Top Banner
WEBFORUM 11 December 2002
45

W EB F ORUM

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

shea-rowland

W EB F ORUM. 11 December 2002. Revamping UCL’s Web Structure. Professor Roland Rosner Director of EISD. Information Strategy organisation. Information Strategy Committee. Steering Groups. Academic Systems. Administrative Systems. Infrastructure. Web & Intranet. Software & Standards. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002

Page 2: W EB F ORUM

Revamping UCL’s Web Structure

Professor Roland Rosner

Director of EISD

Page 3: W EB F ORUM

Infrastructure

Information Strategy organisation

Software &

Standards

Information Strategy Committee

Academic Systems

Administrative Systems

Web & Intranet

Working Group on Web Structure

Steering Groups

Page 4: W EB F ORUM

Working Party on Web Structure- terms of reference

• To further the Web and Intranet Steering Group's exploration of the structure of UCL domains and graphical mapping thereof

• To consider the revision of the structure of UCL domains

• To submit a final report and recommendations to the meeting of the Web and Intranet Steering Group in early Spring 2002

Page 5: W EB F ORUM

Membership

• Professor Roland Rosner (EISD)

• Jeremy Speller (Registry)

• Anthony Peacock (CHIME)

• Marco Federighi (Engineering Sciences)

• Professor Susan Hockey (SLAIS)

• Nicholas Tyndale (Development Office)

• Rachel Port (Secretary)

Page 6: W EB F ORUM

Mode of operation• Short monthly meetings - from Dec 2001

• Early decisions– restructuring of top levels

• target audiences• information about…

– content management– pilots

• Subgroups– design– content management

• Budgetary constraints

Page 7: W EB F ORUM

Conclusions• Design

– New look and structure

• Open source software for CMS– Zope

• Provision of CMS server– IS - Web Unit responsibilities

• Pilots– Registry, Bartlett, Engineering Sciences

• XML group– preparation for portals and MLE!

• Launch!

Page 8: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002

Page 9: W EB F ORUM

Introduction to the new look and the new structure

• Why now?• WPWS Report• What does it mean for Departments/Divisions?• Timetable• Examples

UCLONLINE

Page 10: W EB F ORUM

Introduction to the new look and the new structure

• Why now?– Ingram Initiative

– Legislation

• WPWS Report– Need to address target audiences

– Need for consistent style and menuing

– Visual & Production Design Project Group

• What does it mean for Departments/Divisions?– Central Divisions / Faculties will be strongly encouraged to work with us to

adopt the new framework

– Departments will be encouraged and helped if they wish to adopt the new framework

– Guidelines / templates / support will be provided AFTER the central site has settled down

UCLONLINE

Page 11: W EB F ORUM

Introduction to the new look and the new structure

• Timetable– Merger delay– Existing examples

• www.ucl.ac.uk/Registry• www.ucl.ac.uk/proposedmerger• www.chime.ucl.ac.uk• www.ucl.ac.uk/WebForum

– Development site - wu4.reg.ucl.ac.uk/build2– Launch

• Examples

UCLONLINE

Page 12: W EB F ORUM
Page 13: W EB F ORUM
Page 14: W EB F ORUM
Page 15: W EB F ORUM
Page 16: W EB F ORUM
Page 17: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002

Page 18: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Web Standards

Neil Martin

Web Support Officer (Production Design)

Page 19: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Summary

•Nature of web standards

•XHTML and CSS

•Web Accessibility

•Context of new design

Page 20: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

What are Web Standards?

• Web technologies developed by the W3C

• E.g. XHTML, CSS, XML, DOM

• Separation of Style and Content

Page 21: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Advantages of web standards?

• Inclusive design• Device independence & repurposing content • Better control over style - layout, colours • Reduction of costs/time consumption• Long-term viability of content• New versions of browsers are implementing

web standards • It’s the future - XML, etc

Page 22: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Standards Used In the New Design• XHTML

• Cascading Style Sheets (CSS1,CSS2)

• Web Accessibility Standard (WCAG)

Page 23: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

XHTML

•Latest version XHTML 1.1

•Highly structured - headers, paragraphs, lists, etc

•Ensure that all tags are closed (well formed) and properly nested

• HTML as an application of XML

Page 24: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

XHTML

•Latest version XHTML 1.1

•Highly structured - headers, paragraphs, lists, etc

•Ensure that all tags are closed and properly nested.

• HTML as an application of XML

1.<p>content</p> NOT <p>content

2.<p><em>content</em></p>

NOT

<em><p>content</em></p>

3.<br> becomes <br />

Page 25: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

CSS

•Presentation of HTML content•Control of fonts, colour, positioning and layout•Style sheets for different media and output devices•Can make global changes to style of a web site thus dramatically reducing workload•Users may override your style sheet with their own

Page 26: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Web Accessibility

•Legal Obligations - DDA,SENDA

•W3C, WAI, WCAG

•Levels of conformance to guidelines

•Ongoing project to improve practice within UCL

•See www.w3c.org/wai

Page 27: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Validation Tools

•Dreamweaver MX

•W3C Markup Validation Service http://validator.w3.org

•W3C CSS Validator

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

•Bobby (Bobby Worldwide)

http://bobby.watchfire.com/

Page 28: W EB F ORUM

UCLONLINE

Does the new design validate to all the standards?•Not quite•Designing for Netscape 4.0 - poor support for CSS in certain areas•Limitations of using Dreamweaver (and advantages of a Content Management System)•Production of guidelines and support from Web Unit (dissemination of good practice)

Page 30: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002

Page 31: W EB F ORUM

Introduction to Content Management at UCL

• Information strategy requires efficient access to accurate and timely information

• The web is a common, readily available access mechanism• Current web development methods require a large amount of

dedicated effort• A content management system can provide a flexible development

framework that enables information integration, dynamic web views and delegation of responsibility for content

UCLCMS

Anthony Peacock 11 December 2002

Page 32: W EB F ORUM

Introduction to Content Management at UCL

• Content Management Systems Working Group (CMSWG)• Three pilot projects

– Bartlett– Engineering– Registry

• Attendance at international conferences• Consulted with experts

UCLCMS

Anthony Peacock 11 December 2002

The process

Page 33: W EB F ORUM

Introduction to Content Management at UCL

• Zope• UCL supported server

– Test server being installed now– Development and production servers being specified and ordered

• Use of server for UCL ‘core’ pages• Development of service for other users

UCLCMS

Anthony Peacock 11 December 2002

The outcome

Page 34: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002

Page 35: W EB F ORUM

Engineering Sciences CMS: talk outline

• Background and boundaries• Content• Management• Site design• Why Zope/Plone?• Functionality• What’s missing• Conclusions

UCLCMS

Page 36: W EB F ORUM

Background and Boundaries

• 1997: online registration (EE)• 1998: online exam results (EE)• 2000 - 2001: paperless office (ENG)• 2001 - 2002: admissions (UCL)• early 2002: UCL website CMS• 2002 - 2003: student records (UCL)

UCLCMS

Page 37: W EB F ORUM

Content

• Student records

• Course records

• Dept information (teaching, research)

• Projects

• Admin (committees……)

• Audit trail, statistics

• Events

UCLCMS

Page 38: W EB F ORUM

Management

• Departments

• Faculty

• Central College

• Committees

• External agencies (QAA, ….)

UCLCMS

Page 39: W EB F ORUM

Site design

• Departments– programmes and modules– research

• Faculty– committees– projects– news– events

UCLCMS

Page 40: W EB F ORUM

Why Zope/Plone?

• remote authoring via browser

• workflow and version control

• open source, platform independent

• Zope: transactional object database

• Plone: useful tools (form handling, searching….)

• tailored for large organisations

UCLCMS

Page 41: W EB F ORUM

Functionality

• Structured documents

• Discussions: BB and comments

• News

• Events– deadlines– room bookings

• Topics

UCLCMS

Page 42: W EB F ORUM

What’s missing?

• Structured documents

• Workflow

• Audit trail (versions)

• Reports

UCLCMS

Page 43: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002

Page 44: W EB F ORUM

Bringing it all together

• Separation of content and design– Multi-purposing of content– Re-usability of content– Distributed authoring and workflow

• UCL ONLINE and Zope– Flexibility– Zope and Dreamweaver– Content provider interface– When?

UCLONLINE & UCLCMS

Page 45: W EB F ORUM

WEBFORUM11 December 2002