Welcome! | Korea Science

81
()
() ()
( )
.
.
.
,
, , ,
. ,
.
I.
, ,
.
,
.
( )
.
,
.
.
74
() .
* (2014 2 12), (2014 2 13), (2014 2 14)
* ZDM : D44, U34
: [email protected]
82
,
. ( )
.
.

.
II.
1.
.
“ ”
,
“underachiever”
“slow learner” .
(1984) . , “
,
” , ,
( )
.
2. ( )

, , ( , 2011;
, 1989).
, . ,
,
.
, .

.
, . ,
,
.
.
83








( , )
< -1>

, , ,
.
3.
.
, (2002)
,
, .
,
.
, (2001)
. ,
,
.
, (2006)
84

.
.
, (2008)

. ,
, ,
, .
, (2011)

, .
, 5
.

.
.
1.
1 89, .

( ) . 3 3 (A,
B, C).
A, B, C C 1 B 89
( ) 89 30(1), 59(2)
.
6, 7, 8 C( 2 ), 1, 2 B, C 3, 4, 5 C
.
.
1, 2 3, 4, 5 6, 7, 8
A B, C
1 58.7 27.5 68.8 40.0 24.4 67.1 39.5 24.6
< -1>
85
24.427.5
, (A, B) 58.768.8
.
2.
30
.
1 26
, 1 31%, 2
52% , 34 17% . 26 5
.
2 3
. 30 .
,
.
.
.
/ .

1 5 (17%) 18 (62%) 4 (13%) 2 (6%)
2 2 (6%) 8 (27%) 14 (48%) 5 (17%)
< -2>
, 30 23 .
, ‘ ’, ‘
’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘1
’ . 1
()
.
86

3 2 (7%) 4 (13%) 12 (41%) 5 (17%) 6 (22%)

(4)
(8)
(6)
1 (1)
< -3>
, 80%
,
.

.
, 30 26
. .

.

5 26 (90%) 3 (10%)


18 (40%) 16 (36%) 6 (13%) 5 (11%)
< -4>
, 86% 25
‘ .’
93% . ‘ .’, ‘ .’, ‘
.’
.
,
.
87

6 25 (86%) 4 (14%)
6-1
2 (7%) 17 (59%) 6 (34%)



< -5>
, ‘
.’, ‘ .’, ‘ .’ ,
.

.
, , , , ,
, ( ).
‘’ ‘’ 24% 28% , ‘ ’ ‘ ’
18%, ‘’ 2% , ‘’, ‘ ’ 41%, 28%
‘ ’, ‘’, ‘’ 14%, 13%, 12% . ,
.
/
.

, ,

.
1.

.
2007 1
.
88
2011 3 2011 7 ‘
’ ‘ ’.
.
, .
2.
,
.
.

Rosenshine Stevens(1986) .
, ,

.
- ()
*
-
* (* )
-EBS ( )
*

-
3.
. ( )
.
, , ,
,
.
.

.


.
[ ] [ ]
90

A4
. (2008), (2008), (2008)
,
.
.
.

.

.
.
91
.
.

.
,

. .
92
.
, ,

.
1.

3 4
2 .
30 .
, 90% 27
.





1 8 (27%) 19 (63%) 3 (10%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
< -1>
, 94% 28
.

,
.





2 11 (37%) 17 (57%) 2 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
< -2>
, 80% 24
. 1 3 1
,
.
93
<-3>

3 4 (13%) 20 (67%) 3 (10%) 1 (3%) 2 (7%)
, 60% 18
, 37% (11) .
.
,
, 80% 24
.

.
, 13% 4, 37% 11,
50% 15 , 5
.
.
.
2.
.
1 , 2011 5 6
2 .
24.6 27.5, 24.4
.

( ) , 1 2
23 .
1416
.
94
1 ,2 3, 4, 5 6, 7, 8
A B, C
1 58.7 27.5 68.8 40.0 24.4 67.1 39.5 24.6
2 71.9 31.5 80.7 51.6 33.0 78.1 52.3 47.2
+13.1 +3.9 +11.9 +11.5 +8.6 +11.1 +12.7 +22.6
< -4>
[1 (2011. 2. 18) : 43.8, 2 (2011. 5. 6) : 57.0]
.
“
.”

. ,
.

.

.
, ,
,
.

.
.
1 .
. 2, 3
.
,
.
95

(2006). . , 9(1), 19-40.
(2002). .
E <>, 14, 327-348.
(2008). . ().
(1984). . , RR 84-12.
(2011). 5 .
, 14(4), 459-476.
(1999). , .
(2008). . ().
(2008). . ().
(2008). . ().
(2008). . ().
(2001). - . A <
>, 40(1), 27-51.
(2011). , .
(2008). , .
Rosenshine, V. B. & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching Functions. In M.C. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of Research on
Teaching(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
96
Efficient Teaching Method for the Underachieving Students through Level Differentiated Classes
Joonkook shin Department of Mathematics Education, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 305-764, Korea
E-mail : [email protected]
Sang-In Yun Chungnam girl’s high school, Daejeon, 301-807, Korea
E-mail : [email protected]
Yang-Hee Kim
*
Now, most of programs developed were presented as form of item pool by dividing problems by section and level for the level differentiated course, so the utilization is decreasing at the field caused by unconsidered school underachievement elements by achievement.
Especially, the study on teaching materials and effective measures map for mid-low level students with low utilization is more urgent.
Therefore, in this study we will promote teaching method for improving learning achievement at high school. The development teaching materials(the performance evaluation and diagnostic assessment, reconstruction of textbooks) will be applied to classes for the underachieving students directly, and the achievement in the experimental class was significantly improved compared to the comparative class and the meaningful conclusions could be drawn as results of conducting same assessment based on the experimental class and the comparative class.
* ZDM Classification : D44, U34
Corresponding author