power and water corporation WASTEWATER TREATMENT, REUSE AND DISCHARGE REPORT 2006
power and water corporation
WASTEWATER TREATMENT,REUSE AND DISCHARGE REPORT 2006
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 1
Contents
From the Managing Director .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4
Section 1: Commitment to wastewater treatment, environmental protection and recycled water quality ............................................... 5
Section 2: Assessing the sewage treatment system .............................................................................................................................................6Why we treat sewage ................................................................................................................................................................................................................6How we treat sewage ................................................................................................................................................................................................................6How we assess the sewage treatment system .................................................................................................................................................................8Our major treatment facilities ................................................................................................................................................................................................8Sewage treatment plant capacity ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Section 3: Proactive strategies for managing wastewater and controlling recycled water quality ..............................................................11Bulk and trade waste management .................................................................................................................................................................................... 11Infl ow and infi ltration management................................................................................................................................................................................... 11Sewer overfl ow management plan (abatement) ............................................................................................................................................................ 11Buffer zones ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12Darwin Sewerage Strategy......................................................................................................................................................................................................12Alice Springs Soil Aquifer Treatment ....................................................................................................................................................................................12Recycled water trials at Marrara ............................................................................................................................................................................................13
Section 4: Operational procedures and process control ......................................................................................................................................14Operational procedures ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14Operational monitoring and process control .................................................................................................................................................................. 14Audits and management practices ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Section 5: Verifying wastewater and recycled water quality ............................................................................................................................. 15Wastewater quality monitoring program..........................................................................................................................................................................15Microbiological monitoring (assessment) .........................................................................................................................................................................15Physical and chemical monitoring (assessment) ........................................................................................................................................................... 18Waste discharge licence monitoring summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 19
Section 6: Incident reporting and response .......................................................................................................................................................... 21Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................21Recorded incidents – sewerage systems ............................................................................................................................................................................21Recorded incidents – treatment system (facility) ............................................................................................................................................................21Recorded incidents – odour complaints .............................................................................................................................................................................24Recorded incidents – sewer overfl ows ...............................................................................................................................................................................24
Section 7: Employee awareness and training ...................................................................................................................................................... 25Awareness opportunities and strategies ..........................................................................................................................................................................25Training .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................25
Section 8: Community engagement and awareness ......................................................................................................................................... 26Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26Darwin Sewerage Strategy.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26Water recycling in the Alice .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26Darwin Harbour Regional Plan of Management ........................................................................................................................................................... 26Bird watching ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Section 9: Supporting research and development ..............................................................................................................................................27Chemical sedimentation trials at Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant ............................................................................................................27Hydrodynamic and dispersion modelling of municipal effl uent discharged into Darwin Harbour .............................................................27
power and water corporation2
Contents
Section 10: Documentation and reporting ........................................................................................................................................................... 28Wastewater quality database ...............................................................................................................................................................................................28Documentation ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................28Reporting ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................28
Section 11: Evaluation and audit ............................................................................................................................................................................. 28
Section 12: Review and continual improvement ................................................................................................................................................. 29Review .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29Improvement ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29
References .................................................................................................................................................................................................................30
Appendices ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31
Appendix 1:Wastewater treatment performance (assessment) ........................................................................................................................ 31A1.1: Wastewater stabilisation pond (WSP) performance evaluation methodology ........................................................................................31A1.2: Monthly sewage infl ows (ML) for North Region (2005-2006) ......................................................................................................................32A1.3 Monthly sewage infl ows (ML) for South Region (2005-2006) ...................................................................................................................... 33A1.4: Design details for wastewater stabilisation ponds in North Region19 ........................................................................................................34A1.5: Design details for wastewater stabilisation ponds in South Region20 ........................................................................................................36A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North Region ....................................................................................................................................... 37A1.7: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in South Region .......................................................................................................................................43A1.8: Performance assessment of wastewater stabilisation ponds against design criteria. .........................................................................45A1.9: Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant performance ...................................................................................................................................... 46A1.10: Yulara Wastewater Treatment Plant performance ............................................................................................................................................47
Appendix 2: Wastewater Discharge Assessment ................................................................................................................................................48A2.1: Wastewater discharge licence evaluation and data presentation .............................................................................................................. 48A2.2: Mass loading discharge data for Berrimah, Katherine, Larrakeyah, Leanyer/Sanderson, Ludmilla and Palmerston Wastewater Treatment Plants ............................................................................................................................... 50A2.3: Discharge concentration and mass loading data for Alice Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant. .................................................. 53A2.4: Summary of the effl uent discharge performance and discharge compliance for Alice Springs ......................................................55A2.5: Comparative representation of discharge water quality. .............................................................................................................................. 56
Appendix 3: Recycled water .................................................................................................................................................................................... 76A3.1: Recycled water site description ................................................................................................................................................................................76A3.2: Recycled water quality assessment methodology and criteria .....................................................................................................................78A3.3: Extract from Guidelines for the use of reclaimed water applicable to uses practised in the Northern Territory ..........................79
Urban non-potable ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 79Urban non-potable ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 79Agricultural ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 79Agricultural ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................80Industrial ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................80
A3.4: General guidelines for salinity of irrigation water............................................................................................................................................. 81A3.4: Recycled water usage (kL) ...........................................................................................................................................................................................82A3.5: Recycled water quality .................................................................................................................................................................................................83A3.6: Salinity classes of recycled water ............................................................................................................................................................................ 84
Appendix 4: Rainfall ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 85
List of fi gures ............................................................................................................................................................................................................86
List of tables ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................86
Abbreviation and defi nitions (glossary) ...............................................................................................................................................................86
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 3
I am pleased to introduce Power and Water’s 2006 Wastewater Treatment, Reuse and Discharge Report. This report summarises our performance and achievements in 2005-2006, evaluates our wastewater discharges and water recycling initiatives and assesses the quality of recycled water.
We are proud of our achievements to date, but we continue to improve the way we manage the wastewater generated by Territorians. Increasing environmental pressures mean we are continually challenged to meet more stringent environmental compliance. We have a responsibility to manage our water resources in a sustainable manner to ensure there is suffi cient water and its quality is protected.
While we are committed to conserving resources and protecting the environment through using recycled water, this can only occur if it is done in a safe manner. Protection of public health and safety is and must remain our fi rst priority.
Our trade waste management system ensures that industrial wastewater discharged to our sewers does not limit our opportunities for water recycling, or interfere with our treatment processes or cause environmental harm when we discharge to the environment.
New national guidelines for recycled water were released during the preparation of this report. The principles of these guidelines were considered when preparing this report.
I hope you fi nd this report of interest and value.
From the Managing Director
Kim WoodManaging Director
power and water corporation4
Every community in the Northern Territory generates sewage. It can come from people’s houses, institutions, commercial premises and industrial businesses and it includes human waste fl ushed down toilets, food scraps washed down sinks, and the water from washing machines, bathtubs, and businesses. Most of the sewage in the Northern Territory is generated by domestic properties. However an increasing amount of sewage is being generated by industry as a result of continued economic development in the Northern Territory. During the Wet Season, infi ltration of rainwater and groundwater increases the volume of sewage.
The sewerage system is part of the urban water cycle. Water is collected from the natural water cycle and used for drinking, cooking, and fl ushing away unwanted wastes. The resulting sewage is collected and treated before either being discharged back to the environment or being reused. At some places the water is allowed to evaporate into the atmosphere.
Power and Water Corporation plays an important role in the urban water cycle. We harvest unused water from the natural water cycle, distribute it to the community, collect the used water and ensure adequate treatment is applied before either returning the water to the natural water cycle or reusing it.
This report focuses on the sewage component of the urban water cycle. It also fulfi ls a requirement of our Waste Discharge Licences issued under the Northern Territory Water Act (2004) to prepare an annual report to present information about monitoring and compliance assessment related to environmental impacts that discharged wastewater may cause, and an assessment of water recycling schemes.
This report assesses the wastewater quality information from July 2005 to June 2006 and subsequently the information is assessed against the requirements of the licences at that time.
Introduction
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 5
Power and Water aims to provide a safe and reliable sewage collection network, operate effi cient treatment facilities, release environmentally sound discharges and operate sustainable recycled water systems. Our Customer Contract, our Wastewater Management Policy and our Reclaimed Water Policy outline this commitment. A copy of the Customer Contract is available at any Power and Water offi ce or atwww.powerwater.com.au. We place a high value on protecting and enhancing public health and the environment. Power and Water undertakes to:
• Provide wastewater services appropriate to the environment in which the community is located, to standards in accordance with parameters set by appropriate guidelines.
• Develop a wastewater monitoring program in accordance with the requirements of wastewater discharge licences, monitor the quality of wastewater in accordance with the agreed program, and report annually to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) program.
• Implement and maintain a wastewater quality management system, consistent with the requirements of relevant national guidelines, to minimise risks to public health and the environment at all points along the collection chain from customer to the environment.
• Ensure that all managers, employees and contractors involved in the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater understand and implement the wastewater management system.
• Provide a public annual report outlining trade waste management, wastewater treatment effi ciency, reclaimed water quality and wastewater discharge into the environment.
• Develop and maintain a wastewater incident and customer complaint register to benchmark performance and to help identify and resolve wastewater issues.
• Report pollution events associated with wastewater discharges to the environment to the EPA.
• Participate in cooperative research projects with external agencies to identify issues and research priorities for wastewater management in regional and rural areas.
• Annually assess performance with respect to this policy, review our practices in conjunction with the EPA and consult with the community on wastewater management issues requiring attention.
Power and Water promotes the safe, effi cient and environmentally sustainable use of reclaimed water through our Reclaimed Water Policy. Under this policy:• All reclaimed water proposals are subject to the approval of
the Chief Health Offi cer of the Department of Health and Community Services (DHCS).
• The level of treatment, reclaimed water quality and monitoring program will be in line with the National Water Quality Management Strategy Guidelines for Sewerage Systems – Use of Reclaimed Water (2000).
• In conjunction with DHCS, Power and Water will continue to monitor research into the health risks associated with the use of reclaimed water, in particular the results of research associated with unrestricted and indirect potable reuse.
• Direct potable use of reclaimed water is not considered.• Indirect potable use of reclaimed water is considered
possible in the longer term, particularly where water supplies are based on non-renewable, groundwater resources. Any proposal for aquifer storage and recoveryof reclaimed water will be developed in accordancewith the Guidelines on the Quality of Stormwater and Treated Wastewater for Injection into Aquifers for Storage and Reuse – Urban Water Research Association ofAustralian (1996).
• The community will be informed and supportive of any reclaimed water scheme.
• Preference will be given to developing reclaimed water systems that have the potential to result in new industries and jobs for the local community, followed by those that have social benefi ts such as irrigating sporting fi elds.
• Use of reclaimed water is an important component of the total water cycle and will be considered as part of the hydrological cycle.
• Reclaimed water applications may be considered, independently of commercial viability, where signifi cant health, social and environmental benefi ts can be realised through reducing effl uent discharges to the environment.
• Reducing per capita sewage fl ows and substituting reclaimed water for existing water supplies are integral to achieving sustainable water management.
• The supply of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes will require the Department of Planning and Infrastructure and the Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts to approve a land and water management plan that addresses salinity, sodicity, nutrient management and product safety.
Section 1: Commitment to wastewater treatment, environmental protection and recycled water quality
power and water corporation6
• Implementation of reclaimed water projects will be individually assessed on a commercial basis.
• Preference will be given to customers who can provide an economically and environmentally sustainable demand and be willing to pay for the service.
• Reclaimed water will be supplied at a cost that refl ects the costs in supply. The greater the level of treatment above that required for safe discharge to the environment, the higher the cost of reclaimed water.
• Power and Water will continue to investigate commercial options to overcome constraints to market development of reclaimed water.
• Over time, all existing reclaimed water agreements will be standardised and made consistent with the requirements of the Water Supply and Sewerage Services Act (2000).
• A risk management strategy will be developed for Power and Water’s reclaimed water schemes incorporating product monitoring and quality assurance procedures, as well as monitoring customers’ compliance with reclaimed water controls in accordance with the National Water Quality Management Strategy Guidelines for Sewerage Systems – Use of Reclaimed Water (2000).
• Diversity of reclaimed water use will be pursued as an essential element of minimising commercial risk.
A number of government departments are closely involved with managing wastewater and reusing reclaimed water, working with Power and Water to protect the environment and public health:• DHCS has a key role in providing direction and safeguards
for wastewater quality for reclaimed water schemes as well as public health issues relating to environmental discharges.
• The Northern Territory Environment Protection Agency program grants and controls Waste Discharge Licences and has a role in bulk and trade waste disposal.
• The Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines provides laboratory analytical services for wastewater and reclaimed water testing in Darwin and Alice Springs.
Section 2: Assessing the sewage treatment system
Why we treat sewageThe purpose of treating sewage is to protect public health and the environment. This is carried out in a manner that fi ts with environmental, economical and social sustainability.
If the sewage is inadequately treated, it may contain:• Organic matter that decomposes, generating foul odours
and lowering the oxygen levels available to animals and plants living in the water
• Numerous pathogenic organisms that cause disease in humans and animals
• Nutrients that stimulate the growth of aquatic plants• Substances that are toxic to plants and creatures living in
the aquatic environment• Substances that restrict certain water recycling practices.The sewage treatment system consists of a collection network of pipes that separate the waste from its source to deliver the sewage to the treatment facility, after which it is either reused or discharged to the environment.
How we treat sewagePower and Water treats sewage throughout the Northern Territory using mostly pond treatment technology or waste stabilisation ponds (WSPs). These are open ponds that use a host of complex, diverse and interrelated natural biological processes to treat the sewage. A combination of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria purifi es the sewage. What sets WSPs apart from other treatment technologies is the involvement of algae that use photosynthesis to generate oxygen. Pond systems are more effi cient in the tropics than in temperate regions and are therefore ideally suited to the Northern Territory. Other treatment processes used in the NT include chemically assisted sedimentation (CAS), dissolved air fl otation (DAF), microfi ltration and activated sludge.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 7Ta
ble
2.1: T
ypes
of t
reat
men
t pro
cess
es a
nd d
ischa
rge
tech
niqu
es u
sed
in th
e No
rthe
rn Te
rrito
ry.
lo
ca
tio
nin
flo
w
(ml/y
ear)1
tr
ea
tm
en
t
pr
oc
es
s2
dis
ch
ar
ge
to
re
us
e a
pp
lic
atio
n
da
rw
in
ha
rb
ou
r
estu
ar
yf
re
sh
wa
te
r
bo
dy
3
ev
ap
or
atio
nir
rig
atio
no
n-s
ite
pr
oc
es
s w
ate
r
Adel
aide
Riv
erN
DW
SP3
Alice
Sprin
gs27
60W
SP
Batc
helo
rN
DW
SP
Berri
mah
1834
WSP
Borro
lool
aN
DW
SP
Hum
pty D
oo54
.1W
SP
Kath
erin
e95
4W
SP3
King
s Can
yon
69.9
WSP
Larra
keya
h12
00Pr
imar
y m
acer
atio
n
Lean
yer/
Sand
erso
n61
30W
SP
Ludm
illa
4750
CAS5
Nort
hlak
es22
8DA
F6
+ M
icrofi
ltra
tion
+ Ch
lorin
atio
n
Palm
erst
on25
60W
SP
Pine
Cre
ek40
.9W
SP
Tenn
ant C
reek
262
WSP
Yula
ra25
5Ac
tivat
ed sl
udge
1 ND
– No
data
2 WSP
– W
aste
stab
ilisa
tion
pond
3 Disc
harg
e occ
urs o
nly d
urin
g Wet
Seas
on.
4 Bet
wee
n Se
ptem
ber 2
005 a
nd M
ay 20
06 n
o in
fl ow
dat
a w
as co
llect
ed fr
om B
errim
ah W
SPs b
ecau
se th
e fl o
w m
eter
was
faul
ty. M
onth
ly fl
ows w
ere e
stim
ated
usin
g da
ta fr
om th
e th
ree p
revi
ous y
ears
for e
ach
mon
th.
5 CAS
– Ch
emica
lly a
ssist
ed se
dim
enta
tion
6 DAF
– Di
ssol
ved
air fl
ota
tion
power and water corporation8
How we assess the sewage treatment systemTo protect public health and the environment it is necessary to know:• The constituents of concern in the sewage• The impacts these constituents have when discharged to
the environment• The transformations and long-term fate of these
constituents in treatment processes• Treatment methods that can be used to remove or modify
the constituents found in sewage• Methods for benefi cial water recycling of the treated water.The physical, chemical and biological nature of the sewage is determined through Power and Water’s water quality monitoring program (Power and Water 2006b). Many of these measurements are interrelated. We assess process performance and reliability of each treatment facility using the knowledge gained from the water quality monitoring program and measured infl ows and outfl ows. This information is also essential in the design and operation of the treatment facilities. Finally an understanding of the treated water quality is essential to assess the degree of pollution or contamination.
Our major treatment facilities
Adelaide RiverSewage from the town of Adelaide River is treated in a three-pond system. Because of the small infl ow and the high evaporation there is little discharge. These ponds occasionally discharge only during high rainfall.
Alice SpringsSewage from Alice Springs is treated in four sets of ponds, each built at different times. The oldest system lies in the western end of the Commonage. Newer ponds were constructed progressively on the west side of the original pond site.
Effl uent is discharged through evaporation, irrigation at a tree farm and at Blatherskite Park. Excess effl uent overfl ows to Ilparpa Swamp. Overfl ow to Ilparpa Swamp will be signifi cantly reduced when the soil aquifer treatment and storage system is commissioned in late 2007.
BatchelorSewage from the town of Batchelor is treated in a four-pond system. Because of the storage capacity of the ponds and high evaporation rates, no discharge occurs to the environment.
BerrimahThe Berrimah WSPs are a small set of three ponds running in series. Domestic sewage from the suburb of Berrimah and industrial wastewater from the Darwin Business Park is treated here. Discharge is to an estuary.
BorroloolaSewage from the town of Borroloola is treated in a set of three ponds. The effl uent is used to irrigate pasture on site or is allowed to evaporate.
Humpty DooThe Humpty Doo WSPs treat sewage from Humpty Doo. The treated effl uent is sprayed to land near to the ponds.
KatherineSewage from Katherine is treated in a set of nine ponds. The treated water is discharged either to land through irrigation or to the Katherine River. No effl uent is discharged into the Katherine River during the Dry. Discharge to the river occurs only during the Wet Season when it can be mixed with fl oodwaters. The bacteriological quality of the treated water is excellent because the water can remain in the fi nal ponds for extended times. The capacity of these ponds to treat more sewage will be increased through future pond and irrigation extension schemes.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 9
Kings CanyonA four-pond set of WSPs at Kings Canyon treat all the sewage from the Kings Canyon Resort and surrounding community. The treated water is used to irrigate a tree lot on the site. No effl uent is discharged outside the facility.
Leanyer SandersonThe Leanyer Sanderson WSPs are the largest set of ponds in the Northern Territory. They treat most of the sewage from the northern suburbs of Darwin. Two sets of fi ve ponds each operate in parallel. Some of the treated water is pumped to Northlakes where, after more advanced treatment, it is used to irrigate the Darwin Golf Course and the Marrara sporting ovals. The remaining treated water is discharge into the estuary of Buffalo Creek.
LudmillaLudmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant treats sewage coming from Nightcliff, Winnellie and most of the inner city. The treatment process includes grit removal and solids screening, chlorination, and chemical assisted sedimentation. A furnace incinerates the waste solids removed during the treatment process. The furnace also burns sewage gases to minimise odours. The treated water is discharged via a pipeline to Darwin Harbour.
LarrakeyahThe sewage from the CBD and the suburb of Larrakeyah is macerated; that is, larger solids are broken down, and discharged at a deepwater outfall into Darwin Harbour.
The Darwin Sewerage Strategy includes plans to decommission this outfall and transfer the sewage from this catchment to another treatment facility.
NorthlakesThe Northlakes Water Reclamation Plant takes water from the Leanyer Sanderson WSPs for further treatment by more advanced technologies. Chemicals are added to separate solids, mostly algae, from the water. Dissolved air is used to fl oat the solids to the surface of the water where they are removed. Micro-fi ltration then removes fi ne particles to produce water as clear as tap water. The water is used to irrigate the Darwin Golf Course and Marrara sporting ovals.
PalmerstonPalmerston WSPs treat all the sewage from the city of Palmerston. This site also receives some trade waste, mostly grease trap waste, and much of the septic tank waste from the rural and un-sewered areas. A set of fi ve ponds operating in series treats this waste before discharge to the estuary. An additional small pond was constructed to receive and pre-treat the trade waste before transfer to the main ponds.
Pine CreekSewage from Pine Creek is treated in a three-pond set. The water left over after evaporation is discharged only during high rainfall into the nearby creek.
Tennant CreekTennant Creek’s sewage is treated in a set of multiple ponds. All the water evaporates and consequently no effl uent is discharged from the site.
YularaThe Yulara activated sludge plant treats the sewage from the Ayers Rock Resort complex as well as the town. The plant uses mechanical aeration (activated sludge process) to degrade organic matter and to purify the sewage. Effl uent from this plant is polished in a set of ponds and is then used to irrigate an adjacent tree lot. No effl uent is discharged off the site.
power and water corporation10
f igure 2.1: hydraulic and organic loading of design capacity for wsps
Sewage treatment plant capacityThe treatment capacity of each facility is determined by comparing the actual measured infl ows against the design infl ow. The infl ow is assessed by organic strength (that is, the amount of organic material present in the sewage usually measured as the biochemical oxygen demand or BOD5) and the volume or hydraulic capacity.
The treatment capacity of the major WSPs is shown in Figure 2.1. An infl ow or organic load at 100 per cent signifi es a plant that is operating at or above its design capacity. Loading capacities for Ludmilla and Yulara treatment plants are not shown here. Their treatment capability is discussed in more detail in Appendices 1.6 and 1.7.
Figure 2.1 shows that the Humpty Doo ponds are not large enough to meet the minimum detention time of 20 days and are consequently hydraulically overloaded. Additional ponds are needed to allow the required retention time to reduce pathogens to an acceptable level. Power and Water is planning to build additional ponds at this site and is undertaking other measures to improve the performance of the ponds.
Kings Canyon WSPs are operating near their hydraulic and organic design capacities. Power and Water is planning to build additional ponds at this site as well.
Katherine, Leanyer and Sanderson WSPs are approaching the design capacity and will need upgrading if population projections predict signifi cant growth.
No data was available for Borroloola, Pine Creek, Adelaide River and Batchelor WSPs during this period because there were no fl ow instruments installed or instruments were faulty.
The fl ow meters at Tennant Creek WSPs were not read during this period. Work procedures have since been changed to incorporate meter readings.
More details on the performance of each treatment facility are provided in Appendix 1.
Perc
enta
ge (%
)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 11
Power and Water uses several strategies to minimise environmental damage and to protect public health. They include:• Managing bulk and trade waste to control what is put in
our sewers• Managing infl ow and infi ltration to control excess
sewer fl ows• Using overfl ow management plans to control where and
how sewer overfl ow may occur• Minimising the impacts of odours and aerosol
emission from treatment plants through buffer zones around facilities
• Implementing the Darwin Sewerage Strategy• Treating wastewater through the Alice Springs Soil Aquifer
Treatment initiative• Trialling recycled water management programs.
Bulk and trade waste managementPower and Water has entered into Bulk Wastewater Agreements with a number of Northern Territory waste management companies. Under the agreements, the companies collect wastes such as grease trap waste, septic tank waste and shipping wastewater for discharge to approved treatment plants across all regions of the Territory. This ensures they are disposed of correctly and not discharged untreated to the environment. The volume of waste received has doubled over the past two years. This indicates that the stringent maintenance procedures for businesses generating trade waste are working effectively.
Under the Trade Waste Management System (TWMS), over 600 compliant businesses have now been issued with a Trade Waste Discharge Permit. A further 100 businesses have completed applications to discharge trade waste to sewer. These businesses will be issued with permits when their trade waste discharge complies with the TWMS. Trade Waste Offi cers will continue to work with and assist all businesses to achieve compliance.
The permits specify the maintenance frequency for the businesses’ pre-treatment equipment. Recording procedures implemented under the Bulk Wastewater Agreements allow Power and Water to ensure maintenance is undertaken as specifi ed.
The discharge of food scraps and waste cooking oil to sewer is overloading pre-treatment equipment and placing an additional unacceptable load on the sewerage system. Power and Water will initiate an information campaign including
personal contact and brochures to try to reduce the volume of unapproved waste products discharged to sewer.
Power and Water has recently negotiated an agreement with a major customer to accept both bulk wastewater and trade waste from the new biodiesel plant at East Arm. The wastewater will be stringently monitored to ensure compliance with the discharge criteria in the agreement. This will ensure wastewater discharged to the environment complies with licence conditions.
Infl ow and infi ltration managementDuring heavy rainfall the volume of wastewater fl owing through the sewers can increase greatly.
Every year Power and Water runs an extensive advertising campaign to inform the public not to direct rainwater from downpipes or properties into overfl ow relief gullies. Because this can overload the sewerage system and cause overfl ows into other properties, we regularly undertake smoke testing to identify illegal connections.
Vegetation also has a strong impact on infl ow and infi ltration. Many exotic and native trees seek out the moisture in sewer pipes during the Dry Season. The roots can break pipe joints allowing infi ltration and causing blockages. Power and Water manages tree roots through herbicide and physical removal.
Sewer overfl ow management plan (abatement)Sewer blockages, sewer collapse, pump station failure or excessive infl ow and infi ltration cause overfl ows. Our ongoing sewer rehabilitation program spends around $2 million annually to ensure continued sewer integrity and to reduce stormwater and groundwater infi ltration. The program uses closed circuit TV to identify problem sewers and areas where repair is most needed.
Power and Water owns and operates about 60 per cent of the wastewater collection system. Because the remaining 40 per cent is within property boundaries, landowners are responsible for repairing and maintaining their sewer connections. This limits some of our ability to control infl ows. One component of our Trade Waste Management System is to reduce grease build-up (and thus blockages) and we try to manage trees and vegetation close to sewer pipes. Unfortunately, it is likely that sewer overfl ows will always occur at some time. We try to manage overfl ows so they occur where they will cause minimal impact, and we respond to any incident as quickly as we can.
Section 3: Proactive strategies for managing wastewater and controlling recycled water quality
power and water corporation12
Buffer zonesA buffer zone is an area of land around a sewage treatment facility, disposal or transfer facility such as a pumping station that remains free of development. Buffer zones are designated to:• Minimise nuisance odours and noise in built-up
residential areas• Minimise people’s exposure to wastewater aerosols
generated during irrigation• Reduce the visual impact on the environment• Protect Power and Water interests by restricting
development close to sewage facilities.
Buffer zones depend on the size and type of the facility.
Power and Water draft guidelines (Power and Water 2006c) stipulate the minimum buffer zones around sewage treatment works, areas of treated effl uent reuse and sewerage pumping stations in the Northern Territory.
Darwin Sewerage StrategyThe Darwin Sewerage Strategy was fi rst developed in 1994 focusing on the central Darwin area including the CBD, Parap, Fannie Bay, Ludmilla and Stuart Park areas. It aims to:• Operate a waste treatment and disposal network that
conforms to nationally accepted environmental standards and accepted best practice
• Increase sewer capacity to handle continued population and industrial growth
• Reduce system overfl ows during high rainfall• Reduce the impact of effl uent discharges to Darwin Harbour• Generate increased opportunities for effl uent reuse.
In 1994, the main feature of the strategy was to close the Larrakeyah outfall and to upgrade Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant to treat the diverted sewage fl ows, with much of the treated effl uent used to irrigate open space in the inner city.
The strategy has progressively been implemented and is currently going through a major review. An estimated $14 million of capital works has been spent to upgrade the sewer reticulation system in the CBD, Frances Bay and Parap as well as progressive upgrade of Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant to improve safety and reduce odours. The major works remaining to close down the Larrakeyah outfall include the fi nal diversion of the sewage from Larrakeyah to Ludmilla and upgrade of the treatment facility at Ludmilla. This work will require a minimum of fi ve years to complete.
Since development of the strategy over 10 years ago, several economic, environmental and engineering issues have been identifi ed, including:• The strategy did not establish a well-defi ned basis to
determine the quality or quantity of an acceptable discharge. In addition water quality objectives, associated with declared benefi cial uses, have not been set for Darwin Harbour.
• There were several technical, land administration issues and community objections associated with the proposed diversion tunnel.
• Identifi cation of poor foundation conditions at Ludmilla has escalated costs for new structures.
• Odours need to be captured at the Ludmilla facility so nearby residents do not object.
• The estimated cost of the project now exceeds two and half times the original estimates.
Due to these factors several alternative options are now being considered to manage the diverted sewage that will result from closing the Larrakeyah outfall.
Alice Springs Soil Aquifer TreatmentEffl uent regularly discharges from the Alice Springs WSPs into the Ilparpa Swamp, changing it from an ephemeral to a permanent water body. The nutrient rich effl uent has contributed to the growth of non-native grasses and reeds in the swamp, degrading the original Coolabah swamp, as well as providing a habitat for mosquitoes. Consequently, in late 2005, Power and Water implemented a pulse discharge regime to the swamp to disrupt the mosquitoes breeding cycle. Mosquito numbers have dropped dramatically and remain low.
To eliminate the dry weather effl uent discharges from the treatment ponds to the swamp, Power and Water will implement the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) scheme by December 2007. The scheme incorporates a dissolved air fl otation and fi ltration plant to further improve the quality of the water taken from the ponds, making it suitable for irrigation in horticulture. The reclaimed water will then be transported 8km via an existing pipeline for SAT at the Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI). The water will be stored underground and subsequently used to irrigate fruits, vegetables, fl owers and ornamental plants.
Once the SAT is commissioned and fully operational, no discharge is expected except possibly during wet weather.
About half of the total fl ow into the treatment ponds is lost to seepage from the unlined treatment ponds and channels. This has created a groundwater mound that lies under the
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 13
sewage ponds and the irrigated tree plantation. The elevated groundwater levels have raised the water table in the swamp, compounding the effects of the surface discharge. Power and Water has developed a groundwater monitoring plan as required by Waste Discharge Licence to specifi cally determine the impact of the sewage treatment system and reuse activities on groundwater levels and quality.
Recycled water trials at MarraraPower and Water operates the Northlakes Water Reuse Scheme in Darwin to supply recycled water. The Marrara Sporting Complex was supplied with secondary treated effl uent from the Leanyer Sanderson Waste Stabilisation Ponds to irrigate sports fi elds. The Darwin Golf Course is irrigated with micro-fi ltered recycled water from the Northlakes Treatment Plant. In September 2005 Power and Water conducted a trial to determine if it was feasible to supply micro-fi ltered recycled water to both the Darwin Golf Course and the Marrara Sporting Complex. The trial found that:• The treatment plant does not have the capacity to supply
additional demand from Marrara• Water from the drinking water system is required to
supplement 28 per cent of the recycled water supply• The micro-fi ltered water costs $0.74/kL to deliver to Marrara,
similar to the cost of the drinking water supply.
Power and Water is currently reviewing its options for supplying irrigation water to the Marrara Sports Complex without the need to top up the supply from the drinking water system. We are also reviewing our price for the supply of the recycled water.
essential services operators.
power and water corporation14
Section 4: Operational procedures and process control
Operational proceduresPower and Water continually develops and reviews standard operating procedures and guidelines so operators have the tools and knowledge they need to effectively run wastewater collection and treatment systems. Our standard operating procedures include:• Pollution event reporting and response• Wastewater quality sampling and testing• Wastewater stabilisation pond design and operation• Specifi c operating procedures for individual
treatment plants.
Power and Water is aiming to implement an integrated management system in line with the three recognised International and Australian Standards for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (AS/NZ 4801), Environmental Management Standards (AS/NZ 14000)7, and Quality of Products and Services (ISO 9000). It is designed to focus on the process of continuous improvement. During 2005-2006 we reviewed our procedures so that the format is compatible with requirements8.
Operational monitoring and process controlOur aim is to continually improve all aspects of treatment plant and collection system monitoring and process control. Many of the more complicated treatment systems have built-in process control systems that monitor and provide real-time feedback on chemical and hydraulic processes and provide alarms when necessary. In most cases this information is collected remotely so operators can assess the problem from a central location.
Power and Water has been developing sewerage system models throughout the Northern Territory to enhance planning and decision-making. Sound models are necessary to assess alternative strategies, for example how to divert fl ows away from the Larrakeyah outfall to the Ludmilla treatment plant in Darwin. Models are also used to assess the impact of new building developments on operating sewerage systems, and to determine if upgrades are required.
Audits and management practicesPower and Water supports the use of recycled water and takes its responsibility seriously when it comes to safety and customer compliance with any restrictions on its reuse. Power and Water undertakes system audits to ensure that the management of all reclaimed water schemes complies with specifi c requirements.
Power and Water has produced a customer information handout called Applying reclaimed water for irrigation schemes: Management and safeguards, which outlines the safeguards and controls that a customer must implement to prevent public exposure to pathogens (disease-causing microorganisms) and other contaminants. Controls include restricting public access, putting in place buffer distances, using a suitable irrigation method, ensuring properplumbing (using lilac coloured coded pipe for transporting recycled water) and putting up the appropriate signage(as shown below).
7 ISO 14001 specifi es the requirements for an Environmental Management System (EMS), providing a framework for an organisation to identify and manage the environmental impact of its activities, products and services, and to improve its environmental performance continually.
8 ISO 9001:2000 specifi es requirements for a quality management system for any organisation that needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements and aims to enhance customer satisfaction. The standard is used for certifi cation/registration and contractual purposes by organisation seeking recognition of their quality management system.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 15
Wastewater quality monitoring programPower and Water has developed a wastewater quality monitoring program (Power and Water 2006b) to verify the performance of current wastewater quality management strategies. The need for establishing a regular monitoring program is both regulatory and process driven and is based on:
• Guidelines for the Use of Reclaimed Water (National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000a)
• Waste Discharge Licences issued by the Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts (EPA program) under the Water Act (2004)
• National Pollution Inventory reporting requirements• Power and Water’s treatment performance assessment
criteria (self assessment).The program is reviewed annually and revised as required.
Microbiological monitoring (assessment)Microbiological monitoring is undertaken to check for potential pathogenic or disease-causing organisms. It is recognised that the major risk to people using recycled water is infection from microorganisms. Sewage contains many potentially infectious microorganisms derived from humans.
The coliform group of microorganisms consists of several genera of bacteria found in the gut of animals. They are discharged in high numbers in human and animal faeces.
These coliforms are generally harmless. Because there are a lot more coliforms in human faeces than pathogens, they are useful as an indicator of faecal contamination in water. They are one of the best indicators of water treatment effi ciency and are consequently very useful for assessing the safety of recycled water.
Escherichia coli (or E.coli) is one of the main members of the faecal coliform group of bacteria living in the lower intestine of mammals. E.coli is more specifi c to human sources of contamination and is preferred when assessing faecal contamination.
E.coli is reported as colony forming units (cfu) per 100 mL of water.
The Guidelines for the Use of Reclaimed Water (National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000a) addresses how to recycle effl uent coming from municipal sewage treatment facilities. They outline the different applications of water recycling, the level of treatment required, the recycled water quality required for each application, the water monitoring that should be put in place and the safeguards and controls.
In 2005-2006, Power and Water provided about 1750 million litres of recycled water, or about 10.9 per cent of the effl uent generated at major sewage treatment facilities in the Northern Territory. Table 5.1 summarises where we supplied recycled water and how it was used.
Section 5: Verifying wastewater and recycled water quality
scheme application recycled water type9
volume
recycled (mL)
Northlakes Darwin Golf Course Municipal with uncontrolled public access 228
Marrara Marrara sports ovals Municipal with controlled public access 99
Humpty Doo Natural vegetation Agriculture: Non-food crops 36
Ludmilla In-plant processes Industrial: Open system with human contact possible <110
Pine Creek Sports oval & rail corridor Municipal with controlled public access 011
Katherine Cattle feedlot Agriculture food production pasture and fodderfor cattle.
153
Blatherskite Park Open space & sports ovals Municipal with controlled public access 1070
Alice Springs Tree lot Agriculture: Non-human food chain 150
Kings Canyon Tree lot Agriculture: Non-human food chain 7
Yulara Tree Lot Tree lot Agriculture: Non-human food chain 012
Table 5.1 Summary of recycled schemes in the Northern Territory
9 As described by the Guidelines for Reclaimed Water (National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000a)10 Only a small amount of water is now recycled in processes at Ludmilla treatment plant following discontinued use of the furnace to burn sludge.11 Scheme has been closed down12 Yulara scheme discontinued after fi re destroyed the tree lot.
power and water corporation16
f igure 5.1: median e.coli values in recycled water used with controlled public access
Appendix 3 provides more detail about each scheme in the Northern Territory.
Figures 5.1 and 5.2 show the median and 80th percentile of E.coli measured at all sites with controlled public access. Where the laboratory reported a value of <20 cfu/100mL, a value of one half the detection level was assumed as the shown value.
Because the water recycling facilities at Pine Creek need a signifi cant upgrade, no recycling is being undertaken until this occurs. However the water quality results are presented for reference purposes.
ccfu
/100
ml
f igure 5.2: 80th percentile e.coli in recycled water with controlled public access
ccfu
/100
ml
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 17
Except for the water being stored in the golf course pond at Northlakes, the recycled water used in applications with controlled public access is of acceptable quality. The water quality in the golf course is of marginal quality being at the guideline value. This water in the golf pond is further treated using dissolved air fl otation (DAF) and microfi ltration to produce water with very low E.coli levels. This water is used for irrigation and is shown as Darwin Northlakes (Filtered water).
Figures 5.3 and 5.4 show the median and 80th percentile of E.coli measured at water recycling sites where the water is used for non-human food chain agriculture irrigation.
f igure 5.3: median e.coli in recycled water used for non-human food crops
ccfu
/100
ml
f igure 5.4: 80th percentile e.coli in recycled water used for non-human food crops
ccfu
/100
ml
power and water corporation18
These fi gures show that the recycled water from Humpty Doo struggles to meet the guideline criterion for its intended use. Figure 2.1 shows that the ponds at Humpty Doo are hydraulically overloaded meaning that there is insuffi cient detention time in the ponds to effectively reduce the numbers of indicator organisms. Power and Water is currently undertaking investigations to improve the treatment. Options being considered include building additional ponds, and installing recirculation systems and aeration systems.
The previous report (Power and Water 2005) identifi ed that the recycled water used to irrigate the tree farm at Alice Springs was not complying with the Guidelines (National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000a). Modifi cations to operations of the facility seem to have improved the quality of the treated water.
The guidelines (National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000a) and the Department of Health and Community Services have recommended the frequency to monitor recycled water quality. Mostly suffi cient samples were collected (Table A3.5) but in some cases this target sampling frequency was not met. This was due to several reasons including:• No fl ows occur for some months in the Dry Season at
Humpty Doo• No samples were collected specifi cally from the recycled
scheme because the scheme was discontinued such as at Yulara and Pine Creek. However the water quality results from the treatment facilities are presented here for reference purposes
• Remote sites make it diffi cult at times to collect all samples and to send them to the laboratory in a timely fashion.
Physical and chemical monitoring (assessment)Various physical and chemical measurements are carried out on the wastewater, treated water and recycled water. These measurements are important because they provide an indication of the potential impact the wastewater may have on the environment through wastewater discharges. These measurements also allow us to predict and assess the effi ciency of the treatment processes as well as determining the impacts of recycled water on the health of plants and the structure of the soil.
Most physical and chemical measurements are recorded in milligrams per litre (mg/L).
The following sections provide a brief summary of the typical physical and chemical measurements that are carried out on the wastewater. Table 5.2 compares the typical composition of raw sewage in the Northern Territory with values reported in the literature.
Generally the sewage in the Northern Territory tends to be organically weaker than that reported in the literature. This is possibly due to several reasons including:
• Infi ltration of groundwater and stormwater into the sewer• People take more showers due to the warm climate. The
increased volume of shower wastewater contains less organic matter than toilet water
• Few trade waste generators such as food processors discharge their waste to the sewer.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5)The BOD5 determination measures the amount of oxygen needed by bacteria to consume organic matter in the water over fi ve days. This test allows us to predict the organic waste loading to the treatment plant and to evaluate the BOD-removal effi ciency for such treatment systems.
NutrientsNutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen are essential to the growth of all organisms, however excessive nutrients in natural waters may stimulate the excessive growth of photosynthetic plant and algae.
Phosphorus is usually measured as both the total and fi lterable (soluble) forms because the soluble form is most readily available to plants.
In wastewater the forms of nitrogen of greatest interest are nitrate, nitrite, ammonia and organic nitrogen. All these forms of nitrogen are biochemically interchangeable. During biological treatment processes ammonia and organic nitrogen are converted to nitrate and nitrite. These forms are readily available to plants. Biological sewage treatment processes, if the correct conditions are maintained, can convert the nitrate and nitrite to nitrogen gas, which is then lost to the atmosphere. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) is a measure of the ammonia and organic nitrogen. Organic nitrogen comes from proteins found in our food, which is the largest source of organic nitrogen.
Ammonia is very toxic to most aquatic animals.
Suspended solids (SS) and volatile suspended solids (VSS)Solids refer to matter suspended or dissolved in water or wastewater. The suspended solids are the portion of total solids retained by a fi lter. Volatile solids is the loss of weight when the suspended solids are ignited at 550°C. The determination of volatile solids is useful because it offers an approximation of the amount of organic matter present in the solid faction of sewage.
Algae are very common in waste stabilisation ponds and can contribute signifi cantly to the suspended solids.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 19
Total dissolved solids (TDS)Total dissolved solids is a measure of the amount of dissolved matter in the water. The dissolved solids in sewage come from the water supply, chemicals used in the home such as detergents, food and industrial trade waste discharge to the sewer. TDS is useful for assessing if the quality of the sewage changes. It can also be used to estimate the amount of salts in the water and is helpful for assessing if the treated water will affect the structure of soils or plant growth when used for irrigation.
measurement median
(minimum-maximum)
literature
BOD5 (mg/L) 110 (21 –635) 200 – 350
SS (mg/L) 210 (26 – 1400) 200 – 350
Ammonia (mg/L N) 32 (10 – 69) 24 – 53
Organic nitrogen (mg/L N) 12 (2 – 33) 12 – 27
TKN (mg/L N) 44 (15 – 87) 35 – 75
Total phosphorus (mg/L P) 8.9 (2.3 – 22.6) 8 – 25
pH 7.3 (6.8 – 8.0) 6.8 - 7.6
E.coli (cfu/100mL) 1.1 x 107 >106
Table 5.2 Typical composition of domestic sewage in the Northern Territory compared to the literature13
Waste discharge licence monitoring summaryThe Environment Protection Agency program issues Waste Discharge Licences under the Water Act (2004), which requires Power and Water to measure the quantity and quality of discharges. Power and Water has seven discharges as outlined in Table 5.3. New discharge licences were issued in October 2006. This report assesses information from July 2005 to June 2006 and consequently the information presented is assessed against the requirements of the licences at that time.
The discharge licences require Power and Water to regularly measure the concentration of each of the previously discussed measurements and to estimate the total annual amount (or load) discharged to the water bodies in the Northern Territory. Table 5.3 summarises these discharges. Tables A2.2 and A2.3 provide monthly details.
In addition, the National Pollution Inventory (NPI) requires service facilities to report on the emission of certain substances to the environment. For sewage, NPI-listed substances include ammonia, total nitrogen and total phosphorus.
13 Metcalf & Eddy (2003)
power and water corporation20
Table 5.3: Annual environmental mass loading as required by Waste Discharge Licences
discharge location
waste
discharge
licence
number
suspended
solids
(tonnes)
volatile
suspended
solids
(tonnes)
ammonia
(tonnes)
total
kjeldahl
nitrogen
(tonnes)
total
phosphorus
(tonnes)
bod5
(tonnes)
Berrimah WDL 69 24.9 23.1 0.69 3.78 1.37 6.63
Katherine WDL 73 30.6 30.1 1.08 4.94 1.42 28.3
Larrakeyah WDL 70 275 253 36.5 57.6 12.1 191
Leanyer Sanderson WDL 72 717 599 12.2 78.8 42.6 241
Ludmilla WDL 71 482 332 87.6 122 28.1 287
Palmerston WDL 68 181 170 40.1 69.1 17.8 62.3
Alice SpringsEP7 outlet
WDL 139 36.3 33.3 0.56 4.77 1.44 15.8
Alice SpringsEP10 Outlet
WDL 139 96.3 83.4 0.37 9.59 2.18 20.9
Alice SpringsPonds B/C outlet
WDL 139 0.28 0.22 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.16
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 21
Section 6: Incident reporting and response
BackgroundPower and Water recognises it should respond rapidly and appropriately to pollution incidents or emergencies that can threaten public health or cause environmental harm.
A pollution incident is any event that causes or threatens to cause harm, adverse effect, or nuisance on the environment.
Following a pollution incident, Power and Water immediately ensures the area is made safe by controlling and containing the overfl ow, where it is practicable and safe to do so. Once the overfl ow is controlled, staff report the incident to Power and Water’s Environmental Service personnel. The report includes:
• The date, time, duration and volume of the overfl ow• The location of the incident• Reasons for the incident (if known)• Controlling actions undertaken• Personnel involved• Any other information that may be relevant.
The Environmental Services staff may also seek further information from other personnel and inspect the site to ensure any corrective or preventative action is implemented in a timely manner. Information about the incident is recorded in Power and Water’s incident database and a report provided to senior management.
Recorded incidents – sewerage systemsIn 2005-2006 only one environmental incident involving wastewater was referred to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) program.
Recorded incidents – treatment system (facility)The infl ow to sewage treatment plants can vary considerably from the average dry weather infl ow to the peak wet weather infl ow. Typical infl ow during wet weather may be three to fi ve times the average fl ow. In Darwin the high intensity rainfall associated with the Wet Season may increase the fl ow tenfold. The reasons for the high fl ow and our management strategy to reduce it are outlined in Section 3.
During 2005-2006 no environmental incidents involving treatment systems in the major urban centres were referred to the EPA program. Waste stabilisation ponds are ideally suited to highly variable infl ow. Their large volume and long detention time can resist the shock loading during wet weather.
incident number date location description cause
1 8 March 2006 Coconut Grove Unknown volume of raw sewage
Pump and alarm failure
Table 6.1: Recorded incidents of sewerage overfl ows reported to EPA14 program.
power and water corporation22
The Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant uses chemical assisted sedimentation (CAS) to treat the sewage. The effectiveness of this treatment process greatly depends on the concentration of the chemicals added to help settle out the solids in the sewage. If the fl ow increases greatly the concentration of the chemicals would be too low to be effective for settling the solids. Consequentially, the Ludmilla plant is less able to effectively treat the sewage when the infl ow varies greatly. Figure 6.1 shows the average daily fl ow pattern.
The capacity of the Ludmilla plant is about 10 000 kilolitres per day, however it can adequately treat infl ow up to about 30 000 kilolitres per day. During extreme rainfall, there are periods when the capacity is exceeded. During these times, it is necessary for fl ows to bypass the treatment process and discharge directly to Ludmilla Creek. When these events do occur, the untreated sewage is highly diluted by rainwater that has entered the sewage network. In 2005-2006 there were no recorded untreated discharges into Ludmilla Creek.
Apart from wet weather overfl ows, treated wastewater must sometimes be discharged into Ludmilla Creek rather than passing through the normal discharge at East Point. This occurs when infl ows are high, a pump breaks down or a pipe blocks. Figure 6.2 summarises these events.
f igure 6.1: daily inflow to ludmilla wastewater treatment plant
Daily
infl o
w vo
lum
e (kL
)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 23
figure 6.2: treated overflows to ludmilla creek
The quality of this discharge is reported in Appendix A1.4. The following table summarises all discharges to Ludmilla Creek during 2005-2006.
description of
overf low
untreated
plant by-pass
treated plant
overf lows
untreated
plant by-pass
treated plant
overf lows
untreated
plant by-pass
treated plant
overf lows
Overfl ow events (days)
0 167 0 153 12 142
Discharge volume (kL)
0 579 526 0 182 526 2162 484 719
Table 6.3: Untreated and treated overfl ows to Ludmilla Creek
Treated plant overfl ows to Ludmilla Creek represented about 12.2 per cent of the total discharge from Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treated overfl ows of less than 100 kL contributed about 36 per cent (or 60) of the total number of treated overfl ow discharges but only contributed 0.3 per cent of the total treated overfl ow volume discharged and 45 per cent of treated overfl ows with fl ows between 100 to 5000 kL discharged 101,910 kL or 17.7 per cent of the total treated overfl ow discharged. However, 19 per cent or 31 of the treated overfl ows discharged 82 per cent or 475 852kL of the total overfl ow volume discharged. The high overfl ow events occurred during late January 2006 (seven events) and March-April 2006 (24 events) during high rainfall.
Daily
infl o
w vo
lum
e (kL
)
power and water corporation24
f igure 6.3: sewage odour complaints
in the darwin area 2005-2006
Recorded incidents – odour complaintsPower and Water received 28 odour complaints in the Darwin region in 2005-2006. The number of complaints by suburb is shown in Figure 6.4. Table 6.4 compares the number of odour complaints with previous years. Complaints are registered in a database and investigated. Common causes of odour complaints are grease and fat build-up in the sewer and septic or stagnant sewage as a result of a sewer blockage. These are normally corrected by high pressure cleaning of the sewer lines.
year 2006 2005 2004
Number of complaints 28 43 34
Table 6.4: Number of sewage odour complaints in Darwin area 2006 - 2004
Recorded incidents – sewer overfl owsFigure 6.4 shows the location of 44 sewerage overfl ows from manhole covers that private landowners reported to Power and Water. These overfl ows usually occur on private property and were caused by either excessive stormwater ingress or the main pipe being blocked.
f igure 6.4: sewage overflows reported
to power & water 2005-2006
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 25
Section 7: Employee awareness and training
Power and Water is committed to ensuring that all employees are appropriately trained and are aware of their responsibilities. In working with wastewater where the employee’s and the community’s health is at risk, there is no room for compromise.
Awareness opportunities and strategiesWe use several strategies to ensure staff appreciate and develop awareness of the way their duties impact on wastewater and recycled water quality. These strategies, which are also used to develop skills and knowledge, include:• Monthly section meetings• Periodic “toolbox” meetings of work groups• Rotation of staff to other sections and centres• Management feedback sessions• Support for further education of employees• Employee training programs derived from individual
development plans• Development and implementation of job models for
service workers.
TrainingSeveral operational activities may adversely affect sewage collection, transfer, treatment and discharge if not performed correctly. We continually review and update our procedures as new equipment or techniques develop. Safety training is a high priority and includes training in:• Handling dangerous goods and chemicals such as chlorine
and lime• Operating self-contained breathing apparatus• Entering confi ned spaces• Performing rescues from pump wells and trenches• First aid• Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation• Fire and emergency evacuation• Managing unauthorised access situations• Operating dangerous equipment in public places• Electrical isolation, tagging and lock out procedures• Two-way radio procedures.
Our staff or agents who sample wastewater in centres across the Northern Territory also require training to ensure successful sampling and testing. We have developed a booklet for all wastewater samplers and provide initial training and refresher courses. In smaller centres, the agents are often employed by the Local Government Community Council and are referred to as Essential Service Offi cers or ESOs.
Other broader skills training, such as the Public Sector Management Program, frontline management initiatives and service worker job model related training, is also important because it develops skills for effective management and completion of job responsibilities.
power and water corporation26
Section 8: Community engagement and awareness
IntroductionWe see community engagement and awareness of wastewater issues as a high priority. We would like the community to:• Understand issues associated with wastewater and
recycled water• Help us minimise impacts of wastewater discharge by
adhering to regulations associated with trade waste and stormwater discharge
• Improve their confi dence in how we treat and discharge wastewater and how we use recycled water
• Participate in decision making to develop strategies for managing sewage discharges and using recycled water.
Darwin Sewerage StrategyThe community is kept well informed of the progress of the Darwin Sewerage Strategy and seems to welcome progress to close the Larrakeyah outfall. The community seems also supportive of any water recycling initiatives associated with the Strategy. Power and Water continues to modify its communication plan as the Darwin Sewerage Strategy continues to be revised.
Water recycling in the AliceThe Water Reuse in the Alice scheme has been developed to enhance sewage treatment, discharge and water recycling opportunities to the township of Alice Springs. This project was developed from the community’s expectation that the treated sewage be put to the highest value use possible and not lost to evaporation or discharged to the Ilparpa Swamp (Power and Water 2006d). Consequently we had numerous public presentations and open days at key sites. We have actively encouraged and welcomed community involvement in the environmental approval process associated with this project and will continue to do so.
Darwin Harbour Regional Plan of ManagementWe participated extensively in the preparation of the Darwin Harbour Regional Plan of Management including providing public presentations. Power and Water fully supports the plan, in particular the intent to improve the understanding to the region’s environment and the protection and enhancement of freshwater, estuarine and marine water quality.
Successful strategies to reduce the impacts of sewage and stormwater on Darwin Harbour should focus on key contaminants and on priorities for management, which should be based on the measurement of the major infl ows. At the same time a successful strategy would value the community’s vision of their local environment.
Power and Water is developing fact sheets and kits to inform the wider community of issues affecting Darwin Harbour region and management measures to address issues.
This report, and the information in it, is part of Power and Water’s contribution to meet the challenges associated with understanding and delivering sustainable waste management around Darwin Harbour.
Bird watchingWe are proud to support public bird watching activities at the Leanyer and Alice Springs waste stabilisation ponds (WSPs). Several ornithology books note both sites for their diversity of bird life. At the Alice Springs WSPs, bird hides; interpretive signs and a purpose-built bird-nesting island have been constructed.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 27
Section 9: Supporting research and development
We are involved in a number of research projects that aim to improve our management of wastewater and our recycled water quality. In some projects we carry out the research in-house; however, we mostly conduct the research in partnership with research organisations such as Charles Darwin University or Cooperative Research Centres such as the CRC for Water Quality and Treatment.
Chemical sedimentation trials at Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment PlantAs part of the Darwin Harbour Regional Plan of Management and the Darwin Sewerage Strategy, Power and Water has embarked on a plan to improve the quality of treated effl uent discharged by the Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant into Darwin Harbour. Laboratory jar test studies have shown that ferric sulfate with an appropriate polymer can improve the settling of sewage solids at Ludmilla. The jar tests also provide information about the optimum conditions for full-scale plant trials. The jar tests show about a 90 per cent improvement in water quality, whereas the full-scale plant trials achieved about 50 –per cent improvement. Further trials will attempt to identify technical aspects that limited the effectiveness of ferric sulfate during the plant trials.
Hydrodynamic and dispersion modelling of municipal effl uent discharged into Darwin HarbourPower and Water currently treats Darwin’s sewage at fi ve treatment facilities, ranging from physical maceration treatment to biological treatment with waste stabilisation ponds . Treated effl uent is discharged into Darwin Harbour at fi ve points, under Waste Discharge Licences issued by the EPA program under section 74 of the Water Act (2004), as listed in Table 9.1.
treatment facility discharge point easting* northing*
Palmerston Waste Stabilisation Ponds Darwin Harbour 711190E 8616180N
Berrimah Waste Stabilisation Ponds Darwin Harbour 707640E 8621960N
Larrakeyah Macerator Darwin Harbour 698720E 8620860N
Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant East Point 697998E 8628400N
Leanyer/Sanderson Waste Stabilisation Ponds Buffalo Creek 707475E 8632950N
Table 9.1: Summary of Waste Discharge Licences
Each licence requires monitoring of the water quality and volume discharged into Darwin Harbour. Furthermore, Power and Water is required to undertake a hydrodynamic and dispersion assessment of the effl uent in Darwin Harbour from each of the discharge points.
To address this need Power and Water engaged the Charles Darwin University to undertake hydrodynamic and dispersion modelling using the existing two-dimensional (depth average) RMA Darwin Harbour Hydrodynamic and Water Quality.
Using the water quality module associated with the hydrodynamic model, the model was used to investigate particulate dispersion, as well as changes in pollutant concentrations in Darwin Harbour. The study aimed to use the model to:1. Expand the current hydrodynamic model to include Buffalo
Creek and thus be able to assess the discharge from the Leanyer/Sanderson Waste Stabilisation Ponds
2. Establish the extent of dilution and dispersion of effl uent discharged from the fi ve discharge points under the full tidal range in the harbour during both Dry and Wet Season conditions and discharges
3. Predict pollutant concentrations in Darwin Harbour for current and future development scenarios from all discharge points
4. Assess the feasibility of timing the discharges to the tidal regime for Buffalo Creek and East Point to improve dispersion and dilution of the effl uent at the discharge point and beyond into the harbour.
The modelling showed that (Valentine et al 2006):
• The Ludmilla and Palmerston outfalls result in the greatest environmental concentration of pollutants with the largest area of impact. The areas of impact at both the Berrimah and Larrakeyah outfalls are very small.
• Environmental improvements in Buffalo Creek can only be achieved through either enhanced treatment or an alternative discharge location (for example, off Lee Point).
*AMG
power and water corporation28
Section 10: Documentation and reporting
Wastewater quality databaseRecording wastewater quality data and reporting treatment performance is an integral part of any wastewater quality management system.
Power and Water uses the Corporate Works Information Management System (WIMS) to enter, store, and retrieve wastewater quality data. WIMS automatically generates work orders so that all relevant sampling analyses are done through the year to comply with regulatory and operational requirements.
Work orders allow effi cient waste sampling scheduling by Power and Water employees, essential service operators and trained contractors, and tracking of sampling runs for audit purpose. Although the WIMS database is conforming to expectation, Power and Water is always looking for system improvements to help our data storage and analysis.
DocumentationAll our documents including this report and previous reports in this series, standard operating procedures, the Wastewater Monitoring Program (2005-2006), guideline documents and other reports commissioned by Power and Water are stored on an electronic database for easy retrieval. These documents are continually reviewed when new information becomes available.
ReportingThe WIMS database allows the reports required for regulatory compliance to be formulated effi ciently.
This document is a key component of our reporting obligation to the Department of Natural Resources, the Environment and the Arts (NRETA) and to the Department of Health and Community Services (DHCS) about sewage discharges and recycled water use. It also represents our commitment to public reporting and accountability.
Section 11: Evaluation and audit
Evaluating and auditing the sewage and recycled water quality management system is an important way to ensure the successful management and reuse of water. This report is an integral part of the review and evaluation process.
Audits assess if procedures and processes are in place to collect accurate water quality data and maintain appropriate management systems. As part of the audit process we have engaged independent external consultants to evaluate the Northlakes-Marrara water recycling scheme; the Alice Springs effl uent reuse and discharge scheme and the Yulara effl uent disposal scheme.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 29
Section 12: Review and continual improvement
Power and Water is committed to the ongoing development and improvement of the wastewater management system and the safety of the recycled water supplies.
ReviewThis report is an important way to identify wastewater management issues and facilitate recycled water quality improvements.
ImprovementVarious wastewater management and recycled water quality improvement works have been identifi ed as part of the capital works program for the coming year. Table 12.1 provides a summary of planned wastewater improvement works.
location planned works
Adelaide River No major works planned.
Alice Springs Water in the Alice project ($10.4m) is planned including the construction of an effl uent transfer pipeline, treated effl uent storage tanks, dissolved air fl otation (DAF) treatment plant and Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT). The DAF plant is due for completion in 2007.
Batchelor No major works planned.
Borroloola No major works planned.
Darwin Planned progressive upgrades to Ludmilla plant.Planned diversion of the Larrakeyah outfall.Undertake Stage 2 development of the East Arm wastewater treatment facility in response to current development and demand for treatment facilities in the Berrimah, Darwin Business Park and East Arm area ($1.6m)Upgrade of Humpty Doo ponds is planned for 2007.
Katherine Upgrade existing ponds to ensure compliance with existing Waste Discharge Licence ($0.2m).
Kings Canyon No major works planned.
Pine Creek No major works planned.
Tennant Creek No major works planned.
Yulara Implement SAT to further treat existing sewerage plant effl uent at Yulara ($0.5m).
Table 12.1: Planned wastewater improvement works
power and water corporation30
References
Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts. Water Act (As in for force at 14 January 2004).http://www.nt.gov.au/nreta/naturalresources/water/legislation/index.html
Metcalf and Eddy (2003) Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Reuse. 4th Edition revised by George Tchobanoglous, Franklin L. Burton and H. David Stensel, McGraw-Hill series in civil and environmental engineering.
National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000a) Guidelines for sewerage systems – Use of reclaimed water. Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ), Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000b). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Volume 1, The Guidelines (Chapters 1-7). Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ).
Power and Water (2003) Applying reclaimed water for irrigation schemes: Management and Safeguards Customer Information Handout.
Power and Water (2004a) Northern Territory communities and urban centres: Sewage pond data. Water Facilities.
Power and Water (2004b) Waste stabilisation ponds design manual. Water Facilities.
Power and Water (2005) Wastewater Treatment, Reuse and Discharge 2005.
Power and Water (2006a) Reclaimed water policy. Water Facilities.
Power and Water (2006b) Wastewater monitoring program 2005-2006. Water Facilities.
Power and Water (2006c) Guidelines for Buffer Zones – Sewage treatment, sludge management and effl uent reuse schemes. Water Facilities Draft.
Power and Water (2006d) Water Reuse in the Alice: Application for approval by the Department of Health and Community Services. Water Services.
Power and Water (2006e) Marrara Reuse Trial September to December 2005. Megan O’Mullane.
Power and Water (2006f) Future options for Northlakes Reuse Scheme Draft.
Valentine, Eric and Totterdale, Phil (2006) Darwin Harbour Effl uent Modelling: Report No.1. Charles Darwin University.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 31
Appendices
Appendix 1:Wastewater treatment performance (assessment)A1.1: Wastewater stabilisation pond (WSP) performance evaluation methodologyAll WSPs have a design capacity based on:• Organic content of sewage measured as BOD5 mg/L• Retention time of the water in the ponds to allow treatment to occur;• Temperature.
Overloading of a WSP could result in:• Excessive odours being generated, especially in the primary or facultative pond;• Poor water quality discharged from the plant, in particular unacceptable levels of ammonia and microorganisms.Because WSPs have long retention times they are able to absorb large hydraulic shocks. Consequently the performance of WSPs is assessed over a long-term basis rather than on daily fl ows. The true concentration of raw sewage is diffi cult to determine due to its heterogenous nature (that is, the sewage contains many different particles of various sizes and composition). To assess the performance of the WSPs the following values have been selected based on historical data and local and expert knowledge:• The organic content of the raw sewage is assumed as 120 mg/L BOD5.• Calculations for hydraulic load are based on the 90th percentile of the average monthly fl ow for the arid region and the 90th
percentile for the dry months for the Top End. For the reporting period 2005-2006 Dry months for this report are considered as June to December 2005 and May and June 200615.
• Ideal hydraulic retention time, assuming no short-circuiting occurs in the ponds.
Under ideal conditions the hydraulic retention time should not vary signifi cantly throughout the year. However, in the Top End, because of increase fl ows due to infi ltration, illegal connections and rainfall patterns the hydraulic retention time can be greatly reduced during the Wet Season. Treatment effi ciency will decrease with these shorter retention times. In particular ammonia is not oxidised as effi ciently.
Assessment of WSP performance in the Top End (from Katherine northwards) is based on the Dry months recorded during the reporting period. However, during a wet year increased rainfall can signifi cantly reduce the retention time for much of the Dry Season. For this reason, the current loading on WSPs for the Top End is based on the fl ows from the high rainfall year of 2003-2004 or, if greater, the fl ows measured during the year of assessment.
Further details on operation and design of WSPs can be found in our Waste Stabilisation Pond Design Manual (Power and Water 2004b).
15 See Appendix 4 Figure A4: Monthly rainfall for 2002-2003 to 2005-2006 at Darwin Airport.
power and water corporation32
mo
nth
ad
ela
ide
riv
er
ba
tc
he
lo
rb
er
rim
ah
16
bo
rr
olo
ola
hu
mp
ty
do
o
ka
th
er
ine
le
an
ye
r/
sa
nd
er
so
n
lu
dm
illa
la
rr
ak
ey
ah
pa
lm
er
sto
np
ine
cr
ee
k
Jul 0
5No
dat
aNo
dat
a16
.6No
dat
a3.1
67.3
337.6
219.
180
.317
8.7
1.4
Aug
05No
dat
aNo
dat
a19
.4No
dat
a3.2
66.3
393.3
230.
582
.018
1.51.9
Sep
05No
dat
aNo
dat
a14
.917
No d
ata
4.3
61.7
382.6
209.
194
.018
5.4
1.9
Oct 0
5No
dat
aNo
dat
a14
.8No
dat
a4.
465
.139
0.7
212.5
92.5
199.
61.9
Nov 0
5No
dat
aNo
dat
a14
.8No
dat
a3.8
68.6
251.9
251.9
94.9
198.
90.
9
Dec 0
5No
dat
aNo
dat
a15
.0No
dat
a3.3
73.9
261.6
261.6
93.6
198.
31.7
Jan
06No
dat
aNo
dat
a14
.9No
dat
a2.3
80.0
493.6
631.4
123.4
165.7
6.3
Feb
06No
dat
aNo
dat
a14
.5No
dat
a4.
458
.050
0.8
550.
889
.921
6.0
4.1
Mar
06
No d
ata
No d
ata
14.8
No d
ata
3.688
.4114
2.576
4.6
130.
229
3.05.
4
Apr 0
6No
dat
aNo
dat
a14
.4No
dat
a10
.615
0.1
972.8
797.5
121.6
316.
58.
8
May
06
No d
ata
No d
ata
14.2
No d
ata
6.1
97.1
550.
135
0.3
101.5
230.
54.
0
Jun
06No
dat
aNo
dat
a15
.4No
dat
a5.2
77.0
450.
427
3.297
.519
3.42.7
Tota
l ML/
annu
mNo
dat
aNo
dat
a18
3.8No
dat
a54
.195
3.561
27.8
4752
.412
01.4
2557
.640
.9
Mon
thly
90%
ile
all m
onth
s (M
L)No
dat
aNo
dat
a16
.5No
dat
a6.
096
.293
0.5
751.3
123.2
286.
76.
2
Mon
thly
90%
ile
Dry m
onth
s (M
L)18
No d
ata
No d
ata
15.9
No d
ata
5.583
.048
0.3
296.
498
.720
8.9
3.1
Daily
aver
age
Dry
mon
ths (
ML)
No d
ata
No d
ata
0.51
No d
ata
0.18
2.68
15.4
99.
563.1
86.
740.
10
16 N
o in
let fl
ow
dat
a w
ere a
vaila
ble f
or B
errim
ah fr
om Se
ptem
ber 2
005 u
ntil
June
2006
due
to fa
ulty
fl ow
inst
rum
ents
.17
For
Ber
rimah
aver
age i
nlet
fl ow
s wer
e est
imat
ed u
sing
the d
ata
from
the 3
pre
viou
s yea
rs.
18 D
ry m
onth
s for
the r
epor
ting
perio
d 20
05–2
006
are c
onsid
ered
as J
une
to D
ecem
ber 2
005 a
nd M
ay a
nd Ju
ne 20
06.
A1.2
: Mon
thly
sew
age
infl o
ws (
ML)
for N
orth
Reg
ion
(200
5-20
06)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 33
A1.3 Monthly sewage infl ows (ML) for South Region (2005-2006)
month alice springs kings canyon tennant creek yulara
Jul-05 205.6 10.4 14.4 21.6
Aug 05 212.5 8.2 10.3 21.8
Sep 05 233.9 6.4 13.8 21.8
Oct 05 243.3 7.0 12.7 21.8
Nov 05 225.2 7.6 15.8 20.7
Dec 05 253.6 5.6 19.5 21.2
Jan 06 236.6 6.4 37.2 22.0
Feb 06 235.2 5.5 28.6 20.0
Mar 06 251.1 6.0 27.2 21.8
Apr 06 219.5 2.3 28.3 21.3
May 06 226.4 2.2 28.1 19.7
Jun 06 217.9 2.4 26.7 20.9
Total ML/annum 2760.9 69.9 262.4 254.7
Monthly 90%ile (ML) 250.3 8.1 28.6 21.8
Daily average (ML) 7.56 0.19 0.72 0.70
power and water corporation34
lo
ca
tio
np
on
dtr
ea
tm
en
t
pr
oc
es
s
su
rfa
ce
ar
ea
(m2 )
vo
lu
me
(m3 )
de
sig
n
EPf
lo
ws
(kL)
(ADW
F)d
ete
ntio
n t
ime
(da
ys
)
BO
D l
oa
din
g
(kg/
D)Ad
elai
de R
iver
1 2 3
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
n
715
1560
6620
870
1530
6130
200
6433
20
Batc
helo
r1 2 3
Anae
robi
cM
atur
atio
nEv
apor
atio
n
1250
3520
23 55
0
2310
4750
23 55
0
550
176
7 2132 16
Berri
mah
1 2 3
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
n
14 25
014
0014
00
21 30
013
600
13 6
00
5000
1600
13 17 17
400
10 10Bo
rrolo
ola
1 2 3
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
n
1300
2640
2700
1950
1840
1830
Hum
pty D
oo1 2
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
n12
4112
4119
3018
7028
892
24 2018
Kath
erin
e1a 1b 2 3 4
Facu
ltativ
eFa
culta
tive
Mat
urat
ion
Mat
urat
ion
Mat
urat
ion
8900
8900
7 400
16 8
0016
800
19 0
0019
000
15 70
023
000
23 0
00
10 0
0028
0035
(T
otal
)60
0
Lean
yer/
Sand
erso
nLe
anye
r 1Le
anye
r 2Le
anye
r 3Le
anye
r 4Le
anye
r 5Sa
nder
son
1Sa
nder
son
2Sa
nder
son
3Sa
nder
son
4Sa
nder
son
5
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nFa
culta
tive
Mat
urat
ion
Mat
urat
ion
Mat
urat
ion
Mat
urat
ion
47 74
052
500
26 0
3026
030
26 0
3047
740
48 8
6026
030
26 0
3026
030
101 9
0063
100
31 20
031
200
59 6
0010
1 900
59 6
0031
200
31 20
059
600
20 0
00
20 0
00
21 20
0
21 20
0
10 5 5 5 10 5 5 5
1340
1340
A1.4
: Des
ign
deta
ils fo
r was
tew
ater
stab
ilisa
tion
pond
s in
Nort
h Re
gion
19
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 35
19 P
ower
and
Wat
er (2
004)
Nor
ther
n Te
rrito
ry co
mm
uniti
es a
nd u
rban
cent
res:
Sew
age p
ond
data
. Wat
er Fa
ciliti
es.
lo
ca
tio
np
on
dtr
ea
tm
en
t
pr
oc
es
s
su
rfa
ce
ar
ea
(m2 )
vo
lu
me
(m3 )
de
sig
n
EP
flo
ws
(kL
)(A
DWF)
de
te
ntio
n t
ime
(da
ys
)
BO
D l
oa
din
g
(kg/
D)Pa
lmer
ston
1 2 3 4 5
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
n
70 0
0070
000
60 0
0060
000
60 0
00
105 0
0084
000
72 0
0072
000
72 0
00
20 0
0014
00
Pine
Cre
ek1 2 3
Anae
robi
cM
atur
atio
nEv
apor
atio
n
1390 770
2940
1320 740
2630
560
160
5 5 5.5
27 11 7
A1.4
: Des
ign
deta
ils fo
r was
tew
ater
stab
ilisa
tion
pond
s in
Nort
h Re
gion
19
power and water corporation36
lo
ca
tio
np
on
dtr
ea
tm
en
t
pr
oc
es
s
su
rfa
ce
ar
ea
(m2 )
vo
lu
me
(m3 )
de
sig
n
EPf
lo
ws
(kL)
(ADW
F)d
ete
ntio
n t
ime
(da
ys
)
BO
D l
oa
din
g
(kg/
D)Al
ice Sp
rings
Set A
(Old
lago
ons)
AN1
AN2/
3AN
4AN
5A1 A2 A3 A4 EP
1EP
2EP
3EP
4EP
7EP
10
Prim
ary
Prim
ary
Prim
ary
Prim
ary
Seco
ndar
ySe
cond
ary
Seco
ndar
ySe
cond
ary
Seco
ndar
ySe
cond
ary
4500
4900
10,9
0019
700
9400
11 30
099
0044
0046
000
6750
7350
16,4
0029
600
5100
5750
4300
2600
28 10
015
0 00
0Se
t BB1 B2
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
n25
630
39 15
04
5300
47 50
080
0030
720
270
Set C
(199
0)C1 C2 C3
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
n
46 35
025
100
25 10
0
92 9
0031
200
31 20
0
17 50
045
5020
.4 7.2 7.4
1050
King
s Can
yon
1 2 3 4
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
n
2220
1670
1130
1130
4450
1670
1130
1130
Tenn
ant C
reek
1 2 3 4 5Ev
apor
atio
n po
nds
Facu
ltativ
eM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nM
atur
atio
nEv
apor
atio
n
9640
7510
7610
7650
7650
>240
000
18 70
097
1068
1074
1064
40
5800
3073
A1.5
: Des
ign
deta
ils fo
r was
tew
ater
stab
ilisa
tion
pond
s in
Sout
h Re
gion
20
20 Po
wer
and
Wat
er (2
004)
Nor
ther
n Te
rrito
ry co
mm
uniti
es a
nd u
rban
cent
res:
Sew
age p
ond
data
. Wat
er Fa
ciliti
es.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 37
A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North Region
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Adelaide River outlet from pond 3 (SAd035)
pH 1 8.7 8.7
Suspended solids (mg/L) 1 113 113
TDS (mg/L) 1 563 563
Ammonia (mg/L) 1 <1 0.5
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 1 15.5 15.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 1 7 7
BOD5 (mg/L) 1 36 36
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 1 <200 <200
Batchelor outlet from pond 3 (SBa025)
pH 1 7.7 7.7
Suspended solids (mg/L) 1 87 87
TDS (mg/L) 1 350 350
Ammonia (mg/L) 1 4.0 4.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 1 16.0 16.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 1 3 3
BOD5 (mg/L) 1 60 60
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 1 <2000 <2000
Berrimah outlet from pond 3 after weir (SBe100) Dry months
pH 8 9.4 9.2 9.5
Suspended solids (mg/L) 8 78 88 132
TDS (mg/L) 8 814 753 1081
Ammonia (mg/L) 8 1.5 3.6 7.2
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 8 13.5 16.3 24.9
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 8 6 7 8
BOD5 (mg/L) 8 16 22 41
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 8 301 624 1460
Berrimah outlet from pond 3 after weir (SBe100) Wet months
pH 6 9.3 9.2 10.0
Suspended solids (mg/L) 6 104 110 182
TDS (mg/L) 6 511 504 531
Ammonia (mg/L) 6 2.0 2.9 6.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 6 13.5 15.3 22.3
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 6 4 4 6
BOD5 (mg/L) 6 26 29 42
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 4 52 636 1717
power and water corporation38
A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North region (continued)
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Borroloola ponds outlet from pond 3 (SBo090)
pH 1 10.4 10.4
Suspended solids (mg/L) 1 314 314
TDS (mg/L) 1 281 281
Ammonia (mg/L) 1 <1 <1
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 1 30.5 30.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 1 7 7
BOD5 (mg/L) 1 40 40
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 1 <20 <20
Humpty Doo from irrigation wet well (SHD100)
pH 2 7.5 7.5
Suspended solids (mg/L) 1 21 21
TDS (mg/L) 2 478 478
Ammonia (mg/L) 1 37.0 37.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 1 44.0 44.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 1 13 13
BOD5 (mg/L) 1 14 14
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 4 37 055 39 778 56 533
Katherine pond E4 corner (SKa090)
pH 14 9.1 9.2 9.8
Suspended solids (mg/L) 14 78 100 168
TDS (mg/L) 14 260 280 397
Ammonia (mg/L) 14 <1 1.0 1.7
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 14 14.0 14.0 22.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 14 3 3 5
BOD5 (mg/L) 14 40 37 51
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 15 10 27 40
Larrakeyah after macerator (SLa010) Dry months
pH 7 7.6 7.6 7.9
Suspended solids (mg/L) 7 222 221 318
TDS (mg/L) 7 392 378 421
Ammonia (mg/L) 7 35.0 33.3 46.2
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 7 49.0 52.6 69.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 7 10 11 15
BOD5 (mg/L) 7 119 164 288
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 7 12 910 000 12 415 000 19 800 000
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 39
A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North region (continued)
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Larrakeyah after macerator (SLa010) Wet months
pH 3 7.2 7.3 7.8
Suspended solids (mg/L) 3 231 240 265
TDS (mg/L) 3 331 338 358
Ammonia (mg/L) 3 30.0 26.7 34.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 3 42.0 40.0 50.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 3 7 8 8
BOD5 (mg/L) 3 112 124 152
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 4 13 300 000 14 865 000 21 590 000
Leanyer outlet of pond over weir (SLe055) Dry months
pH 8 7.7 7.8 8.3
Suspended solids (mg/L) 8 106 107 148
TDS (mg/L) 8 332 342 391
Ammonia (mg/L) 8 1.5 1.8 3.3
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 8 14.3 12.6 17.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 8 10 12 22
BOD5 (mg/L) 8 48 44 58
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 7 300 3477 9580
Leanyer outlet of pond over weir (SLe055) Wet months
pH 3 8.4 8.4 9.0
Suspended solids (mg/L) 3 62 66 83
TDS (mg/L) 3 334 314 351
Ammonia (mg/L) 3 3.0 4.3 7.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 3 14.0 13.0 16.4
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 3 4 3 4
BOD5 (mg/L) 3 36 31 36
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 3 311 2067 4694
Leanyer/Sanderson discharge to Buffalo Creek (SLe100) Dry months
pH 8 7.8 7.9 8.3
Suspended solids (mg/L) 8 165 152 195
TDS (mg/L) 8 377 1926 5745
Ammonia (mg/L) 8 1.5 1.9 3.6
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 8 13.8 13.0 18.9
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 8 9 10 15
BOD5 (mg/L) 8 45 44 54
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 7 1300 1280 2200
power and water corporation40
A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North region (continued)
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Leanyer/Sanderson discharge to Buffalo Creek (SLe100) Wet months
pH 3 8.8 8.5 9.1
Suspended solids (mg/L) 3 79 76 94
TDS (mg/L) 3 333 321 357
Ammonia (mg/L) 3 3.0 2.5 3.8
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 3 15.0 13.5 15.4
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 3 4 4 4
BOD5 (mg/L) 3 35 35 37
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 4 963 1459 3175
Ludmilla Landside distribution manhole East Point (SLu100) Dry months
pH 6 7.8 7.9 8.3
Suspended solids (mg/L) 6 119 109 144
TDS (mg/L) 6 644 663 738
Ammonia (mg/L) 6 28.5 28.2 29.5
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 6 38.0 37.5 39.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 6 9 9 10
BOD5 (mg/L) 6 87 94 122
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 6 600 000 3 399 333 9 550 000
Ludmilla Landside distribution manhole East Point (SLu100) Wet months
pH 3 7.9 7.9 8.5
Suspended solids (mg/L) 3 50 82 128
TDS (mg/L) 3 360 360 395
Ammonia (mg/L) 3 5.0 6.3 9.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 3 11.0 11.0 14.2
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 3 3 2 3
BOD5 (mg/L) 3 23 20 34
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 3 <100 <100 <100
Northlakes/Marrara fi ltered effl uent from 1 ML clear tank (SNL020)
pH 10 6.4 6.3 7.6
Suspended solids (mg/L) 9 1 <1 1
TDS (mg/L) 10 381 373 448
Ammonia (mg/L) 10 1.0 1.6 3.1
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 10 2.8 2.8 4.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 10 0 1 1
BOD5 (mg/L) 10 <1 <1 1
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 12 <20 <20 <20
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 41
A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North region (continued)
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Palmerston fi nal effl uent from pond 5 (SPa100) Dry months
pH 6 7.6 8.0 9.0
Suspended solids (mg/L) 6 143 118 148
TDS (mg/L) 6 409 456 608
Ammonia (mg/L) 6 26.0 25.5 32.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 6 44.5 45.2 57.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 6 13 12 18
BOD5 (mg/L) 6 42 46 73
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 6 900 833 1050
Palmerston fi nal effl uent from pond 5 (SPa100) Wet months
pH 4 7.7 7.7 8.0
Suspended solids (mg/L) 4 62 61 80
TDS (mg/L) 4 250 249 275
Ammonia (mg/L) 4 15.5 14.8 17.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 4 23.0 23.3 26.1
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 4 6 6 8
BOD5 (mg/L) 4 19 19 22
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 4 168 367 738
Pine Creek wet well to reuse (SPC050)
pH 11 9.1 9.2 9.8
Suspended solids (mg/L) 11 77 90 155
TDS (mg/L) 11 282 278 396
Ammonia (mg/L) 11 1.0 1.3 2.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 11 9.0 10.5 16.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 11 3 3 4
BOD5 (mg/L) 11 28 33 56
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 12 122 200 458
Sanderson outlet of pond over weir (SSa055) Dry months
pH 8 8.4 8.4 9.2
Suspended solids (mg/L) 8 191 177 216
TDS (mg/L) 8 365 366 403
Ammonia (mg/L) 8 0.8 0.8 1.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 8 17.0 13.8 19.5
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 8 10 11 15
BOD5 (mg/L) 8 44 42 50
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 7 1,210 1,354 2,844
power and water corporation42
A1.6: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in North region (continued)
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Sanderson outlet of pond over weir (SSa055) Wet months
pH 4 8.9 8.6 9.3
Suspended solids (mg/L) 4 68 66 90
TDS (mg/L) 4 348 367 447
Ammonia (mg/L) 4 2.0 3.4 7.2
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 4 12.8 12.4 14.4
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 4 4 4 4
BOD5 (mg/L) 4 28 27 31
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 4 96 461 1181
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 43
A1.7: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in South Region
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Alice Springs ponds A Blatherskite Park outlet from EP1 (SAA040)
pH 14 9.2 9.1 9.6
Suspended solids (mg/L) 13 142 150 199
TDS (mg/L) 13 1040 1050 1236
Ammonia (mg/L) 13 <1 <1 1.8
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 13 20.3 20.4 27.4
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 14 4.6 5.0 6.5
BOD5 (mg/L) 14 55 56 76
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 48 125 1042 3050
Alice Springs ponds B Blatherskite Park outlet from EP2 (SAA045)
pH 14 8.7 8.5 9.0
Suspended solids (mg/L) 14 138 137 166
TDS (mg/L) 13 958 968 1,040
Ammonia (mg/L) 13 2.0 2.7 6.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 13 21.2 25.4 33.7
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 13 6.5 6.9 8.9
BOD5 (mg/L) 13 47 52 94
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 14 530 2124 7868
Alice Springs ponds A outlet EP7 to Ilparpa (SAA060)
pH 8 9.4 9.4 9.7
Suspended solids (mg/L) 8 124 156 274
TDS (mg/L) 8 1190 1184 1462
Ammonia (mg/L) 8 <1 2.5 6.1
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 8 20.5 18.3 24.2
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 8 4.4 4.9 6.6
BOD5 (mg/L) 8 40 43 61
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 33 500 4,095 10 120
Alice Springs ponds A outlet EP10 to Ilparpa (SAA080)
pH 9 9.4 9.3 9.5
Suspended solids (mg/L) 9 210 208 257
TDS (mg/L) 9 1520 1472 1556
Ammonia (mg/L) 9 <1 1.6 3.2
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 9 23.5 22.0 35.8
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 9 4.7 4.6 5.5
BOD5 (mg/L) 9 44 52 67
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 35 140 322 960
power and water corporation44
A1.7: Sewage outfl ow (discharge) quality in South Region (continued)
number of
samples
median average 90th percentile
Alice Springs ponds B/C combined outlet (SAB050)
pH 9 8.1 8.0 8.2
Suspended solids (mg/L) 9 105 100 109
TDS (mg/L) 9 953 958 1024
Ammonia (mg/L) 9 8.0 9.9 15.2
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 9 24.0 25.8 32.3
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 9 8.3 8.7 9.6
BOD5 (mg/L) 9 62 80 121
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 6 3,080 2209 3100
Kings Canyon outlet (SKK090)
pH No samples
Suspended solids (mg/L) No samples
TDS (mg/L) No samples
Ammonia (mg/L) No samples
Total nitrogen (mg/L) No samples
Total phosphorus (mg/L) No samples
BOD5 (mg/L) No samples
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 9 115 625 1620
Alice Springs ponds A outlet EP7 to Ilparpa (SAA060)
pH 1 9.0 9.0
Suspended solids (mg/L) No samples
TDS (mg/L) 1 1027 1027
Ammonia (mg/L) No samples
Total nitrogen (mg/L) No samples
Total phosphorus (mg/L) No samples
BOD5 (mg/L) No samples
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) No samples
Yulara outlet (SAA040)
pH 3 7.6 7.6 7.7
Suspended solids (mg/L) 3 7 20 41
TDS (mg/L) 3 981 981 1012
Ammonia (mg/L) 3 3.0 5.7 10.2
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 3 5.0 8.7 15.4
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 3 8 7 8
BOD5 (mg/L) 3 4 22 48
E.coli (cfu/100 mL) 2 800 800 1440
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 45
Or
ga
nic
lo
ad
ca
pa
cit
yS
ec
on
da
ry
po
nd
hy
dr
au
lic
ca
pa
cit
y
WS
P c
ur
re
nt
pe
rf
or
ma
nc
e
Ac
tu
al v
s d
es
ign
Hy
dr
au
lic
lo
ad
fa
cto
r
Or
ga
nic
lo
ad
fa
cto
r
Hy
dr
au
lic
lo
ad
- D
ail
y
av
er
ag
e
flo
w
90
%il
e2
1
Pr
ima
ry
po
nd
ar
ea
To
ta
l
se
co
nd
ar
y
po
nd
vo
lu
me
De
sig
n
or
ga
nic
lo
ad
Ca
lc
ula
te
d
or
ga
nic
lo
ad
Or
ga
nic
lo
ad
ing
of
de
sig
n
ca
pa
cit
y
Sp
ar
e
or
ga
nic
ca
pa
cit
y
Sp
ar
e
or
ga
nic
ca
pa
cit
y
Min
imu
m
de
te
ntio
n
se
co
nd
ar
y
po
nd
Ca
lc
ula
te
d
de
te
ntio
n
fo
r 9
0%
-il
e
flo
w
Th
eo
re
tic
al
hy
dr
au
lic
ca
pa
cit
y
De
te
ntio
n
lo
ad
ing
of
de
sig
n
ca
pa
cit
y
Sp
ar
e
hy
dr
au
lic
ca
pa
cit
y
Sp
ar
e
hy
dr
au
lic
ca
pa
cit
y
WSP
Loca
tion
L/EP
/day
mg/
L BO
Dm
3 /DAY
m2
m3
kg/H
a/da
y BOD
kg/H
a/da
y BO
D%
m3 /d
ay
EPd
ay
sd
ay
sm
3 /da
y%
m3 /d
ay
EP
Nort
h Re
gion
Adel
aide
Riv
er30
012
0-
715
7660
300
-N
D-
-20
-38
3N
D-
-
Batc
helo
r30
012
0-
1250
4750
300
-N
D-
-20
-23
8N
D-
-
Berri
mah
300
120
513
14 25
027
200
300
4314
3 050
10 16
720
5313
6038
847
2825
Borro
lool
a30
012
0-
1300
3670
300
-N
D-
-20
-18
4N
D-
-
Hum
pty D
oo30
012
017
712
4118
7030
017
157
134
445
2011
9418
9Ov
er-
load
edOv
er-
load
ed
Kath
erin
e30
012
026
7817
800
61 70
030
018
160
1772
5908
2023
3085
8740
713
58
Lean
yer
300
120
7747
47 74
018
5 100
300
195
6541
8813
960
2024
9255
8415
0850
27
Palm
erst
on30
012
067
3870
000
300
000
300
11639
10 76
235
874
2045
15 0
0045
8262
27 54
0
Pine
Cre
ek30
012
010
113
9033
7030
087
2924
782
320
3416
960
6822
6
Sand
erso
n30
012
077
4747
740
181 6
0030
019
565
4188
13 9
6020
2390
8085
1333
4443
Sout
h Re
gion
Alice
Sprin
gs30
012
075
64111
980
305 7
5015
081
5464
3321
445
2040
15 28
849
7723
25 74
5
King
s Can
yon
300
120
192
2220
3930
150
104
6986
286
2021
197
985
16
Tenn
ant C
reek
300
120
719
9640
30 37
020
089
4588
829
5920
4215
1947
800
2665
A1.8
: Per
form
ance
ass
essm
ent o
f was
tew
ater
stab
ilisa
tion
pond
s aga
inst
des
ign
crite
ria.
21 C
alcu
latio
ns fo
r hyd
raul
ic lo
ad a
re b
ased
on
the 9
0th
perc
entil
e of t
he av
erag
e mon
thly
fl ow
for t
he a
rid re
gion
and
the 9
0th
perc
entil
e for
the d
ry m
onth
s for
the T
op En
d. Fo
r the
repo
rtin
g pe
riod
2005
-200
6 Dr
y m
onth
s for
this
repo
rt a
re co
nsid
ered
as J
une
to D
ecem
ber 2
005 a
nd M
ay a
nd Ju
ne.
power and water corporation46
Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant treats sewage coming from Nightcliff, Winnellie and most of the inner city. The treatment process includes grit removal and solids screening, chlorination, and chemical assisted sedimentation. The treated water is discharged to Darwin Harbour via a pipeline at East Point.
Table A1.9.1 outlines the treatment performance of Ludmilla plant during both dry and wet months using measurements that best assess the environmental impact of the discharge. pH, suspended solids and total suspended solids (TDS) measure the physical characteristics of the water. Ammonia, total nitrogen and total phosphorus measure the amount of nutrients in the water that may promote the growth of nuisance algae. Ammonia is also a toxicant. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) is a measure of how much oxygen the organic content of the water will consume. Escherichia coli (E.coli) indicate if harmful pathogens (disease-causing microorganisms) are possibly present.
Generally the sewage during the wet months is weaker than the sewage during the dry months. Consequently the
discharge is of a higher quality during wet months. However the performance of the treatment process is best assessed against the water treatment objectives and water quality targets proposed in Table A1.9.2. The proposed objectives and targets were developed from:
• A comparison of the technical details with a similar plant at Lower Molonglo Water Quality Control Centre in the ACT
• A review of other literature sources• Laboratory jar tests carried out to assess theoretical
treatment effi ciency.Generally the Ludmilla plant is operating at or above its designed capacity. During dry weather the plant operates at an average fl ow of 9.5 ML per day which is the designed dry weather capacity. Over the whole year the average fl ow is about 25 ML per day which includes wet weather fl ows. The treatment plant performance is diffi cult to optimise during wet weather because of highly variable infl ows.
Measurement
(Median values)
Inflow
dry
months
Inflow
wet
months
Outflow
dry
months
Outflow
wet
months
% removal
dry months
(Worse case
– best case)
% removal
wet months
(Worse case
– best case)
pH 7.0 6.9 7.8 7.9 - -
Suspended solids (mg/L) 202 107 119 50 69 (27 – 91) 13 (0 – 55)
Total dissolved solids (mg/L TDS) 530 375 644 360 - -
Ammonia nitrogen (mg/L) 33.0 20.0 28.5 5.0 16 (0 –35) 63 (61 – 73)
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 44.5 28.0 38.0 11.0 20 (0 –40) 61 (55 – 61)
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 9.5 3.6 9.1 2.8 0 (0 – 36) 43 (26 – 50)
BOD5 (mg/L) 167 35 87 23 26 (0 –72) 34 (31 – 86)
E.coli (cfu/100mL) - - 600 000 <100 - -
Table A1.9.1 Treatment performance of Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant for major pollution measures.
It is interesting to note that the plant achieves high removal of ammonia and total nitrogen during wet months. The chemically assisted sedimentation process is not expected to remove nitrogen compounds. High fl ows during the wet months mean that the fl ow through the plant is very turbulent. Possibly the ammonia is lost to the atmosphere as the sewage becomes aerated during the turbulent fl ow through the plant.
On the other hand, chemically assisted sedimentation is expected to remove most of the phosphorus. It is disappointing to note that very little phosphorus is removed.
To improve treatment performance at the Ludmilla plant, Power and Water has commenced trials to test various combinations of chemicals that will assist in removing various water pollutants from the sewage. In addition other engineering practices and processes are under investigation to upgrade the treatment plant to subsequently improve the treatment processes.
Finally, it should be noted that this assessment is based on a limited number of monthly samples. Subsequently the statistical analysis may not refl ect the true performance of the plant during all conditions.
A1.9: Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant performance
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 47
A1.10: Yulara Wastewater Treatment Plant performance
Measurement % Removal objective22
Water quality target
pH - 6.5 – 8.0
Suspended solids 75 45
NH3 as N 30 23
Total Nitrogen (as N) 30 23
Total phosphorus as P 80 2
Organic carbon (as either BOD5 or COD) 60 65(COD target to be determined)
Turbidity 80 To be determined
Table A1.9.2: Proposed water treatment objectives and water quality targets for Ludmilla WWTP
22 Calculated as 90th percentiles of previous jar testing and other case studies (including Lower Molonglo) reported in the literature. The treatment objective was rounded to the nearest fi ve. The water quality target was rounded to the nearest digit.
23 National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000) Guidelines for sewerage systems – Use of reclaimed water. Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ), Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
The Yulara sewage treatment plant uses mechanical aeration (activated sludge process) to degrade organic matter and to purify the water. Effl uent from this plant discharges into a set of ponds and is then used to irrigate an adjacent tree lot. No effl uent is discharged off the site.
The chemical quality of the water (pH 7.6, suspended solids 7 mg/L, BOD5 4 mg/L and ammonia 3.0 mg/L) indicates that the activated sludge plant in combination with the ponds is operating adequately.
Appendix A3.2 explains how the quality of recycled water is assessed using the Guidelines for Sewerage Systems Use of Reclaimed Water (2000)23. The treated sewage (800 cfu/100 mL E.coli median value) from Yulara would be considered suitable for low uses such as irrigation of tree lots with controlled public access.
Based on the guidelines, the treated water at Yulara with a TDS of 980 mg/L (median value) would be classed as a high salinity water that cannot be used on soils with restricted drainage. Even with adequate drainage special management for salinity control may be required and the salt tolerance of the plants to be irrigated must be considered.
Appendix A3 provides more information about the recycled water quality.
power and water corporation48
Appendix 2: Wastewater Discharge Assessment
A2.1: Wastewater discharge licence evaluation and data presentationDischarging wastewater to waterways in the Northern Territory is prohibited unless it is done in accordance with a licence issued under the Water Act (2004). The Controller of Water Resources has granted the following licences to Power and Water Corporation:
This Appendix 2 provides an assessment of the sewage treatment in regards to its discharge to waterways. In particular it provides information about the quality of the discharge and the expected monthly and annual mass loadings for suspended solids (SS), volatile suspended solids (VSS), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) to the waterway. Data for pH and conductivity are also presented as requested. Because ammonia (NH3) is key environmental toxicant found in sewage discharges it has also been reported. This information is presented in spreadsheet and graphical formats.
All wastewater samples were collected as described by the Power and Water procedure for wastewater monitoring program 2005-2006. Microbiological and chemical analyses were carried out at the laboratories of the Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries and Mines (DPIFM).
Samples for determining metals in the discharge at Ludmilla and Larrakeyah were collected using an automatic sampler. Hourly samples were collected over 24 hours on 14 March 2006 from the Larrakeyah outfall and on the 13 December 2005 from the Ludmilla outlet. A proportion, based on the hourly fl ow rate over the daily fl ow, of each hourly sample was composited for analysis. Samples were analysed at the Northern Territory Environmental Laboratory (NTEL). The environmental loading for copper, zinc, cadmium, lead, nickel and iron were calculated from the measured concentration of each metal and the daily outfl ow and is reported in Table A2.5.1.
Because wet weather made accessing some sampling sites diffi cult and due to other operational diffi culties, some samples were not collected on all scheduled occasions. These are listed in Table A2.1.1
Where no chemical data was available, readings from previous and following months were averaged and used as an estimate for that month to calculate monthly loads.
Not all daily fl ow data is available for all sites and all months. Where daily fl ow data was not available, a median daily fl ow value was calculated for that month using available data and used to estimate a daily fl ow.
The waste discharge licence granted for the Alice Springs sewage treatment facility is a new format that differs from the previous licences granted to Power and Water. The management of the discharge is governed by:
• Discharge must not prejudice water quality objectives (WQO) outside of any agreed mixing zone when defi ned for the receiving waters
• Discharges must be reduced to the optimum extent by Best Practice Environmental Management (BPEM) in accordance with a hierarchy of waste management.
Location Licence number Expiry date
Berrimah WDL 69 31 July 2006
Katherine WDL 73 31 July 2006
Larrakeyah WDL 70 31 July 2006
Leanyer/Sanderson WDL 72 31 July 2006
Ludmilla WDL 71 31 July 2006
Palmerston WDL 68 31 July 2006
Alice Springs WDL 139 31 December 2007
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 49
The licence describes discharge limits based on up-to-date performance data and BPEM/SAT criteria. Previous licences did not prescribe discharge limits.
The licence also includes requirements to:
• Undertake adequate monitoring to ensure full compliance, to characterise the nature of contaminated discharge and ensure agreed WQOs are not prejudiced
• Manage off-site wastewater discharges and to assess aquatic ecological health in the receiving water body• Pro-actively implement BPEM with a focus on water recycling where possible• Carry out self auditing and reporting in line with industry best practice including incident reporting, event reporting as requested
by the controller, annual reporting and environmental management plan review.Alice Springs discharges have been assessed separately.
The waste discharge licence for the Katherine Waste Stabilisation Ponds specifi es that no discharge from the Katherine ponds shall occur while fl ow in the Katherine River is below a stage height of RL 3 m as measured at the hydrographic station GS 8140001. Then the discharge is only permitted if a minimum dilution rate of 1:2000 is maintained at the discharge point. Table A2.5.2 summarises this requirement for discharge and river fl ow.
Location Type of analysis Date
Berrimah ChemicalMicrobiological, chemical
January 2006May 2006
Katherine ChemicalMicrobiological, chemical
August 2005April 2006
Larrakeyah ChemicalMicrobiological, chemical
August 2005May 2006
Leanyer/Sanderson ChemicalMicrobiological, chemical
August 2005May 2006
Ludmilla ChemicalMicrobiological, chemical
August 2005May & June 2006
Palmerston Microbiological, chemical May 2006
Alice Springs
Blatherskite Park Pump Station wet well 1 from EP1. Chemical August 2005 - January 2006
Blatherskite Park Pump Station wet well 2 from EP2. Chemical, microbiological August 2005 - January 2006
Outlet EP7 to Ilparpa Chemical, microbiological August 2005 - January 2006
Outlet EP10 to Ilparpa MicrobiologicalChemical
January, March, April 2006August – December 2005
Outlet wet well ponds B/C MicrobiologicalChemical
March, April 2006August – December 2005
Table A2.1.1 Samples not collected
power and water corporation50
Lo
ca
tio
nF
lo
wp
HS
SV
SS
NH
3T
NT
PB
OD
5C
on
du
ctiv
ity
SS
VS
SN
H3
TN
TP
BO
D5
(kL)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(μS/
CM)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
Berri
mah Ju
l 05
16 6
499.
016
414
51.0
21.0
10.2
4618
142.7
32.
410.
020.
350.
170.
77Au
g 05
19 6
239.
4118
107
1.020
.06.
739
1671
2.32
2.10
0.02
0.39
0.13
0.77
Sep
0511
769
9.1
109
991.0
14.0
7.427
1583
1.28
1.17
0.01
0.16
0.09
0.32
Oct 0
511
457
9.4
5950
1.011.
05.9
1413
480.
680.
570.
010.
130.
070.
16No
v 05
16 8
129.
547
453.0
13.0
6.0
1679
60.
790.
760.
050.
220.
100.
27De
c 05
14 8
849.
564
583.0
13.0
5.515
649
0.95
0.86
0.04
0.19
0.08
0.22
Jan
0617
573
9.9
140
134
1.818
.36.
233
674
2.46
2.35
0.03
0.32
0.11
0.58
Feb
0618
056
10.2
216
210
0.5
23.5
6.9
5169
83.9
03.7
90.
010.
420.
120.
92M
ar 0
652
337
9.7
104
951.5
13.5
4.4
2781
05.
424.
950.
080.
710.
231.3
9Ap
r 06
48 70
98.
860
575.0
11.0
3.420
834
2.92
2.78
0.24
0.54
0.17
0.97
May
06
12 0
548.
865
627.3
15.0
4.4
1584
00.
780.
750.
090.
180.
050.
18Ju
n 06
8876
8.7
7067
9.5
19.0
5.4
1084
60.
620.
590.
080.
170.
050.
08To
tal a
nnua
l loa
d24
.923
.10.
693.7
81.3
76.
63Ka
ther
ine Ju
l 05
09.
116
716
01.0
20.0
4.6
4454
50
00
00
0Au
g 05
08.
918
918
11.0
25.0
3.949
594
00
00
00
Sep
050
9.0
168
163
0.5
19.5
3.239
644
00
00
00
Oct 0
50
9.1
121
1140.
515
.53.4
5267
40
00
00
0No
v 05
09.
5114
1111.0
12.0
2.942
514
00
00
00
Dec 0
520
296
10.0
166
165
0.5
23.5
6.8
4943
33.3
73.3
50.
010.
480.
140.
99Ja
n 06
95 8
049.
857
540.
810
.32.0
1833
35.
415.1
70.
070.
980.
191.7
2Fe
b 06
08.
965
630.
514
.52.
441
352
00
00
00
Mar
06
248
311
7.788
874.
014
.04.
410
339
121
.921
.60.
993.4
81.0
925
.6Ap
r 06
08.
073
712.3
10.8
2.762
331
00
00
00
May
06
08.
357
540.
57.5
1.021
271
00
00
00
Jun
060
8.9
3026
0.5
1.00.
714
461
00
00
00
Tota
l ann
ual l
oad
30.6
30.1
1.08
4.94
1.42
28.3
A2.2
: Mas
s loa
ding
disc
harg
e da
ta fo
r Ber
rimah
, Kat
herin
e, La
rrake
yah,
Lean
yer/
Sand
erso
n, Lu
dmill
a an
d Pa
lmer
ston
Was
tew
ater
Trea
tmen
t Pla
nts
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 51
Lo
ca
tio
nF
lo
wp
HS
SV
SS
NH
3T
NT
PB
OD
5C
on
du
ctiv
ity
SS
VS
SN
H3
TN
TP
BO
D5
(kL)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(μS/
Cm)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
Larra
keya
h Jul 0
580
285
7.614
112
954
.087
.016
.327
866
711.
310
.44.
346.
981.3
122
.3Au
g 05
82 0
267.6
162
150
44.5
67.0
13.0
199
639
13.3
12.3
3.65
5.50
1.07
16.3
Sep
0593
978
7.618
317
135
.047
.09.
7119
610
17.2
16.1
3.29
4.42
0.91
11.2
Oct 0
592
486
7.528
626
541
.057
.010
.510
962
826
.524
.53.7
95.2
70.
9710
.1No
v 05
94 9
128.
0110
105
35.0
49.0
9.0
150
532
10.4
10.0
3.32
4.65
0.85
14.2
Dec 0
593
622
7.023
622
426
.044
.07.7
9646
222
.121
.02.
434.
120.
728.
99Ja
n 06
123 4
287.9
222
196
17.0
34.0
10.3
9662
127
.424
.22.1
04.
201.2
711.
8Fe
b 06
89 8
537.2
273
258
30.0
42.0
8.0
11250
224
.523
.22.7
03.7
70.
7210
.1M
ar 0
613
0 21
86.
921
619
635
.052
.07.2
9957
928
.125
.54.
566.
770.
9412
.9Ap
r 06
121 5
927.9
231
211
15.0
26.0
7.316
252
528
.125
.71.8
23.1
60.
8919
.7M
ay 0
610
1 474
7.929
927
220
.038
.010
.723
359
730
.327
.62.0
33.8
61.0
823
.6Ju
n 06
97 4
837.9
366
333
25.0
50.0
14.0
303
668
35.7
32.5
2.44
4.87
1.36
29.5
Tota
l ann
ual l
oad
275
253
36.5
57.6
12.1
191
Lean
yer/
Sand
erso
n Jul 0
533
7 554
8.9
168
145
0.5
14.5
10.5
4555
456
.748
.90.
174.
893.5
415
.2Au
g 05
393 2
678.
220
515
30.
813
.810
.045
3772
80.6
60.2
0.29
5.41
3.91
17.70
Sep
0538
2 589
7.524
216
11.0
13.0
9.4
4569
9092
.661
.60.
384.
973.6
017.
2Oc
t 05
390
687
7.816
514
12.0
18.0
23.5
5163
664
.555
.10.
787.0
39.
1819
.9No
v 05
251 9
018.
015
514
05.0
21.0
11.0
5163
439
.035
.31.2
65.2
92.7
712
.8De
c 05
261 6
057.2
165
142
2.018
.08.
442
559
43.2
37.1
0.52
4.71
2.20
11.0
Jan
0649
3 551
7.817
513
71.0
13.0
6.8
1914
040
86.4
67.6
0.49
6.42
3.36
9.38
Feb
0650
0 84
28.
898
933.0
15.0
4.3
3557
649
.146
.61.5
07.5
12.1
517.
5M
ar 0
61 1
42 53
77.4
7970
0.5
15.5
4.1
3852
890
.380
.00.
5717.
74.
6843
.4Ap
r 06
972 7
519.
250
474.
010
.02.
432
424
48.6
45.7
3.89
9.73
2.33
31.1
May
06
550
063
8.5
6156
2.96.
64.
142
463
33.4
30.9
1.58
3.64
2.24
22.8
Jun
0645
0 42
07.8
7266
1.83.3
5.851
502
32.2
29.5
0.79
1.46
2.59
23.0
Tota
l ann
ual l
oad
717
599
12.2
78.8
42.6
241
A2.2
: Mas
s loa
ding
disc
harg
e da
ta fo
r Ber
rimah
, Kat
herin
e, La
rrake
yah,
Lean
yer/
Sand
erso
n, Lu
dmill
a an
d Pa
lmer
ston
Was
tew
ater
Trea
tmen
t Pla
nts
(cont
inue
d)
power and water corporation52
Lo
ca
tio
nF
lo
wp
HS
SV
SS
NH
3T
NT
PB
OD
5C
on
du
ctiv
ity
SS
VS
SN
H3
TN
TP
BO
D5
(kL)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(μS/
CM)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
Ludm
illa Ju
l 05
219
077
8.5
11687
30.0
39.0
9.1
126
965
25.4
19.1
6.57
8.54
1.99
27.6
Aug
0523
0 45
58.
313
310
229
.539
.59.
412
210
2530
.723
.56.
809.
102.1
728
.0Se
p 05
209
074
8.1
150
11729
.040
.09.
7117
1085
31.4
24.5
6.06
8.36
2.03
24.5
Oct 0
521
2 467
7.413
710
128
.038
.010
.986
1034
29.1
21.5
5.95
8.07
2.32
18.3
Nov 0
525
1 901
8.0
4741
26.0
34.0
7.087
1009
11.8
10.3
6.55
8.56
1.76
21.9
Dec 0
526
1 605
7.680
6727
.036
.06.
579
936
20.9
17.5
7.06
9.42
1.70
20.7
Jan
0663
1 384
7.512
294
29.0
38.0
9.0
7012
5477
.059
.418
.324
.05.6
844
.2Fe
b 06
550
840
7.150
4410
.015
.03.0
3757
027
.524
.25.5
18.
261.6
520
.4M
ar 0
676
4 57
77.9
148
735.0
11.0
2.823
641
113.2
55.8
3.82
8.41
2.14
17.6
Apr 0
679
7 487
8.6
4722
4.0
7.01.1
150
237
.517.
53.1
95.5
80.
880.
40M
ay 0
635
0 31
58.
112
594
28.5
38.5
9.3
102
1017
43.6
32.9
9.98
13.5
3.24
35.7
Jun
0627
3 249
8.1
125
9428
.538
.59.
310
210
1734
.025
.77.7
910
.52.5
327
.9To
tal a
nnua
l loa
d48
233
287
.612
228
.128
7No
te: C
once
ntra
tion
valu
es fo
r May
and
June
calcu
late
d us
ing
med
ian
valu
es fo
r all
dry m
onth
s.
Palm
erst
on Jul 0
510
4 56
07.3
6663
23.0
36.0
13.2
3958
86.
906.
592.
403.7
61.3
84.
08Au
g 05
116 0
367.5
148
139
30.0
47.0
12.9
100
669
17.2
16.1
3.48
5.45
1.50
11.6
Sep
0513
8 13
67.6
5955
28.0
42.0
12.1
2667
78.
157.6
03.8
75.8
01.6
73.5
9Oc
t 05
148
480
7.514
113
324
.047
.022
.345
628
20.9
19.7
3.56
6.98
3.31
6.68
Nov 0
518
7 879
8.1
148
140
14.0
31.0
9.7
4552
627
.826
.32.6
35.8
21.8
28.
45De
c 05
169
610
7.710
398
15.5
29.0
9.1
3348
717.
516
.62.6
34.
921.5
45.5
1Ja
n 06
140
1127.3
5856
17.0
27.0
8.5
2044
78.
137.8
52.3
83.7
81.1
92.8
0Fe
b 06
148
928
7.987
8011.
022
.07.0
2338
113
.011.
91.6
43.2
81.0
43.4
3M
ar 0
625
5 180
8.0
6562
17.0
24.0
5.818
411
16.6
15.8
4.34
6.12
1.48
4.59
Apr 0
631
2 466
7.533
3014
.020
.04.
516
337
10.3
9.37
4.37
6.25
1.41
5.00
May
06
172 7
508.
789
8224
.044
.04.
620
793
15.3
14.1
4.15
7.60
0.79
3.37
Jun
0613
6 53
19.
914
413
334
.068
.04.
723
1249
19.7
18.2
4.64
9.28
0.64
3.14
Tota
l ann
ual l
oad
181
170
40.1
69.1
17.8
62.3
A2.2
: Mas
s loa
ding
disc
harg
e da
ta fo
r Ber
rimah
, Kat
herin
e, La
rrake
yah,
Lean
yer/
Sand
erso
n, Lu
dmill
a an
d Pa
lmer
ston
Was
tew
ater
Trea
tmen
t Pla
nts
(cont
inue
d)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 53
Lo
ca
tio
nF
lo
wp
HS
SV
SS
NH
3T
NT
PB
OD
5C
on
du
ctiv
ity
SS
VS
SN
H3
TN
TP
BO
D5
(kL)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(μs
/c
m)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
Alice
Sprin
gs O
utle
t EP7
to Il
parp
aJu
l 05
23 32
18.
860
5911.
023
.07.3
271,3
591.4
01.3
80.
260.
540.
170.
63Au
g 05
18 30
09.
412
4114
0.5
20.5
4.4
401,8
802.2
72.0
80.
010.
380.
080.
73Se
p 05
62 6
229.
412
4114
0.5
20.5
4.4
401,8
807.7
77.1
10.
031.2
80.
282.5
0Oc
t 05
38 31
19.
412
4114
0.5
20.5
4.4
401,8
804.
754.
350.
020.
790.
171.5
3No
v 05
21 75
29.
412
4114
0.5
20.5
4.4
401,8
802.7
02.
470.
010.
450.
100.
87De
c 05
20 0
569.
412
4114
0.5
20.5
4.4
401,8
802.
492.2
80.
010.
410.
090.
80Ja
n 06
09.
412
4114
<120
.54.
440
1,880
00
00
00
Feb
060
9.1
126
1144.
024
.04.
927
1,856
00
00
00
Mar
06
09.
920
518
80.
524
.54.
337
2,47
90
00
00
0Ap
r 06
09.
628
326
30.
520
.55.3
532,0
700
00
00
0M
ay 0
627
248
9.3
8474
0.8
14.4
3.935
1,844
2.28
2.00
0.02
0.39
0.10
0.95
Jun
0610
3 421
9.4
122
1132.0
5.24.
475
1,479
12.6
11.7
0.21
0.54
0.46
7.76
Tota
l ann
ual l
oad
36.3
33.3
0.56
4.77
1.44
15.8
Alice
Sprin
gs O
utle
t EP1
0 to
Ilpa
rpa
Jul 0
50
8.6
120
103
1.017.
06.
349
2103
00
00
00
Aug
0542
600
9.4
210
181
0.5
23.5
4.7
4424
158.
957.7
10.
021.0
00.
201.8
7Se
p 05
103 4
379.
421
018
10.
523
.54.
744
2415
21.7
18.7
0.05
2.43
0.49
4.55
Oct 0
580
671
9.4
210
181
0.5
23.5
4.7
4424
1516
.914
.60.
041.9
00.
383.5
5No
v 05
46 9
089.
421
018
10.
523
.54.
744
2415
9.85
8.49
0.02
1.10
0.22
2.06
Dec 0
537
757
9.4
210
181
0.5
23.5
4.7
4424
157.9
36.
830.
020.
890.
181.6
6Ja
n 06
09.
022
120
48.
049
.05.3
130
2046
00
00
00
Feb
060
9.3
151
144
0.5
23.5
3.426
2420
00
00
00
Mar
06
29 0
309.
422
117
20.
532
.54.
742
2415
6.42
4.99
0.01
0.94
0.14
1.22
Apr 0
60
9.6
284
262
0.5
21.0
3.845
2506
00
00
00
May
06
30 4
429.
525
221
70.
526
.84.
244
2460
7.68
6.61
0.02
0.81
0.13
1.32
Jun
0691
129
9.5
185
169
2.05.6
4.9
5122
1116
.915
.40.
180.
510.
454.
65To
tal a
nnua
l loa
d96
.383
.40.
379.
592.1
820
.9
A2.3:
Disc
harg
e co
ncen
tratio
n an
d m
ass l
oadi
ng d
ata
for A
lice
Sprin
gs W
aste
wat
er Tr
eatm
ent P
lant
.
power and water corporation54
Lo
ca
tio
nF
lo
wp
HS
SV
SS
NH
3T
NT
PB
OD
5C
on
du
ctiv
ity
SS
VS
SN
H3
TN
TP
BO
D5
(kL)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(mg/
L)(m
g/L)
(μs/
cm)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
(To
nn
e)
Alice
Sprin
gs -
Outle
t wet
wel
l pon
ds B
/CJu
l 05
2450
7.810
581
24.0
37.0
10.1
6213
270.
260.
200.
060.
090.
020.
15Au
g 05
08.
110
586
8.0
24.0
8.3
6215
100
00
00
0Se
p 05
208.
110
586
8.0
24.0
8.3
6215
100.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
00Oc
t 05
175
8.1
105
868.
024
.08.
362
1510
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
Nov 0
514
8.1
105
868.
024
.08.
362
1510
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Dec 0
50
8.1
105
868.
024
.08.
362
1510
00
00
00
Jan
060
7.976
7113
.027
.09.
557
1636
00
00
00
Feb
060
8.1
11810
75.0
20.0
8.0
3816
080
00
00
0M
ar 0
60
8.2
107
874.
019
.07.5
5915
500
00
00
0Ap
r 06
08.
199
825.0
25.0
8.5
9415
420
00
00
0M
ay 0
60
8.0
104
8610
.023
.98.
998
1499
00
00
00
Jun
060
8.1
8772
13.0
31.1
8.2
120
1446
00
00
00
Tota
l ann
ual l
oad
0.28
0.22
0.06
0.10
0.03
0.16
A2.3:
Disc
harg
e co
ncen
tratio
n an
d m
ass l
oadi
ng d
ata
for A
lice
Sprin
gs W
aste
wat
er Tr
eatm
ent P
lant
. (co
ntin
ued)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 55
Qu
an
tit
ativ
e
dis
ch
ar
ge
lim
itO
utle
t E
P7
to
Ilp
ar
pa
Ou
tle
t E
P10
to
Ilp
ar
pa
Ou
tle
t w
et w
ell p
on
ds
B/C
Me
as
ur
em
en
tU
nit
sS
am
plin
g
Fr
eq
ue
nc
y
Me
dia
n9
0
%-il
e
Ma
x.
No
of
sa
mp
le
s2
4
Me
dia
n9
0
%-il
e
Ma
x.
No
of
sa
mp
le
s2
4
Me
dia
n9
0
%-il
e
Ma
x.
No
of
sa
mp
le
s2
4
Me
dia
n9
0
%-il
e
Ma
x.
pHpH
uni
tsM
onth
ly8
9.4
9.7
9.9
99.
49.
59.
79
8.1
8.2
8.4
Tem
pera
ture
Degr
ees C
Mon
thly
114
.014
.014
.01
14.0
14.0
14.0
113
.013
.013
.0Co
nduc
tivity
μs/c
mM
onth
ly8
1880
2308
2479
924
1524
7325
609
1510
1614
1636
TDS
mg/
L8
1190
1462
1560
915
2015
5616
209
953
1024
1040
E.col
icf
u/10
0mL
Mon
thly
1000
2000
7500
3251
010
36025
31 20
02635
140
960
1500
419
4025
3094
2531
00BO
D 5m
g/L
Mon
thly
5080
200
840
6175
944
6713
09
6225
12125
125
Tota
l Nm
g/L
Mon
thly
3040
508
20.5
24.2
24.5
923
.535
.849
.09
26.8
37.0
37.0
NH3
mg/
LM
onth
ly5
1030
80.
86.
111.
09
0.5
3.28.
09
8.0
15.325
24.0
Tota
l Pm
g/L
Mon
thly
710
158
4.4
6.6
7.39
4.7
5.56.
39
8.3
9.6
10.1
SSm
g/L
Mon
thly
200
300
500
812
427
430
499
21025
257
328
910
510
9118
VSS
mg/
LM
onth
ly8
11425
628
099
181
231
313
986
9110
7CO
3m
g/L
Mon
thly
01
391
33HC
O 3m
g/L
Mon
thly
140
31
576
150
3Ca
solu
ble
mg/
LM
onth
ly1
471
441
46Cl
mg/
LM
onth
ly1
175
132
01
145
Cl a
s NaC
lm
g/L
Mon
thly
144
51
813
136
9M
g so
lubl
em
g/L
Mon
thly
129
142
123
Km
g/L
Mon
thly
118
129
115
Nam
g/L
Mon
thly
119
01
327
116
8SO
4m
g/L
Mon
thly
189
114
21
78
A2.4
Sum
mar
y of t
he e
ffl ue
nt d
ischa
rge
perfo
rman
ce a
nd d
ischa
rge
com
plia
nce
for A
lice
Sprin
gs
24. S
ampl
es n
ot co
llect
ed in
suffi
cient
num
bers
bec
ause
(1) n
o fl o
ws
from
pon
ds d
urin
g so
me
mon
ths,
and
(2) l
icenc
e iss
ued
on 23
Dec
embe
r 200
5.25
. Val
ue ex
ceed
s qua
ntita
tive
disc
harg
e lim
it in
Was
te D
ischa
rge
Licen
ce 14
6.
power and water corporation56
A2.5: Comparative representation of discharge water quality. The following charts show the key water quality characteristics used to assess the wastewater discharge at the major wastewater treatment sites in the Northern Territory. These measurements include pH, BOD5 (biochemical oxygen demand), suspended solids (SS), total dissolved solids (TDS), ammonia (NH3), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and Escherichia coli (E.coli).
Comments are made about each site as follows:
• Berrimah: The conductivity was reduced by about 40 per cent in November 2005 following work to reline the sewer going to Berrimah to prevent seawater intrusion. It is diffi cult to assess if the treatment has improved the quality of the discharge until more data is collected.
• Katherine: Due to the long retention times in the evaporation ponds very little water is discharged from this site. Consequently the annual load discharged is small.
• Larrakeyah: The level of treatment at this site is minimal, which is refl ected in the quality of the discharge. Unlike the other discharges, the quality of the discharge during the Dry Season does not differ greatly from the quality discharged during the Wet. The fl ow during the Wet only increases by about 30 per cent whereas the fl ow of the other discharges may increase three to fi ve times, signifi cantly altering the quality of the discharge. It seems that little infi ltration occurs in the localised catchment to Larrakeyah.
• Leanyer and Sanderson: The combined treated fl ow is discharged to Buffalo Creek. Some water is used at the Marrara and Northlakes reclaimed water schemes. Signifi cantly higher fl ows were recorded during wet months.
• Ludmilla: The chemically assisted treatment system is intended to remove particles from the sewage. Removal is varied throughout the year. Signifi cantly higher fl ows were recorded during wet months.
• Palmerston: The volume of discharge increased by about two to three times during the Wet.
• Alice Springs: The water quality is present at four discharge points including: Outlet from EP7 to Ilparpa, Outlet from EP10 to Ilparpa, Outlet from B/C ponds and the take off point to Blatherskite Park for reclaimed water.
For completeness, Adelaide River, Batchelor, Borroloola, Humpty Doo, Northlakes/Marrara, Pine Creek and Yulara have also been included. These facilities do not usually discharge to a receiving waterbody. Tennant Creek has not been included as all the sewage evaporates in the ponds.
Where values for a characteristic are determined as less than the detection limit for the analytical method, the value is assumed to be equal to half the detection limit.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 57
figure a.2.5.1: median pH of treatment plant outflow or discharge
pH
figure a.2.5.2: median suspended solids for treatment plant outflow or discharge
Susp
ende
d so
lids (
mg/
L)
power and water corporation58
figure a.2.5.3: median total dissolved solids for treatment plant outflow or discharge
TDS (
mg/
L)
figure a.2.5.4: median ammonium (nh3) at treatment plant outflow or discharge
NH 3 (m
g/L)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 59
figure a.2.5.5: median total nitrogen for treatment plant outflow or discharge
TN (m
g/L)
figure a.2.5.6: median total phosphorus for treatment plant outflow or discharge
Tota
l P (m
g/L)
power and water corporation60
figure a.2.5.7: median bod5 for treatment plant outflow or discharge
BOD 5 (m
g/L)
figure a.2.5.8: median e.coli for treatment plant outflow or discharge
E.col
i (cf
u/10
0mL)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 61
Figure A.2.5.9: Berrimah discharge water quality results - physico-chemical
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
Figure A.2.5.10: Berrimah discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
(mg/
L)
power and water corporation62
figure a.2.5.11: berrimah discharge loading
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
figure a.2.5.12: katherine discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
(SS,
VSS,
BOD 5)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 63
figure a.2.5.13: katherine discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
figure a.2.5.14: katherine discharge loadings
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
power and water corporation64
figure a.2.5.15: larrakeyah discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
figure a.2.5.16: larrakeyah discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 65
figure a.2.5.17: larrakeyah discharge loadings
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
figure a.2.5.18: leanyer/sanderson discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
power and water corporation66
figure a.2.5.19: leanyer sanderson discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
figure a.2.5.20: leanyer/sanderson discharge loading
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 67
figure a.2.5.21: ludmilla discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
figure a.2.5.22: ludmilla discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
power and water corporation68
figure a.2.5.23: ludmilla discharge loading
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
figure a.2.5.24: palmerston discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 69
figure a.2.5.25: palmerston discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
figure a.2.5.26: palmerston discharge loading
Wat
er q
ualit
y mea
sure
power and water corporation70
figure a.2.5.27: alice springs ep7 discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
figure a.2.5.28: alice springs ep7 discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 71
figure a.2.5.29: alice springs ep7 discharge loading
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
figure a.2.5.30: alice springs ep10 discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
power and water corporation72
figure a.2.5.31: alice spring ep10 discharge water quality - nutrients
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
figure a.2.5.32: alice spring ep10 discharge loading
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 73
figure a.2.5.33: alice springs b/c ponds discharge water quality - physico-chemical
figure a.2.5.34: alice springs ep10 discharge water quality - physico-chemical
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- SS
, VSS
, BOD
5
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
- Co
nduc
tivity
power and water corporation74
figure a.2.5.35: alice springs b/c ponds discharge loadings
Wat
er Q
ualit
y Mea
sure
Metal Metal loading Larrakeyah outfall
(g/day)(14 March 2006)
Metal loading Ludmilla
outfall (g/day)(13 December 2005)
Copper (Cu) 1390 1060
Zinc (Zn) 385 735
Cadmium (Cd) 0.8 1.6
Lead (Pb) 11.6 24.5
Nickel (Ni) 15.4 294
Iron (Fe) 1890 7350
Table A2.5.1: Daily metal loadings of the discharge at Larrakeyah and Ludmilla outfalls
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 75
Date River Height (m) Allowable discharge
(L/s)Discharge flow at the
river (L/s)Calculated discharge
at the river (kL)
28 Dec 05 5.18 116 50 4320
29 Dec 05 6.15 147 150 12 960
30 Dec 05 3.55 75 59 5098
31 Dec 05 3.72 79 62 5357
01 Jan 06 8.10 228 99 8554
02 Jan 06 7.58 205 87 7517
03 Jan 06 4.26 91 82 7085
04 Jan 06 4.42 95 67 5789
20 Jan 06 4.39 95 77 6653
21 Jan 06 5.00 111 77 6653
22 Jan 06 7.37 195 77 6653
23 Jan 06 7.73 211 100 8640
24 Jan 06 7.60 205 92 7949
25 Jan 06 8.14 230 87 7517
26 Jan 06 7.46 199 82 7085
27 Jan 06 9.80 315 70 6048
28 Jan 06 7.75 212 60 5184
29 Jan 06 7.50 201 55 4752
14 Mar 06 7.48 200 180 15 552
15 Mar 06 8.35 240 175 15 120
16 Mar 06 8.72 259 170 14 688
17 Mar 06 9.18 282 170 14 688
18 Mar 06 10.85 373 170 14 688
19 Mar 06 11.12 389 180 15 552
20 Mar 06 10.50 353 180 15 552
21 Mar 06 14.82 718 65 5616
22 Mar 06 14.09 623 80 6912
28 Mar 06 5.46 124 75 6480
29 Mar 06 7.00 180 70 6048
Table A2.5.2: Katherine River discharge – Flow compliance with river height
power and water corporation76
Appendix 3: Recycled water
A3.1: Recycled water site description
Marrara Sports Complex and Northlakes Golf CourseThe Darwin Golf Club and the Marrara Sports complex both sourced treated effl uent from the golf course’s ornamental water feature (the pond at the centre of the course). Throughout 2005-2006 the pond stored treated effl uent from the Leanyer/Sanderson Waste Stabilisation Ponds. This water was supplied without further treatment to the following six customers at the Marrara Sports complex from July to October 2005:
• Australian Football League Northern Territory• Darwin Clay Shooters Club• Italian Club• Northern Territory Cricket Association• South Darwin Sporting League• Northern Territory Rugby Union
Customers can only use this recycled water supply from 11 pm to 5 am so that the watering does not occur during daylight when most people are about. In addition, prior to each irrigation cycle, the supply ring main is fl ushed to sewer with fresh recycled water to minimise the possible emission of odours.
The Northlakes Water Reclamation Plant (NWRP) at the Darwin Golf Course treats water from the golf course pond and provides high quality recycled water suitable for high contact uses such as urban residential garden watering and irrigation of open spaces and parks. The treatment processes include dissolved air fl otation (DAF), microfi ltration and disinfection with chlorine. The water is usually used to irrigate the Northlakes Golf Course. After October 2005, all customers at the Marrara Sports Complex use the highly treated water.
Yulara Wastewater Treatment PlantReclaimed water was once spray irrigated onto the tree lot adjacent to the plant. Due to fi re completely destroying the tree lot in early 2005 this recycled water use was discontinued. The previous practice of using reclaimed water for landscape irrigation at the Ayers Rock Resort has been replaced with non-potable ground water provided to the resort by Power and Water.
Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment PlantLudmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant uses reclaimed water for several plant processes including wash-down of sludge vacuum drying fi lters, spraying on reactors to control surface scum, furnace cooling and in grit classifi er to remove organics. Treated effl uent is fi ltered through a 400-micron fabric fi lter.
Humpty DooTreated water from the Humpty Doo wastewater stabilisation ponds is spray irrigated onto fenced bush land adjacent to the ponds. Power and Water is investigating ways to improve the water quality by upgrading the treatment. Aeration, recirculation and building additional secondary ponds are being considered.
Pine CreekReclaimed water from the wastewater stabilisation ponds is provided to the Pine Creek Council to irrigate the sports oval and rail corridor including the heritage area.
The rising main from the wastewater stabilisation ponds to the reclaimed water site is fi tted with a clean water fl ushing system, which effectively eliminates odours during irrigation. Backfl ow prevention devices and air gaps are used to protect the integrity of the drinking water supply.
The Pine Creek Recycled Water scheme has been discontinued due to diffi culties with maintenance.
KatherineThe Katherine wastewater stabilisation ponds provide reclaimed water for irrigation of cattle fodder. This reclaimed water is of a reasonable quality due to the extended retention time in the evaporation ponds. Power and Water is investigating alternative ways to use this water due to the uncertainty of this scheme continuing.
BorroloolaTreated water from Borroloola wastewater stabilisation ponds is spray irrigated onto adjacent bushland. The area is fully fenced to prevent any human contact.
Alice Springs Tree LotThe Alice Springs tree plantation of 25 ha of River Redgums was constructed in the mid-1970s by the then Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory to see if the treated water could be used to grow trees to be used as fi rewood. Because the plantation is on Power and Water land, public access is restricted. As alternative water recycling options come on line the use of the tree plantation will be phased out.
Alice Springs Blatherskite ParkThe effl uent irrigation system at Blatherskite Park commenced at about the same time as the tree plantation was established. Initially lucerne was grown but that was abandoned after a number of years. Today irrigation occurs on the sporting grounds, ovals and horse agistment areas in the park.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 77
Power and Water has negotiated with the Alice Springs Town Council and the Blatherskite Park trustees about the management of this system to limit public contact with the reclaimed water. The trustees have undertaken to:
• Limit daytime watering hours where possible• Provide a schedule of events when public access will occur to restrict irrigation during these times.• Restrict access to the park by locking the entry gates after certain hours.• Improve signage on and around the site.These controls will signifi cantly improve the safety of the reuse system.
Kings Canyon tree farmAll treated effl uent generated by the resort is disposed to a nearby tree farm. The tree farm is fully fenced to restrict publicaccess. Firewood is collected from the tree farm for use in bush camping areas of the resort. Investigations are under way to expand the plantation.
scheme name
(water source)
level of treatment application location public access
Northlakes(Leanyer/Sanderson WSPs) Tertiary Municipal
DarwinGolf Course
Controlled/unrestricted
Marrara(Leanyer/Sanderson WSPs) Secondary Municipal
Marrara Sport Complex – sports ovals Controlled
Humpty Doo(Humpty Doo WSPs) Secondary Municipal Tree lot Controlled
Ludmilla(Ludmilla WWTP) Secondary Municipal
In-plantprocesses Restricted
Pine Creek26
(Pine Creek WSPs) Secondary MunicipalSports oval
& rail corridor Controlled
Katherine(Katherine WSPs) Secondary Agriculture Cattle feedlot Controlled
Blatherskite Park(Alice Springs WSPs) Secondary Municipal Open spaces Controlled
Alice Springs Tree Lot(Alice Springs WSPs) Secondary Agriculture Tree lot Restricted
Kings Canyon(Kings Canyon WSPs) Secondary Agriculture Tree lot Restricted
Yulara Tree Lot27
(Yulara WWTP) Secondary Agriculture Tree lot Restricted
Table A3.1 Summary of recycled water schemes in the Northern Territory.
26 Pine Creek scheme discontinued due to diffi culties with maintenance.27 Yulara scheme discontinued after fi re destroyed the tree lot.
power and water corporation78
A3.2: Recycled water quality assessment methodology and criteriaGuidelines for Sewerage Systems Use of Reclaimed Water (2000)28 provide advice on reclaimed water quality, level of treatment, safeguards and controls and monitoring. It recognises that the major risk with wastewater is human contact with the wastewater causing infection from viruses, bacteria, protozoa and helminth. It specifi es water quality in terms of surrogates to provide an assessment of an acceptable level of risk. The guidelines recommend thermotolerant coliforms as a general indicator of reclaimed water quality. This group of microorganisms, when found in sewage, consists chiefl y of Escherichia coli (E.coli), which is found in the gut of humans and other warm-blooded mammals. The presence of E.coli in water indicates that the water is probably contaminated by human waste meaning that human pathogens (disease-causing microorganisms) are possibly present. The guideline values for thermotolerant coliforms fall into four main categories:
Compliance is determined by comparing the median values (the “middle” number) with the recommended guideline criteria for that use of water. In addition, if 20 per cent of the results are greater than four times the median guideline level, there is cause for further investigation for underlying reason.
It should be stressed that the determination of compliance is a statistical one and that an analysis result of greater magnitude than the median guideline value should not be an immediate cause of concern. The assessment should be undertaken on a continual basis.
Under the guidelines, another important issue associated with the use of recycled water is the potential impact of the chemical quality of the water on plants and on the characteristics of the soil. Increased salt loads may reduce the yield potential of salt sensitive plants and the infi ltration rate of the water through the soil. For example, high salinity waters may require restricted drainage so that the water can be used on soils. Even with adequate drainage special management for salinity control may be required and thesalt tolerance of the plants to be irrigated might need tobe considered.
In addition the guidelines stipulate that suspended solids be measured as a critical control to ensure effective treatment. Suspended particulate matter may shelter disease-causing organisms present in the recycled water from the effects of disinfection. The treated water from a wastewater stabilisation pond will contain high numbers of algal cells, which contribute signifi cantly to the suspended solids of the water. The mechanisms for disinfection in ponds include the effects of sunlight, predation by other microorganisms, sedimentation and die-off. Consequently the ability of a pond to remove pathogens depends on the time the water spends in the pond rather than the action of a chemical disinfectant. On this basis, suspended solids are not reported for pond systems supplying recycled water.
reclaimed water use applications thermotolerant coliforms per 100mL (median value)
Non-human food chain <10 000
Low contact, eg. irrigation of open spaces with controlled access <1000
Medium contact, eg, drinking water for stock (except pigs) <100
High contact, eg. urban residential garden watering <10
28 National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000a).
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 79
ty
pe
of
re
us
ele
ve
l o
f t
re
atm
en
tr
ec
la
ime
d w
ate
r q
ua
lit
yr
ec
la
ime
d w
ate
r
mo
nit
or
ing
co
ntr
ols
Urba
n no
n-po
tabl
eM
unici
pal w
ith u
ncon
trolle
d pu
blic
acce
ss(u
ses i
nclu
de ir
rigat
ion
of o
pen
spac
es, p
arks
, spo
rtsg
roun
ds,
dust
supp
ress
ion,
cons
truct
ion
sites
, orn
amen
tal p
onds
)
Tert
iary
And
path
ogen
redu
ctio
n30
pH 6
.5 – 8
.5(9
0% co
mpl
ianc
e of s
ampl
es)
<2 N
TUs31
1 mg/
L Cl 2 re
sidua
l32 o
r equ
ilave
nt le
vel o
f pa
thog
en re
duct
ion.
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms <
10 cf
u/10
0mL33
.
pH w
eekl
yBO
D w
eekl
yTu
rbid
ity co
ntin
uous
With
disi
nfec
tion
syst
em su
ch a
s ch
lorin
atio
n34.
Disin
fect
ion
syst
ems d
aily.
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms m
onth
ly.
Colo
ur re
duct
ion
may
be n
eces
sary
fo
r orn
amen
tal u
ses.
Appl
icatio
n ra
tes l
imite
d to
pro
tect
gr
ound
wat
er q
ualit
y. Sa
linity
sh
ould
be c
onsid
ered
for i
rriga
tion.
Urba
n no
n-po
tabl
eM
unici
pal w
ith co
ntro
lled
publ
ic ac
cess
(u
ses i
nclu
de ir
rigat
ion
open
sp
aces
, par
ks, s
port
sgro
unds
, du
st su
ppre
ssio
n, co
nstru
ctio
n sit
es, m
ines
)
Seco
ndar
y
Path
ogen
redu
ctio
n30Th
erm
otol
eran
t col
iform
s <1,0
00
cfu/
100m
L33.
pH m
onth
lySS
mon
thly
Disin
fect
ion
syst
ems d
aily.
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms m
onth
ly.
Appl
icatio
n ra
tes l
imite
d to
pro
tect
gr
ound
wat
er q
ualit
y. Sa
linity
sh
ould
be c
onsid
ered
for i
rriga
tion.
Irrig
atio
n ca
rried
out
onl
y whe
n no
pu
blic
acce
ss a
llow
ed.
With
hold
ing
times
nom
inal
ly 4
ho
urs o
r unt
il irr
igat
ed a
rea
is dr
y.Ag
ricul
tura
lFo
od p
rodu
ctio
nPa
stur
e an
d fo
dder
for c
attle
(fo
r gra
zing
anim
als e
xcep
t pi
gs a
nd d
iary
catt
le, s
heep
and
goat
s)
Seco
ndar
y
Path
ogen
redu
ctio
n30
pH 6
.5 – 8
.5(9
0% co
mpl
ianc
e of s
ampl
es)
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms
<100
0 cf
u/10
0mL33
.
pH w
eekl
ySS
wee
kly
Disin
fect
ion
syst
ems d
aily.
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms w
eekl
y.
Appl
icatio
n ra
tes l
imite
d to
pro
tect
gr
ound
wat
er q
ualit
y.
With
hold
ing
times
nom
inal
ly 4
ho
urs o
r unt
il irr
igat
ed a
rea
is dr
y.Dr
ying
or e
nsili
ng o
f fod
der.
Helm
inth
cont
rols35
.
A3.3:
Extra
ct fr
om G
uide
lines
for t
he u
se o
f rec
laim
ed w
ater
29 a
pplic
able
to u
ses p
ract
ised
in th
e No
rthe
rn Te
rrito
ry
29 Ex
tract
ed fr
om Ta
ble 3
Nat
iona
l Wat
er Q
ualit
y Man
agem
ent S
trate
gy (2
000a
).30
Pond
s onl
y do
not p
rovi
de su
ffi cie
nt p
atho
gen
redu
ctio
n. Sh
ould
inclu
de a
dditi
onal
disi
nfec
tion.
31
Lim
it m
et p
rior t
o di
sinfe
ctio
n. 24
hou
r mea
n va
lue.
5 NTU
max
imum
valu
e not
to b
e exc
eede
d.
32 To
tal c
hlor
ine r
esid
ual a
fter a
min
imum
cont
act t
ime o
f 30
min
utes
. 33
Med
ian
valu
e. 34
Disi
nfec
tion
syst
ems r
efer
to ch
lorin
atio
n, u
ltrav
iole
t irra
diat
ion
or o
ther
disi
nfec
tion
syst
ems.
Mon
itorin
g re
quire
men
ts in
clude
such
mea
sure
s as c
heck
ing
chlo
rine r
esid
ual o
r ope
ratio
nal c
heck
ing
of U
V eq
uipm
ent.
Mon
itorin
g fre
quen
cies d
o no
t app
ly to
pon
d or
lago
on sy
stem
s. 35
Hel
min
th co
ntro
l inc
lude
s mea
sure
s suc
h as
rem
oval
by t
reat
men
t, ve
terin
ary i
nspe
ctio
n, ca
ttle
hus
band
ry a
nd/o
r a w
ithho
ldin
g pe
riod
prio
r to
graz
ing.
power and water corporation80
ty
pe
of
re
us
ele
ve
l o
f t
re
atm
en
tr
ec
la
ime
d w
ate
r q
ua
lit
yr
ec
la
ime
d w
ate
r
mo
nit
or
ing
co
ntr
ols
Agric
ultu
ral
Non-
hum
an fo
od ch
ain
Seco
ndar
yan
d pa
thog
en re
duct
ion
via
mat
urat
ion
pond
s(5
day
s ret
entio
n tim
e)
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms
<10
000
cfu/
100m
L5
pH w
eekl
ySS
wee
kly.
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms w
eekl
y.
Disin
fect
ion
syst
ems d
aily.
Rest
rict p
ublic
acc
ess.
Salin
ity co
ntro
ls TD
S <10
00 m
g/L.
<10%
chan
ge in
turb
idity
(sea
sona
l m
ean
conc
entra
tion)
Diss
olve
d ox
ygen
cont
rols
may
be r
equi
red
for
fi sh
and
zoop
lank
ton.
Indu
stria
lOp
en sy
stem
with
hum
an
cont
act p
ossib
leSe
cond
ary
And
path
ogen
redu
ctio
n.Th
erm
otol
eran
t col
iform
s<1
0 00
0 cf
u/10
0mL5
pH w
eekl
y, BO
D w
eekl
y, SS
wee
kly.
Ther
mot
oler
ant c
olifo
rms w
eekl
y.Di
sinfe
ctio
n sy
stem
s dai
ly.
Addi
tiona
l tre
atm
ent b
y use
r to
prev
ent s
calin
g, co
rrosio
n, b
iolo
gica
l gr
owth
, foul
ing
and
foam
ing.
Win
dblo
wn
spra
y min
imise
d.
A3.3:
Extra
ct fr
om G
uide
lines
for t
he u
se o
f rec
laim
ed w
ater
29 a
pplic
able
to u
ses p
ract
ised
in th
e No
rthe
rn Te
rrito
ry. (c
ontin
ued)
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 81
class comment electrical conductivity (μs/cm)
total dissolved solids
(mg/l)
1. Low-salinity water can be used with most crops on most soils and with all methods of water application with little likelihood that a salinity problem will develop. Some leaching is required, but this occurs under normal irrigation practices except in soil of extremely low permeability.
0 - 280 0 - 175
2. Medium-salinity water can be used if moderate leaching occurs. Plants with medium salt tolerance can be grown, usually without special measures for salinity control. Sprinkler irrigation with the more-saline waters in this group may cause leaf scorch on salt-sensitive crops, especially at high temperatures in the daytime and with low application rates.
280 - 800 175 - 500
3. High-salinity water cannot be used on soils with restricted drainage. Even with adequate drainage, special management for salinity control may be required and the salt tolerance of the plants to be irrigated must be considered.
800 – 2300 500 – 1500
4. Very high-salinity water is not suitable for irrigation water under ordinary conditions. For use, soils must be permeable, drainage adequate, water must be applied in excess to provide considerable leaching and salt-tolerant crops should be selected.
2300 – 5500 1500 – 3500
5. Extremely high-salinity water may be used on permeable, well-drained soils under good management, especially in relation to leaching and for salt-tolerant crops, or occasional emergency use.
>5500 >3500
A3.4: General guidelines for salinity of irrigation water36
36 Table 4 National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000a) taken from National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000b) Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters.
power and water corporation82
mo
nth
(kl)
da
rw
in
go
lf
clu
b
ma
rr
ar
alu
dm
illa
37
hu
mp
ty
do
o
pin
e
cr
ee
k3
8
yu
la
ra
tr
ee
fa
rm
39
kin
gs
ca
ny
on
ka
th
er
ine
alic
e
sp
rin
gs
tr
ee
fa
rm
allic
e
sp
rin
gs
bla
th
er
sk
ite
pa
rk
Jul 0
528
359
9935
014
150
016
530
086
80
Aug
0526
211
10 12
00
1676
00
2653
14 36
80
43 8
48
Sep
0531
410
11 29
10
1709
00
1634
7251
23 0
1012
4 74
0
Oct 0
522
101
16 9
420
1487
00
467
8923
13 16
063
590
Nov 0
515
997
11 61
90
2566
00
248
664
11 73
480
710
Dec 0
528
251
6666
025
610
00
57 0
8435
50117
485
Jan
0666
6415
500
2207
00
017
0516
880
126
555
Feb
0657
8010
374
036
540
00
012
450
87 37
0
Mar
06
12 24
237
40
3332
00
481
2341
012
4 46
0
Apr 0
626
6325
90
9621
00
750
6385
21 9
5713
6 67
0
May
06
23 6
704
191
036
810
00
6172
23 52
110
4 00
0
Jun
0624
659
16 24
90
2739
00
00
23 4
9453
180
Tota
l wat
er re
cycle
d22
8 00
799
570
036
648
00
640
152 8
9314
9 75
61 0
71 28
8
Tota
l tre
ated
effl
uent
4013
397 1
9241
5338
221 3
3512
998
364
411
1 953
23542
% tr
eate
d ef
fl uen
t rec
ycle
d2.7
20
058
.7841
.96
62.5
A3.4
: Rec
ycle
d w
ater
usa
ge (k
L)
Sum
mar
y of w
ater
recy
cling
in th
e Nor
ther
n Te
rrito
ry fo
r 200
5-20
06:
Volu
me o
f tre
ated
effl u
ent:
15.9
GL43
Volu
me o
f wat
er re
cycle
d w
ater
: 1.7
5 GL
Perc
enta
ge o
f tre
ated
effl u
ent r
ecyc
led:
10
.9%
37 N
eglig
ible
wat
er re
cycle
d in
pro
cess
es at
Ludm
illa W
aste
wat
er Tr
eatm
ent P
lant
follo
win
g di
scon
tinue
d us
e of t
he fu
rnac
e to
bur
n slu
dge.
38 P
ine C
reek
sche
me d
iscon
tinue
d du
e to
diffi
cul
ties w
ith m
aint
enan
ce.
39 Yu
lara
sche
me d
iscon
tinue
d af
ter fi
re d
estro
yed
the
tree l
ot.
40 Th
ese fi
gur
es d
o no
t inc
lude
the r
emot
e com
mun
ities
or t
hose
facil
ities
such
as T
enna
nt C
reek
whe
re n
o di
scha
rge o
ccur
s bec
ause
all
wat
er is
lost
to ev
apor
atio
n.41
Inclu
des a
ll se
wag
e tre
atm
ent f
acili
ties i
n th
e Dar
win
urb
an re
gion
such
as L
arra
keya
h, Pa
lmer
ston
and
Ber
rimah
.42
Inclu
des a
ll tre
ated
effl u
ent f
rom
the A
lice S
prin
gs se
wag
e tre
atm
ent f
acili
ty.
43 G
L = g
igal
itres
= 1,
000
x 1,0
00 x
one
thou
sand
litre
s (kL
).
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 83
A3.5: Recycled water qualityTable A3.5 reports the median values for E.coli against the guideline criteria as discussed in Appendices A3.2 and A3.3. Table A3.6 defi nes the salinity class for the water comparing electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids (TDS) against guideline recommendations (Appendix A3.4) for the managing salinity impacts on soils and plants.
Except at Humpty Doo, the recycled water is of a bacteriological quality suitable for its intended use. The quality of the water in the golf course pond is marginal for its intended use; however, this water is now further treated using the dissolved air fl otation and microfi ltration treatment system. At Humpty Doo, Power and Water is planning to build additional ponds to increase retention time in the ponds so that pathogen levels are decreased.
The recycled waters used in the Darwin, Humpty Doo, Katherine and Pine Creek schemes are classifi ed as Class 2 for salinity of irrigation water. This medium-salinity water should only be used on soils in which moderate leaching occurs and irrigated on plants with medium salt tolerance. Application rates may need to be low.
The recycled waters used in the Yulara and Alice Springs schemes are classifi ed as Class 3 for salinity of irrigation water. This high-salinity water should be only used on soils with adequate drainage and the salinity tolerance of the plants to be irrigated must be considered.
location sampling frequency E.coli (cfu/100mL)
Median 80th Percentile
Actual Scheduled44 Guideline Measured value
Guideline value
Measured value
Guideline value45
Darwin (Marrara) 046 Not defi ned Monthly No value 10 No value 40
Darwin Northlakes (Golf course pond)47
12 Monthly Monthly 1040 1000 4600 4000
Darwin Northlakes (Filtered water)
12 Monthly Monthly <2048 10 <20 40
Humpty Doo 449 2-Monthly Monthly 37 000 10 000 52 000 40 000
Ludmilla 0 Not defi ned Weekly No data 1000 No data No data
Pine Creek 12 Monthly Monthly 120 1000 410 4000
Katherine 15 Monthly Monthly 10 1000 36 4000
Yulara Tree Farm 050 Monthly Monthly No results 10 000 No result 40 000
Kings Canyon 99 Monthly Monthly 140 10 000 860 40 000
Alice Springs (Blatherskite Park)
48 Weekly Monthly 130 1000 1800 4000
Alice Springs(Tree Farm)
4 Weekly Monthly 1900 10 000 3100 40 000
Table A3.5 Monitoring and microbiological quality for recycled water in Northern Territory
Water recycling was not undertaken at Pine Creek and Yulara in 2005-2006; however, the water quality results are reported here for reference purposes.
44 As scheduled in Power and Water (2006) Wastewater monitoring program 2005-2006. Water Facilities.45 If 20 per cent of the results are greater than four times the median guideline level, there is cause for further investigation for underlying reason (National
Water Quality Management Strategy 2000).46 No samples collected from the Marrara system because the water supplied during 2005-2006 was a blend of fi ltered water from Northlakes treatment plant
and Darwin tap water.47 Samples collected from pond at Darwin Golf Course.48 E.coli values reported by the laboratory as <20 cfu/100mL.49 No fl ow occurs for many months during the Dry.50 Water recycling onto Yulara Tree Farm discontinued after fi re had destroyed the trees in early 2005.
power and water corporation84
location scheme electrical
conductivity (μs/cm)total dissolved
solids (mg/L)
salinity class51
Darwin Marrara No data52 No data Not determined
Darwin Northlakes(Golf course pond)
540 380 2
Darwin Northlakes(Filtered water)
600 380 2
Humpty Doo Tree lot 760 480 2
Pine Creek 450 280 2
Katherine 420 260 2
Yulara Tree Farm54 1550 980 3
Kings Canyon No data No data Not determined
Alice Springs Blatherskite Park 1600 1040 3
Alice Springs Tree Farm 1510 950 3
A3.6: Salinity classes of recycled water.
51 Appendix A3.4 extract from Table 4 National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000a) taken from National Water Quality Management Strategy (2000b) Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters.
52 No samples collected from the Marrara system because the water supplied during 2005-2006 was a blend of fi ltered water from Northlakes treatment plant and Darwin tap water.
53 Samples collected from pond at Darwin Golf Course.54 Water recycling onto Yulara Tree Farm discontinued after fi re had destroyed the trees in early 2005.
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 85
Appendix 4: Rainfall
figure a.4: monthly rainfall for 2002-2003 to 2005-2006 at darwin airport
Rain
fall
(mm
)
Month
power and water corporation86
List of fi gures
figure description page
Figure 2.1: Hydraulic and organic loading of design capacity for WSPs. 10
Figure 5.1: Median E.coli values in recycled water used with controlled public access. 16
Figure 5.2: 80th percentile E.coli in recycled water with controlled public access. 16
Figure 5.3: Median E.coli values in recycled water used for non-human food crops. 17
Figure 5.4: 80th percentile E.coli in recycled water used for non-human food crops. 17
Figure 6.1: Daily infl ow to Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant 22
Figure 6.2: Treated overfl ows to Ludmilla Creek. 23
Figure 6.3: Sewage odour complaints in the Darwin area 2005-2006 24
Figure 6.4: Sewage overfl ows reported to Power and Water 2005-2006 24
Figure A.2.5.1 Median pH of treatment plant outfl ow or discharge. 57
Figure A.2.5.2 Median suspended solids for treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 57
Figure A.2.5.3 Median Total Dissolve Solids for treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 58
Figure A.2.5.4 Median ammonium (NH3) at treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 58
Figure A.2.5.5 Median total nitrogen for treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 59
Figure A.2.5.6 Median total phosphorus for treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 59
Figure A.2.5.7 Median BOD5 for treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 60
Figure A.2.5.8 Median E.coli for treatment plant outfl ow or discharge 60
Figure A.2.5.9 Berrimah discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 61
Figure A.2.5.10 Berrimah discharge water quality results – Nutrients 61
Figure A.2.5.11 Berrimah discharge loading 62
Figure A.2.5.12 Katherine discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 62
Figure A.2.5.13 Katherine discharge water quality results – Nutrients 63
Figure A.2.5.14 Katherine discharge loading 63
Figure A.2.5.15 Larrakeyah discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 64
Figure A.2.5.16 Larrakeyah discharge water quality results – Nutrients 64
Figure A.2.5.17 Larrakeyah discharge loading 65
Figure A.2.5.18 Leanyer/Sanderson discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 65
Figure A.2.5.19 Leanyer/Sanderson discharge water quality results – Nutrients 66
Figure A.2.5.20 Leanyer/Sanderson discharge loading 66
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 87
Figure A.2.5.21 Ludmilla discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 67
Figure A.2.5.22 Ludmilla discharge water quality results – Nutrients 67
Figure A.2.5.23 Ludmilla discharge loading 68
Figure A.2.5.24 Palmerston discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 68
Figure A.2.5.25 Palmerston discharge water quality results – Nutrients 69
Figure A.2.5.26 Palmerston discharge loading 69
Figure A.2.5.27 Alice Springs EP7 discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 70
Figure A.2.5.28 Alice Springs EP7 discharge water quality results – Nutrients 70
Figure A.2.5.29 Alice Springs EP7 discharge loading 71
Figure A.2.5.30 Alice Springs EP10 discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 71
Figure A.2.5.31 Alice Springs EP10 discharge water quality results – Nutrients 72
Figure A.2.5.32 Alice Springs EP10 discharge loading 72
Figure A.2.5.33 Alice Springs B/C ponds discharge water quality results – Physio-chemical 73
Figure A.2.5.34 Alice Springs B/C ponds discharge water quality results – Nutrients 73
Figure A.2.5.35 Alice Springs B/C ponds discharge loading 74
Figure A.4 Monthly rainfall for 2002-2003 to 2005-2006 at Darwin Airport 85
power and water corporation88
List of tables
table description page
Table 2.1 Types of treatment processes and discharge techniques used in the Northern Territory. 7
Table 5.1 Summary of recycled water schemes in the Northern Territory. 15
Table 5.2 Typical composition of domestic sewage in the Northern Territory compared to the literature. 19
Table 5.3 Annual environmental mass loadings as required by Waste Discharge Licences. 20
Table 6.1 Recorded incidents of sewage overfl ows reported to EPA program. 21
Table 6.3 Untreated and treated overfl ows to Ludmilla Creek. 23
Table 6.4 Number of sewage odour complaints in Darwin area 2006-2004. 24
Table 9.1 Summary of Waste Discharge Licences. 27
Table 12.1 Planned wastewater improvement works. 29
Table A1.9.1 Treatment performance of Ludmilla Wastewater Treatment Plant for major pollution measures. 46
Table A1.9.2 Proposed water treatment objectives and water quality targets for Ludmilla WWTP. 47
Table A2.1.1 Samples not collected 49
Table A2.5.1 Daily metal loadings of the discharge at Larrakeyah and Ludmilla outfalls. 74
Table A2.5.2 Katherine River discharge – Flow compliance with river height. 75
Table A3.1 Summary of recycled water schemes in the Northern Territory. 77
Table A3.5 Monitoring and microbiological quality for recycled water in the Northern Territory. 83
wastewater treatment, reuse and discharge report 2006 89
Abbreviation and defi nitions (glossary)
algae Simple aquatic plants that are often microscopic.
ADWF Average Dry Weather Flow
BOD5 Biochemical oxygen demand measured over 5 days at 20 ˚C. A measure of the organic strength of the sewage.
bulk waste Trade waste that is delivered by truck.
CAS Chemically assisted sedimentation – a water treatment process.
cfu Colony forming units – One bacterium will form one colony on agar growth media.
Conductivity A measure of the ability of water to carry an electric current.
DAF Dissolved air fl otation – a water treatment process.
Discharge loading The total mass of a suspended or dissolved constituent in a sewage discharge measure over one year, expressed in units of tonnes per year. It is calculated by multiplying the determine concentration value by the associated outfl ow volume.
E.coli Escherichia coli – a strain of bacterium commonly found in the gut of warm blooded animals and used to indicate the degree of faecal contamination.
EP Equivalent population.
EPA Environmental Protection Agency.
kL Kilolitres – one thousand litres.
m Cubic metre – one cubic metre contains one thousand litres of water.
mg/L Milligrams per litre – a measure of the concentration of a substance in water.
Median The middle value in a distribution, above and below which lie an equal number of values.
Microfi ltration An advanced water treatment process using special membranes.
ML Megalitres – one million litres.
ND No data.
NPI National Pollution Inventory
NTEL Northern Territory Environmental Laboratory.
Nutrients Nitrogen and phosphorus which promote the growth of plants.
NRETA Department of Natural Resources, Environment and Arts.
Organic nitrogen Organic bound nitrogen that includes such natural materials as proteins, and peptides, nucleic acids and urea, and numerous synthetic organic materials.
Percentile Order statistics providing a way of estimating proportions of the data that should fall below a given value or percentile.
Pathogens Disease causing organisms.
3
power and water corporation90
PDWF Peak dry weather fl ow.
pH A measure of the acidity of the water on a scale of 0 to 14 with 0 being very acidic, 7 being neutral and 14 being very alkaline.
PWWF Peak wet weather fl ow.
Recycled water Sewage that is treated and used for benefi cial purposes.
SAR Sodium adsorption ratio is used to predict the potential for sodium to accumulate in the soil
SAT Soil aquifer treatment.
SCADA System control and data acquisition.
Sewer Part of the sewerage system that carries the sewage, usually a system of pipes.
SS Suspended solids – a measure of the portion of particular matter in the water that does not pass through a fi lter.
TDS Total Dissolved Solids – a measure of the portion of dissolved substances in water that passes through a fi lter.
TKN Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen – Analytical technique for determining the total amount of ammonia and organic nitrogen in the water.
Trade waste Industrial or non-domestic wastewater generated by industry.
VSS Volatile suspended solids – a measure of the amount of suspended solids lost during ignition.
WDL Waste discharge licence
WIMS Works Information Management System.
WSP Waste stabilisation pond
WWTP Wastewater treatment plant.
Abbreviation and defi nitions (glossary) - continued.
PalmerstonPalm PlazaUniversity AvenueGPO Box 1921Darwin NT 0801
Telephone (08) 8999 3620Facsimilie (08) 8932 6592
Alice SpringsGreatorex BuildingCnr Bath and Parsons StreetsPO Box 1521Alice Springs NT 0871
Telephone (08) 8951 5408Facsimile (08) 8951 5418
KatherineNT Government CentreFirst StreetPO Box 1045Katherine NT 0851
Telephone (08) 8973 8550Facsimile (08) 8973 8982
Tennant CreekNT Government CentrePeko RoadPO Box 505Tennant Creek NT 0861
Telephone (08) 8962 4554Facsimile (08) 8962 4395
Head Offi ce2nd Level, Mitchell Centre55 Mitchell Street, Darwin NT 0800GPO Box 1921, Darwin NT 0801Customer Service Offi ceGround Floor, Mitchell Centre, DarwinMonday – Friday (except public holidays) 8.00am – 4.30pmSaturday 9.00am – 12.00pmCall 1800 245 092ABN 15 947 352 360www.powerwater.com.au
spro
ut c
reat
ive