LEI-03 Technical Document Verifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System VERIFIER TOOLBOX and VERIFICATION for ASSESSMENT INDICATORS in Sustainable Plantation Forest Management Certification System 1. Introduction LEI-03 Technical Document is a further explanation of the Sustainable Plantation Forest Management (PHTL) System criteria and indicators stated in LEI 5000-2 Standards. Field Assessors may use this document as reference in verifying field data. 2. Scope This document explains the definition, verifiers, data sources and verification methods for each Sustainable Plantation Forest Management (PHTL) System certification assessment indicators on production, ecology and social aspects. 3. Reference a) LEI 5000 Standard, Sustainable Production Forest Management (PHPL) System Frame b) LEI 5000-2 Standard, Sustainable Plant Forest Management (PHTL) System
42
Embed
VERIFIER TOOLBOX and VERIFICATION for ASSESSMENT INDICATORS
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
11.. IInnttrroodduuccttiioonnLEI-03 Technical Document is a further explanation of the Sustainable Plantation ForestManagement (PHTL) System criteria and indicators stated in LEI 5000-2 Standards. FieldAssessors may use this document as reference in verifying field data.
22.. SSccooppeeThis document explains the definition, verifiers, data sources and verification methods for eachSustainable Plantation Forest Management (PHTL) System certification assessment indicators onproduction, ecology and social aspects.
33.. RReeffeerreenncceea) LEI 5000 Standard, Sustainable Production Forest Management (PHPL) System Frameb) LEI 5000-2 Standard, Sustainable Plant Forest Management (PHTL) System
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
--- 1. Compare forecast and realization of assetprocurement until today (the last 3 years).
2. Compare forecast and realization of annual profit
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
profitability/corporate
soundness.
that comes from utilized forest products. Without
being able to reach MARR, the effects of highcost and/or low revenue will bring in potentialexcess felling or digression from production
sustainability regulations. Nevertheless, corporatesoundness will depend on its daily condition.
liquidity). every three year
audited by publicaccountant.
3. Forest utilizationfinancial reporting
guide.
4. Periodical financial
documents or reports.
until today (the last 3 years).
3. Compare forecast and realization of annualbusiness profitability until today (the last 3 years).
4. Valuing annual profitability and compare it with its
average capital interest.
5. Valuing annual solvability.
6. Field check on investment or reinvestmentprojects to check its similarity with reports from the
public accountant.
P3.5
Plantation forest researchutilization and
development.
Every management activity aspect, especially
treatment on silviculture to increase forestsustainable productivity, improvement of productquality and performance must utilize research and
development resulted from the R&D division orother R&D institutions.
1. Programs analyzed and
developed.
2. Research results
implementation.
3. SOP set based on R&D
results.
1. R&D observation
data.
2. R&D result report.
3. Other related reports.
Field observation on
R&D facilities andresults.
1. Purposive observation on field, laboratory, etc.
2. Value the comparison of the program and itsresults.
P3.6
Establishment of businesspartnership with the local
community.
Business partnership establishment with the local
community confirms that the management unit iswelcomed in the region. The development ofpublic forest and community forest cultivation till
alter the attention and dependency of the localcommunity for the plantation forest land; theyeven can be partners in managing the forest.
Moreover, forest product utilization managementmust be capable in accommodating the interest of
the local community who is dependent to theforest.
1. Business formation and
partnership relation pattern.
2. Public forest and community
forest assistance perpopulation unit.
3. The development of publicforest and community forestassistance implementation
until this day.
4. Monitoring, organizing, and
SOP.
1. Forest village
communityassistance documentplan.
2. Forest villagecommunity
assistance reportuntil this day.
3. Partnershipagreement.
Interview with officers
and partners.
1. Interview with officers, community, and business
partners.
2. Appraise the proportion of public forest and
community forest per population unit.
3. Calculate the percentage of the realization for
public forest and community forest implementationuntil today.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P3.7
Forest stumpage asset
enhancement.
The increasing forest stumpage/stand asset andconsidered as capital that must not depreciate is
an effort on business improvement andreinvestment that performs long-term costing.
1. Capitalization, realization,and fund allocation for forest
development prepared forcutting and put on themarket.
2. Forest value estimation from
time to time.
1. Annual forestutilization financial
report.
2. Management unit
activity and budgetingplan.
3. Periodical inventoryreport.
Interview with financialdivision and field
investigation.
1. Realization and fund allocation for plantation forestdevelopment prepared for sale can be identified
from the financial report; the result of the valuationof labor physical quality derived from the technicaloperational standard; and fair value of fixed asset.
2. Valuation on the increase of capital in the form of
1. Interview with the management unit and community
within the forest area.
2. Analyses of documents and literature study.
3. Field check to verify the existence of the protected
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
conservation area, to its
ideal breadth.
and the sustainability of the water management
within the plantation forest management.
water spring boundary, protected
forest and conservation forestbuffer-zone, and areas with>2000m above sea level that has
been approved and acknowledgedby related parties to its ideal
breadth.
(RKPHT)/Annual
Work Plan (RKT).
2. Provincial/Regional
Spatial/Land UsePlan.
3. Appointment andBorder Management
Report.
4. Interpretation map of
aerial photograph/landsat image.
5. Plantation forestfeasibility study.
6. EnvironmentalImpact Assessment
document.
7. Other related
literature/information.
8. Related report
analysis.
protected region. area and well running.
E1.2
The planning of effectiveproduction area structuring
based on theappropriateness andcapability of land and its
water functioncontinuance.
The effective production area is a land within the
plantation forest area that can be effectivelyplanted with selected plants based on ecologicalfeasibility and corresponds with corporate goals.
To make sure that the productivity of the selectedplant is guaranteed in a long period, the effective
production area must be managed based on theland compatibility and capability and the
1. Ratio of the size of
production area on the totalsize of the area.
2. Ratio of the size of theconservation area on thetotal size of the area.
1. Design map of the
plantation areaapproved byDirectorate General
of ForestryProduction
Management.
2. Topography map,
1. Aerial photograph
analysis.
2. Field check on
planting groundpartitioning basedon land
compatibility andcapability, and the
Sample test on the borders of the effective production
area organized into plant areas based on the Topographymap, land coverage map, and land slope.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
sustainability of the water management function. land coverage map,
and land slope.
3. Land support map
(slope x type x class).
4. Area structure design
guide.
sustainability of
watermanagementfunction.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.3
The percentage or ratio of
the actual boundaries of aconservation area andeffective production area
(appropriateness andcapability of land and itswater function
continuance) to its idealboundaries.
Border management or border sign is one of the
indicators to show that an arrangement has beendone. Arrangements based on the ideal ratio of
the conservation and production forest on theactual border sign will guarantee the sustainabilityof land and water function.
1. Percentage or ratio of the
actual border managementof the conservation forest on
the ideal bordermanagement of theconservation forest.
2. Percentage or ratio of theactual border arrangement
of the production area (landcompatibility and capability)on the ideal border
arrangement.
1. Provincial/Regional
Land Use Plans.
2. Plantation forest
feasibility study.
3. Border Management
report.
4. Environmental impact
report.
5. Other related reportsand literature.
Direct field check. Monitoring and interviewing directly in the field and
compare and analyze using collected data or reports, sothat the conservation forest can run well.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E1.4
The percentage or ratio ofthe boundaries of a well
running conservation areato its ideal boundaries.
The stated conservation area will not be noticed if
there are no clear guideposts on the borders. Theposts will clearly state the border between theconservation area (height, slope steepness, and
peat density) with the production/felling area andother areas. These guideposts will not indicateanything unless maintained properly.
1. The existence of the
guideposts and informationboards that are wellfunctioning and maintained,
and also the existence of
2. The functioning of security
patrol.
3. Standard operating
procedure of forest securityprotection.
1. Regional security and
protectionimplementationdocument.
2. SOP document.
Direct field check. 1. Interview with field personnel and other related
group around the management unit.
2. Monitoring the condition of guideposts and
inspection lane using sampling test with samplinglevel of intensity.
3. Forest security (patrol) monitoring by fieldpersonnel.
E1.5
The planning and
implementation ofsilviculture system that can
control erosion in the cutup or production area.
Erosion caused by silviculture practices such asduring felling period or land clearing can be
controlled by repairing land coverings as soon aspossible through planting and mulching, andminimizing the usage of heavy equipment that
might increase soil density, which burdens landquality (soil physics and chemistry) and watermanagement.
1. The SOP of felling design.
2. The SOP of land clearing
design.
3. Prove or records of planting
activities in open areas tocontrol erosion (for example:
effort not to clear areas with
a slope level of > 45° or
covering/planting open
felling remains areas of >
45°).
1. Felling andproduction reports.
2. Other related writtenreports.
3. Reports on the sizeof open area caused
by land clearing andfelling.
4. Types of the utilizedland covering.
5. Records of efforts onerosion control other
than planting (forexample: terasering).
Direct field monitoring. 1. Read and translate obtained reports.
2. Directly monitors signs of felling practices in the
field that has minimum effects.
3. Interviews with field personnel/employees.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.6
Change in soil fertility
(physical and chemical),including the production
waste contamination.
Production activities that involves landpreparation to plantation, maintenance and
harvesting, significantly influence soil fertilitylevel, in terms of soil chemical and physicalelements. Soil fertility can be disrupted by the
abundance of chemistry/organic substancescaused by over-fertilization or contamination inthe production process such as mycorhizza fungi
contamination that affects land fertility. Change infertility level will tend to decrease if the
management unit does not maintain land fertility,stated in the nutrient budget, soil compaction, andthe top soil and type of plant.
1. Site matching or provenancetrial.
2. Implementation ofappropriate cultivation
technology.
3. The utilization of ameliorant
element such as inorganic(urea, KCL), organic, andbiologic fertilizer
(mycorhizza).
4. The existence of dried
leaves (forest litter) andcover-crops within the
plantation/production area.
5. Periodical reports (soil and
plant tests).
6. Top-soil existence,
abundance and thickness.
7. Soil compaction existence
and abundance within theplantation/production area.
1. Five-year Work Plandocument.
2. Nursery (seeding),planting, and plant
maintenance reports.
3. Fertilizing report.
4. Soil survey report(lab analyses).
5. Other related
research results.
6. Data/records on the
utilization of heavyequipments ormechanical
machines.
1. Direct fieldchecking and
monitoring.
2. Direct field/lab soil
test and itsinterpretation.
1. Direct interview with field personnel.
2. Compare implementation reports with the
realization.
3. Monitors traces of amelioration.
4. Monitors the firmness of top soil and dried leaves
(forest litter ), and soil compaction.
5. Collect soil sample, analyze in the laboratory and
periodically interpret the result.
E1.7
The percentage of change
of land erosion on theproduction area.
The loss of top soil more than the tolerable soil
loss level shows that the plantation forestmanagement disregards soil conservationaspects. The effect of plantation forest toward soil
1. The emergence of a darkcolored top soil at the
planting area in theplantation forest.
1. Document on theanalysis of
environmentalimpact.
Field measurementresults.
The erosion measurement that can be performed ismonitoring the thickness of horizon A, sedimentation, and
water quality parameter, using laboratory analyses, ifnecessary.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
other than accelerated erosion is the decrease in
soil physical character, such as compaction,caused by incorrect land clearing method. Then itis the increase of surface run-off, cause by soil
compaction that can cause change in river flowdebit.
2. Form/types of erosion. 2. Results of
environmentmanagement and
monitoring from theenvironment division.
3. SPAS evaluationresult.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.8
The percentage of change
or disappearance ofvegetation structure and
species in the conservationarea.
The vegetation structure in the conservation areais closely related to the interseption of rainfall
(stem-flow and throughfall) and into the soil.
This relates to the erosion control and water
management around water bodies. Therefore, ifthe vegetation structure around the water body
cannot support rainfall interseption, erosion levelwill increase in the area and disrupt the functionsof the water bodies. Besides as wildlife’s habitat
and corridor, and source of genes, secure placefor plant community and types, the conservationforest must also be the center of attention in
activities in natural environment resourcesprotection and maintenance by the plantation
forest management unit.
1. Change in vegetationstructure.
2. Decrease in the quantity ofplant type.
1. EnvironmentalImpact Analyses
document.
2. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) andEnvironmental
Monitoring Plan(RPL).
3. Vegetation coveragemap.
4. Aerial photo/landsatimage interpretation
map.
5. Other related reports.
Field monitoring on plantstructure and species in
water bodies.
1. Analyses of related documents and maps.
2. Interview with the management unit and related
parties.
3. Field monitoring on plant structure and quantityusing purposive sampling in the protected forestarea.
(constant water supply)and quality change(chemical, solid, and
suspension) in waterbodies to the existingstandard measurement
caused by managementunit’s activity.
Water condition of the water body especially inrivers can be described as good if it flows at alltime, without any significant difference in peak
debit (during wet season) and in minimum debit(during dry season), and the water quality is in a
good condition according to its natural state.
Reduction in water quality particularly drastic
concentration until below the authorized waterquality standard shows a forest management thatdoes not pay attention to the environment. The
reduction is caused by accelerated erosion andhigh surface run-off.
1. Maximum debit (wet season)and minimum debit (dryseason).
2. Content of solids
suspensioned and dissolvedin water (river).
1. SPAS data.
2. Environmental
management andmonitoring report.
3. Other related writteninformation.
1. Direct fieldmeasurement.
2. Interview withlocal community.
1. Read and interpret SPAS data and other reports.
2. Interview with local community in the downstream
area of the plantation forest on water managementcondition in the dry and wet season.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.10
Land utilization
pattern/systemimplementation in plantingactivities and plant forest
stumpage maintenance,which may influence landquality and water course
function.
Land quality condition and water management
function sustainability is influenced by landutilization system/pattern using suitable plant type
and considers the condition of the localenvironment, biophysical and social culturalelements of the community.
1. The existence of land
utilization systemimplemented by the
community that proves toinfluence the condition ofland quality in the production
area.
2. Plantation forest stands
improvement proven toaffect land quality by thecommunity in the production
area.
1. Diagnostic study
report.
2. Annual Work Plan or
mid-term planningdocument.
EnvironmentalImpact Analysesdocument.
3. Forest supportactivity report.
Interview with related
stakeholders andsampling test on land
utilization systemimplementation.
1. Interview with the management unit, local
community, and other stakeholders.
2. Field monitoring on the implementation of land
utilization system.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E1.11
Protection of land fromerosion and land and water
contamination (the usageof pesticide, herbicide, andenvironmental-friendly
fertilizer).
Intensity of impact control on soil shows the
persistence of the plantation forest managementin avoiding impact of the plantation forestutilization on environmental physical components.
Impact control on soil can be shown in soilconservation activities.
1. The existence of soil and
water conservation activities(guludan, mulch), particularlycover-crop in high-erosion-
potential regions (beyonderosion levels.
2. Land rehabilitation activitiesin open areas and not
utilized.
3. Monitoring activities in land
and water qualitymanagement.
4. Soil test.
5. Types of pesticides used
and its active form ofchemical composition.
1. Results from the
environment impactanalyses.
2. Result ofenvironmentmonitoring from the
environmentaldivision.
3. SPAS evaluationresult (if any).
Results from the field
measurement towardsthe verifiers.
1. Monitoring of erosion indications in open areas and
measure sedimentation level in waters during wetseason.
2. Monitoring/measuring can only be performed ofefforts in managing impacts of erosion andsedimentation are implemented.
3. Buildings and constructions monitoring, and soil
conservation treatment, which must be donealthough performed at the simplest form.
4. Soil sample collecting from the field, which is done
to acknowledge the content ofpesticides/herbicides in the soil.
INDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER DATA & INFORMATION METHOD OF
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
SECONDARY PRIMARY VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.12
Activities in maintenanceand rehabilitation of foresttype structure and
composition (vegetation) ofconservation area.
The sustainability of the function of conservationregion within a plantation forest management unit
can be maintained if the vegetation structure inthe region is well taken care of. Therefore, the
water management function will also run well.Further, in vegetation structure rehabilitation andmaintenance, screening of plant types needs
attention to ensure long-term land and watermanagement function.
1. Type structure andcomposition existing in the
conservation area.
2. Documents related to efforts
of rehabilitation andmaintenance of vegetation
structure.
1. Forest training report.
2. Vegetation coveragemap.
3. Latest aerialphoto/landsat image
map.
4. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
5. Report on theimplementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) and
EnvironmentalMonitoring Plan(RPL).
6. Documents onfeasibility study and
Engineering Design.
Interview with themanagement unit and
field monitoring.
1. Interview with the management unit.
2. Map analyses.
3. Field monitoring using purposive sampling with
random start method with specified intensity inproportion to the field condition.
E1.13
Waste handling system topreserve land quality and
watercourse functionsustainability.
Water bodies is a river mouth for waste (organic
and inorganic) produced by all activities in theplantation forest management unit. Most wasteare non-biodegradable (plastic, tin can, etc.) and
requires special treatment to avoid contaminationto the environment. The location of the waste
1. The waste form produced by
activities in the plantationforest management unit.
2. Waste handling.
3. Standard operating
procedure of waste handling
1. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
2. Report on theimplementation ofEnvironmental
Direct field monitoring. 1. Observation in the location of waste production and
disposal.
2. Water sample collection in water bodies.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
treatment facility determines the possibilities/
consequences towards the sustainability of landquality and water function. If the location andtreatment are not accurately determined, the
sustainability of water function in the water bodiesmay possibly be disrupted.
including location accuracy. Management Plan
(RKL) andEnvironmentalMonitoring Plan
(RPL).
E1.14
Usage of chemical
elements that maycontaminate water.
The utilization of chemical elements in themanagement unit can potentially contaminatewater bodies. Therefore, it must be carefully
managed.
1. The utilization of chemicalelements in unit activity.
2. The existence of chemicalcontent found in water
bodies.
1. EnvironmentalImpact Analysesdocument.
2. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmentalManagement Plan
(RKL) andEnvironmentalMonitoring Plan
(RPL).
Direct field monitoring. 1. Observation in the location of waste production anddisposal.
2. Water sample collection in water bodies.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.15 In increasing community welfare, a vast 1. The availability of annual 1. Report on diagnostic 1. Interview with the 1. Interview with the unit management, local
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
Active community
involvement in theenvironmental-friendly land
utilization pattern system.
opportunity is made available in the management
unit area. They are opportunities to use soil andland as extensive as possible as long as it doesnot disrupt the main plants and can increase its
quality.
plants (varieties for
tumpang sari/heteroculture)that can be utilized by thecommunity in the plantation
forest area.
2. The level of knowledge of
the community regarding thevarious land utilization
system.
results.
2. Forest support report.
3. Reports oncommunity support
surrounding theplantation forest.
4. Environmental
AssessmentAnalyses document.
unit management
and localcommunity.
2. Field monitoring.
community, and related parties.
2. Field monitoring on tumpang sari/heteroculturesystem and its achievements.
resources and utilized bythe community) to the idealbreadth of the conservation
area.
Protected areas based on the sustainability ofgene resources, unique and/or endangered
flora/fauna habitation, wildlife corridor, bufferzone, and well-managed forest resources and itsrecognition by stakeholders and the fulfillment in
meeting field biophysical considerations willguarantee the preservation of natural diversity.
The percentage of the actualbreadth of the conservation area
with its gene resources, unique/endangered flora/fauna habitat,wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and
life plants that can be utilized bythe community and have therecognition of related parties, to its
ideal breadth.
1. Long-term PlantationForest Management
Plan(RKPHT)/AnnualWork Plan (RKT).
2. Provincial/RegionalSpatial/Land Use
Plans.
3. Report on Border
Recognition andManagement.
4. Aerial photo/landsatimage interpretation
map.
5. Plantation forest
feasibility study.
6. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
1. Aerial photoanalysis.
2. Results of directfield investigation
on the statedprotected region.
1. Interview with the unit management and communitysurrounding the forest.
2. Document analysis and literature study.
3. Field investigation to prove the existence of the
protected area and is well-managed.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
7. Other related
literature andinformation.
8. Related reportanalysis.
E2.2
The area structuring of
management unit based onthe importance of
flora/fauna conservation,plant forest stumpageprotection, and forest
resources that is veryuseful for the local
community.
The arrangement of the management unitworking area that considers the interest of
flora/fauna conservation, plantation forest standsand resources that is useful to the localcommunity will guarantee the preservation of the
natural diversity besides maintaining the stabilityof the ecosystem of plantation forest stands in thelong run.
1. The function-based areadesign.
2. The proportion of themanagement unit area
design performed by the unitto its ideal standard.
3. The implementation of thearea design presented in a
good and accurate map(area design report) orinformation system.
1. Work map.
2. Aerial photo/landsat
image interpretationresult.
3. Feasibility study andEngineering Design
documents.
4. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
5. Long-term PlantationForest Management
Plan(RKPHT)/AnnualWork Plan (RKT).
6. Other relatedliterature and
information.
1. Reports on relateddocument
analyses.
2. Interview with
related parties.
1. Analyses on related documents.
2. Map analyses, such as land covering, soil,
topography, and other related maps.
3. Interviews with related parties.
4. Direct field monitoring of areas stated by the unit,
especially conservation areas.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E2.3
The percentage of the
actual breadth ofconservation area (generesources, exotic and/or
endangered flora/faunahabitat, wildlife corridor,buffer zone, and life plant
area utilized by thecommunity) that is well
structured to the idealbreadth of the conservationarea.
The conservation area (gene resources,
unique/endemic and/or endangered flora/faunahabitation, wildlife corridor, buffer zone) that are
well structured and clearly mapped, whichexistence can be easily monitored and evaluatedin relation to the process of the system within the
unit and the surrounding area to guarantee asustainable natural diversity.
The percentage of the actual
breadth of the conservation area ofgene resources, habitat of unique/
endangered flora/fauna, wildlifecorridor, buffer zone, and lifeplants that can be utilized by the
community and that are wellstructured and managed, to itsideal breadth.
1. Long-term Plantation
Forest ManagementPlan
(RKPHT)/AnnualWork Plan (RKT).
2. Provincial/RegionalSpatial/Land UsePlans.
3. Report on Border
Recognition andManagement.
4. Aerial photo/landsat
image interpretationmap.
5. Plantation forestfeasibility study.
6. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
7. Other related
literature andinformation.
8. Related reportanalysis.
1. Aerial photo
analysis.
2. Results of direct
field investigationon the stated
protected region.
1. Interview with the unit management and community
surrounding the forest.
2. Document analysis and literature study.
3. Field investigation to prove the existence of the
protected area and is well-managed.
E2.4
The assurance/
maintenance ofconservation area security
Border maintenance means not only maintainingguideposts and inspection route but also the
control shift of conservation area function to otherform, and reducing the size of the area that has
1. Prove of maintenance ofborder guideposts and
inspection route.
2. Change in the function of
1. Management unitadministration report,
particularly reports onforest security and
1. Documentanalyses aimed to
identify conditionand existence of
1. Interview with the unit management and communitysurrounding the forest.
2. Monitor the condition of the guideposts andinspection route using sampling test with specific
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
(gene resources, exotic
and/or endangeredflora/fauna habitat, wildlifecorridor, buffer zone, and
forest resources utilized bythe community).
no clear reasonable basis. Further, the meaning
of maintenance should include activities inevaluation and rehabilitation of conservation areacondition, to keep it well-functioning in the long
run.
conservation area to other
function.
3. Change in size of the
conservation area.
4. Evaluation and management
of the conservation.
5. Standard operation
procedure of forest securityprotection.
support.
2. EnvironmentalImpact Analyses
document.
3. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) andEnvironmental
Monitoring Plan(RPL).
the conservation
area.
2. Field monitoring
using sample teston the quality of
guideposts andinspection route.
sampling intensity level according to the length of
the observed border.
3. Monitor evaluation and rehabilitation activities in
the conservation area by the management unit.
4. Monitor unit activities in relation to community
participation in protecting and sustaining theconservation area.
E2.5
Wildlife diversity in theproduction area.
The main plant management in the plantation
forest area influence the diversity of wildlife in theregion. Based on the early condition of the wildlifehabitat, the plantation forest management can
decrease and/or increase their diversity.
Change in wildlife diversity. 1. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument
2. Documents onEnvironmental
Management/Monitoring Report.
Direct field monitoring. Field monitoring on the diversity of wildlife species using
standard method (mammals, birds and reptiles).
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E2.6 The development of the natural resource 1. Form of resource utilization 1. Report on natural Direct field monitoring. Interview with the unit management and other related
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System