WAYNE M c MILLAN MArch II, Hon. B.A., Dipl. Arch . W W address: 165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205 Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2L4 mobile: 647.389.5153 email: [email protected]
Mar 24, 2016
W A Y N E M c M I L L A NMArch I I , Hon. B.A., Dipl. Arch.
W
W
address:165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2L4
mobile:647.389.5153
email:[email protected]
OBJECT IVE
To secure a summer internship in an innovative, engaging environment that challenges the limits ofmyabilities,andencouragesthedevelopmentofnewskillsformutualbenefit.
EDUCAT ION
Master of Architecture Candidate University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sept. 2012 - Dec. 2015 Hon. Bachelor of Arts with High Distinction Architectural Design Major, Urban Studies Minor, Visual Studies Minor University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sept. 2007 - Apr. 2011
Architectural Technology Diploma with Honours Northern Alberta Institute of Technology Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Sept. 2003 - Apr. 2005
WORK EXPER IENCE
Junior Designer / Architectural Technologist Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic Bengert 10315- 109 St. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada July 2011-August 2012; October 2005 - July 2007; Summers 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013.
+ Contributed as part of a collaborative design team to the schematic and design development processes onmid-tohigh-densityresidential,commercial/retail,office,andcommunityrecreationcenterprojects. +Correspondeddirectlywithclientsandconsultantstocoordinateandrefineproject-specificdesign strategies and maximize project momentum. + Utilized Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign in the preparation of competition proposals and municipal project presentation documents. + Developed AutoCAD drawings according to the requirements of design and presentation, development permit, tender, and construction documents.
Teaching Assistant John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, University of Toronto 230 College Street,Toronto, Ontario, Canada January - April 2014
+ Responsible for the administration of course assignments and examinations, reviewing and evaluating student work, and meeting with students to discuss issues of academic development and grading
W A Y N E M c M I L L A NMArch I I , Hon. B.A., Dipl. Arch.
W
W
address:165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2L4
mobile:647.389.5153
email:[email protected]
softwareproficiencies:
AutoCADRhino 5.0V-Ray for Rhino3ds MaxSketchUp Adobe PhotoshopAdobe IllustratorAdobe InDesignMicrosoftOfficeSuite
professional skills:
Proven LeadershipCreative Problem SolvingEffective CollaboratorArticulate Communicator
CO-CURR ICULAR EXPER IENCE
Innis Residence Don Hiring Panel Member Innis Residence, University of Toronto 2010, 2011
+ Reviewed Residence Don application packages, conducted interviews, and assisted in the selection of successful applicants. Innis College Council Member Innis College, University of Toronto 2009 - 2010
+ Represented the interests and concerns of the Innis College student community in planning and policy- making agendas relating to Academic, College, Community, and Student affairs. + Served as a member of the College Affairs Board contributing to decisions concerning College facilities and services. + Contributed as a member of the Student Affairs Board to the resolution of issues relating to the student experience at Innis College. + Directed the schematic design of the Innis College Quad Improvement Plan as a member of the Innis Green Design Committee
Parkdale Elementary After School Tutor St. Christopher House Jan.-Apr. 2010
+ Provided one-on-one assistance to help students develop their learning skills by encouraging them to complete assignments independently, by creating challenges, and by asking questions that test their understanding.
Orientation Week Team Captain Innis College, University of Toronto 2008, 2009
+Actedasaliaisonbetweencoordinators,leadersandfirstyearstudents. + Ensured the coordination and safety of a group of approximately 60 students and leaders. +Resolvedandmediatedinterpersonalconflictsandlogisticalcomplications.
SCHOLARSH IPS AND AWARDS
+ Received the Adrian DiCastri Graduate Student Endowment Fund for excellence in design (2013). + Received the Eberhard Zeidler Scholarship for academic achievement in design (2013). + Awarded an Ontario Graduate Scholarship for academic excellence in graduate studies (2013). + Granted an admissions scholarship to the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design Master of Architecture program (2012). + Awarded the Larry Wayne Richards Admissions Fellowship for UofT Architectural Studies Graduates (2012). + Received the Wasser Leadership Scholarship (2011) in recognition of sustained leadership contributions over several years, and academic excellence. + Awarded the Innis College Exceptional Achievement Award (2008, 2009, 2010) for superior academic achievement. + Received the Later Life Learning OSOTF Award (2008, 2009, 2010) for superior academic achievement. + Received the Taddle Creek Residence Life Award (2008-2009) for residence community involvement and demonstrated leadership abilities.
D U F F E R I N R E D U X
University of TorontoMaster of Architecture ProgramArchitectural Design Studio II _ Superstudio
Studio Advisor:Drew Adams
Timeline:September - December, 2013
In this project, a 275,000 m2 site comprised of an existing mall and community park served as a testing ground for how inherited ideas about architecture, landscape architecture and urban design could be reconceived and reconfigured toaccommodate an urban density nearly twice the City of Toronto average.
Within the existing residential fabric, the Dufferin Mall acts as an obstacle to east-west traffic, creating several dead-endstreets and awkward interstitial spaces where loading docks and bicycle paths share the same space. Dufferin Park, by contrast, is one of the most well-used and well-loved parks I have ever visited, offering a wide range of programs and amenities that reveal an active and engaged community. There is a distinct binary condition between both sides of Dufferin Street, so my objective in this project was to introduce a more porous block structure to the Dufferin Mall site, and to amplify and extend the domain of Dufferin Park, creating a more integrated venue for the social functions of the Dufferin Grove Community.
Due to the scale of the Dufferin Mall site, this project also offered the opportunity to leverage the City of Toronto’s recent green roof bylaw requirement, and to imagine a terraced network of landscaped roofs that serve as an extension of the publicly accessible park space. The redevelopment proposal incorporates a mix ofretail,residential,commercialoffice,andcommunity/institutional programs to create and advocate for a richer and more diverse form of urban life than what currently exists in the Dufferin Grove neighbourhood.
UPPER FLOORS
FOURTH FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
GROUND FLOOR
PEDESTRIAN STREETS:-seasonal farmers’ market venue-seasonal retail space-street performers’ festivals-craft fairs
EXPANDED PARK SPACE:-firepits-skating rink-splash park-athleticfields-basketball court-picnic sites-dog park
PUBLIC ROOFSCAPE:- urban gardening educational centre- food share pavilion- community garden expansion- orchards- test crop / hardy vegetable gardens- herb / microgreens gardens- chicken coops / apiaries
SEMI-PUBLIC ROOFSCAPE:
- resident allotment gardens-seasonalflowergardens- commercial plant nursery- public greenhouses- seed exchange- orchards
PRIVATE RESIDENT ROOFSCAPE:
- resident allotment gardens- native species preserve- leisure park- extensive green roof
DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE
MUIR AVENUE
COBOURG AVENUE
“CHESLEY AVENUE PROMENADE”
01
“ARCHER STREET PROMENADE”
NEW BROCKTON SCHOOL
COMMUNITY LIBRARY
RECREATION CENTRE
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRE
PLAYGROUND
AFTER SCHOOL CARE
DAYCARE
COLLEGE STREET
LINDSEY AVENUE
LINDSEY AVENUE
SYLVAN AVENUE
CROATIA STREET
BLOOR STREET
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
BRO
CK
ST
REE
T
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
DU
FFER
IN S
TR
EET
BRO
CK
ST
REE
T
DU
FFER
IN S
TR
EET
GLA
DST
ON
E AV
ENU
EG
LAD
STO
NE
AVEN
UE
HAV
ELO
CK
ST
REE
TH
AVEL
OC
K S
TR
EET
DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE
01 02
02
03
04
03
04
STREET HIERARCHYIMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATIONPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS
DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE
MUIR AVENUE
BLOOR STREET
CROATIA STREET
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
DU
FFER
IN S
TREE
T
BRO
CK
STR
EET
PRIMARY STREETS
SHARED WOONERFS
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADES
LANEWAYS
STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITYSTREET HIERARCHYIMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATIONPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS
DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE
MUIR AVENUE
BLOOR STREET
CROATIA STREET
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
DU
FFER
IN S
TREE
T
BRO
CK
STR
EET
PRIMARY STREETS
SHARED WOONERFS
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADES
LANEWAYS
STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITYSTREET HIERARCHYIMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATIONPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS
DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE
MUIR AVENUE
BLOOR STREET
CROATIA STREET
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
DU
FFER
IN S
TREE
T
BRO
CK
STR
EET
PRIMARY STREETS
SHARED WOONERFS
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADES
LANEWAYS
STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITYSTREET HIERARCHYIMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATIONPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS
DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE
MUIR AVENUE
BLOOR STREET
CROATIA STREET
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE
SHER
IDA
N A
VEN
UE
DU
FFER
IN S
TREE
T
BRO
CK
STR
EET
PRIMARY STREETS
SHARED WOONERFS
PEDESTRIAN PROMENADES
LANEWAYS
STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITYPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS IMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATION STREET HIERARCHY STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITY
▲ Overall Site Redevelopment Plan
▲ S i t e Axonomet r i c
▼ Transve r se S i t e Sec t i on
BR
OC
K S
TREE
T
SH
ERID
AN
STR
EET
WO
ON
ERF
STR
EET
▲ Pedes t r i an S t ree t Pe r spec t i ve
WO
ON
ERF
STR
EET
SH
ERID
AN
STR
EET
DU
FFER
IN S
TREE
T
S I T E C O N T E X T P L A NSCALE 1:1000
N
S I T E P L A N SCALE 1:100
N
N
A
D D
A
M A I N F L O O R P L A N
L E G E N D
DR
OP
-O
FF
A
RE
A
01
01 Relaxat ion Room 02 Kitchen Area 03 Welcome / Si t t ing Area 04 Mechanica l Room
05 Storage Room 06 Director’s O�ce 07 Fundrai ser’s O�ce08 Indiv idual Counse l ing Room
09 Washroom 10 Quiet Room 11 Group Counse l ing Room 12 Garden Area
03
05
06 07 11
12
11
04
02
08
09
09
09
10
SCALE 1: 50
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
AV
EN
UE
MU
RR
AY
ST
RE
ET
MCC
AU
L S
TR
EE
T
HE
NR
Y S
TR
EE
T
B A L D W I N S T R E E T
O R D E S T R E E T
BE
VE
RL
EY
ST
RE
ET
RO
SS
ST
RE
ET
B
B
C
C
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
M A G G I E ’ S C A N C E R C A R E C E N T R E TO R O N TO
University of TorontoMaster of Architecture ProgramArchitectural Design Studio I
Studio Advisor:Francesco Martire
Timeline:January - April, 2013
Proposed as a satellite location for the Maggie’s Cancer Caring Centres founded in the U.K., this project encouraged students to develop an architecture that recognizes the institution as both an extension of the city and as a social space that confronts the unique challenge of helping people to cope with the pain and uncertainty that can follow a cancer diagnosis.
The guiding principle of the Maggie’s Centre insists that people may choose to participate in any of their programs, or none of them, as a way of reinforcing that there are no better or worse ways of dealing with cancer. As such, the building was designed to offer its users a calm, friendly space where each individual can decide what strategy they want to adopt to support their medical treatment and their overall welfare. They will be able, if they so wish, to have a private conversation with the program director or the clinical psychologist about their particular situation, or participate in a range of free programs, including group support, family and friends support, relaxation sessions, information accessandbenefitsadvice.
Regardless of how patrons choose to engage with the Toronto Maggie’s Centre, the program spaces are organized around an open, social space that invites visitors to integrate themselves within a supportive community of individuals, families and friends dealing with cancer.
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT
INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT
ENTRY
ENTRYENTRY
SOCIALSPACE CHOICE
ENT
RA
NC
E
WEL
CO
ME
/ SIT
TIN
G /
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
OFF
ICE
SPA
CE
VID
EO /
CO
MPU
TER
AR
EA
KIT
CH
EN
REL
AX
ATIO
N R
OO
M
GRO
UP
CO
UN
SELI
NG
IND
IVID
UA
L C
OU
NSE
LIN
G
LAVA
TOR
IES
QU
IET
SPA
CE
MEC
HA
NIC
AL
/ ELE
CT
RIC
AL
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
REL
AX
ATIO
N P
ROG
RA
MS
INFO
RM
ATIO
N S
ERV
ICES
SUPP
ORT
SER
VIC
ES
PUBL
IC F
AC
E TO
PA
RK
PRIV
ATE
FAC
E TO
HO
SPIT
AL
EXTROVERTEDSPACES
INTROVERTEDSPACES
MIS
CEL
LAN
EOU
S
EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE
MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
REL
AX
ATIO
N
INFO
RM
ATIO
N
SUPP
ORT
PARKENTRY
DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY
PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL
TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS
ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED
INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC
01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT
02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT
S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06
A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10
P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09
P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03
S I T E A N A LY S I S01
M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05
O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02
EIGG SMA
N AT U R A L L I G H T07
C I R C U L AT I O N08
01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION
SUM
MER
SO
LSTI
CE
WINTER SOLSTICE
VIEW TO SKYLINE
▲ Nigh t Rende r i ng
P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s
0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length
T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s
0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length
T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s
0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length
T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s
0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length
T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s
0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length
T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s
0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length
T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”
F O L D / P A V I L I O N
University of TorontoMaster of Architecture ProgramArchitectural Design Studio I
Studio Advisor:Robert Levit
Timeline:September - December, 2012
columnconfiguration
delete extraneous surface
fold pattern generation
surfaceboundarydefinition
offset curve
minimize span length
This project asked students to design a multi-level pavilion exploring the structural properties of folded plate structures. Considering that the spanning form was to be supported by as few columns as possible, I approached the assignment by reverse-engineering the geometry of the folded spanning structure according to the locations of the column arrangement. According to this logic, the intersections of the valley folds in each bay of the folded slab structure occur above each column to ensure that the load of the slab is directed to the columns that support it. Curvature is introduced to the column configurationin order to improve the lateral stability of the pavilion, and to mitigate the overturning action that would otherwise occur in an alignedcolumnconfiguration.
▼ Ground-level Perspective Rendering
5.1
9A5.1
13
A5.2
25
A5.1
2
A5.1
11
A5.2
23
A5.2
19
A5.2
17
A5.2
16
A5.2
20
A1.7
2
A5.1
1
A5.1
3
A5.1
4
A5.2
15
A5.2
18
A5.2
22
A5.2
14
A1.7
2
A5.1
8A5.1
6
A5.1
10
A5.2
21
A5.2
24
A5.4
48
A5.4
51
OPPOSITE
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
UPDN
UP 3R
UP
DN
LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE. TYPICAL.
2% SLOPE
RAMP UP @ 0.5%
RAM
P D
N @
6%
LINE OF MEZZANINE ABOVE
LINE OF PARKADE WALL BELOW
FD
UP 2R
UP 2R
UP 4R
UP 4R
UP 2R
UP 2R
UP 1R
GAS LINE TO MECHANICAL
ROOM
8" C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL TO 8"
ABOVE MAIN FLOOR SLAB
FURR OUT WALL AT MECHANICAL LOCATIONS. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS
6" Ø BOLLARD
6" Ø BOLLARDS
LINE OF SOFFIT ABOVE
CONTINUOUS 6" CHANNEL BUMPER REFER TO DETAIL 22/A4.2
RAM
P D
N @
15
%
8" Ø BOLLARDS BOLTED TO STRUCTURAL SLAB
HEAVY DUTY GRATE. SEE
DETAIL 66/A4.7
PROVIDE 2 1/2" STEEL STUD FRAMING W/ 1/2" GYPSUM WALLBOARD TO U/S OF SECOND FLOOR SLAB
SIAMESE CONNECTION. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.
LINE OF DOOR TRACK ABOVE. TYPICAL.
LINE OF DOOR TRACK ABOVE.
TYPICAL.
LINE OF MEZZANINE ABOVE. SEE A1.1a FOR COMPRESSOR LAYOUT AND EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS.
CONTINUOUS 6" CHANNEL BUMPER
REFER TO DETAIL 22/A4.2
UP 20 R
PROVIDE STEEL HANDRAIL. TYPICAL TO ALL STAIR LOCATIONS.
PROVIDE 3" RIGID INSULATION AND AIR/VAPOUR BARRIER TO EXTERIOR FACE
LIFT PUMP PLATFORM
REFER TO A6.1 FOR WINDOW
ELEVATIONS
8" CONCRETE CURB BELOW
WINDOW SILL
EXTENT OF 6" CONCRETE BLOCK TO
UPPER WALL.
6" VENT DUCT THRU SLAB INTO PARKADE. MOUNT GRILLE AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE
PROVIDE ELEVATOR SHAFT
ONLY. NO CAB.
CONCRETE BLOCK WALL ON 10"
CONCRETE UPSTAND @ ELEV. 100'-8".
HATCH INDICATES EXTENT OF LIFT PIT
DUCTDUCT
BELOW
6" PRESSURIZATION DUCT C/W P12 SURROUNDING WALLS TO U/S OF SECOND FLOOR SLAB - TYPICAL
7/8" FURRING CHANNEL C/W 1/2" GYPSUM TO COVER
CONCRETE WALL REFER TO DETAIL 85/ A4.9 LINE OF SLAB
DROP FOR FREEZER
STAIR101
VEST.102
FUTUREELEVATOR
103
VESTIBULE104
ELEV.105
STAIR106
LOADING BAY107
SOBEYS108
102101
105 106 107
109
110
111
112
114
115
118
119120
121
123
108
122
116
104
103
113
A3.6
20
A4.6
52
A3.6
24
A4.6
50
A4.8
77
A4.8
76
A4.9
85
A4.2
22
A4.10
89
A3.4
13
A3.3
11
A3.1
4 A3.2
5
A3.3
10
A3.2
9
A3.4
15
A3.1
2A3.1
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
21'-2" 15'-8" 31'-2" 32'-0" 28'-2" 16'-11 1/4"
145'-1 1/4"
15'-4
"13
'-8"
25'-5
"26
'-6"
26'-6
"17
'-0"
149'
-5"
25'-0
"
A3.3
12
A3.2
8
A3.2
7
A3.1
3
BB
A2.3
BB
A2.3
AA
A2.3
AA
A2.3
A3.4
14 A3.5
19
A3.2
6
CC
A2.4
CC
A2.4
W1
W6
P10SIM.
P10
P11
W8
W8
W8
W8
W8
W8
W8
ABOVE
W8 W8
W8
W8
ABOVE
W8
W8
P11W8
P11
P11
W8
W1
W6 W2 W2 W6W6W3W6
W7
W5
W8
W6
W5
W8W1ABOVE
W8
P5
P2
W8ABOVE
P5SIM.
P2
ABOVE
P12
P9
W4
SIM.
W4 SIM.
W3W2W3W2
W3
W2
W3
W2
W1
W1
W6
W6
W6
100'-8"T.O. WALL
W-1
ABOVE
W-4
ABOVE
W-4
ABOVEW-1
ABOVE
W-1
ABOVEW-1
ABOVE
W-5
ABOVE
W-5
ABOVE
W-5
ABOVE
W-11 W-11 W-11
W-4ABOVE
W-4ABOVE
W-4ABOVE
W-4ABOVE
W-3ABOVE
W-9
W-3ABOVE
W-9
W-3ABOVE W-9
SIM.
W-1a W-1a W-10BELOWBELOW
W-1aBELOW
W-6a
C E C I L P L A C E
Firm:Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic Bengert
Partner in Charge:Joe Tkalcic
Timeline:January - December 2006
Cecil Place is a development featuring two floors of office space above a main floorgrocery store and one level of underground parking. My involvement on the Cecil Place Commercial Development enabled me to experience the full scope of project delivery. As part of the schematic design team I was involved in the preparation of conceptual and analytical drawings, client presentations, and development permit application drawings.
During the construction documents phase of the project, I was responsible for the drafting of plans, sections, elevations; developing plan and section details, and coordinating door and window schedules.
Street-level Perspective Rendering ▼
Main Floor Plan ►
F a m i l i e s
S t u d i o s
C o u p l e s /
F a m i l i e s
70
20
60
Singles
COMMUNITIES:
• Often dealing with: substance abuse issues, peer pressure, abusive relationships
• Higher level of transience
• Require: integration environment, support, motivation, social assistance opportunities
Couples and Famil ies• Often single parent with children or parents with single child
• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants)
• Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary/protected
shelter, mutual support
Famil ies• Often families with multiple children (including new immigrant families), or roommates
• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrant
families)
• Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary/protected
shelter, mutual support in family friendly environment
F a m i l i e s
S t u d i o s
C o u p l e s /
F a m i l i e s
70
20
60
Singles
COMMUNITIES:
• Often dealing with: substance abuse issues, peer pressure, abusive relationships
• Higher level of transience
• Require: integration environment, support, motivation, social assistance opportunities
Couples and Famil ies• Often single parent with children or parents with single child
• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants)
• Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary/protected
shelter, mutual support
Famil ies• Often families with multiple children (including new immigrant families), or roommates
• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrant
families)
• Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary/protected
shelter, mutual support in family friendly environment
S t u d i o
O n e B e d r o o m
Tw o B e d r o o m
B O Y L E R E N A I S S A N C E T R A N S I T I O N A L H O U S I N G B U I L D I N G
Firm:Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic BengertPartner in Charge:Joe Tkalcic Timeline:May - August, 2010
Singles:+ Higher level of transience+ Often dealing with: substance abuse issues, peer pressure, abusive relationships+ Require: integration environment, support, motivation, social assistance opportunities
Couples & Families:+ Often single parent with children or parents with single child+ Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants) + Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary / protected shelter, mutual support
Families:+ Often families with multiple children (including new immigrant families), or roommates+ Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants)+ Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary / protected shelter, mutual support in family friendly environment
The Boyle Renaissance Master Plan pioneers a more extensive area structure plan that proposes a regeneration and densificationof Edmonton’s Downtown East Side, with the firstphaseofthemasterplanfocusingontheprovision of social resources. As a member of thedesignteamforthefirstphaseoftheBoyleRenaissance plan, I was actively engaged with the stakeholders to understand and defineproject priorities, identify potential synergies between user groups, and to produce early conceptual diagrams to help formulate a designresponsethatreflectedtheseintentions.Following this initial visioning of phase one, my scope of involvement shifted primarily to the schematic design of the Transitional Housing Building, and to a more detailed analysis of its unique objectives.
P re l im ina r y Concep t Ske tch ▲
ADJACENTBUILDING
RETAIL
LEGEND
OFFICE
RESTAURANT
PARKING
ADJACENTBUILDING
ADJACENTBUILDING
ADJACENTBUILDING
RELOCATERESTAURANT
RE-ORGANIZE OFFICE PROGRAM
INTEGRATEPARKING
STRUCTURE
ADJACENTBUILDING
RETAIL
LEGEND
OFFICE
RESTAURANT
PARKING
ADJACENTBUILDING
ADJACENTBUILDING
ADJACENTBUILDING
RELOCATERESTAURANT
RE-ORGANIZE OFFICE PROGRAM
INTEGRATEPARKING
STRUCTURE
Reorganization Diagrams ▼
Preliminary Concept Sketch ▲
WEST EDMONTON MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
Firm:Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic BengertPartner in Charge:Joe Tkalcic Timeline:May - August, 2010
As part of a larger mixed use development proposal in West Edmonton, this building provides over 200,000 s.f. of leasable officeand retail space. Presented with a provisional design for the entire site, my involvement in this project included an evaluation of the relationship between the constituent parts of the development, both within the boundaries of the site, as well as the consideration of potential impacts to the surrounding neighbourhood. Given the responsibility of advancing the designof theofficebuildingpresentedhere, Iproposed a reorganization of the building mass toaddressthespecificchallengesitpresented,while incorporating outdoor amenity spaces requested by the client. Ultimately, I produced the concept sketch and diagrams shown in order to discuss the potential benefits of thisreorganization with the client.
LIVE
WORK
SLEEP
Fema le C l i en t Pa th
Ma le C l i en t Pa th
Du ra t i on
24
12
AMPM
LIVE
WORK
SLEEP
LEGEND
LEGEND
4
3
7
8
1
1
1
111
1
11
1
1
11 1
23
2
1
0 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24
0 03 06 09
15 18 21 24
12
03
06
09
12
15
18
21
24
LIVE
WORK
SLEEP
Fema le C l i en t Pa th
Ma le C l i en t Pa th
Du ra t i on
24
12
AMPM
LIVE
WORK
SLEEP
LEGEND
LEGEND
4
3
7
8
1
1
1
111
1
11
1
1
11 1
23
2
1
0 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24
0 03 06 09
15 18 21 24
12
03
06
09
12
15
18
21
24
M O B I U S H O U S E
University of TorontoBachelor of Arts Architectural StudiesArchitectural Representation Studio II
Studio Advisor:Aziza Chaouni
Timeline:January - April, 2010
“24 Hours of Living” Diagram
This project argued that architectural drawings may be employed as analytical tools capable of exposing complex relationships and characteristics of buildings. Following this argument, the practice of diagramming may be used to distill and abstract the processes and conceptual strategies embedded in a project.
Noting this, the following diagrams were produced to analyze and expose the conceptual framework of UN Studio’s Mobius House. The project’s organizational strategy draws upon the endlessly repeating Mobius strip to show how a husband and wife who both work at home can live together yet apart. The Mobius strip presents a conceptual model which allows for periods of both isolation and interaction along a continuous path of travel. The closed loop of the Mobius House’s circulation system allows this cycle of convergences and divergences to occur several times over the course of a single day, and blurs the boundaries between conventionally distinct programmes into what the architects describe as “24 Hours of Living”.
As such, the drawings shown pay attention to the relationships between time, location and duration of use, moments of shared occupancy, the frequency of use among the three programmatic functions of “Live, Work, and Sleep”, and to the realized circulation infrastructure that permits these dynamic processes to unfold seamlessly over time.
LIVE
WORK
SLEEP
Fema le C l i en t Pa th
Ma le C l i en t Pa th
Du ra t i on
24
12
AMPM
LIVE
WORK
SLEEP
LEGEND
LEGEND
4
3
7
8
1
1
1
111
1
11
1
1
11 1
23
2
1
0 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24
0 03 06 09
15 18 21 24
12
03
06
09
12
15
18
21
24
Realized Mobius Loop
12
11
STUDIO 01 KITCHEN
07 KITCHEN WASHROOM
08 VERANDA
09 STUDIO 01 GARAGE
10 STUDIO 01 STUDIO 02
STUDIO 01 STUDIO 02
06 BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
01
02
03
04
05
24 BEDROOM
19 LIVING
20
VERANDA
VERANDA
21 STUDIO 01
CHILDREN’S
BEDROOMS
STUDIO 02
STUDIO 02
22 STUDIO 01 STUDIO 02
23 STUDIO 01 BEDROOM
18
13
14 LIVING STUDIO 02
15 MEETING STUDIO 02
16 GARAGE STUDIO 02
17 KITCHEN
FEMALE CLIENT PATHMALE CLIENT PATH
Conceptual DiagramsDaily Use Timeline
Realized Circulation Loop
01
01
02
03
04
05
02
Adelaide & SpadinaToronto, Ontario, 2011
Great Court, British MuseumFoster & PartnersLondon, England, 2010
Turbine Hall, Tate Modern MuseumHerzog & de MeuronLondon, England, 2010
Stair Tower detail, Lloyd’s of LondonRichard RogersLondon, England, 2010
Living Room, Seattle Public LibraryOMASeattle, Washington, 2013
T R A V E L S K E T C H B O O K
03 04
05
a. 165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205, Toronto, Ontario M5T.2L4 t. 1.647.389.5153 e. [email protected]
W