Top Banner
Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom
29

Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

Vanna

Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom. Web 2.0 Tools in a Social Studies Classroom. Google Earth Bubble.us Facebook Twitter Prezi Google Groups. Google Earth. 3-D mapping and geographical visualization program Available as a downloaded client or through the Web - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Page 2: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Web 2.0 Tools in a Social Studies Classroom

▪ Google Earth▪ Bubble.us▪ Facebook▪ Twitter▪ Prezi▪ Google Groups

Page 3: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Google Earth

▪ 3-D mapping and geographical visualization program

▪ Available as a downloaded client or through the Web

▪ Allows user to add their own information

▪ Free

Page 4: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Why use Google Earth?

▪ American students, as a group, score poorly on world geography assessments (Schachter, 2012)

▪ Geography is more than labelling countries and capitals (Yundt, 2013)

▪ Brings context to discussions, aiding in both retention and engagement (Taylor & Plewe, 2006)

▪ Commonly used, already a lot of lesson plans available using Google Earth

Page 5: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

How is Google Earth used?

▪ Answer research questions▪ Instructional purposes▪ Not just geography– History– Anthropology– Sociology– Civics/Political Science– Anything where places add

context

Page 6: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Google Earth Wrap-up

▪ Brings worldwide mapping and satellite imagery into the classroom

▪ Supports Searching by address, Lat Long, or place name

▪ Has information in addition to maps– geo-located photos– 3-D building maps– Ability to add own information

Page 7: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Bubble.us

▪ Comprehensive and flexible mind-mapping system

▪ Available online▪ Can share maps with

others, both read-only and editable

▪ Free

Page 8: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Why Use Bubbl.us?

▪ The use of mind-mapping helps reinforce learning and future information retrieval (Wheeldon, 2011)

▪ Allows learners to visualize their knowledge, providing both practice and context in creation and retrieval

▪ Simple and easy to use

Page 9: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

How is Bubble.us used?

▪ Use it as a study-aid by both teachers and students– Give visual representation of information– Gives practice in information retrieval

▪ Use it as an assessment tool– Formative – to ensure that students are

gaining the information adequately– Summative – to ensure that content is

retained

(Making A Map : Mind Map Rubric, 2007)

Page 10: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Bubble.us Conclusion

▪ Create a central theme to the information to be shared

▪ Create related sub themes and display the relationship visually

▪ Share the output as desired

Page 11: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Facebook

▪ Social networking site, consisting of a personal representation (profile), social connections, and other items (applications)

▪ Most students will likely already be on the system

▪ Allows group sites as well as personal sites

▪ Free

Page 12: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Why use Facebook?

▪ As a communications tool between teacher and students

▪ As a community building tool

▪ Connects some of the student’s favorite informal learning experiences with the more formal learning experiences in school (Fewkes & McCabe, 2012)

Page 13: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

How is Facebook used

▪ Used primarily as a group communications tool

▪ Secondary usage could include assessment where an individual or group maintained user page is evaluated for content

Page 14: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Facebook Summary

▪ Allows users (students and teachers) to share information with each other and build a community.

▪ Allows the ability to create posts

▪ Allows the ability to ask/answer questions

Page 15: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Twitter

▪ An online social networking and microblogging service

▪ Sends messages no more than 140 characters

▪ Viewable online or through free apps

▪ Users both send “tweets” and subscribe to read “tweets” from other users

▪ Free

Page 16: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Why Use Twitter?

▪ Active notification - users subscribe to notifications, so users (students in this case) will be notified as soon as the teacher posts a tweet.

▪ Properly formatted questions (using hashtags - #something) can be answered by subject matter experts

▪ Ability to interact with people world-wide

Page 17: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

How is Twitter used?

▪ Twitter is used more as a learning tool than for assessment– Get tweeted information from

experts– Ask questions to anyone in the

twitterverse, classified by hashtag

▪ Use as a messaging platform between teachers and students

Page 18: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Twitter wrap-up?

▪ A user can be followed, which means their tweets will be immediately delivered

▪ Following gives user the ability to watch for tweets from others

▪ Hashtags (#something) allow for the grouping of information, lets multiple people tweet about the same thing.

Page 19: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Prezi

▪ Online presentation software

▪ Video and audio can be imported and included in the presentation

▪ Can act like a giant chalkboard for creativity, not like a traditional slide presentation program

▪ Free for limited usage

Page 20: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Why use Prezi?

▪ Online access to creating and viewing presentations

▪ Many different types of templates to give a start in creating an effective presentation

▪ Allows excellent, template control of the look and feel of a presentation

Page 21: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

How is Prezi used?

▪ Can be used by an instructor to present information to the students

▪ Can be used by students to present information back to the class and/or instructor– Formative assessment – Summative assessment /

Research or project write-up

Page 22: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Prezi Conclusion

▪ Creation is linear, like a “traditional” presentation program

▪ Display is all slides together on one screen

▪ Play feature moves the screen around, user can edit the flow of the screen as it moves around

Page 23: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Google Groups

▪ Acts as a community, either open or closed (by invitation only)

▪ Discussion Forum – allows students and teacher to have synchronous communication

▪ Mailing List – create one email and easily send it to the group

▪ Free

Page 24: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Why use Google Groups?

▪ Discussion forums build a sense of community and enhance learning in an online course (Misanchuk & Anderson, 2001).

▪ Supports both both active and passive learners (Nandi, Hamilton, & Harland, 2012)

▪ Available online and through various apps

Page 25: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

How are Google Groups used?

▪ Email list supports communications between teacher and students

▪ Can be used as a learning tool by posting and discussing content

▪ Supports formative assessments through posting requirements and follow-through discussion

Page 26: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Google Groups Summary

▪ Discussion forums allow instructors to lead learning

▪ Forums also allow students to reply to instructors and interact with each other

▪ Integrated with the Google infrastructure

Page 27: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Conclusion

▪ There are, literally, hundreds of Web 2.0 tools available for instructors.

▪ Some tools are designed to support communications▪ Other tools support presentation▪ Many tools do a little bit of everything▪ Tools should not be looked at as always providing

information from instructor to students – they can be used as assessment tools where students create information for evaluation from the instructor

Page 28: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

References

▪ Fewkes, A. M., & McCabe, M. (2012). Facebook: Learning tool or distraction. Journal of digital learning in teacher education, 28(3), 92-98. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ972449

▪ Making A Map : Mind Map Rubric. (2007, Aug 30). Retrieved from Rubistar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=ShowRubric&rubric_id=1095617&

▪ Misanchuk, M., & Anderson, T. (2001). Building Community in an online learning environment: Communication, cooperation and collaboration. Proceedings of the Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, (p. 22). Murfreesboro, TN. Retrieved from http://www.mtsu.edu/-itconf/proceed01/19.pdf

▪ Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012, May). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5-30.

Page 29: Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

References (cont.)

▪ Schachter, R. (2012, June). Geography ed for a flat world. District Administration, 48(6), 28-33.

▪ Taylor, W., & Plewe, B. (2006). The effectiveness of Interactive maps in secondary historical geography education. Cartographic Perspectives, 55(Fall), 16-33.

▪ Wheeldon, J. (2011). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Using mind maps to facilitate participant recall in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 509-522.

▪ Yundt, H. (2013, Apr). Lost on a map. Canadian Geographic, 133(2), 6.