11/21/2013 WEST MONROE PARTNERS, INC. Technology Acquisition Project Alexandre Peck, Adam Nilsson & Nico Donato WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
11/21/2013
WEST MONROE PARTNERS, INC. Technology Acquisition Project
Alexandre Peck, Adam Nilsson & Nico
Donato WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
1 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Company Profile...........................................................................................................................3
Project Charter………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4
Executive Summary................................................................................................................4
Business Need.........................................................................................................................4
Project Objective....................................................................................................................4
Impact Assessment.................................................................................................................5
Measurement of Success........................................................................................................5
Scope......................................................................................................................................5
Risks........................................................................................................................................5
Time Constraints.....................................................................................................................6
Stakeholder and Sponsor Approval.............................................................................................7
Request for Proposal...................................................................................................................8
General Information..................................................................................................................10
Purpose of the RFP...............................................................................................................10
RFP Communications............................................................................................................10
Timeline................................................................................................................................10
RFP Preparation....................................................................................................................10
Vendor Responses………........................................................................................................10
Effective Dates of Pricing......................................................................................................11
Vendor Site Visits..................................................................................................................11
Functional requirements......................................................................................................11
Technical requirements........................................................................................................11
Right to Reject……………………………………………………………………………………………………………......11
2 | P a g e
Vendor Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12
RFP Response Format...........................................................................................................12
Exceptions to the RFP...........................................................................................................13
Confidentiality......................................................................................................................13
Product Information..................................................................................................................13
Functionality Requirements………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
Negotiation Strategy……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..16
Summary...............................................................................................................................16
Initial Terms..........................................................................................................................16
Agendas................................................................................................................................16
Leverage...............................................................................................................................16
Objectives.............................................................................................................................17
Strategy.................................................................................................................................17
Potential Tactics....................................................................................................................17
Negotiation Team and Rules………………………………………………………………………………………....…17
Deal Sheet..................................................................................................................................18
Operations/Implementations Write-Up……………………………………………………………………………….19
Project Closure…………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..20
Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….22
Project Schedule...................................................................................................................23
Decision Scoring Matrix........................................................................................................26
Performance Evaluation Forms…………………………………………………………………………………….....28
3 | P a g e
Company Profile
Vertafore was founded in 1969. Connection is what separates Vertafore from its competitors.
Their products and services are designed to help you connect more closely with customers,
prospects, and business partners not just within a single product category, but across the entire
insurance chain. To make that happen, they stay connected to you. Every touch point is an
opportunity to listen, learn and increase the tangible value of their products and services.
Vertafore delivers the most advanced tools and technologies available today. But what they
really deliver is the competitive edge agencies, carriers, brokers and so many other insurance
professionals need to grow their successful businesses.
For over 40 years, Vertafore has focused on helping insurance agencies, carriers and MGAs
harness the power of software solutions to stay ahead of the competition and stay profitable.
With more than 20,000 agencies, carrier and MGA customers, they are the leading provider of
connected technology and information solutions to the insurance industry.
4 | P a g e
Project Charter
Executive Summary
West Monroe Partners currently sells individual insurance policies to people who own their
own business (LLC). There is an opportunity to acquire technology that will assist in creating
optimal client management solutions using an Agency Management System (AMS) software.
The software needs to accommodate about 100+ employees, and remain within their budget of
$250,000. West Monroe Partners has about 10,000 clients and process around 11,000 policies
per year. They are a high volume, low dollar operation with the average policy costing $250.
To be considered successful, all the employees will have access to all sales data since it will be
located in one, easily accessible, program. Therefore, there should be an increase in customer
satisfaction and a decrease in administrative costs.
The client is West Monroe Partners, which acts as our stakeholder and sponsor. Also involved in
guiding our Technology Acquisition Project is Jill Lambert, a current employee for West Monroe
Partners. Under the supervision of Ms. Lambert, our team consists of Alexandre Peck, Adam
Nilsson, and Nico Donato. We are working towards determining the best technology solution
for our client.
Business Needs
• Need the ability to offer clients a software that increases both internal productivity and
the optimal customer experience. This requires an Agency Management System (AMS).
• Need the ability to create optimum client management with a cloud based system.
• Need to implement a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) strategy to aid
productivity and call resolution rates.
Project Objectives
Apply technology to enable development of optimal document management and customer
relationships.
The key components of the Sales System should provide:
• Cloud Computing
• Partner Management
• Online Insurance Quoting
5 | P a g e
• Client Management
Impact Assessment
By implementing this new technology West Monroe Partners will benefit greatly. They will be
presented with a technology upgrade that will be able to easily track their current customers
and easily access and monitor their client information. The reason they are doing this is
because their old system can’t keep up and they feel that an upgrade is necessary to keep up
with the competitors. There will be a period of training and implementing the new technology
but it will all benefit them in the end.
Measures of Success
This project will be considered successful if the existing number of clients increases by more
than 10 percent. West Monroe Partners is also counting on an increase in customer
satisfaction. Customers will receive an account on the new system and it will be easier for them
to track and monitor their insurance through their computer. The new system will also benefit
the employees of West Monroe Partners and will take away time from troubleshooting. Their
employees will as a result be able to focus on tasks that are more important. The real measure
of success will be to see how the new customers react to this new system and see a benefit in
partnering with West Monroe Partners.
Scope
This project addresses client management improvements for individual insurance policies that
are sold through an AMS software. It also addresses a new need for technology to become
better organized and to share insurance quotes quickly and easily. The project will be
completed once a new technology is in place and all past date has been transferred to the new
technology. The project will take no longer than 4 months and remain in the budget of 250
thousand dollars.
Risks
Unfortunately there will be some high stake risks in the project. There is a possibility that the
company will lose date during the changeover of software. When the company switches over to
the new system there is no guarantee that all of the date will save. Another risk could be that
we go over budget during the project. Even though our budget is 250 thousand, which is a good
6 | P a g e
amount, however there is a chance we could go over. Having to train the staff on how to use
the new technology may risk exceeding the budget. That also leads to our next problem of the
employees having trouble learning the new technology. With technology being more and more
difficult to understand, people of an older age may have a harder time adjusting. Employees
must be able to acquire new skills and assume new responsibilities. The last risk that we can
think of is schedule changes and unclear due dates have put the team at risk of falling behind in
the research process.
• Client data inaccuracy will have a negative impact on projecting future data volumes.
• Employee satisfaction could suffer based on new technology familiarity.
Time Constraints
This project must be completed prior to the next holiday season to minimize the number of
potential clients lost due to not having the appropriate technology used to serve multiple
clients. The customer has given us four months, beginning September 13, 2013, to find a new
technology and present them with our recommendation. Moreover, due to our own semester
constraints we need to complete our project by December 10th, 2013.
7 | P a g e
Stakeholder and Sponsor Approval
The company that will be receiving the technology recommendation also serves as the major
stakeholder of the project as well as the project sponsor. The company’s employee and its
profitability will be the two aspects that will be the most affected by the success of the new
technology. Jill Lambert, a current employee for West Monroe Partners, is also our stakeholder.
Ms. Lambert is working closely with us to help determine which technology will benefit the
company and the clients the most. Under the guidance of Ms. Lambert, our team consisting of
Alexandre Peck, Adam Nilsson, and Nico Donato, will also submit a decision on which
technology they should use.
8 | P a g e
Request for Proposal (RFP)
October 17, 2013
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Dear Prospective Vendors:
West Monroe Partners, Inc., a leading insurance provider for small business owners, is in the
process of selecting a strategic vendor to partner with WMP in providing the optimal customer
experience through the application of an insurance agency management system within one of
our offices. We feel the opportunity exists to leverage the depth and breadth of delivery
solutions available through strategic vendors, allowing us to focus on our core competencies
and meet our corporate mission. A significant component of the overall solution is the need for
managing our resources effectively.
WMP offers its customers insurance policies via traditional delivery options: in-office, phone,
letters and faxes, and e-mail. WMP needs to spend less time on tedious, time-consuming tasks,
to have more time to spend enhancing customer service and building our business.
WMP uses the services of Liberty Mutual as its insurance provider. We currently only have the
ability to store our clients information manually, through our employee computers and/or
physical paper formats. The strategic plan calls for an upgrade in storing our clients’
information. Our company currently handles (100%) of client database offline.
WMP is currently handling approximately 10,000 clients and process around 11,000 policies per
year. This is a high volume, low dollar operation – our average policy is $250.
We expect that volume to increase by (35%) in the next 12 months.
The insurance agency management system is anticipated to provide WMP with the following:
Improved productivity and efficiency
Improved document management
Improved customer relationship management
Quoting by offering one-click access to carrier systems
Fully integrated with Microsoft Outlook
Vendor assisted technology solutions
Strategic partnership with a leading edge insurance agency management vendor
9 | P a g e
This RFP is meant to define and document our functional needs and also establish a consistent
basis on which insurance agency management vendor proposals can be judged. WMP and/or its
designees will evaluate all proposals.
This RFP and all materials submitted by WMP are to be treated as strictly confidential. As a
prospective insurance agency management vendor, you must not forward any such materials or
otherwise disclose their content to any third party for evaluation or for any other purpose.
Please carefully review the guidelines for Proposals established in the RFP. Your proposal
should describe in detail your application’s functionality, technological merit, competitive
costing, ease of use, technical assistance plans as well as specify all associated costs.
Perspective insurance agency management vendors should develop and present their costs
with the intention that it represents the “last, final, and best” price. Your ability to meet clearly
and precisely the needs outlined in the RFP will directly impact our evaluation process. WMP
reserves the right to modify the general scope of the RFP prior to proposal submission.
Vendors who apply creativity and flexibility, along with their resident in-house knowledge and
expertise, will enhance the consideration their proposal receives. Multiple solution scenarios or
variations on a theme may be offered. The requirements outlines in Sections I and II must be
met.
We appreciate your consideration and assistance in this matter and look forward to receiving
your proposal.
Sincerely,
Alexandre Peck
Consultant
West Monroe Partners, Inc.
10 | P a g e
General Information
Purpose of RFP
The purpose of the Request for Proposal (RFP) is to establish a more functional, operational and
technical requirements for the procurement of a workforce management system that best
meets West Monroe Partners.
RFP Communications
Please direct all communications/correspondence regarding this RPF to:
Jill Lambert
West Monroe Partners LLC
222 W Adams St, Chicago, IL 60606
[email protected] | (773) 456-6944
Timeline
Vendor research, review October, 2013
RFP Sample submission October, 2013
Proposal Due Date November, 2013
Vendor Selection November, 2013
RFP Preparation
The prospective vendors will assume all costs associated in the preparation and presentation of
an RFP. In the event that modifications or additions to the RFP become necessary, prospective
vendors will be notified in writing. All supporting materials submitted with the proposal will
become property of WMP unless otherwise requested at the time of submittal.
Vendor Responses
All prospective vendors are required to submit six copies of their proposals to Jill Lambert no
later than November 15, 2012. All materials and documentation must be included with the
proposal or the vendor may be eliminated from final evaluation.
11 | P a g e
Effective Dates of Pricing
Prospective vendors should state in writing that all furnished information, including pricing, will
remain valid and applicable for a minimum of one hundred (100) days form the date their
proposal is received by WMP Corporation.
Vendor Site Visits
WMP Corporation reserves the right to inspect any and all vendor facilities, which will be used
to support the proposed workforce management solution. This includes the facilities of any
contractor or outside support organization that will be used.
Functional requirements
The product needs to be able to follow all of our technical requirements and be an upgrade to
the current technology West Monroe Partner is working with. The vendor we choose also needs
to fit the budget which we will get to later.
Technical requirements
The new technology acquisition needs to be have:
Needs to be able to track customers in a better way
Be able to have new customers show their interest in the web site and then have West
Monroe contact them
Simplify billing and quoting
Needs to be able to access on a tablet and phone
Right to Reject
WMP reserves the right to accept or reject any and/or all submitted proposals and request
additional information from all prospective vendors. WMP Specifically reserves the right to
negotiate a contract with the selected vendor. The vendor’s response to this RFP will be
included in whole or by reference in the final contract. At the discretion of WMP, a third party
financial institution or consulting team could be included in contract negotiations. Any contract
that is eventually awarded will be made to the organization who, based on the evaluation of all
responses, applying all criteria and oral interviews, is determined to be the best qualified to
provide the requested solution and support.
12 | P a g e
Vendor Guidelines
RFP Response Format
Prospective vendors should make every attempt to use terminology in their proposal that is
consistent with that of WMP and this RFP. Comparable terminology may be substituted, where
appropriate, if the prospective vendor provides clear and concise definitions. Prospective
vendor proposals should address the requirements outlined in this RFP as directly and concisely
as possible. Extraneous information with no apparent connection to WMP and RFP could
detract from the proposal scoring.
The information furnished should be in specific response to this RFP. Specific answers are
required to specific questions were asked. Supplemental information should be prepared on
standard size paper.
Vendor responses to this RFP will become a part of the final contract between WMP and the
vendor.
Prospective vendors are requested to provide their proposal in the following format:
Letter of Transmittal
The letter of transmittal should be no longer than two pages and should include the
following:
o A brief statement of the vendors understanding of the mission-critical nature of
the workforce management technology to WMP’s business and market position.
o A brief statement of the services to be provided.
o A statement of commitment to provide the services requested within the time
and manner specified.
o The names of personnel authorized to represent the vendor, including titles,
addresses, phone and FAX numbers. WMP would prefer to deal with a single
representative.
o A summary of the prospective vendors’ qualifications to perform this type of
engagement.
Table of Contents
The table of contents should include a clear and complete identification of the materials
submitted by section and page number.
Product Overview
Prospective vendors should follow the instructions in the Product Overview section of
this RFP.
Functional Requirements
13 | P a g e
Prospective vendors should follow the instructions in the Functional Product
Information section of this RFP.
Technical Requirements
Prospective vendors should respond to all technical information requests in the
Technical Product Information section of this RFP
Strategic Partnership Potential
Prospective vendors should provide the information requested in the strategic
Partnership Potential section of this RFP.
Cost Requirements
Prospective vendors should provide the information requested in the Cost summary
section of this RFP.
Appendix
Prospective vendors may provide any other information that the vendor considers
appropriate for this proposal in an appendix.
Expectations of the RFP
Prospective vendors may find instances where their operations do not function in a manner
consistent with the specifications in the RFP. In such cases, it is permissible to take exception to
portions of the RFP. The expectations should be clearly identified. If necessary, attach an
additional page describing the scope of the exceptions, any additional costs, and a summary of
any advantages these exceptions represent to WMP.
Confidentiality
This RFP and all materials submitted by WMP must be considered confidential. WMP requests
that this RFP not be copied and not be forwarded to any third party for evaluation or for any
other purpose without WMP’s express written consent. All prospective vendor personnel
should note that they are under a signed, mutual confidentiality agreement.
Product Information
Prospective vendors should include an overview of what is on their cloud service. Define each
product that is offered in the cloud service and provide a brief description of each product for
the solution. Vendors may include screen examples and/or diagrams in this section.
14 | P a g e
Functionality Requirements
Agency Management System
# Requirement Rating Response
Functionality
1. Personalization
2. Integrated with West
Monroe
3. Tracking of new customers
4. Holding more than 10,000
clients
5. Access Account at any time
# Requirement Rating Response
Technology
1. Simplifies billing and quoting
2. Tablet/Mobile Version
3. Provides client database
4. Being able to access from
home
5. Not having to be tech-savvy
# Requirement Rating Response
Strategic Partnership Potential
1. Supplier Profile
2. Business development and
growth
3. Shared
milestones/accomplishments
4. Support
5. Training
# Requirement Rating Response
Costs
1. Initial Costs
15 | P a g e
2. Ongoing Costs
# Requirement Rating Response
Support
1. Warranty policy
2. Company policy regarding
system updates
3. Frequency of maintenance
checks
4. Emergency recovery plan
16 | P a g e
Negotiation Strategy
Summary
The project team has decided to select Vertafore AMS 360 as the vendor of choice. Gen4
Systems was a close second, while we feel confident that both systems would fill the need for
this project. For this reason, the negotiation team has full authority to negotiate the best
financial package with either of the two vendors.
Initial Terms
Initial cost Vertafore Gen4
Software $100K $150K
Hardware $15K $15K
Consulting $50K $50K
Total: $165K $215K
Agendas
West Monroe Partners Agenda:
Negotiate the best financial package
Negotiate the most effective future support agreement
Vendor Agenda:
Maximize Revenue
Name recognition
Leverage
West Monroe Partners Leverage:
Name recognition
Ability to walk away from the table
Vendor Leverage:
Time
17 | P a g e
Objectives
Negotiate the best financial package with either of the two remaining vendors.
Strategy
Leverage the fact that both vendors are capable of meeting our project objectives and that the
financial package will be the determining factor in who gets the deal.
Potential Tactics
Make it known to both vendors that a decision is made and this is their last chance
to improve the deals in order to get the deal.
Create a time based bidding war
Negotiation Team and Roles
Project Manager: Act as the good cop and facilitate continued communications.
Purchasing Lead: Strive for the most aggressive deal. Act as the bad cop.
Business Lead: Communicate the potential future business to the vendor.
Legal: Negotiate with vendor legal staff and advise negotiation team.
18 | P a g e
Deal Sheet
Deal
Sheet
# Term Initial Minimum Goal
1 Software 85,000 100,000 95,000
2 Implementation 10,000 15,000 12,000
3 Consulting 45,000 50,000 50,000
4
Annual Support
Costs 10,000 15,000 12,000
5
Implementation
Date January 1 January 1 January 1
19 | P a g e
Operations/Implementations Write-Up
We are going to have a support team who will help the customers with trouble shooting. A 24/7
service that will help you as a customer and making this service a pleasant one to use. There
will be three different levels of customer service, first level will be support people who answer
the phone to resolve common questions. Second level will be the senior support people who
are more knowledgeable with the system. The third level will be the vendor support
organization, they will track down the issue and respond to the user.
The response time should be somewhere between a minute or two. If something cannot be
solved within the first level it will then get a tracking number and upper level support will take
care of the issue. The issues should be documented so future support employees know what to
do in certain situations and it will educate them as they are working. Taking the time to do this
will minimize confusion and improve consistency and dealing with the vendor effectively.
For common Q&A you would be directed to first level support and we would also provide a
Q&A on our help page online. If you have trouble getting a quote or other business impact
questions you will be directed to the second level support. The third level support will help
anyone with assistance towards system crashing and high tech problems.
20 | P a g e
Project Closure
Project Documentation
Our project was documented into a binder. This is the primary source of documentation of our project
with West Monroe Partners. This binder will have many benefits, especially for the company. If they
ever need another technology acquisition they can look back at how they implemented this technology
and get the information they need from it.
Supports the Decision
The decision we made is all documented in the binder. The people who look in our binder will see the
documentation and the supporting facts to why we chose the vendor we did. There will be no question
that we chose the right one. For next time, people can look back and see what facts we had and
compare it to what they currently have to see if that is enough to make a decision on a new technology
acquisition.
Provides a great source of education
As mentioned, our documentation is a great reference for future technology acquisition project
managers. They will understand what worked and what didn’t by looking at our project. It will also help
managers organize their project because they have the project schedule and the other parts of the
process documented.
Accountability
The documentation we provided shows the business need of West Monroe and what they needed from
a vendor. It also clearly states the expectations and goals that they had from the project. We also had
regular communication with our project sponsor that helped and agreed on what we came up with in
the project.
Insurance
Having this written document is very important for the legal terms. It will be a backup for other projects
that West Monroe does and prevent a litigation from taking place.
21 | P a g e
Measures success
A look back at what has been accomplished in the project is important. In the project, we did set goals
and measurements to see how successful our project was. Because of this, we can now take a look back
and measure our success and see what worked and what didn’t.
Celebrate success
It is important as a manger to look back and see what was accomplished in this project and what we will
take away from it. The worked we did, and the experience we gained along the way is something that
you are going to bring with you for the rest of your life and it is important that you take a look back to
see what knowledge you gained from the project.
Resource evaluations
We unfortunately had a project member dropping the class, which made us step it up and do more work
together. Since we did that we don’t feel the need for the individual evaluations because we feel that
the work was distributed equally between the three of us. At the same time, it gave the team member
to learn more about the technology acquisition process.
22 | P a g e
Appendix
Project Schedule
23 | P a g e
24 | P a g e
25 | P a g e
Decision Scoring Matrix
Functionality Requirements
Agency Management System
# Requirement Rating Response AMS GEN4
Functionality
1. Personalization 8 8
2. Integrated with West
Monroe
8 8
3. Tracking of new customers 9 8
4. Holding more than 10,000
clients
8 9
5. Access Account at any time 10 10
# Requirement Rating Response
Technology
1. Simplifies billing and quoting 10 10
2. Tablet/Mobile Version 9 8
3. Provides client database 9 9
4. Being able to access from
home
9 9
5. Not having to be tech-savvy 9 8
# Requirement Rating Response
Strategic Partnership Potential
1. Supplier Profile 8 7
2. Business development and
growth
9 9
3. Shared
milestones/accomplishments
8 8
4. Support 10 9
5. Training 9 6
26 | P a g e
# Requirement Rating Response
Costs
1. Initial Costs 10 8
2. Ongoing Costs 10 8
# Requirement Rating Response
Support
1. Warranty Policy 9 9
2. Company policy regarding
system updates
9 9
3. Frequency of maintenance
checks
9 8
4. Emergency recovery plan 10 9
27 | P a g e
Performance Evaluation Form
Individual Performance Evaluation
Evaluate each of your team members, including yourself, in terms of performance using the criteria below. Use the
following scale: 0 = Unsatisfactory, 1 = Satisfactory, 2 = Excellent. Include comments and justifications, especially for
Unsatisfactory or Excellent ratings. Use the back of the sheet if necessary. Total the scores for each member. List in detail
the roles and responsibilities of each team member in the table at the bottom.
Name of Team Member
Criteria Self______
1. Attending meetings
Comments/Justification:
2. Contribution to idea generation
Comments/Justification:
3. Contribution to decision making
Comments/Justification:
4. Communication skills
Comments/Justification:
5. Assuming fair share of work
Comments/Justification:
6. Completion of work assumed
Comments/Justification:
7. Team spirit and respect for others
Comments/Justification:
8. Negotiation and conflict resolution
skills
Comments/Justification:
9. Time management
Comments/Justification:
10. Dependability and preparedness
Comments/Justification:
Totals =
28 | P a g e
Name Roles and Responsibilities of Team Member
Print name of evaluator ___________________ Signature ____________________ Date________
29 | P a g e
Individual Performance Evaluation
Evaluate each of your team members, including yourself, in terms of performance using the criteria below. Use the
following scale: 0 = Unsatisfactory, 1 = Satisfactory, 2 = Excellent. Include comments and justifications, especially for
Unsatisfactory or Excellent ratings. Use the back of the sheet if necessary. Total the scores for each member. List in detail
the roles and responsibilities of each team member in the table at the bottom.
Name of Team Member
Criteria Self______
1. Attending meetings
Comments/Justification:
2. Contribution to idea generation
Comments/Justification:
3. Contribution to decision making
Comments/Justification:
4. Communication skills
Comments/Justification:
5. Assuming fair share of work
Comments/Justification:
6. Completion of work assumed
Comments/Justification:
7. Team spirit and respect for others
Comments/Justification:
8. Negotiation and conflict resolution
skills
Comments/Justification:
9. Time management
Comments/Justification:
10. Dependability and preparedness
Comments/Justification:
Totals =
Name Roles and Responsibilities of Team Member
30 | P a g e
Print name of evaluator ___________________ Signature ____________________ Date________
31 | P a g e
Individual Performance Evaluation
Evaluate each of your team members, including yourself, in terms of performance using the criteria below. Use the
following scale: 0 = Unsatisfactory, 1 = Satisfactory, 2 = Excellent. Include comments and justifications, especially for
Unsatisfactory or Excellent ratings. Use the back of the sheet if necessary. Total the scores for each member. List in detail
the roles and responsibilities of each team member in the table at the bottom.
Name of Team Member
Criteria Self______
1. Attending meetings
Comments/Justification:
2. Contribution to idea generation
Comments/Justification:
3. Contribution to decision making
Comments/Justification:
4. Communication skills
Comments/Justification:
5. Assuming fair share of work
Comments/Justification:
6. Completion of work assumed
Comments/Justification:
7. Team spirit and respect for others
Comments/Justification:
8. Negotiation and conflict resolution
skills
Comments/Justification:
9. Time management
Comments/Justification:
10. Dependability and preparedness
Comments/Justification:
Totals =
Name Roles and Responsibilities of Team Member
32 | P a g e
Print name of evaluator ___________________ Signature ____________________ Date________