Ho1
Bruce Ngoun Ho
English 114B
Professor Collins
19 February, 2015
Compare & Contrast of Ozymandias, Rorshach, Dr.
Manhattan
In “Watchman” by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, there are many
similarities and differences between Ozymandias, Rorshach, and Dr.
Manhattan. The three heroes are very powerful both physically and
mentally, but have different ideas about justice and to what extent
this justice may be taken to so that it is achieved. They do feel
that society is corrupt, that the world is corrupt, but they do not
share the same philosophies. In Tunisia, Tunisians start a
rebellion and demand the resignation of the interim government
(they were ruled by a dictator). In succeeding, most of the
civilians that rebelled were educated middle classmen who knew
nothing of the lower, poor classes. During elections, the middle
classmen lost to a democratic candidate who understood very well
how it felt to be in the poor part of the pyramid. What started off
as a rebellion for the middle classmen to live better lives in a
better community resulted in the election of a candidate that they
did not fully support. Ozymandias and Dr. Manhattan may disagree
with this outcome, but Rorshach may have some reasons in supporting
this election. Ozymandias, Rorshach, and Dr. Manhattan are similar
in some ways, but different in many.
When a hero “serves” justice, he, or she, is acting to apply
fairness to whomever deserves it. In many cases, justice is
“served” to those who act wrongly. For example, a man kills a woman
for her belongings and is chased down by a masked vigilante. The
masked vigilante then batters the villain and turns him into the
police. The vigilante has “served” justice. Rorschach believes in
justice, but his “justice” is more extreme. Rorschach acts in a way
that is, “do wrong and wrong shall be done to you” sort of way.
This means that Rorshach’s justice would result in murdering the
one who has murdered. Ozymandias’s justice is all for the greater
good. When he was a masked vigilante, he took down villains and
goons to keep others safe, but as he matured and learned of the
corrupted world, he tried to create a better future. His “justice”
told him to save the world and resulted in the killing of millions
of lives across the globe. The resulting end may not have justified
Ozymandias’s means. In saving the world, he consequentially rid
people from living actual lives, literally. Dr Manhattan differs
greatly from the other two. Ozymandias and Rorshach had a sense of
justice. I believe that Dr. Manhattan has no sense of the sort. He
is so intelligent and so powerful that he often loses himself in
his own work. Although it is true that Dr. Manhattan
single-handedly ended a war, he only did fought because the
government requested him to. Towards the end of the book, Dr.
Manhattan did kill Rorshach of his own volition, but it was only to
logically support was Ozymandias was trying to do. The resulting
end of Dr. Manhattan killing Rorshach may have met its means.
Rorschach was already corrupt and was going to cause mayhem by
adding to the occurring panic.
The philosophies of the three heros are probably what separates
them the most. Rorschach’s philosophy is objectivism. He believes
in understanding reality and that he must accept the world for what
it has become, no matter how corrupt. In a way, coming to
understand reality through perception is what corrupted Rorschach
himself. Instead of accepting the world for what it has become,
Ozymandias’s decided to take matters into his own hands and cleanse
the world himself. In order to create world peace and save it from
destroying itself, he had decided to take the lives of millions.
Dr. Manhattan goes through great philosophical changes throughout
the book. At first, he only cared about humanity because his only
attachment to it was Laurie Juspecyk. After losing her, he lost
interest in humanity and ran to Mars, but later regains interest
through observation and introspection. After Ozymandias rids the
lives of millions, Dr. Manhattan comes to the conclusion that human
life is a precious phenomenon and even states that he may create
human life of his own one day. In saying this, it is unsure whether
he means that he’ll give birth to a single child, or to an entire
civilization.
In 2011, Tunisians succeeded in overthrowing the dictatorship.
Most of the Tunisians that rebelled were educated middle classmen.
After the rebellion was over, it was time for the Tunisians to
elect a face for the country. The middle classmen who though they
had everything all figured out ended up failing the elections
because they did not fully understand the situation that the poor
classmen were undergoing. The Tunisians overthrew the interim
government, but consequentially could not govern themselves.
Ozymandias fits into this country’s problem perfectly. However,
since Tunisia could not govern itself, they decided to debate
through elections. Ozymandias, instead of getting a new leader for
the country, chose to cleanse the population instead. Had Rorshach
been thrown into this case, I believe he might have just
assassinated the dictator or pick out all the bugs deep within the
government. Well, maybe not the bugs deep within, but most likely
those that would cause a public disturbance. With Rorshach, any
corrupted leader can be elected and he would just accept the
occurrence as the reality in which he lives. Dr Manhattan may
understand the corrupt government, but would not intervene. When
the new leader of the state was to be chosen, he would allow
himself to be used as any useful resource. Such as becoming an
iconic figure for the country, becoming a military weapon, or even
the countries head of nuclear science.
Ozymandias, Rorshach, and Dr. Manhattan are all very powerful
heroes. They similarly believe that the world is corrupt, but do
not believe on the actions that can be taken towards this problem.
Ozymandias and Dr. Manhattan feel that this problem can be fixed,
but Rorshach came to the conclusion that it is the world he lives
in. It is simply reality for him. Although some of them believe in
a justice, their actions may not meet their means. Ozymandias,
Rorshach, and Dr. Manhattan are indeed similar in some ways, but
their differences greatly outweighs the similarities.