Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd. Andrew J. Waldera February 19, 2014 Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd. WATER RIGHTS 101 AND DUE DILIGENCE — THE LEGAL SIDE OF AGRICULTURE
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
Andrew J. WalderaFebruary 19, 2014
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
WATER RIGHTS 101AND DUE DILIGENCE — THE
LEGAL SIDE OF AGRICULTURE
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• The waters of the State of Idaho are a publicresource and the State of Idaho owns the water,not the individual water users.
Ownership of Water
02/19/2014 2
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Water right holders merely own the right to use acertain amount of water for the purposes and underthe conditions set forth in the permit, license, ordecree.
Ownership of Water (cont.)
02/19/2014 3
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• The State of Idaho, more particularly the IDWR,administers the waters of the state according to theprior appropriation doctrine, which operates uponthe basic premise of “first in time is first in right.”
Prior Appropriation Doctrine
02/19/2014 4
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Appropriation of water is its physical diversion fromits source and its application to a beneficial use.
Appropriated water isappurtenant to theground upon which it isapplied.
Appropriation of Water
02/19/2014 5
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• In general, only water in its natural state can beappropriated. This includes water flowing in anatural channel or stream, springs flowing at thesurface, and ground water to the extent that thesewaters have not been fully appropriated already.Water flowing in non-natural channels (such ascanals, laterals, or ditches) ordinarily cannot beappropriated, as it has already been appropriated byanother.
Appropriation of Water (cont.)
02/19/2014 6
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
– Irrigation– Domestic uses– Stockwatering– Municipal supply– Commercial uses– Industrial uses– Cooling– Fish propagation
(aquaculture)
Beneficial Use
02/19/2014 7
• Beneficial uses recognized in the State of Idahoinclude:
– Recreation– Fire protection– Power generation– Mining– Ground water
recharge– Fish & Wildlife– Heating
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Name and address of owner• Source of water – ground water or surface water –
name of stream• Quantity – cubic feet per second; gallons per day;
acre-feet• Priority date – determinative of the right to use
water relative to all other water rights
Elements of a Water Right
02/19/2014 8
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Point of diversion – legal description of where wateris diverted from its source
• Place of use – specifies property upon which thewater may be applied
• Purpose or nature of use – the beneficial use• Season of use – dependent upon purpose of use
Elements of a Water Right (cont.)
02/19/2014 9
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Traditionally, all that was required was the diversionof water from its source and its application to arecognized beneficial use.
• 1963 – Legislation enacted requiring that thoseseeking to appropriate ground water must apply andobtain a permit and subsequent license from IDWR.
• 1971 – Amended legislation requiring sameapplication and administrative process for theappropriation of surface water.
Obtaining Water Rights
02/19/2014 10
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Not recognized in Idaho for over a century.• Riparian rights are rights that permit owners of land
to make “reasonable use” of ground water beneathone’s land, or surface water flowing on, through, oralong one’s land.
• Riparian rights are incidental to land ownership andcannot be lost. Rights developed under the priorappropriation doctrine are incidental to beneficialuse and can be lost or “forfeited.”
Riparian Rights
02/19/2014 11
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Form furnished by IDWR• Public process (publication)• Opportunity for protest• Administrative hearing (if necessary)• Permit granted either in whole or in part
(conditioned if necessary)• Proof of beneficial use (another form furnished by
IDWR)• Field examination• Issuance of license• Application criteria – Idaho Code Section 42-203A(5)
Application for Permit
02/19/2014 12
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Once secured from IDWR, or adjudicated by theSRBA Court, transfers (changes made to theelements of a water right) and changes in ownershiprequire that proper application and/ordocumentation be submitted to and approved byIDWR.
Changes in Water Rights
02/19/2014 13
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Injury of existing rights• Enlargement• Beneficial Use• Conservation of water resources• Local public interest
Transfers can be approved in whole or in part(based upon appropriate conditions), or can bedenied in their entirety.
Application is public process.
Transfer Evaluation CriteriaIdaho Code Section 42-222
02/19/2014 14
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Decreed• Licensed• Beneficial use-based• Permit
The overlay of the Snake River BasinAdjudication (“SRBA”) — Claims vs. Partial Decrees
Types of Water Rights/Claims
02/19/2014 15
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Idaho Code Sections 42-222 and 42-223• Water rights are forfeited and water reverts back to
the state if the water is not applied to beneficial usefor a period of five continuous years
• Extension applications – reasonable cause• Resumption of beneficial use• Irrigation delivery entities (irrigation districts and
canal companies) generally exempt from forfeiturethough they must still have sufficient acreage withintheir boundaries for the application of water
Forfeiture
02/19/2014 16
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Residents within irrigation district or canal companyboundaries do not “own” the water rightsappurtenant to the ground
• Rights are held in trust for benefit of the landownerswithin the boundaries
• Individuals may have their “own” supplementalground water rights separate and apart from thosedelivered by an irrigation entity
Ownership of Rights Revisited
02/19/2014 17
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Lots of moving parts = lots of pitfalls• Conduct a full water rights inventory for the subject
parcel• Due diligence review and inventory applies equally if
“subject parcel” is only a water right itself
Due Diligence
02/19/2014 18
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Proposed transaction include any and all appurtenantwater rights?
• Partial or full severance/withholding of water rights?• Sources of water on the property (surface or ground)?
• Purely private delivery or irrigation entity or both?– Infrastructure implications (maintenance obligations)
• “Private” water rights properly structured/documented?
• Delivery points involve express or prescriptiveeasements?
• Notice of buried irrigation conduit?
Dirt-Based Transactions
02/19/2014 19
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• General rule – water rights are appurtenant to theground to which, or where, they are applied
• Water rights are severable, however, either in wholeor in part
• Because water is so valuable and marketable,sellers/owners are getting much more savvy and aresevering water rights at least in part
Intent of the Transaction
02/19/2014 20
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Buyer beware – specific contract language ends alldoubt
• Insist on expressly calling out and defining the waterrights and the requisite infrastructure . . . “alltenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances” isnot good enough in my opinion
• If you have done your homework why not employ it?
Intent of the Transaction (cont.)
02/19/2014 21
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Ground or surface• Infrastructure• “Private” or irrigation entity delivery• 42-1201, 1202, 1203, 1204 (duties and obligations)• Any intermediaries such as a lateral ditch water
users association?• Applicable assessments (irrigation entity and/or
association)• Tax deed implications for delinquent assessments
Sources of Water and Extent of Rights
02/19/2014 22
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Idaho Code Section 42-1201 (1899)• Idaho Code Section 42-1202 (1899)• Idaho Code Section 42-1203 (1899)• Idaho Code Section 42-1204 (1881)
Irrigation Entity/InfrastructureOwner Duties/Responsibilities
02/19/2014 23
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Those who “own or control” irrigation facilities mustmaintain sufficient flow of water through thesystem during the irrigation season to meet theneeds of those entitled to receive the watertherefrom.
Idaho Code Section 42-1201
02/19/2014 24
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Those who “own or control” irrigation facilities mustmaintain the same and keep them in “good repair”for the delivery of water to those entitled to thedelivery.
Idaho Code Section 42-1202
02/19/2014 25
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Owners of irrigation facilities must “carefully keepand maintain” any embankments constituting thefacilities in “good repair” so as to minimize and/orprevent the wasting (leaking) of water. Ownersmay only turn a proper amount of water into thefacility so as not to overwhelm its capacity, therebyresulting in the waste of spilled water breaching thelevels of the embankments.
Idaho Code Section 42-1203
02/19/2014 26
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• The “owners or constructors” of irrigation facilities,and their successors in interest, must “carefully keepand maintain the same” in “good repair” so as notto damage or in any way injure the property ofothers.
• Grants right-of-way for purposes of cleaning,maintaining, and repairing the irrigation facility—including the right to deposit debris or spoils on thebanks of the facility.
Idaho Code Section 42-1204
02/19/2014 27
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Irrigation facilities may involve either expresseasements and rights-of-way or prescriptiveeasements and rights-of-way
• Idaho Code Section 42-1102– irrigation easements and rights-of-way are
“essential”– surface facilities provide notice of underlying
easement and right-of-way– cannot interfere; see also, Idaho Code Sections
42-1207, 1208, and 1209– not defined, just reasonable and necessary
• Buried facilities need express easements, or atthe least Notices of Buried Irrigation Conduit –recorded with the county in its real propertyrecords
Easements and Infrastructure
02/19/2014 28
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Private water rights properly structured/documented?– Chain of title up to date (Notice of Change in
Water Right Ownership)?– Subject to water supply bank lease?– Status (application for permit, permit, license,
decree, claim in SRBA vs. partial decree)
Dirt-Based and Water-Based Transactions
02/19/2014 29
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
– Properly claimed and defended through theSRBA?
– Assigned or severed and sold previously?– Subject to any leasehold interests?– Subject to pending transfer?– Subject to the security interest of another?
Dirt-Based and Water-Based Transactions(cont.)
02/19/2014 30
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• IDWR website (www.idwr.idaho.gov)• SRBA website (www.srba.state.id.us)• County Recorder’s Office
The IDWR and SRBA websites are excellentsources of information that are searchable bymultiple means such as water right number,property location, claimant/entity name. Manydocuments are scanned and available.
Sources of Information
02/19/2014 31
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
Once the dust from the transaction settles:• Notice of Change in Water Right Ownership• Lending Security – Notice of Security Interest
New Ownership and Financing Consideration
02/19/2014 32
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Form provided by IDWR• Form must be provided to IDWR within 120 days of
the new ownership – do not run the risk of theDepartment or others taking action regarding yourwater right without your knowledge
• Notice attaches property conveyance instruments asproof of transaction
Notice of Change in Ownership
02/19/2014 33
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Form provided by IDWR• Those giving proper notice will be notified of any
proposed action regarding the covered water right• Notice must attach/include documentary evidence
of the applicable security interest, including theexpiration date or other date defining the end of thetime period during which notice of IDWR action isdesired
Notice of Security Interest
02/19/2014 34
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Notice of security interest provides a greater level ofprotection than simply relying upon water rightreferences in the real property transactiondocuments such as the mortgage – and it is veryeasy to do.
Notice of Security Interest (cont.)
02/19/2014 35
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Shares or stock certificates of canal, ditch orirrigation companies are personal property.Consequently, they are not deemed appurtenant toreal property and are not controlled by the Notice ofSecurity Interest form filing with IDWR.
Shares or Stock Certificates
02/19/2014 36
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Traditional language used in these documents: “allappurtenances” or “all appurtenant water rights”does not include conveyance of shares or stockcertificates. They should be specifically identified aspersonal property which is part of the sale/purchase.A Bill of Sale or assignment document is typicallyused.
Deeds and Real Estate Agreements
02/19/2014 37
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
• Encumbrance of the personal property consisting ofshares or stock certificates must be completed byfiling a UCC 1 financing statement with the IdahoSecretary of State. It is advisable to provide a copyto the canal, ditch, or irrigation company.
Security Interest
02/19/2014 38
Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
Andrew J. WalderaMoffatt Thomas Barrett Rock &
Fields, Chtd.101 S. Capitol Blvd., 10th Floor
P.O. Box 829Boise, ID 83701
[email protected](208) 345-2000(800) 422-2889
For more information or questions,please contact:
3902/19/2014