Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office

08/2003 1

Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office

Helen Champion, Sarah WatkinDerrick Ryall

Responsibilities

Tools

Etna 2002

Future

08/2003 2

Met Office is the London VAAC

VAAC = Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre

08/2003 3

28 October 2002 1316 UTC

Satellite ash detection products AVHRR

– ch4 (10.8 m) - ch5 (12.0 m)

– available within 30 mins Covers three areas:

– Mediterranean area (Mt. Etna)

– London VAAC

– Iceland Frequency

– 3 hourly over Iceland

– 6 hourly over the Mediterranean

08/2003 4

AVHRR London VAAC (ch4 -ch5)

08/2003 5

Met Office NAME model Dispersion model

– Predicts the transport of airborne pollutants

– 1-1000’s km, hours - days

– Lagrangian particle model

Emergency response

– nuclear, volcano, fire, FMD

Air pollution

– episodes, forecasts, chemistry

Source attribution

– where, when, how much

– source/receptor relationships

– CTBTO

08/2003 6

Volcanic Ash Graphics

Three levels

– FL350-FL550

– FL200-FL350

– Surface-FL200

Source

– Unit release

– between summit height and plume top

– assumes particle size distribution

T+6,12,18,24

Extent of ‘visible’ ash cloud

08/2003 7

Additional Volcanic Ash graphics

Contoured plumes

Six levels

Easier comparisons with imagery / observations

08/2003 8

Recent Improvements to NAME

Automated plotting threshold for visual ash cloud concentrations

– Previously manual forecaster input based on obs

Upgraded to use ‘New Dynamics’ version of Unified Model

– 3 hourly global fields to T+144, ~60km resolution

– Increased vertical resolution (particularly near tropopause)

Revised boundary layer turbulence schemes

08/2003 9

Volcanic Ash - Trajectories

Also provide trajectories

Follow mean wind

Start at several levels

Quick indication of plume spread at various levels

08/2003 10

IcelandDaily runs

Improve response times and preparedness

Daily simulations using NAME

Release from Katla

– 6 hour release

– 0, 6, 12 & 18Z

– surface to FL400

Output on six levels

08/2003 11

Etna eruption 2002

27 Oct 2002 Etna erupted to ~FL200

Emissions continued over several days

Useful case to look at

– Full range of satellite imagery

– Area largely cloud free

Use NAME to simulate first 10 days of emissions

Continuous release from surface to FL200

Compare concentrations (FL100 & FL200) with satellite imagery, particularly ch4-ch5

08/2003 12

Etna 28/10/2002

08/2003 13

Etna 29/10/2002

08/2003 14

Etna 30/10/2002

08/2003 15

Etna 31/10/2002

08/2003 16

Etna 29/10/2002

Coloured by height(yellow=low level, red = high level)

08/2003 17

Effect of poorly resolved volcano

Inversion below summit

Plume remains in free troposphere

Peak not resolved

Inversion above ‘model’ summit

Plume also in boundary layer

Inversion

ActualModel

08/2003 18

Poorly resolved orography

Particular problem with isolated peaks

No simple solution as NWP data will not properly represent flow around/over peak

If use ‘model’ summit height column is ‘stretched’ - material spreads over twice the height, giving lower concentrations

Suggest using ‘elevated’ source

08/2003 19

Release surface to FL200 Release FL100 to FL200

Impact of poorly resolved orography

08/2003 20

Future Work Volcanic ash detection

– SEVERI on MSG (including AVHRR ch4-ch5)

– 15 minute imagery

Automatic detection system (Helen Watkin’s talk)– Upgrade to MSG

– Operational implementation

Modelling– Need better definition of ‘Visual Ash Cloud’ - more appropriate would be

’concentrations hazardous to aviation’

– Include sulphur as well as ash

– Ensemble approach - multiple NAME runs on ECMWF EPS members (51)

08/2003 21

Summary

Volcanic ash detection system and NAME predictions give increased confidence in operational VAAC results

Etna case study demonstrates the value of these tools

Issues for future work include

– calibration of satellite imagery

– representation of orography / height of release

– definition of hazardous ash concentrations