Top Banner
Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1 ,S 1 K 2 ,S 2
26

Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

Hilary Stokes
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities

by

Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch

Clemson University

K1,S1

K2,S2

Page 2: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Faults

Steeply Dipping Beds

Page 3: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Igneous Rocks

Facies Change

Reef

Marine Clay

BatholithBatholith Country Country rockrock

Dike

Channel sand

Floodplain deposits

Page 4: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Conceptual Models

Local Neighboring

T1 S1 T2 S2=S1

L L

2-Domain Model 3-Domain Model

Region 1 Region 3Strip

T1 S1T3 = T1

S3 = S1

L Lw

T2

S2=S1

Page 5: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Methods• 2-Domain Model

– Transient analytical solution using Method of Images (Fenske, 1984)

• 3-Domain Model– Transient numerical model using MODFLOW– Tr and w of the strip were varied. – Grid optimized for small mass balance errors

),,(

11

,,,,1

11Lyxf

dt

Er

Sr

Ttyxd

tE

ds

Page 6: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

2-Domain Model T Contrast

- 2 0 2 40

2

4T i m e A T i m e B T i m e C

Tr=10

Tr = 1

Tr=0.1

Page 7: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

3-Domain Model T ContrastT im e B T im e C T im e D

- 4 - 2 0 2

Tr = 10

Tr = 1

Tr = 0.1

Page 8: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

2-Domain T Contrast – 0.125L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0.1 10 1000 100000td

s d

homogeneous No Flow T1/T2=10

T1/T2=100 T1/T2=5 T1/T2=0.1

T1/T2=0.01 T1/T2=0.5 CH

0

1

2

0.1 10 1000 100000td

ds d

/dln

(t d)

Page 9: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

2-Domain T Contrast – 0.5L

Page 10: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

3-Domain T Contrast - 0.125L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0.1 10 1000 100000td

sd

homogeneous No Flow T1/T2=10T1/T2=100 T1/T2=5 T1/T2=0.1T1/T2=0.01 T1/T2=0.5 CH

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0.1 10 1000 100000td

m =

ds d

/dln

(td)

Page 11: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

3-Domain T Contrast - 0.5L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0.1 10 1000td

sd

homogeneous No Flow T1/T2=10T1/T2=100 T1/T2=5 T1/T2=0.1T1/T2=0.01 T1/T2=0.5 CH

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0.1 10 1000td

m =

ds

d/d

ln(t

d)

Page 12: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Strip Transmissivness & Conductance

• Hydraulic properties of the strip depend on strip conductivity and width

• Strip is a higher K than matrix

• Strip is a lower K than matrix

LK

wKT

a

ssd

a

sd K

L

w

KC

wKT ss

w

KC s

Page 13: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Strip Transmissivness & Conductance

010 52.1 98831min

min1

.CB.A

B

Cm

CmA

sdT

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

1 1.5 2

mmaxC

d

18.1 094.0

1maxmax2

BA

B

mm

Ad

C

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

0 0.5 1mmin

Tsd

Page 14: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Graphical EvaluationBoundary Type and Location

WellHigh T to Low TLow T to High T

0

5

10

15

20

0.1 10 1000 100000

td

s d

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

0.1 10 1000 100000

td

s d

Page 15: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Graphical EvaluationEstimate Aquifer Properties

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

tdL

s d

to=0.029 S=0.017s=2.3 T=1

to=0.42 S=0.35s=4.1 T = 0.55

Page 16: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Graphical EvaluationEstimate Aquifer Properties

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

tdL

s d

to = 2.7 S=0.136s = 4.1 T=0.55

Page 17: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

TE=1SE=0.0179

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.25

TE=1SE=0.0179

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.136

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.06

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.27

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.021

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.068

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.029

TTLL=0.55=0.55SL=0.021

L

L L

Page 18: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Graphical EvaluationEstimate Aquifer Properties

to=0.09 S = 0.054s = 2.3 T = 1

to=0.028 S = 0.017s = 2.3 T = 1

Page 19: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Determine Properties of Strip

• SSL analysis on the first line will give T and S of the area near the well.

• Take the derivative of time and determine the maximum or minimum slope.

• Using equations from curve fitting determine Tsd or Cd of the layer.

• Solve for Ts or C

Page 20: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Field Case

K.G

. Fau

lt

Page 21: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Field Case - Site Map

BW-109

BW2

L

Page 22: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Drawdown from Piezometers

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0.0001 0.01 1

t/r2

s

BW-109 BW-2

0

0.5

1

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1t (min)

m =

ds

/dln

(t)

Page 23: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Drawdown from Pumping Well

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

10 1000 100000

t/r2

s

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

10 100 1000 10000

time (min)

m =

ds/

dln

(t)

Page 24: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

• Using Semi-Log Straight-Line Analysis :

• Minimum slope using the derivative curve is 0.5

• Tsd=33.99=Ksw/KaL

Determining Hydraulic Properties

0

2

4

6

8

10

1 10 100 1000 10000

t (min)

s

00.5

11.5

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

t/r2

ds

/dln

(t)

L = 280 ft Distance to fault

b = 21.5 ft screened thickness

T = 0.053 ft2/minS = 2x10-4 ???

Ts = 23.79 ft2/minTs/Ta = 450

Page 25: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Conclusions 2-Domain Model

Semi-Log Straight-line Method• Piezometers r<0.3L gives T, S of local region.• Piezometers r>0.3L gives average T of both

regions.• Piezometers r>0.3L unable to predict S• Piezometers in neighboring region also give

average T of both regions.• Analyzing piezometers individually poor approach

to characterizing heterogeneities.

Page 26: Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Conclusions 3-Domain Model• Drawdown for low conductivity vertical layer

controlled by conductance.

C=Ks/w • Drawdown for high conductivity vertical layer

controlled by strip transmissivness.

Ts=Ks*w• Feasible to determine properties of a vertical layer

from drawdown curves.• Drawdown curves non-unique. Require

geological assessment.