Cornet is the Big Brother of the Trumpet A chat between James Newcomb and Mark Ponzo
Cornet is the Big Brother of the TrumpetA chat between James Newcomb and Mark Ponzo
Hello! My name is James Newcomb. For a little over a year, I
hosted a podcast called Trumpet Dynamics. I had been a trumpet
player for most of my life, so it made sense to focus on something I
knew well when starting a podcast.
One day, I thought it would be fun to record an interview about the
cornet, which is closely associated with the trumpet. The first
person I thought to call was Mark Ponzo, professor of trumpet at
Northern Illinois University and Certified Cornet Aficionado.
Dr. Ponzo was agreeable to this, so we recorded an interview and
put it on the podcast. Little did I realize at the time that it would
begin a journey of mine to identify primarily as a cornet player and
begin the Cornet Revolution!
While the audio is unavailable for the time being, I’ve been able to
make a transcript of our chat.
I hope you enjoy it!
JN: The thing is, so many people today equate the cornet with the trumpet, as though they’re synonymous.
MP: Right, well back in the day it wasn’t. The cornet was king of
the brass instruments for almost 100 years. That changed in the
20’s, 30’s and 40’s with the onset of jazz and larger groups. But
military bands still use cornets, the Sousa Band here in Illinois
uses cornets, and we use them in the university as well.
The hotbed of cornet development was France. Some of the
French composers such as Berlioz and Bizet used it in their
orchestral works. They would use the cornet for the melody and
then use the trumpet to accentuate cadences, like a natural
trumpet would be used.
So this is a writing style that went on for about 100 years. The
cornets had the melodic material and the trumpets had fanfare
material. That’s how band composers wrote for those instruments,
all the way into the 30’s and 40’s.
I’ve enjoyed playing the cornet since I was in high school. My
teacher in high school played the cornet in college. So I learned a
lot of the cornet literature for contests and festivals. I enjoyed
learning about the pieces and that period of time, the late 1800’s
and early 1900’s. These were virtuoso solo works which were
largely written by the performers themselves to show off their own
skills.
JN: It’s interesting because today, or when I was in high school in the 1990’s, when you saw a cornet part, you just played it on trumpet.
MP: And I did the same thing in high school. I didn’t play cornet,
my teacher played cornet. In the 1960’s, when it said “cornet” you
were required to play it on cornet. So you were required to own
both a trumpet and a cornet. But by the time I was in high school,
that had changed. We just played the cornet parts on trumpet.
Some ensembles are more sensitive to this than others. For
example, if the part says “trombone,” you don’t play it on baritone
and vice versa. In our wind symphony at NIU, all my kids need to
have cornets to play in that ensemble. It really makes a huge
difference because the cornets blend so much better with
saxophones in a concert ensemble.
The Sousa Band was set up so that the cornets
and saxes would blend together. The saxes
used had a very dark timbre, and the cornets
worked really well with that.
Today the saxes tend to be a little brighter
sounding and they don’t blend as well. So now
they’re always competing with each other, whereas the original
intent was to blend and create a homogeneous, very colorful
sound.
JN: Tell us about the origination of the cornet.
MP: The biggest step was the development of valve systems. This
goes back to the early 1800’s. Depending on which source you go
to, it’s between 1814-1822. Patents were applied for for valves.
This technology came from steam engine development and was
eventually attached to small instruments like hunting horns.
Up to that point, from about 4,000 years ago to about the 1820’s,
the trumpet was considered a natural instrument, meaning no
valves.
The oldest existing instruments that we have are the two trumpets
from the tomb of King Tutankhamen. There were two trumpets -
bronze and silver - that were buried with him. They were
discovered when his tomb was uncovered in the 1950’s.
As the tubing became longer over time, more notes were possible.
The trumpet went from about a 2 foot instrument to about a 9 foot
instrument in around 1400. Around that time, people began to
discover how to bend tubing. Of course, an instrument that 8 feet
long would get easily damaged, and so learning how to bend the
tubing was very important in creating more pitches.
In 1400ish, instrument makers would put tar or pitch into the tube
and bend it, and then the tube didn’t collapse. So now we could
take a 9 foot trumpet and wrap it into what we might call a modern
bugle. A bigger version, but the same idea with the bends.
It stayed this way until valves came along. There were hand-
stopped trumpets. There was also the slide trumpet which was
used in England. The natural trumpet was being taught at the Paris
Conservatory until almost 1900, long after valves were invented.
So when valves came along, they were first attached like a post
horn, and that’s more of a conical instrument.
That was sort of the beginning of the cornet. They called them
“cornopeans” and used what was
called the Streitzel valve system, which
was one of the earliest successful
systems. The problem with the Streitzel system is that because of
the design, the valve had to be the same dimensions as the tubing
because the air actually came through the bottom of the valve. It
would shoot out into the slide at a 90 degree angle.
I own 9 cornopeans and they’re beautiful little instruments. They’re
very quiet but they’re very resistant because of all of these 90-
degree angles going through the horn. And the valves are really
small, about the size of your pinky finger.
Then the Perinet system came about 25 years after this, which is
basically what we use now. The air goes through the valve and
raises and lowers, as opposed to the air coming into the bottom of
the valve casing. Then they went from 2 valves to 3 valves in the
late 1830’s. After this, the 2-valve cornopeans became obsolete.
So from around 1835 to the present, the system hasn’t really
changed all that much.
The cornet was the king of the brass instruments. It was the
soprano member of the family. It was the instrument that all the
soloists played. However, we don’t have a single major piece
written by a major composer for the cornet. This is very unusual
because they all wrote for cornet in their orchestral works, but no
one wrote a concerto for us.
I have a theory about this. The cornet was kind of like what the
rock guitar is today. And more people play electric guitar than any
other instrument on the planet today. But I’ve never heard of a
composer writing a concerto for it, even though hundreds of
millions of people play it.
I think the cornet fell into the same problem, where it was such a
common instrument that composers just didn’t consider it to be
very serious. So although they wrote for it in an orchestral setting,
they didn’t write for it as a solo instrument. We have no pieces by
Beethoven, Brahms, or anyone, unlike the piano or violin.
By the 1920’s and 30’s, there were other developments in terms of
the size and shape of the instrument, but we’ve stuck with the 3-
valve system pretty much since the 1820’s to this day. And this
was the solo instrument, so guys like Arban, who is probably the
most famous and important cornetist in our history. He taught the
cornet class at the Paris Conservatory in the 1850’s. Then there’s
the tradition that kept going on where there’s the natural trumpet
taught by one professor, and in the same building the cornet being
taught by a different professor. They were separate entities in that
day and it was that way for years and years.
JN: Can you talk about Anton Weidinger, who first put keys on the natural trumpet. Why is it that Haydn wrote this piece, a concerto for Weidinger’s invention, but then the cornet becomes the default solo instrument. Why is it
that the trumpet didn’t take on that role initially?
MP: Weidinger is an important figure in the history of the trumpet
and cornet. He was involved in inventing that instrument. It was
basically taking a clarinet pad, and the instrument typically had 5
or 7 keys. He made his career out of two pieces: the concerto you
mentioned by Haydn, and another concerto three years later by
Hummel.
The problem with the instrument was that because of the nature of
how it created a sound, i.e. buzzing into a mouthpiece. When you
have an instrument with pads that open and close. Let’s say you
play into a recorder for example. When you uncover a key on the
recorder, that’s where the sound comes out of. So as you open
and close the holes, you’re lengthening and shortening the tube
that’s resonating. So the recorder evolved into the clarinet,
bassoon, etc. They’re more or less omni-directional instruments.
When you’re using a metal mouthpiece and buzzing into it, the
nature of that sound doesn’t work well with that tube
lengthening/shortening system. From accounts of people who
heard him play Haydn’s and Hummel’s concerto, the sound was
very uneven. So when he played a note with all the pads down, it
had a very natural, open trumpet sound. But when with the pads
open, the sound was very muffled. That’s why that instrument
didn’t survive, because of the very uneven scale.
The mechanism itself was not very agile. The keys are long, unlike
a clarinet which are short and agile. So while Weidinger had a run
of success with those two concerto’s, the instrument itself was too
inconsistent to last longer than him.
JN: Someone obviously saw the potential for this instrument to be successful. Was it that failure of Weidinger’s invention
that led to the cornet ultimately having lasting success?
MP: The Halary Company is who we credit with applying this new
technology that we call piston valves. This is around 1825. France
was the hotbed of development of the valve system. There were
dozens of companies making all sorts of valves in all sorts of
shapes and sizes. Part of the issue they struggled with in those
days is there was no sharing of information, unlike today where
many people are doing very similar things and they can share
information with each other if they choose to. Back then, everyone
was doing their own thing without knowing what anyone else was
doing. They’re basically inventing the same things at the same
time.
The shortcoming of the natural trumpet is that it only played open
notes. There were all these big gaps in the scale. Unless you were
playing very high, you couldn’t play a melody. So this is the
problem they were trying to overcome. Weidinger was successful
in addressing this issue, but ultimately was not successful because
of the issues I’ve already mentioned.
But the piston valves made more sense. They were faster and
more even in the tone. So it wasn’t necessarily a failure on
Weidinger’s part. It was just inventors continuing to experiment
with new technology until they found something that could create
the chromatic scale and be in tune and with an even tone.
JN: When did the trumpet adopt the piston valves like the cornet did?
MP: Not long after. But the trumpet was considered more of an
ensemble instrument, even among the ones that did have valves.
We see a lot of examples from the 1870’s and 80’s where
orchestral composers used the trumpet in their compositions.
Those trumpets were in F, a fourth below the modern Bb trumpet.
There was a clear distinction between the trumpet as an ensemble
instrument and the cornet as a solo instrument. Herbert L. Clarke
talked about this in his famous letter to Eldon Benge, who was a
trumpet player in the Chicago Symphony. Well, he played cornet
but was considering switching to trumpet. So Clarke wrote a letter
back to him saying that the trumpet is only appropriate in large
ensembles like an orchestra or band. It was
never to be thought of as a solo instrument.
But that changed and there was a big
struggle between the cornet players and the trumpet players. Even
people like Bunny Berrigan and even Louis Armstrong played the
cornet, just because that’s what everybody played at the time. But
as ensembles became louder, it made more sense for players to
play the trumpet. It was also easier to play in the upper register on
the trumpet. So as the swing era came on, the trumpet was a more
logical choice.
By the early 50’s, there were major works written for the trumpet
by people like Tomasi, Jolivet and Hindemith. A lot of the really
significant pieces written for the trumpet were written in the 1950’s.
And this was the beginning of the legitimization of the trumpet as a
solo instrument in the classical sense.
James Newcomb is a recovering trumpet
player turned Cornetist and founder of the
Cornet Revolution. He also hosts a popular
podcast titled, MusicPreneur: Making Money
Making Music.
Mark Ponzo is professor of trumpet at
Northern Illinois University. He also owns a
large collection of historic cornets, which he
lovingly refers to as “the herd.”