Top Banner
Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics
16
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Vertebrate Evolution:Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics

Page 2: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Using Artificial Life to Study Extinct Life

Page 3: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Study life as it was.

Page 4: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Ideal explanations of adaptation

1. Genetics (type, heritability, interactions).

2. Polarity (ancestral and derived states).

3. Function in the ecological situation.

1. Population structure (demography, gene flow).

2. Selection environment (spatial & temporal patterns).

3. Responses to selection in that environment (outcomes).

Population-level Information

Trait-level Information

Brandon, R. (1990). Adaptation & Environment

Page 5: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Solution? ALife

The Artificial Life Cycle for Biorobotics

Page 6: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Solution? ALife

1. Genetics.2. Polarity3. Function in the

ecological situation.

1. Population structure.2. Selection environment.3. Responses to selection

in that environment

The Artificial Life Cycle for Biorobotics

Page 7: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Question: Why did vertebrae evolve multiple times independently?

Photo by Flickr user hankplank Photo by Flickr user tobze

Radiograph by Marianne Porter

Page 8: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Hypothesis: Vertebrae are an adaptation for enhanced predator avoidance during foraging

Page 9: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.
Page 10: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

+ + =

biomimetic notochord

porcine gelatin crosslinked in 1.0 % glutaraldehyde

insert and caudal finring vertebrae

Delrin™

b

artificial vertebral column

Page 11: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

Prey

Predator

1

1

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

4050

50

60

60

70

80

70

80

90

100

90

100

escape

160 160

relative fitness, , rewards —foraging u, average velocity (ms-1) R, average distance from light (m)

predator avoidance D, average distance from predator (m) a, peak escape acceleration (ms-2) , startle responses

For individual i in generation j.Population size = 6.

The individuals with the top three ’s are awarded 6, 4, and 2, gametes, respectively, for the mating pool.

Page 12: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

new individuals

diploid parentsn = 6 n = 3

selection

meiosis and mutation

randomized mating

n = 6

offspringgene pool

n = 12

ζ N

b

haploid gametes

n = 6

diploid offspring

N

N

b b ζ ζ

reproductives

Page 13: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

N, number of

vertebrae

Page 14: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

z, predator detection threshold

(mm)

Page 15: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.

b, caudal fin span (mm)

Page 16: Vertebrate Evolution: Testing Adaptation Hypotheses using Biorobotics.