Welcome

North CarolinaStudent Growth

PortfolioSpring 2013 Pilot

Arts Education, Healthful Living, World Languages

February 25, 2013

Welcome

Dr. Maria Pitre-MartinDirectorK-12 Curriculum & Instruction North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Overview of Standard 6

Tara C. Patterson, MSAProfessional Development Lead ConsultantSoutheast RegionEducator Recruitment and DevelopmentNorth Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Agenda For Institute

Educator Effectiveness

www.ncpublicschools.org/educatoreffect/

Standards 6 & 8 – The BasicsRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs

▲

Teachers

1 65432Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

KnowContent

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute to Academic

Success

Principals (and other Administrators)

8Strategic Leadership1 65432 7Instructional

LeadershipCultural

Leadership

Human Resource

Leadership

ManagerialLeadership

External Development

Leadership

Micro-political

Leadership

Academic Achievement

Leadership

Strategic Leadership

Teacher Ratings CategoriesRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs

▲Teachers

1 65432Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

KnowContent

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute to Academic

Success

5 Rating CategoriesNot Demonstrated

Developing

Proficient

Accomplished

Distinguished

3 Rating CategoriesDoes Not Meet Expected Growth

Meets Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Teacher StatusRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs

▲

In Need of Improvement

Effective Highly Effective

Standards 1-5In the year

Standard 6Three-year rolling average

6 6 62 years ago

1 year ago

Currentyear+ + /3)

)

1 5432Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

KnowContent

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Any rating lower than proficient

And/Or

Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Proficient or Higher

on Standards1-5

And

Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth

Accomplishedor Higher

on Standards1-5

And

Exceeds Expected Growth

Growth Data for Teachers

MSLsCourses

Focused on Performance

Locally Developed Courses

A B C D

• Guidance from DPI by 2013- 2014 on appropriate methods to gather and analyze evidence of student learning based on the:– Performance-based nature of content area and NCES

– Varying amounts of instructional time and program configurations

EOCs, EOGs, and VoCATS

Piloting the Standard 6: Student Growth Portfolio

Ice Breaker

Take Off & Touch Down

• Who do you educate?

• How far did you drive for today?

• What content area in the Spring 2013 pilot do you represent?

Pilot Participants

Arts Education

(AE)

Healthful Living(HL)

World Languages

(WL)Others

Check your 5-digit Pilot ID . . .

2 letters for content area

3 numbers for role in pilot< 099 = Submitter> 100 = Evaluator

Purpose of Pilot

To inform the guidance for implementing the portfolio process

Overview• Comprehensive

• Measure student growth

• 3-6 Samples (individuals and groups)

• Reflect programs and courses taught

• Blind, holistic review done online by 2 colleagues with content area expertise

SGP: Full Scale vs. Pilot

• Initiation form with principal’s signature

• 3-6 samples with 2 evidences per sample

• System ID used to match for review

Proposed Full Scale Spring 2013 Pilot• Online profile with no

signature needed

• 2 samples with 2 evidences per sample

• Pilot ID from NCDPI used to match for review

SGP: Full Scale vs. Pilot

• Descriptive feedback from review

• Year 1 implementation is 2013-2014

• All AE, HL and WL teachers

Proposed Full Scale Spring 2013 Pilot• Generate list of

phrases for descriptive feedback

• Pilot informs NCEES

• 35 educators from each content area

TimelineDate Activity

Feb. 25 Pilot Training (see agenda)

Mar. 4 Launch of pilot work with online platform

March SGP samples chosen, described and uploaded by Submitters

Apr. 8 Pilot Webinar (4:00-5:00 p.m. Eastern)

April Student Growth Portfolios reviewed by Evaluators (2 rounds)

May 6 Pilot ends and online evaluation survey launched

May 13 Online evaluation survey closes at 11:30 pm

18

How do you measure growth?

• Two points in time

• Tools for measuring

• Two evidences

• Method or tool for recording

• Comparison of two evidences

• Something specific to measure

19

How do you measure growth?

20

21

Developing the Standard 6: SGP

Initiation

Submission Form A

Portfolio Planning Template

Student/GroupSample 1

Evidence 1 A (Pre) Evidence 1 B (Post)

Student Work Sample

Student/GroupSample 1

Evidence 1 A (Pre) Evidence 1 B (Post)

Student Work Sample

Submission Form B and C

Brain Break

Standard 6 and Ratings

• Portfolio rating informs Standard 6

• 3-year rolling average from Standard 6 combines with NCEES Standards 1-5 to determine overall status

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Meets Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Student/Group2.V.2.3 Create art from real and imaginary sources of inspiration.

Evidence 1 A (Pre) Evidence 1 B (Post)

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Meets Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Standard 6 and Ratings

Student/Group1.V.3.2 Execute control of a variety of media.

Evidence 1 A (Pre) Evidence 1 B (Post)

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Meets Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Standard 6 and Ratings

Scoring the Standard 6: SGP

Exceeds

MeetsDoes Not

Meet

Exit Ticket to Lunch

Introducing the Standard 6: SGP Online Platform at NC Education

Compiling & Responding to Questions about the Standard 6: SGP Pilot and Process

Wrap-Up & Next Steps