WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND STATUS IN MALAYSIA 2010 … · water supply and demand status in malaysia 2010 ‐ 2020. suruhanjaya perkhidmatan air negara span. 1

WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND STATUS IN MALAYSIA 2010‐2020SURUHANJAYA PERKHIDMATAN AIR NEGARA 

SPAN

1

2

Introduction: Managing our Water Resources

3

Introduction: Managing our Water Resources

4

Introduction: Managing our Water Resources

5

Introduction: Managing our Water Resources

6

Improve service provision: reliability and qualityStrengthen utility performance: finances,

management, operations.Expand, replace, renew, improve water supply and

sewerage services facilities.More efficient and appropriate investments and

operations to stretch scarce financial resources.Enormous resources needed to meet demand.

The Challenge For Water Utilities In Malaysia

7

The Need to Reform the Water Services Industry

8

9

10

11

12

13

DAM

RIVERWATER TREATMENT 

PLANT

BALANCINGRESERVOIR

SERVICERESERVOIR

CONSUMER

SEPTIC TANK

SEWERAGETREATMENT PLANT

RIVER

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM WASTEWATER SYSTEM

SOURCE

State GovernmentDepartment of EnvironmentDepartment of Irrigation and Drainage

TREATMENT & DISTRIBUTION TREATMENT & DISCHARGE

SPAN

HOW THE INDUSTRY IS REGULATED UNDER WSIA

CATCHMENT AREA

Ministry of Health

14

•300 nos (Sewerage Products)

15

Available Rainfall in Malaysia

Rainfall990 bil. m3

Evaporation360 bil. m3

(36%)Surface Run‐off566 bil. m3

(57%)Groundwater64 bil. m3

(7%)

Although Malaysia has abundance of rainfall, but it does not fall at the right time and right place thus not all the water are stored and 

used to fulfill water demand in different sectors. 

Million Cubic Meter (mcm) per Year 

Water Demand2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Potable Water 5,277 6,796 7,663 8,529 9,291Irrigated Paddy Cultivation 8,266 9,112 8,049 7,641 7,205Non‐paddy Crops Cultivation 1,113 1,124 1,130 1,146 1,172Fisheries 1,287 1,593 1,923 2,390 2,898Livestock 126 175 248 365 561Total 16,068 18,799 19,014 20,072 21,127

16

Projected Water Demand For All Sectors in Malaysia 2010 to 2050

Potable Water33%

Irrigated Paddy 

Cultivation51%

Non‐paddy Crops 

Cultivation7%

Fisheries8%

Livestock1%

Notes:Source of data : The Review of the NWRS 2000‐2050

Year

projection in year 2010

17

Overview on Current and Future Water Supply and Demand until 2020

Notes:Source of data (1981 to 2010) : The MWIG 2011

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

MLD

Year

Total Plant Design Capacity

Total Plant Production

Projected Demand (based on NWRS)

Projected Available Supply 

(based on RM Ke‐9/10 & BP)

17,600

14,740

18

Raw Water Resources For Potable Water 2009 and 2010

State

2009 2010

MLD MLD

Direct Extraction From River

Storage Dams (Direct)

Ground Water

TotalDirect 

Extraction From River

Storage Dams (Direct)

Ground Water

Total

Johor 1,029 446 N/A 1,475 1,002 566 N/A 1,586Kedah 1,246 16 N/A 1,262 1,277 15 N/A 1,292Kelantan 200 N/A 148 348 226 N/A 150 377Labuan 40 11 0.7 51 39 12 0.3 51Melaka 289 216 N/A 506 298 214 N/A 512N. Sembilan 509 420 N/A 929 466 374 N/A 840Pulau Pinang 895 96 N/A 991 1,011 78 N/A 1,089Pahang 1,090 N/A 4 1,094 1,035 N/A 28 1,063Perak 1,021 319 N/A 1,340 884 447 N/A 1,331Perlis 50 53 8 112 106 44 5 156Sabah 649 258 24 931 707 272 19 998Sarawak 892 100 N/A 993 940 109 0.4 1,049Selangor 3,914 153 N/A 4,067 4,014 144 N/A 4,158Terengganu 571 N/A 0.1 571 614 N/A N/A 614

MALAYSIA 12,398 2,088 185 14,671 12,620 2,274 204 15,098

Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & PutrajayaSource of data : The MWIG 2011

19

Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & Putrajaya* Total design capacity for WTPs operated by Johor water operators is 1,620MLD and WTPs operated by PUB Johor Waterworks is 159MLD Source of data (year 2010)           : The MWIG 2011 Source of data (1st quarter 2011): Water operators

State

2010 1st Quarter 2011

No. of Operational Treatment Plants

Treatment Plants Design Capacity

Total Production

Production  Design Capacity/Available Supply

Total Production

Production

Reserve Margin

Reserve Margin

[MLD] [%] [MLD] [%]

Johor 42 1,779* 1,476 17.0 1,779* 1,471 17.3

Kedah 33 1,261 1,198 4.9 1,261 1,223 3.0

Kelantan 32 360 377 0 401 396 1.2

Labuan 3 60 49 18.3 105 55 47.6

Melaka 8 506 443 12.4 506 456 9.9

N. Sembilan 22 794 724 8.7 794 724 8.8

Pulau Pinang 10 1,273 /1,065 957 10.1 1,273 /1,065 960 9.9

Pahang 76 1,190 966 18.8 1,190 1029 13.6

Perak 46 1,726 1,080 37.4 1,726 1,095 36.6

Perlis 4 233 147 36.6 233 160 31.5

Sabah 51 1,107 931 15.8 1,107 N/A N/A

Sarawak 84 1,279 1,055 17.5 1,279 N/A N/A

Selangor 33 4,476/ 4,326 4,063 6.1 4,476/ 4,326 4,075 5.8

Terengganu 14 889 598 32.7 889 596 33.0

PENISULAR MALAYSIA 320 14,129 12,029 14.9 14,170 12,185 14.0

MALAYSIA 458 16,575 14,065 15.1 16,661 N/A N/A

Water Treatment Plant Design Capacity & Production 2010‐ 2011

20

Supply & Demand Projection Preamble

The water supply & demand projections and the listedsource/infrastructure works for all the states are based on theinformation/data contained in the following documents:

i.The Review of the National Water Resources Study (NWRS)2000‐2050

ii.3‐Year and 30‐Year Business Plan (BP) submitted by the wateroperators

iii.Continued water supply projects from RM Ke‐9 into RM Ke‐10

iv. Approved water supply projects in RM Ke‐10 and proposedprojects in RM Ke‐10 Rolling Plan 2

v.The Malaysia Water Industry Guide (MWIG) 2011

Water Demand Projection Criteria

General criteria for water demand projectionadopted in the NWRS Report include:i.Population Growth

ii.Per Capita Consumption (PCC)

iii.Water Demand for:

•Domestic

•Industrial•Commercial

•Institutionaliv. Non‐Revenue Water (NRW)

v. Service Factor 21

Population Projections Median Growth in ‘000 ppl 

StatePopulation Projections in ‘000 ppl

2010 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050Johor 3,458 3,802 4,117 4,533 4,879 5,140Kedah 2,043 2,251 2,440 2,695 2,906 3,065Kelantan 1,677 1,899 2,104 2,427 2,686 2,901Melaka 785 859 925 1,008 1,078 1,129Negeri Sembilan 1,032 1,116 1,190 1,274 1,348 1,399Pahang 1,573 1,727 1,867 2,050 2,203 2,317Perak 2,441 2,634 2,810 3,004 3,177 3,294Perlis 246 269 291 319 343 361Pulau Pinang 1,609 1,732 1,841 1,958 2,064 2,133Selangor 6,970 7,486 7,951 8,443 8,896 9,195Terengganu 1,149 1,302 1,445 1,672 1,854 2,006Sabah 3,267 3,600 3,874 4,400 4,719 4,958Sarawak 2,660 2,905 3,127 3,505 3,839 4,117FT Labuan 88 95 101 110 115 118Peninsular Malaysia 22,983 25,077 26,981 29,383 31,434 32,940East Malaysia 6,015 6,600 7,102 8,015 8,673 9,193Malaysia 28,998 31,677 34,083 37,398 40,107 42,133Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & PutrajayaSource of data: The Review of the NWRS 2000‐2050 

22

Year

Population Projections Median Growth in %

Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & PutrajayaSource of data: The Review of the NWRS 2000‐2050 

23

State

Annual Average Growth Rate in %2010 to

2015 

2015 to

2020 

2020to

2030 

2030to

2040 

2040to

2050 

Average (2010 to2050)

Johor   1.99 1.66 1.01 0.76 0.53 1.19Kedah   2.04 1.68 1.05 0.78 0.55 1.22Kelantan   2.65 2.16 1.54 1.07 0.80 1.64Melaka   1.89 1.54 0.90 0.69 0.47 1.10Negeri Sembilan   1.63 1.33 0.71 0.58 0.38 0.93Pahang   1.96 1.62 0.98 0.75 0.52 1.17Perak   1.58 1.34 0.69 0.58 0.37 0.91Perlis   1.87 1.64 0.96 0.75 0.52 1.15Pulau Pinang   1.53 1.26 0.64 0.54 0.33 0.86Selangor   1.48 1.24 0.62 0.54 0.34 0.84Terengganu   2.66 2.20 1.57 1.09 0.82 1.67Sabah   2.04 1.52 1.36 0.73 0.51 1.23Sarawak   1.84 1.53 1.21 0.95 0.72 1.25FT Labuan   1.59 1.26 0.89 0.45 0.26 0.89Peninsular Malaysia   1.82 1.52 0.89 0.70 0.48 1.08East Malaysia   1.95 1.52 1.29 0.82 0.60 1.24

Malaysia   1.85 1.52 0.97 0.72 0.51 1.11

Year

FT Labuan  Perlis  K'tan  Melaka N. S'lan  T'ganu Pahang P. Pinang Perak  S'wak  Sabah  Kedah  Johor  S'gor

Actual Water Demand 2010 49 147 377 443 724 598 966 957 1,080 1,055 931 1,198 1,476 4,063

Planning Demand 2015 64 175 527 552 834 949 1,110 1,224 1,301 1,554 1,558 1,596 1,885 4,901

Planning Demand 2020 79 202 677 665 948 1,165 1,265 1,470 1,567 2,250 2,034 1,835 2,310 5,875

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

MLD

Actual Water Demand 2010

Planning Demand 2015

Planning Demand 2020

Planning Demand Projections Year 2015 & 2020

Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & PutrajayaSource of data for planning demand projection: The Review of the NWRS 2000‐2050 Source of data for actual water demand 2010: The MWIG 2011

24

K'tan  Kedah  S'gorN. 

S'lan P. 

Pinang Melaka  Pahang  Sabah  Johor  S'wak  T'ganu  Perlis  Perak 

FT Labuan 

Planning Demand ‐8.6% ‐6.7% ‐3.6% ‐0.3% 0.9% 0.9% 4.9% 7.5% 9.0% 9.3% 26.3% 24.7% 30.2% 42.3%

K'tan Kedah 

S'gor

N. S'lan 

P. Pinang 

Melaka  Pahang 

Sabah 

Johor 

S'wak 

T'ganu 

Perlis 

Perak 

FT Labuan 

‐20.0%

‐10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

25

Reserve/Shortfall Margin For Planning Demand (1st Quarter 2011) 

New works required (10 states)

Forward planning works required 

(1 state)

Comfortable margin until 

2020 (3 states)

Shortfall M

argin (%

)Re

serve Margin (%

)

Overview of Water Sustainability in Malaysia

Comfortable margin until 2020 (3 states)

PERAK

PERLIS

26

New works  are required  from 2011 to 2015 (10 states)

KELANTAN

JOHOR

KEDAH

SELANGOR

N. SEMBILAN

SABAH

SARAWAK

MELAKA

Forward planning works are required from 2016 to 2020 (1 state)

PAHANG

LABUAN

P. PINANG TERENGGANU

KEDAH

27

CAPEX for Continuation Projects

Approved CAPEX for New WorksUnder RM Ke‐10 (FRP & SRP)

State

Projects

Raw Water Transfer Scheme

New/ Upgrading Dam

New Water Supply Scheme

WTP Upgrading/ Refurbishment

New Distribution 

NRW Programme/ 

Pipe Replacement

Total No. of  Projects

FRP SRP FRP SRP FRP SRP FRP SRP FRP SRP FRP SRP FRP SRPKedah 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 7 5Selangor 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 9 3FT Labuan 3 1 1 1 1 6 1Sabah 5 2 3 5 5Sarawak 1 1 2 4 1 7 4 3 3 14 12Kelantan 1 4 5 1 5 6Johor 3 3Pulau Pinang 1 1 2Melaka 1 1 1 1 2 2Negeri Sembilan 1 3 2 1 5 2Terengganu 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 3Pahang 15 11 2 2 17 13Perak 4 3 4 2 1 4 9 9Perlis 1 1 2

Total 2 1 8 2 41 26 14 8 16 9 12 15 93 61

Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & Putrajaya 28

Reserve/Shortfall Margin in Year 2015With New Source/Infrastructure Works

StateAvailable Supply [MLD]

Actual Demand Projection Planning Demand Projection Sustainability of Supply With New 

Source/ Infrastructure Works

[MLD]Reserve/Shortfall*

Margin [%] 

[MLD]Reserve/Shortfall* 

Margin [%]

Sabah  1,282 1,416 ‐10.5* 1,558 ‐21.5*

Sarawak  1,319 1,413 ‐7.1* 1,554 ‐17.8*

Kedah  1,506 1,451 3.7 1,596 ‐6.0*

Pulau Pinang 1,295 1,113 14.1 1,224 5.5 2016 (1Q)

Melaka 616 502 18.5 552 10.4 2017 (4Q)

Johor  2,126 1,714 19.4 1,885 11.3 2017 (4Q)

Selangor 5,776 4,455 22.9 4,901 15.2 2019 (2Q)

Kelantan  667 480 28.1 528 20.9 2019 (2Q)

Negeri Sembilan  1,014 758 25.3 834 17.8 2020

Terengganu 1,232 863 30.0 949 23.0 2020

Perlis  241 159 34.0 175 27.3 2020

Perak  1,809 1,183 34.6 1,301 28.1 2020

Pahang 1,794 1,009 43.8 1,110 38.1 2020

FT Labuan 105 58 44.2 64 39.1 2020

Forward planning works arerequired

Newworks arerequired

StateAvailable Supply 

[MLD]

Actual Demand Projection Planning Demand Projection

[MLD]Reserve/Shortfall* Margin [%]

[MLD]Reserve/Shortfall* 

Margin [%]Sarawak  1,319 1,875 ‐42.2* 2,250 ‐70.6*

Sabah  1,282 1,695 ‐32.2* 2,034 ‐58.7*

Kedah  1,531 1,529 0.1 1,835 ‐19.9*

Pulau Pinang 1,420 1,225 13.7 1,470 ‐3.5*

Kelantan  667 564 15.4 677 ‐1.5*

Johor  2,317 1,925 16.9 2,310 0.3

Negeri Sembilan  1,014 790 22.1 948 6.5

Melaka 726 554 23.7 665 8.4

Perak  1,809 1,306 27.8 1,567 13.4

Selangor 6,906 4,896 29.1 5,875 14.9

Perlis  241 168 30.3 202 16.2

Terengganu 1,555 971 37.6 1,165 25.1

FT Labuan 105 66 37.0 79 24.4

Pahang 1,824 1,054 42.2 1,265 30.6

29

Reserve/Shortfall Margin in Year 2020 With New Source/Infrastructure Works

Notes:Selangor includes FT KL & Putrajaya

Forward planning works are required

Newworks arerequired

Sabah  S'wak  Kedah  K'tan P. 

PinangMelaka Johor  S'gor N. S'lan  T'ganu Perlis  Perak  Pahang

FT Labuan

Actual Demand ‐10.5% ‐7.1% 3.7% 11.9% 14.1% 18.5% 19.4% 22.9% 25.3% 30.0% 34.0% 34.6% 43.8% 44.2%

Planning Demand ‐21.5% ‐17.8% ‐6.0% 3.2% 5.5% 10.4% 11.3% 15.2% 17.8% 23.0% 27.3% 28.1% 38.1% 38.7%

Sabah S'wak 

Kedah 

K'tan 

P. PinangMelaka

Johor S'gor

N. S'lan  T'ganu

Perlis Perak 

Pahang

FT Labuan

‐30.0%

‐20.0%

‐10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

Actual Demand

Planning Demand

New works required (5 states)

30

Reserve/ Shortfall Margin in Year 2015 With New Source/ Infrastructure Works

Forward planning works required (8 states)

Shortfall M

argin (%

)Re

serve Margin (%

)

32

• NRW ACHIEVEMENT (2011)

STATESNRW %

2008 2009 2010 2011 (Jan-Jun 2012)

1 Johor 31.3 31.9 29.9 29.2 28.2

2 Kedah 45.0 44.9 44.9 47.8 47.5

3 Kelantan 49.4 48.3 52.4 55.6 54.2

4 Labuan 33.2 25.8 24.9 21.9 15.7

5 Melaka 30.1 29.7 26.0 25.1 23.4

6 Negeri Sembilan 50.5 49.2 43.4 44.6 40.8

7 Pulau Pinang 16.9 19.1 18.2 18.4 17.2

8 Pahang 52.9 59.9 55.3 56.2 51.9

9 Perak 31.4 30.7 29.4 30.4 30.7

10 Perlis 41.7 44.7 51.3 59.8 64.2

11 Sabah* 55.7 49.4 57.4 50.9 N/A

12 Sarawak* 29.4 29.5 29.0 30.5 N/A

13 Selangor 33.9 32.5 32.4 32.3 32.6

14 Terengganu 38.0 37.9 39.4 37.0 37.9

Average For Malaysia 36.9 36.3 36.4 36.7 N/AAverage for Peninsular Malaysia and Labuan 36.2 36.6 35.4 36.1 35.3

33

• NRW ACHIEVEMENT (2012)

STATE

2011 2012

%

Q1 Q2(JAN – MAC) (APR – JUN)

('000 m3)%

('000 m3)%

ProductionConsu‐mption

NRW Production Consu‐mption NRW

Johor 29.2 138,107  98,800  39,307  28.5 140,910  101,601  39,309  27.9

Kedah 48.7 110,107  57,116  52,991  48.1 118,366  62,885  55,481  46.9

Kelantan 55.6 36,935  16,320  20,614  55.8 36,499  17,325  19,175  52.5

Melaka 25.1 42,279  31,988  10,292  24.3 42,615  33,048  9,567  22.5

Negeri Sembilan 44.6 65,437  38,642  26,795  40.9 66,339  39,375  26,964  40.6

Pahang 56.2 92,922  45,457  47,465  51.1 96,984  45,978  51,005  52.6

Perak 30.4 104,512  71,933  32,579  31.2 104,880  73,248  31,632  30.2

Perlis 59.8 17,081  6,731  10,349  60.6 18,351  5,964  12,387  67.5

Pulau Pinang 18.4 87,896  72,478  15,418  17.5 87,549  72,777  14,772  16.9

Selangor 32.2 384,821  257,960  126,861  33.0 391,375  264,540  126,835  32.4

Labuan 21.9 4,987  4,033  955  19.1 4,720  4,154  566  12.0

Terengganu 37 55,057  34,756  20,301  36.9 55,433  33,858  21,575  38.9

TOTAL 36.1 1,140,141  736,215  403,925  35.4 1,164,019  754,752  409,267  35.2

34

• NRW ACHIEVEMENT (2012) – Cont…

STATE 2011 

20122012

(JAN – SEP)Q3 (JUL – SEP) 

('000 m3) % 

('000 m3) % 

Production Consu‐mption

NRW  Production Consu‐mption

NRW 

Johor  29.2 143,031  102,280  40,751  28.5 422,047  302,681  119,366  28.3

Kedah  48.7 119,376  59,546  59,830  50.1 347,848  179,547  168,301  48.4

Kelantan  55.6 36,959  17,444  19,516  52.8 110,393  51,089  59,304  53.7

Melaka  25.1 44,416  34,042  10,374  23.4 129,310  99,078  30,232  23.4

Negeri Sembilan  44.6 67,968  40,370  27,599  40.6 199,744  118,387  81,358  40.7

Pahang  56.2 101,043  45,182  55,860  55.3 290,949  136,618  154,331  53.0

Perak  30.4 108,980  75,346  33,635  30.9 318,372  220,527  97,845  30.7

Perlis  59.8 19,282  6,078  13,203  68.5 54,713  18,773  35,940  65.7

Pulau Pinang  18.4 88,219  72,840  15,380  17.4 263,664  218,095  45,569  17.3

Selangor  32.2 399,250  267,611  131,639  32.9 1,175,446  790,111  385,335  32.7

Labuan  21.9 5,561  4,297  1,264  22.7 15,268  12,484  2,784  18.2

Terengganu  37.0 58,406  36,595  21,811  37.3 168,896  105,209  63,687  37.7

TOTAL 36.1 1,192,491  761,630  430,860  36.1 3,496,650  2,252,597  1,244,053  35.6

35

Water Treatment Plant Design Capacity & Production 2008‐ 2009

Remarks:Selangor includes FT KL & PutrajayaSource of data: The MWIG 2011

State

2008 2009

No. of Operational Treatment Plants

Treatment Plants Design Capacity

Total Production

ProductionNo. of 

Operational Treatment Plants

Treatment Plants Design Capacity

Total Production

Production

Reserve Margin

Reserve Margin

[MLD] [%][MLD] [%]

Johor 42 1,604 1,430 10.8 42 1,612 1,466 9.1

Kedah 32 1,185 1,157 2.4 32 1,185 1,173 1

Kelantan 31 356 341 4.2 32 360 343 4.7

Labuan 3 60 47 21.7 3 60 48 19.9

Melaka 6 489 428 12.5 6 489 443 9.4

N. Sembilan 23 748 665 11.1 22 747 659 11.8

Pulau Pinang 10 1,273 896 29.6 10 1,273 913 28.3

Pahang 77 1,195 915 23.4 77 1,197 915 23.6

Perak 45 1,413 1,014 28.2 46 1,726 1,039 39.8

Perlis 3 110 108 1.8 3 110 109 0.5

Sabah 42 869 820 5.6 49 1,076 877 18.5

Sarawak 83 1,201 956 20.4 85 1,202 1,015 15.6

Selangor 33 4,483 3,889 13.3 33 4,476 3,926 12.3

Terengganu 15 905 547 39.6 14 889 567 36.2

PENINSULAR MALAYSIA 317 13761 11390 17.2 317 14064 11553 17.9

MALAYSIA 445 15,891 13,213 16.9 454 16,403 13,495 17.7

36

Summary

In 1st Quarter 2011• 3 states are having comfortable high reserve margin for the

planning demand and not requiring any new major source orinfrastructure works until year 2020:

o Perlis (24.7%)

o Perak (30.2%)

• Although Terengganu state is having comfortable reserve marginfor the planning demand of 26.3%, it requires new source andinfrastructure works in order to meet the projected high demandgrowth

o FT Labuan           (42.3%)

37

Summary

• 10 states are having either shortfall margin or reserve margin lessthan 10% for the planning demand and require new works to beimplemented in year 2011 to 2015 in order to meet the futuredemand up to year 2015 except Pahang

o Kelantan (‐8.6%)

o Kedah (‐6.7%)

o Selangor (‐3.6%)

o Negeri Sembilan (‐0.3%)

o Pulau Pinang (0.9%) 

• Although the reserve margin of Pahang is only 4.9%, the existingavailable supply is able to meet the demand up to year 2018due to the lower demand growth therefore only forwardplanning works are required to meet the demand beyond year2020

o Melaka (0.9%)

o Pahang (4.9%)

o Sabah (7.5%) 

o Johor (9.0%) 

o Sarawak (9.3%)

38

Summary

In Year 2016‐2020•Only 5 states are having shortfall margin for the planning demand i.e.unable to meet the planning demand:oSarawak (‐70.6%)oSabah (‐58.7%)oKedah (‐19.9%)

•Sabah and Sarawak are having high shortfall margin due to the non‐availability of the information on the proposed source or infrastructureworks beyond year 2015

With the timely implementation of proposed new source orinfrastructure works under RM Ke‐9 & 10 and Business Plan:

In Year 2011‐2015•Only 4 states are having either shortfall margin or reserve marginless than 10% for the planning demand i.e. unable or with limitedcapacity to meet the planning demand:oSabah (‐21.5%)oSarawak (‐17.8%)

o Kedah (‐6.0%)o Pulau Pinang        (5.5%)

o Pulau Pinang        (‐3.5%)o Kelantan               (‐1.5%)

39

Summary• States that are unable or with limited supply capacity to meet

planning demand after implementation of new source orinfrastructure works approved under RM Ke‐10 or Business Plan bywater operators, are Sabah, Sarawak, Kedah, Pulau Pinang andKelantan

• The shortfall and deficit of supply can be overcome byimplementing some potential and feasible projects as proposed inthe review of the NWRS

• Appropriate actions, timely reviews and implementation of newsource and infrastructure works from year 2011 to 2020 arerequired to ensure a sufficient available supply and a comfortablereserve margin to meet the planning demand and to assure a longterm sustainability of water supply

40

Conclusion

1. Effective collaboration amongst stakeholders particularly Federal and State Agencies to protect raw water resources;

2. Clear and consistent Government policies;3. Independent and effective Regulator;4. Strong commitment to drive efficiency and

effectiveness on the part of service providers and5. Effective consumers’ participation to provide objective

feedbacks on service delivery.

SUCCESS OF REFORM HINGES ON:

TERIMA KASIH

41