8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
1/30
Ethical Theory
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
2/30
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
3/30
The Trolley Problem: take 2
3
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
4/30
The Transplant Surgeon
4
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
5/30
Consequentialism & Deontology
Consequentialismrightness depends on consequences
Deontologyrightness depends at least in part on a formalmoral rule or principle
5
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
6/30
6
$180 billion government bailout
A few months later...
$165 million in bonuses to 400 executives
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
7/30
Relativism7
What I feel is right is right. What I feel is wrong is wrong.Jean Jacques Rousseau
Ethical Subjectivism - There are no objective moral truths only an individuals feelings or preferences.
Some Criticism:
No arbitration between views possible, other than
the exercise of power.
Anyone can harm others if it feels right to them
And we do tend to think that arbitration is possible we do it all the time. And that its wrong to harmothers for such a reason.
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
8/30
Relativism8
Cultural Relativism -All (not some) moral values are nothingmore than cultural customs and laws.
Some Criticism:
Guilty of deriving ought from is (the Naturalist Fallacy).
Offers no criteria for distinguishing between reformers andcriminals
Cant explain moral progress
Encourages blind conformity to cultural norms, rather thanrational analysis of moral issues (which we think is important)
Doesnt work in pluralistic cultures (like ours)
Can lead to suspicion and mistrust of other cultures
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
9/30
Following the law is notthesame thing as acting morally
Laws can be immoral
Laws can provideinsufficient direction
Laws can be ambiguous
Doing the moral minimumis doing what you are
morally obligatedto do (not doing bad)
Doing good: going beyond your obligations
9
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
10/30
Moral Development & Maturity10
Kohlbergs stages of moral development
The more you think about your choices,the more you think about your reasonsand the reasons of others, the moreyou open your mind and widen yourhorizons, the more your moralreasoning is likely to mature!
Postconventional thinking doesnot need to reject cultural norms,but rather to evaluate them. If it
accepts them, its because theyare the right norms to have not
because they are the norms wedo have,
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
11/30
Some Criticism:
Justifies any self-interested action nomatter how it effects others.
Selfishness is usually associated with
immorality, altruism with morality
11
The achievement of his own happiness is mans highest
moral purpose
Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness (1964)
Ethical Egoism - everyone ought to do what is inhis or her own rational self-interest
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
12/30
Utilitarianism
The greatest good for the greatest number
The morally right act for an agentAat a timet is that act available toAat t, that willmaximize the total amount of good in theworld (that will have the best consequences).
Jeremy Bentham (1748 1831)
12
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
13/30
Hedonistic Utilitarianism
What is good?
Pleasure and the absence of pain are good
Pleasure is any sensation you would rather havethan no sensation at all; and pain is any sensationyoud rather not have than no sensation at all.
.
13
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
14/30
What Bentham thinks are theadvantages of Utilitarianism
Determinate in principle in principle, you can use thehedonic calculus to get an actual answer to the questionof what should I do in this case?.
Neutralistictreats everyone in the same way
Realisticits based on real psychology. It works withpeople as it finds them and organizes society so that they
being that way actually has good consequences foreveryone.
Non-metaphysicalit doesn't make goodness/badnessright/wrongness some sort of weird qualities. What in theworld is a natural right?
Non-elitistit counts all sentient creatures. And all types ofpleasures equally
14
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
15/30
The Hedonic Calculus
Perform the action-alternative with the highest total
Determine Intensity x duration
Determine Probability
Calculate Total = (intensity x duration) x Probability
15
For each action-alternative:
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
16/30
How do we regard differenttypes of pleasures?
What counts as pleasure?
Are there higher and lower pleasures?
Bentham: the source of pleasure doesnt matter
J.S. Mill: There is an objective quality to differentpleasures that should also be factor into ourcalculations
Quality comes from what people would choose ifthey had access to all possible pleasures
Bentham: Its a subjective criterion Pushpin is asgood as poetry
What about sadistic and masochistic pleasures?
16
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
17/30
Are all goods commensurable?
Can all pleasures be roughly compared? Can theybe reduced to some sort of homogenous value?
17
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
18/30
Utilitarianism & business
18
Market view Free and unregulated markets would maximize the overall good
by most efficiently connecting supply with demand.
Administrative view Policy experts manipulate the economy to attempt to
improve the outcome beyond the capacities of a purely free market.
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
19/30
Criticisms of Utilitarianism
Its too difficult to apply
People care about more than just pleasure
We can not reduce all human goods into quantifiableunits which can be aggregated and compared
There is no non-arbitrary limit to how far into the future weshould consider consequences
Intention is important for determining the moralstatus of actions, but no room for this in utilitarianism
Justifies acts that seem to be plainly wrong likemurder and rape
19
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
20/30
Other forms of Utilitarianism
Rule Utilitarianism - Always act according tothe rule that would produce the most utility
in the world (vs.act
utilitarianism)
Preference Utilitarianism: Always act so as tomaximize satisfaction of peoples
preferences (vs. HedonisticUtilitarianism)
20
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
21/30
Rights and duties
One way to think of a right is as a trump againstthe claims of the general welfare.
Rights hook into correlative duties: if you have a rightnot to be killed, then I have a duty not to kill you.
Negative rights are rights to non-interference
Positive rights are rights to aid
entitlements tobe provided with something
Right to due process of law in the US, to freeeducation, to healthcare coverage, etc.
A right not to be killed, have your property stolen, raped, etc.
21
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
22/30
Kantianism
Moral actions follow from the right moral principles
To find out whether a moral principle is ok to actfrom, you see if its compatible with theCategorical Imperative (CI)
All moral rules must rest on a categoricalimperative (CI)
Hypothetical imperatives are conditional,rather than categorical/absolute
How do we know if our moral principles are good ones?
22
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
23/30
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
24/30
Step 3: Imagine the world that would result fromconjoining all the laws of physics, psychology,sociology, etc. with the law you made in Step 2
The Categorical Imperative
Step 4: Test the maxim
If a maxim of action fails the CI tests, it is NOT permissible toact on that maxim! AND that means that not to do that
thing is a moral duty.
The contradiction in conception testIn the socialworld of (3) would it be possible to achieve yourend by means of the action you proposed in 1?
The Contradiction in the Will test - Could Iconsistently willthat this social world actually exist?
24
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
25/30
Criticisms of Kantianism
Its absolutist and inflexible (What if the negative consequencesare too high?)
Some maxims which seem to be ok, fail the CI test. (e.g. Go tothe beach on a sunny day)
We have no positive formula for constructingmaxims, so it seems we may propose any numberof maxims for any action. Which should we follow?
The whole approach of basing morality onrationality, rather than feelings is mistaken.
25
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
26/30
Some major moral principles
The Principle of Nonmaleficence We ought toact in ways that do not cause needless harm orinjury to others
The Principle of Beneficence We should act inways that promote the welfare of other people
The Principle of Utility We should act in such away as to bring about the greatest benefit andthe least harm
26
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
27/30
Virtue Ethics
Those that your moral exemplarsposes
Virtue ethic focuses on having a good character tellsyou what kind of person you ought to be
It is action-guiding in the sense that it recommendsthat you become the kind of person that will do what
is right perhaps instinctively
How do you become virtuous?
Develop the sort of habits or instincts that a virtuousperson has through good upbringing, education,
reflection, experience, and effort
What habits or instincts are these?
27
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
28/30
Virtue Ethics the virtues
Rationality, intelligence, tenacity, capability,patience, prudence, skillfulness, shrewdness,proficiency, etc.
Moral Virtues
Practical/non-moral virtues
Benevolence, compassion, honesty, charity, sincerity,
sympathy, respect consideration, kindness,thoughtfulness, loyalty, fairness, etc.
28
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
29/30
Criticisms of Virtue Ethics
(1) Different cultural groups have had different,sometimes conflicting, opinions on whatconstitutes a virtue. If Virtue Ethics has no universal
basis, it leads to an undesirable cultural relativism.
(2) Virtue Ethics may praise certain charactertraits, but this provides us with no or insufficient
practical guidance about which specific actionsto perform
29
8/13/2019 week2-ethicaltheoriesppt
30/30
Using Child labor30