UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 19 DEACONESS HOSPITAL and Case 19-CA-119686 VALLEY HOSPITAL and Case 19-CA-119701 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1199NW, CTW-CLC ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES, CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND NOTICE OF HEARING Pursuant to § 102.33 of the Rules and Regulations of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") and to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, IT IS ORDERED THAT Case 19-CA-119686, which is based on a charge filed by Service Employees International Union, Local 1199NW, CTVV-CLC (the "Union"), against Deaconess Hospital ("Respondent-Deaconess"), and Case 19-CA-119701, which is based on a charge filed by the Union against Valley Hospital ("Respondent-Valley"), are consolidated. This Order Consolidating Cases, Consolidated Complaint and Notice of Hearing, which is based on these charges, is issued pursuant to § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (the "Act"), 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., and § 102.15 of the Board's Rules and Regulations and alleges Respondent-Deaconess and Respondent-Valley (jointly "Respondents") have violated the Act as described below.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
REGION 19
DEACONESS HOSPITAL
and Case 19-CA-119686
VALLEY HOSPITAL
and Case 19-CA-119701
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1199NW, CTW-CLC
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES, CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND NOTICE OF HEARING
Pursuant to § 102.33 of the Rules and Regulations of the National Labor
Relations Board (the "Board") and to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, IT IS
ORDERED THAT Case 19-CA-119686, which is based on a charge filed by Service
Employees International Union, Local 1199NW, CTVV-CLC (the "Union"), against
Deaconess Hospital ("Respondent-Deaconess"), and Case 19-CA-119701, which is
based on a charge filed by the Union against Valley Hospital ("Respondent-Valley"), are
consolidated.
This Order Consolidating Cases, Consolidated Complaint and Notice of
Hearing, which is based on these charges, is issued pursuant to § 10(b) of the National
Labor Relations Act (the "Act"), 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., and § 102.15 of the Board's
Rules and Regulations and alleges Respondent-Deaconess and Respondent-Valley
(jointly "Respondents") have violated the Act as described below.
1.
(a) The charge in Case 19-CA-119686 was filed by the Union on
December 23, 2013, and a copy was served by regular mail on Respondent-Deaconess
on December 27, 2013.
(b) The charge in Case 19-CA-119701 was filed by the Union on
December 23, 2013, and a copy was served by regular mail on Respondent-Valley on
December 27, 2013.
2.
(a) At all material times, both Respondents have been State of
Delaware corporations, each with an office and place of business in Spokane,
Washington (respectively, "Respondent-Deaconess' facility" and "Respondent-Valley's
facility"), and have been operating hospitals providing inpatient and outpatient medical
care as affiliates and/or subsidiaries of Community Health Care, Inc. ("CHS"), a State of
Delaware corporation engaged in operating hospitals throughout the United States.
(b) In conducting each of their operations described above in
paragraph 2(a), each of Respondents, during the past 12 months, have derived gross
revenues in excess of $250,000.
(c) During the period of time described above in paragraph 2(b), each
of Respondents have purchased and received at their respective facilities goods valued
in excess of $50,000 directly from points located outside the State of Washington.
(d) At all material times, Respondents have been employers engaged
in commerce within the meaning of §§ 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act and health care
institutions within the meaning of § 2(14) of the Act.
2
3.
At all material times, the Union has been a labor organization within the
meaning of § 2(5) of the Act.
4.
(a) At all material times, the following individuals held the positions set
forth opposite their names and have been supervisors of Respondent-Deaconess
and/or Respondent-Valley within the meaning of § 2(11) of the Act and/or agents of
Respondent-Deaconess and/or Respondent-Valley within the meaning of § 2(13) of the
Act:
Jan Ellis
Holy Emery
Melinda Moore
Tim Moran
Rod Schumacher --
Carol Torpey
CHS Regional Human Resources Manager
Respondent-Valley Unit Manager
Respondent-Deaconess Human Resource
Manager
Respondent-Valley Chief Executive Officer
Respondent-Deaconess Interim Chief
Executive Officer
Respondent-Valley Chief Nursing Officer
(b) At all material times, an unnamed agent held the position of
Respondents' chief spokesperson during collective-bargaining negotiations between the
Union and each of Respondents, and has been an agent of Respondents within the
meaning of § 2(13) of the Act.
3
5.
(a) The service employees of Respondent-Deaconess (the
"Deaconess Service Unit") employed in the positions set forth in Appendix A-Deaconess
Service Unit annexed hereto and incorporated by reference constitute a unit appropriate
for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of § 9(b) of the Act.
(b) The technical employees of Respondent-Deaconess (the
"Deaconess Technical Unit") employed in the positions set forth in Appendix A-
Deaconess Technical Unit annexed hereto and incorporated by reference constitute a
unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of § 9(b) of
the Act.
(c) The service employees of Respondent-Valley (the "Valley Service
Unit") employed in the positions set forth in Appendix A-Valley Service Unit annexed
hereto and incorporated by reference constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of
collective bargaining within the meaning of § 9(b) of the Act.
(d) The technical employees of Respondent-Valley (the "Valley
Technical Unit") employed in the positions set forth in Appendix A-Valley Technical Unit
annexed hereto and incorporated by reference constitute a unit appropriate for the
purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of § 9(b) of the Act.
(e) The registered nurses of Respondent-Valley (the "Valley RN Unit")
employed in the positions set forth in Appendix A-Valley RN Unit annexed hereto and
incorporated by reference constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective
bargaining within the meaning of § 9(b) of the Act.
4
(f) Since at least October 1, 2008, and at all material times,
Respondent-Deaconess has recognized the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the Deaconess Service Unit and Deaconess Technical Unit
(collectively, the "Deaconess Units"). This recognition has been embodied in
successive collective-bargaining agreements, the most recent of which were effective
from August 1, 2010, to April [sic] 31, 2013, in the Deaconess Service Unit and August
1, 2010, to July 31, 2013, in the Deaconess Technical Unit.
(g) Since at least October 1, 2008, and at all material times,
Respondent-Valley has recognized the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the Valley Service Unit, Valley Technical Unit, and Valley RN Unit
(collectively, the "Valley Units"). This recognition has been embodied in successive
collective-bargaining agreements, the most recent of which were effective from August
1, 2010, to April [sic] 31, 2013, in the Valley Service Unit, August 1, 2010, to July 31,
2013, in the Valley Technical Unit, and August 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, in the
Valley RN Unit.
(h) At all material times, based on § 9(a) of the Act, the Union has
been the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the Deaconess and Valley
Units.
6.
(a) From 6:00 a.m. on December 4, 2013, to 5:59 a.m. on December 5,
2013, certain Unit employees of Respondents ceased work concertedly and engaged in
a strike (the "Strike").
5
(b) In advance of the Strike, on November 22, 2013, the Union, by
hand-delivered letters and on behalf of the striking employees, notified Respondents of
the strikers' intent to return to their former positions of employment after the strike
ended at 5:59,a.m. on December 5, 2013.
(c) Consistent with the letters referenced above in paragraph 6(b), on
December 4, 2013, the Union, by hand-delivered letters to Respondents, made
unconditional offers to return to work, on behalf of the striking employees, to their former
positions of employment, effective after 5:59 a.m. on December 5, 2013.
(d) From 6:00 a.m. on December 5, 2013, to 5:59 a.m. on December 7,
2013, Respondent-Valley failed and refused to reinstate its employees who engaged in
the Strike to their former positions of employment.
(e) Respondent-Valley engaged in the conduct described above in
paragraph 6(d) because the named striking employees of Respondent-Valley formed,
joined, and/or assisted the Union and/or engaged in concerted activities, and/or to
discourage employees from engaging in these and/or other Union or protected,
concerted activities.
7.
(a) On May 15, 2014, the Union requested, by hand-delivered letter,
that Respondents furnish the Union with the following information pertaining to the
Deaconess and Valley Units: "The total bargaining unit payroll for 2011, 2012 and 2013
year-to-date, including the specific dollar amounts for each of the following cost areas in
Microsoft Excel: a) Regular wages; b) Overtime wages; c) Charge differential; d)
Anesthetist and Nurse Technician, all other employees employed by [Respondent-
Valley] at the above location, all employees employed by [Respondent-Valley] at other
locations, all employees employed at [Respondent-Valley's] urgent care clinics, all
managerial employees, all confidential employees, all service and maintenance
employees, all physicians, all other professional employees, all technical employees, all
skilled maintenance employees, all business office clerical employees, all assistant unit
managers, and guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
16
APPENDIX B
October 2, 2013
Information Request for RN, Service and Technical Bargaining units at Valley and Deaconess Hospitals.
Dear Mr. Carmody:
On behalf of SEIU Healthcare 1199NW, I am requesting the following information necessary for representation of our members and to fulfill our duty of representation in this bargain.
1. Copies of workers compensation claims filed for the period 2010 to date. Provide documents showing what claims were approved and compensable, and what claims were denied as well as days lost and other workers compensation data maintained by the Hospital.
2. For the period 2010 to date, written workplace violence prevention programs and related policies.
3. Current workplace violence prevention policies related to a. Restraint and seclusion b. Acuity assessment and supervision of patients c. Emergency codes and procedures d. Staffing e. Environment of care
5. Data for 2010 to date for the following: a. WSHA Injury and illness logs, including but not limited to OSHA 300 and all incident reports b. Patient incident data c. Any data reports or analyses showing experience and trends of safety issues
6. The current form used by employees to report a patient assault or other assault.
7. For the period 2010 to date, information about all committees that play a role in workplace violence prevention, the framework under which they operate, and copies of their minutes and any important projects they have conducted or are conducting relevant to workplace violence prevention.
8. For the period 2008 to date, any Joint Commission reports as well as notices of deficiency, grievances, and notices of violation that relate to workplace violence and safety.
9. The Annual Safety Plan. Please send the plans for 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013.
10. The violence prevention plan. Please provide any and all training provided related to this plan, the minutes and sign in sheets for these trainings, as well as the materials provided in such trainings.
11. Provide the current written accident prevention program.
12. Provide minutes from the safety committee for the period January 1, 2010 to date.
13. Provide a copy of the written Chemical Hazard Communication Program.
14. For the period 2010 to present, provide the written workplace assessment of the entire hospital to determine if hazards are present, or likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. Provide the assessment and the training and other evidence of implementation of such safety precautions.
15. Provide a copy of the Emergency Response Plan for the hospital.
16. What areas in the Hospital have employees mixing hazardous chemicals. Do those areas have emergency washing facilities, and if so, identify the specific locations of those emergency washing facilities.
17. Provide all records for 2010-2013 to date of occupational injuries and illnesses.
18. Provide a copy of the bloodbome pathogens Exposure Control Plan.
19. Provide the following documents pertaining to Safety Lifting: a. The names and job titles of the safe patient handling committee b. The safe patient handling program c. The safe patient handling policy for all shifts and units of the hospital d. The patient handling hazard assessment. e. The process to identify the appropriate use of the safe patient handling policy based
on the patient's physical and medical condition and the availability of lifting equipment or lift teams;
f. Copies from 2010 to date of the annual performance evaluation of the program to determine its effectiveness
g. list of lifts and their specific location in the hospital. Identify how many lifts there are for acute care available inpatient beds.
Ii. Training on policies, equipment and devises provided 2009 to date, and the list of employees trained and the date of the training and the materials provided at such training.
i. Procedures for hospital employees to refuse to perform or be involved in patient handling or movement that the hospital employee believes in good faith will expose a
patient or a hospital employee to an unacceptable risk of injury. Note: A hospital employee who in good faith follows the procedure developed by the hospital in accordance with this subsection shall not be the subject of disciplinary action by the hospital for the refusal to perform or be involved in the patient handling or movement.
Please provide this information no later than October 28, 2013.
Thank you for your attention to this. Please 03 II me if you have any questions or need clarification on any item.
Sincerely,
Emily Van Bronkhorst Executive Vice President SEW Healthcare 1199NW