Voutsaki et al In press Diet, economy, society in Middle Helladic Lerna

MIDDLE HELLADIC LERNA: DIET, ECONOMY,

SOCIETY

Sofia Voutsaki, Sevi Triantaphyllou, Eleni Milka, Carol Zerner

Abstract

In this paper we will combine different sets of data and different methods in order to

understand the relation between subsistence, economy and society in Middle Helladic

Lerna (2100 – 1700 BC). The following methods will be used:

Analysis of the human remains (including the examination of health and oral

status, as well as dental microwear and stable isotopes analysis) in order to

examine dietary variation

A contextual analysis of the mortuary data in order to examine differentiation

among age, gender,and kin groups, but also change through time.

An analysis of differentiation between households, by exploring the

distribution of economic and social activities across the settlement and

through time.

The aim of this integrated analysis is to detect differentiation within the community,

and to correlate differentiation in different spheres (diet, housing, treatment at death).

However, an attempt will be made to go one step further, and to understand the

nature of this differentiation, i.e. the nature of social relations in the MH period. The

main questions to be addressed are: What was the relation between diet and social

differentiation in MH Lerna? What was the role of food and agricultural resources in

social exchanges in the MH period?

Keywords

Diet, social differentiation, domestic economy, Lerna, Middle Bronze Age.

1

1

Introduction

The main question we want to address in this paper is the relation between diet and

social differentiation. In recent years, various analytical methods have been

introduced in order to establish variation in health and diet between people in the past:

analysis of human remains in terms of pathologies and dental health, stable isotopes

analysis, dental microwear analysis and others. The results of these analyses,

however, are hardly ever1 correlated with other aspects of the evidence, e.g. the

mortuary treatment or offerings accompanying the deceased in his / her grave. What is

more, analyses of dietary variation are based on the assumption that the consumption

of certain foodstuffs, e.g. animal protein, imply higher social status, and conversely

that higher status arises from differential economic potential. In Aegean archaeology

in particular, these assumptions are almost engrained in social interpretations, because

of the heavy influence by economically deterministic models such as Renfrew’s

systemic model2 and Halstead’s ‘social storage’ model.3 The proposition that social

status arises from differential productive potential by means of surplus accumulation

has been criticized on theoretical grounds,4 but nevertheless remains highly

influential.

In this paper, we would like to examine the relationship between social differentiation

and diet in one specific community, Lerna, during a period of drastic social change,

the MH period (Table 1). Our aim is to reconstruct the social organisation of MH

Lerna, as well as processes of change through the MH period and the transition to the

LH period. This will be achieved by employing different analytical methods, and by

integrating different types of data (funerary,5 skeletal,6 as well as the evidence from

1 Exceptions can be found in Schepartz et al. 2009.

2 Renfrew 1972.

3 Cf. Halstead 1981.

4 See several papers in Barrett and Halstead 2004; see also Christakis 2008, 122 for a

different argument.

5 The analysis of the mortuary data is carried out by E. Milka.

6 The re-examination of the human remains from MH Lerna has been carried out by S.

Triantaphyllou.

2

2

houses and domestic assemblages7) in order to explore differentiation in different

spheres of life and in death.8

Phase Absolute dates9

MH I 2100 – 1900 BC

MH II 1900 – 1800 BC

MH III 1800 – 1700 BC

LH I 1700 – 1600 BC

Table 1. Chronological diagramme.

The evidence will be examined in two chronological phases, which are fairly distinct

in terms of social and historical developments. During the early phases of the MH

period the southern mainland slowly recovers from a major crisis which swept the

entire region at the end of the Early Bronze Age. The MH I – MH II phases are still

characterized by depopulation, a certain social regression, cultural introvertedness,

relative poverty and material austerity. In contrast, the later phases (MH III – LH I)

witness population growth, increasing prosperity, receptivity to external stimuli,

effervescent material production as well as intensification of social change. This

division is of course schematic; in fact, as we will see below, the first indications of

change can be found sporadically already during the MH II period.

Concentrating on Lerna presents both advantages and advantages. Lerna may be

considered the type site of the MH period, since Caskey’s excavations10 helped

7 This analysis is carrried out by S. Voutsaki and C. Zerner.

8 The analysis has been carried out as part of a 5-year multidisciplinary project, the

Middle Helladic Argolid Project, financed by the Netherlands Organization for

Scientific Research (NWO) and the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. For the

aims and methods of the project, see Voutsaki 2005; Voutsaki forthcoming, or visit the

website of the project: http://www.MHArgolid.nl.

9 The absolute dates, though approximate, are based on radiocarbon analyses carried

out as part of the Middle Helladic Argolid Project. On Lerna: Voutsaki et al. 2009a;

Voutsaki et al. forthcoming. On Asine: Voutsaki et al. 2010. On Aspis, Argos:

Voutsaki et al. 2008.

10 Caskey 1954; 1955; 1956; 1957; 1958.

3

3

elucidating the chronological sequence in the southern mainland, but the MH layers

are still largely unpublished.11 While plant remains and animal bones were collected,12

the methods of recovery together with the state of preservation and documentation do

not allow us to form an adequate picture of subsistence patterns during the period.13 In

terms of its skeletal assemblage, however, MH Lerna with a sample of 209 skeletons

is one of the best documented sites of the prehistoric Aegean. While Angel’s

pioneering research14 on anthropometrics and craniometrics had as main aim to

establish the provenance of the inhabitants of MH Lerna15, the recent re-examination

of the human remains offers plenty of scope for an exploration of their health status

and diet.16 In particular, the correlation of the macroscopic investigation of oral

pathologies with new analytical methods, such as stable isotope and dental microwear

analysis, has shed light on different aspects of diet. In addition, the analysis of

variation between sex and/or age groups in the different phases of the MH period has

given us invaluable insights to gender roles, age divisions, and the position of

subadults in MH Lerna. Furthermore, the graves belonging to the MH occupation of

the site are very well documented,17 and therefore the correlation of skeletal and

mortuary data allow us to observe differentiation from different angles. Finally, MH

Lerna offers another important advantage: groups of graves can be examined in

connection with the house in the ruins of which they are cut.18 To conclude, MH

11 Banks 1967; Blackburn 1970; Zerner 1978.

12 Hopf 1962; Gejvall 1969.

13 For the Mycenaean period, see now Reese 2008.

14 Angel 1971. 15 Triantaphyllou, in press.

16 For preliminary reports of the re-examination of Lerna’s human remains, see

Triantaphyllou in Voutsaki et al. 2004, 33-36; 2005, 95-102; 2006, 63-64 and

Triantaphyllou, forthcoming. For the results of the stable isotope analysis see

Triantaphyllou et al. 2007.

17 Blackburn 1970; Milka in Voutsaki et al. 2005, 36-37; 2006, 106-107; 2007, 64-68.

18 It is generally thought that graves in MH times were placed under the floor of

houses still in use (Cavanagh & Mee 1998, 24), or among the ruins of abandoned

houses (Hägg & Hägg 1973, passim; Nordquist 1987, 91; Dietz 1991, 275, 285;

Maran 1995, passim). Milka’s analysis of grave contexts in MH Lerna has revealed

that graves in Lerna are as a rule cut among house debris already since MH II (Milka

4

4

Lerna, despite its problems and limitations, still provides an ideal opportunity to

explore the relation between diet and social differentiation and the role of agricultural

surplus in processes of change.

1. The early phases: MH I – MH II period19

1.1. Age and gender

Our discussion will start with the mortuary and skeletal evidence, and in particular

with the two main dimensions which structure social life: age and gender.

All age groups are represented among the MH I – II graves (Figure 1). This suggests

that in this period, being buried among houses represents the norm and is not reserved

for specific age groups, e.g. children or infants.20 However, some differentiation can

be observed: Only neonates are buried in houses still in use, while adults and sub-

adults are interred into destroyed and ruined houses.21 In addition, burial jars were

only used for sub-adults, primarily neonates, while cists were mainly used for adult

burials.22 Finally, the few offerings23 found are more often associated with juvenile

and adult burials.24 The macroscopic investigation of oral pathology and in particular

the overall distribution of calculus versus caries rates between adults and sub-adults

(Figure 2) suggests that the sub-adult segment of the population consistently

in Voutsaki et al. 2006, 107-108; Milka in press).

19 We should clarify that our analysis is based on the revised dating of most (but not

all) graves by Carol Zerner. If the date of a grave has not been revised, we use the

date given by Blackburn 1970. The information on houses is based on the preliminary

reports and on information provided once more by Carol Zerner.

20 On this point see also the detailed study by Ingvarsson-Sundström 2008;

Ingvarsson-Sundström & Nordquist 2005, 156-174; Pomadère in press.

21 Milka in Voutsaki et al. 2006, 107; Milka in press.

22 As noticed already by Blackburn 1970, 285; Nordquist 1979, 20; Voutsaki 2004,

353; Milka in Voutsaki et al. 2007, 65.

23 E.g. C-F, MH II, 16 Ler, juvenile female: two vessels, terracotta whorl, obsidian

flake; BA 1, MH II, 33 Ler, young adult male: vessel, bronze chisel, animal bones.

24 Milka, forthcoming.

5

5

consumed soft and processed foodstuffs which predispose the development of

cariotic lesions in the teeth.25

If we look at the proportional representation of gender categories (Figure 3), slightly

more men then women are buried in MH I – II Lerna. Differentiation throughout the

period is expressed in body position: as a rule, men were buried on the right side and

women on the left, though exceptions exist.26 The contextual analysis has revealed

some subtle differentiation in burial offerings. For example, tools were primarily

found in 30-50 years old male burials, while ornaments in juvenile female burials.27

However, it should be stressed that we are dealing with only a few cases.

If we now turn to health status, the osteological analysis focused on two broad

pathological categories: a. levels of mechanical load, i.e. osteoarthritis, vertebral

arthritis, trauma, musculo-skeletal markers, resulting from heavy manual work, and b.

stress factors, i.e. non-specific infections, anaemia, enamel hypoplasia, resulting from

nutritional problems during the developmental years and exposure to pathogenic

agents during lifetime. The distribution of these conditions is not even between the

two sexes (Figure 4). Both sexes demonstrate skeletal changes related to the musculo-

skeletal system throughout the MH period though no clear, or consistent patterns can

be discerned. However, stress factors (metabolic disturbances and enamel hypoplasia

defects) appear to have affected women more frequently than men, especially during

the MH I–II phases. Women in MH I-II show a slightly higher incidence of lesions

related to physical workload, while the opposite can be observed in the MH III-LH I

periods. Finally, men show consistently slightly higher incidence of non-specific

infections, which may suggest more frequent exposure to pathogenic agents, possibly

due to external contacts. Therefore, it can be argued that a sexual division of labour,

but also subtle differences between sexes existed already in MH I – II.

The evidence for differences in diet between men and women is not fully conclusive

for this period. It is important to point out here that the different methods employed

reveal different aspects of diet: The macroscopic investigation of dental lesions

informs us about the chemistry of the oral environment, stable isotope analysis about

the relative proportion of the type of protein intake and dental microwear analysis

25 E.g. a kind of gruel, as proposed recently by Sundström-Ingvarsson for the Asine

children.

26 As noticed already by Nordquist 1979, 17; see also Ruppenstein, in press.

27 Milka in Voutsaki et al. 2007, 65-66.

6

6

about the texture of the food consumed. The distribution of dental lesions shows

slightly higher rates of calculus and low rates of caries, which suggests consumption

of animal protein by both sexes (Figure 5). The stable isotope analysis (Figure 6)

indicates that men and women consumed a similar proportion of animal and plant

based proteins though diet among men is perhaps slightly more varied.28 However,

dental microwear analysis shows that women consumed softer and more processed

foodstuffs (though it should be stressed that only the MH II sample was adequate for

statistical analysis).

To conclude: in general terms, men and women shared the same diet during MH I - II,

but some slight differences exist with regard to the texture of the foodstuffs and the

type of the protein intake.

1.2. Differentiation in mortuary treatment

Having examined age and gender, we will now turn to differentiation in mortuary

treatment. The discussion will proceed in two stages: we will first discuss

differentiation between individual burials, and then between groups of graves.

1.2.1. Differentiation between individuals

Differences in grave size or construction are minimal in MH I – II, and there are very

few graves with a more diverse set of offerings. There is no correlation between grave

type, grave construction and quantity or diversity of offerings, i.e. burials in cists are

not necessarily accompanied by more, or more diverse offerings. Only one (MH II)

grave stands out in this period: J 4B, a prime adult (30-40 years) male skeleton29

buried in extended position (which is unusual for this period) in a cist accompanied by

four vessels, one of which imported from Crete, and a bronze razor blade or knife.

Although the skeleton is very poorly preserved,30 the high degree of musculo-skeletal

markers suggest that this man engaged in heavy physical work.

We can reverse the argument and look at the few skeletons (five MH I / II out of a

total of 209 skeletons) that show no evidence for mechanical load and may have

28 Two men (D 1, 20 Ler: MH II, pit, no offerings; D18, 48 Ler: MH II, pit, no

offerings) seem to have consumed more plant protein.

29 217 Ler.

30 As far as it can be established because of the poor preservation, this skeleton does

not seem to be exceptional in terms of health or oral status.

7

7

engaged less with heavy manual work (Table 2). Unfortunately, only three of these

skeletons, all female, were sufficiently preserved, and their dating is not always

secure.31 Nevertheless, none of these burials is exceptional in terms of grave

construction or offerings, nor do they cluster in a specific area.

Period Adults

MH I – MH II

Male Female Uncertain

2 2 1

5

MH III – LH I 0

‘MH’ 3

TOTAL 8?

Table 2. Skeletons showing no evidence for mechanical load

We can also examine skeletons showing no signs of dietary or environmental stress

(Table 3). Eight out of 29 MH I – II skeletons (out of a total of 209) show no

indications of stress. Once more, low levels of stress do not correlate with burial

treatment, grave type or grave offerings.

Table 3. Skeletons showing no signs of dietary or environmental stress

To sum up: In MH I – II differentiation between individual burials in terms of

mortuary treatment is minimal, and does not correlate with diet, pathologies and stress

levels.

31 These three skeletons belonged to four females: BC 5, 77 Ler MH I, date not

revised; M 1, 59 Ler: ‘MH’; J 2, 211 Ler: ‘MH’.

Period Sub-adults Adults

MH I – MH II

7 (2 neonate-

birth)

1

Male Female

1 0

8

MH III – LH I 21

TOTAL 29

8

8

1.2.2. Differentiation per group

Examining differentiation between individual burials is not sufficient, as the

contextual analysis of the mortuary data has revealed differentiation between grave

groups.32 Before we present these observations, we first need to explain how groups

have been defined. Some of the graves in Lerna were located close together clustering

in, or around free-standing houses. Only the dense groups in which graves were

placed in the same location over a period of time and were related to particular

houses, have been assigned to groups (Figure 7).33 In other words, burial groups have

been defined by spatial proximity, by connection with a house and by persistence

through time.

The analysis has revealed that while differentiation between individual burials is

minimal, there is some differentiation between grave groups. Early cists cluster in

group B (Figure 8), while burial jars, used for sub-adult burials, cluster in the

adjacent groups B and A (Figure 9). Groups B and A also have the highest density of

vases and of imported pottery among the offerings, but also the highest proportion of

non-ceramic offerings found in the graves (Figures 10 and 11).34 Finally, partly

removed, or disarticulated burials as well as double, or multiple burials concentrate in

the same area (Figure 12).

To conclude: Groups B and A stand out in most aspects, though it should be kept in

minds that differentiation is never really pronounced. It is interesting that both areas

occupy the most prominent part of the settlement excavated so far, near to the House

of Tiles tumulus.35

It is worth looking more closely at the sequence in grave group B,36 which, as we have

seen, stands out both in terms of the quantity of offerings and the complexity of the

mortuary treatment. During the transitional EH III/MH I period two apsidal houses,

House 68A and House 99E, were built next to each other. No graves were associated

32 Milka in Voutsaki et al. 2007, 67.33 Assigning graves to groups was only possible in the eastern half of the excavated

area for which Carol Zerner provided us detailed plans showing the relation between

houses and graves in each phase. Seven groups have been defined in this way.

34 However, no items which could be considered valuable’, i.e. made of semi-precious

stone, bronze, or silver, have been found in those graves.

35 The LH I shaft graves will also be opened in the same area.

36 Milka, in press.

9

9

with them. The two houses were replaced in MH I by the complex consisting of

apsidal House 98A, rooms 44 and 45 and a courtyard. Only one grave37 may have

been opened in the courtyard while the house complex was still in use.

After the destruction of the house complex by fire during the MH II period, its debris

was heaped up and a number of graves38 were opened upon the debris (Figure 13).

Interestingly, graves cluster upon previous storage / cooking areas and generally

follow the orientation of pre-existed walls. The area was used exclusively for burials

from the middle part of the MH II period until the transition to the MH III period.

In the transition from the MH II to the MH III period, House 100 was erected on top

of the earlier graves. No tombs contemporary with the house were found, but tombs

dating to the late MH III period39 were opened upon the ruins after the house was

destroyed (Figure 14). Graves follow again the orientation of the walls, but the use of

the rooms upon which they were opened is unclear.

The last building activity in this area is represented by rooms 3 and 5 built during the

transitional MH III/LH I period west of the earlier graves. Although a couple of

graves (which cannot be dated accurately) may have been contemporary with these

two rooms, most of the associated tombs40 postdate the rooms, i.e. belong to the LH I

period (Figure 15). Once more, graves usually follow the orientation of walls. Here,

as with House 100, the specific use of the rooms is unknown. During the LH I-LH IIA

period shaft grave 2 was opened in the same area cutting down the debris of the MH I

House 98A, but also the ne corner of the House of the Tiles.

Many interesting observations can be made on this sequence: First of all, we see a

certain continuity in the positioning of the houses throughout the period. While their

precise location of the houses shifts slightly, their orientation remains unchanged

throughout the period. This may imply a certain fixity of the domestic group which

seems to occupy the same plot of land through time.41 Second, we see from MH II

37 BE 28: pit, neonate.

38 BE 22, BE 23, BE 24, BE 25, BE 26, BE 27, BE 29, BE 31.

39 BE 5, BE 9, BE 10, BE 11, BE 12, BE 15?, BE 17, BE 19?, BE 20.

40 BE 2, BE 3, BE 4, BE 6, BE 7, BE 8, BE 13, BE 14, BE 16.

41 Georgousopoulou (2004, 207-213) has observed a similar phenomenon in

neighbouring Asine, which she explains as expressing claims on land. Interestingly,

our comparative analysis of the Lerna and Asine data reveal that this phenomenon is

much more pronounced in Lerna.

10

10

onwards a cyclical alternation between houses and graves cut into the debris of the

destroyed and or abandoned houses.42 The fact that those graves follow more or less

the orientation of the house, and that they sometimes cluster in cooking or storage

areas implies that the memory of the house lay-out and the function of its parts

lingered for decades after its destruction and abandonment. These practices stress

even more the persistence of the kin group through time and its fixity in space. We

can suggest that they thereby express a concern with descent and with transmission of

property across the generations.43 This may explain why group B is characterized by a

higher concentration of secondary treatment and double or multiple burials. Finally, it

may not be a coincidence that shaft grave 2 was opened in this area.44

It is time to examine more closely the evidence from houses, especially in group B 45

where some interesting developments can be observed. The two EH/MH - MH I

apsidal houses 68A and 99E are typical examples for this early period: one- or two-

roomed, with evidence for cooking and storage inside the houses, and for basic

manufacturing activities both inside the houses and in the narrow lane between them.

Both houses were rebuilt at least once before they were replaced in late MH I by the

complex of House 98 A and rooms 44 and 45.46 This complex differs from earlier (and

contemporary) free-standing houses: It occupies a larger plot, and is demarcated with

an enclosure. It consists of an ordinary, rather small apsidal house with its own

storage facilities, a courtyard with a hearth and two auxiliary rooms used mainly for

storage (Figure 16). The complex as a whole has impressive storage capacity, and,

most importantly, it contained a large number of imported Minoan jars.47 It has

therefore already been interpreted as ‘the chief’s house’ in an attempt to detect

42 Successive episodes of house construction, house destruction and abandonment and

grave construction have also been observed in areas DE and D in Lerna. The other

areas have not as yet been revised by C. Zerner.

43 Voutsaki, forthcoming b.

44 Shaft grave 1 was, of course, cut into the tumulus erected over the House of Tiles.

45 Located in area BE in the excavation. 46 Caskey 1956, 159. For a more detailed analysis, see Voutsaki forthcoming b.

47 According to C. Zerner, this period represents the peak of Minoan imports in Lerna.

It is unfortunately impossible to study the distribution of Minoan imports across the

settlement, as the ceramic material has not been kept in its entirety.

11

11

aggrandizing faction leaders already in the earlier MH phases.48 However, the

analysis of the house remains from Lerna by Carol Zerner has revealed that House

Complex 98A is not unique; at least two other complexes existed,49 though both are

partly preserved and inadequately documented.

In terms of small finds, the usual assemblage of tools and small finds50 implying basic

manufacturing activities was recovered from the house - though nothing that could be

termed valuable. It should be stressed that the complex was destroyed in a violent fire

and had been covered by accumulated debris which sealed its contents. Elsewhere in

MH II Lerna metal tools, simple ornaments, or bronze pins have been found.51 No

valuable or exceptional finds were found in the graves that were opened into its ruins

in late MH II (Table 4).52

Grave Offerings

BE 24 Terracotta whorl

BE 25 One vessel

BE 29 One vessel

BE 30 (5 skeletons) Four vessels (two of which imported), two pestles, bone awl,

bone pin, terracotta whorl, terracotta pierced disc

BE 31 Bone pin, chert saw

Table 4. Graves with offerings cut into the ruins of house complex 98A

House 100, erected in this area at the transition to MH III, is unfortunately only partly

preserved, and no intact domestic assemblage has been found in it.53

Therefore, House Complex 98A provides evidence for the accumulation of surplus,

which must have helped establishing external contacts and bringing in imports into

this household. However, agricultural surplus in this case does not seem to lay the

48 Wright 2001; Wright 2004, 70ff.49 These are apsidal house BI with room BS in area D, and apsidal house 55 with

rooms AR, AM in area DE.

50 I.e. stone tools, obsidian and chert tools, bone pins, bone tools, clay whorls, etc.

51 Banks 1967, passim.

52 BE 22, BE 23, BE 24, BE 25, BE 26, BE 27, BE 29, BE 30, BE 31.

53 Carol Zerner, personal communication.

12

12

basis for the manufacture of valuables, the employment of craft specialists, or the

consumption of valuables. To put it simply, surplus does not seem to be translated to a

wealth differential in MH II Lerna. The absence of differentiation among MH I – II

graves corroborates this conclusion (with the notable exception of J 4B, as we have

seen above).

We can extend the argument further by returning once more to the skeletal evidence:

If we look at the distribution of individuals who do not preserve skeletal signs of

nutritional or environmental stress, group B burials do not stand out. Apparently, the

surplus accumulated in this household was not translated to a more varied or richer

diet

1.3. Preliminary conclusions on MH I – II

Let us attempt some conclusions on social structure during the MH I – II period:

During the early phases of the MH period, differences between the members of the

community are not pronounced. The basic structuring principles of social relations

seem to have been age, gender and kinship relations. Infants and children are included

among the graves and receive similar treatment, but some subtle differences imply

that age divisions did matter. The evidence for gender differentiation is minimal,

though a sexual division of labour may have existed already in these early phases.

The importance of kinship and descent was manifested by the clustering of graves, the

shared features within burial groups and their persistence through time. The

alternation between houses and graves in the same location express also a concern

with descent and with the transmission of property across generations. Individual

status is not emphasized in the mortuary sphere, and there is no correlation between

treatment at death and diet or health during life. Interestingly, there are subtle

differences between grave groups in treatment and offerings, but not in terms of

health status or diet. In addition, there is differentiation between households in terms

of storage capacity, surplus and presence of imports. However, this differentiation

does not seem to be translated into a wealth differential by means of the employment

of craft specialists, the production or consumption of valuables, or the consumption of

more meat and/or dairy products.

13

13

2. MH III - LH I

It is well-known that the mainland societies undergo a gradual though profound

transformation during the transition to the LH period: Conspicuous consumption in

the mortuary sphere signals the emergence of social differentiation, but also increased

emphasis on descent and more pronounced age and gender divisions. These internal

changes cannot of course be understood independently of the mainland’s closer

integration to the Aegean world. Let us examine how these wider changes affect

social relations within the Lerna community.

2.1. Age and gender

We start once more with age divisions in the mortuary sphere. In the later period, a

much stricter differentiation between age groups can be observed: Among the burials

in the settlement area (Figure 1) there is a prevalence of sub-adult individuals,

especially in LH I. In contrast, adults predominate in the extramural cemetery in

Myloi,54 which comes into use in MH III/LH I.55 Within Lerna itself, grave group G

(Figure 7), now becomes reserved for sub-adult burials.56 Specific forms and

practices are used exclusively by certain age categories:57 for instance, only adults are

buried in brick cists, or are placed in extended position.58 The very limited evidence

we have from the shaft graves59 may also imply that shaft graves were used

(primarily?) for adults.60 In general, age differentiation in mortuary treatment becomes

more pronounced in this period than it was in MH I – MH II.

54 Dietz & Divari-Valakou 1990, 45-62; Dietz 1991, 147-148.

55 The introduction of formal cemeteries is a phenomenon attested across the entire

southern mainland in this period.

56 Milka, forthcoming.

57 Milka in Voutsaki et. al. 2007, 65.

58 The only exception might have been the burial in grave DC 2, where a two years old

infant (148 Ler) was perhaps buried extended on its back and was accompanied by

rich offerings (Blackburn 1970, 174).

59 Only few foot bones of an adult we re recovered from shaft grave 2.

60 As indeed was the case in Grave Circle B of Mycenae where male adult burials

predominate; Angel 1972, Triantaphyllou in Voutsaki et al. 2006, 90-91,

Triantaphyllou, forthcoming. For a discussion on gender differentiation in Mycenae,

see Voutsaki 2004; Voutsaki, in press.

14

14

Distribution of dental lesions between adults and sub-adults (Figure 2) is consistent

with the consumption of cariogenic foodstuff by the sub-adult inhabitants of Lerna as

observed already for MH I- II.

If we examine gender, strangely enough more men than women seem to be buried in

Lerna in MH III times61 (Table 5, Figure 3). This pattern is difficult to explain,

especially as we have no comparative information on the Myloi burials.

MH III 13 male 10 female

MH III/LH I 6 male 1 female

LH I 2 male 3 female

MH III/LH I-LH I 16 male 6 female

Table 5. Proportion of male and fermale burials in MH III – LH I

Men and women are still buried on different sides, but differentiation in the burial

offerings becomes now clearer, as weapons62 are only found in male graves, while

neither ornaments nor pins are found in single male burials.63

Differences in the health status of men and women, and thereby indications for a

sexual division of labour continue (Figure 4). Men show slightly higher levels of

musculoskeletal markers and non-specific infectious lesions than women. This

suggests that they engaged in heavier physical work and were more exposed to

pathogenic agents, probably via outside contacts. It should be noted here that levels of

stress factors and infections decline in this period across the entire Lerna population

(Figure 7). This could be attributed either to local factors, i.e. perhaps to a

demographic decline in Lerna and thereby to a less congregated community, or to a

general rise in the standards of living during the more prosperous MH III – LH I

period.

The stable isotope analysis points to a slight difference between men and women

(Figure 6), with men having a more varied diet than women and a slightly higher

consumption of animal protein. Three men in specific have higher animal protein

levels, but as we see in Table 6, they are not distinguished in any other way.

61 The LH I sample is too small to allow statistical observations.

62 Such as arrowheads or sling pellets; no metal weapons have been in Lerna graves.

63 Voutsaki 2004, 356; Milka in Voutsaki et al. 2007, 65.

15

15

1 Ler A 1 YA (28.7) MH III cist bone awl, obsidian

blade

82 Ler BD 3 MA (40-50) LH I, or later pit no offerings

115 Ler BE 11 MA (40-50) MH III brick cist no offerings

Table 6. Late male burials with higher animal protein levels

To conclude, differentiation along age divisions becomes more pronounced in this

period, while gender differentiation in treatment at death and in diet becomes only

marginally more emphasized.

2.2. Differentiation, ‘status’or ‘wealth’

The appearance of the two shaft graves implies the emergence of status differences as

a new principle ordering social life.64 Unfortunately, the shaft graves were robbed and

human remains have been purposefully removed, perhaps at a later stage (?).65 A few

other single burials in Lerna and two in neighbouring Myloi (Table 7) receive some

more offerings, though neither the quantity nor the quality of offerings in MH III –

LH I Lerna is impressive.

LERNAGr No Date Grave

typeSkelno

Age/gender Treat-ment

Offerings

D 5 MH III / LH I

Cist 24 Ler Child (5.5y) Disturbed 3 vases

DC 2 LH I Cist 148 Ler Infant (2y) Primary 6 vases, faience bead

DE 21 LH I Cist 167 Ler Infant (2.5-3y)

- Two vases, silver band, many bronze, paste and stone beads. terracotta pierced disc

BC 3 LH I Very large cist

Few bones, not studied

Adult? Secondary - skeleton removed from the grave

Four vases, bronze bodkin, bronze pin

64 Voutsaki 1997; Voutsaki 2010b, 603-604.

65 Blackburn 1970, 168-173. See also Lindblom 2007 for a recent discussion on the

nature of the assemblage found inside the shaft graves.

16

16

MYLOIGr No Date Grave

typeAge/gender Treatment Offerings

V MH III / LH I

Cist ? Primary Four vases, terracotta whorl

VII LH I Cist Adult Primary. Second burial in the grave

Four vases, bronze knife, bronze razor

Table 7. MH III – LH I graves with more offerings in Lerna and Myloi

The relative poverty of Lerna becomes even more striking, if compared with

neighbouring Argos,66 Asine,67 and of course Mycenae.68 Although the picture is

distorted because of the robbed shaft graves, in other sites (in the Argolid at least)

there is a general increase in the wealth deposited with the dead, even below the level

of the elites.69

Having said that, there are now more consistent correlations between different facets

of mortuary treatment; e.g. extended skeletons are usually found in larger cists, and

contain more offerings. The notion of personal status differences is now emerging.

However, mortuary treatment still does not correlate with health status. For instance,

the number of skeletons missing stress lesions increases in this period, but none of the

burials interred in larger graves or accompanied by richer offerings belong to this

category (Table 8).

66 Protonotariou-Deilaki 1980; Voutsaki et al. 2009b; Sarri & Voutsaki in press.

67 Dietz 1980; Milka 2006; Milka n.d.; Voutsaki et al. in press.

68 Schliemann 1878; Mylonas 1973; Alden 2000.

69 See Voutsaki 2009 for shifts in the political significance of sites in the Argolid

during the MH and LH period.

MH I – MH II Total 8

MH III – LH I

Sub-adults Adults

14 (7

neonate-

birth)

7

Male Female

5 2

Total 21

17

17

The question is, however, whether personal status is still embedded in (burial, or kin)

group status. We turn to this question below.

2.3. Differentiation between grave groups

Group B still stands out for the density of removed/ disarticulated skeletons, and

double or multiple burials (Figure 17). Although the distribution of burial offerings

(vases, imports and non-ceramic objects) is more even across the grave groups than

was the case in MH I – II, group B retains the highest density (Figure 17). However,

objects of higher value, i.e. silver, bronze, semi-precious stones, paste, do not cluster

in group B, but are now thinly spread across the settlement.

However, if we examine the distribution of skeletons missing stress lesions (total: 29)

Group B skeletons (6, but 3 are neonates) not exceptional (Figure 18).

We can therefore conclude that there is differentiation between grave groups in the

distribution of offerings or the complexity of treatment, but there is no correlation

between mortuary ‘wealth’, complexity of mortuary treatment and health status.

2.4. Preliminary conclusions on MH III – LH I

During the MH III-LH I period gender and especially age divisions become more

pronounced. While personal status is emerging as a new criterion of social

categorization, it is still embedded in kinship.70 Indeed in this period kin relations are

emphasized not only with the continuing association between houses and graves or

the shared features and practices within clusters, but also with the re-use of tombs and

the secondary treatment of the body.

Differences in mortuary treatment –whether at the level of the individual burial, or

that of the group- do not correlate with health status.

General conclusions

Let us return to the questions we raised in the Introduction.

i. What was the relation between diet and social differentiation?

70 For a fuller discussion, see Voutsaki 2010a.

18

18

The examination of MH data has disproved the tacit assumption underlying most

discussions of dietary variation in archaeology: differentiation (between individuals,

between households, between kin groups) does not seem to correlate with health

status and pathologies. It should be emphasized that this is not the case even in the

later period, when differentiation becomes more pronounced. However, here we need

to keep in mind the limitations of the Lerna case, as we have no evidence from the

shaft graves, nor any osteological information for the Myloi cemetery, which most

probably was one of the extramural cemeteries of Lerna.71

ii. What was the role of agricultural surplus in processes of change?

We have seen that in certain periods, notably in early MH II, we have evidence for

differentiation between households (so far only in Lerna) in terms of storage capacity,

agricultural surplus and the acquisition of imports – though not in terms of the

production or consumption of valuables. Therefore, agricultural surplus is not

translated into wealth differential in this case – and Halstead’s social storage

hypothesis is disproved by the MH data. And so is Renfrew’s gradualist model:

whatever processes of differentiation were at play in MH II, they were aborted soon

afterwards. Surplus did not lead to increased craft production, nor to social

differentiation.

We would like to finish with a methodological remark: in this paper we tried to

integrate different types of evidence and different analytical techniques. We tried to

go beyond juxtaposing them; we attempted to interweave them in order to resolve

specific archaeological questions.

71 It has been argued elsewhere that Lerna declines in importance in MH III – LH I

(Voutsaki 2009).

19

19

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research) for its

generous funding of the project; the University of Groningen for providing matching

funding and INSTAP for additional Research Grants. We would like to express our

thanks to the successive Ephors of the 4th Ephorate of Classical and Prehistoric

Antiquities, Mrs Zoi Aslamatzidou and Mrs Anna Banaka, the Department of

Conservation, Greek Ministry of Culture, the American School of Classical Studies,

and Dr M. Wiencke, Dr C. Zerner and Dr E. Banks for granting us permission to

study and sample the Lerna skeletons. We would also like to acknowledge the

assistance of the staff at the 4th Ephorate, particularly Dr Alkistis Papadimitriou and

Mrs Evangelia Pappi. The personnel in the Museum of Argos have been extremely

helpful throughout our stay in Argos; we thank them all.

20

20

References

Alden, M. 2000. The Prehistoric Cemetery: Pre-Mycenaean and Early Mycenaean

Graves. Well-Built Mycenae. The Helleno-British Excavations Within the

Citadel at Mycenae, 1959-1969, fasc. 7. Oxford.

Angel, J. L. 1971. Lerna: A Preclassical Site in the Argolid, Volume II. The People of

Lerna. Analysis of a Prehistoric Aegean Population. Princeton.

Banks, E. C. 1967. The Early and Middle Helladic Objects from Lerna. PhD thesis,

University of Cincinnati. Ann Arbor.

J.C. Barrett & P. Halstead (eds), The Emergence of Civilisation Revisited. Sheffield

Studies in Aegean Archaeology 6. Oxford.

Blackburn, E.T. 1970. Middle Helladic Graves and Burial Customs with Special

Reference to Lerna in Argolid. PhD dissertation, University of Cincinnati.

Ann Arbor.

Caskey, J. L.  1954. Excavations at Lerna, 1952-1953. Hesperia 23, 3-30.

Caskey, J. L.  1955. Excavations at Lerna, 1954. Hesperia 24, 25-49.

Caskey, J. L.  1956. Excavations at Lerna, 1955. Hesperia 25, 147-173.

Caskey, J. L.  1957. Excavations at Lerna, 1956. Hesperia 26, 142-162.

Caskey, J. L.  1958. Excavations at Lerna, 1957. Hesperia 27, 125-144.

Cavanagh, W. & C. Mee 1998. A Private Place: Death in Prehistoric Greec. Studies

in Mediterranean Archaeology CXXV. Jonsered..

Dietz, S. 1980. The Middle Helladic Cemetery, the Middle Helladic and Early

Mycenaean Deposits. Asine II. Results of the Excavations East of the

Acropolis 1970-1974, fasc. 2. ActaAth-4, 24:2. Stockholm.

Dietz, S. 1991. The Argolid at the Transition to the Mycenaean Age: Studies in the

Chronology and Cultural Development in the Shaft Grave Period.

Copenhagen.

Dietz, S. & N. Divari-Valakou 1990. A Middle Helladic III / Late Helladic I Grave

Group from Myloi in the Argolid (Oikopedon Manti). Opuscula Atheniensia

XVIII:4, 45-62.

Gejvall, N.-G. 1969. Lerna: a Preclassical Site in the Argolid, Volume I. The Fauna.

Princeton.

Georgousopoulou, Th. 2004. Simplicity vs Complexity: Social Relationships and the

MH I Community of Asine. In: J. C. Barrett & P. Halstead (eds), The

21

21

Emergence of Civilisation Revisited, 207-213. Sheffield Studies in Aegean

Archaeology 6, Oxford.

Hägg, I. & R. Hägg (eds) 1973. Excavations in the Barbouna Area at Asine. Boreas,

Uppsala Studies in Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern Civilization 4,

fasc. 1. Uppsala.

Halstead, P. 1981. From Determinism to Uncertainty: Social Storage and the Rise of

the Minoan Palaces. In A. Sheridan & G. Bailey (eds) Economic Archaeology:

Towards an Integrated Approach, 187-213. British Archaeological Reports,

International Series 96. Oxford.

Hopf, M. 1962. Nutzpflanzen vom Lernäischen Golf. JRGZM 9, 1-19.

Ingvarsson-Sundström, A. 2008. Children Lost and Found: A Bioarchaeological

Study of Middle Helladic Children in Asine with a Comparison to Lerna.

Asine III: Supplementary Studies on the Swedish Excavations 1922-1930,

fasc. 2. Stockholm.

Lindblom, M. 2007. Early Mycenaean Mortuary Meals at Lerna VI with Special

Emphasis on their Aeginetan Components. In F. Felten, W. Gauss & R.

Smetana (eds). Middle Helladic Pottery and Synchronisms, 115-135. Wien.

Maran, J. 1995. Structural Changes in the Pattern of Settlement during the Shaft

Grave Period on the Greek Mainland. In: R. Laffineur & W.-D. Niemeir

(eds), Politeia: Society and State in the Aegean Bronze Age, 67-72. Aegaeum

12. Liége.

Milka, E. 2006. From Cemeteries to Societies. The study of the Middle Helladic

(2000-1500 BC) Burials from the Argolid, Southern Greece. In: M. Kerkhof,

R. van Oosten, F. Tomas & C. van Woerdekom (eds) Symposium voor

Onderzoek door Jonge Archeologen (SOJA) Bundel 2005, 53-63. Leiden.

Milka, E. In press. Burials upon the Ruins of Abandoned Houses in the MH Aargolid.

In: G. Touchais, A. Philippa-Touchais, S. Voutsaki & J. Wright (eds),

MESOHELLADIKA: The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age, 433-

443. BCH Supplément 52, Athens.

Milka, E. Forthcoming. Diversity and Change in Mortuary Practices: a comparison of

Lerna, Asine, Argos.

Milka, E. n.d. Mortuary Practices in MH Asine. Unpublished manuscript.

Mylonas, G. 1973: O Tafikos Kyklos ton Mykinon. Athens.

22

22

Nordquist, G.C. 1979. Dead society. A Study of the intramural cemetery at Lerna.

Unpublished MA Dissertation, University of Southampton.

Nordquist, G.C. 1987. A Middle Helladic Village. Asine in the Argolid. Boreas,

Uppsala Studies in Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern Civilization, fasc.

16. Uppsala.

Nordquist, G.C. & A. Ingvarsson- Sundström 2005. Live Hard, Die Young: Mortuary

Remains of Middle and Early Late Helladic children from the Argolid in

social context. In: A. Dakouri-Hild & S. Sherratt (eds), AUTOCHTHON:

Papers Presented to O.T.P.K. Dickinson on the Occasion of his Retirement ,

156-174. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 1432. Oxford.

Pomadère, M. In press. De l'Indifférenciation à la Discrimination Spatiale des

Sépultures? Variété des Comportements à l'Égard des Enfants Morts Pendant

l'HM-HR I. In: G. Touchais, A. Philippa-Touchais, S. Voutsaki & J. Wright

(eds), MESOHELLADIKA: The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age,

433-443. BCH Supplément 52. Athens.

Protonotariou - Deilaki Ε. 1980.Oi Tymvoi tou Argous. Ph.D. dissertation, University

of Athens.

Reese, D. 2008. Faunal Remains from Late Helladic Lerna (Argolid, Greece).

Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 8:1, 5-25.

Renfrew, A.C. 1972. The Emergence of Civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in

the Third Millenium BC. London.

Ruppenstein, F. In press. Gender and Regional Differences in Middle Helladic Burial

Customs. In: G. Touchais, A. Philippa-Touchais, S. Voutsaki & J. Wright

(eds), MESOHELLADIKA: The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age,

433-443. BCH Supplément 52. Athens.

Sarri, K. & S. Voutsaki. In press. The Argos ‘Tumuli’. A Re-examination. In S.

Müller-Celka & E. Borgna (eds), Ancestral Landscapes: Burial Mounds in

the Copper and Bronze Ages. Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient, Lyon.

Schepartz, L.A., S. Miller-Antonio & J.M.A. Murphy. 2009. Differential Health

among the Mycenaeans of Messenia: Status, Sex, and Dental Health at Pylos.

In L.A. Schepartz, S. Fox & C. Bourbou (eds), New Directions in the Skeletal

Biology of Greece. Hesperia Supplement 43, 155-174. Princeton.

Schliemann, H. 1878. Mykenae: Bericht Über Meine Forschungen und Entdeckungen

in Mykenae und Tiryns. Leipzig.

23

23

Triantaphyllou, S. In press. Prospects for Reconstructing the Lives of Middle Helladic

Populations in the Argolid: Past and Present of Human Bone Studies. In: G.

Touchais, A. Philippa-Touchais, S. Voutsaki & J. Wright (eds),

MESOHELLADIKA: The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age, 553-

565. BCH Supplément 52. Athens.

Triantaphyllou, S. Forthcoming. Unfolding Life Histories in the Argive Plain in the

Middle Helladic Period: A Comparative Analysis of the Human Skeletal

remains from Lerna, Argos and Mycenae.

Triantaphyllou, S., M.P. Richards, C. Zerner & Voutsaki, S. 2008. Isotopic Dietary

Reconstruction of Humans from Μiddle Bronze Age Lerna, Argolid, Greece.

JAS 35, 3028-3034.

Voutsaki, S. 1997. The Creation of Value and Prestige in the Late Bronze Age

Aegean. Journal of European Archaeology X: 34-52.

Voutsaki, S. 2005. Social and Cultural Change in the Middle Helladic period:

Presentation of a New Project. In: A. Dakouri-Hild & S. Sherratt (eds),

AUTOCHTHON: Papers presented to Oliver Dickinson at the occasion of his

retirement, 134-143. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 1432.

Oxford.

Voutsaki, S. 2004. Age and Gender in the Southern Greek Mainland, 2000-1500 BC.

Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitung 45:2-3, 339-363.

Voutsaki, S. 2009. From the Kinship Economy to the Palatial Economy: The Argolid in

the 2nd Millennium BC. In Pullen, D. (ed.) Political Economies in the Aegean

Bronze Age, 86-111. Oxford.

Voutsaki, S., 2010a. Agency and Personhood at the Onset of the Mycenaean period.

Archaeological Dialogues 17:1, 65-92.

Voutsaki, S. 2010b.The Argolid. In E. Cline (ed.), Oxford Handbook for Aegean

Archaeology, 598-613. Oxford.

Voutsaki, S. In press. From Value to Meaning, from Things to Persons. In G. Urton & J.

Papadopoulos (eds), The construction of value in the ancient world. Monographs

of UCLA, Kotsen Institute, Los Angeles.

Voutsaki, S. Forthcoming a. Houses and Households in Middle Helladic Lerna. Hesperia.

Voutsaki, S. Forthcoming b. The Middle Helladic Argolid Project: Aims, Methods,

and Some First Answers. Hesperia.

24

24

Voutsaki, S., S. Triantaphyllou, S. Kouidou-Andreou, L. Kovatsi & E. Milka. 2004.

Lerna, 2000-1500 BC: A Pilot Analysis of Funerary, Skeletal and

Biomolecular Data. Pharos XI, 75-80.

Voutsaki, S., S. Triantaphyllou & E. Milka. 2005. Project on the Middle Helladic

Argolid: A Report on the 2004 Season. Pharos XII, 31-40.

Voutsaki, S., S. Triantaphyllou, A. Ingvarsson-Sundström, S. Kouidou-Andreou, L.

Kovatsi, A. Nijboer, D. Nikou & E. Milka. 2006. Project on the Middle

Helladic Argolid: A Report on the 2005 Season. Pharos XIII, 93-117.

Voutsaki, S., S. Triantaphyllou, A. Ingvarsson-Sundström & E. Milka. 2007. Project

on the Middle Helladic Argolid: A Report on the 2006 Season. Pharos XIV,

59-99.

Voutsaki, S., A.J. Nijboer, G. Touchais & A. Philippa-Touchais. 2008. Radiocarbon

analysis of Middle Helladic burials from Aspis, Argos. BCH 130:2 (2006),

613-625.

Voutsaki, S., K. Sarri, O. Dickinson, S. Triantaphyllou & E. Milka. 2009. The Argos

‘Tumuli’ Project: A report on the 2006 and 2007 Seasons. Pharos XV (2007),

153-192.

Voutsaki, S., A.J. Nijboer & C. Zerner. 2009. Middle Helladic Lerna: Relative and Absolute

Chronologies. In S.W. Manning & M.J. Bruce (eds) Tree-rings, Kings, and Old

World Archaeology and Environment: Papers Presented in Honour of Peter Ian

Kuniholm,151-161. Oxford.

Voutsaki, S., S. Dietz & A.J. Nijboer. 2010. Radiocarbon Analysis and the History of the

East Cemetery, Asine. Opuscula. Annual of the Swedish Institutes in Athens and

Rome, 31-52.

Voutsaki, S., A. Ingvarsson-Sundström & S. Dietz. In press. Tumuli and Social Status: a Re-

examination of the Asine Tumulus. In S. Müller-Celka & E. Borgna (eds), Ancestral

Landscapes: Burial Mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages. Travaux de la Maison de

l’Orient, Lyon.

Voutsaki, S., A.J. Nijboer & C. Zerner. Forthcoming. Radiocarbon Analysis From

Middle Helladic Lerna: a Final Report. Hesperia.

Wright, J. 2001. Factions and the Origins of Leadership and Identity in Mycenaean

society. Paper presented at Mycenaean Seminar, London.

25

25

Wright, J.C. 2004. The Emergence of Leadership and the Rise of Civilization in the

Aegean. In J.C. Barrett & P. Halstead (eds), The Emergence of Civilisation

Revisited, 64-89. Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology 6. Oxford.

Zerner, C.W. 1978. The Beginnings of the Middle Helladic Period at Lerna. PhD

Dissertation, University of Cincinnati. Ann Arbor.

26

26