order to accommodate the proposed “De Doorns (Romanze) Estate”, which is proposed to comprise of the following elements:

o 38 single residential erven; o Private open space areas; o Associated service infrastructure; o Associated access and internal roads.

The Developer intends constructing a perimeter palisade wall with a single entrance and gatehouse. It is expected that the construction of housing will commence within a year from the date of authorisation. The development, for the purposes of this application, consists of earthworks to prepare the land i.e. removal of vineyards, grading, trenching and compacting, the construction of an internal road network, and the installation of electric, water, storm water and sewer systems. Specific listed activities applied for: Listed activity 1(k): The construction of facilities or infrastructure, including associated structures or infrastructure for the bulk transportation of sewage and water, including storm water, in pipelines or channels with (i) An internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or (ii) A peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more;

Listed activity 1(m): any purpose in the one in ten year flood line of a river or stream, or within 32 metres from the bank of a river or stream where the flood line is unknown, excluding purposes associated with existing residential use, but including -

(i) canals; (ii) channels; (iii) bridges; (iv) dams; and weirs;

The proposed Portion A of Erf 660 (which is to be rezoned for residential use) abuts a farm dam, which lies between the northernrmost residential node and the De Doorns built edge. The dam will be retained. No building will take place below the 1 in 50 year floodline (see Floodline Assessment in Appendix G). A culvert on the south-western corner?? of the development will be replaced with a larger structure to prevent flooding.



Listed activity 15: The construction of a road that is wider than 4 metres or that has a reserve wider than 6 metres, excluding roads that fall within the ambit of another listed activity or which are access roads of less than 30 metres long;

Listed activity 16: The transformation of undeveloped, vacant or derelict land to – residential, mixed, retail, commercial, industrial or institutional use where such development does not constitute infill and where the total area to be transformed is bigger than 1 hectare.

Listed activity 18: The subdivision of portions of land 9 hectares or larger into portions of 5 hectares or less.

The Developer proposes subdividing Erf 660 into two main portions, Portion A (4.15 ha) and a Remainder (24.78 ha). Portion A will be subdivided into smaller erven for residential purposes, while the Remainder will remain under cultivation.

(c) Please provide details of all components of the proposed project and attach diagrams (e.g. architectural

drawings or perspectives, engineering drawings, process flow charts etc.).

Buildings YES �� NO

Provide brief description:

The Developer intends constructing 38 houses and a palisade perimeter wall along the boundary of Erf 660. A Homeowners Association will be established and will be responsible for enforcing the Architectural Guidelines during the Operational Phase.

Infrastructure (e.g. roads, power and water supply/ storage) YES �� NO

Provide brief description: Roads There are two possible access roads to the development. The preferred option is to access the development from Le Serene Street (next to the municipal Golf Course). This will necessitate the upgrading of a stretch of concrete-strip road to accommodate vehicles during both the construction and operational phases, while a turning circle for refuse trucks will be provided at the entrance to the development. The alternative entrance option is to formalize the existing gravel road from Voortrekker Street and improve sight distances at the intersection. The entrance would need to be shifted approximately 35 metres northward to intersect Voortrekker Street opposite Barlinka Street. A minimum road reserve width of 10 m and surfaced road width of 5 m are proposed for the access road as well as all internal roads. Electricity supply The bulk 11kV infrastructure in the vicinity of the proposed development is adequate and can be extended to supply the existing system. A new miniature substation will need to be installed to supply the 38 new erven. Internal services will consist of underground low voltage cables and sidewalk-mounted distribution kiosks. Streetlights will be installed as necessary. Water supply There is existing bulk water infrastructure in close proximity to the site and underground pipes would be laid to supply the new erven. The Developer has agreed to offset the water requirements of the new erven by ceding an equivalent portion of his existing water rights to the municipality. CES Consulting Engineers will be appointed to analyse the development’s impact on water and sewerage infrastructure if the development is authorized. Rain water will be collected from the roofs of houses to provide water for gardens, etc. Telecommunications Telephone services will be supplied by Telkom SA and will connect to the existing system. All Telkom ducts,



accessible junction boxes and manholes will be installed together with the civil engineering services. This infrastructure can also be used to facilitate an intercom system, if required, at a later date. Sewage

There are existing sewage lines in close proximity to the site, which the engineering report indicates will have sufficient capacity to accommodate sewage from the proposed development. New sewage pipes will be laid within the development site to service the new erven. Internal Storm Water System

The existing vineyard drains in a north westerly direction, eventually discharging into the Hex River. The proposed development is not expected to generate much additional stormwater, and that this should discharge into existing streams already flowing into the river.. Some of the houses will drain into the remaining vineyards, but these individual run-offs are not expected to pose any threat to the vines. An underground pipe system will also be installed to accommodate the remaining run-off generated by large 1 in 2 year storm events from paved street surfaces. These will discharge into the canal on the south eastern side of the property. The culvert over the canal will be upgraded to accommodate an access road and to reduce the risk of flooding. References 1. Kwezi V3 Engineers. October 2009. Erf 660, De Doorns: Updated report on the availability of engineering services for the proposed development (Revision 1). See Appendix G

Processing activities (e.g. manufacturing, storage, distribution) YES NO ��

Provide brief description:

Not applicable

Storage facilities for raw materials and products (e.g. volume and substances to be stored) Provide brief description YES NO ��

Not applicable

Storage and treatment facilities for solid waste and effluent generated by the project YES NO ��

Provide brief description

Municipal household solid waste will be stored at each household and removed once a week as per the usual municipal collection and dumping of solid domestic waste.

Other activities (e.g. water abstraction activities, crop planting activities) YES NO ��

Provide brief description

Not applicable

2. ACTIVITY NEED AND DESIRABILITY (a) Describe the need and desirability of the activity:

The following aspects are linked to the need of the proposed development:

• Provision of residential opportunities in De Doorns The presence of agriculturally valuable land has contributed to De Doorns having a strong agricultural-economic base (Breede Valley Municipality IDP 2007 – 2012), but has also limited urban growth. This development will provide housing on land that is of limited agricultural value.



• Provision of temporary employment during The Developer plans to use ‘sustainable housing’ in this development. This involves using natural materials (ie. rocks found on the site) as well as waste materials (discarded building rubble) as the base materials for construction. This method is cheaper, but labour-intensive, which suggests that there will be a significant number of employment opportunities created during the construction phase of this development.

• Provision of intra-annually stable employment opportunities Current unskilled and semi-skilled employment opportunities in the De Doorns area are mainly associated with the agricultural sector. A large number of these opportunities are seasonal in nature, resulting in high rates of seasonal unemployment. This situation has been severely aggravated by the passing of ESTA (Extension of Security of Tenure Act 1997) which resulted in many farm labourers and their families losing tenure on farms and having to move to the nearest town. They thus constitute a large pool of unskilled seasonally unemployed people in rural Boland towns such as De Doorns. Employment opportunities associated with the operational phase of the proposed development (e.g. gardening, security, housekeeping) are not seasonally determined, and can therefore make a contribution to the community as a whole. In addition, the economic multiplier effects of a potential increase of 38 higher-income households in De Doorns may be expected to benefit various local retail and service providers, and thus provide a stimulus to employment creation. This is in line with one of the development goals stated in the Breede Valley 2006/ 2007 IDP, viz. to promote the development of second-tier retail and services centres outside of Worcester.

The following aspects are linked to the desirability of the proposed development

• Supported by relevant local planning documents The proposed development is in line with the guidelines of the Breede Valley Municipality and the Provincial Administration of the Western Cape.

• Complementary use of the area The proposed development will complement existing land-uses and facilities in the area.

• Socio-economic integration The proposed development will allow for socio-economic integration, as it is close to existing farm labourer housing. It will thus allow for the integration of different economic classes, who will be living together during the operational phase of the development. The proposed development will thus make an alternative form of housing available in the area. Traditional houses for retirees and urban-dwellers will be developed, and this will result in socio-economic integration.

• The ‘sense of place’ will be retained The development will not change the character or atmosphere of De Doorns. The proposed development will use traditional ‘Cape Dutch’ architectural elements that will combine harmoniously with existing buildings in the area.

• No negative traffic impacts The proposed development is not expected to have any impact on traffic flow.

• Minimal aesthetic impacts



The proposed development should have minimal aesthetic impacts, as the Developer intends to adhere to strict architectural guidelines that will ensure that houses are built in the ‘Cape Dutch’ style, which should maintain the aesthetic appeal of the area.

• Minimal impact on agricultural productivity

The portion of the farm that would be occupied by the proposed development is the least valuable from an agricultural point of view. The Remainder portion of the farm will remain under cultivation, and will thus retain its present productivity and continue to provide employment to labourers.

(b) Indicate the benefits that the activity will have for society in general and also indicate the benefits

that the activity will have for the local communities where the activity will be located:

Benefits for society in general are associated with the following:

• No specific benefits for society in general are associated with the proposed development. ii). Benefits for the larger community are associated with the following:

• Contribution towards municipal service provision capacity: The Developer will make a financial contribution of between R20 000 to R30 000 per erf (x 38 erven = R760 000 to R1 140 000) towards the implementation of Water and Sewerage Master Plans in the relevant area.

• Employment opportunities during the construction phase. While the appointment of contractors for the development of services infrastructure, etc. is contingent on approval, indications at this stage are that contractors in the De Doorns and Worcester area will be appointed. Furthermore, a significant number of skilled construction labourers exist locally and would therefore, in most likelihood, be employed during the construction phase.. A subsequent R700 000 (at current value) would therefore accrue to local communities in terms of labour. Given the relatively small scale and short duration of the project, skills training (i.e. of new labourers) would however not be economically viable.

• Stimulus to local building supplies manufacturing industry: A large number of building supplies manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers are located in Worcester. In as far as transportation costs are a significant factor in construction, it is assumed that building materials and supplies will be obtained from local suppliers.

• Contribution to rates and taxes base: The 38 residential units would contribute to the local rates and taxes base. Each completed unit is expected to contribute between R 3 000 and R 4 000 annually at current value. The resulting yield would entail an amount of between R117 000 to R156 000.

• Operational phase employment: During the operational phase, a number of employment opportunities (e.g. security, gardening, maintenance and domestic work) will be created. These associated employment opportunities will provide important stable employment year round in a community which currently suffers from significant seasonal unemployment/ underemployment.



3. ALTERNATIVES Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Please Note:

1. This report only provides space for 3 alternatives. The required information must however be provided for all alternatives being considered. Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished. The determination of whether the site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. The no-go option must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of all alternatives are assessed.

2. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.

3. Consult the Department’s Guideline on Alternatives prior to completing this section.

3(a) Site alternatives: Please indicate the number of site alternatives assessed Describe site alternative 1 (S1) (preferred or only site alternative), for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:

Erf 660 (the Property) lies just outside the developed areaof the town of De Doorns in the Breede Valley Muinicipality. De Doorns is situated immediately to the north of the N1, approximately 32 km north-east of Worcester. The Property consists of a single, polygon-shaped land parcel, approximately 28.93 hectares in size. Residential development, the “De Doorns (Romanze) Estate”, is proposed on a 4.15 ha portion of the Property. The portion in question effectively constitutes the easternmost part of the main body of the Property, that is, the part closest to the built edge of De Doorns. The Hex River constitutes the north-western boundary of the Property. Adjacent land towards the north of the Property is mainly comprised of cultivated agricultural land. Adjacent land towards the west consists mainly of vineyards, but also accommodates the De Doorns municipal Wastewater Treatment Works (approximately 300 m west of the Property). The grounds of the De Doorns Valley golf club are situated immediately to the south, and the grounds of the Hex Valley Secondary School immediately towards the south-east of the Property. The entrance to, and a narrow trailing portion of the Property, are situated immediately west of Voortrekker road, De Doorns. The bulk of the Property is however situated approximately 300 m towards the west of the built edge. Current access to the Property is via a gravel road off Voortrekker road.



Describe site alternative 2 (S2), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:

An alternative site was not identified as the proposed Remainder of Erf 660 lies further from the developed area of De Doorns and has better soil and agricultural potential. 3(b) Activity alternatives:

Describe activity alternative 1 (A1), if any, for any or all of the site alternatives as appropriate:

The preferred alternative is to subdivide and rezone Erf 660 into two broad portions; Portion A and the Remainder. Portion A will be rezoned for Residential Zone I, Private Open Space II Zone and Transport Zone II zonings in terms of Article 8 of the Zoning Scheme Regulations provided for in the Provincial Land Use Planning Ordinance (15 of 1985), while the Remainder will remain under cultivation (vines). Portion A will subsequently be rezoned to accommodate 38 residential erven, private open space areas, associated access roads and infrastructure and the associated service infrastructure.

Describe activity alternative 2 (A2), if any, for any or all of the site alternatives as appropriate:

The No-Go option would be that there will be no housing development on Erf 660 and the proposed Portion A will remain under cultivation.

3(c) Other alternatives (e.g. layout, technological, timing, process etc):

Preferred layout option (Layout Option 1) – See Appendix B for Layout Plans

The preferred alternative would be to arrange the residential erven along the southern and south-western portion of the property. The erven would border the existing farm dam and run along the southern boundary of the property. This layout would entail the removal of the southernmost block of vines. ,. Five of the proposed erven will have a small portion below the 1 in 50 year floodline, however, these are the five largest erven in the proposed development. No actual building will be permitted below the 1 in 50 year floodline, with the exception of a motor and foot bridge (and enlarged culvert) over the existing channel that runs through the south western portion of the property. In the preferred layout the Erf sizes range between 525 m² and 725 m², with a mean size of approximately 600 m².

Alternative layout option (Layout Option 2) – See Appendix B for Layout Plans

An alternative layout option proposes a lint or ribbon development along the southern and eastern boundaries of the property, totaling 32 new erven. The existing farm dam would be retained, and no proposed erven are situated in the 1 in 50 year floodline.

Alternative layout option (Layout Option 3) – See Appendix B for Layout Plans

A third layout option is being considered. The alternative layout proposes a lint or ribbon development along the southern and eastern boundaries of the property, totaling 32 single residential erven, with an option for a separate vineyard village with an additional 8 erven. The existing farm dam would be retained, and no proposed erven are situated in the 1 in 50 year floodline.



4. ACTIVITY LOCATION

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates must be in degrees, minutes and seconds. The minutes should be given to at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.

Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):

Alternative S1 (preferred or only site alternative) 338

28‘ 42.53“ 19o 39‘ 35.31“

Alternative S2 (if any) o ‘ “

o ‘ “

Alternative S3 (if any) o ‘ “

o ‘ “

or, for linear activities:

Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):

Alternative S1 (preferred or only route alternative)

• Starting point of the activity o ‘ “

o ‘ “

• Middle point of the activity o ‘ “

o ‘ “

• End point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “

Alternative S2 (if any)

• Starting point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “

• Middle point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “


‘ “ o

‘ “

Alternative S3 (if any)

• Starting point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “

• Middle point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “


‘ “ o

‘ “

Please Note: For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide and addendum with co-ordinates taken every

100 meters along the route for each alternative.

5. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity as well as alternative activities and its associated infrastructure (footprints):

Alternative: Size of the activity:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 41500m2

Alternative A2 (if any) m2


or, for linear activities: Alternative: Length of the activity:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m

Alternative A2 (if any) m

Alternative A3 (if any) m

Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur):

Alternative: Size of the

site/servitude:




Associated Infrastructure: Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above associated infrastructure footprints will occur):

Alternative: Size of the

site/servitude:






6. SITE ACCESS

Is there an existing access road? YES �� NO

If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built? ±250 m

Describe the type of access road planned:

Two access options are being considered for the Development. The preferred entrance alternative is from Le Serene Street on the western side of the development, adjacent to the municipal Golf Course. This access road would entail the upgrading of the existing road (currently a concrete strip road) and formalizing the existing gravel roads on the property. The second entrance alternative is to access the development from Voortrekker Road in De Doorns. This option calls for formalizing the existing unpaved access road from Voortrekker road onto the Property. This option may necessitate an upgrade of the current intersection in order to improve sight distances in the interest of road use safety. In addition, the entrance would have to be shifted approximately 35 metres, to opposite Barlinka Street. See Appendix D for site photographs of each alternative.

Please Note: indicate the position of the proposed access road on the site plan (See Section 7 below)



7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Colour photographs of the site and its surroundings (taken of the site and from the site) with a description of each photograph. The vantage points from which the photographs were taken must be indicated on the site plan, or locality plan as applicable. If available, please also provide a recent aerial photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix D to this form. It should be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site. Date of photographs must be included. Please note that the above requirements must be duplicated for all alternative sites.

8. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES Please list all legislation, policies and/or guidelines that have or wi ll be considered in the preparation of this application.

LEGISLATION ADMINISTERING

AUTHORITY

TYPE Permit/ license/

authorization/comment

DATE (if already obtained):

National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism

Considered legislation, this application

Regulations in terms of Chapter 5 of the National Environmental , GN R 385, R 386 and R 387 2006

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism / DEA&DP Chief Directorate Environment and Land Management

Considered legislation, this application

National Heritage Resources Act 25 of 1999: Sections 34, 35 and 38

South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) / Heritage Western Cape

Consolidated Record of Decision / Authorisation (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses and Supporting Letters)

29/10/2007

Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970

Department of Agriculture / Department of Agriculture -Western Cape

Support / Authorisation (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses and Supporting Letters)

POLICY/ GUIDELINES ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY

Guideline on Public Participation (2009) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on Alternatives (2009) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on the Interpretation of the Listed Activities (2006)

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Provincial Urban Edge Guideline (2005) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline for Involving Heritage Specialists in EIA Processes (2005)


Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework (2005)


Breede Valley Spatial Development Framework (2007)

Breede Valley Municipality

Guideline on Transitional Arrangements (May 2009)




SECTION B: DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT Site/Area Description For linear activities (pipelines etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary to complete copies of this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section B and indicate the area which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.

Section B Copy No. (e.g. A):

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE

Indicate the general gradient of the sites (tick the appropriate box). Alternative S1:

Flat �� Flatter than 1:10 1:10 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5 Alternative S2:

Flat Flatter than 1:10 1:10 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5 Alternative S3:

Flat Flatter than 1:10 1:10 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5



2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site (tick (“�“) the appropriate box(es).

Alternative S1:

Ridgeline Plateau Side slope

of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley ��

Plain Undulating plain/low

hills Dune

Sea-front

Other

Alternative S2:


of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley

Plain Undulating

plain/low hills Dune

Sea- front

Other

Alternative S3:


of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley

Plain Undulating

plain/low hills Dune

Sea-front

Other

If other, please describe

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE Is the site(s) located on or near any of the following (tick (“�”) the appropriate boxes)?

Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep)

YES NO ��

UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Seasonally wet soils (often close to water bodies)

YES NO ��


Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with loose soil

YES NO ��


Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water)

YES NO ��


Soils with high clay content YES NO ��


Any other unstable soil or geological feature

YES NO ��


An area sensitive to erosion

YES NO ��


If any of the answers to the above are “YES” or “unsure”, specialist input may be requested by the Department. (Information in respect of the above will often be available at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by Geological Survey may also be used).

4. SURFACE WATER Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites (tick (“�”) the appropriate boxes)?

Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

Perennial River YES ��

NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Non-Perennial River YES ��

NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Permanent Wetland YES NO ��




Seasonal Wetland YES NO ��


Artificial Wetland YES NO ��


Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland

YES NO ��


5. VEGETATION / GROUNDCOVER Tick (“�”) and describe (where required) the vegetation types / groundcover present on the site. Alternative S1:

Indigenous Vegetation - good condition

Indigenous Vegetation with scattered aliens

Indigenous Vegetation with heavy alien infestation

Identify the vegetation type above: Not applicable



Provide ecosystem status for above: Not applicable

Provide ecosystem status for above: Not applicable

Provide Ecosystem status for above: Not applicable

Indigenous Vegetation in an ecological corridor or along a

soil boundary / interface

Veld dominated by alien species

Distinctive soil conditions (e.g. Sand over shale, quartz patches,

limestone, alluvial deposits, termitaria etc.) – describe

Bare soil

Building or other structure

�� Sport field

Paved surface

Cultivated land ��

Other (describe)

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the vegetation type /

groundcover and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. To assist with the identification of the vegetation type and ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.org or [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GIS Unit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/ EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used.



6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA

Tick (“�”) the current land uses and/or prominent features that occur within +/- 500m radius of the site and neighbouring properties if these are located beyond 500m of the site. Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies

depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.

Alternative S1:

Untransformed area

Low density residential

��

Medium density residential

��

High density residential

Informal residential

Retail ��

Commercial & warehousing

�� Light industrial Medium industrial

Heavy industrial

Power station Office/consulting

room Military or police

base/station/compound Casino/entertainment

complex

Tourism & Hospitality

facility ��

Open cast mine Underground

mine Spoil heap or slimes

dam Quarry, sand or

borrow pit

Dam or reservoir

��

Hospital/medical center School

�� Tertiary education

facility

Church ��

Old age home

Sewage treatment plant ��

Train station or shunting yard

Railway line Major road (4 lanes

or more) Airport

Harbour

Sport facilities ��

Golf course ��

Polo fields Filling station

Landfill or waste treatment site

Plantation Agriculture

��

River, stream or wetland

��

Nature conservation

area

Mountain, koppie or ridge

Museum Historical building

�� Graveyard

�� Archeological

site

Other land uses (describe):

Alternative S2: Not applicable Alternative S3: Not applicable



7. REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT

Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existing land use rights? Please explain

An application for rezoning is required i.e. from Agriculture Zone I use to a Subdivision Area, and subsequently rezoning to Residential Zone I, Private Open Space II Zone and Transport Zone II zonings in terms of Article 8 of the Zoning Scheme Regulations provided for in the Provincial Land Use Planning Ordinance (15 of 1985),

Will the activity be in line with the following?

Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES NO Please explain

The Provincial Spatial Development Framework (2005) identifies De Doorns as a town in need to social investment. De Doorns also forms part of the N1 Regional Transport Corridor, which enhances the development potential of the town. De Doorns is identified as an area with a high need for fixed investment, but with low development potential. The proposed development will be within walking distance of the town CBD centre, which is recommended by the PSDF. The PSDF also states that permanently cultivated lands should be protected from urban development. However, this development is still in line with the PSDF, as it complies with the four-stage test discussed under Stage One of the Action plan, biodiversity conservation (Objective 8.4.32 of the Vision, Objectives, Strategies, Policies and Action Plans section of the PSDF) in that it

a) Undertake a biodiversity, social and economic evaluation according to the Key Performance Indicators of

the Triple Bottom Line Relationship Framework so as to assess the application’s social benefits and economic potential while retaining the integrity of the environmental system

The social, economic and environmental impacts of the proposed development are investigated through the environmental impact assessment process and are addressed in this Basic Assessment Report.

b) Incorporate a ‘Design with Nature’ approach to site planning that locates buildings in the least environmentally sensitive land in nodal rather than dispersed patterns.

The proposed development will take place on the least valuable agricultural land, and both the preferred and alternative layout plans are nodal.

c) Demonstrate an Environmentally Sustainable approach to building design

Building design will also focus on overall sustainability, including water and energy efficiency. Solar water heaters and water-saving taps, showers, etc. will be mandatory under the architectural guidelines.

d) Be located on or within current building footprints except in properties where there were not previously building footprints or it can be effectively demonstrated that buildings will not create a negative visual or resource impact in terms of water, waste, building materials and energy services, and;

The proposed development will fall outside the current building footprint of De Doorns, and the Developer intends to enforce strict architectural guidelines to insure that the development does not have a negative visual impact or detract from the historic sense of place. The Developer is also supplying additional water to the Municipality in order to offset the water demands of the proposed development. Energy- and water efficiency are design elements of the proposed houses.

e) Respect rural/townscapes and identified heritage resources

The Developer will implement and enforce architectural guidelines to minimise the visual impact of the proposed development on the rural townscape of De Doorns.

Stages Two, Three of the Action Plan, biodiversity conservation, would appear not to apply to this development as they relate explicitly to biodiversity conservation and offsets. The proposed development will not affect local biodiversity. In terms of Stage Four, this development is unlikely to set a precedent as the proposed development area adjoins the urban edge and will not require a large change in the urban edge designation to be accommodated.



Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES �� NO Please explain

De Doorns does not have a formally defined urban edge. The suggested urban edge follows a fairly arbitrary line around the property, even touching the Voortrekker Road, the main road through the town at one point. The suggested urban edge also excludes the current municipal sewage works. The proposed development falls just outside the urban edge, but is nevertheless close to the centre of De Doorns and will be close to existing residential areas. Erf 660 is classified as a town erf, and is supplied with municipal services, which suggests that the erf is considered to lie within the urban edge. A logical urban edge would include the proposed Portion A of Erf 660.

Integrated Development Plan of the Local Municipality YES �� NO Please explain

The current IDP Review document identifies job creation and access to housing as the two most critical areas of development. The proposed development aims to contribute to both areas, while also improving the availability of services and increasing the municipality’s tax base (Breede Valley Municipality, IDP Review 2007 / /2011).

Spatial Development Framework of the Local Municipality YES �� NO Please explain

The Breede Valley Municipality SDF proposal for De Doorns (2003) shows a suggested urban edge that excludes Erf 660 in its entirety. However, this urban edge has not been formalised, and (as stated previously, Erf 660 is a Municipal erf and not a farm. The Broad Brush Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework (2003) earmarks the proposed Portion A for “urban development (mainly local town)”. However, part of the Erf 660 is also marked for intensive agricultural use.

Approved Structure Plan of the Municipality YES NO Please explain

This is not applicable as De Doorns does not have an Approved Structure Plan

Any other Plans YES NO Please explain

Not applicable



8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT

Describe the existing social and economic characteristics of the community in order to provide baseline information.

The community of De Doorns constitutes the receiving environment. All data below are taken from Census 2001. De Doorns has a population of 8 676 people. The majority of people living in the area are either Coloured (46% of the population) or Black (44% of the population), while White people make up the remaining 9% of the population. The sex ratio is slightly skewed in favour of females, who comprise 53% of the population. Approximately 11% of the population have no formal education, while a further 41% of the population had only received a primary school level education (i.e. not beyond Grade 7). Approximately 37% of the population attended high school, but only 11% completed Grade 12. Only 3% of the population had received any tertiary education. The White population group tended to enjoy greater education levels, with over 50% completing Grade 12, compared to less than 10% of the Coloured and Black populations. Employment levels are generally low, with only 28% of the population being employed, and 14% being unemployed. A large proportion of the population (35%) are not economically active as they are younger than 15 or older than 65, which places an additional burden on those who are employed. Approximately 7% of the population are scholars or students, while a further 7% are seasonal workers who were unemployed at the time of the census. Employment levels ar highest amongst the white population (37%) and lowest among the Black population (28%). Elementary occupations (most likely linked to Agriculture) are the single biggest employment sector, employing 16% of the population, while a further 2% of the population are described as ‘Skilled agriculture workers’. However, the vast majority of the population (72%) are not economically active. A high proportion of the population are younger than 19, with 41% of the population falling into this category, while 54% of the population are aged between 20 and 64. Only 5% of the population are 65 or older. There is a large disparity between the different racial groups, with 0-19 year-olds making up over 40% of both the Coloured and Black populations, while this group only comprises 25% of the White population. The White population group has the highest proportion of people older than 65 (± 23%), compared to the Black and Coloured populations, where less than 4% of the population were older than 65.

9. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES Please be advised that if section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act 25 of 1999 is applicable to your proposed development, then you are requested to furnish this Department with written comment from Heritage Western Cape as part of your public participation process. Section 38 of the Act states as follows: 38. (1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (7), (8) and (9), any person who intends to undertake a development categorised as- (a) the construction of a road, wall, power line, pipeline, canal or other similar form of linear development or barrier exceeding

300m in length; (b) the construction of a bridge or similar structure exceeding 50m in length; (c) any development or other activity which will change the character of a site- (i) exceeding 5 000 m2 in extent; or (ii) involving three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof; or (iii) involving three or more erven or divisions thereof which have been consolidated within the past five years; or (iv) the costs of which will exceed a sum set in terms of regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources

authority; (d) the re-zoning of a site exceeding 10 000 m2 in extent; or (e) any other category of development provided for in regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources authority, must

at the very earliest stages of initiating such a development, notify the responsible heritage resources authority and furnish it with details regarding the location, nature and extent of the proposed development.



Alternative S1:

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements including archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or in close proximity to the site?

YES �� NO

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain:

The existing homestead on Erf 660 is a National Monument. The homestead will not be affected by the proposed development.

If uncertain, the Department may request that specialist input be provided to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.

Briefly explain the findings of the specialist if one was already appointed:

Two heritage assessments were conducted on Erf 660 (see attached reports in Appendix G). The Heritage Impact Assessment done by the Ron Martin Heritage Consultancy found that the significant heritage indicators on Erf 660 are the manor house and the social significance of the site. The specialist found that the development would have no impact on the manor house, and that the social value of the site was relatively insignificant in relation to the provincial estate. The Agency for Cultural Resource Management did an Archaeological Impact Assessment for the proposed development and found that the archaeological remains on the site are of low local significance. The study found that the impact of the proposed development on archaeological heritage would be low. Both specialists concluded that the development would have a low impact on the heritage resources on the property, and that the development be allowed to proceed subject to certain recommendations.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO ��

Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES �� NO

If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submit the necessary application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to this application.

Alternative S2: Not applicable

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site?

YES NO

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain:

If uncertain, the Department may request that specialist input be provided to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.

Briefly explain the findings of the specialist if one was already appointed:

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way?

YES NO

Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO

If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submit the necessary application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to this application.

Basic Assessment Report for the proposed Romanze Estate, Portion A of Erf 660, De

Basic Assessment Report for the proposed Romanze Estate, Portion A of Erf 660, De



SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Please note: The information in this section must be duplicated for all the alternatives (where relevant).

1. WASTE, EFFLUENT AND EMISSION MANAGEMENT

(a) Solid waste management

Will the activity produce solid waste (including ru



Will any effluent produced be treated and/or disposed of on site? Yes NO ��

If yes, briefly describe the nature of the effluent and how it will be disposed of: Not applicable

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility? YES NO ��

If yes, has this facility confirmed that sufficient capacity exist for treating / disposing of the liquid effluent to be generated by this activity(ies)? Provide written confirmation from the facility and provide the following particulars of the facility:

YES NO

Does the facility have an operating license? (If yes, please attach a copy of the license.) YES NO Facility name: Not applicable

Contact person: Not applicable

Postal address: Not applicable

Postal code:

Telephone: Cell:

E-mail: Fax:

Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

(c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity produce emissions that will be disposed of into the atmosphere? YES NO ��

If yes, does it require approval in terms of relevant legislation? YES NO Describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration and how it will be treated/mitigated:

Not applicable 2. WATER USE

Please indicate the source(s) of water for the activity by ticking (“a”) the appropriate box(es)

Municipal ��

Water board

Groundwater River, Stream, Dam or Lake

Other The activity will not use

water

If water is to be extracted from a groundwater source, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that

will be extracted per month: 0 m3

Please provide proof of assurance of water supply eg. Letter of confirmation from municipality / water user associations, yield of borehole

Does the activity require a water use permit / license from DWAF? YES NO ��

If yes, please submit the necessary application to Department of Water Affairs and Forestry and attach proof thereof to this application.

3. POWER SUPPLY Please indicate the source of power supply eg. Municipality / Eskom / Renewable energy source

Municipality



If power supply is not available, where will power be sourced from? Not Applicable.



4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient:

Energy efficiency will be one of the features of the proposed development.

• The architectural guidelines will stipulate that all houses use energy efficient devices such as solar water heaters and energy-efficient lightbulbs will be used for all internal and external lighting.

• Use of solar power will also be encouraged.

• The use of gas-powered ovens and stoves will also be encouraged. The Estate Guidelines (prepared by Van Biljon Barnardo Architects (Pty) Ltd) describes a Modern Cape Vernacular architectural language that contains inherent energy efficiency with:

• pitched roofs (ceiling void insulation)

• stoeps and pergolas (shading devices)

• Masonry cavity wall construction (high mass and cavity insulation)

• Shutters (shading devices)

• Natural building materials (stone, reed, thatch etc.)

• Indigenous planting

• Minimal cut and fill to natural site contours

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any:

All houses in the development will make use of alternative energy, e.g. solar power. This will be mandatory under the architectural guidelines for the development.

5. NOISE IMPACTS

Will the activity result in any noise impacts during the construction phase? YES ��

NO

If yes, please describe and indicate the measures proposed to mitigate and manage these impacts?

Normal levels of noise, associated with heavy earth-moving and construction vehicles are anticipated. Apart from the usual mitigating effects of well-maintained exhaust silencers, the Developer will also restrict work to normal day-time hours (ie. 08h00 – 17h:00). No heavy machinery should operate on Saturdays, Sundays, or on public holidays.

Will the activity result in any noise impacts during its operational phase? YES NO ��

If yes, please describe and indicate the measures proposed to mitigate and manage these impacts? Not applicable. The Homeowners Association will ensure that any noise from individual houses is kept to an acceptable level.

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential noise impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.

6. VISUAL IMPACTS



Will the activity result in any visual impacts? YES ��

NO

If yes, please describe and indicate the measures proposed to mitigate and manage these impacts?

• A visual corridor will be maintained to the declared heritage resource (the homestead).

• The roofs of units situated behind the farm dam should not protrude above the dam wall.

• Trees should be planted where appropriate to further screen the development.

• Massing, proportions and scale of buildings as well as use of colour of walls should be sympathetic to the rural character of the local area.

•

Will the activity result in potential lighting impacts at night? YES ��

NO

If yes, please describe and indicate the measures proposed to mitigate and manage these impacts? Low energy streetlights will be used only where necessary, and these will face downwards to minimize light pollution. The Home Owners association will further control the use and nature of exterior lighting on individual houses during the Operational Phase.

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential visual impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.



7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACTIVITY

What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? ± R 57 million

The figure of R57 million was provided by the Developer, and includes the estimated value of the 38 residential plots, dwellings and associated service infrastructure.

What is the expected yearly income or contribution to the economy that will be generated by or as a result of the activity?

± R 150 000

Judging by the municipal profile, the resultant 38 residential between R 3 000 and R 4 000 annually at current value. The resulting yield would entail an amount of between R 114 000 and R 152 000.

Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES ��

NO

An agreed capital contribution of will be made towards upgrading of municipal services in De Doorns.

How many new employment opportunities will be created in the construction phase of the activity?

± 30

What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the construction phase?

R 720 000

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? 80%

How will this be ensured and monitored (please explain):

Previously disadvantaged individual (PDI) numbers will be specified in all tender documents and monitored by site management. Compliance will be ensured by inspections by the Department of Labour.

How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity?

± 15

What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years?

R 3 000 000

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? 100 %

How will this be ensured and monitored (please explain):

The homeowners association will monitor this, but compliance will also be ensured by inspections by the Department of Labour..



8. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the planning, design and construction phase for the various alternatives of the proposed development. This must include an assessment of the significance of all impacts.

Alternative S1 (preferred activity alternative – Layout Option One – 38 erven)

Potential impacts:

Significance rating of impacts (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):

Proposed mitigation:

Significance rating of impacts after mitigation(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):

Faunal biodiversity

Loss of species and habitats (Birds, Rodents and Reptiles) due to land transformation. It is unlikely that this development will have any significant impact on faunal biodiversity, as the proposed development site is currently under cultivation. It is possible that the vineyards currently on the site may provide habitat for some birds and reptiles. However, most of the property will remain under vines, and thus this development will not result in significant habitat loss.

Low

Any wild animals that are found on the construction site should be moved without harm or hindrance to the far end of the farm to reduce the risk of further disturbance and injury during the construction phase.

Low

Floral biodiversity

Loss of floral species due to land transformation The proposed development site is currently under cultivation, and therefore the proposed development will not result in any loss of floral biodiversity

None Not applicable None



Floral ecosystem - loss of habitat The development will result in the loss of approximately 4.15 hectares of vineyards, which may provide a habitat to various micro and macro-fauna. However, the majority of the farm (± 24 hectares) will remain under vines, and this will continue to provide habitat to whatever fauna are currently associated with the vineyards.


Agriculture – loss of agricultural land

The land which the proposed development would occupy is currently under vines, and therefore this development would result in the loss of about 4.15 hectares of agricultural land.

Low

An agricultural potential study was conducted on Erf 660, which found that the affected land is less suitable for agriculture than the remainder of the property. This suggests that the loss of this land will not have a large effect on the productivity of the table grape estate.

Low

Hydrological – storm water system

Initially storm water runoff will be as per natural, i.e. infiltration into soils. The construction of roads, associated impacting of soils and land transformation will result in higher levels of storm water runoff with the possibility of increased erosion and decline in water quality.

Low

Storm water runoff generated within the development will be accommodated within the internal storm water networks which will consist of underground pipes sized to accommodate 1:2 year storms. These pipes will discharge into the existing ground canal on the southern side of the site, which may be formalized and shaped to accommodate larger storms. It is envisaged that the proposed development will not generate large amounts of additional storm water drainage, and that this should drain into the existing streams which flow into the Hex river.

Low



Hydrological – water supply There is existing bulk water infrastructure in close proximity to the proposed development site. However, the impact of the proposed development on existing infrastructure has yet to be determined. The Breede Valley Municipality has a shortage of water in the De Doorns area, and as such all new developments are required to provide a water right sufficient to meet the demands of the provided development.

High

Subject to approval from the Department of Environmental Affairs anf Development Planning, the Applicant will appoint CES Consulting Engineers to analyse the potential impact of the proposed development on the existing bulk water supply infrastructure. Erf 660 shares water from a mountain stream with the Breede Valley Municipality, in the proportions of a 116/168 portion being the municipality’s and the remaining 52/168 being allocated to Erf 660. Kwezi-V3 Engineers calculated that Erf 660’s portion of the mountain stream is sufficient to provide a reliable water supply to offset the water demands of the proposed development. Erf 660 will therefore cede, by means of a title deed registration,

the right to the first 1.33 ℓ/s of flow of Erf 660’s right to the mountain stream to the Breede Valley Municipality. This will provide the municipality with a total of 17 520 m

3 per year, which

will offset the estimated water demand of the proposed development (17 520 m

3 per

year). See Appendix F for supporting documentation. Construction personnel will be instructed not to waste water during the construction phase of the development

Low



Hydrological – drainage canal A drainage canal runs along the south/ south-eastern side of the property. This could potentially be damaged or polluted during the construction phase of the activity.

Medium

The Developer will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the construction phase. The Developer may actually formalize and upgrade the (currently ground) canal to ensure that it can accommodate storm water drainage from large, 1 in 50 year storm events. In addition, the existing culvert on the property will be upgraded to accommodate greater flows and to reduce the risk of flooding (see floodline assessment report by Sinske Consult in Appendix G)

Low

Hydrological – farm dam

The proposed development will involve constructing houses close to the existing farm dam. The dam is too small to be registered with the Department of Water Affairs, however a dam safety engineer was appointed to compile a report describing the associated risks.

Low

All due care will be taken to ensure that the dam wall is not damaged during the construction process. Routine maintenance checks will be done to ensure that the dam remains in good condition. (see Operational Phase below) As per the recommendations made by Aurecon South Africa in the Dam Safety Evaluation (see Appendix G) an enlarged drainage pipe will replace the existing pipe. A sand/finger drainage system will be installed on the portion of the wall above the pumphouse. The vegetation on the portion of the wall above the pumphouse should be cut short to allow for inspection. The water next to the outlet pipe must be drained so that seepage next to the pipe can be assessed

Low

Waste – Sewage/ Effluent Very little sewage will be generated during the construction phase.

Low

Portable toilets will be supplied for personnel during the construction phase of the development. Thereafter, the development will be connected to the municipal sewage system (see Operational Phase below)



Waste – Building rubble and littering

Littering by construction personnel may occur during the construction phase. It is estimated that around 150 m

3 of

building rubble will be generated during the construction phase of the roads, perimeter fence and supporting infrastructure for the development Houses on the 38 residential ervfen will be built over a period of 1-3 years after authorization is granted. Building waste will thus continually be generated (albeit in small quantities) over this period.

Low

The building waste will be transported at the Building Contractors/ Developers cost to the nearest municipal landfill site. Waste and litter drums will be placed at strategic points for use by personnel. The drums will be regularly emptied and waste removed to the municipal landfill site. The municipality should ensure that municipal by-laws regarding waste disposal are upheld by the single residential home owners and their builders. The Developer will display an all-hours telephone number on the site for emergency calls or complaints.

Low

Land transformation – Dust Levels

Increased dust levels due to the earthmoving activities and movement of vehicles may impact on air quality and possibly surrounding cultivated lands

Low

The Developer should ensure that dust levels are kept to a minimum by exposing only those areas to be developed. The Developer will display an all-hours telephone number on the site for emergency calls or complaints.

Low

Land transformation – Noise Levels

Increased noise levels due to earthmoving and construction equipment, which may potentially impact on nearby residential neighbourhoods.

Low

The Developer will ensure that noise levels are kept to a minimum by limiting operation of heavy earthmoving equipment and construction activities to normal working hours, and to normal work days (i.e. Monday to Friday, between 08:00 and 17:00) Silencers (sound bafflers) will be used to ensure effective sound dampening. The Developer will display an all-hours telephone number on site for emergency calls or complaints.

Low



Land transformation – Visual impacts Clearing of vineyards for the construction of roads and other service infrastructure as well as the construction of the individual houses will have a visual impact. Street lighting will be installed where necessary within the development.

Medium

Only those areas where construction is going to take place will be cleared. Fast-growing indigenous trees should be planted along streets and in public open spaces. Street lighting should face downward to minimize light pollution.

Low

Increased levels of traffic The transportation of construction material will increase traffic in Voortrekker Street during the construction phase. However this is unlikely to have any significant impact on traffic flows. The development will primarily be accessed from the entrance on Le Serene Street, close to the municipal golf course.

Low

The Developer will ensure that traffic flow is not impeded by avoiding the transportation of materials during peak traffic hours of 07:00-08:00 and 16:00 and 17:00. In the preferred entrance option , a section of concrete strip road would be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles and residents during both the construction and operational phases of the development. The alternative entrance option would require more significant realignments of the entrance and roadways to ensure traffic safety.

Low



Heritage resources

Archaeological heritage resources on the site were found to be of low local significance. It is improbable that any locally significant archaeological remains will be found during construction. The historic farmhouse will not be affected by the proposed development, which is situated a significant distance away. The development is also expected to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding area.

Low

If any human remains are uncovered, exposed or disturbed during the construction phase, these should immediately be reported to the South African Heritage Resources Agency, and should not be removed until inspected by an archaeologist. A visual corridor will be maintained to the declared heritage resource (the homestead). The roofs of units situated behind the farm dam should not protrude above the dam wall. Trees should be planted where appropriate to further screen the development. Massing, proportions and scale of buildings as well as use of colour of walls should be sympathetic to the rural character of the local area.

Low



Alternative S2 – Layout option Two - 32 erven in a ribbon layout

Potential impacts:

Significance rating of impacts(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):



Faunal biodiversity


Low


Low

Floral biodiversity



Floral ecosystem - loss of habitat The development will result in the loss of approximately 4.15 hectares of vineyards, which may provide a habitat to various micro and macrofauna. However, the majority of the farm (± 24 hectares) will remain under vines, and this will continue to provide habitat to whatever fauna are currently associated with the vineyards.





The land which the proposed development would occupy is currently under vines, and therefore this development would result in the loss of agricultural land. However, the amount of land that would be lost would be substantially less than in the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1).

Low

An agricultural potential study was conducted on Erf 660, which found that the affected land is less suitable for agriculture than the remainder of the property. This suggests that the loss of this land will not have a large effect on the productivity of Erf 660.

Low



Low


Low



Hydrological – water supply There is existing bulk water infrastructure in close proximity to the proposed development site. However, the impact of the proposed development on existing infrastructure has yet to be determined. The Breede Valley has a shortage of water in the De Doorns area, and as such all new developments are required to provide a water right sufficient to meet the demands of the provided development.

High

The Local Authority has appointed an independent company to analyse the potential impact of the proposed development on the existing bulk water supply infrastructure. Erf 660 shares water from a mountain stream with the municipality, in the proportions of a 116/168 portion being the municipality’s and the remaining 52/168 being allocated to Erf 660. Kwezi-V3 Engineers have calculated that Erf 660’s portion of the mountain stream is sufficient to provide a reliable water supply to offset the water demands of the proposed development. Erf 660 will therefore cede, by means of a title deed registration,

the right to the first 1.33 ℓ/s of flow of Erf 660’s right to the mountain stream to the municipality. This will provide the municipality with a total of 14 753 m

3 per year, which will offset the

estimated water demand of the proposed development (14 753 m

3 per year).

Construction personnel will be instructed not to waste water during the construction phase of the development

Low

Hydrological – drainage canal A drainage canal runs along the south/ south-eastern side of the property. This could potentially be damaged or polluted during the construction phase of the activity. This layout would involve construction along a greater length of the canal than would be the case in the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1), and this could increase the risk of the canal being damaged or blocked.

Medium

The Developer will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the construction phase. The Developer may formalize and upgrade the (currently ground) canal to ensure that it can accommodate storm water drainage from large, 1 in 50 year storm events. In addition, the existing culvert on the property will be upgraded to accommodate greater flows and to reduce the risk of flooding (see floodline assessment report by Sinske Consult in Appendix G)

Low




The proposed development will involve constructing houses close to the existing farm dam. The dam is too small to be registered with the Department of Water Affairs, however a dam safety engineer was appointed to compile a report describing the associated risks (see Appendix G).

Low


Low


Low


Low





3 of

building rubble will be generated during the construction phase of the roads, perimeter fence and supporting infrastructure for the development Houses on the 32 residential erfen will be built over a period of 1-3 years after authorization is granted. Building waste will thus continually be generated (albeit in small quantities) over this period.

Low


Low



Low


Low



Low


Low



Land transformation – Visual impacts Clearing of vineyards for the construction of roads and other service infrastructure as well as the construction of the individual houses will have a visual impact. The development is expected to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding area. However, this layout is less compact than the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1) and is thus likely to have a greater visual impact. Street lighting will be installed where necessary within the development.

Medium


Low

Increased levels of traffic In the preferred entrance option , a section of concrete strip road would be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles and residents during both the construction and operational phases of the development.

Low

The alternative entrance option would require more significant realignments of the entrance and roadways to ensure traffic safety.

Low

Heritage resources

Archaeological heritage resources on the site were found to be of low local significance. It is improbable that any locally significant archaeological remains will be found during construction. The historic farmhouse will not be affected by the proposed development, which is situated a significant distance away.

Low


Low



Alternative S3 – Layout option Three – 32 erven in a ribbon layout plus 8 erven in a node

Potential impacts:




Faunal biodiversity


Low


Low

Floral biodiversity



Floral ecosystem - loss of habitat The development will result in the loss of approximately 4.15 hectares of vineyards, which may provide a habitat to various micro and macrofauna. However, the majority of the farm (± 24 hectares) will remain under vines, and this will continue to provide habitat to whatever fauna are currently associated with the vineyards.





The land which the proposed development would occupy is currently under vines, and therefore this development would result in the loss of about 4 hectares of agricultural land.

Low

An agricultural potential study was conducted on Erf 660, which found that the land on which the main strip of houses will be built is less suitable for agriculture than the remainder of the property. This suggests that the loss of this land will not have a large effect on the productivity of Erf 660. However, the proposed vineyard village complex will be located on more productive land in the middle of vineyards. This layout would thus have a greater impact on agricultural activities on Erf 660 than either the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1) or Layout Option 2.

Low



Low


Low



Hydrological – water supply There is existing bulk water infrastructure in close proximity to the proposed development site. However, the impact of the proposed development on existing infrastructure has yet to be determined. The Breede Valley has a shortage of water in the De Doorns area, and as such all new developments are required to provide a water right sufficient to meet the demands of the provided development.

High





3 per year).

Construction personnel will be instructed not to waste water during the construction phase of the development

Low



Hydrological – drainage canal A drainage canal runs along the south/ south-eastern side of the property. This could potentially be damaged or polluted during the construction phase of the activity.

Medium

The Developer will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the construction phase. The Developer may formalize and upgrade the (currently ground) canal to ensure that it can accommodate storm water drainage from large, 1 in 50 year storm events. The Developer will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the construction phase. The Developer may formalize and upgrade the (currently ground) canal to ensure that it can accommodate storm water drainage from large, 1 in 50 year storm events. In addition, the existing culvert on the property will be upgraded to accommodate greater flows and to reduce the risk of flooding (see floodline assessment report by Sinske Consult in Appendix G)

Low


The proposed development will involve constructing houses close to the existing farm dam. The dam is too small to be registered with the Department of Water Affairs, however a dam safety engineer was appointed to compile a report describing the associated risks.

Low


Low




Low




3 of

building rubble will be generated during the construction phase of the roads, perimeter fence and supporting infrastructure for the development Houses on the 40 residential erfen will be built over a period of 1-3 years after authorization is granted. Building waste will thus continually be generated (albeit in small quantities) over this period.

Low


Low



Low


Low





Low


Low

Land transformation – Visual impacts Clearing of vineyards for the construction of roads and other service infrastructure as well as the construction of the individual houses will have a visual impact. The development is also expected to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding area. However, this layout is less compact than the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1) and is thus likely to have a greater visual impact. Street lighting will be installed where necessary within the development.

Medium


Low

Increased levels of traffic The transportation of construction material will increase traffic in Voortrekker Street and le Serene Street during the construction phase. However this is unlikely to have any significant impact on traffic flows.

Low

The Developer will ensure that traffic flow is not impeded by avoiding the transportation of materials during peak traffic hours of 07:00-08:00 and 16:00 and 17:00. A section of concrete strip road would need to be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles and residents during both the construction and operational phases of the development.

Low



Heritage resources

Archaeological heritage resources on the site were found to be of low local significance. It is improbable that any locally significant archaeological remains will be found during construction. The historic farmhouse will not be affected by the proposed development, which is situated a significant distance away.

Low


Low

Alternative Activity – No Go option

Potential impacts:




Should the No Go option be implemented, the activity would, by definition, not involve any construction impacts. The sole possible impact of implementing the No Go option would be the loss of potential employment opportunities during the construction phase.

Medium

The local authority’s Local Economic Development policy would be tested to find alternative employment opportunities. Increased burden on state social security.

Low



9. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASE Briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the operational phase for the various alternatives of the proposed development. This must include an assessment of the significance of all impacts.

Alternative S1 (preferred activity alternative – Layout Option One – 38 erven)

Potential impacts:




Ecological impacts on flora and fauna No additional impacts are expected during the operational phase.


Impacts on agricultural resources

The development is not expected to have any impact on the agricultural activities occurring on the remainder of Erf 660 during the operational phase.



Land transformation due to the establishment of housing may result in higher levels of storm water runoff

Low


Low



Hydrological – water supply There is existing bulk water infrastructure in close proximity to the proposed development site. However, the impact of the proposed development on existing infrastructure has yet to be determined. It has been calculated that the proposed development will require 17

520 m3of water per year.

The Breede Valley has a shortage of water in the De Doorns area, and as such all new developments are required to provide a water right sufficient to meet the demands of the provided development. Sufficient bulk water supplies exist to supply the proposed 38 erven of the Romanze Estate development.

High





3 per year).

Dual-flush toilets, water-efficient showers and rainwater tanks will be used to reduce pressure on water supply infrastructure and minimize wastage of water.

Low



Hydrological – drainage canal A drainage canal runs along the south/ south-eastern side of the property. This could potentially be a hazard to nearby houses during the operational phase of the development.

Low

The Home Owners association will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the operational phase. The Developer may actually formalize and upgrade the (currently ground) canal to ensure that it can accommodate storm water drainage from large, 1 in 50 year storm events. The existing culvert on the property will be upgraded to accommodate greater flows and to reduce the risk of flooding (see floodline assessment report by Sinske Consult in Appendix G). Five of the proposed erven have small portions that lie below the 1 in 50 year floodline; however no building will be permitted below this, or the 1 in 100 year floodline.

Low




No impacts on the farm dam are expected during the operational phase. However, the dam does need to be monitored to ensure that the walls remain in good condition and that safety is not compromised.

Medium

Wave erosion on the slopes of the dam must be monitored and the walls restored when necessary. Seepage on the down-slope must be monitored for any increase, or local seepage such as ‘sandboils’. Any changes must be reported to a dam engineer immediately. The stability of the dam slope must be monitored. Seepage and erosion along the overflow pipe must be monitored, and the pipe must be kept clear. The valves on the outlet pipe must be fully opened and shut at least four times per year, and must be maintained so that they can open and shut when necessary. Trees must not be allowed to grow on the dam wall, and all vegetation must be kept low (1 metre high or less) to allow for inspection. The pipes that are buried in the top of the dam wall must remain in place.

Low

Waste – Sewage/ Effluent According to the report by Kwezi-V3 Engineers, preliminary investigations have shown that there is existing capacity within the existing sewage lines to accommodate the proposed development during its operational phase. The local wastewater treatment works have recently been upgraded, and have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development.

Low

The Breede Valley Municipality’s Civil Engineering Services state in their letter (dated 17 April 2009) that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate sewerage from the development.

Low



Waste – domestic

It is estimated that the proposed development will generate approximately 40 m

3 of solid waste

per month. This waste will need to be accommodated within the municipal stream.

Low

Domestic waste will be removed once a week as per the usual routine and disposed of at the Municipal landfill site. The municipality should ensure that municipal by-laws regarding waste disposal are upheld by the single residential home owners. Waste minimization measures, such as composting of vegetative waste and the recycling of paper, plastics, cans and glass, should be investigated by the Municipality and Home Owners association.

Low


The proposed development is not expected to significantly increase noise in the area during the operational phase.

Low

The Home Owners association will monitor noise levels within the development and ensure that these are kept at acceptable levels.

Low

Land transformation – Visual impacts In terms of the Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists in EIA Processes (DEA&DP Guidelines Series 2005), the only indicator triggered is that of the ‘change in land-use from the prevailing use’. The low to medium density residential development (Category 3 development) falls within an area that the heritage assessments conducted on Erf 660 suggest can be categorized as an ‘Area or route of low scenic, cultural, historical significance/ disturbed’. Therefore a ‘Minimal visual impact’ is expected. Street lighting will be installed where necessary within the development.

Low

Fast-growing indigenous trees should be planted along streets and in public open spaces. Street lighting should face downward to minimize light pollution.

Low



Increased levels of traffic The proposed development is not expected to have a major impact on traffic, and is unlikely to require upgrading of any intersections to accommodate the access road.

Low

No upgrades to intersections are envisaged for the proposed preferred entrance on Le Serene Street. A turning circle will be provided at the entrance to the development to accommodate refuse trucks, etc. A section of concrete strip road would need to be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles and residents during both the construction and operational phases of the development. If the alternative entrance is used, the existing gravel road will be formalized. The entrance to the development will be shifted 35 metres northwards to directly opposite Barlinka Street, and a portion of the neighbour’s wall will be moved to improved sightlines along Voortrekker Street.

Low

Heritage resources

The historic farmhouse will not be affected by the proposed development, which is situated a significant distance away. The development is also expected to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding area.

Low

A visual corridor will be maintained to the declared heritage resource (the homestead). Trees should be planted where appropriate to further screen the development.

Low

Alternative S2 – Layout option Two - 32 erven in a ribbon layout

Potential impacts:













Low


Low




753 m3 of water per year.


High

The Local Authority has appointed an independent company to analyse the potential impact of the proposed development on the existing bulk water supply infrastructure. Erf 660 shares water from a mountain stream with the municipality, in the proportions of a 116/168 portion being the municipality’s and the remaining 52/168 being allocated to Erf 660*. Kwezi-V3 Engineers have calculated that Erf 660’s portion of the mountain stream is sufficient to provide a reliable water supply to offset the water demands of the proposed development. Erf 660 will therefore cede, by means of a title deed registration,



estimated water demand of the proposed development. Dual-flush toilets, water-efficient showers and rainwater tanks will be used to reduce pressure on water supply infrastructure and minimize wastage of water. * please note that the exact portions may change depending on which layout option is preferred. This portion has been calculated to provide the water requirements of 38 residential erven (preferred alternative)

Low



Hydrological – drainage canal A drainage canal runs along the south/ south-eastern side of the property. This could potentially be a hazard to nearby houses during the operational phase of the development. This layout will result in more houses bordering the drainage canal than the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1), and is thus more likely to impact on the canal.

Medium

The Home Owners association will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the operational phase. Any structures put in place to smooth and shape the channel (gabions, etc.) should be checked annually. As recommended in the floodline assessment by Sinske Consult (see Appendix G), the channel must be kept clear of excessive vegetation, which should be cleared on an as-needs basis.

Low


No impacts on the farm dam are expected during the operational phase. However, the dam must be monitored to ensure that it does not become a hazard in future.

Medium


Low



Waste – Sewage/ Effluent According to the report by Kwezi-V3 Engineers, preliminary investigations have shown that there is existing capacity within the existing sewage lines to accommodate the proposed development during its operational phase. Several existing sewage plants are located in close proximity to the site of the proposed development. The local wastewater treatment works have recently been upgraded, and have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development.

Low

The Breede Valley Municipality’s Civil Engineering Services state in their letter (dated 17 April 2009) that there is sufficient unallocated capacity to accommodate the proposed development.

Low

Waste – domestic

It is estimated that the proposed development will generate approximately 35m

3 of solid waste per

month. This waste will need to be accommodated within the municipal stream.

Low


Low



Low


Low



Land transformation – Visual impacts In terms of the Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists in EIA Processes (DEA&DP Guidelines Series 2005), the only indicator triggered is that of the ‘change in land-use from the prevailing use’. The low to medium density residential development (Category 3 development) falls within an area that the heritage assessments conducted on Erf 660 suggest can be categorized as an ‘Area or route of low scenic, cultural, historical significance/ disturbed’. Therefore a ‘Minimal visual impact’ is expected. However, this proposed alternative layout will entail development of the area adjacent to the historic homestead on the property, which could result in greater visual impacts. Street lighting will be installed where necessary within the development.

Medium


Low


Low

No upgrades to intersections are envisaged for the proposed preferred entrance on le Serene Street. A turning circle will be provided at the entrance to the development to accommodate refuse trucks, etc. A section of concrete strip road would need to be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles and residents during both the construction and operational phases of the development. If the alternative entrance is used, the existing gravel road will be formalized. The entrance to the development will be shifted 35 metres northwards to directly opposite Barlinka Street, and a portion of the neighbour’s wall will be moved to improved sightlines along Voortrekker Street. …

Low



Heritage resources

The historic farmhouse will not be affected by the proposed development. The development is also expected to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding area.

Low


Low

Alternative S3 – Layout option Three – 32 erven in a ribbon layout plus 8 erven in a node

Potential impacts:













Low


Low




442 m3 of water per year.


High

The Local Authority has appointed an independent company to analyse the potential impact of the proposed development on the existing bulk water supply infrastructure. Erf 660 shares water from a mountain stream with the municipality, in the proportions of a 116/168 portion being the municipality’s and the remaining 52/168 being allocated to Erf 660*. Kwezi-V3 Engineers have calculated that Erf 660’s portion of the mountain stream is sufficient to provide a reliable water supply to offset the water demands of the proposed development. Erf 660 will therefore cede, by means of a title deed registration,



estimated water demand of the proposed development. Dual-flush toilets, water-efficient showers and rainwater tanks will be used to reduce pressure on water supply infrastructure and minimize wastage of water. * please note that the exact portions may change depending on which layout option is preferred. This portion has been calculated to provide the water requirements of 38 residential erven (preferred alternative)

Low



Hydrological – drainage canal A drainage canal runs along the south/ south-eastern side of the property. This could potentially be a hazard to nearby houses during the operational phase of the development. This layout will result in more houses bordering the drainage canal than the preferred alternative (Layout Option 1), and is thus more likely to impact on the canal.

Medium

The Home Owners association will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the operational phase. Any structures put in place to smooth and shape the channel (gabions, etc.) should be checked annually. As recommended in the floodline assessment by Sinske Consult (see Appendix G), the channel must be kept clear of excessive vegetation, which should be cleared on an as-needs basis.

Low


No impacts on the farm dam are expected during the operational phase. However, the dam must be periodically monitored to ensure that it does not become a hazard.

Medium


Low



Waste – Sewage/ Effluent According to the report by Kwezi-V3 Engineers, preliminary investigations have shown that there is existing capacity within the existing sewage lines to accommodate the proposed development during its operational phase. Several existing sewage plants are located in close proximity to the site of the proposed development. The local wastewater treatment works currently have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development.

Low

The Breede Valley Municipality’s Civil Engineering Services state in their letter (dated 17 April 2009) that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development within the Municipal sewage works in De Doorns.

Low

Waste – domestic

It is estimated that the proposed development will generate approximately 42 m

3 of solid waste

per month. This waste will need to be accommodated within the municipal stream.

Low


Low



Low


Low



Land transformation – Visual impacts In terms of the Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists in EIA Processes (DEA&DP Guidelines Series 2005), the only indicator triggered is that of the ‘change in land-use from the prevailing use’. The low to medium density residential development (Category 3 development) falls within an area that the heritage assessments conducted on Erf 660 suggest can be categorized as an ‘Area or route of low scenic, cultural, historical significance/ disturbed’. Therefore a ‘Minimal visual impact’ is expected. The proposed ‘vineyard village’ will slightly increase the visual impact of the development, as it will be located away from the built edge of De Doorns. Street lighting will be installed where necessary within the development.

Low - Medium


Low


Low

No upgrades to intersections are envisaged for the proposed preferred entrance on le Serene Street. A turning circle will be provided at the entrance to the development to accommodate refuse trucks, etc. A section of concrete strip road would need to be upgraded to accommodate construction vehicles and residents during both the construction and operational phases of the development. If the alternative entrance is used, the existing gravel road will be formalized. The entrance to the development will be shifted 35 metres northwards to directly opposite Barlinka Street, and a portion of the neighbour’s wall will be moved to improved sightlines along Voortrekker Street.

Low



Heritage resources

The historic farmhouse will not be affected by the proposed development, which is situated a significant distance away. The development is also expected to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding area.

Low


Low

Alternative activity – No Go alternative

Potential impacts:




Should the proposed development not go ahead, it is likely that the property will remain under cultivation. Associated no-go impacts would include a loss of potential short and long-term employment opportunities. The local municipality would also forego potential income from rates and taxes from the new development.

Medium

The local authority’s LED policy would be tested to find replacement employment opportunities. There would be an increased burden on state social security.

Low

10. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE DECOMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE Briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the decommissioning and closure phase for the various alternatives of the proposed development. This must include an assessment of the significance of all impacts.

Alternative S1 (preferred activity alternative – Layout Option 1)

Potential impacts:




Decommissioning – Not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable Not applicable

Alternative S2 – Layout Option 2

Potential impacts: Significance Proposed mitigation: Significance



rating of impacts(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):

rating of impacts after mitigation(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):



Alternative S3 – Layout Option 3

Potential impacts:






Alternative Activity – No-Go alternative

Potential impacts:






11. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Describe potential impacts that, on their own may not be significant, but will be significant when added to the impact of other activities or existing impacts in the environment and substantiate response (The information in this section must be provided for all the alternatives as well):

One cumulative impact of the proposed development may be the precedent it will set regarding the urban edge of De Doorns. De Doorns only has a suggested urban edge, which runs around the border of Erf 660, excluding the proposed development site. However, this suggested urban edge also excludes, amongst other things, the municipal sewage works. The proposed development would be a logical inclusion in the urban edge. There is a high demand for housing in De Doorns, and therefore the municipality should make demarcating an official urban edge a priority to prevent urban sprawl. This development will also place an increased demand on local service infrastructure. In some cases



(e.g. wastewater treatment), current upgrades to facilities will ensure that they have sufficient capacity to accommodate the development. Further upgrades to increase service capacity may be necessary to accommodate any future developments. Another potential cumulative impact is the loss of agricultural land that will occur as a result of this development. Approximately 4 hectares of currently productive land will be lost. This potential loss of land must be viewed in the context that the development will constitute a natural extension of the town of De Doorns. This holds true for all the layour alternatives being considered, with the exception of Layout 3, which will include the development of the satellite ‘vineyard village’ in the middle of the vineyards. In most respects this development will not contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. Visually, the development is close enough to the town centre (approximately 300 metres from Voortrekker Street) to be a credible part of the town, rather than a residential outpost in farmlands.



12. IMPACT SUMMARY OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Having assessed the significance of impacts of the various alternatives, please provide an overall summary and reasons for selecting the preferred alternative.

In terms of the potential impacts resulting from the planning, design and construction phase, the most significant impacts relate to the drainage canal which runs along the south eastern boundary of the property. There will also be a low visual impact from the clearing of vineyards and the installation of service infrastructure and construction of individual houses, however this will be partially masked by the existing row of trees that will shelter the proposed development. Other less significant impacts relate to noise, dust and traffic impacts, the loss of agricultural lands and possible increases in storm water runoff. These impacts are all rated as being low, even without mitigation measures. Barring the loss of agricultural land to the development, all impacts can be addressed through the implementation of suitable mitigating measures.

In terms of the potential impacts resulting from the operational phase of the development, the most significant impact relates to the supply of water to the development. However, this will be offset by an equivalent amount of water being ceded to the municipality from the Developer’s existing water rights. It is thus expected that this impact will have little or no impact on water provision in the area. Less significant impacts relate to the provision of services such domestic waste removal and wastewater treatment, the visual, traffic and noise impacts of the proposed development, as well as impacts on the heritage value of the property. These impacts were all found to be of low significance. All impacts can be addressed through the implementation of suitable mitigating measures.

The preferred layout is selected above the two layout alternatives because it is the most compact layout plan. This will help reduce the visual impact of the development, and also improve the efficiency of service provision, as the development will have a more nodal layout. It is also situated on the least valuable agricultural land on the property, and would form a logical inclusion into the town urban edge. The preferred activity alternative is selected above the No-Go alternative because the selected land is suitable for development and will not have a significant impact on agricultural production. The proposed development will contribute to the local economy in the short term (construction phase) and will potentially create jobs in the long term (operational phase).

13. RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER

In my view (EAP), the information contained in this application form and the documentation attached hereto is sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for.

YES ��

NO

If “NO”, list the aspects that should be further assessed through additional specialist input/assessment or whether this application must be subjected to a Scoping process before a decision can be made:

Not applicable If “YES”, please list recommended conditions, including mitigation measures, that should in your view be considered for inclusion in an authorisation if the activity is authorised by the competent authority:



In our opinion, the most important mitigation measures during the Construction Phase would be: Storm water runoff generated within the development will be accommodated within the internal storm water networks which will consist of underground pipes sized to accommodate 1:2 year storms. These pipes will discharge into the existing ground canal on the southern side of the site, which may be formalized and shaped to accommodate larger storms. The Developer will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the construction phase. The existing culvert and bridge should be consolidated into a single structure, and the culvert enlarged to accommodate flows of greater magnitude. The channel should be ‘cleaned’ and shaped to accommodate larger flows, and the footpath along the channel on the development side should be raised to ensure sufficient freeboard during a 50 year flood. The level of the proposed access road on both sides of the culvert should be raised to confine the overflow width for larger floods. For further details see the report by Sinske Consult (Appendix G) All due care will be taken to ensure that the dam wall is not damaged during the construction process. All due care will be taken to ensure that the dam wall is not damaged during the construction process. Routine maintenance checks will be done to ensure that the dam remains in good condition. (see Operational Phase below) As per the recommendations made by Aurecon South Africa in the Dam Safety Evaluation (see Appendix G) an enlarged drainage pipe will replace the existing pipe. A sand/finger drainage system will be installed on the portion of the wall above the pumphouse. The vegetation on the portion of the wall above the pumphouse should be cut short to allow for inspection. The water next to the outlet pipe must be drained so that seepage next to the pipe can be assessed. The Developer will display an all-hours telephone number on the site for emergency calls or complaints. The Developer will ensure that noise levels are kept to a minimum by limiting operation of heavy earthmoving equipment and construction activities to normal working hours, and to normal work days (i.e. Monday to Friday, between 08:00 and 17:00) All relevant measures should be taken to minimize the traffic impact of the development, including the formalizing of the access road and shifting of the entrance (for the alternative access point). The Developer will ensure that traffic flow is not impeded by avoiding the transportation of materials during peak traffic hours of 07:00-08:00 and 16:00 and 17:00. If any human remains are uncovered, exposed or disturbed during the construction phase, these should immediately be reported to the South African Heritage Resources Agency, and should not be removed until inspected by an archaeologist. Massing, proportions and scale of buildings as well as use of colour of walls should be sympathetic to the rural character of the local area.



In our opinion, the most important mitigation measures during the Operational Phase would be: Storm water runoff generated within the development will be accommodated within the internal storm water networks which will consist of underground pipes sized to accommodate 1:2 year storms. These pipes will discharge into the existing ground canal on the southern side of the site, which may be formalized and shaped to accommodate larger storms.

Erf 660 will therefore cede, by means of a title deed registration, the right to the first 1.33 ℓ/s of flow of Erf 660’s right to the mountain stream to the municipality. This will provide the municipality with a total of 17 520 m

3per year, which will offset the estimated water demand of the proposed development (17

520 m3per year).

Dual-flush toilets, water-efficient showers and rainwater tanks will be used to reduce pressure on water supply infrastructure and minimize wastage of water. The Home Owners association will ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the canal is not damaged, polluted or blocked during the construction phase. As per the recommendations in the report prepared by Sinske Consult (see Appendix G), structures put in place to smooth and shape the channel (gabions, etc.) should be checked annually. The channel must be kept clear of excessive vegetation, which should be cleared on an as-needs basis. All due care will be taken to ensure that the dam wall is not damaged during the construction process. Routine maintenance checks will be done to ensure that the dam remains in good condition. As specified in the report by Aurecon South Africa, the following things should be monitored. Wave erosion on the slopes of the dam must be monitored and the walls restored when necessary. Seepage on the down-slope must be monitored for any increase, or local seepage such as ‘sandboils’. Any changes must be reported to a dam engineer immediately. The stability of the dam slope must be monitored. Seepage and erosion along the overflow pipe must be monitored, and the pipe must be kept clear. The valves on the outlet pipe must be fully opened and shut at least four times per year, and must be maintained so that they can open and shut when necessary. Trees must not be allowed to grow on the dam wall, and all vegetation must be kept low (1 metre high or less) to allow for inspection. The pipes that are buried in the top of the dam wall must remain in place. Street lighting should face downward to minimize light pollution. A visual corridor will be maintained to the declared heritage resource (the homestead). Trees should be planted where appropriate to further screen the development and along streets and in public open spaces within the development.



APPENDICES The following appendices must be attached where appropriate:

Appendix

Tick (“��”) box if Appendix is attached

Appendix A: Location map �� Appendix B: Site plan(s) �� Appendix C: Owner(s) consent(s) �� Appendix D: Photographs �� Appendix E: Public participation information: including a copy of the register of interested and affected parties, the comments and responses report, proof of notices, advertisements and any other public participation information as required in Section C above.

��

Appendix F: Permit(s) / license(s) from any other organ of state including service letters from the municipality

��

Appendix G: Specialist Report(s) �� Appendix H: Any Other (describe)



DECLARATIONS

The Applicant I…………………………………., in my personal capacity or duly authorized thereto hereby declare that:

• The information contained in this application form is true and correct, and

• I am fully aware of my responsibilities in terms of the National Environmental Management Act of 1989 (“NEMA”) (Act No. 107 of 1998) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (“EIA Regulations”) in terms of NEMA (Government Notice No. R. 385, R. 386, and R. 387 in the Government Gazette of 21 April 2006 refer), and that failure to comply with these requirements may constitute an offence in terms of NEMA and the EIA Regulations.

Note: If acting in a representative capacity, a certified copy of the resolution or power of attorney must be attached.

Signature of the applicant:

Name of company:

Date:

The independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner I ……………………………………, as the appointed independent environmental practitioner hereby declare that:

• The information contained in this application form is true and correct, and

• I am fully aware of my responsibilities in terms of the National Environmental Management Act of 1989 (“NEMA”) (Act No. 107 of 1998) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (“EIA Regulations”) in terms of NEMA (Government Notice No. R. 385, R. 386, and R. 387 in the Government Gazette of 21 April 2006 refer), and that failure to comply with these requirements may constitute an offence in terms of NEMA and the EIA Regulations.

Note: The terms of reference must be attached.

Signature of the environmental practitioner:

Name of company:

Date:

WESTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS … Estate PDF report/Erf 660 De Doorns... · WESTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Basic Assessment

Documents