Page 1 Government of Rajasthan RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT Watershed Development & Soil Conservation Department Rajasthan, Jaipur District Watershed Development Unit - Sikar Detailed Project Report IWMP (2009-10) - MAU (Sikar-IV) Project Area : 5370 ha. Project Cost : Rs. 805.5 Lacs Submitted by :- Project Implementing Agency Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti, Shrimadhopur
179
Embed
water.rajasthan.gov.inwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed-development-and-soil-conservation...2.1 Demography Details 2.2 Development Indicators 2.3 Land use 2.4 Agriculture
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1
Government of Rajasthan
RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT
Watershed Development & Soil Conservation Department Rajasthan, Jaipur
District Watershed Development Unit - Sikar
Detailed Project Report
IWMP (2009-10) - MAU (Sikar-IV)
Project Area : 5370 ha.
Project Cost : Rs. 805.5 Lacs
Submitted by :-
Project Implementing Agency
Assistant Engineer
Panchayat Samiti, Shrimadhopur
Page 2
DPR TEMPLATE Index
S.No Topics Page no.
1 Chapter • Location • General Features of watershed (Cost and Area details) • Climatic and Hydrological information • Other Development Schemes in the project area • Details of infrastructure in the project areas • Institutional arrangements (,DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC)
2 Chapter Basic Data ,Analysis and Scope
2.1 Demography Details 2.2 Development Indicators 2.3 Land use 2.4 Agriculture status and Productivity Gap Analysis 2.5 Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture status 2.6 Land holding pattern 2.7 Livestock status 2.8 Fodder status 2.9 Farm Implements 2.10 NREGS Status 2.11 Migration details 2.12 Livelihood Details. 2.13 Existing SHG 2.14 Ground Water details 2.15 Drinking Water Status 2.16 Water use efficiency 2.17 Slope details 2.18 Water Budgeting 2.19 Soil Details 2.20 Soil erosion status
3 Chapter Proposed Development Plan 4 Chapter Activity wise Total Abstract of cost 5 Chapter Annual Action Plan
5.1 Project fund 5.2 Convergence Plan
6 Chapter Project outcomes 7 Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities 8 Enclosures
8 .1 Maps 1. Location –District, block, village, watershed location map 2. Map of Project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map 3. Land Use Land Cover map 4. Existing water bodies, DLT 5. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)
Page 3
6. GIS based intervention map 7. Treatment map ie proposed works on revenue map
8.2 Documents of Agreements:
• Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval
• Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution
• Documents related to PRA exercise
• Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval
• Proceedings of Panchayat Samiti General body for DPR approval
• Watershed Committee Registration certificate
• MoU – PIA – DWMA, PIA – WC(in case of NGO as PIA)
Page 4
CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTION
Location. MAU Project is located in Srimadhopur Block, of SIKAR district. The project area is between the
latitudes 27O 35’-40’, 70O 25’-30’ & longitudes. It is at a distance of 10 km from its Block head
quarters and 74 Kms from the district head quarters. There are 06 no. of habitations in the Project
The watershed falls in Agroclimatic Zone 2A .The soil texture is Sandy The average rainfall is
472cm . The temperatures in the area are in the range between 30 to 50 centigrade during
summer and 2 to 38 centigrade during winter. The major crops in the area are (Bajar, Chawla, Guar, Wheat, Gram, Masted). land is under cultivation 3954.86. 63%, land fallow 2.74% land is
wasteland. 7.57% land is irrigated through well, Tube well 210 No of households are BPL(5.32% households) 38 are landless households(3.49%
households) and 3470 household are small and marginal farmers(87.93% household) .Average
land holding in the area is 1.3 ha. 86% area is single cropped area and 14% is double cropped.
The main source of irrigation is Tube well. The average annual rainfall (5 years) in the area is 472
mm. The major festivals in the village are Holi, Deepawle & Rakchhbandhan. At present this
village is having 25471 population with Communities like Jat, Gurjar and Kumawat, Balai.
Climatic and Hydrological information 1 Average Annual Rainfall(mm)
4 Temperature (Degree C) Season Max Min i) Summer Season 50 30 ii) Winter Season 38 0.5 iii) Rainy Season 42 18
Page 6
4. Details of infrastructure in the project areas
Parameters Status (i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an all-
weather road 06
(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 06 (iii) No. of households without access to drinking water Nil (iv) No. of educational institutions : (P)
(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Centre 06 (vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary 03 (vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 04 (viii) No. of villages with access to Banks 02 (ix) No. of villages with access to Markets/ mandis 06 (x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries Nil (xi) Total quantity of surplus milk 28 Qu./day (xii) No. of milk collection centres (U)
6. Name of PIA Assistant Engineer P.S. Srimadhopur
7. Designation Ass. Eng.
8. Address with contact no., website P.S. Srimadhopur
9. Telephone 01575-250033
10 Fax 01575-250033
11 E-mail
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S.No
Name of
WDT
member
M/F Age
Qualification
Experience in
watershed(Yrs)
Description of
professional
training
Role/ Function
1 Bajarang
Lal
M 30 B.Tech.civil One year B.Tech.civil All Civil work
activity
2 Narsingh
Lal
M 32 B.Sc. (Ag) Four Year B.Sc. (Ag) All Agriculture
activity
3 Ashok
kumar
M 26 H.Secodary One year L.S.A. All live stock
activites
Page 8
Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
S.N.
Name of WCs
Date of Gram Sabha for WC
Date of Registratio
n as a Society
(dd/mm/yyyy
Designation Name M/F
SC/ST/ OBC/
General
Landless/ MF/SF/ BF
Name of UG/SHG
Educational qualification
1 W.C.Mau 11.08.010
21.01.011 S .N.- 261
President Ramu singh/ Hnuman singh M GEN.
MF Arable land Conservation 8
Secretary Chain singh/ Sohan singh M GEN.
SF Secretary M.A.
Member Chothi devi w/o mohan F SC
SF Entry Point activity 5
Pinky devi w/o kanaram F OBC
SF Non Arable land Conservation 10
Ratni devi w/o Kanaram F OBC
SF Arable land Production 5
Mali devi W/o Chhitarmal F OBC
MF small saving Shaksar
Chothmal / Partapram M ST
MF Non arable land production B.A.
Babulal / Maliram M OBC SF Small saving 8 Norang lal / Kishnaram M OBC
SF line non arable conservation 8
Manohar lal / Panchuram M SC
SF Small saving 10
Nandaram / Murliram M OBC
SF Solar Light 5
Prabhu dyal / Narayan M SC
SF Animal Hus. 8
Nanuram / Chunaram M OBC
SF Small saving 10
Suresh kumar / Manohar M GEN
SF Solar Light B.Com.
Chhigan lal/ Ganguram M OBC
SF Animal Hus. 8
Ashok kumar / bholaram M OBC
SF Small saving B.Com.
Page 9
Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
S.N.
Name of WCs
Date of
Gram Sabha
for WC
Date of Registratio
n as a Society
(dd/mm/yyyy
Designation Name M/F
SC/ST/OBC/
General
Landless/MF/SF/ BF Name of UG/SHG Educational
qualification
1
W.C.Hanspur
11.08.010
21.01.011 S .N.- 260
President Subash / Matadin M GEN
MF Arable land Conservation 10
Secretary
Banwari lal / Rameshwar M GEN
SF Secretary 10
Member Vinod / Chitaranjan M GEN SF small saving M.A.
Madan lal /Nanga M ST SF Non Arable land
Conservation 10 Gopal /Jhutharam M OBC SF small saving 8 MOtilal / Kanaram M OBC MF Animal Hus. 10 Dayal / NathuRam M SC MF small saving Shaksar Saduram /Nathuram M GEN
SF Non arable land production 10
Parhalad / Bhagwan M OBC
SF small saving B.A.
Lichhama w/o Satish F SC
MF Arable land Production M.A.
Vidhya w/o Gordhan F SC
LL Land les Shaksar
Narbdha w/o Hajari F ST MF Solar Light s Shaksar
Muli w/o Bhagirth F OBC SF Anicut
Conservation Shaksar
Page 10
Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
S.N.
Name of WCs
Date of Gram
Sabha for WC
Date of Registration as a Society
(dd/mm/yyyy
Designation Name M/F
SC/ST/OBC/
General
Landless/MF/SF/
BF Name of UG/SHG Educational
qualification
1
W.C. Ratanpur
11.08.010
09.12.010 S .N.- 208
President Jagdish / Jutharam M OBC
BF Arable land Conservation 8
Secretary Mohanlal / Suwalal M SC
SF Secretary M.A.
Member Dhura / Mahadev M OBC SF small saving 5
Rameswarlal / Ghisaram M SC
MF Non Arable land Conservation 8
Manaram /Nekiram M OBC
SF small saving 10
Nathuram / Mangalram M OBC
SF Animal Hus. Shaksar
Rajender / Chhoturam M SC
LL small saving 8
Shanti w/o Parbatram F OBC
BF Non arable land production Shaksar
Sawarmal / Parbatram M OBC
SF small saving 10
Pooja w/o Mukesh F SC
MF Arable land Production 8
Rameswari w/o Ramesawr F OBC
SF Land les Shaksar
Bhagoti w/o mohanlal F SC
SF Solar Light s 5
Balveer / Magan M GEN BF Anicut Conservation 10 Jhutharam /Rudaram M OBC
SF Shaksar
Page 11
Problems and scope of improvement in the project area The socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production which can be achieved by crop rotation, hybrid seed &
using improved agriculture practices .
729.18 ha is only irrigated and with efforts this can be increased to 821.67 . The productivity gap of major crops in the area as compared with
district and with areas in the same agro climatic zones indicate potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of
practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small
land holdings in the area focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green houses, Agro forestry,
fodder crops)and diversification in Livelihoods(Agriculture, Animal husbandry, self employment)
2489 Quintal fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development .Improved animal Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of livestock. 475
no of persons migrate due to less opprtunity of employment this migration can be checked through creation of employment opportunities in the project area
through increase in production and diversification in agriculture and Livelihoods as mentioned above.
Page 12
CHAPTER – II
2.1 .1 DEMOGRAPHY DETAILS AND HOUSEHOLD DETAILS:- POPULATION & HOUSEHOLD DETAILS:
Village Male Female Total SC ST
Hanspur 2229 2146 4375 536 246
NagalBheem 2009 1933 3942 641 88
Mau 3781 3609 7390 788 125
Ratanpura 2211 2129 4340 533 0
Arniya 1912 1841 3753 260 -
Bagariwas 2241 2192 4433 500 219
TOTAL 14383 13850 28233 3302 665
2.1.2 BPL HOUSEHOLD DETAILS Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Hanspur 21 18 21 09 69
NagalBheem 06 02 06 01 15
Mau 08 03 09 02 22
Ratanpura 11 - 04 01 16
Arniya 19 03 18 04 48
Bagariwas 16 13 09 02 40
TOTAL 81 39 67 19 210
Page 13
2.1.3 MARGINAL FARMER HOUSEHOLD DETAILS Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Hanspur 31 19 178 129 357
NagalBheem 26 - 161 97 28-4
Mau 28 11 203 196 438
Ratanpura 23 - 198 81 302
Arniya 25 06 158 78 267
Bagariwas 29 14 164 143 350
TOTAL 162 50 1062 724 2004
2.1.4 SMALL FARMER HOUSEHOLD DETAILS Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Hanspur 09 07 153 109 278
NagalBheem 14 01 76 53 144
Mau 18 05 89 146 258
Ratanpura 11 - 139 78 228
Arniya 06 - 148 102 256
Bagariwas 09 05 162 126 302
TOTAL 67 18 767 614 1466
Page 14
2.1.5 GENERAL (BIG) FARMER HOUSEHOLD DETAILS Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Hanspur 2.50 3.61 33.39 11.29 50.79
NagalBheem - - 22.75 19.37 42.12
Mau 3.10 - 39.28 34.68 77.06
Ratanpura - - 837.65 58.75 896.40
Arniya - - 26.78 2.15 28.93
Bagariwas 6.19 4.12 22.11 5.10 37.52
TOTAL 11.79 7.73 981.96 131.34 1132.82
2.1.6 ABSTRACT HOUSEHOLD DETAILS Household Details SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Marginal Farmer Household 162 56 1062 724 2004
Small Farmer Household 67 18 767 614 1466
Big Farmer Household 4 2 73 49 128
TOTAL Household 233 76 1902 1387 3598
Table 2.2 Development indicators
S. No. Development Indicators State Project Area
1 Per capita income (Rs.) 16260 6700 2 Poverty ratio 0.22 25.3 3 Literacy (%) 0.604 63.5 4 Sex Ratio 921 970 5 infant mortality rate 6 maternal mortality ratio
The table indicates poor socio economic conditions.
Page 15
Table 2.3 Land Use
Land Use Total area in Ha.
Private Panchayat Government Community Total Agriculture Land
• These Data’s Sources are Rajasthan Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2009-10 (Average Last 5 year upto 2008-09) & Krishi Marg Darshika 2009.
Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in productivity within state and even within same agro climatic
zones.
The reasons for this variation are
• The farmers are using varieties DESI of Bajra whereas the recommended varieties like Pioneer 86m 86, J.K. 26, Pro. Agro 94.44, provide 35-40 Qut./Ha. yield (write for all crops)
• Lack of Availability of good quality seeds of desired crop and variety in adequate quantities and time to the farmers.
• Availability of water for cultivation(13.57% is irrigated table2.3) The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop demonstration .Crop demonstrations would be
carried out on improved crops/ varieties, improved agronomic practices. INM, IPM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit.
Demonstration of improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation seeds of Forage Crops for further
multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop rotations.
Table 2.5 Existing area under horticulture/Vegetables/Floriculture (ha)
Activity Area Species Varieties Recommended varieties
The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities, enhancing farm level economy, increases the income of the people engaged in animal husbandry by dairy, poultry and marketing and value addition. (As discussed earlier) and diversification in livelihoods .
The existing livelihoods Activities are given below
Page 26
Table 2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)
Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income from the /hh
2.12.(C) The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities will be made under livelihood component through assistance to SHG or individuals
S.No Name of SHG Members Bank With A/C no.
Activity involved
Monthly income
Fund available
Source of assistance
Training received
1. Pinky SHG. Bagriyawas 10 RGB
shrimadhopur Milk Production 500 6550 WD& SC -
2. Anjali SHG. Bagriyawas 10 RGB
shrimadhopur Milk Production 400 4000 WD& SC -
3. Suman SHG. Hanspur 10 RGB
shrimadhopur Tailring 450 7550 WD& SC -
4. Sushila SHG Hanspur 10 RGB
shrimadhopur Tailring 500 2500 WD& SC -
5. Jyoti SHG Ratanpura 10 RGB
Nathusar Tailring 500 3000 WD& SC -
6. Shyam SHG Ratanpura 10 RGB
Nathusar Milk Production 500 3500 WD& SC -
7. Sumitra SHG Arniya 10
G. S. S. Arniya
Live Stock (Goat and Sheep)
200 3200 WD& SC -
8. Chameli SHG Arniya 10
G. S. S. Arniya
Live Stock (Goat and Sheep)
500 5000 WD& SC -
9. Mamta SHG Arniya 10 G. S. S.
Arniya Milk Production 400 3500 WD& SC -
10. Saroji SHG Arniya 10 G. S. S.
Arniya Milk Production 500 2000 WD& SC -
11. Kamla SHG Mau 10 RGB
shrimadhopur Bundi bandhey 500 3500 WD& SC -
12. Kushum SHG Mau 10
RGB shrimadhopur
Vegetable and Furit Preservation
500 5000 WD& SC -
The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to be strengthened through trainings and financial assistance
Page 28
II. Technical Features
Table 2.14 Ground Water S.No Source No. Functional
• The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water. • Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on every operational wells Table 2.17 Slope details.
Slope of Watershed S.No. Slope percentage
Area in hectares
1 0 to 3% 5242 2 3 to 8% 128 3 8 to 25% - 4 > 25% -
As most of the area has slope less than 3% construction of contour bunds can solve the problem of water erosion in agriculture fields and protect
washing of top soil and manures/fertilisers
Page 30
Table 2.18Water Budgeting Table 2.18 a )Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table
Area Type of
Catchment
Yield of runoff from catchment per ha.(cum.) use Stranges table
Total Runoff
5370 Average 1743174 1045904 Total
Table 2.18 b) Details of already stored runoff(Surface Water structures S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (cum) Area irrigated
(ha) i) Major Irrigation Project - - - ii) Medium Irrigation Project - - - iii) Form Ponds/Tanks 21 315000 - iv) Anicuts - - - Total
Table 2.18 (c) Balance available runoff (cum)
Total run off Net tapped
Runoff Balance Run off
Available for Harvesting (0.75*
1 2 3 4 Total of Table
2.18 a Table 2.18
b (2-1) 0.75*3 1045904 315000 730904 548178
The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area
Page 31
Table 2.19 Soil details Soil Profile S.No. Major Soil Classes Area in hectares
1 Sandy Soil 5370 2
Soil Depth : B Depth (Cms.) Area in hectares
1 0.00 to 7.50 - 2 7.50 to 45.00 70 3 > 45.00 5300
C Soil fertility Status Kg/ha N 1.67 – 2.33 P < 23 K < 142 Micronutrients Zink .47 PPM Iron 4 PPM
The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to every farmer every crop season will be provided, which
will include the recommendation for Application micro nutrient and fertilizers
Page 32
Table 2.20 Erosion details
Erosion status in project Area
Cause
Type of
erosion
Area affected
(ha)
Run off(mm/
year) Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year) Water erosion
a Sheet 2423 372 4.9 b Rill 1719 372 4.9 c Gully 1228 372 4.9
Sub-Total Wind erosion NA Total for project 5370
The need is:
• To check land degradation • To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock • To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water conservation measures • To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds • To check Faulty agriculture techniques • To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks • To check Deforestation of steep slopes • To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to recharge Ground Water structures life Earthen check
dams, gully plugs, Bank Stabilisation, Loose stone check Dams, Gabions, Earthen embankment (Nadi) and Anicuts would be taken up.
Page 33
CHAPTER – III
Proposed Development Plan
A Plan has been developed for Treatment & development of project area. in each basic need. such as soil & water conservation. Horticulture. Agroforestry, and Live stock Dry Land Horticulture subsitute of agriculture & cash crop. New varities seeds demostrations water harvesting structure to store water, project plan also includes landless. So it will develop over over seanerio.
A) Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA
The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign, slogans and wall writings etc. were carried out in all the
habitations of Mau Micro Watershed. A series of meetings were conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the
implementation of IWMP programme. User groups were also formed.
Grama Sabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the watershed committee and approval of DPR.
S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabha approved EPA
1 Hanspur 29.10.2010
2 Mau 29.10.2010
3 Nathusar 29.10.2010
4 Arniya 29.10.2010
5 Bagariwas 29.10.2010
Page 34
1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
S. No. Names of village
Amount earmarked
for EPA Entry Point Activities planned Estimated
cost Expenditure
incurred Balance Expected outcome
Actual outcome
1 Mau 459971 Solar street light system with mounting structure&pole in mau from panchayat
bhawan to khoribas via bus stand
459971 459971 -
300000 Three phase tuebell and pipeline near panchayat bhawan in mau
300000 - 300000
160000 Single phase tuebell near dungari tanki mau
160000 - 160000
2 Ratanpura
(Nathusar)
266299 Solar light 266299 266299 - 80000 hand pump in jat maliyan dhani of
Raranpur village 80000 - 80000
80000 hand pump in dhani amawali jane wale chaurahe par Raranpur village
80000 - 80000
3 Bagrariya was
363135
Solar light 363135 363135 -
150000 Tuebell in helliwali dhani 150000 - 150000 4 Arnia 363135 Solar light 363135 363135 -
80000 Hand pump in arnia village mohalla balayan
80000 - 80000
80000 Hand pump in arnia village at Ganpatkesha ke makan ke pass
80000 - 80000
5 Hanspur 484180 Solar light 484180 484180 - 180000 Single phase tuebell Beri
Nangalbheem 180000 - 180000
175280 Single phase tuebell patayawali takarwala johara Hanspur
175280 - 175280
TOTAL 3222000 3222000 1936720 1285280
Page 35
The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:
S.no Name of the village/Habitation
Date on which PRA conducted
1 Hanspur Jun-Aug2010
2 NagalBheem Aug-Oct2010
3 Mau Jun-Sept2010
4 Ratanpura Oct-Dec2010
5 Arniya Jun-Sept2010
6 Bagariwas sept-Dec2010
Transact walk were carried out involving the community for Social mapping, Resource mapping. Detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were carried out. Socio-economic survey was carried out during Jun-Dec2010(dates) period covering all the households and primary data on demography, Land holdings, Employment status, Community activities etc. was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.
State remote sensing department was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level
Various thematic layers provided by SRSAC are :
• Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries. • Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area. • Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area. • Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements). • Land Use / Land cover map. • Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map
Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map .
.
Page 36
CHAPTER - I V :- Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Name of Grampanchyat :- 1. Mau, 2. Araniya, 3. Hasnpur, 4. Nathusar, 5. Bagariyawas Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Effective Project Area :- 5370 ha. Project Cost :- 805.5 lacks S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.)
1. Geographical Area 5939.40 2. Treatable Area 5370.00 3. Arable land 4684.04 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 729.18 (B) Un- Irrigated 3954.86 4. Govt. land 1255.36 (A) Pasture land 686.01 (B) Govt. land treatable -
Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Fodder Production/ Demons. 6.8 6.8 Purchasing of Bulls etc, Others 0.30 6 1.8 1.8 Distribution of mangers 9.50 9.50 Micro Enterprise 10.20 10.20 Total (C) 144.46 120.83
23.63 (D) Consolidation 24.16 24.16
Sub Total A,B,C,D 829.13 805.50
23.63
Agriculture extn Dept. ( E ) Convergence with NREGA & Agri. Extn. Department Drip irrigation near tanka 0.21 50 10.50
7.35 3.15
Only Horticulture (orchad ) 1.00 25 25
17.5 7.5 Khet talai 1.06000 5 5.30
3.71 1.59
Crop Demostration 0.01000 70 0.70
0.49 0.21 Total
41.50
29.05 12.45
Animal Husbandary Department Animal Health Camps 0.15 40 6.0
4.20 1.80
NREGA Nadi Excavation & Pal making 10.00 6 60.00
42.00 18.00
Work cat.-4th 1.05 40 60.00
42.00 18.00 Total
120.00
84.00 36.00
Total (E)
167.50
117.25 50.25 Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E)
996.63 805.5 117.25 73.88
Page 38
CHAPTER - I V :- Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Name of Grampanchyat :- 1. Mau, 2. Araniya, 3. Hasnpur, 4. Nathusar, 5. Bagariyawas Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Effective Project Area :- 5370 ha. Project Cost :- 805.5 lacks S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.)
1. Geographical Area 5939.40 2. Treatable Area 5370.00 3. Arable land 4684.04 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 729.18 (B) Un- Irrigated 3954.86 4. Govt. land 1255.36 (A) Pasture land 686.01 (B) Govt. land treatable -
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
CHAPTER - I V :- Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Name of Grampanchyat :- 1. Mau, 2. Araniya, 3. Hasnpur, 4. Nathusar, 5. Bagariyawas Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Effective Project Area :- 5370 ha. Project Cost :- 805.5 lacks S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.)
1. Geographical Area 5939.40 2. Treatable Area 5370.00 3. Arable land 4684.04 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 729.18 (B) Un- Irrigated 3954.86 4. Govt. land 1255.36 (A) Pasture land 686.01 (B) Govt. land treatable -
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Gram panchayat-4. Hanspur Gram panchayat-5. Nathusar Total G.P.-1,2,3,4,5
CHAPTER – V :- Annual Action Plan Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Name of Grampanchyat :- 1. Mau, 2. Araniya, 3. Hasnpur, 4. Nathusar, 5. Bagariyawas Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Effective Project Area :- 5370 ha. Project Cost :- 805.5 lacks S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.)
1. Geographical Area 5939.40 2. Treatable Area 5370.00 3. Arable land 4684.04 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 729.18 (B) Un- Irrigated 3954.86 4. Govt. land 1255.36 (A) Pasture land 686.01 (B) Govt. land treatable -
Chapter V Annual Action Plan IWMP - Mau (sikar-IV)
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total
Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Effective Project Area :- 1095.10 ha. Name of Grampanchyat :- Araniya Project Cost :- 164.26 lacks Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Chapter V Annual Action Plan IWMP - Mau (Sikar-IV)
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total
Unit Unit Cost Quantity
Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Conservation measures for arable land Contour bund/ Field bunding With Waste weir ha 0.25 104.5 26.12 0 0 0 0 20 5 25 6.25 40 10 10 2.5 9.5 2.37 104.5 26.12 Earthen Structure with Waste weir/ Water Harvesting No 3 0.6 1.8 0 0 0 0 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.6 0 0 1.0 0.60 0 0 3 1.80
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.) 1. Geographical Area 1607 2. Treatable Area 1095.10 3. Arable land 940.15 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 215.65 (B) Un- Irrigated 724.50 4. Govt. land 166.85 (A) Pasture land 154.95 (B) Govt. land treatable
Total (E) 31.50 4.74 14.60 3.25 3.10 5.81 31.50 Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E) 195.76 8.72 7.43 23.83 56.60 45.33 29.34 24.51 195.76
Page 51
CHAPTER – V :- Annual Action Plan
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Effective Project Area :- 500.35 ha. Name of Grampanchyat :- Bagariyavas Project Cost :- 75.05 lacks Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Chapter V Annual Action Plan IWMP - Mau (Sikar-IV)
(B) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total
Unit Unit Cost
Quantity
Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Conservation measures for arable land Contour bund/ Field bunding With Waste weir ha 0.25 57 14.23 0 0 0 0 10 2.5 15 3.75 20 5.0 5 1.25 7 1.73 57 14.23 Earthen Structure with Waste weir/ Water No 0.67 10 6.7 0 0 0 0 2 1.34 3 2.01 2 1.34 2 1.34 1 0.67 10 6.7
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.) 1. Geographical Area 694 2. Treatable Area 500.35 3. Arable land 454.22 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 107.35 (B) Un- Irrigated 346.87 4. Govt. land 239.78 (A) Pasture land 46.13 (B) Govt. land treatable
Page 52
Harvesting Structure Bank Stabilisation/ Peripheral Bund Rm
Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture Development (Overseeiding) ha 0.21 10 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.11 5 0.1 0 0 0 0 10 0.21
Total (E) 26.74 3.09 3.73 14.59 3.24 2.09 26.74 Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E) 101.79 4.05 3.30 15.60 86.63 29.50 12.70 10.01 101.79
Page 55
CHAPTER – V :- Annual Action Plan
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Effective Project Area :- 1367.31 ha. Name of Grampanchyat :- Hanspur Project Cost :- 205.10 lacks Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Chapter V Annual Action Plan IWMP - Mau (Sikar-IV)
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total
Unit Unit Cost
Quantity
Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Conservation measures for arable land Contour bund/ Field bunding With Waste weir ha 0.25 296 74 0 0 0 0 50 12.5 50 12.5 50 12.5 96 24 50 12.5 296 74 Earthen Structure with Waste weir/ Water Harvesting No 0.734 25 18.35 0 0 0 0 5 3.67 5 3.67 5 3.67 5 3.67 5 3.67 25 18.35
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.) 1. Geographical Area 1423.30 2. Treatable Area 1367.31 3. Arable land 1246.44 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 177.64 (B) Un- Irrigated 1068.80 4. Govt. land 177.87 (A) Pasture land 120.92 (B) Govt. land treatable
Page 56
Structure
Bank Stabilisation/ Peripheral Bund Rm
Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture Development (Overseeiding) ha 0.021 10 0.21 0 0 0 0 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.05 10 0.21
Total (E) 41.50 4.74 14.75 3.25 5.66 13.10 41.50 Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E) 246.60 9.97 10.22 10.44 56.61 43.47 50.66 42.23 246.60
Page 59
CHAPTER – V :- Annual Action Plan
Name of Watershed :- Mau (Sikar-IV) Effective Project Area :- 1145.93 ha. Name of Grampanchyat :- Nathusar Project Cost :- 171.89 lacks Name of Block :- Shrimadhopu Name of District :- Sikar
Chapter V Annual Action Plan IWMP - Mau (Sikar-IV)
(B) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total
Unit Unit Cost
Quantity
Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Conservation measures for arable land Contour bund/ Field bunding With Waste weir ha 0.25 80 20 0 0 0 0 15 3.75 20 5 20 5 15 3.75 10 2.5 80 20 Earthen Structure with Waste No 0 16 19.1 0 0 0 0 3 3.6 4 4.76 5 5.95 3 3.6 1 1.19 16 19.1
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.) 1. Geographical Area 1433 2. Treatable Area 1145.93 3. Arable land 1002.63 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 114.75 (B) Un- Irrigated 887.88 4. Govt. land 430.37 (A) Pasture land 143.30 (B) Govt. land treatable
Page 60
weir/ Water Harvesting Structure Bank Stabilisation/ Peripheral Bund Rm
Conservation measures for non arable land Pasture Development (Overseeiding) ha 0.021 60 1.26 0 0 0 0 20 0.42 20 0.42 20 0.42 0 0 0 0 60 1.26
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.) 1. Geographical Area 2025 2. Treatable Area 1261.30 3. Arable land 1080.60 (A) Irrigated by Tubewell 113.79 (B) Un- Irrigated 926.81 4. Govt. land 193.65 (A) Pasture land 220.71 (B) Govt. land treatable
Total (E) 32.50 13.11 3.25 5.66 5.74 4.74 32.50 Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E) 221.69 5.13 13.41 39.81 48.49 50.48 37.26 27.11 221.69
Page 67
CHAPTER – VI EXPECTED OUT COMES 1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No. Item Unit of measurement Pre-project Status Expected Post-
project Status Remarks
1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)
Meters
2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated
No.
3 Quality of drinking water Description Partial potable Potable 4 Availability of drinking water Description sufficient except summer increase in availability 5 Change in irrigated Area Ha 729.18 749.20 6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description 7 Area under agricultural crop Ha 4684.04 4704.06 I Area under single crop Ha 3954.86 - Ii Area under double crop Ha 729.18 749.20 Iii Area under multiple crop Ha - 20.00 8 Change in cultivated Area Ha - 20.00 9 yield of major crops of area
Yield of Bajra q/ha 4.84 15.00 Yield of Wheat q/ha 35.00 21.00 Yield of Methi q/ha 1.40 8.00 Yield of Mustard q/ha 16.00 20.00
10 production of major crops of area
Production of Bajra ton 1369.00 1415.00 Production of Wheat ton 1088.00 1200.00 Production of Methi ton 50.00 56.00 Production of Mustard ton 1600.00 1800.00
11 Area under vegetation Ha - - 12 Area under horticulture Ha 3.00 27.00 13 Area under fuel Ha - - 14 Area under Fodder Ha 290.00 440.00 15 Fodder production Q 24890.00 4000.00 16 Milk production Litres/day 3500.00 4000.00 17 SHGs Active No. 12.00 50.00 18 No. of livelihoods No. 3.00 5.00 19 Income Rs.in la - - 20 Migration No. 475.00 300.00 21 SHG Federations formed No. - -
Page 68
Critical Assumption
• No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters
• Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.
• There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before
irreversible damage is done.
• Adverse market conditions do not persist long.
• Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed
particularly in the rural areas.
• Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely
and appropriate technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever required.
• The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs
and feedback from participants.
• The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District
and State level Implementing Agencies
Means of Verification of indicators
• Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning,
mid-term and end of the project period
• Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.