PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation Version 5.0 February 26, 2013 RTIP ID# (required) RIV111203 TCWG Consideration Date May 23, 2017 Project Description (clearly describe project) The City of Lake Elsinore (City), in cooperation with Caltrans District 8, proposes to replace and realign the Temescal Canyon Road Bridge (Bridge No. 56C0050) over the Temescal Wash, which is located 0.42 mile west of Lake Street. The proposed bridge is 98-feet wide (with a curb-to-curb width of 80 feet), 306 feet long, and a structure depth of 5 feet. The bridge will be striped with a 14-foot painted median, two 12-foot inside lanes, two 15-foot outside lanes, two 6-foot shoulders that can accommodate a Class II bike lane, and two 6-foot sidewalks separated from vehicular traffic with a concrete barrier. Alternative 1. No Build Alternative. Alternative 2. Replace and realign the 2-lane Temescal Canyon Road Bridge with two 12-foot inside lanes, two 15-foot outside lanes, 14-foot painted median two 6-foot Class II bike lane, and two 6-foot sidewalks. Type of Project (use Table 1 on instruction sheet) Change to existing regionally significant street. County Riverside Narrative Location/Route & Postmiles Temescal Canyon Road Bridge (Bridge No. 56C0050) which is located 0.42 mile west of Lake Street, nearby the Interstate 15 and Lake Street Interchange. Caltrans Projects – EA# BRLO 5074 (015) Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Contact Person Brad Fagrell Phone# (951) 674-3124 ext. 212 Fax# (951) 471-1261 Email [email protected]Hot Spot Pollutant of Concern (check one or both) PM2.5 X PM10 X Federal Action for which Project-Level PM Conformity is Needed (check appropriate box) X Categorical Exclusion (NEPA) EA or Draft EIS FONSI or Final EIS PS&E or Construction Other Scheduled Date of Federal Action: June 2017 NEPA Assignment – Project Type (check appropriate box) Exempt Section 326 –Categorical Exemption X Section 327 – Non-Categorical Exemption Current Programming Dates (as appropriate) PE/Environmental ENG ROW CON Start 2012 2017 2018 2019 End 2017 2019 2019 2020 Project Purpose and Need (Summary): (attach additional sheets as necessary) The purpose of the project is to replace the existing functionally obsolete bridge and with a new bridge and roadway that provides sufficient hydraulic clearance of Temescal Wash and can safely and reliably accommodate anticipated traffic volumes and design speeds consistent with City circulation plans and regional transportation planning for the facility. The project is needed for the following reasons: • The existing bridge structure does not provide adequate channel cross section and freeboard to convey the 100-year flood waters. The clear channel depth of 1.5 feet below the bridge soffit is undersized and causes flood waters to backup and overtop the bridge
96
Embed
Version 5.0 February 26, 2013 Document Library/4.1-5 RIV11120… · Version 5.0 February 26, 2013 RTIP ID# (required) RIV111203 TCWG Consideration Date May 23, 2017 Project ... two
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation
Version 5.0 February 26, 2013
RTIP ID# (required) RIV111203 TCWG Consideration Date May 23, 2017
Project Description (clearly describe project) The City of Lake Elsinore (City), in cooperation with Caltrans District 8, proposes to replace and realign the Temescal Canyon Road Bridge (Bridge No. 56C0050) over the Temescal Wash, which is located 0.42 mile west of Lake Street. The proposed bridge is 98-feet wide (with a curb-to-curb width of 80 feet), 306 feet long, and a structure depth of 5 feet. The bridge will be striped with a 14-foot painted median, two 12-foot inside lanes, two 15-foot outside lanes, two 6-foot shoulders that can accommodate a Class II bike lane, and two 6-foot sidewalks separated from vehicular traffic with a concrete barrier. Alternative 1. No Build Alternative. Alternative 2. Replace and realign the 2-lane Temescal Canyon Road Bridge with two 12-foot inside lanes, two 15-foot outside lanes, 14-foot painted median two 6-foot Class II bike lane, and two 6-foot sidewalks.
Type of Project (use Table 1 on instruction sheet) Change to existing regionally significant street.
County Riverside
Narrative Location/Route & Postmiles Temescal Canyon Road Bridge (Bridge No. 56C0050) which is located 0.42 mile west of Lake Street, nearby the Interstate 15 and Lake Street Interchange. Caltrans Projects – EA# BRLO 5074 (015)
Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Contact Person Brad Fagrell
Phone# (951) 674-3124 ext. 212
Fax# (951) 471-1261
Email [email protected] Hot Spot Pollutant of Concern (check one or both) PM2.5 X PM10 X
Federal Action for which Project-Level PM Conformity is Needed (check appropriate box)
X Categorical Exclusion (NEPA)
EA or Draft EIS FONSI or Final
EIS PS&E or Construction Other
Scheduled Date of Federal Action: June 2017 NEPA Assignment – Project Type (check appropriate box)
Exempt Section 326 –Categorical Exemption X
Section 327 – Non-Categorical Exemption
Current Programming Dates (as appropriate) PE/Environmental ENG ROW CON
Start 2012 2017 2018 2019 End 2017 2019 2019 2020
Project Purpose and Need (Summary): (attach additional sheets as necessary) The purpose of the project is to replace the existing functionally obsolete bridge and with a new bridge and roadway that provides sufficient hydraulic clearance of Temescal Wash and can safely and reliably accommodate anticipated traffic volumes and design speeds consistent with City circulation plans and regional transportation planning for the facility. The project is needed for the following reasons:
• The existing bridge structure does not provide adequate channel cross section and freeboard to convey the 100-year flood waters. The clear channel depth of 1.5 feet below the bridge soffit is undersized and causes flood waters to backup and overtop the bridge
PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation
Version 5.0 February 26, 2013
deck and its roadway approaches. The existing bridge essentially is serving as a low flow concrete culvert of an equivalent low water crossing which was frequently inundated during the winter storms.
• The existing bridge’s rating of “Functionally Obsolete (FO)” is caused by the narrow curb-to-curb width that is “basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement” and the aforementioned hydraulic deficiency. The bridge’s Sufficiency Rating of 68.5, equates to an existing structure that is deteriorated and requires “prompt structural correction.”
• The existing structure is on a sharp curved alignment at the west approach for the eastbound traffic, which can only accommodate a safe design speed of 30 to 40 MPH. Safe travel speeds are reduced to less than 30 MPH on the existing bridge’s 10-foot travel lanes. This speed is not acceptable from a traffic operation standpoint as Temescal Canyon Road serves as a Major Highway requiring a design speed of 55 MPH (for flat terrain) per City’s General Plan. Temescal Canyon Road.
• Temescal Canyon Road (and the existing bridge) Bridge provides east/west access crossing the Temescal Wash and serves as a critical frontage road paralleling I-15. This roadway provides an emergency route between the Indian Truck Trail Interchange and the Lake Street Interchange. Major traffic can be expected on Temescal Canyon Road when the traffic flow on the I-15 is impacted. Continuing increase of traffic volumes on Temescal Canyon Road due to the regional population growth and planned private developments has increased the importance of the road in the regional traffic circulation system.
Opening Year: Build and No Build LOS, AADT, % and # trucks, truck AADT of proposed facility Temescal Canyon Road Bridge – Opening Year 2021.
Alternative 1 (No Build Alt) ADT=10,380, Truck ADT=467 (4.5%), LOS C [Collector Rd Capacity 13,000]
Alternative 2. (Build Alt) ADT=10,380, Truck ADT=467 (4.5%), LOS A [Major Road Capacity 34,100]
Based on the Revised Traffic Assessment for the Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore (May 5, 2017), the proposed Build Alternatives during Opening year 2021 would increase the capacity of Temescal Canyon Road from 13,000 to 34,100 vehicle per day. However, the estimated 10,380 daily traffic volumes during Opening Year 2021 for both Build and No Build Alternatives would not exceed the 125,000 average daily trips criteria for a POAQC. In addition, truck volumes represent approximately 4.5 percent of the overall traffic volumes on Temescal Canyon Road and would not exceed the 8 percent criteria, and the total truck average annual daily traffic (AADT) would not exceed the 10,000-vehicle criteria for POAQC. In summary, LOS would generally improve (i.e., delay would be reduced) and no significant project impacts would occur.
RTP Horizon Year / Design Year: Build and No Build LOS, AADT, % and # trucks, truck AADT of proposed facility Temescal Canyon Road Bridge
Alternative 1 (No Build Alt) ADT=28,600 Truck ADT=1,287(4.5%), LOS F [Collector Rd Capacity 13,000]
Alternative 2. (Build Alt) ADT=48,400 Truck ADT=2,178 (4.5%), LOS F [Major Road Capacity 34,100]
Based on the Revised Traffic Assessment for the Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project (May 2017), Both Build and No Build Alternatives during Horizon Year 2040 would operating at adverse levels of service along Temescal Canyon Road. However, the estimated 48,400 daily traffic volumes during Horizon Year 2040 would not exceed the 125,000 average daily trips criteria for a POAQC. In addition, truck volumes represent approximately 4.5 percent of the overall traffic volumes on Temescal Canyon Road and would not exceed the 8 percent criteria, and the total truck average annual daily traffic (AADT) would not exceed the 10,000-vehicle criteria for POAQC. Please note that while these Temescal Canyon Road segments operate at adverse levels of service, the LOS improves under the (Build) conditions due to the widening of the bridge and adjoining roadway to four lanes.
PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation
Version 5.0 February 26, 2013
Opening Year: If facility is an interchange(s) or intersection(s), Build and No Build cross-street AADT, % and # trucks, truck AADT Not Applicable RTP Horizon Year / Design Year: If facility is an interchange (s) or intersection(s), Build and No Build cross-street AADT, % and # trucks, truck AADT Not Applicable
Describe potential traffic redistribution effects of congestion relief (impact on other facilities) Temescal Canyon Road in its ultimate condition will consist of 4 lanes and be realigned along with the Temescal Creek Bridge in order to link directly to Lake Street at a greater distance from the I-15/Lake Street Interchange. Temescal Canyon Road will also connect to the proposed new Lincoln Road under the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan, which will consist of 4 lanes as it moves south. The existing Lake Street, which will serve as the northern gateway to the City of Lake Elsinore, will be realigned and widened but not as a part of this project. Lake Street is a major thoroughfare off the I-15 Freeway and will serve as the main entrance into Alberhill Villages. In addition, a new widened Temescal Canyon Road bridge will extend over Temescal Creek west of Lake Street.
Comments/Explanation/Details (attach additional sheets as necessary)
The proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project. The proposed project is also consistent with Southern California Association of governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) (RTP and FTIP ID RIV111203) and is intended to meet the traffic needs in the area based on local land use plans. The proposed project is located within a nonattainment area for federal PM2.5 standard and maintenance area for federal PM10 standard. Therefore, per 40 CFR Part 93 hot-spot analyses are required for conformity purposes. However, the EPA does not require hot-spot analyses, qualitative or quantitative, for projects that are not listed in 40 CFR Section 93.123(b)(1) as an air quality concern. The project does not qualify as a project of air quality concern (POAQC) because of the following reasons:
1. The proposed project is not a new or expanded highway project. The proposed project is a bridge reconstruction and realignment project (Temescal Canyon Road Bridge) that would increase the future capacity of the Temescal Canyon Road. This type of project improves the roadway operations by increasing the capacity of the bridge and accommodating the new vehicle operations from the City approved Alberhill Village development project. Based on the Revised Traffic Assessment for the Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore – (May 2017), the proposed Build Alternatives during Opening year 2021 would increase the capacity of Temescal Canyon Road from 13,000 to 34,100 vehicle per day. However, the estimated 10,380 daily traffic volumes during Opening Year 2021 would not exceed the 125,000 average daily trips criteria for a POAQC. In addition, truck volumes represent approximately 4.5 percent of the overall traffic volumes on Temescal Canyon Road and would not exceed the 8 percent criteria, and the total truck average annual daily traffic (AADT) would not exceed the 10,000-vehicle criteria for POAQC. The estimated truck percentage was obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the Alberhill Village Specific Plan (October 2015).
2. The proposed project does include interchanges or intersections.
3. The proposed project does not include the construction of a new bus or rail terminal.
4. The proposed project does not expand an existing bus or rail terminal.
5. The proposed project is not in or affecting locations, areas, or categories of sites that are identified in the PM2.5 and PM10 applicable implementation plan or implementation plan submission, as appropriate, as sites of violation or possible violation.
Therefore, the proposed Build Alternative met the CAA requirements and 40 CFR 93.116 without any explicit hot-spot analysis. The proposed Build Alternative would not create a new, or worsen an existing, PM10 or PM2.5 violation. The proposed project does not have the potential to be a PQAQC.
; /3<,=,* )? @AB4+ C <3DDA EF 294A:A 29GH4 I/<G/ F 294A:A 29
C 0J/2D H <: /<A 3BKL6M F 3J3EA: 0N )OPQ+K 39/GQ 3AB 0 O 2B @8/ORF 1 3:A 2KL6C 0J/2D H <: /<A 3BKL6M F 3J3EA: 0N )OPQ+K 39/GQ 3AB 0 O 2B @8/ORF 1 3:A 2KL6ORF S 9E T; /GR > 2
U VW XYXZ[\] \_a_b a\c defgh ij k \l Xmn oXXnpq orc sXt aonr a_u^ a]] X[n aoUv dwwwxy
; /3<,=ä= )? @AB4+ C <3DDA EF 294A:A 29GH4 I/<G/ F 294A:A 29
C 0J/2D H <: /<A 3BKL6M F 3J3EA: 0åæ )OPQ+K 39/GQ 3AB 0 O 2B @8/ORF 1 3:A 2KL6C 0J/2D H <: /<A 3BKL6M F 3J3EA: 0åæ )OPQ+K 39/GQ 3AB 0 O 2B @8/ORF 1 3:A 2KL6ORF S 9E T; /GR > 2
U VW XYXZ[\] \_a_b a\c defgh ij k \l Xmn oXXnpq orc sXt aonr a_u^ a]] X[n aoUv dwwwxy
,ç èé==, T,==ê} \~ aov� dUww��
äç èä==* Tä*ëê ì= Tíç*; /G
x VW XYXZ[\] \_a_b a\c defgh ij k \l Xmn oXXnp�c~ ar _r _sb a\c �\u^ a]] X[n aoUv dwwwxy
SOURCE: USGS 7.5' Quad - Lake Elsinore (1988), CAI:\ACN1401\GIS\Fig_1_ProjectLocation.mxd (3/31/2017)
FIGURE 1
Temescal Canyon Road Bridge ProjectProject Location and Vicinity
BRLS 5074(015)
Project Vicinity
LEGENDProject Location
0 1000 2000FEET
JasonL
Polygon
Show this portion with grey shading to indicate that this portion will be completed by others.
JasonL
Polygon
City of Lake Elsinore's proposed project
BERKELEY CARLSBAD
FRESNO IRVINE
PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 260, Carlsbad, California 92011 760.931.5471 www.lsa.net
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 8, 2017
TO: Shirley Medina, Riverside County Transportation Commission
Anthony Liao, Caltrans District 8
FROM: Michael Slavick, LSA, Senior Air Quality Specialist
On behalf of Brad Fagrell, City of Lake Elsinore
SUBJECT: PM Hot Spot Interagency Form for RIV111203 for the upcoming TCWG Reviews at the May 23, 2017 meeting
At the request of the City of Lake Elsinore, LSA has prepared the project-level PM hot-spot analysis form for submittal to the SCAG’s Transportation Conformity Working Group (TCWG) for discussion and review of the proposed Temescal Canyon Road Bridge Replacement and Realignment Project. The Proposed Project is included in the SCAG 2016 RTP and the 2017 FTIP under Project ID: RIV111203 (Description: Bridge Replacement/Realignment: Replace Temescal Canyon Road two lane bridge with a four lane bridge over Temescal Wash). The PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis was prepared using the available traffic data from the Revised Traffic Assessment for the Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers (May 5, 2017).
The Proposed Project is within a nonattainment area for federal PM2.5 and within an attainment/maintenance area for federal PM10 standards. Per 40 CFR, Part 93, analyses are required for conformity purposes. However, the EPA does not require hot-spot analyses, qualitative or quantitative, for projects that are not listed in Section 93.123(b)(1) as an air quality concern. Upon review of the traffic data, LSA suggested that the Proposed Project does not qualify as a project of air quality concern (POAQC). Please accept this form for your review and discussion at the upcoming SCAG’s TCWG May 23, 2017 meeting.
MEMORANDUM
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to provide the following
revised memorandum for the Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project in the City of Lake
Elsinore, California. The following memo summarizes the traffic mix for existing
conditions, discusses the preparation of peak hour traffic volume data at sixteen (16)
roadway segments and three (3) study intersections for Existing, Year 2040 (No Build)
and Year 2040 (Build) traffic conditions, discusses the development of average annual
daily traffic (AADT) volumes and conducts LOS analyses along Temescal Canyon
Road for Year 2021 and Year 2040 traffic conditions, and presents figures that illustrate
these volumes.
STUDY AREA
Existing, Year 2040 (No Build) and Year 2040 (Build) peak hour traffic volumes
have been developed at the following sixteen (16) segments within the immediate
vicinity of the Project:
I-15 Mainline Segments
1. I-15 Northbound, south of I-15 Northbound Off-Ramp
2. I-15 Northbound, between I-15 NB Off-Ramp and I-15 NB On-Ramp
3. I-15 Northbound, north of I-15 Northbound On-Ramp
4. I-15 Southbound, north of I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp
5. I-15 Southbound, between I-15 SB Off-Ramp and I-15 SB On-Ramp
6. I-15 Southbound, south of I-15 Southbound On-Ramp
I-15 Ramp Segments
1. I-15 Northbound Off-Ramp to Lake Street
2. I-15 Northbound On-Ramp from Lake Street
3. I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp to Lake Street
4. I-15 Southbound On-Ramp from Lake Street
Temescal Canyon Road Segments
1. Temescal Canyon Road, north of Lincoln Avenue
2. Temescal Canyon Road, between Lincoln Avenue and Lake Street
Lake Street Segments
1. Lake Street, south of Temescal Canyon Road
2. Lake Street, between Temescal Canyon Road and I-15 SB Ramps
3. Lake Street, between I-15 SB Ramps and I-15 NB Ramps
4. Lake Street, north of I-15 Northbound Ramps
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 2
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic segment volumes for the ten (10) key roadway
segments, excluding the six (6) mainline segments, were derived from counts
conducted by Counts Unlimited on December 13, 2016 at the following three (3)
intersections:
Key Intersections
1. Lake Street at I-15 Northbound Ramps
2. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps
3. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road
The existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are comprised of passenger
vehicles, large 2-axle trucks, 3-axle trucks and 4+ axle trucks. The truck traffic
turning movements were converted to passenger car equivalents (P.C.E.’s) using
SANBAG approved factors. P.C.E. factors of 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 were utilized for large
2-axle trucks, 3-axle trucks and 4+ axle trucks, respectively. Table 1 presents a
summary of the existing vehicle classification split for each of the sixteen (16)
roadway segments. Appendix A contains the existing intersection turning movement
count worksheets.
The freeway peak-hour traffic volume forecast at the six (6) mainline segments were
developed through the utilization of the Caltrans traffic counts, and is consistent with
the Caltrans Methodology. Using the base year (Year 2015) segment volumes
provided on Caltrans website, directional peak-hour segment volumes were calculated
and using K- and D-factors. A K-factor is the percentage of AADT in both directions
during the peak hour. A D-factor is the percentage of traffic in the peak direction
during the peak hour. The Year 2015 volumes were grown by 2% per year to reflect
Year 2017 Existing traffic conditions.
Figures 1 and 2 present the AM and PM peak hour Existing traffic volumes,
respectively, at the six (6) I-15 Mainline Segments, the four (4) I-15 Ramps, the two
(2) Temescal Canyon Road segments, and the four (4) Lake Street segments.
Additionally, Figures 1 and 2 present the turning movement volumes at the three (3)
intersections as mentioned above.
YEAR 2040 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Year 2040 (No Build) Traffic Volumes
Year 2040 (No Build) AM and PM peak hour traffic segment volumes for the ten (10)
key roadway segments, excluding the six (6) mainline segments, were derived from
Year 2035 Without Project volume forecasts at the following three (3) intersections as
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 3
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
presented in the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan TIA, prepared by LLG Engineers,
dated February 25, 2013:
Key Intersections
1. Lake Street at I-15 Northbound Ramps
2. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps
3. Lake Street at “A” Street
The Year 2035 forecasted traffic volumes were grown by 2% per year for five years.
This results in a ten percent (10%) growth in Year 2035 volumes in order to derive
Year 2040 volumes. The forecasted Year 2040 volumes at these three (3)
intersections were then used to derive peak hour roadway segment volumes at
adjacent segments.
The Alberhill Villages Specific Plan TIA does not contain traffic volume data for the
I-15 mainline segments. The freeway peak-hour traffic volume forecast at the six (6)
mainline segments for Year 2040 traffic conditions were developed through the
utilization of the City of Lake Elsinore Transportation and Analysis Model
(LETAM), obtained by LSA Associates, Inc. Model runs have been conducted for
Base (Year 2007) and Future (Year 2035) scenarios. The growth between these
scenarios, for both the AM and PM peak hour, was then added on top of the existing
volumes. It should be noted that the growth was increased further in order to derive
Year 2040 (Build) traffic volumes. Lastly, the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan trips
were then subtracted from the mainline segments to derive Year 2040 (No Build)
traffic volumes.
Figures 3 and 4 present the anticipated AM and PM peak hour Year 2040 (No Build)
traffic volumes, respectively, at the six (6) I-15 Mainline Segments, the four (4) I-15
Ramps, the two (2) Temescal Canyon Road segments, and the four (4) Lake Street
segments. Additionally, Figures 3 and 4 present the turning movement volumes at the
three (3) intersections used to derive the adjacent roadway segment peak hour
volumes.
Year 2040 (Build) Traffic Volumes
Year 2040 (Build) AM and PM peak hour traffic segment volumes for the ten (10)
key roadway segments, excluding the six (6) mainline segments, were derived from
Year 2035 volume forecasts at the following four (4) intersections as presented in the
Alberhill Villages Specific Plan TIA, prepared by LLG Engineers, dated October 14,
2015:
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 4
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
Key Intersections
1. Lake Street at I-15 Northbound Ramps
2. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps
3. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road
4. Lincoln Street at Temescal Canyon Road
The Year 2035 With Project forecasted traffic volumes were grown by 2% per year
for five years. This results in a ten percent (10%) growth in Year 2035 volumes in
order to derive Year 2040 volumes. The forecasted Year 2040 volumes at these four
(4) intersections were then used to derive peak hour roadway segment volumes at
adjacent segments.
The Alberhill Villages Specific Plan TIA does not contain traffic volume data for the
I-15 mainline segments. The freeway peak-hour traffic volume forecast at the six (6)
mainline segments for Year 2040 traffic conditions were developed through the
utilization of the City of Lake Elsinore Transportation and Analysis Model
(LETAM), obtained by LSA Associates, Inc. Model runs have been conducted for
Base (Year 2007) and Future (Year 2035) scenarios. The growth between these
scenarios, for both the AM and PM peak hour, was then added on top of the existing
volumes. It should be noted that the growth was increased further in order to derive
Year 2040 (Build) traffic volumes.
Figures 5 and 6 present the anticipated AM and PM peak hour Year 2040 (Build)
traffic volumes, respectively, at the six (6) I-15 Mainline Segments, the four (4) I-15
Ramps, the two (2) Temescal Canyon Road segments, and the four (4) Lake Street
segments. Additionally, Figures 5 and 6 present the turning movement volumes at the
four (4) intersections used to derive the adjacent roadway segment peak hour
volumes.
AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC ROADWAY SEGMENT VOLUMES
Year 2021 (No Build) Traffic Volumes
Year 2021 daily traffic segment volumes for the two (2) key roadway segments were
derived through utilization of the City of Lake Elsinore Transportation and Analysis
Model (LETAM). Model runs have been conducted for the Base (Year 2007) and
Future (Year 2035) scenarios. It should be noted that Year 2021 (No Build) and Year
2021 (Build) traffic scenarios will yield the same volumes along Temescal Canyon
Road regardless of the road realignment (Build scenario).
Existing daily traffic segment volumes for the two (2) key roadway segments were
derived from Existing (Year 2015) traffic volumes as presented in the Alberhill
Villages Specific Plan TIA, prepared by LLG Engineers, dated October 14, 2015.
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 5
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
The Existing traffic volume was grown by 2% per year for two years. This results in a
four percent (4%) growth in Year 2015 volumes in order to derive Year 2017
volumes.
The interpolated growth for Year 2021 utilizing the 2007 Model run and the 2035
Model run was added on top of the Year 2017 Existing volumes in order to determine
the Year 2021 traffic volumes. Figure 7 presents the anticipated Year 2021 daily
traffic volumes at the two (2) Temescal Canyon Road segments.
Year 2021 (Build) Traffic Volumes
It should be noted that the Year 2021 (No Build) and (Build) traffic volumes are the
same since Alberhill Villages Specific Plan and Lincoln Street would not be built.
The only difference is the realignment of Temescal Canyon Road, which would not
have an affect on the traffic volumes.
Year 2040 (No Build) Traffic Volumes
Year 2040 (No Build) daily traffic segment volumes for the two (2) key roadway
segments were derived from Year 2035 Without Project volume forecasts as
presented in the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan TIA, prepared by LLG Engineers,
dated February 25, 2013.
The Year 2035 forecasted traffic volume was grown by 2% per year for five years.
This results in a ten percent (10%) growth in Year 2035 volumes in order to derive
Year 2040 volumes. Figure 8 presents the anticipated Year 2040 (No Build) daily
traffic volumes at the two (2) Temescal Canyon Road segments.
Year 2040 (Build) Traffic Volumes
Year 2040 (Build) daily traffic segment volumes for the two (2) key roadway
segments were derived from Year 2035 Without Project volume forecasts as
presented in the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan TIA, prepared by LLG Engineers,
dated October 14, 2015.
The Year 2035 forecasted traffic volume was grown by 2% per year for five years.
This results in a ten percent (10%) growth in Year 2035 volumes in order to derive
Year 2040 volumes. Figure 8 also presents the anticipated Year 2040 (No Build)
daily traffic volumes at the two (2) Temescal Canyon Road segments.
AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS
In conformance with the City of Lake Elsinore requirements, daily operating
conditions for the key study roadway segments along Temescal Canyon Road have
been investigated according to the Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio of each roadway
segment. The V/C relationship is used to estimate the LOS of the roadway segment
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 6
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
with the volume based on the 24-hour traffic volumes and the capacity based on the
City’s classification of each roadway. The six qualitative categories of Level of
Service have been defined along with the corresponding Volume to Capacity (V/C)
value range and are shown in Table 2.
The roadway segment daily capacity of each street classification according to the City
of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR (August 2011) is presented
in Table 3.
According to City of Lake Elsinore criteria, LOS D is the minimum acceptable
condition that should be maintained along all roadway segments.
Year 2021 (No Build) Traffic Conditions
Table 4 summarizes the daily level of service results at the key study roadway
segments during a “typical” weekday for the Year 2021 (No Build) traffic conditions.
The first column (1) in Table 4 presents LOS E daily roadway capacity values from
the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR, dated August
2011, the number of travel lanes, as well as forecasts the Year 2021 (No Build) traffic
conditions. It should be noted that for Year 2021 (No Build) traffic conditions, it is
assumed that Temescal Canyon Road will remain to be a 2-lane, undivided roadway
along the bridge as well as the adjoining roadway.
Review of column (1) of Table 4 indicates that for the Year 2021 (No Build) traffic
conditions, both of the key study roadway segments are forecast to operate at
acceptable levels of service on a daily basis when compared to the LOS standards
defined in this report.
Year 2021 (Build) Traffic Conditions
Table 4 also summarizes the daily level of service results at the key study roadway
segments during a “typical” weekday for the Year 2021 (Build) traffic conditions.
The second column (2) in Table 4 presents LOS E daily roadway capacity values
from the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR, dated
August 2011, the number of travel lanes, as well as forecasts the Year 2021 (Build)
traffic conditions. The third column (3) of Table 4 presents the increase in the V/C
ratio and indicates whether the roadway segment operates at an adverse level of
service based on the LOS standards and the impact criteria defined in this report. It
should be noted that for Year 2021 (Build) traffic conditions, it is assumed that the
bridge portion of Temescal Canyon Road will be widened to a 4-lane, divided
roadway while the adjoining roadway will remain 2-lanes and undivided. Transition
lanes will be constructed on either side of the bridge along the adjoining roadway in
order to allow vehicles to appropriately utilize the four lanes on the bridge.
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 7
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
Review of column (2) of Table 4 indicates that for the Year 2021 (Build) traffic
conditions, both of the key study roadway segments are forecast to operate at
acceptable levels of service on a daily basis when compared to the LOS standards
defined in this report.
Year 2040 (No Build) Traffic Conditions
Table 5 summarizes the daily level of service results at the key study roadway
segments during a “typical” weekday for the Year 2040 (No Build) traffic conditions.
The first column (1) in Table 5 presents LOS E daily roadway capacity values from
the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR, dated August
2011, the number of travel lanes, as well as forecasts the Year 2040 (No Build) traffic
conditions. It should be noted that for Year 2040 (No Build) traffic conditions, it is
assumed that Temescal Canyon Road will remain to be a 2-lane, undivided roadway
along the bridge as well as the adjoining roadway.
Review of column (1) of Table 5 indicates that for the Year 2040 (No Build) traffic
conditions, both of the key study roadway segments are forecast to operate at
unacceptable levels of service on a daily basis when compared to the LOS standards
defined in this report. The roadway segments operating at adverse levels of service
are:
Daily
Key Roadway Segment Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
1. Temescal Canyon Road, west of Lincoln Street (Bridge Portion) 28,600 2.200 F
2. Temescal Canyon Road, east of Lincoln Street (Adjoining roadway) 28,600 2.200 F
Year 2040 (Build) Traffic Conditions
Table 5 also summarizes the daily level of service results at the key study roadway
segments during a “typical” weekday for the Year 2040 (Build) traffic conditions.
The second column (2) in Table 5 presents LOS E daily roadway capacity values
from the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR, dated
August 2011, the number of travel lanes, as well as forecasts the Year 2040 (Build)
traffic conditions. The third column (3) of Table 5 presents the increase in the V/C
ratio and indicates whether the roadway segment operates at an adverse level of
service based on the LOS standards and the impact criteria defined in this report. It
should be noted that for Year 2040 (Build) traffic conditions, it is assumed that both
the bridge portion of Temescal Canyon Road as well as the adjoining roadway will be
widened to a 4-lane, divided roadway.
Ms. Lynn Hayes
May 5, 2017
Page 8
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
Review of column (2) of Table 5 indicates that for the Year 2040 (Build) traffic
conditions, both of the key study roadway segments are forecast to operate at
unacceptable levels of service on a daily basis when compared to the LOS standards
defined in this report. The roadway segments operating at adverse levels of service
are:
Daily
Key Roadway Segment Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
1. Temescal Canyon Road, west of Lincoln Street (Bridge Portion) 48,400 1.419 F
2. Temescal Canyon Road, east of Lincoln Street (Adjoining roadway) 38,500 1.219 F
Please note that while these segments operate at adverse levels of service, the LOS
improves under the (Build) conditions due to the widening of the bridge and
adjoining roadway to four lanes.
* * * * * * * * * * *
Please let us know if you have any comments or questions regarding this response
memorandum.
Attachments
cc: Keil D. Maberry, P.E., Principal, LLG
Jason Lui, LSA Associates, Inc.
Ambarish Mukherjee, LSA Associates, Inc.
Michael Slavick, LSA Associates, Inc.
File
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
TABLE 1
EXISTING VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION SPLIT SUMMARY1
Key Intersection
Time
Period
(1)
Vehicle Classification Split
Existing Traffic Conditions
Passenger
Vehicles
Large 2 Axle
Vehicles
3 Axle
Vehicles
4 Axle
Vehicles Total
I-15 Mainline Segments2
1. I-15 Northbound,
South of I-15 Northbound Off-Ramp
AM 94.7% 0.8% 1.3% 3.2% 100.0%
PM 88.6% 1.3% 3.1% 7.0% 100.0%
2. I-15 Northbound,
Between I-15 NB Off-Ramp and I-15 NB On-Ramp
AM 94.7% 0.8% 1.3% 3.2% 100.0%
PM 88.1% 1.3% 3.2% 7.4% 100.0%
3. I-15 Northbound,
North of I-15 Northbound On-Ramp
AM 95.1% 0.7% 1.2% 3.0% 100.0%
PM 88.8% 1.3% 3.1% 6.8% 100.0%
4. I-15 Southbound,
North of I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp
AM 86.2% 2.1% 3.4% 8.3% 100.0%
PM 94.3% 0.6% 1.6% 3.5% 100.0%
5. I-15 Southbound,
Between I-15 SB Off-Ramp and I-15 SB On-Ramp
AM 85.3% 2.2% 3.6% 8.9% 100.0%
PM 93.8% 0.7% 1.7% 3.8% 100.0%
6. I-15 Southbound,
South of I-15 Southbound On-Ramp
AM 86.3% 2.0% 3.4% 8.3% 100.0%
PM 94.0% 0.7% 1.6% 3.7% 100.0%
I-15 Ramp Segments3
1. I-15 Northbound Off-Ramp to Lake Street AM 94.2% 2.2% 0.5% 3.1% 100.0%
PM 94.7% 1.3% 0.0% 4.0% 100.0%
2. I-15 Northbound On-Ramp from Lake Street AM 97.8% 0.9% 0.0% 1.3% 100.0%
PM 96.0% 1.9% 0.0% 2.1% 100.0%
3. I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp to Lake Street AM 88.1% 5.2% 0.5% 6.2% 100.0%
PM 98.9% 0.8% 0.1% 0.2% 100.0%
4. I-15 Southbound On-Ramp from Lake Street AM 95.0% 1.5% 1.2% 2.3% 100.0%
PM 95.8% 2.1% 0.0% 2.1% 100.0%
Temescal Canyon Road Segments3
1. Temescal Canyon Road, north of Lincoln Avenue AM 97.5% 1.1% 0.3% 1.1% 100.0%
PM 98.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 100.0%
2. Temescal Canyon Road, between Lincoln Avenue
and Lake Street
AM 97.5% 1.1% 0.3% 1.1% 100.0%
PM 98.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 100.0%
1 Appendix A contains the existing turning movement count worksheets.
2 Source: City of Lake Elsinore Transportation and Analysis Model (LETAM) data provided by LSA Associates, Inc. 3 Source: Existing turning movement counts conducted by Counts Unlimited on Tuesday, December 13, 2016.
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
EXISTING VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION SPLIT SUMMARY4
Key Intersection
Time
Period
(1)
Vehicle Classification Split
Existing Traffic Conditions
Passenger
Vehicles
Large 2 Axle
Vehicles
3 Axle
Vehicles
4 Axle
Vehicles Total
Lake Street Segments5
1. Lake Street, south of Temescal Canyon Road AM 96.2% 1.1% 0.3% 2.4% 100.0%
PM 97.4% 1.4% 0.1% 1.1% 100.0%
2. Lake Street, between Temescal Canyon Road
and I-15 SB Ramps
AM 97.9% 0.6% 0.2% 1.3% 100.0%
PM 97.2% 1.2% 0.4% 1.2% 100.0%
3. Lake Street, between I-15 SB Ramps
and I-15 NB Ramps
AM 96.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.9% 100.0%
PM 96.6% 0.9% 0.5% 2.0% 100.0%
4. Lake Street, north of I-15 Northbound Ramps AM 88.9% 5.6% 0.0% 5.5% 100.0%
PM 92.9% 0.00% 7.1% 0.00% 100.0%
4 Appendix A contains the existing turning movement count worksheets.
5 Source: Existing turning movement counts conducted by Counts Unlimited on Tuesday, December 13, 2016.
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
TABLE 2
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR ROADWAY SEGMENTS (V/C METHODOLOGY)6
at average travel speeds, usually about 90% of the free
flow speed for the arterial class. Vehicles are completely
unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic
stream. Stopped delay at signalized intersections is
minimal.
B 0.601 – 0.700
VERY GOOD. Represents reasonably unimpeded
operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70% of
the free flow speed for the arterial class. The ability to
maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly
restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers
are not generally subjected to appreciable tension.
C 0.701 – 0.800
GOOD. Represents stable conditions; however, ability to
maneuver and change lanes in mid-block location may be
more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues and/or
adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower
average travel speeds of about 50% of the average free
flow speed for the arterial class. Motorists will experience
appreciable tension while driving.
D 0.801 – 0.900
FAIR. Borders on a range in which small increases in
flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay
and, hence, decreases in arterial speed. This may be due to
adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing,
high volumes, or some combination of these. Average
travel speeds are about 40% of free flow speed.
E 0.901 – 1.000
POOR. Characterized by significant approach delays and
average travel speeds of one-third the free flow speed or
lower. Such operations are caused by some combination
of adverse progression, high signal density, extensive
queuing at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal
timing.
F > 1.000
FAILURE. Characterizes arterial flow at extremely low
speeds below one-third to one-quarter of the free flow
speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical
signalized locations, with resultant high approach delays.
Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this
condition.
6 Source: Transportation Research Board 2000.
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
TABLE 3
DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITIES7
Type of Arterial Lane Configuration LOS E Capacity (VPD)
Urban Arterial 8-Lanes 71,800
Urban Arterial 6-Lanes 53,900
Major 4-Lanes 34,100
Secondary 4-Lanes 25,900
Divided Collector 4-Lanes 18,000
Collector 2-Lanes 13,000
Notes:
VPD = Vehicles per Day
7 Source: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR – Section 3.4: Transportation and Circulation, August 2011.
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
TABLE 4
YEAR 2021 CONDITIONS DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY
(1) (2) (3)
Key Roadway Segment
Year 2021
(No Build)
Traffic Conditions
Year 2021
(Build)
Traffic Conditions
Adverse
Condition
Type of
Arterial
LOS E
Capacity8
(VPD) Lanes
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
Type of
Arterial
LOS E
Capacity8
(VPD) Lanes
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
V/C
Inc.
Yes/
No
1. Temescal Canyon Road,
west of Lake Street (Bridge Portion) Collector 13,000 2U 10,380 0.798 C Major 34,100 4D9 10,380 0.304 A 0.000 No
2. Temescal Canyon Road,
west of Lake Street (Adjoining Roadway) Collector 13,000 2U 10,380 0.798 C Collector 13,000 2U 10,380 0.798 C 0.000 No
Notes:
VPD = Vehicles Per Day
D = Divided; U = Undivided
V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio
LOS = Level of Service, please refer to Table 2 for the LOS definitions
Bold “V/C”/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the LOS standards mentioned in this report
8 Source: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR (August 2011). 9 Transition lanes will be constructed on either side of the bridge along the adjoining roadway in order to allow vehicles to appropriately utilize the four lanes on the bridge.
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 - Revised Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore 05-05-17.doc
TABLE 5
YEAR 2040 CONDITIONS DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY
(1) (2) (3)
Key Roadway Segment
Year 2040
(No Build)
Traffic Conditions
Year 2040
(Build)
Traffic Conditions
Adverse
Condition
Type of
Arterial
LOS E
Capacity10
(VPD) Lanes
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
Type of
Arterial
LOS E
Capacity10
(VPD) Lanes
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
V/C
Inc.
Yes/
No
1. Temescal Canyon Road,
west of Lake Street (Bridge Portion) Collector 13,000 2U 28,600 2.200 F Major 34,100 4D 48,400 1.419 F -0.781 Yes
2. Temescal Canyon Road,
west of Lake Street (Adjoining Roadway) Collector 13,000 2U 28,600 2.200 F Major 34,100 4D 38,500 1.129 F -1.071 Yes
Notes:
VPD = Vehicles Per Day
D = Divided; U = Undivided
V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio
LOS = Level of Service, please refer to Table 2 for the LOS definitions
Bold “V/C”/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on the LOS standards mentioned in this report
10 Source: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Draft Program EIR (August 2011).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3782-1 Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 Dividers.doc
APPENDIX A
EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX A-I
INTERSECTION #1
A-1
File Name : LKELA15NAMSite Code : 05716680Start Date : 12/13/2016Page No : 1
City of Lake ElsinoreN/S: Lake StreetE/W: I-15 Northbound RampsWeather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle TrucksLake StreetSouthbound
I-15 Northbound Off RampWestbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
I-15 Northbound On RampEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total07:00 AM 0 0 1 1 41 1 1 43 204 1 0 205 0 0 0 0 24907:15 AM 0 2 0 2 71 0 4 75 146 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 22307:30 AM 0 1 1 2 66 1 2 69 124 1 0 125 0 0 0 0 19607:45 AM 0 2 0 2 32 4 1 37 156 1 0 157 0 0 0 0 196
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3700\2163782 - Temescal Canyon Wash Bridge Project, Lake Elsinore\Report\3782 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX A-III
INTERSECTION #3
A-43
File Name : LKELATEAMSite Code : 05716680Start Date : 12/13/2016Page No : 1
City of Lake ElsinoreN/S: Lake StreetE/W: Temescal Canyon RoadWeather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle TrucksLake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total07:00 AM 47 39 86 8 195 203 96 9 105 39407:15 AM 48 56 104 14 152 166 62 10 72 34207:30 AM 49 70 119 19 126 145 35 18 53 31707:45 AM 53 33 86 17 163 180 48 22 70 336
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume 197 198 395 58 636 694 241 59 300% App. Total 49.9 50.1 8.4 91.6 80.3 19.7
PHF .929 .707 .830 .763 .815 .855 .628 .670 .714
Counts UnlimitedPO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878(951) 268-6268
A-45
File Name : LKELATEAMSite Code : 05716680Start Date : 12/13/2016Page No : 1
City of Lake ElsinoreN/S: Lake StreetE/W: Temescal Canyon RoadWeather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger VehiclesLake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total07:00 AM 42 38 80 7 191 198 95 9 104 38207:15 AM 43 54 97 13 151 164 60 9 69 33007:30 AM 42 69 111 19 122 141 34 17 51 30307:45 AM 51 32 83 17 159 176 47 22 69 328
Grand Total 327 261 588 96 1107 1203 353 85 438 2229Apprch % 55.6 44.4 8 92 80.6 19.4
Total % 14.7 11.7 26.4 4.3 49.7 54 15.8 3.8 19.7
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume 178 193 371 56 623 679 236 57 293% App. Total 48 52 8.2 91.8 80.5 19.5
PHF .873 .699 .836 .737 .815 .857 .621 .648 .704
Counts UnlimitedPO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878(951) 268-6268
A-47
File Name : LKELATEAMSite Code : 05716680Start Date : 12/13/2016Page No : 1
City of Lake ElsinoreN/S: Lake StreetE/W: Temescal Canyon RoadWeather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle VehiclesLake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total07:00 AM 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 407:15 AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 3 507:30 AM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 407:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume 6 0 6 1 1 2 3 2 5% App. Total 100 0 50 50 60 40
PHF .500 .000 .500 .250 .250 .250 .375 .500 .417
Counts UnlimitedPO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878(951) 268-6268
A-49
File Name : LKELATEAMSite Code : 05716680Start Date : 12/13/2016Page No : 1
City of Lake ElsinoreN/S: Lake StreetE/W: Temescal Canyon RoadWeather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle VehiclesLake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total07:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 107:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 007:30 AM 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 207:45 AM 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
Grand Total 10 3 13 0 7 7 1 0 1 21Apprch % 76.9 23.1 0 100 100 0
Total % 47.6 14.3 61.9 0 33.3 33.3 4.8 0 4.8
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume 1 2 3 0 2 2 0 0 0% App. Total 33.3 66.7 0 100 0 0
PHF .250 .500 .750 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000
Counts UnlimitedPO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878(951) 268-6268
A-51
File Name : LKELATEAMSite Code : 05716680Start Date : 12/13/2016Page No : 1
City of Lake ElsinoreN/S: Lake StreetE/W: Temescal Canyon RoadWeather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle TrucksLake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total07:00 AM 4 0 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 707:15 AM 3 2 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 707:30 AM 4 0 4 0 3 3 1 0 1 807:45 AM 1 1 2 0 3 3 1 0 1 6
Grand Total 25 5 30 2 21 23 4 0 4 57Apprch % 83.3 16.7 8.7 91.3 100 0
Total % 43.9 8.8 52.6 3.5 36.8 40.4 7 0 7
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Grand Total 1387 262 1649 115 548 663 235 122 357 2669Apprch % 84.1 15.9 17.3 82.7 65.8 34.2
Total % 52 9.8 61.8 4.3 20.5 24.8 8.8 4.6 13.4
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Grand Total 20 1 21 2 15 17 5 0 5 43Apprch % 95.2 4.8 11.8 88.2 100 0
Total % 46.5 2.3 48.8 4.7 34.9 39.5 11.6 0 11.6
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Grand Total 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Apprch % 100 0 0 0 0 0
Total % 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
Grand Total 10 1 11 1 15 16 1 0 1 28Apprch % 90.9 9.1 6.2 93.8 100 0
Total % 35.7 3.6 39.3 3.6 53.6 57.1 3.6 0 3.6
Lake StreetSouthbound
Lake StreetNorthbound
Temescal Canyon RoadEastbound
Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM