Office National d’Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales www.onera.fr Wake vortex characterization by Lidar technics : catapult and field trials. Wake vortex characterization by Wake vortex characterization by Lidar Lidar technics technics : catapult and field trials. : catapult and field trials. J-P. J-P. Cariou Cariou , , A. A. Dolfi Dolfi , , D. D. Goular Goular , D. , D. Fleury Fleury , B , B Augere Augere , M. , M. Jallot Jallot , JP , JP Lafforgue Lafforgue ONERA, ONERA, Palaiseau Palaiseau , France , France . . 11/02/05
60
Embed
Wake vortex characterization by Lidar Lidar technics ...wakenet.eu/fileadmin/wakenet2-europe/Wakenet2/Past Events/WG7, … · -2003 : development of a new mini-lidar set-up with triangulation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Office National d’Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales
www.onera.fr
Wake vortex characterization byLidar technics : catapult and field trials.
Wake vortex characterization byWake vortex characterization byLidar Lidar technicstechnics : catapult and field trials. : catapult and field trials.
J-P. J-P. CariouCariou,, A. A. DolfiDolfi,,D. D. GoularGoular, D. , D. FleuryFleury, B , B AugereAugere, M. , M. JallotJallot, JP , JP LafforgueLafforgue
ONERA, ONERA, PalaiseauPalaiseau, France, France..11/02/05
Page 2
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Working plan during Joint ProjectWorking plan during Joint Project
MINI LIDARS for wake vortexmeasurements in catapultfacilities B10 and B20
LIDAR for full scale wake vortexmeasurement
SIMULATION software of lidarDoppler signature in a wind fieldrepresentative of a vortex pair
LIDABEMO
Page 3
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
DOTA DepartmentDOTA Department
DOTA : Applied and Theoretical Optics Department120 employees, 90 scientistslocated at Palaiseau, Châtillon, Toulouse and Salon
SLS : Laser Sources and Lidars Research Unit (15p)coherent lidars for remote sensingfibre sources for aerospace applications
Page 4
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Working plan during PRFWorking plan during PRF
CATAPULT MEASUREMENTS
-1997-98 : development and improvements of SYLVA CO2 cw miniLIDAR for vortex measurement in catapult facility B10
-1999 : new measurement campaign & comparison between lidar andPIV measurements at catapult facility
-2003 : development of a new mini-lidar set-up with triangulationconfiguration for autonomous measurements in the B20 catapultfacility.
- 2004 : test of a new mini lidar technology, with an all fibre lidararchitecture at 1.5 µm .
Page 5
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Working plan during PRFWorking plan during PRF
FIELD TEST MEASUREMENTS
- 2000 : development of DASH2 CO2 LIDAR for field test measurement.Measurement campaign in La Cépière TOULOUSE
- 2001 : improvement of DASH2 Lidar
SIMULATION SOFTWARE
- 2002 : development of the SLAVA software architecture
- 2003 : exploitation of the software
Page 6
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Principle of coherent lidar measurementPrinciple of coherent lidar measurement
Laser anemometer :
A cw single frequency laser source (ν) is focused in the wind fieldAerosols, present in the vortex flow, backscatter part of incidentradiation, with a frequency shift fD corresponding to Doppler effect(fD= 2 Vr /λ) (Vr line-of-sight velocity)this Doppler shift fD is measured with coherent detection
LASER
°
°
°
V
Vr
Localoscillator
Mixer
Detector
Signalprocessing
ν
ν
ν
ν+fd
fd
v
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-40 -20 0 20 40
r(m)v(
m/s
)
22max.2)(
c
c
rrrVrrV
+=
Page 7
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
OUTLINEOUTLINE
CATAPULT MEASUREMENTS
FIELD TEST MEASUREMENTS
SIMULATION SOFTWARE
Page 8
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
MINI LIDAR CATAPULT MEASUREMENTSMINI LIDAR CATAPULT MEASUREMENTS
Lidarsystem
A 300model
lidar beam scanningseeding with smokeor oil droplets
Page 9
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Lidar experimental set up at the B10
θ = 40°
Scanning mirror
2 m
3,7m
CO2 Lidar
mirrormirror
alignement laser
MCT detector
Page 10
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5Lidar characteristics for catapult
measurements
aircraft :• 1/20 th scale (span = 2 m)• speed 23 m/s• distance between model departure plan and laser plan (lidar+PIV) : 8 m• distance between model departure plan and arrival plan: 22 m
Repeatability : 4 successive flights, same model, same configuration
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 0.5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5
Page 20
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Comparison of TOMOSCOPY & LIDAR data Comparison of TOMOSCOPY & LIDAR data
Angle °
Wing spans0 10 20 30 40 50 60
10
15
20
25
30
35
40F 13
Tomoscopy cores angular positions
Lidar cores angular positions
Page 21
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Circulation calculation
• Circulation : good parameter to estimate thevortex strength and effects on potential wakeencounters
•Γ= 2.π.r.V(r) for 2.rc < r < rmaxr is the distance from the core centre2rc : core diameter
• Absolute core position given by Tomoscopy
Page 22
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Circulation calculationCirculation calculation
3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 70
wingspans
circ
ulat
ion
Wake vortex profile
right core position
left core position
scanning angle
vortex radius
circulation
Circulation 2rc:2
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
0,00 5,00 10,00 15,00 20,00 25,00 30,00 35,00
wing span
circ
ulat
ion
(m2/
s)
A300
Page 23
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Circulation calculation
In B10 , lidar is side viewingPart between the cores are
mixed.
For circulation, only outerparts of the vortex are used
circulation values arebiased by superposition ofthe two vortices
In B10, altitude of flight is too low to see vortex decay
in circulation values
Page 24
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
New B20 facility ( 90 m x 20 m x 20 m) is operational since 2002
The lidar is set under the model trajectory good separation
between vortices accurate circulation estimation.
Catapult measurements : New B20 facility
Lidar
Page 25
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
B20 and B10 lidar measurements comparisonB20 and B10 lidar measurements comparison
Wing spans
Spee
d m
/s
*10
*10
Page 26
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Lidar CO2Continuous Wave
Velocity resolution5cm/s
Cores localisation :10 cm
Measurements upto 100 spans
The CO2 mini-Lidar comprises two scanning mirrors for measuringvortex cores trajectories, velocity profiles and vortex circulation behinda catapulted model.
5Test of a new mini lidar technology, with an allfibre lidar architecture at 1.5 µmTest of a new mini lidar technology, with an allfibre lidar architecture at 1.5 µm
test of a new mini lidar technology, with an allfiber lidar architecture at 1.5 µmtest of a new mini lidar technology, with an allfiber lidar architecture at 1.5 µm
Page 34
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
OUTLINEOUTLINE
CATAPULT MEASUREMENTS
FIELD TEST MEASUREMENTS
SIMULATION SOFTWARE
Page 35
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5FIELD TEST MEASUREMENTSFIELD TEST MEASUREMENTS
Dash2 : CO2 CW coherent lidar
Bemol : truck platform
Topac : optronic pointing / scanning / tracking system
Mesurable speed > 25 m/s in the early (wrap-up) period ( scan speed = 20 °/s)
Page 40
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Temps en s
Vite
sse
en m
/s
Run0x05.vor
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Temps en s
Vite
sse
en m
/s
Run0x05.vor-ima5
12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15 Close-up of two pairs
Over 30 intersections of lidar beamwith vortex pair
(ONERA data from C-Wake trial)
Time0 60s
0
+15m/s
-15
Fast scan: multiple intersections with vortices
Page 41
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5TRIANGULATION CONFIGURATION with QinetiQ LIDAR
during WAKEOP campaign at Munich April 2001
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
120
TOPAC
LIDAR
BEMOL
Onera QinetiQ
LIDAR
wind
triangulation zone
Page 42
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5Vortex trajectory computation by
triangulationVortex trajectory computation by
triangulation
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 4095
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135triangulation Qinetiq-ONERA du : Vol 5 02/05/2001
X (m)
Z (m
)
Page 43
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Strategy of lidar measurements at Tarbes airfield
Onera lidar DLR lidar
Onera lidar DLR lidar
Page 44
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
B20B20
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
r/(s pan/2)
V/V
0
flight n°10. s peed evolution in le ft vortex
t/t0=0.32 s pan=013.5t/t0=0.53 s pan=022.2t/t0=0.74 s pan=031.0t/t0=0.95 s pan=039.7t/t0=1.16 s pan=048.5t/t0=1.37 s pan=057.2t/t0=1.58 s pan=065.9t/t0=1.79 s pan=074.7t/t0=2.00 s pan=083.4t/t0=2.21 s pan=092.2
TarbesTarbes
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
r/(s pan/2)
V/V
0 m
/s
flight n°:1-13. s peed evolution in le ft vortext/t0=0.47 s pan=017.8t/t0=0.61 s pan=023.4t/t0=0.76 s pan=029.0t/t0=0.91 s pan=034.7t/t0=0.91 s pan=034.7t/t0=1.06 s pan=040.3t/t0=1.21 s pan=045.9t/t0=1.35 s pan=051.5t/t0=1.50 s pan=057.1t/t0=1.65 s pan=062.7t/t0=1.80 s pan=068.3t/t0=1.94 s pan=074.0
Comparison betweeen B20 and fieldmeasurements
Comparison betweeen B20 and fieldmeasurements
Page 45
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
OUTLINEOUTLINE
CATAPULT MEASUREMENTS
FIELD TEST MEASUREMENTS
SIMULATION SOFTWARE
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Organisation chart of SLAVALidar inputs Atmospheric
inputsVortex inputs
Backscatteringcoefficient in the lidaranalysis plan
radial velocity alongthe line of sight
Wind field in the lidaranalysis plan
Theoreticalvelocity
profile V(r)
Velocity histogram
Temporal heterodynesignal
Spectral processing
Doppler image of thewind field function ofthe scanning angle.
Vmaxpoints
positionsTheoreticalcirculation
Lidar sensitivityalong the line ofsight
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Atmospheric inputs
Aerosol profile Wind profile
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Vortex inputs : theoretical model
Comparison of ideal modelswith experimentalmeasurements made in 2002on wakes of a A340 Airbus.
Hallock-Burnham : Γ0= 436 m/s², rc=3.3m
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Vortex inputs : vortex wind field
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Lidar inputs : heterodyne detection sensitivity
Measurement volume
Axial sensitivity
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Lidar inputs : scanning pattern
Page 52
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
x 10-4
-100
-50
0
50
100
signal temporel codé 8 bits
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6
x 106
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70spectres moyennés sur Ns - échelle en dB
Heterodyne signal time serie
Spectral processing
Doppler image ofthe wind field vsscanning angle.
Outputs
TF
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Intermediate outputs : theoretical circulation
Theoretical circulation(b/12-b/4) of an Hallock-Burnham ( Γ0= 436 m2/s,rc=3.3m ):0.93*Γ0.
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.30.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
%
circulation as a function of core position error vortex type : Hallock-Burman : Γ0=436 m2/s ; rcore=3.3 m
circulation / theoretical circulation circulation / circulation with no core position errorVortex profil (arbitrary unit )
core position error / span
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5 Intermediate outputs : Vmax points positions
function of angle of view
mean angle of view = 90°(lidar under the vortex)
mean angle ofview = 45°
mean angle ofview = 43°
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5 Intermediate outputs :circulation vs angle of view
example of velocity spectrafor vortices at 200 m, mean angle of view= 45 °, a focusing lidar to 282 m and a signal tonoise ratio on of -5 dB
circulation functionof angle of view
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Output : velocity profiles function of SNR
S/B=10 dB
Examples : vortex altitude= 200 m , Focus distance = 200 m , angle of view =90°Profile extraction level = 2 dB above the noise level.
S/B=0 dB
S/B= -10 dB S/B= -15 dB
Page 57
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
Measurement strategy for unseeded vortexMeasurement strategy for unseeded vortex
-Measurement of signal to noise ratio on wind on a spectrumanalyser ( narrow bandwidth)
- Extrapolation of signal to noise ratio to the vortex analyserbandwidth.
- -
circulation as a function of SNR and focalisation
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
focalisation distance
SNR
(dB
)
ninimum signal to noise ratio for a good circualtionevaluation (circulation value between 0.9 et 1)maximum signal to noise ratio for a good circualtionevaluation (circulation value between 0.9 et 1)
Summary of lidar modelingSummary of lidar modeling
≡ SLAVA : simulation software of lidar Doppler signaturein a wind field representative of a vortex pair
≡ Main Applications for cw heterodyne lidar :- error on measured parameters estimation (core diameter,
velocity profile, circulation)- lidar measurement domain for vortex detection
≡ signal interpretation help≡ signal processing optimisation
Page 60
PRF
DST
11/
02/0
5
ConclusionsConclusions
≡ Since 1997, DST Joint Program has been an efficientsupport to :
∨ to develop first lidars at Onera for vortex monitoring∨ to improve the tools for participating to international
campaigns (C-Wake, AWIATOR)∨ to test new generation lidars at the B20 facility∨ to develop modeling tools∨ To participate to a common effort at Onera in the field of
Wake Vortex understanding.Harris, M., Young, R. I., Köpp, F., Dolfi, A., and Cariou, J.-P.Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 6, 2002, pp. 325-331Wake Vortex Detection and MonitoringKöpp, F., Smalikho, I., Rahm, S., Dolfi, A., Cariou, J.-P., Harris, M., Young, R. I., Weekes, K., and Gordon, N.AIAA Journal, Vol. 41, 2003, pp. 1081-1088.Characterisation of Aircraft Wake Vortices by Multiple-Lidar TriangulationHolzäpfel, F., Gerz, T., Köpp, F., Stumpf, E., Harris, M., Young, R. I., and Dolfi, A.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 20, 2003, pp. 1183-1195.Strategies for Circulation Evaluation of Aircraft Wake Vortices Measured by Lidar