Top Banner
Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague swarms in West Bohemia inferred from observations of non-doble-couple components in seismic moment tensors
20

Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

emmy

Origin of earthquake swarms in West Bohemia inferred from observations of non- doble -couple components in seismic moment tensors. Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague. West-Bohemia n earthquake swarm in 2008. Springs of mineral water and emanations of CO2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Václav VavryčukInstitute of Geophysics, Prague

Origin of earthquake swarms in West Bohemia

inferred from observations of non-doble-couple components

in seismic moment tensors

Origin of earthquake swarms in West Bohemia

inferred from observations of non-doble-couple components

in seismic moment tensors

Page 2: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

West-Bohemian earthquake swarm

in 2008

West-Bohemian earthquake swarm

in 2008

Page 3: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Springs of mineral water and emanations of CO2

Page 4: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Seismicity in West Bohemia, Czech republic

Page 5: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Data and methods

Data• 249 selected micro-earthquakes from the 2008 swarm • Magnitudes between 0.5 – 3.7, depth between 7 and 11 km• 18-22 local short-period seismic stations • Sampling rate 250 Hz

Method• Double-difference location method

– P and S wave arrivals obtained using cross-correlation• Frequency-domain waveform inversion for moment tensors

– P waves, 1-D smooth model, ray-theoretical Green’s functions

Page 6: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Double-difference locations: map view

main active fault

2 km

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2main active fault

4 km

Bouchaala, Vavryčuk, Fischer, J. Seismology, 2013

Vavryčuk Bouchaala, Fischer, Tectonophysics, 2013

Page 7: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Examples of focal mechanisms

Waveform inversion of P waves

good focal sphere coverage, slightly non-DC mechanisms

Page 8: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Variety of focal mechanisms

249 most accurate focal mechanisms

three basic types of focal mechanisms

Nodal lines P/T axes

o P axis, + T axis

Page 9: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Locations & focal mechanisms: map view

main active fault

2 km

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2main active fault

4 km

most frequent focal mechanism

Page 10: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Mohr’s diagramfirst

principalfault

secondprincipal

fault

.

.P

T

PT

20 km

EGR

MLF

Tectonic sketch and principal faults

maximum compression coincides with that for western and central Europe

Page 11: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Focal mechanisms and non-DC components

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15CLVD-ISO: all events

CLVD [%]

ISO

[%]

Nodal linesNon-DC components

Page 12: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

ISO

[%

]

CLVD [%]

Focal mechanisms and non-DC components

Page 13: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Shear-tensile source model

Positive ISO and CLVD : positive slope angle, fault is openingNegative ISO and CLVD: negative slope angle, fault is closing

][u

Moment tensors

2.0 1.7

1.5

fault is opening

Moment tensors components: ISO – isotropic component

CLVD – compensated linear vector dipoleDecomposition into ISO, DC and CLVD is after Vavryčuk (2001)

Page 14: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Diamond source-type plot

ISO

CLVD

Diamond plot

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

ISO3

23

1.51.4

1.31.2

CLVD

Diamond plot

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DC

Diamond plot

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Moment tensors Source tensors

Page 15: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

opening of a fault

Non-DC components

Non-DC components and shear-tensile faulting: 1997

Slip deviation from the fault

crackclosing crack opening

Slope angle [ º ]CLVD [% ]

Page 16: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15CLVD-ISO: all events

CLVD [%]

ISO

[%]

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 60

10

20

30

40

50

60All mechanisms

slope angleN

eve

nts

Slope angle [ � ]

N e

ven

ts

closing of a fault, rock compaction

Non-DC components Slip deviation from the fault

crack closing crack opening

Non-DC components and shear-tensile faulting: 2008

Page 17: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Origins of rock compaction: fluid-rock interaction

• Permanent fluid flow in the Earth’s crust

• Hydrothermal alteration of rocks

• Dissolution of minerals

• Transport of dissolved material to the surface

• Fault erosion by fluids

Borehole picture of open fluid-filled fracture at depth of 111 mThe fracture width is 1-2 cmAfter Heinicke et al. (2009)

Page 18: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Seismic cycles: alternative scenarios

Stress accumulation

Fault weakening

stre

ss

time

fault strength

stress

time

faul

tstr

engt

h

(seismicity at margins of continental plates)

(intraplate seismicity)

Page 19: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

• intraplate seismicity in a geothermal area with numerous springs • repeated occurrence of earthquake swarms at the same focal zone (1985/86, 1997, 1997, 2000, 2008, 20011)

• prevailing focal mechanisms are slightly compressive (negative ISO and CLVD)

• swarms are triggered by fault weakening rather than by stress accumulation

Swarm triggering

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

main active fault

4 km

left-lateral

right-lateral

σ1

Swarm 2008

Page 20: Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague

Thank you for your attention

Karlovy Vary spa