Top Banner
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie March 25, 2022 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen van der Laan Faculty of Civil Engineering Msc. Water Management Specilization Drinking Water
31

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

April 18, 2023

1

Modeling subsurface iron removalGeochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk

Harmen van der Laan

Faculty of Civil EngineeringMsc. Water ManagementSpecilization Drinking Water

Page 2: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 2

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 3: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 3

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 4: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 4

Subsurface iron removal

O2

front

0

1

inje

cted

wat

er

O2

fro

nt

injected

water

Fe2+

front 0

1

Fe2+

front

Fe2+

front

0

1

0

1

Fe2+

front

inje

cted

wat

er

Injection Extraction

Page 5: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Measured data

5April 18, 2023

Page 6: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 6

Measured data

Development final iron concentration

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

injection - extraction cycles

Fe (

mg/

L)

July 1998 – June 2000 March 2004 – June 2005

Page 7: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

‘Original’ Model

7April 18, 2023

V/Vi

Page 8: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Expanded model

8April 18, 2023

main limitation original model

No explanation for the phenomena of the increasing spread of the (iron) front over the successive cycles

Page 9: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 9

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 10: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Objective

The objective of this research project is to• Find a theoretical foundation to explain the

development of the iron front over the successive cycles

• Enhance the existing model to obtain a proper description of the measured iron concentrations

10April 18, 2023

Page 11: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 11

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 12: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 12

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Page 13: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 13

Goethite vs. Ferrihydrite

FerrihydriteHfo, FeOH3, Fe5HO8·4H2O

Unstable, unstructured Amorphous / Aquaeous Spec. area ≈ 600 m2/g 2 sites / nm2 pHPZC 8.1 Solubility log K = 2 –

4.5

Observed by: KIWA Research

Goethiteα-FeOOH

Stable Crystalline Spec. area ≈ 60 m2/g 2 - 10 sites / nm2 pHPZC 8.7 Solubility log K = -1

Observed by: Mettler (2002)

Page 14: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 14

Surface complexation theory

OHOH

OHOH

OH + / - depends

on pH

Number of sites

Surface area

Fe2

+

Fe2

+

Fe2

+

Page 15: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 15

Site density

Page 16: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 16

Surface characterization

Page 17: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 17

Goethite vs. Ferrihydrite ?

• Variations in site density and surface area only result in small bandwidth

• Differences between Goethite and Ferrihydrite not the main limitation

α-FeOOH

Ferrihydrite

‘solubility’ decreases in time

Page 18: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 18

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Page 19: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Exchange

April 18, 2023 19

Page 20: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Exchange

April 18, 2023 20

Exchange and adsorption hard to distinguish

Exchange capacity = lumped parameter

Empirical formula

does not give correct output

CEC (meq/kg) = 7 · (% clay) + 35 · (% C)

Page 21: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 21

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Page 22: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 22

Retardation / Front spreading

Page 23: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 23

Microdispersion Macrodispersivity

Injection well

Page 24: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 24

Dispersion

Page 25: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Stagnant zones

April 18, 2023 25

Page 26: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Stagnant zones

April 18, 2023 26

Page 27: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 27

Results

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Preliminary Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 28: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

Preliminary Conclusions

Objective is: Theoretical foundation and a better model

I. Many ‘flavors’, but I need too pick oneII. Model starts to describe the correct retardation

mainly because of dispersion / stagnant zones

April 18, 2023 28

Page 29: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 29

Possible explanation

Ferric

iron

I. Kinetics: decrease SI in time / combination Ferrihydrite – Goethite

II. Stagnant zones III. Or:

Biological activity?Complexes? Change groundwater composition?

Page 30: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 30

Next steps & Recommendations

Next steps Tracer in groundwater for dispersion? Implementation stagnant zones Influence conclusions on accumulation Finish model

Recommendations Column experiments:

separate transport model from geochemistry Research Ferrihydrite / Goethite

Page 31: Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 17, 2015 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen.

April 18, 2023 31

Questions?