Top Banner

of 28

WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

Apr 13, 2018

Download

Documents

ReNews It
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    1/28

    Exhibit A

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    2/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 1

    CAUSE NO. 2013- 44862

    WEBSLEUTHS. COM, LLC AND ) I N THE DI STRI CT COURT OF SUSAN PRUI TT, )

    PLAI NTI FFS, ) ) HARRI S COUNTY, T E X A S VS. ) ) PATRI CI A ARRI NGTON GRI FFI TH, ) DEFENDANT. ) 157TH J UDI CI AL DI STRI CT

    ******************************

    ORAL DEPOSI TI ON

    SUSAN PRUI TT

    J ul y 10, 2014

    ******************************

    ORAL DEPOSI TI ON of SUSAN PRUI TT, produced as a

    wi t ness at t he i nst ance of t he Def endant and dul y sworn,

    was t aken i n t he above- st yl ed and number ed cause on

    J ul y 10, 2014, f r om 9: 14 a. m. t o 12: 23 p. m. bef or e

    Roxanne K. Smi t h, Cer t i f i ed Shor t hand Repor t er i n and

    f or t he St at e of Texas, r epor t ed by comput er i zed

    st enotype machi ne at t he of f i ces of Hanszen Laport e,

    11767 Kat y Fr eeway, Sui t e 850, Houst on, Texas, pur suant

    t o t he Texas Rul es of Ci vi l Pr ocedur e and t he pr ovi si ons

    st at ed on t he r ecor d or at t ached her eto.

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    3/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 2

    1 A P P E A R A N C E S

    2

    3 FOR THE PLAI NTI FFS:4 Mr . Ci r o J . Samper i

    Hanszen Lapor t e5 11767 Kat y Fr eeway, Sui t e 850

    Houst on, Texas 770796 Tel ephone: ( 713) 522- 9444

    Facsi mi l e: ( 713) 524- 25807 E- Mai l : Csamper i @hanszenl apor t e. com

    8

    9 FOR THE DEFENDANT:10 Mr . Wi l l i am Pi erat t Demond

    Stat e Bar No. 2405893111 Demond & Hassan, PLLC

    2450 Loui si ana St r eet , Sui t e 400- 52812 Houst on, Texas 77006

    Tel ephone: ( 713) 701- 524013 Facs i mi l e: ( 713) 588- 8407

    E- Mai l : Wi l l i am. demond@demondhassan. com14

    15 ALSO PRESENT:

    16 Mr . Zachar y Cl ar k

    17

    18

    19 * * * * *

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    4/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 3

    1 I NDEX

    2 PAGE

    3 Appear ances. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

    4 SUSAN PRUI TT

    5 Exami nat i on by Mr . Demond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    6 Changes and Si gnatur e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

    7 Repor t er ' s Cer t i f i cat e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

    8

    9

    10 EXHI BI T I NDEX

    11 NO. DESCRI PTI ON PAGE

    12 1 Texas Fr anchi se Tax Publ i c I nf or mat i on 19

    13 Repor t

    14 2 Regul at i ons of Websl eut hs. com, L. L. C. 21

    15 3 Ar t i cl es of Or gani zat i on 3516 4 Sal e and Purchase Agreement 37

    17 5 E- Mai l Dated 4/ 25/ 11 66

    18

    19 * * * * *

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    5/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 20

    1 Websl eut hs?

    2 A. I ' m sur e i t ' s al l t hr oughout t he e- mai l s and

    3 t hr oughout t he mod f orum she sai d we were equal par t ners

    4 i n ever y way.

    5 Q. Can you poi nt me t o wher e she woul d have sai d

    6 t hat ? I s t hat somet hi ng you ar e f ami l i ar wi t h?

    7 A. I ' d have t o f i nd t hem, e- mai l s, what she t ol d

    8 t he moderators and admi ni st r ators, we were equal i n

    9 ever y aspect . I bel i eve she al so admi t t ed i t i n her10 admi ssi ons.

    11 Q. Di d you have an agr eement wi t h Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h

    12 wher e you woul d become t he onl y - - t he sol e member of

    13 Websl eut hs?

    14 A. No.

    15 Q. Di d you send Ms. Gr i f f i t h a copy of t he publ i c

    16 i nf or mat i on r epor t t hat you f i l ed on behal f of

    17 Websl eut hs?

    18 A. I bel i eve I di d.

    19 MR. SAMPERI : Exhi bi t 1, r i ght ?

    20 MR. DEMOND: I ' m sor r y. Exhi bi t 1.

    21 MR. SAMPERI : Okay.

    22 MR. DEMOND: Yes. Thank you f or t he

    23 c l ar i f i cat i on.

    24 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) What ar e t he r esponsi bi l i t i es

    25 of t he manager of Websl eut hs?

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    6/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 29

    1 THE WI TNESS: Okay.

    2 MR. DEMOND: - - anyt i me we can do t hat .

    3 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) To your knowl edge, has

    4 Ms. Gr i f f i t h ever owned an ent i t y t hat competed wi t h

    5 Websl eut hs?

    6 MR. SAMPERI : Obj ect i on, f orm.

    7 MR. DEMOND: And hol d on one second.

    8 Can I ask t he nat ur e of t he obj ect i on f or

    9 t hi s one?10 MR. SAMPERI : I t hi nk i t ' s a l i t t l e vague.

    11 MR. DEMOND: Okay. I ' l l cl ar i f y t hat . No

    12 probl em.

    13 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) Do you al l ege t hat Ms. Gr i f f i t h

    14 ever owned an ent i t y t hat compet ed wi t h Websl eut hs?

    15 MR. SAMPERI : Obj ect i on, f or m, j ust on t he

    16 " compet ed" par t .

    17 MR. DEMOND: Cl ar i f y "competed"?

    18 MR. SAMPERI : ( Noddi ng head. )

    19 MR. DEMOND: No pr obl em.

    20 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) Do you bel i eve t hat

    21 Ms. Gr i f f i t h ever had i nt er est s t hat wer e adver se t o

    22 Websl eut hs t hat har med Websl euths i n some way?

    23 A. I nt ent i onal l y, no, I don' t t hi nk she di d.

    24 Q. How about uni nt ent i onal l y?

    25 A. I t hi nk she has damaged Websl eut hs.

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    7/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 39

    1 A. "Managi ng member compensat i on. Manager may

    2 r ecei ve compensat i on as det ermi ned by al l members f or

    3 servi ces pr ovi ded i n t he management of t he L. L. C. "

    4 Q. And was t hi s pr ovi si on ever changed, t o your

    5 knowl edge?

    6 A. No.

    7 Q. Okay. I s t here any amount of compensat i on t hat

    8 i s l i st ed i n t he r egul at i ons t hat wi l l be pai d t o t he

    9 manager ?10 A. No, not t hat I know of .

    11 Q. And di d you cause t hese r egul at i ons t o be

    12 dr af t ed? Act ual l y, l et me st r i ke t hat .

    13 Di d you cause Mr . Pr ui t t t o dr af t t hese

    14 r egul at i ons on behal f of t he ent i t y?

    15 A. What do you mean di d I cause?

    16 Q. Di d you ask hi m t o dr af t t hese? Di d he dr af t

    17 t hem on your behal f ?

    18 MR. SAMPERI : Obj ect i on, f orm.

    19 A. On my behal f ? No. On behal f of Websl eut hs he

    20 dr ew t hem.

    21 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) Di d you i ni t i at e t he pr ocess of

    22 havi ng t hese dr af t ed?

    23 A. I asked hi m t o dr af t t hem.

    24 Q. Okay. So, Ms. Gr i f f i t h di dn' t cal l up

    25 Mr . Pr ui t t and say, wi l l you pl ease dr af t t hese; i s t hat

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    8/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 40

    1 accur at e?

    2 A. She di d not cal l hi m, no.

    3 Q. You asked hi m t o do i t ; i s t hat cor r ect ?

    4 A. Yes.

    5 Q. Di d Ms. Gr i f f i t h ever si gn a bi l l of sal e as

    6 r equi r ed by t he sal e and pur chase agr eement ?

    7 A. No.

    8 Q. She di d not .

    9 Okay. Di d she ever assi gn an i nt er est i n10 Websl eut hs t o you?

    11 A. I bel i eve t hr ough t he sal e and pur chase

    12 agr eement , 50 per cent .

    13 Q. And when di d she do t hat ?

    14 A. May 1st , 2011.

    15 Q. Can you t al k t o me about t he damages t hat you

    16 have per sonal l y i ncur r ed - - st r i ke t hat .

    17 I n your pet i t i on, t her e' s an al l egat i on

    18 t hat Ms. Gr i f f i t h has br oken pr omi ses t o you. Do you,

    19 i n f act , bel i eve t hat Ms. Gr i f f i t h has br oken pr omi ses

    20 t o you?

    21 A. Yes.

    22 Q. What promi ses has she broken?

    23 A. The way t he company woul d be r un, Websl eut hs

    24 was al ways t o be f i r st . I mpr ovement s, we coul d never do

    25 any i mprovement s. She l ed me t o bel i eve t he i ncome

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    9/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 42

    1 websi t e needed, i mprovement s t o t he websi t e woul d come

    2 out of t he ad r evenue f i r st . We' ve been needi ng a

    3 second server f or year s. I mean, t he si t e kept goi ng

    4 down. Every t i me a bi g case woul d hi t , we' d go down.

    5 Members were get t i ng di sgust ed; and, you know, t here was

    6 never enough money i n t he account . She al ways drai ned

    7 t he account to do t hat .

    8 When we got r eady t o do i t i n Apr i l or May

    9 of l ast year , t he account was over dr awn; and our t ech10 had t ol d her when he was goi ng t o be doi ng t hat and t he

    11 money he woul d need. The money wasn' t t her e. I t was

    12 gone. We wer e even over drawn.

    13 Q. Di d Websl eut hs r equi r e a second ser ver bef ore

    14 t he sal e and pur chase agr eement was si gned?

    15 A. I ' m not sur e. The t ech guy woul d have t o t el l

    16 you t hat . The pr obl ems may have st ar t ed dur i ng t he

    17 Ant hony t r i al , whi ch i s r i ght ar ound t he t i me we became

    18 part ners. Because t here was so many peopl e hi t t i ng t he

    19 si t e at once, i t woul d knock us down. I know upgr ades

    20 were needed, and i t was never made.

    21 Q. So, on t hi s l i st of pr omi ses t hat you al l ege

    22 t hat she' s broken, have you been personal l y harmed by

    23 t hese al l egedl y br oken pr omi ses?

    24 A. Yes, I t hi nk so.

    25 Q. How have you been har med?

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    10/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 45

    1 f i gure out what I ' m owed?

    2 Q. Was her of f er - - was her of f er cont i ngent upon

    3 what was owed, or was i t si mpl y an of f er t o gi ve you

    4 money?

    5 MR. SAMPERI : Obj ecti on, f or m.

    6 MR. DEMOND: That ' s f ai r . That ' s a f ai r

    7 obj ect i on, Counsel or . I ' l l st r i ke t hat questi on.

    8 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) When she of f ered t o gi ve you

    9 money, was i t cont i ngent upon anyt hi ng? Was t her e

    10 any - -

    11 A. I bel i eve she sai d, agai nst what you' r e owed.

    12 Q. Okay. Okay. Does Ms. Gr i f f i t h st i l l hol d

    13 Websl eut hs asset s - - any asset s t hat bel ong t o

    14 Websl euths?

    15 A. I woul d have t o go t hr ough t he l i st t o see i f16 she' s changed ever ythi ng. I know she at t empt ed t o at

    17 one poi nt af t er t he l awsui t was f i l ed. So, I don' t

    18 know.

    19 Q. Okay.

    20 MR. DEMOND: I ' m t r yi ng t o f i gur e out how

    21 l ong we' ve been goi ng.

    22 MR. SAMPERI : About an hour .

    23 MR. DEMOND: Woul d t hi s be a decent t i me

    24 t o t ake a br eak?

    25 MR. SAMPERI : We can t ake a br eak.

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    11/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 48

    1 Q. Have you f ul f i l l ed al l of your obl i gat i ons

    2 under t he sal e and pur chase agr eement ?

    3 A. I bel i eve I have.

    4 Q. At t he t i me t hat you ent er ed i nt o your

    5 agr eement s wi t h Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h, di d you t r ust her ?

    6 A. Yes, I di d.

    7 Q. Do you bel i eve she t r ust ed you?

    8 A. Yes.

    9 Q. Di d you i nt end f or her t o t r ust you?10 A. Yes.

    11 Q. Di d you i nt end f or her t o have conf i dence i n

    12 you as her busi ness part ner?

    13 A. Yes.

    14 Q. Do you - - ar e you f ami l i ar wi t h t he concept of

    15 sel f - deal i ng?

    16 A. Not r eal l y, no.

    17 Q. Okay. I ' ve hear d you ment i on t oday t hat part

    18 of your compl ai nt i s t hat you' ve pr ovi ded f unds. You' ve

    19 gi ven money. Di d you gi ve money t o Ms. Gr i f f i t h or t o

    20 Websl eut hs?

    21 A. Bot h.

    22 Q. How much money di d you gi ve t o Ms. Gr i f f i t h?

    23 A. On a per sonal l evel ? I s t hat what you' r e

    24 aski ng?

    25 Q. Sur e. Yes.

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    12/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 49

    1 A. Pr i or t o becomi ng a par t ner , I t hi nk i t was

    2 around 1200. Af t er we became part ners, I t hi nk I may

    3 have gi ven her 300 her e and 50 t her e, you know, a

    4 hundr ed t here.

    5 Q. Di d you gi ve her money any ot her way t hat

    6 wasn' t as a par t ner ?

    7 A. That ' s t he money I ' m di scussi ng. That was not

    8 as a par t ner .

    9 Q. Okay.10 A. I mean, t hat was j ust I f el t sor r y f or her .

    11 She al ways needed money.

    12 Q. Wer e t hose l oans or wer e t hose gi f t s?

    13 A. Those wer e gi f t s. I woul d say gi f t s.

    14 Q. And t hen t he money, you sai d t hat t here was a

    15 second set of money you t hat gave t o Websl eut hs; i s t hat

    16 correct?

    17 A. Wel l , I gave t o Tr i ci a f or my i nt er est i n

    18 Websl eut hs.

    19 Q. So, t hi s i s t hen - - ar e you di scussi ng t he

    20 pur chase pr i ce?

    21 A. Yes.

    22 Q. Okay. I ' m goi ng t o l eave t hat al one f or now.

    23 A. Okay.

    24 Q. I don' t mean t o di scuss your pur chase.

    25 A. Okay.

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    13/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 50

    1 Q. I ' m j ust di scussi ng t he money t hat you' ve

    2 gi ven - - I i nt end t o onl y be di scussi ng t he money t hat

    3 you' ve gi ven t o Tr i ci a and t he ent i t y, not t he pur chase

    4 pr i ce f or t he ent i t y.

    5 A. Ri ght .

    6 Now, t here was al so a 6, 000- dol l ar l oan I

    7 bel i eve a mont h af t er we became par t ner s. That was a

    8 l oan. We had a not e drawn, and she di d pay i t back.

    9 Q. Okay. What ot her moneys have you gi ven t o10 Websl eut hs besi des - - you ment i oned t he $6, 000 t hat was

    11 al r eady pai d back. You ment i oned 1200- dol l ar gi f t you

    12 t hat gave t o Tr i ci a; i s t hat cor r ect?

    13 A. I sai d t hat was t o Tr i ci a.

    14 Q. Ri ght . I ' m sorr y.

    15 A. And t hat was i n di f f erent i ncr ement s here and

    16 t her e.

    17 Q. No probl em.

    18 What ot her moneys have you gi ven t o

    19 Websl eut hs?

    20 A. Do you mean my expenses or - - you know, I ' ve

    21 put i n, l i ke, 30 her e or t her e j ust t o cover - - or maybe

    22 60. I t was j ust t o cover t he over dr af t . Ot her t han t he

    23 expenses, t hat ' s about i t , I guess.

    24 Q. And t hen your expenses, what i s t he approxi mat e

    25 t ot al of your expenses? I ' m not aski ng you f or a

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    14/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 58

    1 pai d t hi ngs f or Tr i ci a di r ect.

    2 Q. The ad f r ee, do you consi der t hat t o be a

    3 donat i on t o Websl eut hs?

    4 A. No, no. But f or some r eason, t hey wr ote about

    5 i t , The onl y money I ' ve gi ven i s f or t hat t ype of t hi ng.

    6 Q. So, di d anybody r espond sayi ng t hey had

    7 actual l y gi ven a donat i on t o Websl eut hs?

    8 A. No. I t was j ust peopl e who had gi ven money t o

    9 Tr i ci a mai nl y f or her benef i t wi t h t he el ectr i c bi l l or10 what ever . Pai d f or her phar macy bi l l .

    11 Q. And do you bel i eve t hat Ms. Gr i f f i t h sol i ci t ed

    12 t hose donat i ons?

    13 A. I do.

    14 Q. Do you have a pr obl em wi t h t hat ?

    15 A. Yes, I do.

    16 Q. Can you t el l me why you have a pr obl em wi t h

    17 t hat ?

    18 A. We don' t al l ow t hat on our si t e f or members,

    19 much l ess owner s.

    20 Q. I s t hat - -

    21 A. She somet i mes sol i ci t ed f or t he ser ver f ee or

    22 wi l l go under - - i t ' s not t r ue. Ther e i s money t her e

    23 f or t he ser ver f ee. I t was f or her own benef i t . I t ' s

    24 not up t o our members t o support her . I t ' s not up t o me

    25 t o support her . I mean, I t hought i t was wr ong; and I

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    15/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 59

    1 don' t want peopl e associ at i ng wi t h me wi t h t hat , t hat

    2 behi nd t he scenes we' r e sol i ci t i ng money f r om our

    3 members. There' s money t o pay f or t hat websi t e. We

    4 don' t need donat i ons. We don' t t ake donat i ons.

    5 Q. I s t her e a pr ohi bi t i on somewher e i n t he

    6 r egul at i ons or sal e and pur chase agr eement or ar t i cl es

    7 of i ncor por at i ons or anyt hi ng l i ke t hat seeki ng

    8 donat i ons f r om member s?

    9 A. No. I t ' s j ust a mat t er of r i ght or wr ong.10 Q. Do you bel i eve i t ' s a cr i me t o sol i ci t money

    11 f r om member s?

    12 MR. SAMPERI : Obj ect i on, f orm.

    13 MR. DEMOND: That ' s okay.

    14 A. The way she di d I t hi nk i t ' s unt r ut hf ul . As

    15 f ar as a cr i me, I guess t hat woul d depend on how many

    16 and how much.

    17 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) Who was damaged by her r equest s

    18 f or moneys?

    19 A. I t hi nk t he members t hat gave i t t o her . They

    20 wer e l ed t o bel i eve t he websi t e mi ght go under i f t hey

    21 di dn' t hel p. That ' s how she got t o me.

    22 Q. Di d you - - once t hese member s came t o you and

    23 t ol d you what was happeni ng, di d you i nvest i gat e t hei r

    24 cl ai ms? Di d you l ook i nt o i t or f ol l ow up i n any way

    25 and ask f or document at i on or anyt hi ng l i ke t hat ?

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    16/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 68

    1 si nce t he f ormat i on of t he par t nershi p, an amount whi ch

    2 does not i ncl ude expenses t hat were pai d f or t he benef i t

    3 of t he company by Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h. Such compensat i on t o

    4 Susan Pr ui t t shal l be t aken i n i nt er val s so i t does not

    5 cause a hardshi p on t he cont i nued operat i on of

    6 Websl eut hs. com, L. L. C. Once Websl eut hs. com, L. L. C.

    7 becomes sol vent , Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h and Susan Pr ui t t wi l l

    8 each be ent i t l ed t o equal sal ar i es as per t hi s

    9 agr eement . Agr eed t o t hi s 25t h day of Apr i l , 2011.10 Susan Pr ui t t . "

    11 Q. Di d you send t hi s e- mai l t o Ms. Gr i f f i t h?

    12 A. Yes, I di d.

    13 Q. Di d she send you a r epl y?

    14 A. Yes.

    15 Q. And what di d her r epl y say?

    16 A. Agr eed t o t hi s 24t h day of Apr i l , 2011. She

    17 wr ote 24th.

    18 Q. What was t he date t hat Websl eut hs. com, L. L. C.

    19 was i ncorporated?

    20 A. I bel i eve i t was Apr i l 25t h.

    21 Q. Was i t t he same day - -

    22 A. 2011.

    23 Q. - - t hat you dr af t ed t hi s e- mai l ?

    24 A. Yes. Uh- huh. Yeah.

    25 Q. I n t hi s document you used t he phr ase

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    17/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 77

    1 A. No.

    2 Q. So, t hen once you i ncorporated, di d you expect

    3 her t o cont i nue t aki ng money f r om Websl eut hs?

    4 MR. SAMPERI : Obj ect i on, f orm.

    5 MR. DEMOND: What gr ounds?

    6 MR. SAMPERI : Same grounds.

    7 MR. DEMOND: We' ve est abl i shed t hat she

    8 bel i eved t hat she was, i n f act , t aki ng t he money.

    9 MR. SAMPERI : But I don' t t hi nk t hat get s10 you t o she' s cont i nui ng t o t ake money. She j ust

    11 bel i eved her , but she can' t t est i f y t hat i t ' s t r ue or

    12 not .

    13 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) Di d you - - di d you bel i eve t hat

    14 Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h woul d cont i nue t aki ng money af t er

    15 Websl eut hs i ncorporated?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 MR. DEMOND: Di d t hat f i x t he probl em?

    18 MR. SAMPERI : Yes.

    19 Q. ( By Mr . Demond) Can you descr i be f or me your

    20 under st andi ng of how Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h was goi ng t o be

    21 pai d af t er i ncor por at i on?

    22 A. I assumed t hat i t woul d be a dr aw, an onl i ne

    23 t r ansf er .

    24 Q. And di d you, i n f act , bel i eve t hat she woul d

    25 t ake - - t hat she woul d dr aw a sal ary up t o t he amount of

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    18/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 88

    1 Why di d you i nt end f or t hem t o become aware of t he

    2 l awsui t ? Why di d you want t hem t o know about i t ?

    3 A. I n or der t o f i el d any quest i ons f r om member s.

    4 Q. Okay. Di d some members or moderat or s post

    5 comment s i n t he f orum cal l ed The J ur y Room?

    6 A. Yes.

    7 Q. Di d you post anyt hi ng i n The J ury Room?

    8 A. I post ed t hat I had f i l ed sui t .

    9 Q. Di d you do t hat bef or e i t became publ i c10 knowl edge?

    11 A. No. I t was af t er .

    12 Q. Do you r emove any post s about t hi s l awsui t

    13 af t er i t was f i l ed?

    14 A. Di d I what ?

    15 Q. Remove post s f r om t he websi t e, f r om Websl eut hs.

    16 A. What t ype of post s?

    17 Q. The post s about t he l awsui t . Di d you t ake any

    18 of t hem down of f t he websi t e?

    19 A. I ' m not sur e t hat I di d. We di dn' t want our

    20 member s di scussi ng i t . I t woul d be - - I don' t recal l .

    21 Q. Why di dn' t you want your members di scuss i ng i t ?

    22 A. The damage i t mi ght do t o t he r eput at i on; and

    23 t hat ' s why I kept i t i n t he pr i vat e ar ea, t oo.

    24 Q. Was The J ur y Room a pr i vat e area?

    25 A. Yes, f or members onl y.

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    19/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 89

    1 Q. Maybe I ' m - - we' r e back t o t he members

    2 pr obl ems, and t hat ' s not your f aul t .

    3 A. Okay.

    4 Q. We' ve done t hi s t o your sel ves. So, l et ' s

    5 c l ar i f y i t as i t appl i es her e.

    6 A. Okay.

    7 Q. You sai d you di dn' t want members di scussi ng i t ,

    8 but you post ed i n an area t hat was member s onl y. So,

    9 I ' d l i ke t o under st and a l i t t l e mor e about how t hat10 wor ks. Maybe t her e' s a di st i nct i on of members t hat

    11 you' r e usi ng t hat I ' m not f ami l i ar wi t h. I t ' s a

    12 pr obl emat i c wor d i n t hi s cont ext . I get t hat .

    13 A. Ri ght .

    14 Q. You t ol d me you di dn' t want members di scuss i ng

    15 i t ; i s t hat cor r ect ?

    16 A. Ri ght .

    17 Q. And when you say members i n t hat cont ext , who

    18 do you mean?

    19 A. 70, 000 members we have. I mean, i t coul d get a

    20 l i t t l e out of cont r ol ; and al l we' ve done i s post t he

    21 document s and - - so, t hey can r ead. And I j ust f el t

    22 t hey shoul d be aware. You know, t hey were goi ng t o f i nd

    23 i t anyway.

    24 Q. And how many member s had access t o The J ur y

    25 Room?

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    20/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 90

    1 A. I t woul d be al l of our - - al l of our member s.

    2 But you have t o be a member .

    3 Q. I s t hat t he 70, 000?

    4 A. Yeah.

    5 Q. But you di dn' t want t hem di scussi ng i t ?

    6 A. No, not r eal l y.

    7 Q. Why di d you post i n The J ur y Room i f you

    8 di dn' t - - about t hi s l awsui t i f you di dn' t want t hem

    9 di scussi ng i t ?10 A. Because as members, I t hought t hey had a r i ght

    11 t o know i t had al r eady hi t other websi t es.

    12 Q. Di d you - - di d t hey begi n di scussi ng i t on

    13 Websl eut hs?

    14 A. I can' t r emember i f t hey di d or not . Ther e was

    15 a t hr ead, but I can' t r emember speci f i cal l y i f i t was

    16 about t he l awsui t .

    17 Q. Okay.

    18 MR. DEMOND: We' r e movi ng t owar ds t he end

    19 her e. We can t ake a br eak i f you l i ke. I don' t have a

    20 whol e l ot mor e l ef t .

    21 THE WI TNESS: Okay.

    22 MR. DEMOND: We can t ake a break i f you

    23 l i ke. I t ' s r eal l y up t o you.

    24 THE WI TNESS: What ' s a whol e l ot more?

    25 MR. DEMOND: I have another t wo pages, and

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    21/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 92

    1 shoul d be one of our l ast sect i ons, mor e or l ess.

    2 Di d you ever r equest r ei mbur sement of your

    3 expenses f r om Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h?

    4 A. No, I don' t t hi nk so.

    5 Q. Have you ever t aken deduct i ons on your personal

    6 t axes i n any year f or i t ems or expenses l i st ed wi t h

    7 Websl eut hs? Does t hat quest i on make sense t o you?

    8 A. Yeah, i t makes sense t o me. Woul dn' t t hat be

    9 i ncl uded i n t he K1? I use t he same CPA t o prepare our10 per sonal t axes t hat di d Websl eut hs' . So, i f you t ook

    11 t hem one pl ace, I doubt he woul d have t aken t hem

    12 another.

    13 Q. Okay. You' ve gi ven us a l ot of r ecei pt s i n

    14 di scover y, as you know.

    15 A. Ri ght .

    16 Q. Do you have any addi t i onal r ecei pt s t hat we

    17 don' t have t hat you' r e aware of ?

    18 A. I f I do, i t woul d pr obabl y be mi nor . I don' t

    19 t hi nk I do. I t hi nk t he l ast was 500 t o t he CPA.

    20 Q. Do you know how much you' r e seeki ng t o be

    21 r ei mbur sed by Websl eut hs f or your expenses?

    22 A. Whatever t hey ar e. I mean, I cal cul at e ar ound

    23 9, 000, I t hi nk.

    24 Q. Okay. On t he r equest f or di scl osur es whi ch you

    25 pr ovi ded t o us f ai r l y ear l y on i n t he case, you st at ed

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    22/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 102

    1 a br each of t he t r ust - -

    2 A. I don' t bel i eve so.

    3 Q. - - she pl aced i n you?

    4 A. I don' t bel i eve so.

    5 Q. Di d you i mpl y t o peopl e t hat Tr i ci a Gr i f f i t h

    6 was t aki ng money under f al se pret enses?

    7 A. Under f al se - - oh, I may have.

    8 Q. Do you know t o who?

    9 A. No.10 Q. Do you know when?

    11 A. I ' m t r yi ng t o t hi nk i f i t was j ust wi t h t he

    12 admi ni st r ators because we had been t ol d she had asked

    13 members t o pay t he ser ver f ee, and we knew t he money was

    14 t her e t o pay t he server f ee. So, t hat woul d have been

    15 f al se pr et ense.

    16 Q. Okay.

    17 A. And same wi t h Kat hy Rhodes. She - - Ms. Rhodes

    18 sai d t hat Tr i ci a sai d she needed t he ser ver f ee pai d,

    19 and she t r ansf er r ed t he money t o her account .

    20 Q. And how di d you communi cat e wi t h t hose peopl e

    21 on t hat i ssue? Was t hat vi a phone or vi a e- mai l or vi a

    22 message boar d?

    23 A. Kathy, t hat woul d be phone. She' s a phone

    24 per son and - -

    25 Q. I ' ve hear d t hat .

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    23/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 103

    1 A. Yeah. She woul d cal l me.

    2 Q. The others?

    3 A. I f t her e was di scussi on - - I ' m t r yi ng t o t hi nk

    4 i f I sai d somet hi ng t o Eddi e Yeager because we' d t al k

    5 about t he r evenue comi ng i n. And he used t o be pr i vy t o

    6 al l t hat , but I ' m t hi nki ng maybe Ed Yeager . Pr obabl y

    7 Mi chael Hagenst adt , and t hat woul d have been phone.

    8 Q. Do you bel i eve t hat doi ng so was a br each of

    9 her conf i dence or a br each of her t r ust i n anyone?10 A. I don' t t hi nk so. She was l yi ng t o t hese

    11 peopl e. What ki nd of br each i s t hat ? I mean, I don' t

    12 under st and how t hat - - I was concerned f or t hem and f or

    13 t hei r company and my very own r eputat i on t o be

    14 associ at ed wi t h somet hi ng l i ke t hat .

    15 Q. Wer e you equal l y concer ned f or Ms. Gr i f f i t h?

    16 A. Equal l y concer ned how?

    17 Q. Wel l , you j ust sai d t hat you were concerned f or

    18 t hese peopl e.

    19 And I guess what I ' m aski ng i s: Di d you

    20 el evat e your concer n f or t hem over your concer ns f or

    21 Ms. Gr i f f i t h?

    22 A. I pr obabl y di d. I t hought i t was decei t f ul .

    23 Q. Okay. So, back t o, I bel i eve i t ' s Exhi bi t 5.

    24 I t ' s goi ng t o be t he e- mai l - - 4/ 25 e- mai l t hat you

    25 wr ot e - -

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    24/28

    .

    Susan Pru i t t

    I

    Ju ly 10, 20

    1 4

    Page 105

    2

    CHANGES AND SIGNATURE

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    WITNESS NAME: SUSAN PRUITT

    PAGE

    LINE CHANGE

    7

    11 Evans not Edmonds

    8

    12 from the business

    11

    13

    want to contribute

    15

    6 period, not question mark

    30

    11 Haagenstad

    33

    8 Take

    out of

    11

    44

    4 comma

    after e-mail

    58

    22

    11

    we

    1

    l l

    go

    under

    62

    14 Mr Jaeger

    65

    13

    our should be

    the

    65

    25 Kerry

    85

    24 Cathy

    86

    3

    Haagenstad

    86

    4 Cathy

    87 15 i ts

    91 17 run

    to

    the

    97 1 viral

    102

    17 Cathy

    102

    23 Cathy

    103

    4 6

    Ed Jaeger

    103

    7 Haagenstad

    103

    13

    the company

    Associated

    Cour t Repor ters

    DATE: JULY

    10, 2014

    REASON

    Spelling

    Run on/garble

    Run

    on/garble

    Spelling

    Accent

    Spelling

    Run

    on/garble

    Spelling

    Spelling

    Spelling

    Spelling

    ????

    Spelling

    Spelling

    Spelling

    Spelling

    Run

    on/garble

    800-340-5881

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    25/28

    Susan

    Prui t t

    I

    July 10, 2014

    Page

    106

    I

    SUS N PRUITT, have

    read

    the

    foregoing

    deposit ion

    2 and hereby

    aff ix

    my

    signature that

    same

    s t rue

    and

    3 correct , except as noted above.

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    SUS N PRUITT

    THE ST TE OF

    COUNTY

    OF

    Before me, J-di$$Cl Cfiw.LL-=tt4Llb n

    th i s day

    10

    personal ly

    appeared SUS N

    PRUITT, known

    to

    me

    or

    proved

    11

    to

    me on the oath of

    or

    through

    12 descr iption of ident i ty card or

    13 other document)

    to be the

    person

    whose name

    is

    14

    subscribed

    to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged

    15 to

    me

    tha t he/she executed the same for the purpose

    and

    16 considerat ion

    therein

    expressed;.

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    3

    24

    25

    Given

    under my hand

    and

    seal

    of off ice

    on th is

    J 1 ~

    NOT RY

    PUBLIC

    THE

    ST TE

    OF

    My

    Commission

    Expires:

    Associated Court

    Reporters

    800-340-5881

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    26/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 107

    1 CAUSE NO. 2013- 44862

    2 WEBSLEUTHS. COM, LLC AND ) I N THE DI STRI CT COURT OF SUSAN PRUI TT, )

    3 PLAI NTI FFS, ) ) HARRI S COUNTY, T E X A S4 VS. )

    )5 PATRI CI A ARRI NGTON GRI FFI TH, )

    DEFENDANTS. ) 157TH J UDI CI AL DI STRI CT6

    7 REPORTER' S CERTI FI CATE

    8 ORAL DEPOSI TI ON

    9 OF10 SUSAN PRUI TT

    11

    12 I , Roxanne K. Smi t h, Cer t i f i ed Shor t hand Repor t er i n

    13 and f or t he St at e of Texas, her eby cer t i f y t o t he

    14 f ol l owi ng:

    15 That t he wi t ness, SUSAN PRUI TT, was dul y sworn and

    16 t hat t he t r anscr i pt of t he deposi t i on i s a t r ue r ecor d

    17 of t he t est i mony gi ven by t he wi t ness;

    18 That t he deposi t i on t r anscr i pt was dul y submi t t ed on

    19 _____ __________ ___ to t he wi t ness or t o t he at t or ney f or

    20 t he wi t ness f or exami nat i on, si gnat ur e, and r et ur n t o me

    21 by ___________________ _____.

    22 That pur suant t o i nf or mat i on gi ven t o t he deposi t i on

    23 of f i cer at t he t i me sai d t est i mony was t aken, t he

    24 f ol l owi ng i ncl udes al l par t i es of r ecor d and t he amount

    25 of t i me used by each par t y at t he t i me of t he

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    27/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Associ at ed Cour t Repor t er s 800- 340- 5881

    Page 108

    1 deposi t i on:

    2 Mr . Wi l l i am Demond ( 2 hour s 46 mi nut es) Mr . Ci r o Samper i ( No Ti me Used)

    3

    4 That a copy of t hi s cer t i f i cat e was ser ved on al l

    5 par t i es shown her ei n on _____________________ .

    6 I f ur t her cer t i f y t hat I am nei t her counsel f or ,

    7 r el at ed t o, nor empl oyed by any of t he par t i es i n t he

    8 act i on i n whi ch t hi s pr oceedi ng was t aken, and f ur t her

    9 t hat I am not f i nanci al l y or ot her wi se i nt er est ed i n t he10 out come of t hi s act i on.

    11 Fur t her cer t i f i cat i on r equi r ement s pur suant t o Rul e

    12 23 of t he Texas Code of Ci vi l Procedur e wi l l be compl i ed

    13 wi t h af t er t hey have occur r ed.

    14 Cer t i f i ed t o by me on t hi s _______day of

    15 _________________, _______.

    16

    17

    18 ____________________________________ Roxanne K. Smi t h, CSR

    19 CSR No. 6290; Expi r es 12- 31- 14 ASSOCI ATED COURT REPORTERS - HOUSTON

    20 Fi r m Regi st r at i on No. 638 5225 Katy Fr eeway, Sui t e 620

    21 Houst on, Texas 77007

    ( 713) 963- 970022

    23

    24

    25

  • 7/27/2019 WEBSLEUTHS.COM, LLC vs Patricia Arrington Griffith

    28/28

    Susan Pr ui t t I J ul y 10, 2014

    Page 109

    1 FURTHER CERTI FI CATI ON UNDER TRCP RULE 203

    2 The or i gi nal deposi t i on was/ was not r et ur ned t o t he

    3 deposi t i on of f i cer on ______________________ .

    4 I f r et ur ned, t he at t ached Changes and Si gnat ur e

    5 page( s) cont ai n( s) any changes and t he r easons t her ef or .

    6 I f r et ur ned, t he or i gi nal deposi t i on was del i ver ed

    7 t o Mr . Wi l l i am Demond, Cust odi al At t or ney.

    8 $_______ i s t he deposi t i on of f i cer ' s char ges t o t he

    9 Pl ai nt i f f s f or pr epar i ng t he or i gi nal deposi t i on and any10 copi es of exhi bi t s;

    11 The deposi t i on was del i ver ed i n accor dance wi t h Rul e

    12 203. 3, and a copy of t he cer t i f i cat e, ser ved on al l

    13 par t i es shown her ei n, was f i l ed wi t h t he Cl er k.

    14 Cer t i f i ed t o by me on t hi s ______ day of

    15 ______________________, ________.

    16

    17

    18 ____________________________________ Roxanne K. Smi t h, CSR

    19 CSR No. 6290; Expi r es 12- 31- 14 ASSOCI ATED COURT REPORTERS - HOUSTON

    20 Fi r m Regi st r at i on No. 638 5225 Katy Fr eeway, Sui t e 620

    21 Houst on, Texas 77007

    ( 713) 963- 970022

    23

    24

    25