Video cameras and photometry Dave Herald
Mar 26, 2015
Video cameras and photometry
Dave Herald
Background
• Occultations are usually step events• When video introduced, it overcame issues of
Personal Equation, increased the timing precision, and provided a mechanism to re-play events
• Measuring the change in brightness was not important
Background #2
• After several years experience, people became interested in measuring brightness changes
Double star discoveries – measure the relative brightness of the components
Occular – measure light drop and limiting magnitude, for event validation
Mutual events of Jupiter and Saturn’s satellites – generate light curves
Large stars – measure their diameter
Question
• How reliable are our analogue video cameras for photometry?
‘Traditional’ CCD camera
• CCD with array of pixels• No anti-bloom gating on CCD (linearity issue)• 1:1 correspondence between pixel and image
file. Imaged represented at 16 bits• Bias frame, dark frame and flat field applied to
imageImage with linear relationship to light intensity
across whole field. Precision of 0.002 mag readily obtainable with care.
Video issues #1• CCD with array of pixels• Array of pixels converted into an analogue signal
(x-direction), in multiple scan lines (y-direction) - with number of scan lines generally different to number of rows of pixels.
horizontal axis is analogue representation of pixels;Vertical axis – formed by combining pixels in
adjacent rows of the CCD1:1 correspondence to CCD pixels lost
Video issues #2
• Analogue signal digitised – to 8-bits• Signal frequently compressed. Depending on
compression algorithm:The compression is most likely not lossless;
andMay incorporate data from adjacent pixels in
both the compression and decompressionData integrity compromised
Video – issues #3
• CCD presumably has anti-bloom gating => non-linear response
• Video traditionally has a gamma correction applied => non-linear response
• Darks and flat fields are not usually applied => non-uniform fields
Standard video images are not well suited to photometry
Example #1 - Derek Breit video
• Yellow star at 3,600 – Tycho V = 6.7• Pink star at 1,200 = 0.33 of yellow = 1.2 mag fainter => mag
7.9. HOWEVER Tycho V= 7.3• Pink star should be at height 2070=> Measured brightness star brightness
Example #2 – flat fielding
• Video of star near moon, 40cm ACF with 3x reducer.• Plot shows field brightness in horizontal line across
field & thru the star. Plot shows the background is 50% brighter in center of image
Example #2 – flat fielding
• Limovie & Tangra both measure a changing star brightness as it crosses the field – in this case more than a 50% change
Variation in background illumination and star brightness consistent with a need for a flat field
Example 3 – camera response• Integrating camera• Change integration period – keeping stars in
the same position. Measure star brightness• If camera response is linear, ratios of star
brightness should remain the same {Using brightness ratio avoids any need to precisely determine
the exposure duration. Keeping stars in the same position avoids any flat-fielding issues}
Watec 120N+ with Gamma ‘off’
• 1 : 1.7 : 3• 1 : 2 : 4• 1 : 2.2 : 4.7• 1 : 2.5 : 7• 1 : 2.4 : 9
Ratios relative to pink are:
=> Camera response definitely non-linear with respect to intensity
Watec 120N+ with Gamma ‘hi’
• 1 : 2 : 5.7• 1 : 2 : 4.2• 1 : 1.8 : 3.7• 1 : 1.2 : 2.3• 1 : 1.2 : 2.2
Ratios relative to pink are:
=> Camera response definitely non-linear with respect to intensity
Effect of gamma on long recordings• Gamma changes the recorded brightness depending on
the brightness of the object • Star brightness changes as air mass changes (i.e. a star
gets fainter as its altitude decreases)• Without gamma, two stars (or moons) of similar
brightness retain same brightness ratio• With gamma, ratio of recorded brightness changes as
star altitude changes. Normalising one object on the basis of another object of
non-identical brightness will induce an apparent change in brightness as the altitude changes
Summary
• Compared to usual CCD photometry, analogue video photometry presents serious challenges
• Video systems are usually non-linear – need to understand the non-linearity in the recording system as a whole (camera + avi creator + recording software/hardware)
• Flats and darks are essential for decent photometry