Simulations of simple Linoleic acid-containing Lipid Membranes and Models for the Soybean Plasma Membranes Xiaohong Zhuang, 1 Anna Ou, 1 and Jeffery B. Klauda 1, 2* 1 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and 2 Biophysics Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]Table S1a The comparison of DLiPC sorted simulated relaxation time T 1 (s) to the experimental data with hydrogen Larmor frequency ω C =90.80 MHz at 30 °C shown with the standard errors for three different replicas. Index Sim Exp 1 0.315 ± 0.004 0.272 ± 0.022 2 0.394 ± 0.004 0.385 ± 0.026 3 0.534 ± 0.007 0.512 ± 0.037 4 0.556 ± 0.005 0.593 ± 0.029 5 0.874 ± 0.008 0.759 ± 0.010 6 0.973 ± 0.011 0.964 ± 0.011 7 1.079 ± 0.006 0.964 ± 0.011 8 1.239 ± 0.014 0.987 ± 0.053 9 1.460 ± 0.028 1.015 ± 0.019 10 1.623 ± 0.021 1.687 ± 0.042 11 2.216 ± 0.021 2.264 ± 0.045 12 4.052 ± 0.038 4.292 ± 0.404
13
Embed
netserver.aip.orgnetserver.aip.org/epaps/jcp_biochem_phys/E-JCPSA6-146... · Web viewChemical structures of a few exemplary and lipids with the various head group and tail types in
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Simulations of simple Linoleic acid-containing Lipid Membranes and Models for the Soybean Plasma Membranes
Xiaohong Zhuang,1 Anna Ou,1 and Jeffery B. Klauda1, 2*
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and 2Biophysics Program, University of Maryland,
Table S1a The comparison of DLiPC sorted simulated relaxation time T1 (s) to the experimental data with hydrogen Larmor frequency ωC=90.80 MHz at 30 °C shown with the standard errors for three different replicas.
Table S1b The comparison of DLiPC simulated relaxation time T1 (s) of each carbon number to the corresponded original assigned experimental data with hydrogen Larmor frequency ωC=90.80 MHz at 30 °C shown with the standard errors for three different replicas.
Table S3a Clustering fractions of the hypocotyl soybean membranes shown with the standard errors for three different replicas. Yc is the fraction of lipids forming the cluster, Xo is the overall composition fraction, and Xc is the average fraction of lipid in the cluster.
Table S3b Clustering fractions of the root soybean membranes shown with the standard errors for three different replicas. Yc is the fraction of lipids forming the cluster, Xo is the overall composition fraction, and Xc is the average fraction of lipid in the cluster.
Figure S1. Chemical structures of a few exemplary and lipids with the various head group and tail types in the two soybean membrane systems. The double bonds are shown in red and the positions are shown in blue texts. Starting from the left, the lipids are 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidic acid (PLPA), 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PLPC), 1, 2-dilinoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DLiPE), 1, 2-dilinoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoinositol(DLiPI), and 1-linoleoyl-2-linolenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine (LLPS).
Figure S2. Surface area per lipid and the accumulative running average (Å2) as a function of time of the three replicate runs of a-c) SLPC, and d-f) DLiPC. The cumulative running average takes the average of all of the surface area per lipid (SA/lip) starting from the first time step (t=0 ns) up to the current time step.
Figure S3. The averaged deuterium order parameter (SCD) of sn-1 chain for a) SLPC and b) DLiPC.
Figure S4. Surface area per lipid and the accumulative running average (Å2) as a function of time of the three replicate runs of a-c) hypocotyl and d-f) root membranes. The cumulative running average takes the average of all of the surface area per lipid (SA/lip) starting from the first time step (t=0 ns) up to the current time step.
Figure S5. The comparison of the SCD of PLPC in hypocotyl and root membrane in a) sn-1 and b) sn-2 chain.
Figure S6. a) The component electron density profiles (EDP) of root membrane, which includes choline (Chol), ethanolamine (EolAm), inositol (Inos), serine (Ser), phosphate (Phos), glycerol (Gly), carbonyl (Carb), methine (CH), methylene (CH2), methyl (CH3), potassium ion (Pot), and water (Wat). b) The group EDP of stigmasterol, which includes OH, ring, and tail in hypocotyl (subscript H) and root membrane (subscript R).
Figure S7 An example result of the time analyses of lipid clustering on one root membrane system a) The number of clusters in each frame (Ncf) and the average number of lipid per cluster (Nlc) along time. b) the example of number of the component lipids forming clusters. The other lipid components of the root membrane are not shown for image clarity. c) the probability of the cluster composition of PL and LL lipids in a root membrane from varied simulation time (2-ns averaged block data, i.e. 90-92, 108-110, 128-130, and 148-150 ns).
Figure S8. The probability of cluster composition in the root membrane of a) sitosterol and PL lipids, b) sitosterol and LL lipids, c) stigmasterol and PL lipids, and d) stigmasterol and LL lipids.