Vanishing in a puff of logic Or why Library 2.0 doesn’t really exist. Nick Woolley, Information Specialist for Biomedical & Health Sciences, King’s College London.
Dec 18, 2015
Vanishing in a puffof logic Or why Library 2.0 doesn’t really exist.Nick Woolley,
Information Specialist for Biomedical & Health Sciences,
King’s College London.
2
AACR2 bibliometrics cataloguing citation
classification communication
dewey decimal labels information architecture
maps MeSH marc21
metadata ontology OPAC referencing signage subject headings
taxonomy thesaurus user guides web
ironic tag cloud #1
3
Library 2. what?
Does it actually mean something or not?
If it does, what is it?
If it doesn’t – or it’s down to the individual – then there’s not much point is there?
And don’t we (librarians and assorted information professionals) have an ongoing vested interest in choosing the right words?
4
Looking at Library 2.0
Voice of doom? Or voice of reason?
Be critical Good ideas will survive and flourish
We have NOT been critical
Reflect What do you do already?
Look for evidence Does it really exist? What do we do already?What have we done?
5
01/09/2006 Library Journal“Library 2.0 : service for the next-generation library”
“The heart of Library 2.0 is user-centered change.”
“While not required, technology can help libraries create a customer-driven, 2.0 environment.”
“.. the Library 2.0 model gives library users a participatory role in the services libraries offer and the way they are used..”
“The Library 2.0 model seeks to harness our customer's knowledge to supplement and improve library services.”
“What makes a service Library 2.0? Any service, physical or virtual, that successfully reaches users, is evaluated frequently, and makes use of customer input is a Library 2.0 service. Even older, traditional services can be Library 2.0 if criteria are met. Similarly, being new is not enough to make a service Library 2.0.http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html
6
2007 re-evaluation
“Library 2.0 is user-centric. It is a shift in our focus from having libraries decide what is best for users to letting users decide what they want, how they want to get it, and how we can best serve them.
Library 2.0 is constant change and evaluation.
Library 2.0 is not just about technology.
Library 2.0 is political.”
http://www.librarycrunch.com/2007/10/we_know_what_library_20_is_and.html
7
A synthesis
Library 2.0 is about..
..Web 2.0 / User participation / Constant change
..wisdom of crowds
..perpetual beta
..let the users decide
It is represented as a paradigm shift to the next-generation of library services
8
Library 1.0?
The Library 2.0 corollary is inescapable.
It is an implicit de facto damning critique of Library (1.0)
This critique is rarely articulated in any detail.
When it is (peripherally) mentioned no evidence is provided.
Is your Library 1.0 really so broken it needs ‘2.0’?
9
Library 1.0?“..a strict definition of Library 1.0 would be counterproductive. ..
Library 1.0 really is whatever point you are at now.
I think that what we need to remember is that Library 1.0 is a restrictive place, governed by strict hierarchies, rigid boundaries, and underpinned by change-avoidance.”
Michael Casey (2005)
http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/10/is_there_a_library_10_does_it.html
10
“Even older, traditional services can be Library 2.0 if criteria are met.”
“Your library may already offer some services that can be considered Library 2.0. If your organization combines these Library 2.0 options with a framework for continual change and customer input integrated into other operations within your library, it will be well on its way to becoming Library 2.0.”
Michael Casey (2005)http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/10/is_there_a_library_10_does_it.html
What does this mean? How exactly is this helpful? Doublespeak?
13
Sunglasses and moonlightDawkins quoting Medawar in a Nature review of Sokal and Bricmont’s “Intellectual imposters” Nature 1998 394 141-143
“I could quote evidence of the beginnings of a whispering campaign against the virtues of clarity.
A writer on structuralism in the Times Literary Supplement has suggested that thoughts which
are confused and tortuous by reason of their profundity are most appropriately expressed in
prose that is deliberately unclear. What a preposterously silly idea! I am reminded of an air-raid warden in wartime Oxford who, when bright
moonlight seemed to be defeating the spirit of the blackout, exhorted us to wear dark glasses. He,
however, was being funny on purpose.”
14
Technology and the libraryText
Sumerians 3000 BCClay tablets, papyrus, scrollsAlexandria (300 BC)Parchment, rolls, codexThe printed bookClassificationCard IndexMicroformComputersBarcodesOPACsInternet and the WWWOnline databasesDigitisation, Ejournals, EbooksRFIDWeb 2.0
htt
p:/
/ww
w.fl
ickr.
com
/ph
oto
s/b
acig
alu
pe/3
85
04
28
78
15
The adoption of new technologies to improve
the services we offer is characteristic of libraries in historic
and contemporary settings.
Web 2.0 may be another milestonealong the way. But don’t confuse a
comma for the start of a new chapter.
16
Library 2.0 does not replaceBibliographic databases OR Google Scholar
RefWorks OR Connotea
E journals, reference works ORWikipedia
Experts OR Users
IT literacy OR Digital natives
17
pre-Library 2.0 change
library card index OPAC
paper abstracts online databases
print electronic
photocopier pdf’s memory stick
personal card index ref. man. software
18
Nothing I do is Library 2.0 #1But what I do at work includes…
…promoting Web 2.0 tools like Delicious and Connotea
…creating / participating in / advising on wikis
…teaching RSS
…continual response to user feedback
…continual development of services and change
19
Nothing I do is Library 2.0 #2
But what I do (not) at work includes…
…playing on facebook
…tagging my books on LibraryThing
…contributing to Wikipedia when I can bear it
…using Bloglines to subscribe to my own increasingly bizarre Yahoo pipes mashed feeds…
20
Going to the users?h
ttp
://w
ww
.flic
kr.c
om
/ph
oto
s/p
olly
alid
a/1
71
70
77
67
4
Library 2.0 says go to the users
But we already are ‘everywhere’
And do the users want us in their space?
22
The OPAC is broken?
“I’ve visited Kings in Australia, and their library is absolutely massive. They’ve got a new computer
system, and if you’re looking for a certain book, you just type in the book, and it comes up with the code, the
floor, and where you can find it on that floor. It’s really cool.” (p.18)
JISC Student Expectations Study July 2007http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/studentexpectations
23
JISC Student Expectations Study July 2007 [Comment on Second Life] “That’s a bit weird, to be honest. You
would be quite sad to do that” (p.13)
I don’t know if I would particularly like getting texts from the university. Because your phone is your private, social thing.
(p.28)
“..they do not want technology to encroach on their learning or social experiences. (p.29)
“Fundamentally, this age group suspects that if all learning is mediated through technology, this will diminish the value of the
learning.” (p.30)
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/studentexpectations
24
Digital natives?h
ttp
://w
ww
.flic
kr.
com
/ph
oto
s/r
ich
ard
_am
/11
67
75
44
7
Want to learn from experts
Want VFM
Competitive
Busy enough
Want more ‘Library 1.0’!
25
So…
…Library 2.0 does not describe anything new
…in fact it doesn’t really exist
…this doesn’t mean we haven’t got a lot of work to do
…this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t embrace the best of Web 2.0
…let’s keep on changing, improving, and ignoring any…