Page 1
1
We saw last time how our ‘keeping’ of time began in the skies –
from the daily whirl of the stars around us, to the motion of the
all-important Sun through the heavens as the year goes by,…
…punctuated by the ever-
changing, yet ever-returning
Moon.
The ease with which these
cyclic phenomena could be
observed – and their utility
in managing time – enabled
the growth and spread of
astronomy-based calendars
very early in human
cultures throughout the
ancient world.
Page 2
2
These calendars imprinted – literally – a cycle on the otherwise
unknown and uncertain future. Their ties to commonly visible
phenomena helped them spread widely, allowing for the
expansion of agriculture, trade, and communication between
widely separated groups across the ancient world.
Perhaps most significantly, increasingly accurate
timekeeping stimulated the growth of religion and science, as
humans moved from simply noting the time, to asking why
the heavens moved in cycles at all – though their answers
might seem odd by modern standards!
Page 3
3
Evidence suggests
these patterns were first
placed in the context of
a physical model of the
universe by the early
Greek culture, most
notably Aristotle (~350
BC). By 200 AD, this
had been refined by the
mathematician Ptolemy
into what would later
be called the
“geocentric model” of
the universe.
This model (also referred
to as the “Ptolemaic
model”) was built upon
the foundation of
Aristotelian physics –
four elements, with the
heavy and base Earth
resting firmly at its
center while the spheres
of the stars, planets, and
Sun (made of some
heavenly 5th element)
whirled around us.
Page 4
4
As Greek culture spread
over the centuries, this
model was widely
accepted. It was easy to
understand, and the
apparent central focus of
the heavens on the Earth
reinforced the importance
of humanity. The planets
and stars seemed clearly
attentive to us, monitoring
and shaping the destinies
of the central and unique
Earth.
Do you recognize any of these
ancient figures? All of them?
Why is that?
These wheels of time and
their repeating cycles
played a significant role in
many historical cultures,
reinforcing myths of
recurrence and rebirth in
the cosmos, as well as the
reliability of established
order – “the King is dead,
long live the King!” – and
the futility of change.
Page 5
5
“Unto the place from whence the rivers came, thither
shall they return again… The thing that hath been, it
is that which shall be; and that which is done is that
which shall be done…”
- Ecclesiastes 1:5-9
“It is indifferent to me where I am to begin, for there
shall I return again.”
- Parmenides, ca. 500BC
However, while the Earth-centered model of Ptolemy and
Aristotle seemed to explain so much, so simply, it was notoriously
clumsy in explaining the phenomenon of retrograde motion, a
complicated ‘loop’ that planets appear to make in the sky.
Page 6
6
Jupiter and Saturn – seen here dancing back-and-forth amongst the stars
over a roughly one-year period between June 2000 and May 2001.
This non-uniformity in the
apparent motion of planets
was modeled in the
geocentric system through
the addition of “epicycles”
to the orbit of each planet –
so that planets orbited in a
funny spiraling sort of way
around the Earth. Epicycles showing Retrograde Motion
Page 7
7
A ‘simpler’ model of the
Solar System – the
“heliocentric model”,
introduced as early as
290 BC by the Greek
astronomer Aristarchus –
explained this retrograde
motion, along with all of
the other apparent
motions of the stars and
planets, by imagining the
Earth itself in orbit
around the Sun.
To preview/remind you –
this is really how it works!
But such a world view
demanded that the
Earth move through
space – which certainly
doesn’t feel like it’s
happening, and would
suggest some bizarre
possibilities! Ptolemy
himself considered the
absurdity of the Earth’s
motion to be “obvious”.
Page 8
8
Nevertheless, by the middle
of the 16th century the
Ptolemaic model – and
indeed, the entire
Aristotelian world view –
was in crisis. Spurred by
increasingly accurate
observations of the planets,
Renaissance astronomers
had been forced to add
more and more epicycles to
the model in order to match
what the planets and stars
appeared to be doing. A clock in Strasbourg, Germany, showing
one of the great technological advancements
of the 15th Century – the minute hand!
In the early 1500’s, Nicholaus
Copernicus, a Polish cleric
and astronomer, began to look
for a way to return simplicity
and uniformity to the heavens.
In 1543, he published De
Revolutionibus Orbium
Caelestium (“Concerning the
Revolutions of the Heavenly
Spheres”), and in it revived
and put math to Aristarchus’
ancient idea of a Sun-centered
solar system.
Nicolaus Copernicus, 1473-1543
Page 9
9
But Copernicus’s model was
no better than the Ptolemaic
model at predicting the
motions of the planets,
required a moving Earth, and
soon met strong resistance
from the Catholic church at
the time. Partly because of
this, the new “heliocentric”
model of Copernicus was not
widely accepted.
Illustration of Tycho Brahe’s
observatory at Uraniborg.
However, Copernicus’s work
had convinced many young
intellectuals, including
Galileo Galilei. As a young
scholar he had begun
overturning Aristotelian
physics, showing that objects
in motion, instead of coming
naturally to rest, tend to stay
in motion – which suggested
that plants and animals would
not necessarily fall off of a
moving Earth. Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Page 10
10
But Galileo’s most
significant
contributions
began in 1609
when he turned a
new invention –
the “telescope” –
up to the skies and
found mountains
and valleys on the
supposedly perfect,
made-of-magic-5th-
element Moon…
…as well as four tiny worlds
orbiting around the planet Jupiter,
which proved that the Earth was not
the center of all orbits in the sky!
Page 11
11
These observations by Galileo, along with work by many
others, soon completely overturned the old universe of Aristotle
and Ptolemy. By 1650 most of the informed intellectuals of the
western world had shifted from believing the geocentric model
to accepting the motion of the Earth through space.
And that’s despite the fact that those motions are very fast and
very, very real – from the rotation of the Earth on its axis…
Page 12
12
…to its revolution around the Sun at over 100,000 km/hr!
In the 20th century this
would be expanded
even further – the
whole solar system
moves under the
gravitational influence
of the of our entire
galaxy. This collective
force drives the Solar
System in a “Galactic
orbit” at speeds near
1,000,000 km/hr!
Page 13
13
And there’s more – our entire galaxy is being gravitationally
pulled towards other members of our Local Group,
such as M31 – the Andromeda Galaxy…
…at speeds of almost
300,000 km/hr!
Think for a moment about
what this really means – even
in the quietest moments, you
and every single thing around
you is in a frenzy of motion at
over 300 miles per second.
Do you sense this motion?
Intuitively, we feel we ‘move
on’ in time, but that the spaces
around us – our homes, our
classrooms – do not move.
But this is untrue!
Page 14
14
In fact we and everything around us are all zooming
along through the great stream of our realities, never
experiencing the same time OR space twice – one cannot
move through time without moving through space.
We’ll return to this connection between space and time later when
we explore general relativity – for now, I would note what this
change in our view of the Earth’s motion did to our view of time.
For many scientists, philosophers, and artists our constant motion
into ever-new locations in the universe made it clear that old ideas
of Earth’s constancy and the soothing cycle of time were false.
Page 15
15
Many bold new ideas emerged in the 300 years following
Galileo’s work, including modern views on geology and
biology, but also the general conceit and wide-spread
acceptance of progressivism – the idea that we can shape the
future in a positive way and avoid repeating events of the past.
Far more than ever in
human history, we had
adopted the directional
arrow as our dominant
metaphor for time – a
historical development
that persists to this day.
While retro chic is
always fun*, it’s what’s
new that really drives
our modern cultures!
*Okay – “always fun” at Halloween parties!