Page 1
Paper TitleMEDIATING EFFECT OF WORKPLACE HAPPINESS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED HRM PRACTICES AND RETENTION AMONG CAREER WOMEN
Full name of authors:1. Junaidah Hashim2. Saodah Wok
Organisation affiliation/position(s)1. Professor Datin Dr Junaidah Hashim
International Islamic University Malaysia
2. Professor Dr. Saodah WokInternational Islamic University Malaysia
Address1. Department of Business Administration,
Kulliyyah of Economics & Management Sciences,International Islamic University Malaysia,Jalan Gombak,53100 Kuala Lumpur.
2. Department of Communication,Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge & Human Sciences,International Islamic University Malaysia,Jalan Gombak,53100 Kuala Lumpur.
Email address1. [email protected] 2. [email protected]
StreamNo. 2) Career management and development
Submission typeRefereed papers
Page 2
MEDIATING EFFECT OF WORKPLACE HAPPINESS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED HRM PRACTICES AND RETENTION AMONG CAREER
WOMEN
Structured Abstract (244 words)
Purpose: This study was conducted to find the extent to which HRM practices contributed
towards workplace happiness of working women, which ultimately influences their retention
at workplace.
Design/methodology/approach: This study employed quantitative research design using
survey method. The sample of this study was confined to married/divorced career women in
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The questions regarding perceived HRM practices were adapted
from Huselid (1995), workplace happiness from Albano (2009), and employees’ retention
from Maha and Al-Falasi (1997). All these measures were reliable with Cronbach alpha
values greater than 0.70.
Findings: Perceived HRM practices have strong relationship with career women retention.
Workplace happiness partially mediated the relationship between HRM practices and career
women retention, which was also moderated by family support. The family size (number of
young children) failed to moderate this relationship.
Research limitations: This study focused only on married working women which limits the
generalisation of findings to all working women. This study also did not include single
working women.
Practical implications: Workplace happiness is an important outcome of HRM practices
which does influence employees’ retention. This, to some extent, has been obscured by the
heavy emphasis that has traditionally been placed within the HRM literature on managerially
oriented performance outcomes.
Page 3
Originality: Most of previous studies on workplace happiness primarily focused on Western
work context and not on Asian. Asia provides a very good context because of its multi-racial,
multi-religions, and multi-cultural background. Workplace happiness, thus, may be
interpreted differently with such diverse backgrounds.
Keywords: HRM practices, workplace happiness, retention, working women.
1.0 Introduction
Women form important contributors to a country’s economic and social development.
In Malaysia, as many as 2.3 million Malaysian women are ‘absent’ from the labour market,
leaving the country’s talent pool performing below optimum. One reason for such a situation
could be their difficulty in maintaining a balance between their employment and family
obligations (TalentCorp and ACCA, 2012). For example, married Malaysian women are less
likely to work, especially if they have children that require childcare. The same reason
accounts for many to quit their jobs. Although employee resignation is generally associated
with on-the-job factors such as job dissatisfaction, unjust treatment, employees’ unhappiness
with the job itself, and co-workers or/and supervisors, for female employees there are other
additional factors too.
Many local employers blame the lack of available talent as a key hurdle in realising
companies’ growth. But employers, on the other hand, have not done enough actually, to help
women participate in the workforce. Retaining employees regardless of their gender has
always been perceived as a Human Resource Management (HRM) related matter. There is
evidence to suggest that managerial practices have an impact on employees’ emotions and
performance (Carson, 2005; Legge, 1995; Storey, 1995). The key then appears to lie in
nurturing such a workplace environment in which individuals do not need to worry about
their child’s care, while at the same feeling happy and satisfied. Thus, this study was
Page 4
conducted to know the extent to which HRM practices can contribute to workplace happiness
of working women which consequently influences their retention at jobs.
Although several studies have examined the issue of retaining women, they seemed to
focus mainly on why women leave their jobs (Aminah, 2007; TalentCorp and ACCA, 2012;
UNDP, 2012) and are generally descriptive. Not much has been done on predicting women’s
turnover with respect to HRM practices. Hence, the present study not only examines the
influence of HRM on women retention in an organisation but also extends the existing
knowledge by examining the mediating role of workplace happiness, while at the same time
incorporating family support and family size as moderating variables.
In this specific and important area, this study can be an important reference for future
study. By discovering evidence of how HRM practices make people feel happy may help HR
managers better understand how to create positive and supportive workplace environment. In
fact, this has always been of interest to many HR practitioners. Moreover the findings will
also provide valuable insights to the policy makers, including government, to relook into the
policies affecting working women employment.
2.0 Theoretical Framework
Social Exchange Theory (SET) is among the most influential conceptual paradigms
for understanding workplace behaviour (Cropanzano and Mitchell, 2005). Interactions
between workers and their organisations are reciprocal relationships. SET predicts that the
extent to which these interactions are perceived as reciprocal influences the strength of these
relationships. These interactions are usually seen as interdependent and contingent on the
actions of others (Blau, 1964). This reciprocal relationship is integral to organisational HRM
practices since it involves the exchange of work-related behaviours for rewards that satisfy
the employee's needs. The organisation acts first to provide employees with something of
Page 5
social value such as work-related happiness. The employees, perceiving that the organisation
has worked towards their benefit, feel indebted to reciprocate with something of equal or
greater value, such as being loyal.
Motivational theory also finds relevance in this study. Herzberg (1959) in his two-
factor theory argued that employees are motivated by internal values rather than those values
that are external to their work. In other words, motivation is internally generated and is
propelled by variables that are intrinsic to the work itself, which Herzberg termed
“motivators”. These intrinsic variables include achievement, recognition, the work itself,
responsibility, advancement, and growth. Conversely, certain factors cause dissatisfaction to
employees and are largely related to non-job related variables (extrinsic). Herzberg coined
the term “hygiene factors” for such factors which, although do not motivate employees, must
be present at the workplace to make employees happy. These factors are company policies,
salary, co-worker relationships, and supervisory styles (Bassett-Jones and Lloyd, 2005, p.
929). However, empirical studies (Kinnear and Sutherland, 2001; Maertz and Griffeth, 2004;
Meudell and Rodham, 1998;) have revealed that extrinsic factors such as competitive salary,
good interpersonal relationships, friendly working environment, and job security are cited by
employees as the key motivational variables that influence their retention in the
organisations. This implies that management should not rely only on intrinsic variables to
influence employee retention; rather, a combination of both intrinsic and extrinsic variables
should be considered as an effective retention strategy. It is also obvious here that the
elements in two-factor theory are related to HRM practices.
It is also well-established that women’s employability is hampered especially if they
have young children to look after. But for most parents, low income parents specifically,
work or a job is essential to meet the basic needs of their family. In such a situation,
Page 6
employers that implement family-friendly policies are thought to attract and retain a higher
percentage of employees than those that have not.
In the present context HRM is defined as a set of practices used to manage an
organisational workforce through practices such as staffing, training and development,
performance appraisal, compensation, and employee relations (Beer et al., 1984; Guest, 1989;
Walton, 1985). HRM practices can have different consequences depending on employees’
predispositions. Although employees are largely affected by performance appraisal and
compensation, these are not to undermine the importance of other HRM practices that too
exert their influence on employees.
Not many studies are found in the literature in terms of HRM effect on feelings or
happiness of employees. Most of the limited past studies examined the relationship between
HRM practices and job attitudes such as job satisfaction and commitment (Marescaux et al.,
2013). In the same vein, it should be noted that job satisfaction and workplace happiness are
not synonymous, while workplace happiness can produce job satisfaction. Ford et al. (2003,
p. 23) argued that fun and happiness at workplace go beyond job satisfaction to involve
activities that convey a sense of “pleasantness, happiness, and positive well-being that makes
working not only satisfying but also fun”. In this regard, Baptiste (2008) and Cannibano
(2013) found that innovative HRM practices can lead to both positive and negative well-
being outcomes for the employee. Other studies showed that certain HRM practices, such as
working in teams, greater discretion and autonomy at the workplace, and various employee
involvement and pay schemes do motivate workers and hence generate higher productivity
(Boselie and Van derWiele, 2002; Cully et al., 1999). Similarly, Atkinson and Hall (2011)
studied one HRM practice, flexible working, and found employees’ perception that flexible
working makes them ‘happy’. There were also found attitudinal/behavioural links among the
happiness, discretionary behaviour, and performance outcomes.
Page 7
Workplace happiness has also been studied on its direct effect on organisational
outcomes (Connolly and Viswesvaran, 2000; Grossman, 2000). It is also reported to have
positive effects on a company’s performance (Alexandre et al., 2011; Pryce-Jones and
Lutterbie, 2010) on measures such as increased productivity and higher employee satisfaction
(Connolly and Viswesvaran, 2000; Karl and Peluchette, 2006), organisational citizenship
behaviour (Fluegge, 2008), and reduced employee turnover (Thoresen et al., 2003). Hence it
is hypothesized here that workplace happiness has a mediating effect in the relationship
between perceived HRM practices and employee retention. Simply, employees who
experience happiness at work tend to stay.
Then, workplace happiness, its antecedents, and its consequences may be influenced
by a host of individual factors such as age, gender, and more. The moderating variables tested
in this study are family support and the number of young children. Family support refers to
the extent family members such as spouse, children, and extended family members support
the career women to continue working. In this context, it was found in a study in Britain, the
United Stated, and Japan that married women’s employment is strongly influenced by their
young children. For this reason, the employment rate of married women with infants
(children under one year of age) is about 40 percentage points lower than that of married
women with no children. Hence, based on the literature reviewed the following hypotheses
were formulated:
H1: HRM practices correlate with career women retention.
H2: HRM practices correlate with workplace happiness.
H3: HRM practices influence workplace happiness which in turn influences career women
retention.
H4: There is a moderating effect of family support on the relationship between HRM
practices, workplace happiness, and career women retention.
Page 8
H5: There is moderating effect of family size on the relationship between HRM practices,
workplace happiness, and career women retention.
HRM Practices
Figure 1: Theoretical framework
3.0 Methodology
This study employed quantitative research design using survey method. The sample of
this study was confined to married/divorced career women in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The
context here is crucial because the cost of childcare and the problems associated with career
women in Kuala Lumpur are different from other places in Malaysia.
The population of Kuala Lumpur is more than 100,000. In order to achieve 95%
confidence level the sample had to be 1,200. Stratified random sampling was employed.
Enumerators were sent to pre-identified industries from public, private, and government-link
organisations. This ensured no overlapping among the enumerators. The HR department of
each organisation helped in identifying the respondents for this study.
The questions regarding perceived HRM practices were adapted from Huselid (1995),
workplace happiness from Albano (2009), and employees’ retention from Maha and Al-
Falasi (2014). All these measures were reliable with Cronbach alpha values greater than 0.70.
Staffing Performance
management Compensation Training Employee
relation
Workplace happiness Retention
Family Support Family size
Page 9
4.0 Findings of the Study
4.1 Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents
The respondents of the study are described in terms of age, marital status, years of
marriage, ethnicity, family size composition, level of education, and family support (Table 1).
The respondents are considered young with mean age of 37.7 years (SD=16.5). Almost three-
quarters of the respondents (74.8%) were below 40 years old; the rest (25.2%) were older.
Most of the respondents were married (91.8%) while the remaining were single parent
(8.2%). Only 439 respondents indicated their years of marriage. More than one-third of them
(36.2%) have been married for 1-5 years. Almost 28% have been married between 6-10
years. The rest constituted lesser percentages with increase in number of years of marriage.
Majority of the respondents (91.2%) were Malays, while small proportions were
Chinese (3.9%), Indians (3.4%), and other races (1.6%). Family size composition included
spouse, siblings, parents, and children both above and below 6 years. Surprisingly, even
though most of the respondents were married, they did not stay with their spouses – only half
(51.8%) of the respondents had their spouses staying with them. Many of them (14.4%) had
siblings, parents (26.1%), children above 6 years (42.0%) and children below 6 years
(36.4%).
With respect to education, 40.4% held a basic degree. Some of them (12.1%) went up
to their master’s degree and only few (4.1%) to a PhD degree. In terms of tiers of education,
77.5% had tertiary education, while the rest (22.5%) managed to attend only up to secondary
level.
The respondents did receive family support, especially from their parents (50.5%),
helpers (16.9%), and other relatives (10.3%). There were others too, willing to give family
support to them (20.0%). To summarise, the respondents are young, married, Malay, with
Page 10
varied family size compositions, highly educated, and receiving help from various parties
mainly parents.
4.2 Work-related Characteristics of the Respondents
Table 2 presents the work-related characteristics of the respondents: position, tenure
length with the organisation, income, number of times employer is changed, and number of
times promoted at the job. Results show that almost half of the respondents (48.7%) belonged
to the support staff, though many were also working as executive officers (35.1%) and some
at managerial level (16.2%). Many of them (35.8%) have been working within the past 5
years, while a significant number (30.2%) has been working since 6-10 years. The
descending trend in percentage continues as the number of years at work increases.
In terms of household monthly income, more than half of the respondents (54.1%)
were earning between RM2001-RM5000. Slightly more than one-third of the respondents
received an income of RM5001 and above. Again, these percentages decrease as the income
increases. Almost half of the respondents (48.2%) never changed their employer at all. Many
of them have changed one employer (14.8%), two employers (18.8%), and three employers
(10.6%), but very few changed 4 employers and more. In addition, the study also asked the
number of times the respondents have been promoted. Results show that more than half of the
respondents have never been promoted (55.3%). This proportion decreases as the number of
promotions increases.
4.3 Organisation Characteristics
The study also explored the characteristics of those organisations with which the
respondents worked (Table 3). These characteristics include type of sector, organisation size,
type of industry, and childcare facilities and services rendered to the career women. More
than one-third of the respondents worked in government sector (37.1%), a similar proportion
in government-link companies (36.8%), while 26.2% worked in the private sector. Most of
Page 11
the organisations that they worked for (82.1%) are large companies having 100 and more
employees. The top three industries that the respondents are employed in are education
(26.3%), finance/banking/accounting (19.0%), and for the government (15.3%). Other
industries were sparsely preferred by women in this study. About half of the employers
provided childcare facilities and services for female employees’ children. This was claimed
by 597 respondents (49.8%) with the following breakdown: nursery (21.4%), childcare
facilities (19.9%), and kindergarten (8.4%). It can be said, in conclusion, that the career
women in this study were working in various sectors mainly in government and government-
linked organisations, were employed in large organisations, involved in the education,
finance/ banking/accounting industry, and that their organisations provided childcare
facilities and services for their children.
4.4 Human Resource Practices: Staffing
The staffing items in the human resource practices were found to be reliable
(α=0.818). There was a general agreement of the respondents with all the items (71.7%) with
mean range 3.245-3.953 (Table 4). The item ‘I was formally interviewed by a manager before
being hired for my current job’ was agreed with the highest (79.1%), while the lowest
agreement (64.9%) was with the item ‘I took formal written tests before being hired’. Further,
more than three-quarters of the respondents agreed to the statement ‘I got the job in the
company because I am the right person’ (77.4%) and ‘I was interviewed by more than one
person before being hired at my company’ (77.6%). Others with less than 70% were for items
‘I have been involved in interviewing candidates before they are hired in my company’
(65.6%); ‘I went through a very lengthy interview process’ (67.0%); and ‘It does not take
very long to hire someone at my company’ (67.4%). This implies that the respondents were
hired for their capabilities and that they had undergone formal interviews by many officials of
the organisation.
Page 12
4.5 Human Resource Practices: Training and Development
Training and development aspect of the human resource practices were also found
reliable (α=0.910). Table 5 shows that 73.4% of the respondents agreed with the overall items
for training and development. The means are close to one another, ranging between 3.611-
3.719. The item with highest agreement (74.4%) was ‘I am given an opportunity to improve
my skills at this company through education and training programs’, while the lowest
agreement (72.2%) was with ‘I have the opportunity to be promoted to positions of greater
pay within my company’. This implies that all the items for training and development are
being practiced by their respective organisations.
4.6 Human Resource Practices: Performance Management
The overall performance management dimension of the HRM practices was reliable
(α=0.912), the overall level of agreement with it was 72.2%, and mean ranged from 3.467–
3.715 (Table 6). The item rated highest by the respondents was ‘I received formal evaluation
of my performance annually’ (74.3%), followed by ‘I often agree with my manager on my
performance evaluation’ (73.5%), and ‘I received helpful evaluation and feedback to my
professional development’ (73.2%). The lowest rating was 69.3% received in response to ‘I
have frequent discussions with my manager about my performance’. It shows that the
respondents positively agreed with all the items on human resource practices that involved
performance management of their work.
4.7 Human Resource Practices: Compensation
Compensation items were found to be reliable (α=0.912). The overall level of
agreement with questions related to compensation was 71.0% which is considered positive
(Table 7). All the items received a score 70% and above except for ‘at my company,
Page 13
employees usually get their raises when they expect to get them’ that was rated just below the
others (69.6%). The question ranked highest was ‘at my company, raises and promotions are
tied to performance’ (72.3%). Such practice is imperative to motivate workers, especially
women.
4.8 Human Resource Practices: Employee Relations
Employee relation is an important human resource practices dimension that needs
attention. Just as above, the items for employee relations were also found to be reliable
(α=0.899). Table 8 presents respondents’ perception in response to the seven items measured
under this dimension. Overall, the employee relations were rated positively (70.3%). The
highest ranking item was ‘in my job, I am provided the opportunity to suggest improvements
in the way things are done” (72.5%), followed by ‘my manager keeps open communication
with me in my job’ (72.3%). The lowest ranked item was ‘I am asked to participate in
decisions regarding the selection of new employees’ at 66.9%. This implies that women are
not likely to be involved in decision making process. This inference gets support by low
rating on a similar item ‘I am asked to participate in decisions regarding the training of new
employees’ that received 67.2% favour. Other items were acceptable and positively
perceived, with mean ranging from 3.344-3.623. Generally, it can be said that female
employee relations were being practiced.
4.9 Workplace Happiness
Workplace happiness items were found to be reliable too (α=0.915). The overall level
of agreement with workplace happiness was 75% and is considered to have received positive
evaluation (Table 9). All the items were rated 70% and above. ‘I understand how this
organisation works” was rated the highest (76.9%), followed by ‘I am always learning new
things at work’ (76.4%), and ‘my work means a lot to me (76.3%). The items rated the lowest
Page 14
were ‘I’m not worried about the security of my job’ and ‘my boss helps me get ahead’ with
73.5%. In general, the respondents seemed happy at their workplace.
4.10 Retention
Table 10 shows that overall the items in ‘retention’ dimension were reliable
(α=0.945). In general, the respondents agreed to all the items consistently with mean ranging
between 3.592-3.838. The question receiving most favourable response was ‘I am very
committed to my job’ (76.8%), followed by ‘my organisation deserves my loyalty’ (75.2%).
This is seconded by a high overall percentage score (73.8%) in retention meaning that the
respondents are willing to stay with the present organisation because the organisation is
believed to be a part of them. Their loyalty and commitment together with a sense of
belongingness are assets to the organisation they work for.
4.11 Testing the Hypothesis
H1: HRM practices correlate with career women retention.
All the HRM practices significantly correlated with career women retention.
Generally these relationships were moderately positive: training (r = 0.442, p = 0.000);
performance management (r = 0.443, p = 0.000); compensation (r = 0.511, p = 0.000); and
employee relations (r = 0.457, p = 0.000), except for staffing (r = 0.340, p=0.000) which
showed a weak relationship. Hence, all the variables under HRM practices are fit to be tested
for the mediating and moderating effects with career women retention. In addition, among all
the HRM practices, compensation was found to be the strongest predictor (β = 0.274, t =
7.293, p = 0.000), followed by employee relations (β = 0.151, t = 4.399, p = 0.000), and
training and development (β = 0.137, t = 3.795, p = 0.000).
Therefore, career women retention can be predicted by compensation, employee
relations, and training and development (Table 11 and Table 11.1). All the human resource
Page 15
practices were able to explain for 30.2% towards career women retention. This holds that an
organisation should take into consideration the issues of compensation, employee relations,
and training and development in order to keep women employees loyal to it. Therefore,
hypothesis (H1) is supported.
H2: HRM practices correlate with workplace happiness.
Workplace happiness is an employee’s personal interpretation and response to the
work where she finds the workplace context meaningful to her life. Workplace happiness was
moderately positively associated with staffing (r = 0.411, p = 0.000), training and
development (r = 0.594, p = 0.000), performance and management (r = 0.582, p = 0.000),
compensation (r = 0.590, p = 0.000), and employee relations (r = 0.560, p = 0.000); though
all these relationships were significant (Table 12). The best predictor for workplace happiness
was training and development (β = 0.272, t = 8.639, p = 0.000). All the HRM practices
dimensions were able to explain for 46.7% of workplace happiness (Table 12.1). However,
staffing does not appear to be a predictor for workplace happiness. This makes the equation
for workplace happiness seem like:
1.150 + 0.266 training and development + 0.142 performance and management +
0.168 compensation + 0.150 employee relations.
Therefore, in order for women to perform and be productive to the organisation workplace
happiness must be seriously considered.
H3: HRM practices influence workplace happiness which in turn influences career
women retention.
To test the mediating effects of workplace happiness partial correlation analysis was
carried out with workplace happiness as the controlling factor. Results in Table 13 show that
the relationships of HRM practices dimensions and workplace happiness with career women
retention were found to be significant. These were the preliminary requirements for
Page 16
mediating effect, which were met here. With workplace happiness as a mediating variable all
the relationships between HRM practices dimensions and career women retention were
reduced, though still being significant. This means that workplace happiness is only partially
mediating the relationship between HRM practices and career women retention. Therefore,
hypothesis H3 is partially supported.
H4: There is a moderating effect of family support on the relationship between HRM
practices, workplace happiness, and career women retention
Results (Table 14) show that only two of the HRM practices contributed in explaining
career women retention. They are compensation (F = 29.473, p = 0.000) and human relations
(F = 7.084, p = 0.008). These variables were able to explain for 2.4% and 0.6%, of the
variance respectively. However, the overall model was able to explain 38.4% of the career
women retention variance. In addition, workplace happiness (F = 148.537, p = 0.000) was
able to explain 11.1% of career women retention. Similarly, family support (F = 6.881, p =
0.006) was able to moderate the relationships of compensation, human relations, and
workplace happiness with career women retention, where those with or without family
support were able to retain their career (t = 1.988, p = 0.047). This means that those women
without family support would retain their career more than those with family support (Table
14.1). A reason for this is since they have to work to maintain their family so they have to
send their children to the baby sitters or other childcare facilities. Some did receive these
facilities by their employers.
H5: There is moderating effect of family size on the relationship between HRM practices,
workplace happiness, and career women retention.
Among the HRM practices only compensation (F = 30.247, p= 0.000) and human
relations (F = 5.353, p = 0.021) were able to explain career women retention (Table 15),
while the overall model was able to explain 38.3% of the variance. However, the same
Page 17
dimensions were able to explain only a minimal variation of 0.025% and 0.004%,
respectively. Workplace happiness, on the other hand, was a major contributor to career
women retention (F = 153.385, p = 0.000) since it was able to explain 11.4% of the
dependent variable. The relationship between workplace happiness and career women
retention was rather weak (r = 0.338, p = 0.000) though significant. Since family size was
measured here as having children below 6 years of age (No = 0; Yes = 1), it was not able to
moderate the relationships between HRM practices and workplace happiness with career
women retention. This is despite the fact that there were significant differences (Table 15.1)
between the means of those who do not have children below 6 years (M = 3.730, SD = 0.693)
and those with children above 6 years of age (M = 3.622, SD = 0.642). This means that career
women retention is not affected if they have children below age 6 (t = 2.653, p = 0.000).
Probably it is not the younger children that demand their attention because at that tender age
they need their mothers to be around, to care for them and to give them full attention. Instead,
they should be staying at home, taking care of their children. But when they grow up, so do
their associated expenses; hence it is not only that they can work, but rather they need to
work.
5.0 Discussion and Conclusion
The main findings of the study supported all the hypotheses except one. Perceived
HRM practices have strong relationship with career women retention. Workplace happiness
partially mediated the relationship between HRM practices and career women retention,
which was also moderated by family support. Working women without family support tended
to stay in their employment. The family size (number of young children) failed to moderate
this relationship.
Practically, there are a number of reasons why systematically looking at the impact of
HRM practices on workplace happiness is important. One being that workplace happiness is
Page 18
an important outcome on its own. This, to some extent, has been obscured by the heavy
emphasis that has traditionally been placed within the HRM literature on managerially
oriented performance outcomes. Workplace happiness is an important outcome of HRM
practices which does influence employees’ retention. HR managers should look into the
wellbeing of their employees because by being happy they can excel beyond the
knowledgeable and skilled employees. Skilled employees when feeling disheartened or
unhappy will look for better employers and environment if these feelings continue and are not
taken care of. On the contrary, happy employees will perform better and remain loyal to the
organisation despite getting better offers elsewhere. Employees get a feeling of being
treasured by the organisation if their wellbeing is taken care of. This in turn will make the
employees feel indebted to the organisations and willingly work beyond their personal goals.
Therefore, HR managers should broaden their functions beyond recruitment,
selection, training, and compensation. Workplace happiness can be introduced as a new
dimension for HR managers to focus on. Workforce composition and employee preferences
are changing; given mounting demographic pressures, HR managers must do more than
merely ensuring cost-effective execution of HR processes.
Theoretically, this study builds on existing work within HRM and provides a
framework for establishing the linkage between HRM practices and workplace happiness
among women in a diverse workforce, which suggests enhanced employees retention.
Furthermore, most of previous studies on workplace happiness primarily focused on Western
work context and not on Asian. Asia provides a very good context because of its multi-racial,
multi-religions, and multi-cultural background. Workplace happiness, thus, may be
interpreted differently with such diverse backgrounds.
On the limitations side, this study focused only on married working women which
limits the generalisation of findings to all working women. This study also did not include
Page 19
single working women. Future studies can look into this limitation to carry out a more
comprehensive study which may include single women as well as men. This is to provide
more empirical evidences to make HRM practices more relevant to today’s workforce and
organisational policies.
Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of the RespondentsDemographic Characteristics Category Frequency Percentage
Age (years) 20-25 101 8.426-30 271 22.631-35 283 23.636-40 230 19.241-45 144 12.046-50 87 7.351-60 84 7.0
M=37.7, SD=16.5 Total 1200 100.0Marital status Married 1102 91.8
Single parent 98 8.2Total 1200 100.0
Years of marriage (N=439)1 year – 5 years 159 36.26 years – 10 years 123 28.011 years – 15 years 62 14.116 years – 20 years 40 9.121 years – 25 years 38 8.726 years – 30 years 13 3.031 years and above 4 0.9
Total 439 100.0Ethnicity Malay 1094 91.2
China 47 3.9India 41 3.4Others 18 1.6
Total 1200 100.0Family size (N=1200)
Spouse 622 51.8Siblings 173 14.4Parents 313 26.1Children (more than 6 years old) 503 42.0Children (less than 6 years old) 437 36.4
Total * *Level of education UPSR 6 0.5
PMR 6 0.5SPM/SPVM 184 15.3STPM/Cert 74 6.2Diploma 251 20.9Master 145 12.1Degree 485 40.4PhD 49 4.1
Total 1200 100Family support Helper 202 16.9
Parents 606 50.5Relatives 124 10.3Others 240 20.0
Total * *
Page 20
Table 2: Work-related Characteristics of the Respondents
Characteristics Category Frequency PercentagePosition Managerial 194 16.2
Executive 421 35.1Support Staff 584 48.7
Total 1199 100Duration of working in the organization 5 years and less 430 35.8
6 -10 years 362 30.26 -10 years 167 13.916-20 years 117 9.821-25 years 44 3.726-30 years 43 3.630 years and above 37 3.1
Total 1200 100Household monthly income RM1000 and less 60 5.0
RM1001– RM2000 82 6.8RM2001– RM3000 205 17.1RM3001– RM4000 210 17.5RM4001– RM5000 234 19.5RM5001 and above 408 34.0
Total 1199 100Number of times changed employer(s) 0 578 48.2
1 177 14.82 225 18.83 127 10.64 and more 93 7.8
M=1.226, SD=1.581, Min=0, Max=15 Total 1200 100.0Number of times have been promoted 0 664 55.3
1 241 20.12 170 14.23 72 6.04 26 2.25 and more 27 2.3
M=0.895, SD=1.360, Min=0, Max=11 Total 1200 100.0
Page 21
Table 3: Organisation Characteristics
Characteristics Category Frequency PercentageType of sector Government 445 37.1
Private 314 26.2Government –linked company 441 36.8
Total 1200 100Size of organization (employees) Small (1-10) 107 8.9
Medium (11-100) 108 9.0Large (100 and more) 985 82.1
Total 1200 100Type of industry Education 315 26.3
Finance/Banking/Accounting 228 19.0Government 184 15.3Utilities/Oil & Gas/Electricity/Water
90 7.5
Medical/Health Services 67 5.6Manufacturing 65 5.4Consumer products/Retail/wholesale
52 4.3
Information Communication Technology (ICT)
50 4.2
Insurance 29 2.4Consulting 27 2.3Engineering/Architecture 24 2.0Legal 12 1.0Industrial Technology 11 0.9Real Estate 9 0.8Training 8 0.7Travel/Hotel/Hospitality 7 0.6Contractors/Construction 6 0.5Entertainment 5 0.4Biotechnology/Biomedical 4 0.3Food & Beverages 4 0.3Advertising 1 0.1Transportation 1 0.1Laundry service 1 0.1Military 0 0
Total 1200 100The types of facilities and services rendered.
Nursery 257 21.4
Childcare allowance 239 19.9Kindergarten 101 8.4
Total (N=1200) 597 49.8
Page 22
Table 4: Level of Agreement on Staffing
A. Staffing Level of Agreement* (%) M SD %1 2 3 4 5
1. I was formally interviewed by a manager before being hired for my current job.
2.3 3.7 20.6 43.6 29.9 3.953 0.923 79.1
2. I have been involved in interviewing candidates before they are hired in my company.
12.9 10.1 27.3 35.3 14.4 3.282 1.212 65.6
3. I got the job in the company because I am the right person.
1.2 2.3 26.1 49.3 21.2 3.869 0.809 77.4
4. I was interviewed by more than one person before being hired at my company.
2.3 4.8 23.0 42.0 27.8 3.882 0.948 77.6
5. I went through a very lengthy interview process.
3.1 8.7 36.3 39.3 12.8 3.499 0.930 67.0
6. At my company, I was being screened for problem solving skills.
2.3 6.9 33.3 42.8 14.6 3.604 0.900 72.1
7. I have undergone a structured interview before being hired.
3.6 8.3 32.4 41.8 13.9 3.541 0.953 70.8
8. I took formal written tests before being hired.
9.8 12.9 32.6 32.6 12.2 3.245 1.128 64.9
9. It does not take very long to hire someone at my company.
4.0 11.2 38.9 35.6 10.3 3.371 0.951 67.4
Overall staffing (α=.818) 3.583 0.625 71.7*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (80-100%)
Table 5: Level of Agreement on Training and Development
C. Training & Development Level of Agreement*(%) M SD %1 2 3 4 5
1. I have the opportunity to be promoted to positions of greater pay within my company.
2.2 6.2 34.3 43.1 14.3 3.611 0.881 72.2
2. I have clear paths for moving up in the company.
1.5 4.7 35.2 46.7 12.0 3.630 0.811 72.6
3. My career aspirations are considered by my immediate supervisors.
1.2 4.8 36.8 45.3 11.9 3.620 0.801 72.4
4. In the positions that I have held with my company, I have often been given additional challenging assignments.
1.1 4.9 31.4 49.3 13.3 3.688 0.802 73.8
5. In the positions that I have held with my company, I have often been assigned projects that enabled me to develop and strengthen new skills.
1.3 4.2 32.1 48.9 13.6 3.694 0.802 73.9
6. I am given an opportunity to improve my skills at this company through education and training programs.
0.8 3.7 32.2 49.4 13.9 3.719 0.777 74.4
7. I am satisfied with the number of training and development programs available to me at my company.
1.3 6.0 33.8 46.3 12.5 3.627 0.827 72.5
8. I am satisfied with the quality of training and development programs available to me at my company.
1.3 6.3 32.8 46.6 13.2 3.642 0.833 72.8
9. I have received training and educational activities at my company
1.3 4.5 31.5 48.3 14.4 3.702 0.814 74.0
Page 23
that have enabled me to perform my job more effectively.
10. I learned how to do my job simply by doing it.
0.8 4.3 27.3 52.8 14.9 3.768 0.779 75.4
Overall training and development (α=.910)
3.670 0.605 73.4
*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (80-100%)
Table 6: Level of Agreement on Performance Management
E. Performance Management Level of Agreement*(%) M SD %1 2 3 4 5
1. I received formal evaluation of my performance annually.
2.3 5.1 30.5 43.3 18.9 3.715 0.905 74.3
2. I received helpful evaluation and feedback to my professional development.
1.4 5.2 32.6 47.6 13.3 3.661 0.823 73.2
3. If I do my job well, I am likely to be promoted.
1.9 4.6 38.1 41.9 13.5 3.605 0.846 72.1
4. During my performance appraisal session, I have ample opportunity to express my side of a performance issue.
1.6 6.3 37.9 43.0 11.2 3.558 0.832 71.2
5. I have frequent discussions with my manager about my performance.
1.7 7.8 42.4 38.3 9.8 3.467 0.837 69.3
6. I often agree with my manager on my performance evaluation.
1.6 5.9 37.3 45.5 9.7 3.558 0.809 71.2
7. I understand what my performance will be based on.
0.9 4.0 33.7 49.6 11.8 3.674 0.769 73.5
8. I am involved in setting objectives for my job.
1.4 5.2 33.8 47.6 12.1 3.638 0.813 72.8
9. My pay raises in this job are based on my job performance.
2.5 6.2 31.5 45.9 13.9 3.626 0.887 72.5
Overall performance management (α=.912)
3.611 0.633 72.2
*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (81-100%)
Table 7: Level of Agreement on Compensation
G. Compensation Level of Agreement*(%) M SD %1 2 3 4 5
1. Generally I feel my company rewards me for my extra effort.
1.9 6.6 35.8 41.5 14.2 3.594 0.879 71.9
2. I am satisfied with the amount of recognition I received when I do a good job.
2.1 7.3 36.0 41.3 13.3 3.566 0.885 71.3
3. My pay is tied to my performance. 2.5 6.5 39.3 41.2 10.6 3.508 0.862 70.2
4. At my company, raises and promotions are tied to performance.
1.8 5.3 35.2 44.9 12.8 3.614 0.842 72.3
5. At my company, employees usually get their raises when they expect to get them.
2.3 8.2 40.5 37.8 11.3 3.478 0.880 69.6
6. At my company, employees always get their raises on time.
1.4 7.9 38.7 39.9 12.1 3.533 0.857 70.7
7. I feel my wages are competitive. 1.6 6.3 39.3 41.3 11.7 3.552 0.837 71.0
Overall compensation (α=.912) 3.549 0.699 71.0
Page 24
*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (81-100%)
Table 8: Level of Agreement on Employee Relations
I. Employee Relations Level of Agreement*(%) M SD %1 2 3 4 5
1. In my job, I am allowed to make many decisions.
2.0 8.3 36.2 38.1 15.4 3.566 0.917 71.3
2. In my job, I am often asked by my supervisor to participate in decision makings.
1.7 6.0 36.8 43.8 11.8 3.580 0.836 71.6
3. In my job, I am provided the opportunity to suggest improvements in the way things are done.
1.3 5.3 34.6 47.5 11.3 3.623 0.804 72.5
4. My manager keeps open communication with me in my job.
1.2 5.4 35.3 46.8 11.3 3.616 0.800 72.3
5. I am asked to participate in decisions regarding the selection of new employees.
6.3 10.6 35.8 37.3 10.1 3.344 1.007 66.9
6. I am asked to participate in decisions regarding the training of new employees.
5.0 11.1 36.8 37.3 9.9 3.360 0.975 67.2
Overall employee relations (α=.899) 3.515 0.729 70.3*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (81-100%)
Table 9: Level of Agreement on Workplace Happiness
Workplace Happiness Level of Agreement*(%) M SD %1 2 3 4 5
1. I’m not worried about the security of my job.
2.3 6.1 29.0 47.1 15.5 3.673 0.890 73.5
2. I can count on my co-workers to support me in hard times.
1.2 4.8 31.2 49.2 13.8 3.696 0.808 73.9
3. I know what is expected for me at work. 0.5 1.9 28.2 55.5 13.9 3.804 0.710 76.1
4. My work means a lot to me. 0.5 2.1 30.0 50.3 17.2 3.815 0.752 76.3
5. I understand how this organization works. 0.4 2.1 27.5 52.5 17.5 3.846 0.740 76.9
6. I have enough authority to do what I need to do.
1.3 4.3 33.1 47.7 13.7 3.681 0.810 73.6
7. I am always learning new things at work. 0.4 2.9 27.8 52.1 16.8 3.818 0.753 76.4
8. I receive clear and consistent guidance for my work.
0.8 3.7 30.1 51.4 14.0 3.741 0.772 74.8
9. My boss helps me get ahead. 2.0 4.5 30.5 50.2 12.8 3.673 0.829 73.5
10. I find my work personally satisfying. 1.1 3.3 29.8 51.5 14.3 3.745 0.779 74.9
Overall workplace happiness (α=.915) 3.749 0.591 75.0
Page 25
*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (81-100%)
Table 10: Level of Agreement on RetentionRetention Level of Agreement*(%) M SD %
1 2 3 4 51. My organization deserves my loyalty. 0.9 3.5 31.8 46.3 17.5 3.760 0.811 75.2
2. I would not leave my organisation right now because I have a sense of obligation to my company.
1.2 4.8 31.3 46.7 16.2 3.720 0.831 74.4
3. I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with my organization.
1.8 6.0 36.8 41.0 14.4 3.602 0.871 72.0
4. I am very committed to my job. 0.4 2.0 30.3 47.8 19.4 3.838 0.768 76.8
5. I feel a strong sense of “belongings” to my organization.
0.7 3.4 34.3 44.2 17.4 3.743 0.805 74.9
6. Even if it were to my advantage, I do not feel it is right to leave my organization.
1.3 5.3 34.3 43.4 15.8 3.673 0.847 73.5
7. It is my obligation to remain with my current employer.
1.7 4.8 35.6 43.3 14.6 3.643 0.848 72.9
8. I feel “emotionally attached” to this department.
1.5 5.8 36.4 41.8 14.5 3.619 0.856 72.4
9. I feel like “part of the family” in my department.
0.9 3.8 33.8 45.1 16.4 3.723 0.813 74.5
10. I would stay working at my company regardless of what.
2.1 6.1 38.2 37.9 15.8 3.592 0.897 71.8
Overall retention (α=.945) 3.691 0.677 73.8
*1-strongly disagree (1-20%), 2-disagree (21-40%), 3-neutral (41-60%), 4-agree (61-80%), 5-strongly agree (81-100%)
Table 11: Career women retention and HRM practices Variable (N=1200)
Mean SD Retention Staff Training Performance Compensation
Retention 3.691 0.677 1
Staffing 3.583 0.625 r=.340 1p=.000
Training 3.670 0.605 r=.442 r=.583 1p=.000 p=.000
Performance 3.611 0.633 r=.443 r=.497 r=.664 1p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Compensation 3.549 0.699 r=.511 r=.488 r=.608 r=.687 1p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Employee 3.515 0.729 r=.457 r=.448 r=.553 r=.618 r=.666p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Table 11.1: Simple multiple regression showing career women retention and HRM practices Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t p
B Std. Error Beta(Constant) 1.360 .114 11.92
7.000
Staffing .035 .033 .032 1.044 .296
Page 26
Training .153 .040 .137 3.795 .000Performance .058 .040 .054 1.442 .150Compensation .266 .036 .274 7.293 .000Employee Relations
.140 .032 .151 4.399 .000
F=104.598, df=5, 1194, p=.000, R=.552, R²=.305, Adj. R²=.302
Table 12: Workplace happiness and HRM practices
Variable (N=1200)
Mean SD Workplace Happiness
Staff Training Performance Compensation
Workplace 3.749 0.591 1
Staffing 3.583 0.625 r=.411 1p=.000
Training 3.670 0.605 r=.594 r=.583 1p=.000 p=.000
Performance 3.611 0.633 r=.582 r=.497 r=.664 1p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Compensation 3.549 0.699 r=.590 r=.488 r=.608 r=.687 1p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Employee 3.515 0.729 r=.560 r=.448 r=.553 r=.618 r=.666p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Table 12.1: Simple Multiple regression showing HRM practices with workplace happiness
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t pB Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 1.150 .087 13.216
.000
Staffing -.003 .025 -.003 -.123 .902Training .266 .031 .272 8.639 .000Performance .142 .031 .152 4.617 .000Compensation .168 .028 .199 6.050 .000Employee Relations
.150 .024 .184 6.151 .000
F=211.223, df=5, 1194, p=.000, R=.685, R²=.469, Adj. R²=.467
Page 27
Table 13: Mediating effect of workplace happiness on HRM practices dimensions and
women retention
Controlling Variable
Variable (N=1200)
Retention
Staffing Training Performance
Compensation
Employee Relations
None Retention 1
Staffing r=.340 1p=.000
Training r=.442 r=.583 1p=.000 p=.000
Performance r=.443 r=.497 r=.664 1p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Compensation
r=.511 r=.488 r=.608 r=.687 1
p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000Employee r=.457 r=.448 r=.553 r=.618 r=.666 1
p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000Workplace happiness
r=.578 r=.411 r=.594 r=.582 r=.590 r=.560
p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000Workplace Happiness
Retention 1
Staffing r=.138 1p=.000
Training r=.150 r=.463 1p=.000 p=.000
Performance r=.161 r=.348 r=.487 1p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Compensation
r=.258 r=.333 r=.397 r=.523 1
p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000Employee r=.198 r=.289 r=.330 r=.433 r=.502 1
p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000 p=.000
Page 28
Table 14: Univariate analysis of variance showing the moderating effect of family support on the relationship between HR practices, work happiness with career retention
Source Type III sum of squares df Mean square F p Eta squareCorrected model 212.963a 7 30.423 107.891 .000 .388Intercept 16.543 1 16.543 58.667 .000 .047HR staffing .529 1 .529 1.877 .171 .002HR training .235 1 .235 .835 .361 .001HR performance .008 1 .008 .027 .869 .000HR compensation 8.311 1 8.311 29.473 .000 .024HR relations 1.998 1 1.998 7.084 .008 .006Happiness 41.885 1 41.885 148.537 .000 .111Family support 1.940 1 1.940 6.881 .009 .006Error 336.123 1192 .282Total 16898.740 1200Corrected total 549.086 1199
a. R square= .388, Adjusted R square=.384
Table 14.1: Independent sample t-test showing differences between family support and career women retention
Family support N Mean SD t p
No 166 3.788 .710 1.988 .047
Yes 1034 3.676 .670
28
Page 29
Table 15: Univariate analysis of variance showing the moderating effect of family size on the relationship between HR practices, work happiness with career retention
Source Type III sum of squares df Mean square F p Eta squareCorrected model 211.923a 7 30.275 107.025 .000 .386Intercept 15.505 1 15.505 54.813 .000 .044HR staffing .353 1 .353 1.247 .264 .001HR training .300 1 .300 1.060 .304 .001HR performance .009 1 .009 .031 .860 .000HR compensation 8.556 1 8.556 30.247 .000 .025HR relations 1.514 1 1.514 5.353 .021 .004Happiness 43.389 1 43.389 153.385 .000 .114Family size .750 1 .750 2.650 .104 .002Error 336.905 1191 .283Total 15881.100 1199Corrected total 548.827 1198
a. R square= .386, Adjusted R square=.383
Table 15.1: Independent sample t-test showing differences between family size and career women retention
Family size N Mean SD t p
No 762 3.730 .693 2.653 .008
Yes 437 3.622 .642
REFERENCES
Albano, Jr. J., 2009. Developing a measure and an understanding of the individual experience of happiness at work. PhD thesis, Proquest UMI, Vol. 3371929.
Alexandre Momparler, Pedro Carmona and Francisco Climent, 2011. Happiness at work. Maximizing your psychological capital for success. Management Decision, 49(6), pp.1028 – 1032.
Aminah, A., 2007. Family-friendly employment policy practices in the Malaysian government and selected private organizations. The Journal of Global Business Management, 3, pp. 128-135.
Atkinson, C., and Hall, L., 2011. Flexible working and happiness in the national health service. Employee Relations, 33(2), [online] Available at: < www.emeraldinsight.com/0142-5455.html > [Accessed 12 October 2014].
Baptiste, N. R., 2008. Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance: a new dimension for HRM. Management Decision, 46 (2), pp. 284-309.
Bassett-Jones, N., and Lloyd, G. C., 2005. Does Herzberg's motivation theory have staying power?. Journal of Management Development, 24(10), pp. 929 – 943.
29
Page 30
Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Quin Mills, D. and Walton, R., 1984. Human Resource Management: A General Manager's Perspective, Illinois: Free Press.
Blau, P. M., 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Boselie, P., and Van der Wiele, T., 2002. Employees perception of HRM and TQM, and the effects on satisfaction and intention to leave. Managing Service Quality, 12(3), pp. 165-172.
Cannibano, A., 2013. Implementing innovative HRM: trade-off effects on employee well-being. Management Decision, 51(3), pp. 643-660.
Carson, C.M., 2005. A historical view of Douglas McGregor’s theory Y. Management Decision, 43(3), pp. 450-460.
Connolly, J. J., and Viswesvaran, C., 2000. The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, pp. 265-281.
Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M., 2005. Social exchange theory: an Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), pp. 874-900. DOI: 10.1177/0149206305279602.
Cully, M., Woodland, S., O‟Reilly, A., and Dix, G., 1999. Britain at Work: As Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, London: Routledge.
Fluegge, E. R., 2008. Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance. PhD thesis, Proquest UMI, Vol. 3322919.
Ford, R. C., McLaughlin, F. S., and Newstrom, J. W. 2003. Questions and answers about fun at work. Human Resource Planning, 26(4), pp. 18-33.
Grossman, R. J., 2000. Emotions at work. Health Forum Journal, 43(5), pp. 18-22.
Guest, D., 1989. Personnel and HRM: can you tell the difference?. Personnel Management, 21(1), pp. 48-51.
Herzberg, F., 1959. The Motivation to Work, New York: Wiley.
Huselid, M. A., 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3), pp. 635-672.
Maha Ibrahim , Saoud Al Falasi , 2014. Employee loyalty and engagement in UAE public sector. Employee Relations, 36(5), pp. 562 – 582.
Karl, K. and Peluchette, J. , 2006. How does workplace fun impact employee perceptions of customer service quality?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(2), p. 2.
Kinnear, L., and Sutherland, M., 2001. Money is fine, but what is the bottom –line?. Journal of the South African Institute of People Management, 19(1), pp. 15-18.
30
Page 31
Legge, K., 1995. Human Resource Management: Rhetoric's and Realities, London: Macmillan.
Maertz C. P., and Griffeth, R.W., 2004. Eight motivational forces & voluntary turnover: a theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), pp. 667-683.
Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., and Sels, L., 2013. HR practices and HRM outcomes: the role of basic need satisfaction. Personnel Review, 42(1), pp. 4-27.
Meudell, K., and Rodham, K., 1998. Money isn’t everything…or is it? A preliminary research study into money as a motivator in the licensed house sector. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality, 10(4), pp. 128-132.
National Policies and Programmes to increase and retain the participation of women in the Malaysian labour workforce. UNDP 2012 available at www. undp .org/.../ undp /.../ Women %20Participation%20in%20Labour %20Workforce.pdf, accessed on 2 September 2014.
Pryce-Jones, J. and Lutterbie, S., 2010. Why leveraging the science of happiness at work matters: the happy and productive employee. Assessment & Development Matters, 2 (4), pp. 6-8.
Storey, J., 1995. Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, London: Routledge.
TalentCorp and ACCA Report, 2012. Retaining Women in the Workforce. [online] Available at:< /www.talentcorp.com.my/wp-content/themes/agenda/ACCA%20MaSRA%202013_TSNMY%20speech%20FINAL.pdf > [ accessed on 2 September 2014].
Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., and de Chermont, K., 2003. The affective underpinning of job perceptions and attitudes: a meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 129, pp. 914-945.
Walton, R., 1985. From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 64(5), pp. 12-16.
31