Waterfront Culture (Tgs 1)

AR 6141

ARSITEKTUR,

BUDAYA DAN

PEMBANGUNANWIWIK D PRATIWI

michael lengkey 25209009

TUGAS 01

KARACHALIS NICHOLAS, Ph.D. Candidate, Departemen of Economic and Regional Development of Panteion University at Athens, Scientific

Collaborator of the Regional Development Institute of Panteion University

KYRIAZOPOULOS EVANGELOS, Ph.D. Scientific Collaborator of the Regional Development Institute of Panteion University

GREEK PORT CITIES IN TRANSITION :

REGENERATION STRATEGIES, WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT AND THE ROLE OF CULTURAL

AND TOURIST RESOURCES

source :

http://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?start=20&q=waterfront+investment+culture&hl=en&as_sdt=2000

(http://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa06/papers/714.pdf)

AR 6141 ARSITEKTUR, BUDAYA DAN PEMBANGUNAN

PORTCITY



DEFINISI

waterfront city : - the land of city/town alongside a body of water (www.allwords.com)- the area of a town or city alongside a body of water (www.dictionary.com)

kota tepian air : - kota yang berada di pinggiran badan air

klasifikasi sumber air antara lain : laut, sungai dan danau

KONTEKS

Kota Tepian Air (Waterfront City)

identik

pelabuhan (port/harbour)

pendukung transportasi :• antar pulau• fasilitas sumber daya alam &

laut• pariwisata• bisnis / perdagangan• dsb

penekanan / emphasizing

PORT CITIES /KOTA PELABUHAN

CHANGING


PORT CITIES in TRANSITION/KOTA-KOTA PELABUHAN dalam PERALIHAN

KOTAERA

REVOLUSI INDUSTRIPELABUHAN

berkembang

sarana keluar masuk

Kota & Pelabuhan mengalami pertumbuhan yang cepat

pada waktu yang bersamaan ;

merupakan hasil dari tuntutan INDUSTRI

• INTERDEPENDENCE (saling ketergantungan)• CONFLICT• COMPETITION


yang dipengaruhi/dibesarkan

(Kotea 1995)

POLICY


CONTEMPORARY GREEK PORT POLICY/ KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH

SAILING CULTURE/BUDAYA MELAUT

the greek port system includes 1250 ports, marinas, piscatorialshelters, small harbours registered in the 188 Central Coast GuardOffice & Station

Greece is the country with most active ports between the 25members-states of the EU / uni eropa. European Sea PortsOrganisation (ESPO, 2005)

BUDAYA MELAUT /SAILING CULTURE

• aktifitas• jumlah

of PORTS

(monitoring & controlling) as responbility


• ministry of merchant marine• local government• port fund bodies

stabilitas masyarakatdan lingkungan

DEVELOPING


WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT AND REGENERATION/ PENGEMBANGAN & REGENERASI


COCCOSIS 1999 waterfront is vital environmental and aesthetic importance and that it facesmany problems (intense land pressures, environmental pollution, conflict ofuses, etc) especially when it is part of an urban conglomeration

competition• SERVICE• FACILITY• URBAN NEEDS dampak

traffic & environmental problems

• traffic, area extension inability(ketidakmampuan perluasanwilayah pelabuhan),

• restriction in the hours and typesof horbour work(pembatasan waktu & jenispelayanan)

port to city

city to port

the city & the port astwo contacting system

konsep #1

- saling mengambil keuntungancity to port ; port to city

- mempertahankan urban system yangtelah ada


konsep pengembangan/ perbaikan kota (urban) ;keep or change ; stay or move

meningkatan kualitas perkotaan(increasing urban quality) melalui- lokasi baru yang dinilai lebih memiliki

prospek- optimalisasi fungsi lokasi sebelumnya

metode pendekatan• revitalisasi / revitalization• pemindahan /relocation• fungsi baru / new urban place

port city

• POLICY (pemerintah dengan kebijakan dan aturannya)• PRACTICES (investor/pengembang)


memasukan fungsi baru/ infill new “agendas”

konsep #2

lebih meningkatkanperan budaya, dankepariwisataan

• attractive• consumable• more incomes

• CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE• MEGA-EVENTS• ADVANCED TOURIST FACILITIES

regenerate / regenerasi : perubahan(port cities) dengan tujuan meningkatkankualitas perkotaan (life & image)

objektifitas konsep 1 dan konsep 2

since 1960 until today the practices in regeneration of waterfronts can be presented through four generation(Marshall 2001, Panagopoulos and Argyriadis, 2003)

1960s-1070s basic element : revitalization of historical identity with thesimultaneous rejection of “orthodox architecture” throughcollaboration of

• local business community• dynamic local autorities• port itself

baltimore’s inner harbour, seattle,oakland, san fransisco, london,liverpool, rotterdam


1980s perencanaan kota lebih baik : prestigious architectural,implemented urban planning affecting the whole city, notonly the waterfront

boston’s charleston harbour,sidney’s darling harbour and capetown, london docklands andbarcelona’s port vell

1990s karakter dasar (yang ditekankan) adalah “cultural city”,exploitasi heritage assets dan perencanaan lingkunganyang berkelanjutan

cardiff, liverpool, birmingham,manchester, amsterdam, vancouverand shanghai

2000 - now karakter dasar (yang ditekankan) adalah “do not differ”konsep “the knowledge economy” melalui sejarah danbangunannya

dipengaruhi perencanaan kotakontemporer

amsterdam, genova and hamburg

THE ROLE



THE ROLE OF CULTURAL AND TOURISM RESOURCES/ PERAN BUDAYA DAN KEPARIWISATAAN

URBAN IMPROVEDURBAN

ECONOMIC

urban strategies(miles and paddison 2005)

implisit promoting cities and region through . . .

• creativity• assets• people

URBAN IMPROVEDURBAN

ECONOMIC

resources (tourism, nature)

culture ( of port cities)

urban strategies (Florida 2002)

advanced / upgrading

preseden ;“red light district”, offer great opprtunitiesfor cultural and leisure enterproses due tolarge, cheap spaces and the historicalatmosphere.

IMPLEMENTATION



BEST PRACTICE AND EXAMPLES IN EUROPE/ PENERAPAN TERBAIK DAN CONTOH

regenerationre-use

intervention “star architect”

rehabilitation

POLICIES (PEMERINTAH)PRACTICES (PENGEMBANG/SWASTA)

example: industrial space for cultural purposesand waterfront developments of harbourseafronts.- bilbao (the guggenheim museum)- dan masih banyak lagi……..

port cities are often presented as the most successful stories of culture-led regeneration(bianchini and parkinson 1993, garcia 2005)

sustainability

JOINT PUBLICITY

FOCUS ON CULTURE

EXTRA FUNDING

PROGRAMMING

M A N A G I N G(palmer/rae 2004)

NEW LOCAL IDENTITY

CONDITION ; ISSUES & PROBLEMS

CONCLUSION /KESIMPULAN

COMPETITIONprogram

ARCHITECTURE& DESIGN

NEW EXPERIENCING

NEW FORMS OFURBAN SPACE

MORECHALLENGING


CONSIDERATION / avoid the negative impact of regeneration

• lack connected of social housing schemes inhousing developments

• centralizing cultural activities• many actors that involved in the policy making

(uncooperate/co-ordination problems)• the absence of urban tourism plan• untreated assets (heritage or re use industrial

heritage site)• lack of attractiveness (tourism context)• increasing diverse local population = conflict• lost connection within cultural clustering


COMPLETED


Waterfront Culture (Tgs 1)

Documents