Journal of Engineering for Industry, Trans. ASME, Vol. 84, August, 1962 Paper No. 61-W A-llS W. J. O'DONNELL Associate Engineer, Westinghouse Bettis AtomicPowerlaboratory, Pittsburgh,Pa. Assoc.Mem.ASME B. F. LANGER ConsultingEngineer,WestinghouseBettis AtomicPowerlaboratory, Pittsburgh,Pa. FellowASME Design of Perforated Plates 1 This paper describes a method for calculating stresses and deflections in perJorated plates with a triangular penetration pattern. The method is based partly on theory and partly on experiment. Average ligament stresses are obtained from purely theoretical considerations but e.tfective elastic constants and peak stresses are derived from strain measurements and photoelast-ic tests. Acceptable limits for pressure stresses and ther- mal stresses in heat-exchanger tube sheets are also proposed. ----Nomenclature------------------------------ General Method o fA n a l y s i s radial and tangential stresses in equivalent solid circular plate, psi 0' r or 0'0, whichever has largest absolute value, psi stresses in minimum ligament section, Fig. 7, psi (Continued on lIe.Tt paoe) co-ordinates shown in Figs. 7 and 8, in. width of plate rim, Fig. 13, in. minimum ligament width, Fig. 6, in. minimum ligament width for thin ligament at mis- drilled holes, in. outside radius of plate rim, Fig. 13, in. distance between center lines of perforations, Fig. 6', in. radius of perforations, Fig. 6, in. plate thickness, in. U T' (TO p H X, Y,Z b 2h 2hmin The general method of evaluating stresses and deflections in a perforated plate having a triangular penetration pattern is: Step 1. Calculate the nominal bending and membrane stresses and deflections of an equivalent solid plate having the effective modified elastic constants E* and p* and the same dimensions as the perforated plate. Step 2. Calculate physically meaningful perforated-plate stress values from the nominal stress values in the equivalent solid plate from Step 1. Deflections of the perforated plate are the same as the deflections of the equivalent solid plate. "Yhen the perforated plate is part of a structure, as in the case of a heat exchanger, Step 1 is accomplished using classical structural-analysis methods. A study of the effective elastic con- stants for use in Step 1 is contained herein, and values based on ficiency of 20 per cent, as specified in Par. R-2.5 of reference [11]. 'When service conditions are usually severe or when the utmost is desired in reliability and optimum design, stresses should be cal- culated in detail and realistic allowable stress values should be set. It is the realization of this fact that led to the previous work and the work described in this paper. Most of the proposed methods for analyzing perforated plates have involved the concept of an "equivalent" solid plate [3, 4]. In one method the equivalent solid plate has the same dimensions as the actual plate but its flexural rigidity is reduced by a factor called its defleetion efficiency. In another method the equivalent plate is also the same as the solid plate, but it has fictitious elastic constants E* and p* in place of the actual constants of the material E and P. The latter concept is used in this paper. Stresses 1 This work is part of a dissertation suhmitted by W. J. O'Donnell to the University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the require- ments for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2 Numbers in brackets designate References at end of paper. 3 See, for example, reference [11],paragraphs R-7.122 and R-7.123. Contributed by the Petroleum Division for presentation at the Winter Annual Meeting, New York, N. Y., November 26-December 1, 1961, of THE AMERICANSOCIETY OF lvIECHANICAL ENGINEERS. Manuscript received at ASME Headquarters, July 26, 1961. Paper No. 61-WA-115. Material Properties D* E* H3/12 (1 - p*2), effective flexural rigidity of per- forated plate, lb-in. E elastic modulus of solid material, psi E* effective elastic modulus of perforated material, psi Sm - allowable membrane stress intensity of material, psi p Poisson's ratio of material, dimensionless p* effective Poisson's ratio for perforated material, dimen- sionless Pp Poisson's ratio of plastic-model material, dimensionless Pp * effective elastic modulus of perforated plastic models, di- mensionless O iT thermal expansion coefficient, in/in deg F Introduction TIm calculation of stresses in perforated plates is a subject which has received considerable attention as a result of the widespread use of flat tube sheets in heat-exchange equip- ment. Major contributions have been made by Horvay [1, 2],2 Malkin [3], Gardner [4, 5, 6], Duncan [7], Miller [8], Galletly and Snow [9], and Salerno and Mahoney [10]. Most of the pub- lished work has been limited to perforations arranged in an equilateral triangular pattern, and the present paper is no excep- tion. The Pressure Vessel Research Committee of the Welding Research Council is currently sponsoring work on square pat- terns of holes but no results are available as yet. Most heat-exchanger tube sheets are designed to meet the standards set by the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Associa- tion [11]. In these TEMA standards the thickness required to resist shear depends on the ligament efficiency of the perfora- tions, but the thickness required to resist bending is independent of ligament efficiency. S This does not mean, of course, that bending stress is not affected by ligament efficiency; it does mean, however, that all tube sheets designed to TEMA standards are designed to be safe with the minimum allowable ligament ef- Co-ordinatesand Dimensions l' = radial distance of ligament from center of circular per- forated plate, in. Discussion on this paper will be accepted at ASME Headquarters until January 10, 1962
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
UntitledTrans. ASME, Vol. 84, August, 1962
P ap e r N o .
61 -W A -llS
W . J . O 'D O N N E L L A ssoc ia te E ng ineer , W estin ghouse B
ett is
AtomicPower laboratory, Pittsburgh,Pa. Assoc.Mem.ASME
B . F . L A N G E R ConsultingEngineer,WestinghouseBettis
AtomicPower laboratory, Pittsburgh,Pa.
FellowASME
D es ig n o f P e r fo ra te d P la te s 1
Th is paper describes a method fo r ca lcu la ting stresses and
deflections in perJora ted
p la tes w ith a tr iangu la r penetra tion pa ttern . The method
isbased partly on theory and
partly on experim ent. Average ligament stresses are obta ined from
purely theoretica l
considera tions but e.tfective elastic constan ts and peak stresses
are derived from stra in
measurements and photoelast-ic tests. Acceptab le lim its fo r p
ressure stresses and ther-
m a l stresses in heat-exchanger tube sheets are a lso
proposed.
----N o m en c la tu re ------------------------------
G en e ra lM e th o do fA n a ly s is
radial and tangential stresses in equivalent solid circular plate,
psi
0 ' r or 0 '0 , whichever has largest absolute value, psi stresses
in minimum ligament section, Fig. 7, psi
(C o n t in u e d o n l Ie .T t p a o e )
co-ordinates shown in Figs. 7 and 8, in. width of plate rim, Fig.
13, in. minimum ligament width, Fig. 6, in. minimum ligament width
for thin ligament at mis-
drilled holes, in. outside radius of plate rim, Fig. 13, in.
distance between center lines of perforations, Fig. 6',
in. radius of perforations, Fig. 6, in. plate thickness, in.
U T' (TO
b
2h
2hmin
The general method of evaluating stresses and deflections in a
perforated plate having a triangular penetration pattern is:
Step1. Calculate the nominal bending and membrane stresses and
deflections of an equivalent solid plate having the effective
modified elastic constantsE* and p* and the same dimensions as the
perforated plate.
Step2. Calculate physically meaningful perforated-plate stress
values from the nominal stress values in the equivalent solid plate
from Step 1. Deflections of the perforated plate are the sameas the
deflections of the equivalent solid plate.
"Yhen the perforated plate is part of a structure, as in the case
of a heat exchanger, Step 1 is accomplished using classical
structural-analysis methods. A study of the effective elastic con-
stants for use in Step 1 is contained herein, and values
basedon
ficiency of 20 per cent, as specified in Par. R-2.5 of reference
[11]. 'When service conditions are usually severe or when the
utmost is desired in reliability and optimum design, stresses
shouldbe cal- culated in detail and realistic allowable stress
values should be set. It is the realization of this fact that led
to the previous work and the work described in this paper.
Most of the proposed methods for analyzing perforated plates have
involved the concept of an "equivalent" solid plate [3,4]. In one
method the equivalent solid plate has the same dimensions as the
actual plate but its flexural rigidity is reduced by a factor
called its defleetion efficiency. In another method the equivalent
plate is also the same as the solid plate, but it has fictitious
elastic constants E* and p* in place of the actual constants of the
material E and P . The latter concept is used in this paper.
S tresses
1 This work is part of a dissertation suhmitted by W. J. O'Donnell
to the University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the
require- ments for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
2 Numbers in brackets designate References at end of paper. 3 See,
for example, reference [11],paragraphs R-7.122 and R-7.123.
Contributed by the Petroleum Division for presentation at the
Winter Annual Meeting, New York, N. Y., November 26-December 1,
1961, of THE AMERICANSOCIETYOF lvIECHANICALENGINEERS. Manuscript
received at ASME Headquarters, July 26, 1961. Paper No.
61-WA-115.
Material Properties
D * E* H3/12 (1 - p*2), effective flexural rigidity of per- forated
plate, lb-in.
E elastic modulus of solid material, psi E* effective elastic
modulus of perforated material, psi Sm - allowable membrane stress
intensity of material, psi
p Poisson's ratio of material, dimensionless p* effective Poisson's
ratio for perforated material, dimen-
sionless Pp Poisson's ratio of plastic-model material,
dimensionless
Pp * effective elastic modulus of perforated plastic models, di-
mensionless
O iT thermal expansion coefficient, in/in deg F
In tro d u c t io n
TIm calculation of stresses in perforated plates is a subject which
has received considerable attention as a result of the widespread
use of flat tube sheets in heat-exchange equip- ment. Major
contributions have been made by Horvay [1, 2],2 Malkin [3], Gardner
[4, 5, 6], Duncan [7], Miller [8], Galletly and Snow [9], and
Salerno and Mahoney [10]. Most of the pub- lished work has been
limited to perforations arranged in an equilateral triangular
pattern, and the present paper is noexcep- tion. The Pressure
Vessel Research Committee of the Welding Research Council is
currently sponsoring work on square pat- terns of holes but no
results are available as yet.
Most heat-exchanger tube sheets are designed to meet the standards
set by the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Associa- tion [11]. In
these TEMA standards the thickness required to resist shear depends
on the ligament efficiency of the perfora- tions, but the thickness
required to resist bending is independent of ligament efficiency.S
This does not mean, of course, that bending stress is not affected
by ligament efficiency; it does mean, however, that all tube sheets
designed to TEMA standards are designed to be safe with the minimum
allowable ligament ef-
Co-ordinatesand Dimensions
l' = radial distance of ligament from center of circular per-
forated plate, in.
Discussion on this paper will be accepted at ASME Headquarters
until January 10, 1962
experimcntal results by Sampson are recommended. Methods of
evaluating average and peak ligament stresscs for Step 2 of the
analysis are developed and appropriate design limits are recom-
mended for these values. A method of evaluating the accepta- bility
of misplaced holes is also given.
E ffe c t iv e E la s t ic C o n s ta n ts fo r P e r fo ra te d P
la te s When a perforated plate is used as a part of a redundant
struc-
ture, the values used for the effective elastic constants will
affect calculated stresses in the remainder of the structure, as
well as in the perforated plate itself. For example, the amount of
rota- tion at the periphery of a steam-generator tube sheet depends
on the relative rigidity or the tube sheet with respect to the rest
of the heat exchanger. If effective elastic constants (particularly
E * ) which are too low are used in the analysis, the theoretical
rotation at the periphery of the tube sheet due to pressure loads
across the tube sheet will be greater than the actual rotation. The
calculated stresses at the periphery will then be lower thanthe
actual stresses. This can be seen from fig. 29 of reference [12].
Correspondingly, if an effective elastie modulus which is too high
is used in the analysis, the calculated pressure stresses atthe
center of the tube sheet would be low. If the tube sheet is taken
to be too rigid, the calculated stresses, due to a pressure drop
across the tube sheet, in the head and shell at their junction",;th
the tube sheet would be lower than the actual stresses. Since
stresses in these areas are usually among the highest stresses in a
heat exchanger, it is important that they be evaluated
properly.
Taking the tube sheet to be too flexible causes calculated ther-
mal-stress values in the tube sheet and in the remainder of the
heat exchanger to be below the actual stress values.
From the foregoing discussion it may be concluded that it is not
possible to insure conservatism in heat-exchanger or tube-sheet
stress calculations by assuming effective elastic constants which
are known to be either too high or too low. The best estimates of
p* and E* , rather than the highest or lowest estimates should be
used.
Many different sets of effective elastic constants for perforated
materials having a triangular penetration pattern have been
proposed. Five of the best known sets of values have been ob-
tained from theoretical considerations and two have been obtained
experimentally:
1 Theoretical Horvay plane stress [1]. 2 Theoretical Horvay bending
[2]. 3 Theoretical modified Horvay bending, corrected for
con-
strained warping by Salerno and Mahoney [10]. 4 Theoretical Malkin
bending [3].
5 Theoretical modified Malkin bending corrected forCOIl-
strained warping by Salerno and Mahoney [10]. 6 Experimental
Sampson plane stress []3]. 7 Experimental Sampson bending
[13].
The "plane-stress" constants apply to loads in the plane of the
perforated plate; i.e., tensile or compressive loads as opposed to
bending. All of the theoretieal values forE* and p* were intended
to apply only to those perforated materials having ligaments
thinner than those usually found in tube sheets. For example,
Horvay recommends his theory only for ligament efficienciesless
than 20 per cent.
S am p so n E ffe c t iv e E la s t ic C o n s ta n ts
The Sampson experimental values of the effective elastic con-
stants for both plane stress and bending loads were obtained in
tests on rectangular coupons at the~ T estinghouse Research
Laboratories. The test specimens were made of plastic material, p =
0.5. Subsequent tests were run to evaluate the effect of the
material Poisson's ratio on the values for the effective elastic
con- stants. Plane-stress constants were obtained by applying uni-
axial tensile loads, and bending constants were obtained byapply-
ing pure bending loads. These values were found to differ quite
markedly from the theoretical values.
The validity of the general method of using effective elastic
constants and stress multipliers to calculate stresses andde-
flections in tube sheets was checked by Leven in tests on per-
forated circular plates [14, ]5]. The plates were made of plastic
(p = 0.5) and were simply supported and uniformly loaded. Plate
deflections were measured and ligament stress variations along
radial sections were obtained. The results give support to the
validity of the Sampson experimental method of determin- ing the
effective elastic constants using perforated rectangular coupons
subject to uniaxial loads. The measured deflections agreed best
with those calculated using the effective elastic con- stants
obtained experimentally by Sampson. Moreover, the measured local
stresses agreed closely "ith those calculated using the
stress-ratio factors obtained by Sampson. Hence, the Samp- son
effective elastic constants are considered to be the most accurate
for use in design calculations.
The Sampson effective elastic constants for relatively thin plates
in bending differ significantly from those in plane stress.
However, as a plate in bending gets thicker, the stress gradient
through the depth gets smaller and it is reasonable to expectthat a
very thick plate would not be affected appreciably by the small
stress gradient in the thickness direction. Consequently,the
----N0menclature'----------------------------
K r value given in Fig. 13 K " , value given in Fig. 15 K u value
given in Fig. 10 for {3= 0
Y valuegiveninFig.]2
Others
F normal force carried uy ligament, Fig. 6, lb/in. 11 shear force
carried by ligament, Fig. 6, lb/in.
111 moment carried by ligament, Fig. 6, in-lb/in. P pressure on
plate surface under consirleration, psi
I1P pressure drop across tube-sheet, psi T p temperature at primary
tube-sheet, surface, deg F Ts temperature at secondary tube-sheet
surface, deg F T I l temperature of hot side of tube sheet, Fig.
14, deg F Tc temperature of cold side of tube sheet, Fig. 14, deg
F
f3 (jr /( jO or (jO /(jr whichever gives -1 <: f3 <: 1,
dimen- sionless
If angular orientation of ligament, Fig. 7, radians
stresses averaged through depth of plate, psi
(jeer
(Jrim
nominal bending plus membrane stress at inside of rim, psi
maximum principal stress basecI on average stresses across minimum
ligament section, psi
stress intensity based on stresses averaged across
minimum ligament section at plate surface, psi maximum local
stress, psi stress intensity based on stresses averaged
across
minimum ligament section and through depth of plate, psi
Stress Multipliers (dimensionless)
K value given in Fig. 10 K n = value given in Fig. 14
i1:u 0"11' T1/X' ur,uo
40 60 80100204 6 8 10
H/R
1-
h .1.--, ""'- .......••. 1\ R =
2R = PITCH OF TRIANGULAR HOLE PATTERN
2h = MINIMUM LIGAMENT WIDTH I I I II I I I I I I I I I I Io
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Fig.' Variation of Sampson effective elastic modulus with depth of
a plate in bending ( v p = 0.5 Poisson's ratio of solid
material)
I , I
I H
I
2h = MINIMUM LIGAMENT WIDTH
/ ~ I I -...r- -Lr lih I PLANE STRESS -
~ R .
3 ~
H/R
6 8 10 20 40 60 80100
Fig. 2 Variation of Sampson effective Poisson's ratio with adepth
of a plate in bending ( v p = 0.5 = Poisson's ratio of solid
material)
values for the effective elastic constants for a plate in bending
should approach the plane stress values as the plate gets thick.
Fig. 1shows the variation ofE* with the relative thickness of a
plate in bending, and Fig. 2 shows the same variation for/1 *
.
Note the rather abrupt transition in theE* IE -va lues that occur
in the vicinity of H IR = 4. This appears to be what might be
interpreted as a transition region between "thick" and "thin"
perforated plates.
Obviously, it would be inconvenient to use one set of elastic
constants for bending loads and another set for in-plane loads.
Fortunately, this is not necessary as long as the plate is thicker
than about twice the pitch of the perforations(H il l> 4) and
this situation occurs in most heavy-duty heat-exchange equip- ment
which requires the refined analysis described here. The effective
elastic cOllstants in bending forH IR > 4 do not differ greatly
from the plane-stress values. Fig. 3 shows the bending constants
atH il l = 7 plotted with the uniaxial plane-stress con- stants.
Accordingly, the plane-stress constants appear tobe the
most acceptable values for plates having a relative thicknes8 H
IR> 4.
Notice that the uniaxial plane-stress values of effective Pois-
son's ratios (/1 " ,* and /Iv *) vary with the orientation of the
load with respect to the hole pattern. The impracticality of
factoring this anisotropic behavior into the analysis is
immediatelyevi- dent, and values must be used which represent the
approximate Poisson's effect in all directions. This is not
considered to be a serious problem, however, partly because the
principal strel:iSes are generally not oriented in the directions
resulting in the largest
differences between the effective Poisson's ratios (thex and
y-
directions, respectively, in Fig. 3), and partly because these dif-
ferences do 1I0thave a large effeet on the calculated
stresses.
Sampson evaluated the effective elastic constants for perforated
plastic materials (/lp = 0.5) over a wide range of ligament ef-
ficiencies under bending and plane-stress loads. He then pro-
ceeded to evaluate the effect of material Poisson's ratio onthe
effective elastic constants. This was accomplished by
measuring
Journal of Engineering for Indllstry 3
4 Transactions of the AS !ViE
Before proceeding to the detailed calculation of stresses,it is
necessary to decide which stresses are significant and, conse-
quently, should be calculated and limited in order to assurean
adequate design. The peak stress in a perforated plate is not
necessarily the most significant one. Primary stresses, those which
are required to satisfy the simple laws of equilibrium of internal
and external forces, and are consequently not self-limiting, should
be the ones most severely limited. Secondary stresscs, those which
are only required to accommodate to an imposed strain pattern
(e.g., thermal expansion) can be allowed to go higher than primary
stresses. If the latter are kept lower than twice the yield
strength, loadings subsequent to the initial loadingwill produce
strains within the elastic limit. Peak stresses in localized
regions are of interest only if they are repeated often enough to
produce fatigue. For tube sheets, consideration must also be given
to distortion of the holes which may cause leakage around the
tube.
The use of the maximum-shear theory of failure rather than the
m(lximum-st,ress theory of failure is recommended. In order
to
P ro p o sed S tre s s L im its
0.1
1.2
0.2
1.1
1.0 p* : v t[O .4343(VpIV -11 (Lnh/R+2.3026l+lr'
0.9 WHERE: vt 6 vp = POISSON'S RATIOS FOR PLASTIC(v:O.5
v* 6v : POISSON'S RATIOS FOR METALS
0.3
LIGAMENT EFFICIENCY h/R
"-"- *,."0.4
0.7
0.8
always arises regarding the degree to which the tubes increase the
stiffness of the plate. As mentioned previously, it is not always
conservative to assume either a maximum or a minimum value for the
stiffness. In some strain-gage tests by A. Lohmeier, of the
'Vestinghouse Steam Division, on a steam generator which had seen
considerable service, very good correlation was obtained between
calculated and measured sti'esses when full creditwas taken for the
tube wall in the caleulations; that is, when thehole size was taken
as the ID rather than the OD of the tubes [16]. When the ligament
effic.iencywas calculated on the basis ofthe OD of the tubes, the
measured stresses due to pressure loading averaged about 75 per
cent lower than the calculated values. While this one test cannot
be considered as conclusive evidence, the authors believe that it
is a strong indication. Furthermore, it can be shown that sinee the
membrane stresses in the tube sheet are usually low, very little
residual compression is required in the tube wall to make it follow
the strains in the drilled hole. Therefore the authors tentatively
recommend that fuJI credit be taken for the tube-wall thickness.
Further confirmatory tests are planned.
F ig .4 E ffec t o f m a ter ia l P o isson 's ra t io II on effec
tive Po isson 's ra t io v*
E*/E
LIGAMENT EFFICIENCY, h/R
~2h<l•... V >
U
0.2
0.1
the effective elastic constants of an aluminum specimen( I I
=
0.327) in pure bending. The specimen had a relative thickness in
the range of "thick plates"(H IR = 7). Hence, the test values
obtained from this specimen are felt to be applicable in the entire
range of parameters(H IR > 4), and for plane-stress loads as
well as bending loads. Based on these test values, correlations
were established on an empirical basis to estimate values ofthe
effective elastic constants for any material and for any ligament
efficiency. This relation is given in Fig. 4. The maximum devia-
tion of any of the aluminum-bar test points from. this empirical
relation is 7 per cent. The corresponding relation betweenp*
for steels ( I I = 0.3) and I Ip * for plastic ( l ip = 0.5) was
used to modify the Sampson plane-stress II*-values obtained in
tests on plastic specimens in order to obtain corresponding values
applica- ble to metal plates. The resulting values of1 1 * for I I
= 0.3 are recommended for use in design calculations. These values
are given in Fig. 5. They can be used for both plane stress and
bending loads in the plate, as discussed previously.
The effective elastic-madulus ratiosE* I E were found to be
unaffected by changes in the Poisson's ratio of the material.
Hence, the Sampson plane-stress values ofE* IE , taken from Fig. 3,
are recommended for use in design calculations. These values are
also given in Fig. 5.
The smallest ligament efficiency of the coupons tested by Sampson
was 15 per cent. Hence, the values given in Fig. 5 ~hould not be
extrapolated much below this value.
The error in stress values calculated using the general effective
elastic constants given in Fig. 5 instead of the constants measured
by Sampson (which depend on the type of loading, direction of
loading, and the thickness of the plate) was evaluated. The larg-
est error in the maximum local stresses or in the maximum average
ligament stresses that are limited by the design criteria recom-
mended herein for any type or direction of loading and any plate
thickness(H IR > 4) was found to be 8 per cent.
W ffe n in g E ffe c t o f T u b e s
When tubes are rolled or welded into a tube sheet, the
question
Fig. 3 Comporison of Sompson effective elostic constants for
bending and plane stress
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80.9 1.0
h/R, LIGAMENT EFFICIENCY
z 0 0.6u u I- en 0.5 <t .-J W
W > 0.4 I- u W lJ.. lJ.. 0.3w
D*/D E*/E 0.2
0.9
1.0
Fig. 5 Effective elastic constants for perforated plates
make allowable shear-stress values comparable to the more familiar
tensile values, calculated stresses are expressed in terms of two
times the maximum slWar stress; which is the largest alge- braic
difference between any"two of the three principal stresses. This
quantity is called the "equivalent intensity of combined stress,"
or more briefly, the "stress intensity."
The following stress limits are proposed:
1 Typical Ligament in a Uniform Pattern
(a ) llfechan ica l Loads (i.e., pressure loads but not thermal
loads):
(i) The stress intensity based on stresses averaged across the
minimum ligament sectionand through the thickness of the plate
should be limited to prevent stretching of the plate. This stress
is analogous to the average stress intensity in the shell of apres-
sure vessel under internal pressure and, consequently, should be
limited to a value about t.he same as the allowable stress values
in t.he ASME Boiler Code. (The quest.ion of whether or not the
values in t.he 1959 edition of t.he Code are t.oo conservative for
vessels which are analyzed carefully for high stress is beyond the
scope of this paper. In t.he 1959 Code, the allowable stresses do
not exceed 5/8 of the yield strength of a ferrous material or 2/3
of
the yield strength of a nonferrous material.) Let us call thi~
basic st.ress intensity allowanceSm .
(ii) The stress intensity based on stresses averaged acrossthe
minimum ligament section butnot through the thickness of the plate
should be limited to prevent excessive deflection. This stress is
the sum of membrane plus bending effects and, sincethe limit-design
factors for flat plates are greater t.han 1.5,it can safely be
allowed to reach a value of 1.5Sm .
(b) Combined ilfechan i-ea l and Thermal Loads:
(i) The stress intensity based on stresses averaged across the
minimum ligament section but not through the depth should be
limited to 3 Sm .
(ii) The peak stress intensity at any point due to any
loading
should be limited by cumuintivc fatigue considerations, asde-
scribed in [17].
2 Isolated or Thin Ligament. If a high stress occurs in a single
ligament due to a misdrilled hole, the foregoing limits may be re-
laxed. For combined pressure and thermal loads, the stress in-
tensity based on average stresses in the ligament cross seet-ion
should be limited to 3S " , and peak stresses must. still, of
course, be subject to fatigue evaluation.
Journal of Engineering tor Industry 5
F = 2 ( r rT cos I / ; )R cos I/; + 2 [ lIo cos(I/; - 7 l" /2 ) ]R
cos(I/; - 7l"/2)
(1)
A n a ly s is o f A v e ra g e L ig am en t S tre s s In te n s it
ie s a t S u r fa c e s o f P la te
(4)
(3) 1 flL R
- rr d x = - [rr cos2 I/; + IIO sin2 1/;] 2h - IL y h T
1 flL R (Tyz).Vg = - Tyz d x = - [ ( r rT - r ro ) sin I/;
cos1/;]
2h - IL h
and
In order to specify completely the state of stress in a minimum
ligament section and to evaluate the ligament stress intensities
(maximum-shear stresses) that are limited by the design criterion,
something must be known about the stresses transverse to th"
ligament at the minimum ligament section rrx ' A three-dimen-
sional view of a ligament is shown in Fig.8 (a ) . The average
stresses acting on an element at a surface of the plate are shown
in Fig. 8 (b ) . The three-dimensional Mohr circle based on these
average stresses, given by equations (3) and (4), is shown in Fig.
9. The Mohr circle, assuming zero transverSe stressrr x,
i.e.,
Hence, the average stresses in a ligament at any arbitrary angle
I/; ,,·;th the principal directions of the equivalent solid plate
stresses rrT and r ro (as shown in Fig . .7)are given by
v = 2(rr T sin I / ; )R cos I/;
+ 2 [r ro sin (I/; - 7 l" /2 ) ]R cos(I/; - 7l"/2) (2)
in the equivalent solid plate. This stress field must be carried by
the minimum ligament sections. Since there is no variation of
stress from hole to hole, no net moment is supported by the cut
section. Hence, the moments in the minimum ligament sections M ·
must be zero. Since the orientation of the cut is arbitrary, it is
apparent that the sidesway momentsI I I are zero in all minimum
ligament sections.
Yielding would tend to produce a uniform distribution of stress
across the minimum ligament sections. Hence, in this analysis a
three-dimensional element, subject to the average shear and ten-
sile stresses in the minimum ligament section, is analyzed in order
to evaluate the average stress intensities which are limited by the
proposed design criterion.
Having the principal stressesl IT and r ro at either surface of the
equivalent solid plate, the problem of evaluating loadsin the
minimum ligament sections becomes statically determinate. The
resultant load carried by the ligaments must be equal to the re-
sultant load carried by the equivalent solid plate. The loads
carried by the ligaments, as shown in Fig. 6, are then given
by
From the foregoing we see that three stress intensities should be
calculated:
(1) Average in ligament cross section, calledSerr
(2) Average across ligament width at plate surface,
calledrrerr
(3) Peak, called rrmax
A n a ly s is o f L ig am en t S tre s s In te n s it ie s
Expressions for the average ligament stress intensities,
limited
by the design criteria suggested in the foregoing, are derived in
this section from purely theoretical considerations. The analysis
is quite general and can be used for any biall.;ality condition of
the stress field in the equivalent solid plate, and for any
ligament orientation in the stress field. The accuracy of
simplifying as- sumptions used in the analysis is examined using
photoelastic test results. The analytical results are simplified
and presented in a form suitable for design calculations.
In the concept of an equivalent solid plate, as considered herein,
stresses and deflections of a solid plate having the effective
elastic properties of the perforated material are evaluated.
Thereis a unique state of stress within a body having a given set
of elastic properties and subject to a particular load. Therefore,
thestress field in an equivalent solid plate is the same as the
stress field in the perforated plate on the same macroscopic scale
for whichthe effective elastic constants were evaluated. Hence, the
resultant loads carried by ligaments (at any arbitrary depth in the
tube sheet) at any particular location must be equal to the
resultant of the load carried by the equivalent solid plate. This
is the basis of the analytical approach presented herein.
In perforated plates such as tube sheets, the perforations and
ligaments are quite small relative to the over-all dimensions of
the plate itself. As a result, the rate of change of the tangential
and radial stresses with radial position in the equivalent solid
plate (given by classical circular-plate theory) is small relative
to the perforations. Hence, one can assume that there exists only a
negligible variation of load from any ligament to its adjacent
parallel ligaments. Under these conditions, there are no sidesway
bending moments in the minimum ligament sections. This can be seen
by considering the equilibrium of an arbitrary cut atthe surface,
or at any arbitrary depth of the plate, as shown in Fig. 6. The
stress field in the equivalent solid plate is given byr rT and r
ro
where the radial and tangential directions are principal
directions
Fig. 6 Loads aeling on a typical seelion Fig. 7 Stresses in a
typical ligament
6 Transactions of the AS M [
I x I
OR SECONDARY SURFACE
(0) 3- DIMENSIONAL VIEW OF LIGAMENT (e) AVERAGE STRESSES
AVERAGED
THROUGH DEPTH
ACTUAL STRESSES IN PLANE OF TUBE SHEET
ACTUAL STRESSES IN PRINCIPAL TRANSVERSE PLANES CALCULATED STRESSES
IN PLANE OF TUBE SHEET ASSUMING PLANE STRESS..
tT
"-( O,'t"yx) --- :::-- (CTX,"yX)--
Fig. 9 Three-dimensional Mohr circle for stresses averagedacross m
in im um ligam en t sec tion a t su ;:face o f p e r fo ra te d p
la te
plane stress, is also shown for the plane of maximum shear. For
purposes of this analysis, the transverse stresses0 " x will be
taken equal to zero. The significance of this important assumption
will be explained subsequently. The corresponding maximum princi-
pal stress, based on the average value of the stresses acrossthe
minimum ligament section, is given by
~ {O "r cos21/; + 0"0 sin2 if; h 2
The comparable expression for the stress intensity (twice the
maximum shear stress) in the minimum ligament section is given
by
where (J"cff is the stress intensity limited by the design
criterion. Equation (6) gives the stress intensity based on the
average
stress across any particular minimum ligament section for any
ligament orientation if; at either surface of the plate.
Consider the significance of assuming a zero transverse stress at
the minimum ligament section. Obviously, the transverse stress must
be zero at the edges of the minimum ligament section. Moreover,
this stress is usually small, even at the center ofthe ligament.
Photoelastic tests [18] have shown that the average transverse
stress usually has the same sign as the average longi- tudinal
stress, as shown in Fig. 9. When these stresses have the same sign,
the calculated value of the stress intensity in the plane of the
plate, based on stresses averaged across the minimum ligament
section, will always be equal to or greater than the correct value
of the stress intensity in that plane. This is il- lustrated in
Fig. 9.
There are conditions for which the maximum shear does not occur in
the plane of the plate. This happens when the minimum principal
stress in the plane of the plate has the same sign asthe maximum
principal stress in that plane (the transverse shear stresses being
zero at the surfaces). The maximum shear can then be found by
rotat.ing the element in the principal plane perpen- dicular t.o
the plat.e because t.he difference bet.ween themaximum principal
st.ress and the zero Z-direction stress' is great.er t.han
t.he difference between any other principal stresses. However, the
maximum shear st.resses in t.he plane of t.he plate calculated
by
J'h}+ (O "T - 0 "0 )2 COS2 if; sin2 if;
Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Thc Z-dircction stress due to pressure acting at the surface of a
plate is attenuated a short distance from the surface in the manner
of a bearing stress. Hence, although this stress should be
considered in the fatigue analysis of local peak stresses, it need
not be considered in
(5) the average stress-intensity limitations because the latter are
only intended to prevent excessiveyielding and deformation.
7
where
A n a ly s is o f l ig am en t S tre s s In te n s it ie s A ve ra
g ed T h ro u g h
D ep th o f P la te The value of (T , averaged through the depth of
a plate at any
location is equal to the value of00 averaged through the depth at
that location. Moreover, these average values do not vary with
location in a symmetrically loaded circular plate because they are
produced by membrane-type loads. From equation (4), the average
shear stress in the plane of the plate due to membrane
(8)
ligament stress intensity based on stresses averaged across minimum
ligament section at either plate surface
value given in Fig.10 reciprocal of ligament efficiency, Fig. 6 a ,
or (T o , whichever has the largest absolute value.
(For example, if(T , = -3000 psi and(T o = 2500 psi, then (T , =
-3000 psi and / (T , j = 3000 psi)
stresses at either surface of equivalent solid plate ob- tained
from Step1of analysis
To calculate ligament stress intensities based on stresses averaged
across the \\idth of the ligament but not through the depth of the
plate, substitute the values of(T , and (T O at the surface of the
plate into equation (8). The K-values for equation (8), given in
Fig. 10, depend on the biaxiality of the stress field and vary with
radial location in the plate. The resulting stressin- tensities
will, of course, vary from one side of the plate to the other and
will depend on the radial location in the plate.
Since equation (8) was developed by maximizing the stress in-
tensity with respect to the angular orientation of the ligament, it
may be overly conservative for plates having a small number of
holes. As previously pointed out, the stresses near the center of
the plate do not depend on the angular orientation of the ligament
because the stress field is isotropic. However, it may be worth
while to evaluate ligament stresses individually when the limiting
value given by equation (8) occurs at the periphery of a plate
having a small number of holes. Equation (6) gives the stressin a
ligament having an arbitrary angular orientationif;.
with respect to if; for tube-sheet design calculations without in-
troducing undue conservatism. The resulting expression should be
used to obtain stress inteusities for typical ligaments in a uni-
form pattern, !":ither than for isolated ligaments. The expression
for the orientation which gives the maximum skess intensityis given
by
- (T r ' cos3 if; sin if; + 002 sin3 if; cos if;
+ (0 ,2 - j- (T , (T O + (T 0 2 ) sin 2if; cos2l/J = 0 (7)
From equations (6) and (7) it is possible to evaluate ligament
stress intensities, maximized \\ith respect, to angular orientation
in the stress field, for any ligament effieiency and any biaxiality
condition. These equations can be written as functions of the
biaxiality ratio fJ = (T , / (T o or (T o /a " whichever gives-1 ~
fJ ~ l.
1 = 1 for isotropic loads
fJ = 0 for uniaxial loads = -1 for pure shear
Equation (7), written in terms offJ , was used to find the orien-
tation if; which gives the maximum average ligament stress in-
tensity in a stress field of biaxialityfJ . This orientation was
then used in equation (6) to evaluate the corresponding value of
the average stress intensity. The resulting values are given
by:
assuming plane stresl'; are always equal to, or greater than, the
actual maximum shear stresses in any other plane. This can be seen
by again considering the aet-ual three-dimensionrL! Mohr circle, as
shown in Fig. 9. Hence, it is not necessary to write equations for
the shear stresses in planes other than the plane of the plate,
provided that zero transverse stress(T " is assumed at the minimum
ligament sections.
At the center of a circular perforated plate the stress fieldin the
equivalent solid p1a.te is isotropic. Hence, as indicated by equa-
tion (4), there are no shear stressesTy" acting at the minimum
ligament section. The maximum shear stress in this ('.ase (found by
rotating the element as previously described) acts on a plane at 45
deg to the plane of the plate. The theoretical expression for the
maximum shear stress assuming plane stress in the minimum ligament
section then gives the correct value for the actual maximum shear
stress, even though the latter does not occur in the plane of the
p1a.te. Hence, the theoretical approach used herein gives the exact
values of average stress intensities in ligaments near the center
of a circular perforated plate regard- less of the magnitude of the
transverse stresses in the minimum ligament sections.
At the edge of a circular plate, however, high stresses may exist
under any biaxiality conditions. For many of these con- ditions,
the maximum shear stress occurs in thc plane of the plate, as
illustrated in Fig. 9. The equation for the average stressin-
tensity across the minimum ligament section, equation (6),then
gives values which are higher than the actual values for many
ligament orientations because of the assumption of zero trans-
verse stress in the ligaments. The significance of this error was
evaluated by making use of measured values of the transverse stress
CJ'" obtained photoelastically by Sampson [18].
The error for a perforated plate under tensile loading having a
ligament efficiency of 25 per cent and a minimwn ligament width of
0.25 in., was evaluated. The maximum error for any bi- axiality
condition and any orientation of the ligament in the stress field
was fOlIDdto be less than 3 per cent. This error increases with
increasing ligament efficiencies. For a plate having a ligament
efficiency of 50 per cent and a minimum ligament width of 0.5 in.,
the maximum error was found to be 5 per cent. These errors might
tend to be greater for bending loads on relatively thin plates than
for the tensile loads used in the photoelastic tests. However,
epoxy resin having a Poisson's ratio of 0.5 was used in the
photoelastic tests and the resulting transversestresses were
probably higher than they would be for metals. Hence, the maximum
error in the calculated stress-intensity values isproba- bly no
greater in a metal plate than the error evaluated herein from photo
elastic tests on plastic models.
The equation for the average stress intensity in the minimum
ligament section, equation (6), Inay be simplified furtherfor de-
sign calculations by consiaering the symmetry of the hexagonal
array of neighboring holes surrounding the typical hole. Itis
apparent that the same stress distributions would result ifthe
orientation of the ligaments were shifted ±60 deg in the equiva-
lent solid-plate stress field, the actual stress distribution in
the ligaments also being shifted ±60 deg. Consequently, at least
two of the ligaments surrounding the typical hole pattern will be
at most 30 deg rotated from that orientation which would produce
the maximum stress intensity in the minimum ligament section. Near
the cent.er of a symmetriC<'1.llyloaded circular plate, the
stress field is very nearly isotropic and the orientation of a
particular ligament does not affect the stresses in that ligament
appreciably. Near the periphery of a plate such as a tube sheet
which contains a large number of holes, the angular orientation of
the hole pat- terns "ith respect to the radii of the plate varies
graduallyaround the periphery, encompassing the entire range of
possible orienta- tions. From these considerations,it is apparent
that the expres- sion for tbe stress intensity, equation (6), can
be maximized
8 T ra n s a c t io n s o f the A S M E
K
2.0
1.9
>- !:: 1.6 (J)
~ 1.2
1.1
1.0
CTr8CT8=STRESSES IN EQUIVALENT SOLID PLATE
CT,= CTror CT8(WHICHEVER HAS THE
LARGEST ABSOLUTE VALUE)
8 CT
r
0.8 - 1.0 - 0.8 -0.6 -0.4 - 0.2 0+ 0.2 +0.4 +0.6 + 0.8+ 1.0
(3, BIAXIALITY RATIO
Fig. 10 Stress intensities in perforated-plate ligaments
loads T liZ is zero at the mllllmum ligament sections. The
transverse shear stress averaged through the depthT lI' varies
linearly with radial locationr in a circular plate.
Fig. 8 (c ) shows an element subject to the shear and tensile
stresses averaged across the minimum ligament section and averaged
through the depth of the plate. The three-dimen- sionai Mohr circle
based on these stress values is shown in Fig. 11. Since the
transverse stress in the ligamentiT z has the same sign as the
longitudinal stressiT ; (as previously discussed), it is apparent
that the maximum shear stress -due to membrane loads can be found
by rotating an '~lement in the principal plane sub- ject to the
transverse shearT il'. The average stress intensity in a ligament
at any radial distancer from the center of the plate is given
by
R [(AP r)' J '/' (ma,.'I:with r = radius Self = - -- + ( iT r )2 .
(9)
h H to outermost lIgament)
where
AP pressure drop across plate r = radial distance of ligament from
center of plate
iT r = iT o stresses averaged through depth of equivalent solid
plate
H thickness of plate
Peak Stresses in Perforated Plates Maximwn local stresses due to
all loads (mechanicltl and
Journal of Engineering for Industry
- STRESSES IN PRINCIPAL PLANE OF MAXIMUM SHEAR STRESS
- STRESSES IN OTHER PRINCIPAL PLANES
Fig. 11 Three-dimensional Mohr circle for stresses averaged
across
minimum ligament section and averaged through depth of plate
thermal) are also limited by the suggested design criteria of this
paper. These stresses can be evaluated from the known stresses in
the equivalent solid plate using the stress multipliers obtained
photoelastically by Sampson. A minor correction was made on these
multipliers to account for the nonlinearity of the stress
dis-
9
30
28
26
24
22
~20 )(
0
10
8
6
4
2
CTmax = Y CTI
\ SOLID PLATE
CT 1 ~
\ fir I
'\. \ q~'\. 1\ '\. \ 2h,
\ I I I '"
'" ~UNI~XI~L ,S~R~S~(f3= ~ )
"""-. "" .-/ "
..•.•..••.. " /'
..•••..•... ~ ..•.. "-....•.•..•.../ " ....... ~ ..............
.....•.. •••• .•..~ ~ ...-
0""'-- -- ---- o 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.70.80.9 1.0
h/R, LIGAMENT EFFICIENCY
Fig. 12 Maximum local stresses in perforated plotes
tribution through the thickness of the coupons used by Sampson. The
multipliers Yare functions of the biaxiality of the stress field in
the equivalent solid-platefJ = ( J r / ( J o or ( J o / ( J r
(whichever gives -1 ~ fJ ~ ). This ratio varies, of course, with
radialloca- tion in the plate. The maximum stress for any
particular thermal or pressure load is then given by the
relation:
(10)
where
( J 1 (J r or ( J o (whichever has the largest absolute value) Y
value given in Fig. 12 P pressure acting on surface
All thermally induced maximum local stresses, as well as pres- sure
stresses, must be considered in the cumulative fatiguelimita- tions
on the values of( J m ,, ' The values given by equation (10) are
the peak stresses throughout the perforated portion of the
plate.
Most perforated circular plates have unperforated rims. Pho-
10
toelastic tests on tube-sheet models have revealed the existence of
high local stresses at the perforations adjacent to the rim (15].
These peak stresses appear to be due to the influence of the rim
and cannot be calculated by equation (10), but may be approxi-
mated by the expression
(11 )
where
(Jrim nominal bending plus membrane stress at inside of rim
[ (r value given in Fig. 13
(Jrim is evaluated in Step 1 of the general analytical
approach,
the rim being treated as a plate or ring depending on its dimen-
sions.
The Kr-values in Fig. 13 were derived from known values of stress
concentration in a bar with a semicircular notch5 and were checked
against the photoelastic results of Sampson and Leven.
5 Reference [191. figs. 15.35.85. and 86.
Transactions of the UME
O'"mox =K rC"'nm
, I I I I I I I II CTMAX = KOO"NOM 1- j-D-j-
I I I (!)p ~o-
\ EaT(TH-Tc) 0 50_
Tc o O"MAX ~o-
\ o ~o 0 ~o_
ti 1.8
§2.6 b~
~2.4
b
Evaluation of Special Cases of Thermally Induced Stresses in Tube
Sheets
.02 .04 .06.08 .10 .12 .14 .1618 .20.22 .24 .26 .28.30
P o
Fig. 14 Peak thermal stresses at perforations adjacent to a
diametrallane
where
K " uniaxial (/3 = 0) stress multiplier from Fig. 12 E* effective
elastic modulus for tube sheet
The stresses at the edges of the holes adjacent to the unper-
a T thermal expansion coefficient, in/in/deg F T p primary
temperature, deg F T / metal telnperature, at secondary tube-sheet
surface,
deg F 0
(l4) KDEaT(TH - 7 '.)
2(1 - II) ([max
where
Evaluation of Acceptability of Improperly Drilled Holes The
presence of a particular out-of-tolerance thin ligament will
result in increased peak stresses and increased ligament stress
intensities. A method which can be used to determine how far a hole
can be drilled from its normal position in a hole pattern without
exceeding the proposed stress limits is developed in this section.
Since these increases occur only at thin ligamentsin nominally
uniform patterns, the stresses in these ligaments are limited by
the less restrictive criteria previously described.
Transverse shear loads as well as loads in the plane of the tube
sheet contribute to the stress intensity based on stresses
averaged
across the width of the ligament and through the depth of the
plate. Hence, it would be extremely difficult to evaluate the
effect of load redistribution caused by the existence of a
particular ligament being thinner than average. To be safe, it must
be as- sumed that there is no redistribution of load to nearby
ligaments. The limited stress intensity in a particular
out-of-tolerance liga- ment can then be evaluat-ed by substituting
the smallest ligament
G Reference [191. figs. 20, 21, and 32.
K D = stress-concentration factor from Fig. 14 E , II = material
properties of tube sheet
The KD-values given in Fig. 14 were derived from known values of
stress concentration in a bar with a row of semicircular notches.6
These values apply over the entire range of ligament efficiencies
:::;60 per cent.
forated diametrallane, Fig. 14, can be approximated by assum- ing a
linear temperature drop across the diametrallane:
(13)
(12)
O"max
where
Thermal "Skin Effect." In heat exchangers, the major part of the
tube-sheet thickness is at the primary temperature by virtue of the
perforations through which the primary fluid passes. The difference
in temperature hetween the primary and secondary sides of the tube
sheet occurs very near the secondary surface, resulting in what is
commonly called a thermal skin effect. Be- cause of the thermal
film drop, the entire difference between the primary and secondary
fluid bulk temperatures does not con- tribute to the skin effect.
Credit may be taken for the tempera- ture drop in the thermal
boundary layer at the secondary sideof the tube sheet when this
drop can be evaluated. Stresses due to this effect are given
by
Stresses for Temperature Drop Across Diametral Lane of U-Tube
Type
Steam-Generator Tube Sheet. In the case of a U-tube type steam
generator, the unperforated diametral lane separates the inlet and
outlet sides of the tube sheet, and large thermal stresses may
arise because of a temperature difference between these sides. The
resulting maximum local stresses in the ligaments of the tube sheet
can be approximated by
Journal of Engineering for Industry 11
I '. I I I I I I
1/ Kmh'~"1 Q
"""'"
~ ~ ~ -
I I I I I I I I I I I
3.4
3.2
3.0
2.8
~-J 2.2
ZZ
~~ 1.2 «<l: ww 0..0.. 1.0 ;;e
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
hmln REDUCED LIGAMENT WIDTH -h-" NORMAL LIGAMENT WIDTH
Increase of peak slress due10 misplaced hole
width at the misplaced hole into elJuation (9). The resulting
stress value is limited to 3S " "
The ma),i/lllJlll local stresses tlue(,0 all loatls (mcchanical
alltl thermal) ill tm iso!:J.tedor thin ligament in a nominally
uniform pattcrn are limitlxl by fatigue considerations in the same
manner as the peak stresses ill a typical ligament in a uniform
pattern. The increase in the Joeal stresses caused by the presenee
of apar- ticular out-of-tolerance thin ligamen(, was evaluated in
photo- elastic tests. The inerease in peak stresses was found to be
a function of the biaxiality of the stress field, and the direction
of the displacement of the misdrilled hole with respect to the hole
pattern, as expected. The variation of the increasc in peak
stresses \dth Jig:uneut efTiciclll'Ywas foulld(,0 be small. The
maximum increase in local stresses occurred when the hole wa~
displaced at 30 deg to the line of hole centers. Using the results
for this ease, the maximum loeal st.ress in a.thin ligament is
given by
(15)
where
<TI < T r or < T o (whiehever has t.he largest absolute
value) K", value given in Fig. 15
P pressure acting on surraee Y value given in Fig. 12
The K",-v:tlue givcn in Fig. 15 can be used for any ligament
efficieney.
S u m m a ry an d C o n c lu s io n s
1 Effeetive elastic constants for both plane stress and bending
loads for any plate thickness(H /R > 4) are given in Fig.
5.
2 A complete structural-design criterion for perforated plates is
proposed. The limited stress values are summarized in the following
table for a nominal ligament in a uniform pattern.
';' ( Peak ill ligaments Cyclic thermal (temperature 1
difference across diametral Peak at holes adj:tcent lane)
lane
Load
Pressure
I face of plate
Average across ligament at either sur- face of plate
{
Peak at surface
12
o Equation (8) was obtain cd by maximizing thc stress intensity
with respect to the angular orienta- tion of the ligament. If the
plate contains only a small number of holes and if the limiting
stresses occur at the periphery of the plate, a more accurate
evaluation of this stress intensity. which takes into account the
angular orientation of the ligament may be justified. Equation (6)
gives the corresponding stress intensity in a ligament with any
angular orientationf . The maximnm value of this stres>;irl-
tensity for all ligaments should be limited as indicated in the
table.
TransacHons of the AS M E
J o u rn a l o i E n g in e e r in g fo r In d u s try
Equation
(15)
holes is given. The relevant stresses and their proposed
limits
are given in the following table.
Limit
3S",
Cumulative fatigue
3 1. Malkin, "Notes on a Theoretical Basis for Design of Tube
Shects of Triangular Layout," TRANS. ASME, vol. 74, 1952, pp.
387-396.
13
l"'inted in U. S. A.
4 K. A. Gardner, "Heat Exchanger Tube Sheet Design," ,Journa l o f
App lied 111echan ics,vol. 15, TRANS.ASME, vol. 70, 1948, pp.
377-385.
5 K. A. Gardncr, "I-Ieat E.'xchanger Tube Sheet Design-2, Fixed
Tube Sheets,"Jo ttrua l o f App lied J llechan ics, vol. HI,
TUANS.ASME, vol. 74, 1952, pp. 159-lG6.
6 K. A. Gardner, "Heat Exchanger Tuhe Sheet Design-3, U-Tube and
Bayonet Tube Sheets,"Journa l o f AP1Jlied 111eehan ics,
vol. 27, TRANS.ASME, Series E, vol. 82, 1960, pp. 25-33. 7 J. P.
Duncan, "The Structural Efficiency of Tube Plates for
Heat Exchangers," P roc:eerlings, I. 111eeh. E ., vol. 169, 1955,
pp. 789-810.
8 K. A. G. i\liJler, "The Design of Tube Plates in Heat Ex-
changers," P roceed ings, I. ilIech . E ., vol. 1 13, 1952, pp.
215-231.
9 G. D. Gallet!y and D. It. Snow, "Some Results on Con- tinuously
Drilled Fixed Tube Plates," IJresented at the ASME Petroleulll
Conference, Nmv Orleans, La., September, 1960, Paper No.
60-Pet-16.
10 V. L. Salerllo and J.B. i\fal1OlIcy, "A Heview, Comparison and
i\ Codification of Presen t Deflection Theory for Flat Perforated
Plates," Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 52, July,
1959.
11 "Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Associa- tion,"
fourth edition, Tubular Exc:hanger Manufacturers Association, New
York, N. Y., 1959.
12 S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger, "Theory of Plates aud
Shells," second edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company. Inc., New York,
N. Y., 1959, p. 5(;.
13 R. C. Sampson, "Photoe1asti<.: Frozen Stress Study of the
Effective Elastic Constants of Perforated Materials, A Progress
Report," WAPD-DLE-3f9, May, 1959; available from Office of
Teehni<.:al Service, Department of Commerce, \Vashington25, D.
C.
14 i\if. i\L Levell, "Preliminary Report on Deflection of Tube
Shel,ts," vVAPD-DLE-320, i\Jay, 1959; available from Offiee of
Technical Serviees, Departmcnt of eOlTlIlIer<.:e,vVashington 25,
D. C.
15 i\f. lVI, Leven, "Photoelastic Determinat.iolT of Stresses in
Tube Sheets and COlllparison "Tith Calculated Value'S," Bettis
Tech- nical Review, vVAPD-BT-1S, April, 1960; available from Office
of Technical Services, Department of Commerce, \Vashington 25, D.
C.
I6 W. J. O'Donnell, "The Effect of the Tubes on Stresses and
Deflections in U-Tube Steam Generator Tube Steets," BettisTech-
nical Review, \VAPD-BT-21, Novembe'r, 1960; available from Office
of Teehnieal Services, Department of Commerce, vVashington 25, D.
C.
17 B. F. Langer, "Design Values fol' Thermal Stress in Ductile
iVlaterials,', ASi\IE Paper No. 58-Met-l, The W eld ina Joumal, Re-
search Supplement, September, 1958, pp. 411s-417s.
18 R. C. Sampson, "Photoelastic Analysis of Stresses in Per-
forated Material Subject to Teusion01' Beuding," Bettis Technical
Review, WAPD-BT-18. April, 1960; available from Office of Tech-
nical Services, Department of Commerce. \Vashington 25, D.C.
19 R. E. Peterson, "Stress-Concentration Design Factors,"John Wiley
& Sons, New York, N.Y, 1953.
Stress intensity
Peak in ligaments
Load Combined pressure
Cyclic pressure and thermal
R e fe re n c e s 1 G. Horvay, "The Plane-Stress Problem of
Perforated Plates,"
JO 'll1 "1 ta lo f App lied 111echan ies,vol. 19, TRANS.AS ME, vol.
74, 1952,
pp. 355-360. 2 G. Horvay, "Bending of Honeycombs and Perforated
Plates,"
Journa l o f A1Jp lied 111eehan ics," 'o l. 19, TRANS.ASME, vol.
74, 1952, pp. 122-123.
7 See reference [14], figs. 7-11, and reference [15], figs. 18,
19,20,24,
and 25
recommended herein are based on those obtained experimentally
by Sampson. Stresses and ddlec:tiolls caleulated using these
values showed better agreement with the test results obtained
by Leven (on uniformly loaded, simply supported, circulnr
per-
forated pl:Ltes) thalJ any of the other appro:Lehl~s
mentioned
herein! For most conventional steam generators, the design
basis
recommended herein allows a slightly thinner tIl be sheet than
does
TEMA [11]. For example, in a typiclll high-pressure design
where TE:MA requires It minimum tube-sheet thid:ness of 10
in.,
the design methods descrihed herein require a minimum
thickness
of 91/, in. if S " , is taken as5/s of the yield strength of the
material
and full credit is taken for the tubes. On the other hand,
where
severe thermal loads are antieipated, it may be necessary
tomake
design modifications in order to meet the criteria
recommended
herein, whereas TEMA does not account for thermal loads.
A ckn o w le d g m en ts The design methods proposed on this paper
are the culmination
of a program sponsored by the Bureau of Ships and
co-ordinated
by the vVestinghouse Bettis Atomic 1'o"'er Laboratory. The
stress limits proposed, however, represent only the opinions of
the
authors. The experimental work used as a basis for the pro-
posed design methods was performed by Messrs.IVr. .M. Leven
and R. C. Sampson at the \Vestinghouse Research Laboratories
and by Mr. A. Lohmeier at the vVestinghouse Steam Division.
To avoid duplication of effort, the program was co-ordinated
by
the authors with a somewhat broader program on stresses in
ligaments being sponsored by the Pressure Vessel Research
Committee of the vVelding Research Couneil.