This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
VALUATION REPORT 2 NORTH LASALLE 2 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, Cook County, Illinois 60602 CBRE, Inc. File No. 13-164CH-2400 Client Reference No. 2NL
Jim Vallos HARBOR GROUP INTERNATIONAL 999 Waterside Drive, Suite 2300 Norfolk, Virginia 23510
Pursuant to our engagement letter for real estate valuation services, CBRE’s individual appraisal reports for each asset will be addressed to Harbor Group International to assist in establishing an estimated value of the commercial real estate. CBRE’s appraisal reports to be provided will not constitute a recommendation to any person to purchase or sell any shares or units. In connection with the preparation of the reports, CBRE may review the information supplied or otherwise made available to it by us for reasonableness, CBRE will assume and rely upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it by any other party, and will not undertake any duty or responsibility to verify independently any of such information. CBRE will not make or obtain an independent valuation or appraisal of any other assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) other than our commercial real estate. With respect to operating or financial forecasts and other information and data to be provided to or otherwise to be reviewed by or discussed with CBRE, CBRE will assume that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our management, board of directors and advisor, and will rely upon us to advise CBRE promptly if any information previously provided becomes inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of its review. In performing its analyses, CBRE will make numerous other assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic and regulatory conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond CBRE’s control and our control, as well as certain factual matters. See "Assumptions and Limiting Conditions" section in this Appraisal. Furthermore, CBRE’s analysis, opinions and conclusions will necessarily be based upon market, economic, financial and other circumstances and conditions existing prior to the valuation and any material change in such circumstances and conditions may affect CBRE’s analysis and conclusions. The foregoing is a summary of the standard assumptions, qualifications and limitations that generally apply to CBRE’s appraisal reports. All of the CBRE appraisal reports, including the analysis, opinions and conclusions set forth in such reports, are qualified by the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the respective appraisal reports. As such, any and all parties agree to indemnify CBRE against certain liabilities arising out of this engagement. CBRE, Inc. confirms that with respect to the Valuations prepared by them, the Valuations were prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. The current economic definition of market value as agreed upon by agencies that regulate federal financial institutions in the U.S. (and used in the Valuations) is “the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus”. Implicit in the definition of market value is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (i) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (ii) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; (iii) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure of each individual property in the open market; (iv) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (v) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.
Page 2 of 2
There are three generally-accepted approaches to developing an opinion of value: income capitalization, cost and sales comparison. In appraisal practice, an approach to value is included or eliminated based on its applicability to the property type being valued and the quality of information available. The reliability of each approach depends on the availability and comparability of market data as well as the motivation and thinking of purchasers. These valuation methods are methods traditionally used by investors when acquiring properties of this nature. For the Valuations, CBRE, Inc. utilized the sales comparison and income capitalization approaches. In determining the approximate market value of the Properties, CBRE, Inc. relied on operating and financial data provided by or on behalf of the Company. Each of the Appraisers believe that their applicable Appraisal gives appropriate consideration to projected net operating income for each property in terms of potential rental income, loss to lease, concessions, vacancy, credit loss, other property income, operating expenses and provisions for required capital improvements. CBRE, Inc. visited each applicable Property to inspect the interior and exterior of the property, as well as the surrounding environment. CBRE, Inc. reviewed the micro and/or macro market environments with respect to physical and economic factors relevant to the valuation process. This process included interviews with regional and/or local market participants, available published data, and other various resources. CBRE, Inc. also conducted regional and/or local research with respect to the following: applicable tax data; zoning requirements; flood zone status; demographics; income and expense data; and comparable data. Caution should be exercised in the evaluation and use of appraisal results. An appraisal is an estimate of market value as of a specified date based upon assumptions and limiting conditions and any extraordinary assumptions specific to the relevant Valuation. It is not a precise measure of value but is based on a subjective comparison of related activity taking place in the real estate market. The Valuations are based on various assumptions of future expectations and while the relevant appraiser’s internal forecasts of net operating income for the applicable properties is considered by such appraiser to be reasonable at the current time, some of the assumptions may not materialize or may differ materially from actual experience in the future. The Shares of the Company will not necessarily trade at values determined solely by reference to the underlying value of its real estate assets. Accordingly, the Shares of the Company may trade at a premium or a discount to values implied by the Asset Valuations.
V A L U A T I O N & A D V I S O R Y S E R V I C E S
311 South Wacker Drive, 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60606
T (312) 233-8662 F (312) 233-8660
www.cbre.com
October 28, 2013 Jim Vallos HARBOR GROUP INTERNATIONAL 999 Waterside Drive, Suite 2300 Norfolk, Virginia 23510 RE: Appraisal of 2 North LaSalle 2 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, Cook County, Illinois 60602 CBRE, Inc. File No 13-164CH-2400 Client Reference No 2NL
Dear Mr. Vallos:
At your request and authorization, CBRE, Inc. has prepared an appraisal of the market value of the referenced property. Our analysis is presented in the following Self-Contained Appraisal Report.
The subject is a 694,336 SF office tower located at 2 N. LaSalle Street in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. The improvements were originally constructed in 1979 and underwent renovations in 2001. The building is situated on a .669 acre site located at the northwest corner of LaSalle and Madison Streets, within the Central Loop submarket of the Chicago CBD. Building amenities include on-site management, conference room, bike room, retail branch bank, convenience store, and restaurant. Currently, the property is 79.1% leased/occupied and is considered to be in good overall condition. The subject is anchored by Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP (27%), Harris Associates (8%) and Levenfeld Pearl (8%) and Hartford Fire Insurance (7%). The subject is more fully described, legally and physically, within the enclosed report.
Based on the analysis contained in the following report, the market value of the subject is concluded as follows:
MARKET VALUE CONCLUSIONAppraisal Premise Interest Appraised Date of Value Value ConclusionAs Is - Gross Value Leased Fee Interest September 30, 2013 $138,600,000
As Is - Net Value Leased Fee Interest September 30, 2013 $135,350,000
Data, information, and calculations leading to the value conclusion are incorporated in the report following this letter. The report, in its entirety, including all assumptions and limiting conditions, is an integral part of, and inseparable from, this letter.
The following appraisal sets forth the most pertinent data gathered, the techniques employed, and the reasoning leading to the opinion of value. The analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed based on, and this report has been prepared in conformance with, our interpretation of the guidelines and recommendations set forth in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. It also conforms to Title XI Regulations and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) updated in 1994 and further updated by the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines promulgated in 2010.
The intended use and user of our report are specifically identified in our report as agreed upon in our contract for services and/or reliance language found in the report. No other use or user of the report is permitted by any other party for any other purpose. Dissemination of this report by any party to non-client, non-intended users does not extend reliance to any other party and CBRE will not be responsible for unauthorized use of the report, its conclusions or contents used partially or in its entirety.
It has been a pleasure to assist you in this assignment. If you have any questions concerning the analysis, or if CBRE, Inc. can be of further service, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted, CBRE, Inc. - VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES
J. Scott Patrick, MAI, CCIM Lesley J. Linder, MAI, CCIM Director Managing Director Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of Illinois License No. 553.000226 Expires: September 30, 2013
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of Illinois License No. 553.001947 Expires: September 30, 2013
We certify to the best of our knowledge and belief:
1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions
and limiting conditions and are our personal, impartial and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
3. We have no present or prospective interest in or bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest in or bias with respect to the parties involved with this assignment.
4. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.
5. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.
6. This appraisal assignment was not based upon a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan.
7. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, as well as the requirements of the State of Illinois.
8. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
9. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.
10. As of the date of this report, J. Scott Patrick, MAI, CCIM and Lesley J. Linder, MAI, CCIM have completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute.
11. J. Scott Patrick, MAI, CCIM and Lesley J. Linder, MAI, CCIM have personally inspected the property that is the subject of this report.
12. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this report. 13. Valuation & Advisory Services operates as an independent economic entity within CBRE, Inc.
Although employees of other CBRE, Inc. divisions may be contacted as a part of our routine market research investigations, absolute client confidentiality and privacy were maintained at all times with regard to this assignment without conflict of interest.
14. J. Scott Patrick, MAI, CCIM has not, but Lesley J. Linder, MAI, CCIM has provided appraisal services regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment.
J. Scott Patrick, MAI, CCIM Lesley J. Linder, MAI, CCIM Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of Illinois License No. 553.000226 Expires: September 30, 2013
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of Illinois License No. 553.001947 Expires: September 30, 2013
Income Capitalization Approach $138,600,000 $199.62
Insurable Value (Replacement Cost) $146,200,000 $210.56
CONCLUDED MARKET VALUE
Appraisal Premise Interest Appraised Value
As Is - Gross Value Leased Fee Interest $138,600,000
As Is - Net Value Leased Fee Interest $135,350,000
Compiled by CBRE
September 30, 2013
Date of Value
September 30, 2013
The following capital items (Tenant Improvements, Leasing Commissions and Free Rent) as provided by the client are deducted from the gross market value to arrive at the net market value of the property:
STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS (SWOT)
Strengths and weaknesses are internal to the subject; opportunities & threats are external to the subject.
Strengths
Approximately 27% of the subject’s rentable area is occupied by the prominent law firm of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP. The current lease extends through May 2020.
The property was extensively renovated in 2001. The property is located at a prime intersection in Chicago’s CBD.
Weaknesses
The subject is 79.1% leased which is generally lower than the current market. Harris Associates who occupy 58,655 SF (including storage) have announced their intention to
vacate the building effective July 31, 2014. In the past year, the property has lost several prominent tenants including Cohen Financial and
Ares Management, who combined had occupied over 41,000 SF.
The property features several full floor and other vacant spaces that if leased, could enhance the cash flow and return on investment.
The CBD has been experiencing revived interest from suburban businesses or companies with large office campuses in the suburbs, moving their offices to Chicago.
The lack of new deliveries to the CBD has helped lease up vacant space and begin to justify rent growth that will likely pickup in the coming months.
Net absorption for all CBD office properties has trended positive for the past two calendar years.
Threats
General improvement in the overall economic climate both locally and nationally is not expected until sustainable levels of job growth and decreasing unemployment trends are evident.
The fiscal health of local, county, and state governments will continue to pose an overall risk throughout the general economy.
An extraordinary assumption is defined as “an assumption directly related to a specific assignment,
which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. Extraordinary
assumptions presume as fact otherwise uncertain information about physical, legal, or economic
characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property such as market
conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis.” 1
We assume that the property condition on the prospective valuation date, September 30, 2013, will be the same as of the date of our inspection
The following capital items (Tenant Improvements, Leasing Commissions and Free Rent) as provided by the client are deducted from the gross market value to arrive at the net market value of the property.
HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS
A hypothetical condition is defined as “that which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the
purpose of analysis. Hypothetical conditions assume conditions contrary to known facts about
physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the
property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis.” 2
None noted
1 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 5th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010), 73.
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH .................................................................................... 61
RECONCILIATION OF VALUE .................................................................................................. 90
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS .......................................................................... 91
ADDENDA A Improved Sale Data Sheets B Rent Comparable Data Sheets C Operating Data D ARGUS Supporting Schedules E Précis METRO Report - Economy.com, Inc. F Client Contract Information G Qualifications
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property. The current
economic definition of market value agreed upon by agencies that regulate federal financial
institutions in the U.S. (and used herein) is as follows:
The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all
conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and
assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of
a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best
interests; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements
comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or
creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 3
INTENDED USE OF REPORT
This appraisal is to be used for internal decision making and investor reporting purposes, and no
other use is permitted.
INTENDED USER OF REPORT
This appraisal is to be used by Harbor Group International and its affiliates and investors, and no
other user may rely on our report unless as specifically indicated in the report.
Intended Users - the intended user is the person (or entity) who the appraiser intends will use the results of the appraisal. The client may provide the appraiser with information about other potential users of the appraisal, but the appraiser ultimately determines who the appropriate users are given the appraisal problem to be solved. Identifying the intended users is necessary so that the appraiser can report the opinions and conclusions developed in the appraisal in a manner that is clear and understandable to the intended users. Parties who receive or might receive a copy of the appraisal are not necessarily intended users. The appraiser’s responsibility is to the intended users identified in the report, not to all readers of the appraisal report. 4
3 Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), 12 CFR Part 34, Subpart C – Appraisals, 34.42 (g); Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS), 12 CFR 564.2 (g); Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 5th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010), 122-123. This is also compatible with the RTC, FDIC, FRS and NCUA definitions of market value as well as the updated Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines promulgated in 2010.
4 Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2008), 132.
Site Data Source(s)/Verification:Size Assessor, Zoning and Planning Dept.Excess/Surplus N/A
Compiled by CBRE
RESOURCE VERIFICATION
Improved Data Source(s)/Verification:Gross Size/Units Estimated based on NRA and industry standardsNet Size/Units Rent roll and other information provided by managementArea Breakdown/Use Rent roll and other information provided by managementNo. Bldgs. Physical inspectionParking Spaces N/AYOC Information provided by management/Assessor's office
Compiled by CBRE
RESOURCE VERIFICATION
Economic Data Source(s)/Verification:Deferred Maintenance: Property OwnershipBuilding Costs: Marshall Valuation ServiceIncome Data: Operating statements and lease documentsExpense Data: Operating statements
Compiled by CBRE
RESOURCE VERIFICATION
Other Source(s)/Verification:Flood Plain: FEMAReal Estate Taxes: Cook County Assessor and TreasurerZoning: City of Chicago
Compiled by CBRE
Extent to Which the Property is Identified
CBRE, Inc. collected the relevant information about the subject from the owner (or representatives),
public records and through an inspection of the subject property. The property was identified through
the following sources:
postal address assessor’s records legal description title report
Extent to Which the Property is Inspected
CBRE, Inc. inspected the interior and exterior of the subject, as well as its surrounding environs on the
effective date of appraisal. This included a representative sample of vacant and occupied suites,
public areas, and mechanical areas. This inspection sample was considered an adequate
representation of the subject property and is the basis for our findings.
Hyatt Regency Chicago 2,019 $189-$215Palmer House Hilton 1,639 $129-459Hilton Chicago 1,544 $129-459Sheraton Chicago Hotel 1,209 $169-259Chicago marriott Downtown 1,198 $169-259Congress Plaza Hotel 870 $169-259Intercontinental Chicago 792 $190-$250Source: Crain's
Largest Hotels in Chicago
BOUNDARIES
The neighborhood boundaries are detailed as follows:
North: Chicago River South: Congress Parkway East: State Street West: Wells Street
LAND USE
Land uses in the immediate area of the subject property are primarily mid-to-high rise in nature and
consist of a mixture of commercial office and retail properties as well as government facilities.
Some of Chicago’s finest cultural and entertainment attractions surround the subject. The Harold
Washington Library, located southeast of the subject, is the world’s largest public library. Downtown
theaters include the Lyric Opera and the Goodman Theatre, both renowned for the quality of their
original productions, and Adler & Sullivan’s famous Auditorium Theatre.
Several of Chicago’s top hotels are within walking distance of the property. The recently renovated
Palmer House, the most famous and one of the largest in the city, is just to the east. Other nearby
hotels include the Hilton, the Congress Plaza, the Renaissance, the Hotel Blake, the W Hotel, the
Silversmith, the Hampton Inn, the Hard Rock Hotel and two Club Quarters hotels. The last six hotels
occupy recently converted office space. Below is a summary of the top five largest hotels in the CBD.
Other noteworthy landmarks in or in proximity to the Central Loop are the Thompson Center, The Art
Institute and a number of renowned theaters on the district’s north side.
COMPANY NAME SALES ($ MIL) EMPLOYEES INDUSTRYThe Boeing Company $ 68,735 171,700 AircraftUnited Continental Holdings, Inc. $ 37,110 87,000 Air transportationExelon Corporation $ 18,924 19,267 Gas and other servicesAon Corporation $ 11,287 62,000 Insurance agents, brokers, and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company $ 10,611 58,000 Commercial printingC N A Insurance Companies $ 9,209 8,000 Fire, marine, and casualty insuranceCommonwealth Edison Company $ 6,204 5,692 Electric servicesMarmon Holdings, Inc. $ 5,967 16,000 Industrial machinerySBC Teleholdings, Inc $ 5,661 65,345 Telephone communicationTelephone and Data Systems, Inc. $ 5,180 12,300 Radiotelephone communicationFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago $ 5,112 1,379 Federal reserve banks
HEADQUARTERS WITHIN CHICAGO'S CBD
Source: Hoover's
The Chicago MSA has long been a destination for some of the nation’s major corporations; recently
this trend has begun to focus on the CBD in particular. More often the Fortune 500 businesses in the
area are learning that to attract top talent to their organization; they must have a presence in the
Loop. This is has had a major impact on the demand for prime office space within the CBD,
specifically the Central and West Loop submarkets. The chart below displays the top 10 largest
corporations who are headquartered within the Chicago CBD.
State Street, Chicago’s historic shopping street, is east of the subject. The majority of the retail
developments within this district are along a five-block stretch on State Street from Randolph Street to
Jackson Boulevard, referred to as the State Street Corridor. Prominent retail developments include the
1.9 million square foot Macy’s (former Marshall Field’s Building housing Field’s flagship 900,000
square foot store) and One North State, immediately south of Macy’s. Major retailers in immediate
proximity to these developments include a 240,000 square foot Sears, Old Navy, Target, Walgreens,
and Nordstrom Rack.
Many of the famous State Street department stores are gone, but their landmark structures remain,
including some of the finest buildings by W. L. Jenney, Daniel Burnham, Holabird & Root and Louis
Sullivan. The upper floors are now university and office space, while the lower floors are filled with
retailers that serve the 750,000 people who work in the CBD. The emergence of downtown Chicago
as a residential district is returning State Street to a retailing destination once again. The Sullivan
Center, the former home of Carson Pirie Scott, is a historic mixed-use building located at the corner of
State Street and Madison Street and a national historic landmark, designed by renowned Chicago
architect Louis Sullivan in 1899. The Sullivan Center now houses the new “City Target” in the first and
second levels of the property.
Chicago is undergoing a dramatic shift in living choices for people who work in the CBD. The city’s
suburbs and near north neighborhoods were the primary residential choice for urban professionals as
recently as a decade ago, but many are now choosing to live downtown. More than 43,000
Income2013 Median HH Inc $72,815 $80,126 $64,9042013 Estimated Average Household Income $103,887 $119,421 $104,3562013 Estimated Per Capita Income $59,149 $71,624 $54,968
Age 25+ College Graduates - 2010 6,467 43,578 159,610 Age 25+ Percent College Graduates - 2013 76.0% 79.1% 64.0%
many other office proposals. In addition to the Hines-Ivanhoe venture which now appears to be taking
shape, the following section summarizes the proposed additions to the CBD stock.
Building Name Address Submarket Stories NRA
Union Station 210 S Canal St West Loop 26 1,500,000 River Point 444 W Lake St West Loop 50 1,100,000 301 S Wacker Dr 301 S Wacker Dr West Loop 41 1,002,807 222 W Randolph St 222 W Randolph St West Loop 41 991,805 Wacker Plaza 401 S Wacker Dr West Loop 31 885,304 645 W Madison St 645 W Madison St West Loop 32 779,047 625 W Monroe 625 W Monroe West Loop 29 719,186 199 W Monroe 199 W Monroe St Central Loop 36 695,800 601 W Monroe 601 W Monroe West Loop 26 642,526 625 W Adams 625 W Adams St West Loop 20 435,505 108 N Jefferson St 108 N Jefferson St West Loop 20 366,020 Fulton West 1330 W Fulton St River West 4 140,000 Total Proposed 9,258,000
PROPOSED CHICAGO CBD OFFICES
The following is from Crain’s Chicago Business. With construction close to starting on a new tower,
the downtown office vacancy rate is 13.8 percent, about 4.5 percentage points higher than in 1999,
when work began on the first major skyscraper since 1992. The nine premier downtown office towers
on average charge higher rent and have a lower availability rate than all of the Class A market of
newer buildings. These Trophy buildings total nearly 11.7 million square feet. The following charts
display the year-end vacancy rates and total space of the CBD as well as a performance comparison
of Trophy buildings and Class A buildings.
Chicago CBD Summary and Forecast
Looking ahead, the CBD office market’s growth is expected to remain fairly flat. The trend of
workplace strategy continues to enable companies to become more efficient and decrease their
footprint. Insurance, Law and Financial Service Firms continue to give space back and consolidate.
Net absorption was negative for a second consecutive quarter; however the quarter showed signs of
life with an increase in leases over 100,000 square feet. Lack of new supply until the completion of
new construction (444 W. Lake) as well as redevelopment will continue to impact market conditions.
This is evident in the Google deal at 1000 W. Fulton. Gross weighted asking rates increased for the
fifth consecutive quarter, but a slow economy and lack of an extensive increase in employment will
The following chart summarizes the salient characteristics of the subject site.
SITE SUMMARY
Physical DescriptionGross Site Area 0.669 Acres 29,155 Sq. Ft.Net Site Area 0.669 Acres 29,155 Sq. Ft.Primary Road Frontage LaSalle Street 175 FeetSecondary Road Frontage Madison Street 165 FeetAverage Depth 165 FeetExcess Land Area NoneShapeTopographyPrimary Traffic Counts (24 hrs.) LaSalle Street 16,800Secondary Traffic Counts (24 hrs.) Madison Street 11,000Zoning DistrictFlood Map Panel No. & Date 17031C0419F 19-Aug-08Flood Zone Zone XAdjacent Land UsesEarthquake Zone
Comparative AnalysisAccessVisibilityFunctional UtilityTraffic VolumeAdequacy of UtilitiesLandscapingDrainage
Utilities AdequacyWater YesSewer YesNatural Gas YesElectricity YesTelephone YesMass Transit Yes
Other Yes No UnknownDetrimental Easements XEncroachments XDeed Restrictions XReciprocal Parking Rights XCommon Ingress/Egress X
Pedestrian access is available via entry doors located on the LaSalle and Madison Streets elevations.
Vehicular access to the property is available via a loading dock area located on the north building
elevation, which is accessible via a public alley that runs east-west between LaSalle and Wells Streets.
LaSalle Street is a north-south artery that has long been considered the center of the financial district.
This features one lane of traffic in either direction, plus curb-side loading areas. Long-term street
parking is prohibited.
Madison is an east-west artery that is one-way west-bound. It features two lanes for west-bound traffic
and street parking is prohibited in this area.
Please refer to the prior plat map for the layout of the streets that provide access to the subject.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
CBRE, Inc. is not qualified to detect the existence of potentially hazardous material or underground
storage tanks which may be present on or near the site. The existence of hazardous materials or
underground storage tanks may affect the value of the property. For this appraisal, CBRE, Inc. has
specifically assumed that the property is not affected by any hazardous materials that may be present
on or near the property.
ADJACENT PROPERTIES
The adjacent land uses are summarized as follows:
North: 30 N. LaSalle, a modern high-rise office building. South: Madison Street then 2 S. LaSalle, a modern high-rise office building. East: LaSalle Street and a vintage high-rise office building. West: 12-level, public parking garage with street-level retail.
The adjacent properties are typical of the downtown area and are in generally good condition, typical
of their age/condition.
CONCLUSION
The site is well located in Chicago’s Central Loop market area, with a prominent location along the
LaSalle Street corridor. The property has adequate frontage which allows good pedestrian access.
The site is well located relative to the commuter rail stations, “L” lines, and other public transportation
that is available throughout the city. Overall, the site is ideally suited for high-rise development as is
The following chart summarizes the subject’s zoning requirements.
ZONING SUMMARYCurrent Zoning PD-167; Planned DevelopmentLegally Conforming YesUses Permitted Planned development regulations are
intended to ensure adequate public review of major development proposals; encourage unified planning and development; promote economically beneficial development patterns that are compatible with the character of existing neighborhoods; ensure a level of amenities appropriate to the nature and scale of the project; allow flexibility in application of selected use, bulk, and development standards in order to promote creative building design and high-quality urban design; and encourage protection and conservation of natural resources.
Zoning Change Not likely
Category Zoning Requirement
Maximum Bldg. Coverage 100%Maximum FAR/Density 25.74 : 1Subject's Actual FAR 25.91 : 1
Source: Planning & Zoning Dept.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The improvements represent a legally-conforming use and, if damaged, may be restored without
special permit application. Additional information may be obtained from the appropriate
2 NORTH LASALLE | INSURABLE VALUE (REPLACEMENT COST)
53
INSURABLE VALUE
Insurable value is defined as follows:
1. the value of an asset or asset group that is covered by an insurance policy; can be estimated by deducting costs of noninsurable items (e.g., land value) from market value.
2. value used by insurance companies as the basis for insurance. Often considered to be replacement or reproduction cost plus allowances for debris removal or demolition less deterioration and noninsurable items. Sometimes cash value or market value, but often entirely a cost concept. 5
3. a type of value for insurance purposes. 6
CBRE, Inc. has followed traditional appraisal standards to develop a reasonable calculation based
upon industry practices and industry-accepted publications such as the Marshall Valuation Service.
The methodology employed is a derivation of the cost approach and is not reliable for insurable value
estimates. Actual construction costs and related estimates can vary greatly from this estimate.
The insurable value estimate presented herein is intended to reflect the value of the destructible
portions of the subject, based on the replacement of physical items that are subject to loss from
hazards (excluding indestructible items such as basement excavation, foundation, site work, land value
and indirect costs). In the case of the subject, this estimate is based upon the base building costs
(direct costs) as obtained via the Marshall Valuation Service handbook, with appropriate deductions.
This analysis should not be relied upon to determine proper insurance coverage as only consultants
considered experts in cost estimation and insurance underwriting are qualified to provide an insurable
value. It is provided to aid the client/reader/user as part of their overall decision making process and
no representations or warranties are made by CBRE, Inc. regarding the accuracy of this estimate and
it is strongly recommended that other sources be utilized to develop any estimate of insurable value.
2 NORTH LASALLE | INSURABLE VALUE (REPLACEMENT COST)
54
INSURABLE VALUE (REPLACEMENT COST) CONCLUSION
Primary Building Type: Height per Story: 12'Effective Age: Number of Buildings: 1Condition: Gross Building Area: 755,511 SFExterior Wall: Net Rentable Area: 694,336 SFNumber of Stories: Average Floor Area: 29,058 SF
MVS Sec/Page 0 0 0 0 15/17/344Quality/Bldg. Class 0 0 0 0 Average/ABuilding Component 0 0 0 0 Office BuildingComponent Sq. Ft. 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 755,511 SFBase Square Foot Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $145.12
Name / Address Submarket Tenant Lease Start Size SFContract Rate
$/SF/YRTerm (Mos.) Expenses
100 W Monroe Central Loop Crumbs South Clark Nov-11 1,475 $65.00 143 NNN111 W Washington Central Loop Fifth Third Jan-12 111 $111.35 48 Base Year
TD Ameritrade Jul-11 3,844 $125.00 84 Base Year108 N State Central Loop Puma Nov-09 7,946 $69.00 120 NNN73 W Monroe Central Loop Pret A Manger Jun-11 6,891 $34.00 180 NNN3 First National Plaza Central Loop AT&T Mobility Aug-09 4,813 $50.00 119 NNN
Madison Mojo Jun-09 1,135 $49.92 119 NNN300 N LaSalle Central Loop Chicago Cut Steakhouse Mar-09 7,695 $30.00 185 NNN55 W Monroe Central Loop Caribou Coffee Dec-11 1,200 $72.50 60 NNN353 N Clark Central Loop Black Fin Jun-11 10,500 $40.00 120 Gross
New Italian Concept Jun-11 9,000 $40.00 120 Gross17 N Wabash East Loop Lou M Jewelers May-11 2,000 $78.00 116 Gross
Mon Amie Jewelers Oct-10 1,705 $63.00 140 Gross180 N Michigan East Loop Noodles & Company Aug-08 3,341 $80.00 120 NNN11 E Adams East Loop New Era Nov-11 4,550 $87.91 120 NNN310 S Michigan East Loop Chase Bank Sep-11 4,369 $85.00 120 NNN
My Café Sep-11 1,888 $70.00 120 NNN151 N Michigan East Loop Asking Feb-13 10,000 $75.00 120 NNN
320 N Michigan East Loop Bye Bye Chicago Jun-09 1,500 $120.00 120 NNN55 East Monroe East Loop JP Morgan Chase Bank Feb-09 3,078 $83.25 120 NNN400 N Dearborn River North Einstein Bros. Bagels Dec-07 3,850 $46.00 120 NNN51 W Hubbard River North Hub 51 Nov-07 10,900 $35.16 100 NNN350 N Clark River North AT&T Apr-10 3,707 $57.00 120 NNN
Protein Bar Nov-10 1,710 $52.50 120 NNN26 W Hubbard River North Howl at the Moon Jun-10 5,300 $56.40 120 NNNMarina City River North Tortoise Club Jan-12 5,708 $43.00 120 NNN360 N State River North RAM Restaurant Group Jan-12 9,500 $52.50 120 NNN220 W Kinzie River North 218 Kinzie Restaurant LLC May-12 3,168 $50.91 120 NNN40 W Hubbard River North Ruth's Chris Jun-10 14,624 $42.66 120 NNN400 N LaSalle River North Hannah's Bretzel Sep-11 2,945 $34.75 132 NNN161 W Kinzie River North Smith and Wells Jun-11 9,800 $38.00 120 NNN200 W Jackson West Loop Rupak Corporation N/A N/A $83.73 112 NNN300 W Adams West Loop PNC Bank Oct-09 3,796 $71.75 180 NNN
Overall, an OAR towards the lower portion of the range indicated by the comparable data is
considered appropriate for the following reasons:
Positives
Approximately 27% of the subject’s rentable area is occupied by the prominent law firm of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP. The current lease extends through May 2020.
The property was extensively renovated in 2001. The property is located at a prime intersection in Chicago’s CBD. The property features several full floor and other vacant spaces that if leased, could enhance the
cash flow and return on investment. The CBD has been experiencing revived interest from suburban businesses or companies with
large office campuses in the suburbs, moving their offices to Chicago. The lack of new deliveries to the CBD has helped lease up vacant space and begin to justify rent
growth that will likely pickup in the coming months. Net absorption for all CBD office properties has trended positive for the past two calendar years.
Weaknesses
The subject is 79.1% leased which is generally lower than the current market. Harris Associates who occupy 58,655 SF (including storage) have announced their intention to
vacate the building effective July 31, 2014. In the past year, the property has lost several prominent tenants including Cohen Financial and
Ares Management, who combined had occupied over 41,000 SF. The property features several full floor and other vacant spaces that will require significant capital
costs to re-tenant. The fiscal health of local, county, and state governments will continue to pose an overall risk
A summary of the direct capitalization at stabilized occupancy is illustrated in the following chart.
DIRECT CAPITALIZATION SUMMARY
Income $/Door/Mo. $/SF/Yr Total Potential Rental Income $10,137 $17.52 $12,164,272Vacancy 10.50% (1,064) (1.84) (1,277,249) Credit Loss 0.50% (51) (0.09) (60,821)
Net Rental Income $9,022 $15.59 $10,826,202
Other Income 229 0.40 275,000 Expense Reimbursements 7,047 12.18 8,456,411 Vacancy & Credit Loss 11.00% (800) (1.38) (960,455)
Cost of Sale at Reversion: 1.00%Building Size (SF): 694,336 Percent Residual: 63.5% Reconciled Value Indication (Rounded): $138,600,000Value Per Square Foot: $199.62
The value indications from the approaches to value are summarized as follows:
SUMMARY OF VALUE CONCLUSIONSSales Comparison Approach $137,400,000 Income Capitalization Approach $138,600,000 Reconciled Value $138,600,000
Compiled by CBRE
The cost approach typically gives a reliable value indication when there is strong support for the
replacement cost estimate and when there is minimal depreciation. Considering the amount of
depreciation present in the property, the reliability of the cost approach is diminished. Therefore, the
cost approach is considered not applicable to the subject.
In the sales comparison approach, the subject is compared to similar properties that have been sold
recently or for which listing prices or offers are known. The sales used in this analysis are considered
generally comparable to the subject. In addition, market participants are currently analyzing purchase
prices on investment properties as they relate to available substitutes in the market. Therefore, the
sales comparison approach is considered to provide a reliable value indication, but has been given
secondary emphasis in the final value reconciliation.
The income capitalization approach is applicable to the subject since it is an income producing
property leased in the open market. Market participants are primarily analyzing properties based on
their income generating capability. Therefore, the income capitalization approach is considered a
reasonable and substantiated value indicator and has been given primary emphasis in the final value
estimate.
Based on the foregoing, the market value of the subject has been concluded as follows:
MARKET VALUE CONCLUSIONAppraisal Premise Interest Appraised Date of Value Value ConclusionAs Is - Gross Value Leased Fee Interest September 30, 2013 $138,600,000
As Is - Net Value Leased Fee Interest September 30, 2013 $135,350,000
2 NORTH LASALLE | ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
91
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. Unless otherwise specifically noted in the body of the report, it is assumed that title to the property or properties appraised is clear and marketable and that there are no recorded or unrecorded matters or exceptions to title that would adversely affect marketability or value. CBRE, Inc. is not aware of any title defects nor has it been advised of any unless such is specifically noted in the report. CBRE, Inc., however, has not examined title and makes no representations relative to the condition thereof. Documents dealing with liens, encumbrances, easements, deed restrictions, clouds and other conditions that may affect the quality of title have not been reviewed. Insurance against financial loss resulting in claims that may arise out of defects in the subject’s title should be sought from a qualified title company that issues or insures title to real property.
2. Unless otherwise specifically noted in the body of this report, it is assumed: that the existing improvements on the property or properties being appraised are structurally sound, seismically safe and code conforming; that all building systems (mechanical/electrical, HVAC, elevator, plumbing, etc.) are in good working order with no major deferred maintenance or repair required; that the roof and exterior are in good condition and free from intrusion by the elements; that the property or properties have been engineered in such a manner that the improvements, as currently constituted, conform to all applicable local, state, and federal building codes and ordinances. CBRE, Inc. professionals are not engineers and are not competent to judge matters of an engineering nature. CBRE, Inc. has not retained independent structural, mechanical, electrical, or civil engineers in connection with this appraisal and, therefore, makes no representations relative to the condition of improvements. Unless otherwise specifically noted in the body of the report: no problems were brought to the attention of CBRE, Inc. by ownership or management; CBRE, Inc. inspected less than 100% of the entire interior and exterior portions of the improvements; and CBRE, Inc. was not furnished any engineering studies by the owners or by the party requesting this appraisal. If questions in these areas are critical to the decision process of the reader, the advice of competent engineering consultants should be obtained and relied upon. It is specifically assumed that any knowledgeable and prudent purchaser would, as a precondition to closing a sale, obtain a satisfactory engineering report relative to the structural integrity of the property and the integrity of building systems. Structural problems and/or building system problems may not be visually detectable. If engineering consultants retained should report negative factors of a material nature, or if such are later discovered, relative to the condition of improvements, such information could have a substantial negative impact on the conclusions reported in this appraisal. Accordingly, if negative findings are reported by engineering consultants, CBRE, Inc. reserves the right to amend the appraisal conclusions reported herein.
3. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or may not be present on the property was not observed by the appraisers. CBRE, Inc. has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. CBRE, Inc., however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, contaminated groundwater or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired.
We have inspected, as thoroughly as possible by observation, the land; however, it was impossible to personally inspect conditions beneath the soil. Therefore, no representation is made as to these matters unless specifically considered in the appraisal.
4. All furnishings, equipment and business operations, except as specifically stated and typically considered as part of real property, have been disregarded with only real property being considered in the report unless otherwise stated. Any existing or proposed improvements, on or off-site, as well as any alterations or repairs considered, are assumed to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices based upon the information submitted to CBRE, Inc. This report may be subject to amendment upon re-inspection of the subject subsequent to repairs, modifications, alterations and completed new construction. Any estimate of Market Value is as of the date indicated; based upon the information, conditions and projected levels of operation.
5. It is assumed that all factual data furnished by the client, property owner, owner’s representative, or persons designated by the client or owner to supply said data are accurate and correct unless otherwise specifically noted in the appraisal report. Unless otherwise specifically noted in the appraisal report, CBRE, Inc. has no reason to believe that any of the data furnished contain any material error. Information and data referred to in this paragraph include, without being limited to, numerical street addresses, lot and block numbers, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers, land dimensions, square footage area of the land, dimensions of the improvements, gross building areas, net rentable areas, usable areas, unit count, room count, rent schedules, income data, historical operating expenses, budgets, and related data. Any material error in any of the above data could have a substantial impact on the conclusions reported. Thus, CBRE, Inc. reserves the right to amend conclusions reported if made aware of any such error. Accordingly, the client-addressee should
2 NORTH LASALLE | ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
92
carefully review all assumptions, data, relevant calculations, and conclusions within 30 days after the date of delivery of this report and should immediately notify CBRE, Inc. of any questions or errors.
6. The date of value to which any of the conclusions and opinions expressed in this report apply, is set forth in the Letter of Transmittal. Further, that the dollar amount of any value opinion herein rendered is based upon the purchasing power of the American Dollar on that date. This appraisal is based on market conditions existing as of the date of this appraisal. Under the terms of the engagement, we will have no obligation to revise this report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date of the appraisal. However, CBRE, Inc. will be available to discuss the necessity for revision resulting from changes in economic or market factors affecting the subject.
7. CBRE, Inc. assumes no private deed restrictions, limiting the use of the subject in any way.
8. Unless otherwise noted in the body of the report, it is assumed that there are no mineral deposit or subsurface rights of value involved in this appraisal, whether they be gas, liquid, or solid. Nor are the rights associated with extraction or exploration of such elements considered unless otherwise stated in this appraisal report. Unless otherwise stated it is also assumed that there are no air or development rights of value that may be transferred.
9. CBRE, Inc. is not aware of any contemplated public initiatives, governmental development controls, or rent controls that would significantly affect the value of the subject.
10. The estimate of Market Value, which may be defined within the body of this report, is subject to change with market fluctuations over time. Market value is highly related to exposure, time promotion effort, terms, motivation, and conclusions surrounding the offering. The value estimate(s) consider the productivity and relative attractiveness of the property, both physically and economically, on the open market.
11. Any cash flows included in the analysis are forecasts of estimated future operating characteristics are predicated on the information and assumptions contained within the report. Any projections of income, expenses and economic conditions utilized in this report are not predictions of the future. Rather, they are estimates of current market expectations of future income and expenses. The achievement of the financial projections will be affected by fluctuating economic conditions and is dependent upon other future occurrences that cannot be assured. Actual results may vary from the projections considered herein. CBRE, Inc. does not warrant these forecasts will occur. Projections may be affected by circumstances beyond the current realm of knowledge or control of CBRE, Inc.
12. Unless specifically set forth in the body of the report, nothing contained herein shall be construed to represent any direct or indirect recommendation of CBRE, Inc. to buy, sell, or hold the properties at the value stated. Such decisions involve substantial investment strategy questions and must be specifically addressed in consultation form.
13. Also, unless otherwise noted in the body of this report, it is assumed that no changes in the present zoning ordinances or regulations governing use, density, or shape are being considered. The property is appraised assuming that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, nor national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimates contained in this report is based, unless otherwise stated.
14. This study may not be duplicated in whole or in part without the specific written consent of CBRE, Inc. nor may this report or copies hereof be transmitted to third parties without said consent, which consent CBRE, Inc. reserves the right to deny. Exempt from this restriction is duplication for the internal use of the client-addressee and/or transmission to attorneys, accountants, or advisors of the client-addressee. Also exempt from this restriction is transmission of the report to any court, governmental authority, or regulatory agency having jurisdiction over the party/parties for whom this appraisal was prepared, provided that this report and/or its contents shall not be published, in whole or in part, in any public document without the express written consent of CBRE, Inc. which consent CBRE, Inc. reserves the right to deny. Finally, this report shall not be advertised to the public or otherwise used to induce a third party to purchase the property or to make a “sale” or “offer for sale” of any “security”, as such terms are defined and used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Any third party, not covered by the exemptions herein, who may possess this report, is advised that they should rely on their own independently secured advice for any decision in connection with this property. CBRE, Inc. shall have no accountability or responsibility to any such third party.
15. Any value estimate provided in the report applies to the entire property, and any pro ration or division of the title into fractional interests will invalidate the value estimate, unless such pro ration or division of interests has been set forth in the report.
16. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of utilization. Component values for land and/or buildings are not intended to be used in conjunction with any other property or appraisal and are invalid if so used.
17. The maps, plats, sketches, graphs, photographs and exhibits included in this report are for illustration purposes only and are to be utilized only to assist in visualizing matters discussed within this report. Except as specifically stated, data relative to size or area of the subject and comparable properties has been obtained from sources deemed accurate and reliable. None of the exhibits are to be removed, reproduced, or used apart from this report.
2 NORTH LASALLE | ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
93
18. No opinion is intended to be expressed on matters which may require legal expertise or specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that customarily employed by real estate appraisers. Values and opinions expressed presume that environmental and other governmental restrictions/conditions by applicable agencies have been met, including but not limited to seismic hazards, flight patterns, decibel levels/noise envelopes, fire hazards, hillside ordinances, density, allowable uses, building codes, permits, licenses, etc. No survey, engineering study or architectural analysis has been made known to CBRE, Inc. unless otherwise stated within the body of this report. If the Consultant has not been supplied with a termite inspection, survey or occupancy permit, no responsibility or representation is assumed or made for any costs associated with obtaining same or for any deficiencies discovered before or after they are obtained. No representation or warranty is made concerning obtaining these items. CBRE, Inc. assumes no responsibility for any costs or consequences arising due to the need, or the lack of need, for flood hazard insurance. An agent for the Federal Flood Insurance Program should be contacted to determine the actual need for Flood Hazard Insurance.
19. Acceptance and/or use of this report constitutes full acceptance of the Contingent and Limiting Conditions and special assumptions set forth in this report. It is the responsibility of the Client, or client’s designees, to read in full, comprehend and thus become aware of the aforementioned contingencies and limiting conditions. Neither the Appraiser nor CBRE, Inc. assumes responsibility for any situation arising out of the Client’s failure to become familiar with and understand the same. The Client is advised to retain experts in areas that fall outside the scope of the real estate appraisal/consulting profession if so desired.
20. CBRE, Inc. assumes that the subject analyzed herein will be under prudent and competent management and ownership; neither inefficient or super-efficient.
21. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined and considered in the appraisal report.
22. No survey of the boundaries of the property was undertaken. All areas and dimensions furnished are presumed to be correct. It is further assumed that no encroachments to the realty exist.
23. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. Notwithstanding any discussion of possible readily achievable barrier removal construction items in this report, CBRE, Inc. has not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to determine whether it is in conformance with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the ADA. If so, this fact could have a negative effect on the value estimated herein. Since CBRE, Inc. has no specific information relating to this issue, nor is CBRE, Inc. qualified to make such an assessment, the effect of any possible non-compliance with the requirements of the ADA was not considered in estimating the value of the subject.
24. Client shall not indemnify Appraiser or hold Appraiser harmless unless and only to the extent that the Client misrepresents, distorts, or provides incomplete or inaccurate appraisal results to others, which acts of the Client approximately result in damage to Appraiser. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Appraiser shall have no obligation under this Section with respect to any loss that is caused solely by the active negligence or willful misconduct of a Client and is not contributed to by any act or omission (including any failure to perform any duty imposed by law) by Appraiser. Client shall indemnify and hold Appraiser harmless from any claims, expenses, judgments or other items or costs arising as a result of the Client's failure or the failure of any of the Client's agents to provide a complete copy of the appraisal report to any third party. In the event of any litigation between the parties, the prevailing party to such litigation shall be entitled to recover, from the other, reasonable attorney fees and costs.
25. As part of the client’s requested scope of work, an estimate of insurable value is provided herein. CBRE, Inc. has followed traditional appraisal standards to develop a reasonable calculation based upon industry practices and industry accepted publications such as the Marshal Valuation Service handbook. The methodology employed is a derivation of the cost approach which is primarily used as an academic exercise to help support the market value estimate and therefore is not reliable for Insurable Value estimates. Actual construction costs and related estimates can vary greatly from this estimate.
This analysis should not be relied upon to determine proper insurance coverage which can only be properly estimated by consultants considered experts in cost estimation and insurance underwriting. It is provided to aid the client/reader/user as part of their overall decision making process and no representations or warranties are made by CBRE, Inc. regarding the accuracy of this estimate and it is strongly recommend that other sources be utilized to develop any estimate of insurable value.
OFFICE SALE No. 1550 West WashingtonLocation DataLocation: 550 West Washington Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60661
County: Cook
Parcel No: 17-09-332-016 to 020
Atlas Ref:
Physical DataType: Multi Tenant
Land Area: 0.610 Acres
Gross Building Area: 400,000 SF
Net Rentable Area: 375,000 SF
Usable Bldg Area: 375,000 SF
Year Built: 2000
No. of Stories 16
Parking: On-Street
Condition: Excellent
Exterior Walls: Glass
Class: A
Amenities: Banking, Corner Lot, Energy Star Labeled, LEED Certified - Platinum, Metro/Subway, On Site Management
Sales DataTransaction Type: Sale
Date: 1/2013
Marketing Time: 5 Months
Grantor: Beacon Capital Partners LLC
Grantee: MetLife, Inc.
Document No.: 1301631090
Sale Price: $111,000,000
Financing: Market Terms
Cash Eq. Price: $112,000,000
Req. Capital Cost: $0
Adj. Sale Price: $112,000,000
Verification: Deed
Financial DataSource: Appraiser
Occupancy at Sale: 91.80%
Based On: Existing Income
Total Per SF
Potential Gross Inc: $12,370,306 $32.99
Vacancy & Credit Loss: $210,295 $0.56
Effective Gross Inc: $12,160,011 $32.43
Expenses & Reserves: $5,970,000 $15.92
Net Operating Inc: $6,190,011 $16.51
AnalysisUnderwriting Criteria: Price Per S.F.
Overall Cap Rate (OAR): 5.53%
Projected IRR: 0.00%
Eff Gross Inc Mult (EGIM):
9.21
Op Exp Ratio (OER): 49.10%
Price Per SF: $298.67
Comments550 West Washington is a 375,000 square foot Class A trophy office building located in Chicago's West Loop submarket in Cook County, Illinois. The building is situated on the northwest corner of Washington Boulevard and Clinton Street and is adjacent to Ogilvie Transportation Center, one of the city's two major suburban commuter rail station. The building is 92% leased with the bulk of tenancy carrying a Moody's investment grade credit rating. Primary tenants include Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Raymond James & Associates, Marco Consulting and Constellation NewEnergy. The leases are long term with an average remaining lease term of eleven years. The property recently sold for $111 million or approximately $298.67 per square foot. Based on in place income, the overall capitalization rate on this transaction would be approximately equal to 5.53%. The building was 92% leased at the time of the sale.
OFFICE SALE No. 2125 South Wacker BuildingLocation DataLocation: 125 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
County: Cook
Parcel No:
Atlas Ref:
Physical DataType: Multi Tenant
Land Area: 0.570 Acres
Gross Building Area: 564,000 SF
Net Rentable Area: 518,276 SF
Usable Bldg Area: 518,276 SF
Year Built: 1974, 2005
No. of Stories 31
Parking: None
Condition: Good
Exterior Walls: Concrete
Class: B
Amenities: Banking, Conferencing Facility, Corner Lot, Fitness Center, Food Service, On Site Management, Restaurant
Sales DataTransaction Type: Sale
Date: 12/2012
Marketing Time: NA
Grantor: Tishman Speyer
Grantee: MetLife, Inc.
Document No.: 1235334105
Sale Price: $107,000,000
Financing: Market Terms
Cash Eq. Price: $107,000,000
Req. Capital Cost: $0
Adj. Sale Price: $107,000,000
Verification: Deed
Financial DataSource: Broker
Occupancy at Sale: 92.00%
Based On: Existing Income
Total Per SF
Potential Gross Inc: $0 $0.00
Vacancy & Credit Loss: $0 $0.00
Effective Gross Inc: $0 $0.00
Expenses & Reserves: $0 $0.00
Net Operating Inc: $7,757,500 $14.97
AnalysisUnderwriting Criteria:
Overall Cap Rate (OAR): 7.25%
Projected IRR: 0.00%
Eff Gross Inc Mult (EGIM):
Op Exp Ratio (OER): 0.00%
Price Per SF: $206.45
CommentsThis comparable represents 518,276 rentable square feet located at 125 South Wacker Drive. The building was built in 1974 and is located in Chicago's West Loop Submarket. The building is currently 86% leased. Amenities include banking service, a restaurant, on-site management, and abundance of local transportation and entertainment facilities within walking distance. Asking rent is $18.00 net over a five to ten year term with 3% annual escalations. Expenses are estimated to be $13.68 per square foot. The most recent lease information available was for a new lease to ANI International, for 2,163 square feet over a 5-year term with base rent of $17.25 per square foot on a triple net basis. This lease included 4 months of rent abatement and 3.0% annual rent escalations. Other recent leases have been signed between $13.00 and $17.50 per square foot on a net basis. The range is generally a function of size and floor. Quoted tenant improvement allowances range from $10.00 to $60.00. All new deals include $0.50 per square foot or 3% annual escalations and free rent ranging between three and twelve months. On December 17, 2012 125 S Wacker Drive sold to MetLife Inc. for total consideration of $107 million, or approximately $207 per square foot. Based on a net operating income of $14.97 per square foot, the overall capitalization rate on this transaction is 7.25%.
OFFICE SALE No. 3CommentsThis comparable represents a Class A multi-tenant office building built in 1982. It is located in the West Loop submarket within the Chicago CBD. It is located on the southeast corner of Madison and Wacker Drive. Some major amenities to this building are banking services, sundry store, food court, restaurant and travel agency. The estimated 2011 pass through expenses are $11.27. The property is currently 79% occupied and there is both direct and sublet space available in the building ranging in price from $24.00 per square foot on a gross basis to between $15.00 and $20.00 per square foot on a triple net basis. Recent leasing at this property includes a new lease with Hayes for 10,745 square feet for a 10-year term with base rent of $18.00 on a triple net basis with 8-months of rent abatement and $50.00 in tenant improvements. This lease also includes 3.0% annual rent escalations. Additionally, Crum & Forster leased 17,198 square feet for 15 years at $15.50 per square foot with 13 months abated and 3.0% per year increases. The tenant improvement allowance provided is $81.00 per square foot.The building sold to Harbor Group International on December 6, 2012 for a reported $221 million or $184.91 per square foot. Based on an in-place net operating income of $14.3 million the in-place capitalization rate would be 6.47%.The property was approximately 80% occupied at the time of the sale.
OFFICE SALE No. 4300 West Adams BuildingLocation DataLocation: 300 West Adams Street
Chicago, IL 60606
County: Cook
Parcel No: 17-16-208-015-0000
Atlas Ref:
Physical DataType: Multi Tenant
Land Area: 0.690 Acres
Gross Building Area: 283,600 SF
Net Rentable Area: 252,857 SF
Usable Bldg Area: 252,857 SF
Year Built: 1928, Renovated 2008
No. of Stories 12
Parking: None
Condition: Average
Exterior Walls: Masonry
Class: B
Amenities: On-site restaurant, convenience store, full service bank, salon
Sales DataTransaction Type: Sale
Date: 9/2012
Marketing Time: 3 Months
Grantor: Sterling Bay Companies
Grantee: The Shidler Group
Document No.:
Sale Price: $51,000,000
Financing: Market Terms
Cash Eq. Price: $51,000,000
Req. Capital Cost: $0
Adj. Sale Price: $51,000,000
Verification: Broker; News Publication
Financial DataSource: Broker
Occupancy at Sale: 93.20%
Based On: Existing Income
Total Per SF
Potential Gross Inc: $6,366,939 $25.18
Vacancy & Credit Loss: $0 $0.00
Effective Gross Inc: $6,366,939 $25.18
Expenses & Reserves: $2,379,384 $9.41
Net Operating Inc: $3,987,555 $15.77
AnalysisUnderwriting Criteria: Price Per S.F.
Overall Cap Rate (OAR): 7.82%
Projected IRR: 0.00%
Eff Gross Inc Mult (EGIM):
8.01
Op Exp Ratio (OER): 37.37%
Price Per SF: $201.70
CommentsThis 12-story Class B building is located adjacent east of the Willis Tower at the corner of Adams and Franklin Streets. The property was originally constructed in 1928 and was most recently renovated in 2008. The building contains 252,857 square feet of rentable area over its 12 stories. The property is currently 93.2% leased with and asking rent ranging from of $26.50 per square foot on a gross base year basis. The most recent leases signed at the property have ranged from $23.00 to $24.50 per square foot gross (base year) and have included 6 months of free rent.
The property was sold to The Shidler Group in August 2012 for consideration of $51,000,000, or about $202 per square foot. The seller, Sterling Bay Companies, previously purchased the property in 2007 for $23,000,000 or just under $100 per square foot at the height of the real estate boom. A $13 million dollar renovation in 2008, Historical Landmark attainment in 2009, and 30% increase in occupancy were all contributing factors allowing Sterling Bay to sell the asset for twice the amount it paid. Based on in place income, the overall capitalization rate on this transaction would be approximately equal to 7.82%.
OFFICE SALE No. 5Comments200 North LaSalle represents a 645,170-square foot, 30-story, Class A/A- CBD office building located at 200 N. LaSalle Street in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. The tower was designed by the firm of Perkins and Will and completed in 1984. The building is situated on a .763-acre site at the northwest corner of LaSalle and Lake Street. Between 2007 and 2011 the office underwent renovations which included upgrades/improvements to the Lobby, HVAC systems, elevators and office common areas. In total over $830,000 was invested into the property since 2008. At the time of the transaction the property was 65.4% occupied and considered to be in good overall condition. The subject's notable tenants are CareerBuilder (155,350 square feet), Level 3 Communications (43,611 square feet) and InterPark Holdings (26,893 square feet). The property is recognizable by the unique floor plate which can be configured to contain up to ten corner offices. The floors also benefit from abundant light allowed in by the large floor to ceiling windows. Additionally, the location of the subject at the north end of the Central Loop provides immediate access to public transportation and the government campus. In April 2012 Onni Group, a Canadian real estate investment firm, purchased the asset for consideration of $101,000,000 or approximately $157 per square foot. The purchaser was attracted to the property given the prestigious location on LaSalle Street and the ability to acquire a core plus asset with high upside potential for well under replacement cost. The sale is also significant in for the Chicago office market given that it is the first sale of a significant “value add” asset within the CBD that attracted bids and closed at a per square foot price well above similar recent sales with similar occupancy levels. Based on in place income, the capitalization rate on this sale was 5.85%, while the pro forma OAR was 8.73%.
OFFICE SALE No. 6500 North MichiganLocation DataLocation: 500 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, IL 60611
County: Cook
Parcel No: 10-34-122-006-0000
Atlas Ref:
Physical DataType: Multi Tenant
Land Area: 0.455 Acres
Gross Building Area: 380,000 SF
Net Rentable Area: 322,443 SF
Usable Bldg Area: 322,443 SF
Year Built: 1968, Renovated in 1990.
No. of Stories 24
Parking: Covered
Condition: Good
Exterior Walls: Glass
Class: A-
Amenities: 24 hour manned security, close proximity to area shopping, restaurants, and hotels, a newly remodeled and expanded lobby, a state-of-the-art life safety system, and in-building parking. Printing services on-site, federal express on-site, and a sundry store on-site.
OFFICE SALE No. 6Comments500 North Michigan Avenue represents a 24-story, Class A- office building completed in 1968. The property totals 322,443 square feet of rentable area with approximately 14,500 square foot average floorplates. The office is located on “The Magnificent Mile” in Chicago’s famed shopping district. This property is currently 85% leased with asking rental rates varying between $26.00 and $33.00 per square foot gross. The most recent lease available was signed in December 2012 for 1,721 square feet at $24.50 per square foot gross. This lease also included $0.50 bumps across the 2-year term. In February 2012 the property was sold for $70,925,000 or approximately $220 per square foot to The Macerich Corporation. At the time of the sale the building was 86.1% leased. The reported cap rate on the transaction was 6.6%. Both the buyer and the seller had been or are reportedly considering joining the office building with the neighboring retail shops at 600 North Michigan Avenue via a bridge over the public alley. Additionally there have been reports of plans to expand the lower level retail beyond the current floor plan however this has not been verified.
Date Size (SF) Tenant Rent (PSF) TI (PSF) Free Rent (Months)
Escalation Term (Yrs)
4/1/2012 3,932 IPXI $18.00 $0.00 4 $0.50 5.00
11/1/2012 84,043 Chicago Title & Trust Co. $29.00 $5.00 8 $0.50 7.00
Recent Leases
CommentsThis building is located at the southwest corner of LaSalle Street and Madison Street, in the Central Loop office submarket. The comparable is known as Chase Plaza and is located a 10 S LaSalle Street in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. The property contains 733,633 square feet of net rentable area and is 37 stories in height. The building was constructed in 1986 and operates as a Class A/B building within the Central Loop submarket of the Chicago CBD. The typical floor size is about 21,000 square feet. The leasing agent indicated a full work letter would be provided for the small amount of raw space available, the building is currently 84.7% occupied asking for $16.00 to $18.00 per square foot on a NNN basis. The most recently signed lease was for 84,043 square feet to the Chicago Board & Trust Company for occupancy November 2012. The lease was signed for a 7-year term with $5.00 per square foot tenant improvements and $0.50 annual rent escalations.
Comments222 North LaSalle Office is located at the southwest corner of North LaSalle Street and West Wacker Drive in the Central Loop submarket in downtown Chicago. The building was originally developed in 1927 and completely redeveloped in 1986 (including the addition of four floors). The redevelopment thoroughly restored and updated the building with modern facilities, amenities, elegant granite, glass, and an aluminum office tower. The building's overall height increased from 22 to 26 stories. The additional four stories (22nd-26th) are penthouse floors spanning the entire complex. The building features include six individual atriums, indoor parking, computer controlled energy management system, conference center with four rooms, manned security, Chicago River views and a courier. 222 North LaSalle has 938,314 square feet of net rentable area and is currently 88.4% leased. The largest tenants include Hinshaw & Cubertson (304,000 square feet), Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz PC (180,405 square feet) and Merrill Lynch (78,974 square feet).
CommentsThis class A multitenant office building is located at 180 North LaSalle Street (located at the southwest corner of North LaSalle Street and West Lake Street) in the Central Loop submarket of downtown Chicago, Illinois. The property contains a total of 770,191 square feet of rentable area across 38 stories. Currently the property is 90% leased with asking rent on the vacant office space ranging from $14.00 to $18.00 per square foot on a NNN basis. The office building was developed in 1971, renovated in 1999, and is situated upon a 0.76 acre site (33,106 square feet). The most recent lease available at the property was signed in October 2011 for 18,832 square feet of space over an 11 year term. The lease included 13 months of gross rent abatement, $35.00 per square foot in tenant improvements and $0.50 annual rent bumps.
Date Size (SF) Tenant Rent (PSF) TI (PSF) Free Rent (Months)
Escalation Term (Yrs)
4/1/2011 7,580 Kravolec & Marquard Chart
$17.00 $20.00 5.00
1/1/2011 6,253 American Diabetes Associa
$18.00 $0.00 $0.50 5.00
Recent Leases
CommentsThis comparable represents a Class A office building located in the Central Loop office submarket. The building was designed by Helmut Jahn and was completed in 1981. The original design for the project called another twin tower to be constructed at Clark and Monroe however this plan was never completed. The property features 807,822 square feet of net rentable area across the 40 floors. According to the property manager the building is currently 74% leased with asking rates for the vacant space between $17.00 to $19.50 per square foot on a triple net basis. The property was renovated in 2002, which included upgrades to the lobby, elevators and common areas. Although the renovations helped update the property, the office has been known to have compromised window lines as the lines along the north façade are much higher and allow less sunlight. In April 2011 a 7,580 square foot lease with base rent of $17.00 on a triple net basis over a 5-year term was signed. This lease included $20.00 in tenant improvements and 8-months of rent abatement. Additionally a 6,253 square foot lease was signed in January 2011 for $18.00 per square foot on a triple net basis with $18.00 in tenant improvements and $0.50 annual bumps over a 5-year term. The property sold for $136,000,000 or $168.35 per square foot in December 2011. The building was purchased by Chicago based real estate investment firm Hearn Co. The overall capitalization rate for this transaction is 7.33% based on a net operating income of $9,967,145 or $12.34 per square foot.
CommentsMadison Plaza is a 915,247 SF, 45-story, Class-A multi-tenant office building, built in 1982. It is located on the northwest corner of Wells and Madison in Chicago’s West Loop office submarket. Major amenities to this building include conference facility, food service and close proximity to public transportation, securities trading centers, retail and dining facilities and cultural institutions. At the time of survey, this comparable was 89% occupied. Asking are between $17.00 to $25.00 per square foot on a triple net basis over a five to ten year term. Typically 2.5% annual escalations are included in the leases. The most recent lease information available was for a renewal of 46,787 square feet for a 5-year term. This lease was signed with base rent of $22.50 on a triple net basis with 2.5% annual escalations. Additionally the lease included $18.75 per square with 6 months of gross rent abatement.
Comments230 West Monroe Office Building is a Class B, 29-story office tower located at the northeast corner of Monroe and Franklin Streets in the Central Loop submarket of downtown Chicago, Illinois. The office building was developed in 1971, renovated in 2003, and situated upon a 0.41 acre site. The property contains 623,524 square feet of net rentable area and is 88% leased. The asking rental rate ranges from $16.00 to $19.50 per square foot on a net basis over a five- to ten-year term. Operating expenses are estimated to be $12.77 per square foot. A recent lease was signed with Allison Slutsky & Kennedy for 5,603 square feet at $16.50 per square foot on a net basis. This is a renewal lease that commences 8/2012 and was signed in January 2011. The lease is for 53 months and tenant improvement allowance of $11.00 per square foot was provided. In addition, the lease includes seven months of free rent and calls for $0.50 annual rent bumps. The building sold to JV (Lincoln Property & Pacific Investment Mgmt.) on August 10, 2012 for total consideration of $91.3 million, or $146 per square foot. The property was 90% occupied at the time of the sale. Based on a net operating income of $12.74 per square foot, the overall capitalization rate on this transaction is 8.70%.
Property Description Name: 2 North LaSalle Address: 2 N. LaSalle Street Address2: City: Chicago State: IL Zip: 60603 Country: US Portfolio: Property Type: Office & Retail Property Reference: Property Version:
Property Timing Analysis Start Date: 10/13Reporting Start Date: 10/13Years to Report or End Date: 10
Area Measures
Label Area
Property Size 694,336 SqFt Alt. Prop. Size 1 SqFt
General Inflation Inflation Month: Analysis Start Reimbursement Method: Fiscal reimbursement using fiscal inflation
Tenant Name/ Lease Start Term/ Base/Min Unit of Rent Rtl Reimbur- Unit of No. Description Suite Type Lease Status Total Area Date Expir Rent Measure Chng Sls sements Measure Rent Abatement
Lease Total Date Begin #/Size Crte Term/ Base/Min Unit of Rent Rtl Reimbur- Unit of No. Space Description Type Lease Status Area Avail Lsng Leases Lses Expir Rent Measure Chng Sls sements Measure
Property Resale Option: Capitalize Net Operating IncomeCap Rate: 7.5Resale Adjustment(s): 1Apply Rate to following year income: YesCalculate Resale for All Years: Yes
Present Value DiscountingPrimary Discount Rate: 8.25Discount Rate Range Number of Rates: 5 Increment: 0.25Discount Method: Annually (Endpoint on Cash Flow & Resale) Secondary Discount Timing
Recent Performance. Fiscal tightening has slowed Chicago’s recovery and downside risk has increased. Though CHI is not overly exposed to spending cuts under federal sequestration, tax hikes are packing more of a punch because household balance sheets have been slower to improve. Delinquency rates are above average on most loan types, limiting households’ flexibility to absorb the hit from higher taxes. Retail and leisure/hospitality employment is underperform-ing that of the nation by the largest margin since the recovery began. Slower healing in construction and state and local government is also hurting. A linger-ing foreclosure problem continues to weigh on home-building, while soaring state pension costs are divert-ing money away from other government operations.
Prospects. Recent trends in the economy bear the imprint of unusual weather patterns and should be partly discounted. Because the winter held on much longer than usual, businesses that add seasonal help in the spring delayed hiring, driving down employment. It would be a mistake to ignore the softness in the job market altogether, however. Help from housing, which has cushioned the effects of fiscal tightening and slowing in export-sensitive industries nationally, has been notably absent in CHI. Housing-related em-ployment was down 1% on a year-ago basis in the first quarter, compared with a 2% rise nationally.
Housing’s contribution to growth will increase next year as foreclosure inventories decline. Illinois’ backlog of distress properties is not as large as those of other states with similarly slow foreclosure pro-cesses. With fewer seriously delinquent new loans, new foreclosure filings in CHI have receded re-cently. Foreclosure filings per 1,000 households are more than twice the national average but are the lowest in five years and down sharply since the fall.
Finance. Financial services are regaining momen-tum and the outlook is brighter than it was a few months ago. Health insurers have been hiring ag-
gressively as they look to capitalize on the expanding market for government-backed Medicare plans, and securities firms and financial exchanges are about to go on the offensive. CME logged its biggest trading day ever in late May as traders looked to hedge inter-est rates, and the company has also benefited from volume gains in its energy contracts and demand for its new swap-clearing services. Banks have shifted their focus from cutting costs to growing as demand for credit improves. A higher than average share of the state’s banks are losing money, but this is mis-leading because smaller banks could bolster profits by releasing loan loss reserves. Small banks in the region have been more reluctant to lend because of regula-tory uncertainty and low appraisals of commercial real estate, according to the Fed’s latest Beige Book.
Autos. CHI would be in worse shape if not for the resurgent auto industry, which should ensure that growth in manufacturing payrolls resumes in the second half of the year. Ford’s South Side as-sembly plant is operating at capacity and will shut for only one week this summer because of strong demand. Federal tax increases have had little effect on auto sales, which are benefiting from replace-ment demand, a strong product cycle with new en-ergy-efficient vehicles, and increased availability of auto financing. Transportation equipment produc-ers have increased payrolls by 50% from the bot-tom in mid-2009, the most of any factory segment.
The soft patch will give way to modestly stron-ger growth before long, but Chicago will not close the performance gap with the nation un-til 2015 when housing is firing on all cylinders. Longer term, a large talent pool, central location, vast transportation network, and superior access to capital will work in CHI’s favor, but middling population trends will constrain expansion.
Aaron D. SmithJune 2013
dataBuffet® mSa code: dmCHI
chIcago
236 4th quintile
229 3rd quintile
101% 104%
98% 178
StrengthS ● Business and tourism center of Midwest. ● Huge talent pool; strong roster of well-regarded educational institutions.
● Budding high-tech center in River North neighborhood.
WeaKneSSeS ● Poor state and local fiscal health. ● Housing burdened by high foreclosures. ● Old and aging infrastructure. ● Weak population growth.
UPSIde ● Second incubator for high-tech firms proves as successful as the first.
● Wrigley Field and Navy Pier makeovers help city meet ambitious tourism goals.
Sector % of Total Employment Average Annual Earnings
Due to U.S.
Most Diverse (U.S.)
Least Diverse
Source: FHFA, 1996Q1=100, NSA
MiningConstructionManufacturing Durable NondurableTransportation/UtilitiesWholesale TradeRetail TradeInformationFinancial ActivitiesProf. and Bus. ServicesEduc. and Health ServicesLeisure and Hosp. ServicesOther ServicesGovernment
MOODY’S RATING
Not due to U.S.
MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis U.S. Metro / Midwest / June 2013 29
Sources: IRS (top), 2010; Census Bureau, 2012
Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics, 2012
2012
Sources: Percent of total employment — Moody’s Analytics & BLS, 2012; Average annual earnings — BEA, 2011
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2011
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
98%
CHI U.S.
100109
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0.81
-30,000
-25,000
-20,000
-15,000-10,000
-5,000
0
09 10 11 12
Net Migration, CHInet mIgratIon, chI
CHI IL U.S.
46,153 43,721 41,560
CHI U.S.
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
98 01 04 07 10 13
coUntyaS oF nov 05, 2012aa3
Into chIcago, IL nUmBer oF mIgrantS
Lake County, IL 11,136Gary, IN 5,306New York, NY 2,924Rockford, IL 2,651Los Angeles, CA 2,126Phoenix, AZ 2,109Milwaukee, WI 2,078Minneapolis, MN 1,941Warren, MI 1,829Atlanta, GA 1,753Total In-migration 115,095
From chIcago, ILLake County, IL 12,763Gary, IN 8,277Phoenix, AZ 3,279New York, NY 3,246Rockford, IL 2,758Houston, TX 2,614Los Angeles, CA 2,563Atlanta, GA 2,542Dallas, TX 2,424Milwaukee, WI 2,105Total Out-migration 146,184
net migration -31,089
gvSL State & Local Government 416.07225 Restaurants and other eating places 222.55613 Employment services 142.36221 General medical and surgical hospitals 141.85511 Management of companies and enterprises 74.76113 Colleges; universities; and professional schools 70.15221 Depository credit intermediation 61.94451 Grocery stores 61.45617 Services to buildings and dwellings 56.05415 Computer systems design and related services 54.56211 Offices of physicians 54.25416 Mgmt; scientific; & tech. consul. serv. 53.8gvF Federal Government 47.34521 Department stores 45.86241 Individual and family services 44.9
High-tech employment 169.8As % of total employment 4.5
Foreclosure inventory per 1,000 households, Jun 2012, NSA
0 2 4 6 8 10
Wages and salaries
Insurance
Procurement contracts
Insured loans
Grants
Retirement and disability
Chicago U.S.
Federal Fiscal Drag Is Manageable
Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics
Federal, % of gross metro product, 2010
CHI would be in far worse shape if not for rapid growth in busi-ness/professional services, which has accounted for all of the metro division’s job gains this year. Earlier in the recovery the standout performer was administrative and support services as cautious busi-nesses sought out temporary help to meet demand. More recently, industry growth has been powered by workforce additions at tech and science-based companies and headquarters operations. A second incubator for startup technology firms, this one focusing on biotech and pharmaceutical companies, is in the works.
For decades the suburbs have been the preferred home to young families in CHI, with Cook County consistently trailing the rest of the metro division in population growth. But in recent years the urban core has become the new economic engine as more jobs downtown attract residents to move nearby, prompting additional companies such as Motorola Mobility to join the inward migra-tion. The recentralization in demographics is expected to continue in the near term, but the city’s violent crime and poor schools will pose a challenge once the 20-somethings start having children.
Revenues Rise, but Government Remains a Drag
Sources: Census Bureau, BLS, Moody’s Analytics
410
415
420
425
430
435
-15-10-505
1015202530
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
Chicago state and local government employment, ths (R)
About Moody’s AnalyticsEconomic & Consumer Credit Analytics
Moody’s Analytics helps capital markets and credit risk management professionals worldwide respond to an evolving marketplace with confi dence. Through its team of economists, Moody’s Analytics is a leading independent provider of data, analysis, modeling and forecasts on national and regional economies, fi nancial markets, and credit risk.
Moody’s Analytics tracks and analyzes trends in consumer credit and spending, output and income, mortgage activity, popu-lation, central bank behavior, and prices. Our customized models, concise and timely reports, and one of the largest assembled fi nancial, economic and demographic databases support fi rms and policymakers in strategic planning, product and sales fore-casting, credit risk and sensitivity management, and investment research. Our customers include multinational corporations, governments at all levels, central banks and fi nancial regulators, retailers, mutual funds, fi nancial institutions, utilities, residen-tial and commercial real estate fi rms, insurance companies, and professional investors.
Our web periodicals and special publications cover every U.S. state and metropolitan area; countries throughout Europe, Asia and the Americas; the world’s major cities; and the U.S. housing market and other industries. From our offi ces in the U.S., the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic and Australia, we provide up-to-the-minute reporting and analysis on the world’s ma-jor economies.
Moody’s Analytics added Economy.com to its portfolio in 2005. Now called Economic & Consumer Credit Analytics, this arm is based in West Chester PA, a suburb of Philadelphia, with offi ces in London, Prague and Sydney. More information is available at www.economy.com.
CBRE, Inc. - Valuation and Advisory Services 700 Commerce Drive, Suite 550
Oak Brook, IL 60523 (630) 368-5531
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Business – Real Estate Administration, Indiana University – Bloomington, IN
CERTIFICATION State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser: State of Illinois (No. 553-000226) Licensed Real Estate Broker: State of Illinois (No. 475090543)
PROFESSIONAL
Designated Member, Appraisal Institute (MAI), Certificate No. 10314 Certified Commercial Investment Member (CCIM), Certificate No. 10820
EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE 2011 – Present CBRE, Inc. Chicago, IL Director 2007 - 2010 Rubicon Advisory, LLC Chicago, IL Director 2003 - 2007 Allstate Investments, LLC Northbrook, IL Senior Manager – Appraisals 1999 - 2003 Integra Realty Resources Chicago, IL Managing Director 1994 – 1999 Nunnink & Associates, Inc. Chicago, IL Regional Manager 1991 – 1994 Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. Chicago, IL 1983 – 1991 Joseph J. Blake & Associates Houston, TX – Chicago, IL J. Scott Patrick has 25+ years of commercial real estate valuation experience. Based predominantly in Chicago, Mr. Patrick has completed assignments across the United States with primary focus on institutional-grade, retail and office properties. In addition to most types of retail and office properties, Mr. Patrick has a wide range of experience analyzing and appraising real estate assets such as:
GSA leased office and industrial properties, including specialty assets occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Secret Service, Joint Forces Task Force Command, Homeland Security, Internal Revenue Service, and the Drug Enforcement Agency.
Industrial properties including distribution, light and heavy manufacturing, office/warehouse (low to high finish), and truck terminals.
EDUCATIONAL Bachelors of Science Degree, Business – Real Estate Administration Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
CERTIFICATION State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser: State of Michigan (No. 1201003343) State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser: State of Illinois (No. 553.001947) State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser: State of Indiana (No. CG-40801085)
PROFESSIONAL Designated Member, Appraisal Institute (MAI), Member No. 37831 Member of the Commercial Investment Real Estate Institute (CCIM), Certificate No. 11264
EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE 1987-1994 Oetzel-Hanton-Williams, Inc. Appraiser Troy, MI 1994-1994 National Realty Advisors
Senior Appraiser Troy, MI 1994-1996 Laurencelle Appraisal Company Senior Appraiser Birmingham, MI 1996-2004 Bank One Inc. Vice President Detroit, MI 2004-2008 CB Richard Ellis, Inc Managing Director Southfield, MI 2008-Present CB Richard Ellis, Inc Managing Director Chicago, IL Valuation assignments included all types of existing as well as proposed commercial, industrial, multiple-family residential and special purpose properties throughout the mid-west, including apartments, office buildings, industrial manufacturing and warehouse facilities, shopping centers, restaurants, hotels, motels, manufactured home communities and a wide variety of investment and special purpose properties and unimproved land. In addition I have testified as an Expert Witness for US Bankruptcy court.