Top Banner
Value Stream Mapping Webinar with APICS Heartland September 18, 2014
42
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Mapping

Webinar with APICS Heartland

September 18, 2014

Page 2: Value Stream Mapping

You will learn…

• How to use value stream mapping as an organizational transformation & leadership alignment tool

• How to plan for a value stream mapping activity

• The mechanics of mapping, including key metrics for office/service/knowledge work

• How to create an actionable Value Stream Transformation Plan

Page 3: Value Stream Mapping

Not One.

3

Page 4: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc.

Wherever there is a request and a deliverable,

there is a value stream.

4

Page 5: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Defined Value Stream: All of the activities required to transform a

customer request into a good or service.

5

First defined in The Machine That Changed the World, James Womack, Daniel Jones, & Daniel Roos, 1990.

Process Process Process

Customer

Request

Customer

Receipt

Page 6: Value Stream Mapping

Work: Degrees of Granularity

Value Stream

Process Process Process

Step Step Step

6

Macro Perspective

• Define strategic direction (“what”)

• Heavy leadership involvement

• Value Stream Mapping

Micro Perspective

• Identify the tactical “how”

• Heavy frontline involvement

• Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Page 7: Value Stream Mapping

7

Basic Current State Value Stream Map

Page 8: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Mapping’s Roots

• Value

• Value Stream

• Flow

• Pull

• Perfection

1996

Page 9: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Mapping Progression

Mike Rother & John Shook, 1999

Beau Keyte & Drew Locher, 2004

Karen Martin & Mike Osterling, 2014

www.bitly.com/VSMbk

Page 10: Value Stream Mapping

Your Goal? Get the Most from Value Stream Mapping

Page 11: Value Stream Mapping

Common Failings

• VSM used solely as a work design exercise

• VSM used to make tactical vs. strategic decisions

• Inappropriate mapping team—or no team at all

• Maps at process level, not value stream level

• Maps with no metrics

• Maps that are too narrow in scope, functionally

• The effects of improvement aren’t felt by the customer

• Not leveraging the method to shift leadership mindsets and culture

Page 12: Value Stream Mapping

VSM Aids in Developing Systems Thinking

12

System Efficiency = Optimal Value Stream Performance

Individual Efficiency = Sub-optimization

Page 13: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Mapping is a

Strategic, Leadership-Heavy

Activity

Page 14: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 14

Who? Accountability Practice / Tool

Sr. Leaders “What has to happen” Hoshin Planning, Value Stream Mapping

Frontlines “How it will happen” Kaizen Events, Just-do-its, and Projects

Improvement Roles St

rate

gic

Tact

ical

Middle Management

Page 15: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Maps: Strategy Before Tactics

Where am I? Where do I want

to go?

I-80 option I-40 option I-70 option

Which route should I take?

? ? ?

Page 16: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 16

VSM Enables an Org to Get Above the Work

Page 17: Value Stream Mapping

17

Page 18: Value Stream Mapping

18

1 Information

Flow

2 Work Flow

3 Timeline

Basic Current State Value Stream Map

Page 19: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 19

Lead Time vs. Process Time

Lead Time (LT)

Work Received

Work passed to next process or

department

Process Time (PT)

Lead Time = Elapsed time; Throughput time; turnaround time Process Time = Touch time; work time; cycle time

Work is Idle Work is Idle

Page 20: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc.

Measuring Quality: Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Customer

Process 1

Process 2

Process 3

Process 4

Page 21: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 21

Multiple downstream customers reporting different %C&As from the same supplier

Block 5 reported that they rework Block 4’s output 25% of the time Block 7 reported that they, too, rework Block 4’s output 50% of the time. (0.75 x 0.50) x 100 = 37.5%

Page 22: Value Stream Mapping

22

Value Stream Maps Help Visualize Problems

Page 23: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc.

VSM Helps Break Down Functional Silos

23

Function Function Function Function

Core Value Stream

Support Value Stream

Support Value Stream Customer

Customer

Customer

Page 24: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 24

Customer

1

Process 3

Function E

LT = 0.5 days

PT = 30 mins.

%C&A = 95%

4

4

10 mins.

1 days

120 mins.

2 days

30 mins.

0.5 days Total LT = 3.5 days

Total PT = 160 mins.

Activity Ratio = 9.5%

Rolled %C&A = 89.3%

Process 2

Function C

LT = 2 days

PT = 120 mins.

%C&A = 95%

3

3

ABC Technology, Inc.

Future State Value Stream Map

Name of Value Stream Being Mapped

Demand Rate = XX / Year

Name of Value Stream Champion

Mapping Date

IT-1 IT-2

5 items

Process 1

Function A

LT = 1 days

PT = 10 mins.

%C&A = 99%

5

2

1 items 10 items

Standard

work

Modified

approvals

IT interface

Cross-

train

Cross-

train

Standard

workError

proof

Basic Value Stream Map: Future State

Page 25: Value Stream Mapping

J F M A M J J A S O N D

1 PROJ Steve 0%

2 PROJ Steve 100%

3 KE Bruce 50%

4 KE Bruce 50%

5 PROJ Jessie 100%

6 PROJ Sally 100%

7 KE Jessie 0%

8 PROJ Mike 100%

9 JDI Jessie 50%

10 PROJ Steve 80%

11 PROJ Steve 10%

12 PROJ Bob 0%

13 JDI Jessie 100%

14 PROJ Marcia 25%

15 PROJ Tom 30%

16 KE Marcia 50%

17 PROJ Sally 50%

Value Stream Champion Sally Brooks

Value Stream Mapping Facilitator Karen Martin

Value Stream Transformation PlanValue Stream Product Y Scheduled Review Dates

Executive Sponsor Jim McMahon 2/10 + bi-weekly Thu 10 am

Socialize new criteria for engineering,

quality, & purchasing involvement.

Date Created 1/5/2014

Kaizen

Burst #Improvement Objective / Hypothesis Proposed Countermeasure

Exec.

Method *Owner

Planned Timeline for ExecutionStatus

Create procedure/train GS service engineers to

properly feedback suggestions to engineering.

Create bulletin re: standardized headplate

design to eliminate flange orientation.

Create visual "milestone" timeline to

educate customers.

Define technical info needed from

customer and when.

Signature: Signature: Signature:

Revise standard Ts & Cs to incorporate time limit

for customer approval for f inal payment.

Error proof P.O. info (correct specs, ship to,

etc.); notify customer re missing info and

drop dead date.

Create criteria for LOI acceptance.

Add initial project release in SF.

Resocialize existing customer-requested

CO procedure.

One piece engineering flow

Agreement

Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion Value Stream Mapping Facilitator

* Execution Method = JDI (Just-do-it), KE (Kaizen Event), or Proj (Project)

Move to one release (pump & systems)

Date: Date: Date:

Create commodity management team &

supplier SLAs.

Standardize WPS/PQR from suppliers.

Revise proposal template to limit time to 4

revisions.

Create pull signal for invoicing.

Create trigger to release (BOMs) for

purchase.

Co

nfi

de

nti

al C

on

ten

t R

em

ove

d

Page 26: Value Stream Mapping

Value Stream Performance Sample Results

Metric Current State Projected Future

State Projected

% Improvement

Lead Time (PO to shipping)

17 months 7.5 months 56%

Process Time 600 hours 450 hours 25% (22 FTEs)

Rolled % Complete & Accurate

0% 21% > 2,000%

On-time delivery 13% 90% 592%

# Internally-produced Change Orders

25/project 12/project 52%

Freed Cash flow $25M per year

Page 27: Value Stream Mapping

27

Visualize the entire cycle of value delivery on a single sheet of paper

27

Page 28: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 28

Executing Transformation

Plan

Value Stream Mapping

Making Specific

Improvements

Page 29: Value Stream Mapping

Prepare Understand

Current State Design

Future State

Develop Transformation

Plan

Execute Transformation

Plan

Three Consecutive Days 4 Weeks Prior to Mapping

Following Mapping

Repeat

Value Stream Mapping Activity Phases and Timing

29

Page 30: Value Stream Mapping

1

2 1

3 2

4 3

5 4

5

1 6

2 7

3 8

4 9

5 10

1

2 1

3 2

4 3

5 4

1

2

3

4 Date: Date:engagement, financials, lead time, safety records, etc.

effectiveness, market trends, customer satisfaction, employee Signature:

Date:

Relevant Data Agreement

Examples: work volume & volume variation, process quality &

Executive SponsorWhat data is required to understand relevant current state isues.

Signature: Signature:

How will the business, internal and external customers, and Function

internal and external suppliers benefit from value stream improvement? SMEs that may not be needed full time

Always a nice touch; keeps

the team from wandering

On-site, ample wall space,

quiet/private location

Benefits to Customers & Business On-Call Support

Increase <defined metric> from X to Y (Z% improvement).

Reduce <defined metric> from X to Y (Z% improvement).

Measurable Target Condition

What's driving the need for improvement? Function

Leadership-heavy

Current State Problems & Business Needs Mapping Team

Boundaries &

Limitations

Improvement Time

Frame

What is the team NOT authorized to change?

Typically 3-6 months

Last Step Task on last process block

Logistics

CoordinatorNot always needed

Aids in consensus building

and organizational learning.

Typically the last hour of the

day.

First Step Task on first process block

Briefing

Dates &

Times

Meals

Provided

Briefing

Attendees

** required

*optional

List the the people that are

required to attend the briefings (**)

and those whose attendance is

optional (*).

Demand Rate

Trigger

How many times is this done per wk, qtr, mo, or yr?

What initiates the process?

Value Stream Mapping CharterScope Accountable Parties Logistics

Required: typically VP or C-level

If needed—often director or

manager level

Specific

Conditions

What circumstances are included and excluded?

(e.g., type of customer, geographic location, etc.)

Value Stream

Champion

Value stream being improvedExecutive

SponsorValue Stream

Event Dates

& Times

3 days typically; consecutive

is best; 6 hrs per day

minimum; 7 or 8 hrs is best

Required: skilled, objective person

leading the activity

Base-camp

LocationFacilitator

Name

Name

FacilitatorValue Stream Champion

Contact Information

Contact Information

Charter: Critical planning, communication, and consensus-building tool

Available at www.ksmartin.com/vsm-charter

Page 31: Value Stream Mapping

Daily Briefings

31

#1 – Reduce resistance

#2 – Build consensus

#3 – Gain commitment

Page 32: Value Stream Mapping

Socializing the Charter

• Conversation, not merely an email attachment.

• To the entire workforce who will be affected by change.

• Adjust the charter if new discoveries or concerns surface.

Page 33: Value Stream Mapping

Prepare Understand

Current State Design

Future State

Develop Transformation

Plan

Execute Transformation

Plan

Three Consecutive Days 4 Weeks Prior to Mapping

Following Mapping

Repeat

Value Stream Mapping Activity Phases and Timing

33

Page 34: Value Stream Mapping

Current & Future State Notes

34

• Current State

– Walk the value stream

– Surface all problems: WIP, delays, errors/defects, work environment, morale, IT systems

– Visually depict

• Future State

– Use relevant countermeasures to add value and remove waste

– Design to the performance targets and timeframe defined in the Charter

Page 35: Value Stream Mapping

Current State Value Stream Map

35

Page 36: Value Stream Mapping

Future State Value Stream Map

36

Page 37: Value Stream Mapping

Prepare Understand

Current State Design

Future State

Develop Transformation

Plan

Execute Transformation

Plan

Three Consecutive Days 4 Weeks Prior to Mapping

Following Mapping

Repeat

Value Stream Mapping Activity Phases and Timing

37

Page 38: Value Stream Mapping

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 38

J F M A M J J A S O N D

1 PROJ Steve 0%

2 PROJ Steve 100%

3 KE Bruce 50%

4 KE Bruce 50%

5 PROJ Jessie 100%

6 PROJ Sally 100%

7 KE Jessie 0%

8 PROJ Mike 100%

9 JDI Jessie 50%

10 PROJ Steve 80%

11 PROJ Steve 10%

12 PROJ Bob 0%

13 JDI Jessie 100%

14 PROJ Marcia 25%

15 PROJ Tom 30%

16 KE Marcia 50%

17 PROJ Sally 50%

Value Stream Champion Sally Brooks

Value Stream Mapping Facilitator Karen Martin

Value Stream Transformation PlanValue Stream Product Y Scheduled Review Dates

Executive Sponsor Jim McMahon 2/10 + bi-weekly Thu 10 am

Socialize new criteria for engineering,

quality, & purchasing involvement.

Date Created 1/5/2014

Kaizen

Burst #Improvement Objective / Hypothesis Proposed Countermeasure

Exec.

Method *Owner

Planned Timeline for ExecutionStatus

Create procedure/train GS service engineers to

properly feedback suggestions to engineering.

Create bulletin re: standardized headplate

design to eliminate flange orientation.

Create visual "milestone" timeline to

educate customers.

Define technical info needed from

customer and when.

Signature: Signature: Signature:

Revise standard Ts & Cs to incorporate time limit

for customer approval for f inal payment.

Error proof P.O. info (correct specs, ship to,

etc.); notify customer re missing info and

drop dead date.

Create criteria for LOI acceptance.

Add initial project release in SF.

Resocialize existing customer-requested

CO procedure.

One piece engineering flow

Agreement

Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion Value Stream Mapping Facilitator

* Execution Method = JDI (Just-do-it), KE (Kaizen Event), or Proj (Project)

Move to one release (pump & systems)

Date: Date: Date:

Create commodity management team &

supplier SLAs.

Standardize WPS/PQR from suppliers.

Revise proposal template to limit time to 4

revisions.

Create pull signal for invoicing.

Create trigger to release (BOMs) for

purchase.Co

nfi

de

nti

al C

on

ten

t R

em

ove

d

Value Stream Champion typically owns the

Transformation Plan

Page 39: Value Stream Mapping

Physically Post the Future State Map

Physically Post

the Transformation Plan

Page 40: Value Stream Mapping

And Repeat…

Page 41: Value Stream Mapping

41

Who Owns the Value Stream?

Page 42: Value Stream Mapping

Coach / Facilitator / Consultant / Trainer: Lean transformation & business performance improvement in all industries.

Teacher: University of California, San Diego

Author & Speaker: Karen Martin, President

The Karen Martin Group, Inc.

@karenmartinopex

42 www.ksmartin.com/subscribe

2013 Shingo Prize winner!