Web-based Class Project on Ground Improvement

Web-based Class Project

on Ground Improvement

Report prepared as part of course CEE 542: Soil and Site Improvement

Winter 2014 SemesterInstructor: Professor Dimitrios Zekkos

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Michigan

VibroflotationPrepared by:

Yanet Zepeda Ian McCreery

With the Support of:

Vibroflotation

Ian McCreery & Yanet Zepedahttp://www.cyes.es/images/obras/69/imagenes/max/00105%20AMPLIACION%20DARSENA%20SUR%20PTO%20VLC%201.JPG

Overview❏ Introduction❏ Applicability❏ Equipment & Construction❏ Design❏ Cost❏ Case Study: Success❏ Case Study: Failure

IntroductionVibroflotation utilizes horizontal vibrations in conjunction with

fluid to reduce the interparticle friction of the surrounding soil.

http://www.polbud-pomorze.ru/en/vibroflotation/

IntroductionDuring vibration material falls into a denser state.Result: Increase in strength and a reduction in compressibility.

Densification of soil during vibroflotation (Bauer Maschinen GmbH, 2012)

IntroductionUses:❏ Reduce potential settlement❏ Seismic liquefaction mitigation

Common for:❏ Off-shore projects❏ Land made of reclaimed soil❏ Hydraulic fills

ApplicabilityMost coarse-grained soils with a fines content of less than 10%

are considered acceptable.

Ideally, loose soils below the water table.

ApplicabilityProblem with Cohesive Soils:Fills voids between larger particles and immobilizes the material

due to positive pore water pressures; this inhibits the ability of the granules to move into a denser state.

http://www.vibromenard.co.uk/techniques/vibro-compaction/

Applicability

The orange area represents the grain size distribution of soils suitable for vibroflotation (Bauer Maschinen GmbH, 2012)

Equipment❏ Composed of vibroflot and follow-up pipe❏ Capabilities vary by manufacturer❏ About 12 feet in total length❏ Weigh about 10,000 to 20,000 lbs

Equipment❏ Electric or hydraulically powered motor to

rotate a mass❏ Centrifugal force generated: 43,000 to

70,000 lbs❏ 2 Jets

❏ Bottom❏ Upper

http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/240334132/VFA200_Hydraulic_Vibroflot.jpg

Construction Procedures❏ Reach depths up to 150 feet❏ Densification achieved 5 to 15 radially from vibroflot

Construction Procedures❏ VF trial❏ Soil penetration❏ Densification at desired

depth❏ Retract probe to next

location❏ Backfill

Construction Procedures❏ Vibroflot Starving❏ Quality Control

❏ Penetration Depth❏ Penetration Rate❏ Withdrawal Rate❏ Probe Location❏ Power Peak❏ Operating Frequency❏ Post-Operation Density Checks

DesignDensity goal set in terms of relative density

Spacing Patterns: Square, Triangular, Line

CostHighly Variable

Croton Dam Case Study (1999)

Cost

Case Study: SuccessSeabird Naval Base at Karwar in

Indian state of Karnataka.

Construction of 3 mile long breakwater structure.

Project Seabird (Sharma, 2004)

Case Study: SuccessExisting seabed was composed of clay and soft silt, it was

dredged to a depth of nearly 20 feet with hydraulic sand fill.

Problem:CPT’s revealed need for compaction of top 13 feet to reduce

settlement and mitigate liquefaction

Case Study: Success35 acres selected for compactionFour 49 foot long vibrators suspended from a crane situated on a

barge

Project Seabird setup (Raju et al., 2003)

Case Study: SuccessResults & Conclusion:CPTs performed every 164 feet along the breakwater structure.

The 13 feet of compacted fill achieved a twofold to threefold increase in penetration resistance compared to the uncompacted values.

Vibro flotation densified the hydraulic fill beneath the breakwater structure successfully.

Case Study: FailureThermalito Afterbay in Northern

California

8 mile long embankment, 39 foot height

Case Study: FailureAugust of 1975 an earthquake of magnitude 5.7 revealed an

active fault that had not been previously detected.

Department of Water Resources evaluated the embankments resistance to liquefaction under a 6.5 magnitude earthquake.

Case Study: FailureAnalysis predicted that the silty sand layers in the foundation of

the embankment would liquefy entirely under these seismic conditions.

Densification of these silty sand layers was necessary to mitigate liquefaction risks.

Case Study: FailureFoundation made of layers of different soils including clay, silt,

sand and gravel.

Surface layer throughout most of the embankment was composed of a clay and silt layer several feet thick.

Silty sand layers contain a median of 15 percent fines, with 30 percent of the samples containing more than 20 percent fines

Case Study: FailureVibroflotation testing

program implemented

Thermalito Bay worksites table (Harder et. al., 1984)

Case Study: FailureVibroflot was not used to penetrate the clay and silt surface

layer, here pre-drilling was used until silty sand layer reached then holes were backfilled before vibroflot was inserted.

An equilateral triangular spacing scheme was utilized with spacings ranging from 6.5 feet to 9.5 feet.

Case Study: FailureResults for Worksite 2.

No appreciable improvement.

Same for Worksite 1.

Thermalito Bay CPT and SPT results (Harder et. al., 1984)

Case Study: FailureConclusion:Vibroflotation is not an effective method for the densification of

silty sands below a cohesive soil cap.

The failure of vibroflotation as a technique in this case is most likely due to the relatively high fines content of 15 percent in the silty sand layer.

ConclusionsVibroflotation is a successful and cost effective technique used to densify

loose coarse-grained soils

Questions

More InformationMore detailed technical information on this project can be found at:

http://www.geoengineer.org/education/web-based-class-projects/select-topics-in-ground-improvement