Top Banner
Week 5 ETEC 668 Quantitative Research in Educational Technology Dr. Seungoh Paek February 12, 2014
76

Week 5 ETEC 668 Quantitative Research in Educational Technology

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Week 5 ETEC 668 Quantitative Research in Educational Technology. Dr . Seungoh Paek February 12, 2014. Tonight ’ s Agenda. Continuing SPSS Introduction to PSPP Introduction to RStudio Introduction to Probability Group Discussion for Research Paper. Continuing Week 4. Using SPSS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Week 5 ETEC 668 Quantitative Research in Educational Technology

Dr. Seungoh Paek

February 12, 2014

Page 2: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Tonight’s Agenda

Continuing SPSS Introduction to PSPP Introduction to RStudio Introduction to Probability Group Discussion for Research Paper

Page 3: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Continuing Week 4

Page 4: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Using SPSS

Page 5: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Using SPSS

Page 6: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

igma Freud & Descriptive Statistics

A Picture is Really Worth a Thousand Words

Page 7: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Histograms with Polygon

Hand Drawn Histogram

Page 8: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Cool Ways to Chart Data

Line Chart

Page 9: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Cool Ways to Chart Data

Pie Chart

Page 10: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Using the Computer to Illustrate Data

Creating Histogram Graphs

Page 11: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Using the Computer to Illustrate Data

Creating Bar Graphs

Page 12: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Using the Computer to Illustrate Data

Creating Line Graphs

Page 13: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Using the Computer to Illustrate Data

Creating Pie Graphs

Page 14: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

A Taste of PSPP

Page 15: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

PSPP

Download PSPP - For Mac, click here. For Window, click here.

Page 16: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

A TASTE of RSTudio

Page 17: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

R

R is a free software environment for statistical computing and graphics.

Page 18: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

RStudio

RStudio is a free and open source integrated development environment (IDE) for R, a programming language for statistical computing and graphics.

Page 19: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Probability, Samples, Bell Curve, z Scores, Hypotheses, Hypothesis Testing, &

significance

Chapter 7 & Chapter 8

Page 20: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Probability

Page 21: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Why Probability?

Describe and predict what we don’t know from current data

Basis for the Degree of confidence a Hypothesis is “true”– statistical significance

Page 22: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Examples

• Flip a coin– 2 possible outcomes– Heads or Tails – 50% chance each

• Role a Die – 6 possible outcomes– 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 16.6% chance each

• Flip 2 coins– How many possible outcomes?– What % chance for each?

• Flip 2 coins– How many possible outcomes?– What % chance for each?

Page 23: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Examples

• Flip 2 coins– 4 possible outcomes– 25% chance each

Outcome Coin A Coin B

1

2

3

4

Page 24: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Sample v Population

Page 25: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Definitions

Population– The large group to which you would like to

generalize your findings

Sample– The smaller, representative group of the

population used for research.

Page 26: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Characteristics of a sample

Needs to be representative Truly random = representative = unbiased Sampling error – – how well the sample represents the population

Size matters – – larger sample = more representative

Page 27: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Mathematical Symbols

Mean – Population = μ– Sample = X

Standard Deviation– Population = σ

– Sample = SD

Variance- Population = σ2

- Sample = SD2

Number of Cases- Population = N

- Sample = n

Page 28: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

The Normal Curve

Page 29: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

The Normal curve

Page 30: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

More Normal Curve

Page 31: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

About Normal Curve

Almost all scores fall between -3 and +3 SD from mean– 99.74%

Specific percentages between points on x-axis– 2 or more normal curves can be compared

Page 32: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Normal Curve and Percents

Page 33: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

z Scores

Page 34: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

The z Score

The number of standard deviations from the mean

Negative scores are below (left of) the mean

Positive scores are above (right of) the mean

Page 35: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

The z Score

Standard Score Allows you to compare apples and

oranges The probability of a score occurring

=

Page 36: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Hypotheses

Page 37: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

What is a Hypothesis?

An “educated guess” Direct extension of the question Translates problem or research question into a

testable form Two types– Null Hypothesis

– Research Hypothesis

Page 38: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

A Good Hypothesis

Declarative statement Expected relationship between variables Reflection of theory/literature Brief, to the point Testable

Page 39: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Why a Null Hypothesis?

No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.

~ Albert Einstein

Page 40: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

The Null Hypothesis

Statement of no relationship

– Two things are equal

H0 : μA = μB

Refers to Population Indirectly tested

Page 41: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

The Research Hypothesis

Definite Statement– Relationship exists between variables

Two types– Nondirectional - H1 : XA ≠ XB

– Directional - H1 : X1 > X2

Refers to sample Directly tested

Page 42: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Hypothesis Testing

Page 43: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Hypothesis Testing

All events have a probability associated with them

p = your guess of chancep < .05

– .05 or 5% in Education and Psychology– 5% likelihood of results occurring by chance

alone

Page 44: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Error types

Type I– Reject H0 when you should not

Type II– Fail to reject H0 when you should

Page 45: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Error Table

The Real Situation

(Unknown to investigator)

Investigator’s Decision

H0 is True H0 is False

Reject H0 Type I errorCorrect decision

Do Not reject H0Correct decision

Type II error

Page 46: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Significance

Page 47: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Statistical

Based on probability Research was technically successful

H0 was rejected

P value– Education p < .05 = 5% chance

– Medical p < .01 or .001 = 1% or .1% chance

Page 48: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Practical

Does it mean anything to the population?– Is that new treatment worth the cost?– Are my students really doing that much better?

Page 49: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Questions?

Page 50: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Stating the Research Question

February 12, 2014

Page 51: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Where are we now?

Identified a problem focus Familiar with the literature Next step – determine specific questions for

your research study Research questions provide the basis for

planning research study – design, materials, data analysis

Page 52: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Can meaningful learning be enhanced by using a computer to personalize math word problems for each student?

Page 53: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Research Questions

vs

Research Hypotheses

Page 54: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Research Questions in Qualitative Research

Preferred when little is known about a phenomenonUsed when previous studies report conflicting resultsUsed to describe phenomena

Page 55: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Research Hypotheses for Quantitative Research

Educated guess or presumption based on literature

States the nature of the relationship between two or more variables

Predicts the research outcome Research study designed to test the

relationship described in the hypothesis

Page 56: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Null Hypotheses

Implicit complementary statement to the research hypothesis

States no relationship/difference exists between variables

Statistical test performed on the null Assumed to be true until support for the

research hypothesis is demonstrated

Page 57: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Alternative Hypotheses

Directional hypothesis– Precise statement indicating the nature and

direction of the relationship/difference between variables

Nondirectional hypothesis– States only that relationship/difference will

occur

Page 58: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Assessing Hypotheses

Simply stated? Single sentence? At least two variables? Variables clearly stated? Is the relationship/difference precisely

stated? Testable?

Page 59: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Types of Variables

Variable – Element that is identified in the hypothesis or

research question– Property or characteristic of people or things

that varies in quality or magnitude – Must be identified as independent or dependent

Page 60: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Independent Variables (IV)

Manipulation or variation of this variable is the cause of change in other variables

Technically, independent variable is the term reserved for experimental studies– Also called antecedent variable, experimental

variable, treatment variable, causal variable, predictor variable

Page 61: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Dependent Variables (DV)

The variable of primary interest Research question/hypothesis describes,

explains, or predicts changes in it The variable that is influenced or changed

by the independent variable– In non-experimental research, also called

criterion variable, outcome variable

Page 62: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Intervening or Mediating Variables

Intervening/Mediating variable– Presumed to explain or provide a link between

independent and dependent variables– Relationship between the IV and DV can only be

explained when the intervening variable is present

– E.g. effect of study prep on test scores– Organization of study ideas into a framework

(intervening/mediating)

Page 63: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Control Variables

Special type of IV that can potentially influence the DV

Use statistical procedures (e.g. analysis covariance) to control for these variables

May be demographic or personal variables that need to be “controlled” so that true influence of IV on DV can be determined

Page 64: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Confounding Variables

Confounding variable– Confuses or obscures the effect of independent

on dependent– Makes it difficult to isolate the effects of the

independent variable – Typically cannot be directly measured or

observed– Researchers comment on the influence after

study is completed

Page 65: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Relationship Between Independent and Dependent Variables

Cannot specify independent variables without specifying dependent variablesNumber of independent and dependent variables depends on the nature and complexity of the studyThe number and type of variables dictates which statistical test will be used

Page 66: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Model for Writing Descriptive Questions & Hypotheses

Identify IV, DV & any intervening/moderating variables

Specify descriptive questions for each IV, DV & intervening variable

Write inferential questions that relate variables or compare groups

Page 67: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Scenario

A researcher wants to study the relationship of critical thinking skills to student achievement in science classes for 8th-graders in a large metropolitan school district. The researcher controls for the effects of prior grades in science classes and parents’ educational attainment.

Page 68: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Step 1: Identify variables

What is the IV?

Page 69: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Step 1: Identify variables

What is the IV?- Critical thinking skills (measured on an

instrument)

Page 70: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Step 1: Identify variables

What is the DV?

Page 71: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Step 1: Identify variables

What is the DV?- Student achievement (measured by grades)

Page 72: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Step 1: Identify variables

What are the control variables?

Page 73: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Step 1: Identify variables

What are the control variables?– Prior grades in science class– Educational attainment of parents

Page 74: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Descriptive Questions

How do the students rate on critical thinking skills?

What are the students’ achievement grades in science classes?

What are the students’ prior grades in science classes?

What is the educational attainment of the parents of the 8th graders?

Page 75: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

Inferential Questions

Does critical thinking ability relate to student achievement?

Does critical thinking ability relate to student achievement, controlling for the effects of prior grades in science and the educational attainment of the 8th-graders’ parents?

Page 76: Week 5  ETEC 668 Quantitative Research  in Educational Technology

What to do Week 5

1. Do the required readings for Week 06.– Salkind, N. J. Chapter 16. Redicting Who’ll Win the Super Bowl: Using

Linear Regression– Salkind, N. J. Chapter 20. The Ten (or More) Best Internet Sites for

Statistics Stuff

2. Continue the group discussion on the final research paper, and post the 1) literature review outline and 2) research questions for your paper to the Forum in Laulima (Due by Tuesday, February 18th).