Top Banner
Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in Determining the Solar Heat Gain Use in Determining the Solar Heat Gain Coefficients and U Coefficients and U - - Factors of Complex Factors of Complex Glazing Systems Research Project Glazing Systems Research Project NFRC Project Number: NFRC Project Number: 07 07 - - 101 101 - - RP RP September 14, 2011 September 14, 2011 Final Presentation Final Presentation William C. duPont/Sunergy Consulting William C. duPont/Sunergy Consulting W. Ross McCluney/Sun Pine Consulting W. Ross McCluney/Sun Pine Consulting
42

Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Aug 26, 2018

Download

Documents

tranhuong
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in Determining the Solar Heat Gain Use in Determining the Solar Heat Gain Coefficients and UCoefficients and U--Factors of Complex Factors of Complex

Glazing Systems Research ProjectGlazing Systems Research Project

NFRC Project Number: NFRC Project Number: 0707--101101--RPRP

September 14, 2011September 14, 2011Final PresentationFinal Presentation

William C. duPont/Sunergy ConsultingWilliam C. duPont/Sunergy Consulting

W. Ross McCluney/Sun Pine ConsultingW. Ross McCluney/Sun Pine Consulting

Page 2: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

PresentationPresentationBackgroundBackgroundProject Objectives and TasksProject Objectives and TasksRecommendationsRecommendations

Frit GlazingFrit GlazingIndoor ScreensIndoor ScreensIndoor Venetian BlindsIndoor Venetian BlindsVenetian Blinds Between GlazingVenetian Blinds Between GlazingOutdoor ScreensOutdoor Screens

Intermission Intermission (5 Minutes)(5 Minutes)Analysis of All Test SpecimensAnalysis of All Test SpecimensConclusions Conclusions Project ChallengesProject ChallengesFuture Analysis and ResearchFuture Analysis and Research

Page 3: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

BackgroundBackground

WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 have been WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 have been developed with new capabilities developed with new capabilities Calculate the SHGC and UCalculate the SHGC and U--Factor of Factor of

Woven Shades, Woven Shades, Venetian Blinds, and Venetian Blinds, and Fritted GlassFritted Glass

Shading Systems Can Be LocatedShading Systems Can Be LocatedIndoorIndoorBetween GlazingBetween GlazingOutdoorOutdoor

Page 4: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Project ObjectivesProject Objectives

Perform and coordinate the data Perform and coordinate the data collection, research, and testing to collection, research, and testing to evaluate the new features within evaluate the new features within WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 WINDOW 6 and THERM 6

Page 5: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Project Tasks and DeliverablesProject Tasks and Deliverables

Task 1 Task 1 –– Literature Search Literature Search (3 Months)(3 Months)Compile and Evaluate Existing SHGC and UCompile and Evaluate Existing SHGC and U--Factor Test ResultsFactor Test ResultsDescribe Existing Methods of Calculating SHGC and UDescribe Existing Methods of Calculating SHGC and U--FactorsFactors

Task 2 Task 2 –– Perform Tests and Simulations Perform Tests and Simulations (7 Months)(7 Months)Identify and Procure Test SpecimensIdentify and Procure Test SpecimensPerform SHGC and UPerform SHGC and U--Factor TestsFactor TestsPerform SHGC and UPerform SHGC and U--Factor SimulationsFactor Simulations

Task 3 Task 3 –– Compare and Evaluate Results Compare and Evaluate Results (2 Months)(2 Months)Test and Simulation Results from Literature SearchTest and Simulation Results from Literature Search

All between glazing Venetian BlindsAll between glazing Venetian BlindsSHGC and USHGC and U--Factor Test ResultsFactor Test Results

Task 4 Task 4 –– Final Report & Papers Final Report & Papers (3 Months)(3 Months)

Page 6: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Task 2a OverviewTask 2a OverviewValidation TestingValidation Testing

26 SHGC Tests (2 U26 SHGC Tests (2 U--Factors Simulated)Factors Simulated)20 U20 U--Factor TestsFactor Tests

Test SpecimensTest Specimens6 Simple Glazing System Tests6 Simple Glazing System Tests

4 Reference Glazing4 Reference Glazing2 Fritted Glazing Samples (High & Low Density)2 Fritted Glazing Samples (High & Low Density)

7 Inside Shading System Tests7 Inside Shading System Tests3 Woven Blinds (Loose & Dense Weave)3 Woven Blinds (Loose & Dense Weave)2 Venetian Blinds (Open, 452 Venetian Blinds (Open, 45°°, Closed, High & Low , Closed, High & Low AbsorptanceAbsorptance))

10 Between10 Between--Glazing Shading System TestsGlazing Shading System Tests2 Woven Blinds2 Woven Blinds3 Venetian Blinds (Open, 453 Venetian Blinds (Open, 45°°, Closed, High & Low , Closed, High & Low AbsorptanceAbsorptance))1 Retracted (Venetian Blind)1 Retracted (Venetian Blind)

2 Outside Shading System Tests2 Outside Shading System Tests2 Sunscreen (Loose and Dense Weave, High & Low 2 Sunscreen (Loose and Dense Weave, High & Low AbsorptanceAbsorptance))

Page 7: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Task 2b OverviewTask 2b OverviewPerform SHGC TestsPerform SHGC Tests

NFRC 201 Laboratory (All NFRC 201 Laboratory (All Tests)Tests)

Architectural Testing, Architectural Testing, Inc. in Fresno, CA (ATI)Inc. in Fresno, CA (ATI)

PI Visit ATI during the PI Visit ATI during the week of October 6week of October 6--10, 10, 20082008All 26 SHGC Tests All 26 SHGC Tests CompletedCompleted

Page 8: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Task 2b OverviewTask 2b Overview (Continued)(Continued)

Perform UPerform U--Factor TestsFactor TestsNFRC 102 Laboratory (All NFRC 102 Laboratory (All Tests)Tests)

Architectural Testing, Architectural Testing, Inc. in Fresno, CA (ATI)Inc. in Fresno, CA (ATI)

UU--Factor Testing started Factor Testing started October 3, 2008October 3, 2008PI Visit ATI during the PI Visit ATI during the week of October 6week of October 6--10, 10, 20082008All 20 UAll 20 U--Factor Tests Factor Tests CompletedCompleted

Page 9: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Task 2c OverviewTask 2c OverviewPerform SHGC and UPerform SHGC and U--Factor SimulationsFactor Simulations

Carli, Inc. Has Generated Simulations Results:Carli, Inc. Has Generated Simulations Results:UU--Factor (NFRC 100)Factor (NFRC 100)SHGC (NFRC 200)SHGC (NFRC 200)

Two Environmental ConditionsTwo Environmental ConditionsActual Test Condition (SHGC & Us)Actual Test Condition (SHGC & Us)NFRC Standard Conditions (NFRC Standard Conditions (UstUst))

Three Simulation ModelsThree Simulation ModelsISO 15099ISO 15099University of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooLBNL Scalar 0.0 (Research Tool)LBNL Scalar 0.0 (Research Tool)LBNL Scalar 0.5 (Research Tool)LBNL Scalar 0.5 (Research Tool)LBNL Scalar 1.0 (Research Tool)LBNL Scalar 1.0 (Research Tool)

Page 10: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

RecommendationsRecommendations

Approve WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for:Approve WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for:SHGC OnlySHGC Only

Frit Glazing Frit Glazing Indoor Woven ShadeIndoor Woven ShadeIndoor Venetian BlindIndoor Venetian Blind

SHGC & USHGC & U--FactorFactorBetween Glass Venetian BlindBetween Glass Venetian BlindOutdoor Woven ShadeOutdoor Woven Shade

Page 11: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Criteria for RecommendationCriteria for Recommendation

UU--Factor (NFRC 100)Factor (NFRC 100)Within Within ±±0.03 if U0.03 if U--Factor is Factor is << 0.300.30Within 10% if UWithin 10% if U--Factor is > 0.30Factor is > 0.30

SHGC (PMTG)SHGC (PMTG)Within Within ±±0.06 if SHGC is 0.06 if SHGC is << 0.400.40Within 15% if SHGC is > 0.40Within 15% if SHGC is > 0.40

Criteria Values are Bold in the Following Tables

Values Outside Criteria are in Red Font (Part 2)

Page 12: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Comparison of SHGCComparison of SHGC Simple Glazing SystemsSimple Glazing Systems

NFRC 201 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Sgl

Clr

+ Metal Frame 0.72 0.680 -5.61% -0.040

Dbl Clr

+ Wood Frame 0.62 0.621 0.21% 0.001

Tpl

High α+ Wood Frame 0.41 0.467 13.79% 0.057

Dbl Low-E + Wood Frame 0.38 0.333 -12.36% -0.047

Minimum 0.38 0.335 -12.36% -0.047

Maximum 0.72 0.681 13.79% 0.057

Average 0.53 0.525 -0.99% -0.007

Standard Deviation 0.164 0.1567 11.11% 0.0477

Page 13: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Comparison of SHGCComparison of SHGC Simple Glazing SystemsSimple Glazing Systems

SHGC Test vs. Simulations ‐ Simple Glazing Systems (No Shades)

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

Sgl Clr + Metal Fram

e

Dbl Clr + Wood Frame

Dbl Low-E + Wood F

rame

SHGC NFRC 201 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 14: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Comparison of SHGCComparison of SHGC Simple Glazing SystemsSimple Glazing Systems

SHGC For Simple Glazing Systems

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

SHGC Test

SHGC Simkulation

 (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

SG04 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e

SG01 ‐ Metal  Sngl  Clr

SG02 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr

SG03 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr + High Abs  Indoor Glaz.

Page 15: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Comparison of UComparison of U--FactorFactor Simple Glazing SystemsSimple Glazing Systems

NFRC 102 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Sgl

Clr

+ Metal Frame 1.11 1.085 -2.38% -0.027

Dbl Clr

+ Wood Frame 0.43 0.451 5.23% 0.022

Tpl

High α+ Wood Frame 0.31 0.303 -2.46% -0.008

Dbl Low-E + Wood Frame 0.28 0.296 4.15% 0.012

Minimum 0.28 0.296 -2.46% -0.027

Maximum 1.11 1.085 5.23% 0.022

Average 0.53 0.534 1.13% 0.000

Standard Deviation 0.390 0.3745 4.13% 0.0216

Page 16: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Comparison of UComparison of U--FactorFactor Simple Glazing SystemsSimple Glazing Systems

Standardized Thermal Transmittance Test (Ust) vs. Simulations ‐ Simple Glazing Systems(No Shades)

0.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.3

Sgl Clr + Metal Fram

e

Dbl Clr + Wood Frame

Dbl Low-E + Wood F

rameStan

dardized

 The

rmal Transmittance 

(Ust), Btu/(hr*Ft

2 *F)

NFRC 102 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 17: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Comparison of UComparison of U--FactorFactor Simple Glazing SystemsSimple Glazing Systems

Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For Simple Glazing Systems

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40

Us (Actual) and Ust[CTS] (Standard) Test

U Simkulation

 (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

SG04 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐E

SG02 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr

SG03 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr + High Abs  Indoor Glaz.

SG01 ‐ Metal  Sngl  Clr

Page 18: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Frit Glazing SystemsFrit Glazing Systems

NFRC 201 ISO 15099Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Dbl Frit (High ρ) + Metal Frame 0.51 0.497 -2.55% -0.013

Dbl Frit (Low ρ) + Metal Frame 0.54 0.482 -10.74% -0.058

Minimum 0.51 0.482 -10.74% -0.058

Maximum 0.54 0.497 -2.55% -0.013

Average 0.53 0.490 -6.64% -0.036

Standard Deviation 0.021 0.0106 5.79% 0.0318

Page 19: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Frit Glazing SystemsFrit Glazing Systems

SHGC Test vs. Simulations ‐ Frit Glazing Systems (No Shades)

0.300.350.400.450.500.550.600.650.700.75

SHGC NFRC 201 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 20: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Frit Glazing SystemsFrit Glazing Systems

SHGC For Frits

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

SHGC Test

SHGC Simkulation (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

SG05 ‐ Metal  Dbl  Frit (V1086 @70%) + Clr

SG06 ‐ Metal  Dbl  Frit (V986 @30%) + Clr

Page 21: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Indoor Woven ShadesIndoor Woven Shades

NFRC 201 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Dbl Clr

+ High α

Screen 0.51 0.463 -9.19% -0.047

Dbl Low-E + Low α

Screen 0.24 0.246 2.32% 0.006

Sgl

Clr

+ High α

Screen 0.44 0.402 -8.55% -0.038

Minimum 0.24 0.246 -9.19% -0.047

Maximum 0.51 0.463 2.32% 0.006

Average 0.40 0.370 -5.14% -0.026

Standard Deviation 0.140 0.1123 6.47% 0.0280

Page 22: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Indoor Woven ShadesIndoor Woven Shades

SHGC Test vs. Simulations ‐ Indoor Woven Shades

0.200.250.300.350.400.450.500.550.600.65

SHGC NFRC 201 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 23: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Indoor Woven ShadesIndoor Woven Shades

SHGC For Inside Woven Shade

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

SHGC Test

SHGC Simkulation (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

IS02 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e + Low Abs  Loose Weave

IS03 ‐ Metal  Sngl  Clr + High Abs  Dense Weave

IS01 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr + High Abs  Dense Weave

Page 24: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Indoor Venetian BlindsIndoor Venetian Blinds

NFRC 201 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Dbl Low-E + Low α

Venetian (Closed) 0.18 0.120 -33.17% -0.060

Dbl Low-E + Low α

Venetian (45°) 0.27 0.211 -21.95% -0.059

Dbl Low-E + Low α

Venetian (Open) 0.37 0.320 -13.63% -0.050

Dbl Clr

+ High α

Venetian (Closed) 0.51 0.452 -11.47% -0.058

Minimum 0.18 0.120 -33.17% -0.060

Maximum 0.51 0.452 -11.47% -0.050

Average 0.33 0.276 -20.05% -0.057

Standard Deviation 0.142 0.1428 9.84% 0.0044

Page 25: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Indoor Venetian BlindsIndoor Venetian Blinds

SHGC Test vs. Simulations ‐ Indoor Venetian Blinds

0.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.450.500.55

SHGC NFRC 201 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 26: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Indoor Venetian BlindsIndoor Venetian Blinds

SHGC For Indoor Venetian Blinds

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

SHGC Test

SHGC Simkulation (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

IS04 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e Low Abs  Closed

IS05 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e Low Abs  45 Deg

IS06 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e Low Abs  Open

IS07 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr High Abs  Open

Page 27: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Between Glazing Venetian BlindsBetween Glazing Venetian Blinds

NFRC 201 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.Tpl

Low-E + Low α

Venetian (Closed) 0.14 0.115 -18.01% -0.025

Tpl

Low-E + Low α

Venetian (45°) 0.23 0.193 -16.03% -0.037

Tpl

Low-E + Low α

Venetian (Open) 0.28 0.284 1.25% 0.004

Tpl

Low-E + High α

Venetian (Closed) 0.26 0.206 -20.92% -0.054

Tpl

Low-E + High α

Venetian (45°) 0.25 0.232 -7.21% -0.018

Tpl

Low-E + High α

Venetian (Open) 0.31 0.270 -12.83% -0.040

Dbl Clr

+ Low α

Venetian (Open) 0.49 0.530 8.23% 0.040

Dbl Clr

+ High α

Venetian (Open) 0.52 0.530 1.86% 0.010

Dbl Clr

+ High α

Venetian (Retract) 0.57 0.540 -5.33% -0.030

Minimum 0.14 0.115 -20.92% -0.054

Maximum 0.57 0.540 8.23% 0.040

Average 0.34 0.322 -7.66% -0.017

Standard Deviation 0.150 0.1655 10.05% 0.0295

Page 28: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Between Glazing Venetian BlindsBetween Glazing Venetian Blinds

SHGC Test vs. Simulations ‐ Between Glass Venetian Blinds

0.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.450.500.550.60

SHGC

NFRC 201 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Waterloo Simulations

Page 29: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Between Glazing Venetian BlindsBetween Glazing Venetian Blinds

SHGC For Between Glazing Venetian Blinds

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

SHGC Test

SHGC Simkulation

 (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

BS03 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) Low Abs  Closed

BS04 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) Low Abs  45 deg

BS05 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) Low Abs  Open

BS06 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) High Abs  Closed

BS07 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) High Abs  45 deg

BS08 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) High Abs  Open

BS09 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) Low Abs  Open

BS10 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) High Abs  Open

BS11 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) High Abs  Retracted

Page 30: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: URecommendation: U--FactorFactor Between Glazing Venetian BlindsBetween Glazing Venetian Blinds

NFRC 102 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.Tpl

Low-E + Low α

Venetian (Closed) 0.25 0.256 1.04% 0.003Tpl

Low-E + Low α

Venetian (45°) 0.26 0.270 3.85% 0.010Tpl

Low-E + Low α

Venetian (Open) 0.27 0.274 1.50% 0.004Dbl Clr

+ High α

Venetian (Open) 0.42 0.439 5.11% 0.021Dbl Clr

+ High α

Venetian (Retract) 0.46 0.479 4.08% 0.019Minimum 0.25 0.256 1.04% 0.003Maximum 0.46 0.479 5.11% 0.021Average 0.33 0.344 3.12% 0.011Standard Deviation 0.099 0.1063 1.76% 0.0084

Page 31: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: URecommendation: U--FactorFactor Between Glazing Venetian BlindsBetween Glazing Venetian Blinds

Standardized Thermal Transmittance Test (Ust) vs. SimulationsBetween Glass Venetian Blinds

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Stan

dardized

 The

rmal Trans

mitt

ance

 (U

st), Btu/(hr*F

t2*F

)

NFRC 102 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Waterloo Simulations

Page 32: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: URecommendation: U--FactorFactor Between Glazing Venetian BlindsBetween Glazing Venetian Blinds

Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For Between Glazing Venetian Blinds

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

Us (Actual) and Ust[CTS] (Standard) Test

U Simkulation

 (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

BS03 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) Low Abs  Closed

BS04 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) Low Abs  45 deg

BS05 ‐ Wood Tpl  Low‐e (Dbl+P) Low Abs  Open

BS06 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) High Abs  Open

BS07 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) High Abs  Retracted

Page 33: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven Shades

NFRC 201 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Dbl Clr

+ Low α

Screen 0.27 0.319 18.06% 0.049

Dbl Low-E + High α

Screen 0.07 0.029 -59.10% -0.041

Minimum 0.07 0.029 -59.10% -0.041

Maximum 0.27 0.319 18.06% 0.049

Average 0.17 0.174 -20.52% 0.004

Standard Deviation 0.141 0.2051 54.56% 0.0637

Page 34: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven Shades

SHGC Test vs. Simulations ‐ Outdoor Woven Shades

0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.45

SHGC NFRC 201 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 35: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: SHGCRecommendation: SHGC Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven Shades

SHGC For Outdoor Woven Shades

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

SHGC Test

SHGC Simkulation (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

OS02 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e  High Abs  Dense Weave 

OS01 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) Low Abs  Loose Weave

Page 36: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: URecommendation: U--FactorFactor Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven Shades

NFRC 102 ISO 15099

Test Specimen Test Simulation % Diff. Diff.

Dbl Clr

+ Low α

Screen 0.38 0.380 -0.82% -0.003

Dbl Low-E + High α

Screen 0.26 0.242 -6.08% -0.016

Minimum 0.26 0.242 -6.08% -0.016

Maximum 0.38 0.380 -0.82% -0.003

Average 0.32 0.311 -3.45% -0.009

Standard Deviation 0.089 0.0982 3.72% 0.0088

Page 37: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: URecommendation: U--FactorFactor Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven Shades

Standardized Thermal Transmittance Test (Ust) vs. Simulations ‐ Outdoor Woven Shades

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Stan

dardized

 The

rmal Trans

mitt

ance

 (Ust), 

Btu/

(hr*Ft

2 *F) NFRC 102 Test Results

ISO 15099 Simulations

Page 38: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Recommendation: URecommendation: U--FactorFactor Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven Shades

Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For Outside Woven Shade

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

Us (Actual) and Ust[CTS] (Standard) Test

U Simkulation

 (ISO

 15099)

Standard Conditions

Actual  Test Conditions

OS02 ‐ Wood Dbl  Low‐e  High Abs  Dense Weave 

OS01 ‐ Wood Dbl  Clr (Sngl+P) Low Abs  Loose Weave

Page 39: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

RecommendationsRecommendations

Approve WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for:Approve WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for:SHGC OnlySHGC Only

Frit GlazingFrit GlazingAgree with SHGC Test within 0.06 (10.7%) Agree with SHGC Test within 0.06 (10.7%)

Indoor ScreenIndoor ScreenAgree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (9.2%)Agree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (9.2%)

Indoor Venetian BlindIndoor Venetian BlindAgree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (9.2%)Agree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (9.2%)

Page 40: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

RecommendationsRecommendations

Approve WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for:Approve WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for:SHGC & USHGC & U--FactorFactor

Venetian Blinds Between GlassVenetian Blinds Between GlassAgree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (20.9%)Agree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (20.9%)Agree with UAgree with U--Factor Test within 0.02 (5.1%)Factor Test within 0.02 (5.1%)

Outdoor Woven ShadesOutdoor Woven ShadesAgree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (59.1%)Agree with SHGC Test within 0.05 (59.1%)Agree with UAgree with U--Factor Test within 0.02 (6.1%)Factor Test within 0.02 (6.1%)

Page 41: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

Questions or Comments?Questions or Comments?

Page 42: Validation of WINDOW 6 and THERM 6 for Use in … · NFRC 102 Test Results ISO 15099 Simulations. Comparison of U-Factor Simple Glazing Systems. Us vs. Actual & Ust vs. Standard For

IntermissionIntermission (5 Minutes)(5 Minutes)