Top Banner
Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining Verya Nasri, PhD, PE University of Colorado Tunneling Short Course September, 2016
74

Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Aug 01, 2018

Download

Documents

duongthien
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining

Verya Nasri, PhD, PE

University of Colorado Tunneling Short Course

September, 2016

Page 2: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Design Considerations

Strength

Serviceability

Durability

Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete

Fiber versus rebar

Spray on concrete versus CIP concrete

Cast-in-Place Final Lining

Page 3: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Final Tunnel Linings

Liner Geometry Construction Method Area of Application

Page 4: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Road Tunnels

World Road Association (PIARC)

Page 5: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Rail Tunnels

Page 6: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Transit Tunnels

Page 7: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Subway Stations

Mined Cut and Cover

Page 8: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Geometry Optimization

Page 9: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Ventilation

Page 10: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Station Cross Section

Page 11: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Caverns in Competent Rock

Page 12: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Permanent SOE Wall

Munich

Page 13: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Underground Parking

Page 14: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Cut and Cover, Top-Down and Bottom-Up

Page 15: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Cut and Cover Tunnels

Page 16: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Immersed Tunnels

Page 17: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Final Tunnel Linings

Liner Loading Structural Analysis Design

Page 18: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Structural Loading

Page 19: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Uniform Rock Load

b=D/2

D D

b=D/2 45 º

Unbalanced Rock Load

Structural Loading

Page 20: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Groundwater Pressure

Drained and Undrained Concepts

.10Wbase

.25Wcrown

EFFECTIVE PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION

CROWN OF ARCH

WATER TABLE(HWL)

HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE

Page 22: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

2D Structural Analysis

Cut & Cover Box Mined Cavern

Beam-Spring Model

Page 23: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

3D Structural Analysis

Mined Cavern

Cut & Cover Box

Beam-Spring Model

Page 24: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Road Deck

Central LRT Precast Unit

In-situ Deck

Pavement Construction in Parallel with Excavation & Lining

Page 25: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Double Deck Road

Page 26: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Stacked Subway

Page 27: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Design Pressure Envelopes for Braced Cuts (Peck, 1969)

Page 28: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Excavation Sequence, Support Installation and Flow Analysis

Page 30: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Empirical Method (e.g. Q-System) Analytical Method (e.g. Key-Block) Numerical Method (Continuum and Discontinuum Modeling)

Initial Ground Support Design

Page 31: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Continuum Analysis • 2D modeling

• Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion • 50 % Relaxation, • Shotcrete Strength Varied With Excavation Sequence

Page 32: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Rock Mass Parameters

• Input - Intact Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) - Intact Rock Modulus (Ei) - Disturbance Factor (D) - Geological Strength Index (GSI) - Intact Rock Parameter (mi)

• Output - Hoek-Brown Strength Parameters - Rockmass Deformation Modulus

Page 33: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Continuum Analysis Results

• No Yielding of Initial Support

• Small Ground Surface Deformations

Page 34: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

FOLIATION

SUBVERTICAL STRUCTURE FAULT / SHEAR ZONE

CONJUGATE JOINTS

CLUSTER

Types of Discontinuities

Page 35: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Discontinuum Analysis

Rock constitutive model: Mohr-Coulomb elastic/plastic failure Joint constitutive model: Barton-Bandis joint model

Page 36: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Discontinuum Analysis Results

Page 37: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

3D Continuum Analysis

Page 38: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

3D Continuum Analysis Results

Page 39: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

3D Continuum Analysis Results

Page 40: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

3D Discontinuum Analysis

Page 41: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

3D Discontinuum Analysis Results

Page 42: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Seismic Design of Tunnel Final Lining

Design & Analysis Approach

Force Method for surface structures

Deformation Method for underground structures

Two-level seismic hazard (ODE and MDE)

Page 43: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Seismic Design of Tunnel Final Lining

Deformation modes of tunnels due to seismic waves

Page 44: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Fire Design of Tunnel Final Lining

Page 45: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Reduction of Strength and Stiffness of Concrete

Page 46: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Corrosion has been identified as No. 1 cause of deterioration in concrete sewers.

Quantitative approach to assess the corrosion of the concrete final lining

Measures to protect the concrete final lining

Final Lining Protection in Concrete Sewers

Page 47: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

The life expectancy of the concrete final lining:

L = z / C

L = service life, yr

z = thickness of allowable loss (thickness covering the reinforcing steel), in.

c = corrosion rate, in./yr

Life Expectancy of Concrete Final Lining

Page 48: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Example: Ameron T-Lock, a PVC sheeting that locks mechanically into the interior wall of concrete sewer pipes and tunnels

Liners and Coatings

Page 49: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

For a 100-year service life costly corrosion protection measures such as impermeable liners, coatings or polymer concrete are not warranted.

Use calcareous aggregate and sacrificial concrete cover

Sewers Subject to Low Corrosion Risk

Page 50: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Recommendation: A combination of corrosion protection schemes including

concrete with calcareous aggregates

sacrificial concrete thickness

protective lining

Initial Liner

CIP Liner

Protective Liner

Sewers Subject to High Corrosion Risk

Page 51: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Waterproofing, Drained and Undrained Concepts

Page 52: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Waterproofing Details

Page 53: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Initial Liner Smoothness Criteria

Page 54: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Materials: Geotextile, Membrane, and Attachment Disk

Page 55: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Membrane Installation and Testing

Page 56: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Sectioning, Water Barrier, and Remedial Grout Pipes

Page 57: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Sprayed on membrane Elongation at rupture %100

Bond strength 1 MPa

Tensile strength 2-4 MPa

Sprayed on Waterproofing Membrane

Page 58: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

New York City’s Second Avenue Subway

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project

Final Concrete Lining (Waterproofing and Concrete Stages)

Page 59: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Station Cavern – Walls

Page 60: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Station Walls – Forms & Rebar

Page 61: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Station Cavern – Finished Walls

Page 62: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Station – Arch Forming System

Page 63: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Station – Arch Forming System

Page 64: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Station – Arch Forming System

Page 65: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Tunnels – Invert Concrete

Page 66: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

72nd Street Station and Tunnels Project Tunnels – Arch Concrete

Page 67: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Final Tunnel Linings

Architectural Aspects Magenta Station, Paris

Page 68: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Different Types of Structural and Architectural Concrete

Light gray with satin finish for the entire structure Light gray with shiny finish for stair tunnels Light gray with rough finish for sidewalls of central cavern and side tunnels White only for columns and struts.

Page 69: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

More than 10 mix designs were Used to answer the structural and architectural requirements Large scale samples for testing the formwork surface and its accessories

Page 70: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Completed Station

Page 71: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Metal (copper, aluminum …), exotic wood, concrete with multiple finishes (white, satin, shiny …), marble

Page 72: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Entrance

Page 73: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Entrance

Page 74: Waterproofing and Final Tunnel Lining - Benjamin Media · Design Considerations Strength Serviceability Durability Plain concrete versus reinforced concrete Fiber versus rebar Spray

Thank You