Top Banner
Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005
26

Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

Myron Blair
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Web Content Management Update

University of Louisville

April 12, 2005

Page 2: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Content Management Systems

Content management systems are used to systematically create, organize, publish, manage and maintain web-based information and resources.

Page 3: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Content Management at UofL

Content Types Software

Academic Resources Blackboard

ULink Portal and PeopleSoft Self-service

PeopleSoft Portal

Document Imaging and Archiving

OnBase

Document collaboration and sharing

DocuShare

Departmental web creation and maintenance

???

Page 4: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

UofL Departmental web sites

Inconsistent in look and feel Navigation changes from page to page Content often out of date Variable quality of content Content difficult and labor intensive to maintain Web pages not designed to be handicapped

accessible

Page 5: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Goal

1. Provide tools, resources and support for departmental web creation and maintenance that will: Simplify creation and maintenance of web sites Ensure a consistent look and feel Provide for handicapped accessibility Enable maintenance by causal web users Support editorial processes (content approval and

scheduling workflow)

Page 6: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Content Management System Features

Page templates Create consistent look and feel across a set of pages Maintain navigation across site Build in accessibility Use web standards

Structured data entry Create and maintain content without use of HTML Ease maintenance for non-technical content owners

Workflow process Allows for approval from editor before publishing Scheduling of content can automate removal

Page 7: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

CMS features (continued)

Separation of content from presentation Allows reuse of content with telephones,

handhelds, and other devices Provide built-in applications types

Mail forms Departmental calendar of events Departmental news Photo Gallery Advanced search

Page 8: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Process

Organize CMS Team Interview CMS users and stakeholders Examine technical requirements Develop strategy and evaluation criteria Survey available software Implement pilot project Develop recommendation Review with advisory groups

Page 9: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Criteria

System Capabilities (required) Compatible with proposed Linux environment Load Balancing and Scalability Supports LDAP authentication Distributed administration Granular (role-based) privileges

Page 10: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Criteria (continued)

Product Features (required) Accessibility Support (section 508 and WAI) Flexible and fully customizable templates Capability to assign different look and feel by unit Content approval workflow Ability for casual users to maintain content

Page 11: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Criteria (continued)

Product Features (required) SSL compatible Unlimited license for servers, users, and URLs Ability to interoperate seamlessly with other UofL

web environments, portal, etc. Availability of commercial support

Page 12: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Criteria (continued)

Product Features (desired) Content Scheduling Human readable and publishable URLs Version control Advanced Search capabilities Support web standards (XHTML and CSS) Undo

Page 13: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Criteria (continued)

Product Features (desired) Automatic generation of navigation Through-the-web editing Online help Available training Content syndication Wide user base Inexpensive to deploy

Page 14: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Evaluation Criteria (continued)

Built-in Applications Mail form Departmental calendar of events Departmental News Photo Gallery Search Engine Site map Survey/polls Forum

Page 15: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Popular CMS Products

ContextXML Uses XML with XSLT to store and deliver content. Focus on content re-use. Commercial $100K+ licensing

Documentum Focus on massive sites for storage and publications of internal corporate information.

Commercial $500K+ licensing

Drupal PHP based small to mid-size CMS.

Open Source licensing

eZpublish PHP based small to mid-size CMS.

Open Source licensing

IBM CMS (Websphere) Large scale CMS. integrates with Lotus Notes, DB2, and Websphere applications server.

Commercial $250K+

Page 16: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Popular CMS Products (cont’d)

Interwoven Large scale system focusing on versioning, workflow, and templating.

Commercial $400K+

Mambo Focus on corporate web sites, PHP based CMS.

Open source licensing

Midgard Popular Australian-based enterprise content management framework (tool set).

Open source licensing

Microsoft CMS Enterprise CMS based on Microsoft web server, sharepoint, and .NET technology. Commercial $100K+ licensing

OmniUpdate ASP updating server for web sites. Commercial per-user licensing model.

Page 17: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Popular CMS Products (cont’d)

Plone Flexible enterprise content management system based on Zope’s content management framework. Open source licensing.

RedDot Enterprise content management system with a sophisticated editing capability. Commercial $150K+ licensing

SiteRefresh Flexible Java based web publishing toolkit. Commercial $25K+ licensing

Typo3 Popular European-based open source CMS.

Open source licensing

WebGUI Modular object-oriented “application framework” for content management. Open source licensing.

Page 18: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Results of Product Survey

Very wide variety of options and approaches

Options range from individual blogging software to comprehensive enterprise application systems

CMS products are often dependent on additional vendor product sets such as Lotus Notes, Microsoft Sharepoint server, etc.

Page 19: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Results of Survey (continued)

Commercial options Expensive and proprietary Primarily targeted at business, e-commerce sites

Open source options Good fit with existing network and server

environment (Linux, apache) Open, flexible and customizable Good fit with departmental publishing needs

Page 20: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Top Candidate

Plone CMS Open source Highly customizable Support for large enterprise departments Enable rapid implementation Maintenance by casual users Wide user base Commercial support available

Page 21: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Plone Characteristics

Compatible with UofL environment Cross-platform support: Linux, Windows,

Sun, Apple, BSD Support for LDAP authentication Ability to distribute administration and

privileges Content scheduling and approval Ability to import/export websites

Page 22: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Plone Characteristics (continued)

Standard templates validate to web standards (XHTML and CSS)

Standard templates implement accessibility standards (WAI and 508)

Supports load balancing and scalability Existing experience Commercial support

Page 23: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Plone Characteristics (continued)

A sample of Plone users include: Duke University North Carolina State UNC, Chapel Hill Rice University, Houston Loyola University, Chicago NASA Mars rover - http://mars.telascience.org/home Sigma Xi, research Society - http://exchange.sigmaxi.org/

Page 24: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Implementation Considerations

Establish production environment and LDAP connection

Identify technical support staff (1/2 FTE) Develop user support staff (1/2 FTE) Additional Helpdesk resources Develop documentation and training Develop sample templates Develop custom support offerings

Page 25: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Summary A content management system can help University

departments develop consistent web sites, meet accessibility standards, ease maintenance of content by casual users, and implement editorial processes to maintain content quality.

The Plone CMS is currently the top candidate. Implementation will require:

Integration with enterprise infrastructure, including LDAP Technical support staff (1/2 FTE estimated) End user support and training (1/2 FTE estimated) Additional HelpDesk resources

Page 26: Web Content Management Update University of Louisville April 12, 2005.

Discussion

This presentation is located at http://docushare.louisville.edu/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-8560/

Mike Dyre

[email protected]

852-7770