UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitive construction in Russian Fortuin, E.L.J. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Fortuin, E. L. J. (2001). Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitive construction in Russian Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. Download date: 14 May 2018
12
Embed
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Polysemy or ... · PDF fileinin het moderne Russisch. Doctoral dissertation: University of Amsterdam. ... Russische historische Grammatik. Heidelberg:
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitiveconstruction in RussianFortuin, E.L.J.
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):Fortuin, E. L. J. (2001). Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitiveconstruction in Russian Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation
General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
ANSANS (Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst), 1984. Geerts, G. et al. (eds). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff. .
Apresjan,, Ju.D. 1992. Leksikograficheslde portrety (na primere glagola byt). In: Inform. processyprocessy i sistemy 3,20-33.
Apresjan,, Ju. D. & Iomdin, L.L. 1989. Konstrukcija tipa negde spat': Sintaksis, semantika, leksikografija.. In: Nesterov, P.V. (ed) Semiotika i informatika 29, 34—92. Moskva: Viniti .
Archangeli,, D. & Langendoen, D.T. 1997. Optimality Theory: An overview. Malden, MA: BlackwelL L
Armstrong,, S.L., Gleitman, L. & Gleitman, H. 1983. What some concepts might not be. In:: Cognition 13,263-308.
Baranov,, A.N. & Kobozeva, I.M. 1983. Semantika obshchix voprosov v russkom jazyke (kategorijaa ustanovki). In: I^yestijaAN SSSK, Serija Literatury ija^yka 42(3), 263-274.
Barbiers,, S. 1995. The syntax of interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, HIL , Leiden University. Thee Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Barentsen,, A. 1985. Tijd\ 'aspect' en de conjunctie poka: Over betekenis en gebruik van enkele vormen inin het moderne Russisch. Doctoral dissertation: University of Amsterdam.
Barentsen,, A. forthcoming. In: Houtzagers, P. (ed.) Handboek Russische grammatica. Bussum: Coutinho. .
Bartsch,, R. 1984. The structure of word-meaning. Polysemy, metaphor, metonymy. In: Landman, F. && Veltman, F. (eds) Varieties of formal semantics, 24—55. Dordrecht Foris.
Bartsch,, R. 1996. The myth of literal meaning. In: Weigand, E. & Hundsnurscher, F. (eds) LexicalLexical structures and language use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Lexicology and LexicalLexical Semantics. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.
505 5
References References
Bartsch,, R. 1998. Dynamic conceptual semantics: A logico-philosophical investigation into concept formationformation and understanding. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Belevitskaya-Khalizeva,, V.S. 1965. Exercises in Russian syntax: Compound and complex sentences, Moscow:: Progress.
Birjulin ,, L.A. 1993. Sintakticheskoe predstavlenie russkogo impersonala (tipa svetaet): K istoriii i teorii voprosa. In: Russian Linguistics 17,181—203.
Birjulin ,, L. 1994. Semantika i pragmatika russkogo imperativa. Helsinki: Department of Slavonicc languages, University of Helsinki.
Bondarko,, A.V. 1991. Functional grammar, si field approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. .
Bondarko,, A.V. & Bulanin, L. 1967. Russkij glagol. Leningrad: Prosveshchenie. Bonnot,, C.I. & Fougeron, I. 1982. L'accent de phrase initial en russe est-il toujours un
signee d'expressivité ou de familiarité? In: Bulletin de la Sociétê de Unguistique de Paris 87(1),, 309-330.
Bybee,, J. & Fleischman, S. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Johnn Benjamins.
Bybee,, J. & Pagliuca, W. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammaticall meaning. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) Historical semantics: Historical word-formation, 59— 83.. Berlin, etc.: Mouton.
Chagisheva,, V.I. 1971. Istorija vtorogo datel'nogo sushchestvitel'nogo v russkom jazyke (XI-XV II w ). In: Bogorodskij, B.L. et al. (eds) Grammatika i leksika russkogo jaqyka, 210-232.. Leningrad: Pedagogicheskij Institut Gercena.
506 6
References References
Chvany,, V.C. 1975. On the syntax ofBE-sentences in Russian. Cambridge, MA: Slavica. Comrie,, B. 1974. The second dative: A transformational approach. In: Brecht, R. &
Chvany,, C. (eds) Slavic transformational syntax, 123-150. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan. .
Coseriu,, E. 1966. Tomo y me vof: Ein Problem vergleichender europaischer Syntax. In: VoxVox Romanica 25,13—55.
Damerow,, P. 1996. Abstraction and representation: Essays on the cultural evolution of thinking. Dordrecht,, etc.: Kluwer.
Dancygier,, B. & Sweetser, E. 1996. Conditionals, distancing, and alternative spaces. In: Goldberg,, A. (ed.) Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 83-98. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. .
Dik,, S.C. 1989. The theory of junctional grammar, part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht Foris. .
Dippong,, H. 1995. Zum Subjekt von Imperativsatzen. In: Dippong, H. (ed) Unguistische BeitrdgeBeitrdge %ur Slavistik aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schwei ̂ 47-61. München: Otto Sagner. .
Donhauser,, K. 1986. Derlmperativ im Deutschen. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. Ebeling,, C.L. 1956. On the verbal predicate in Russian. In: Halle, M. (ed) For Roman
Jakobson:Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 86—88. The Hague: Mouton & Co. Ebeling,, C.L. 1978. Syntax and semantics: A taxonomie approach. Leiden: Brill . Ebeling,, C.L. 1984. On the meaning of the Russian infinitive. In: Van Baak, J.J. (ed) Signs
ofof friendship, 97-130. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Ekberg,, L. 1993. The cognitive basis of the meaning and function of cross-linguistic take
andand V. In: Belgian Journal of Linguistics 8 ,23- 42. Fauconnier,, G. & Sweetser, E. 1996. Spaces worlds and grammar. Chicago/London: The Uni-
versityy of Chicago Press. Fillmore,, C. 1968. Hie case for case. In: Bach, E. and Harms, R.T. (eds) Universals in
linguisticlinguistic theory, 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Fodor,, J. 1976. The language of thought. Hassocks: The Harvester Press. Fooien,, A. 1993. De betekenis van partikels. Doctoral disseration, University of Nijmegen. Formanovskaja,, N.I. 1989. Slo^hnoepredloyhenie. Moskva: Russkij Jazyk. Forsyth,, J. 1970. A grammar of aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Franks,, S. 1990. Case, configuration, and argumenthood Reflections on the second
dative.. In: Russian Linguistics 14,231-254. Garda,, E. 1975. The role of theory in linguistic analysis: The Spanish pronoun system. Amsterdam/-
Oxfordd North-Holland
507 7
References References
Garde,, P. 1963. L'emploi du conditionalet de laparticuk by en russe. Aix-en-Provence: Editions Ophrys. .
Giannakidou,, A. 1997. The landscape of polarity items. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 18.. Groningen: Grodil.
Ginsburg,, H.P. &c Opper, S. 1988. Piaget's theory of intellectual development. Third edition. Englewoodd Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Givón,, T. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press. Givón,, T. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:
Johnn Benjamins. Givón,, T. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Goddard,, C. 1998. Bad arguments against semantic primitives. In: Theoretical Linguistics
24(2/3),, 129-156. Goldberg,, A.E. 1995. Constructions. A construction approach to argument structure. Chicago/-
London:: The University of Chicago Press. Haiman,, J. 1985. Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. . Hansen,, B. 1998. Modalauxiliare in den slavischen Sprachen. In: Zeitschriftfur Slawistik 43,
3,, 249-374. Haverkate,, W.H. 1979. Impositive sentences in Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Hinrkhs,, U. 1983. Die sogenannten 'Vvodnye Slova' (Schalwörter/Modalwörter) im Russischen.
Wiesbaden:: Otto Harrassowitz. Isachenko,, A.V. 1957. K voprosu ob imperative v russkom jazyke. In: Russkij ]a%yk v
ShkoleShkole 6,7-11. Isachenko,, A.V. 1960. Grammaticheskij stro/ russkogo ja%yka v sopostavlenii s slovackim:
Morfohgtja,Morfohgtja, chast' vtoraja. Bratislava: Slovackoj Akademii Nauk. Isachenko,, A.V. 1982. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart: Formenlehre. Fourth edition.
München:: s.n. Issatchenko,, A.V. 1983. Geschichte der russischen Sprache, Vol. 2. Birnbaum, H. et al
(eds).. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag. Jakobson,, R. 1960. Der Doppelcharakter der Sprache: Die Polaritat zwischen Metaphorik
undd Metonymik. In: Ihwe, J. (ed) Literaturwissenschaft und Unguistik, Vol. 1: Grundkgen undund Vorausset^ungen, 323-333. Frankfurt: Athenaum.
Jakobson,, R. 1971. Morfologocheskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem (sostav russkixx padezhnyx form). In: Selected writings, Vol. 2, Word and language, 154-183. Moscow,, etc.: Mouton.
Jakobson,, R. 1995 [1936]. Contribution to the general theory of case. In: Waugh, L.R. and
508 8
References References
Monville-Burston,, M. (eds), On language, 332-385. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard Universityy Press.
Jarceva,, V.N.1990. LinguisticheskijèncekJopedicheskijsJovar'. Moskva: Sovetskaja Endklopedija. Jurovskij,, V. 1996. Bessqju^nye slo^hnyepredlo^henifa v direktivnyx rechevyx aktax. Bern: Lang. Junghanns,, U. 1994. Syntaktische und semantische Eigenschaften Russischer finaler Infinitiveinbet-
tungen.tungen. Slavistische Beitrage 315. München: Otto Sagner. Karcevski,, S. 1927. Système du verbe Russe. Prague: Legiografie. Keenan,, EX. 1976. Towards a universal definition of 'subject5. In: Li , C. (ed.) Subject and
topictopictt 305-333. New York: Academic Press. Keijsper,, C.E. 1985. Information structure. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Keijsper,, C.E. 1994. From accent to transitivity. In: Dutch contributions to the Eleventh
InternationalInternational Congress ofSlavists, Bratislava (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 22), 193-329.. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kiparsky,, V. 1963. Russische historische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter. Kogtaj,, I. 1968. K voprosu ob invariantnom qtachenii form russkogo imperativa. In: Ruzhichka, J.
(ed.)) Recueil linguistique de Bratislava, 159-167. Bratislava: Vydavatel'stvo Slovenskej Akadémiee Vied.
Komar,, E.S. 1999. Dative subject in Russian revisited: Are all datives created equal? In: Dziwirek,, K. et al (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The SeattleSeattle Meeting 1998,245-264. Ann Arbor, MI : Michigan Slavic Publications.
Kompeer,, K. 1992. A note on word order and its meaning: SPIT BABUSHKA versus BABUSHKAA SPIT. In: Studies in Russian Linguistics, 215-225.
Kondrashova,, N. 1994. Agreement and dative subjects in Russian. In: Avrutin, S. et al (eds)) Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The MIT'Meeting 1993, 255-285.. Ann Arbor, MI : Michigan Slavic Publications.
Langacker,, R.W. 1991b. Concept, image, and symbol' The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin/New
509 9
References References
York:: Mouton de Gruyter. Langacker,, R.W. 1999. Indeterminacy in semantics and grammar. In: Cifuentes Honrubia,
J.L.. (ed.) Estudios de linguistica cognitiva, Vol. 2, 649-672. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante. .
Leech,, G. 1989. The principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman. Levinson,, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press. Levontina,, LB. Slovar'nye stat'i chasticy -KA i sushchestvitel'nogo mesjac. In: Semiotika i
informatikainformatika 32,136-140. Lubensky,, S. 1995. Russian-English dictionary of idioms. New York: Random House. Matsumoto,, Y. 1996. Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and
linguisticc bases. In: Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds) Spaces, worlds and grammar, 124—156.. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Maurice,, F. 1995. Zur Verteilung von Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit im russischen modalenn Infinitiv . In: Dippong, H. (ed.) Unguistische Beitrdge yur Slavistik, 147-158. München:: Otto Sagner.
Maurice,, F. 1996. Der modale Infinitiv in der modernen russischen Standardsprache. München: Otto Sagner. .
Mazon,, A. 1914. Emplois des aspects du verbe russe. Doctoral dissertation, Faculté des lettres, Universityy of Paris.
%a%a Rube^hom 1, 66-71. Neidle,, C. 1982. Case agreement in Russian. In: Bresnan, J. (ed.) The mental representation of
grammaticalgrammatical relations, 391^26, Cambridge, MA: MI T Press. Neidle,, C. 1988. The role of case in Russian syntax. Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer. Nikiforov,, S.D. 1952. Glagol— ego kategorii i formy v russkom pis'mennosti vtorojpoloviny XVI
veka.veka. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR Osipova,, L.E. 1992. Otnositel'nye konstrukcii s chasticej ni v sovremennom russkom ja^yke. Tver':
Tverskijj Gosudarstvennyj Universitet Paducheva,, E.V. 1996. Semanticheskoe isskdovanija: Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom ja^yke;
semantikasemantika narrativa. Moskva: Shkola ^Jazyki russkoj kul'tury'. Palmer,, F.R. 1981. Semantics. Cambridge: University Press. Palva,, H. 1977. The descriptive imperative of narrative style in Spoken Arabic. In: Folia
510 0
References References
OrientaüaOrientaüa 18, 5-26. Pahra,, H. 1984. Further notes on the descriptive imperative of narrative style in Spoken
Arabic.. In: Studia Orientaüa edited by the Finnish Oriental Society 55, 379-391. Percov,, N.V. 1998. K probleme invarianta grammaticheskogo znachenija II : Imperativ v
russkomm jazyke. In: Voprosy Ja%yho%nanija 2, 88—101. Peshkovskij,, A.M. 1956. Russkijsintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii. Moskva: Uchpedgiz. Proeme,, H. 1991. Over de Nederlandse imperativus. In: Studies over het Poolse, Nederlandse en
Proeme,, H. forthcoming. In: Houtzagers, P. (ed.) Handboek Russische grammatica. Bussum: Coutinho. .
Prokopovich,, E.N. 1969. Stilistika chaste/ rechi. Moskva: Prosveshchenie. Rappaport,, G.C. 1985. Aspect and modality in the context of negation. In: Flier S. &
Timberlake,, A. (eds) The scope of 'Slavic aspect, 194—223. Columbus, OH: Slavica. Rosch,, E. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In:
Moore,, T. (ed.) Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 111—144. New York Academicc Press.
Rosch,, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (eds) Cognition and categorization,categorization, 27-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rubinstein,, G. 1986. Subjective dative in Russian infinitival clauses of purpose. In: Slavic andand East European Journal 30(3), 367-379.
RusskajaRusskaja Grammatika, 1980. Shvedova, N.Ju. (ed.), Vols 1-2. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka. Rüzichka,, R. 1994. Asymmetry and parallelism between affirmative and negative (ne) (est)
gdegde spat'. In: Russian Linguistics 18(1), 53-72. Sanders,, J. & Redeker, G. 1996. Perspective and the representation of speech and thought
inn narrative discourse. In: Fauconnier, G. & Sweetser, E. (eds) Spaces, worlds and grammar,grammar, 290-317. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Sandra,, D. & Rice, S. 1995. Network analyses of prepositional meanings: Mirroring whose mindd — the linguist's or the language user's? In: Cognitive Linguistics 6(1), 89—130.
Scholz,, F. 1973. Russian impersonal expressions used with reference to a person. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. .
Schoorlemmer,, M. 1994. Dative subjects in Russian. In: J. Toman (ed.) Annual Workshop onon Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Ann Arbor Meeting: Functional categories in SlavicSlavic syntax, 400-422. Ann Arbor, MI : Michigan Slavic Publications.
Schoorlemmer,, M 1995. Participial passive and aspect in Russian. Utrecht OTS. Searle,, J. 1975. A classification of Elocutionary Acts. In: Language and Society 5,1—23.
511 1
References References
Searle,J.. 1991 [1983]. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle,, J. 1979. Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and thought, 92-123. Cambridge:
Cambridgee University Press. Shatunovskij,, LB. 1996. Semantika predlozhenija i nereferentnye slova. Moskva: Shkola ^azyki
russkojj kul'tury'. Sheljakin,, M.A. 1986. Russkije mestoimenija. Tartu: Tartuskij Gosudarstvennyj Universitet. Shmelëv,, D.N. 1961. Vneimperativnoe upotreblenie formy povelitel'nogo naklonenija v
sovremennomm russkom ja2yke. In: RusskijJa^yk v Shkole 5, 50-55. Shvedova,, N. Ju. 1955. Nekotorye vidy znachenij skazuemogo v sovremennom russkom
jazyke.. In: Pospelov, N.S. & Svedova, N.Ju. (eds) Issledovanija po grammatike ruskogo literaturnogoja%yka,literaturnogoja%yka, l^l—'bAX. Moskva: IzdateFstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.
Shvedova,, N.Ju. 1974. O dolzhenstvovatel'nom naklonenii. In: Zolotova, G.A. (ed.) SintaksisSintaksis i norma, 107—121. Moskva: IzdateFstvo Nauka.
Siewierska,, A. 1988. Word order rules. New York: Croom Helm. Signorini,, S. 1993. Infinitivnye predlozhenija v russkom jazyke Rossii pervoj poloviny
XVI II veka. In: Fid Giusti, F. & Signorini, S. (eds) Kategorija skazuemogo v slavjanskix ja^ykax:ja^ykax: Modal'nost'i aktuaü\acija, 195-207. München: Otto Sagner.
Sirotinina,, O.V. 1965. Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke. Saratov: Izdatel'stvo Saratovskogo Universiteta. .
Smith,, M.B. 1994. Agreement and iconicity in Russian impersonal constructions. In: CognitiveCognitive Linguistics 5, 5—56.
Sobolevskij,, A.I. 1962 [1907]. Lekciipo istorii russkagojaqyka. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co. Steedman,, J.M. 1977. Verb, time and modality. In: Cognitive Science 1, 216-234. Stender-Peterson,, A. 1930. O perv%hitochnyx sledax aorista v slavjanskix ja%ykax,
preimuchestvennopreimuchestvenno v russkom. Acta Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis, Humaniora 18. .
Sweetser,, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sweetser,, E. 1996. Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In:
Fauconnier,, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds) Spaces, world and grammmar, 318—333. Chicago/London:: The University of Chicago Press.
Talmy,, L. 1985. Force dynamics in language and thought In: Papen from the Parasession on
512 2
References References
CausativesCausatives andAgentivity, 293-337. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Tarlanov,, Z.K. 1982. Ocherkipo sintaksisu russkixposlovic. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningrad-
skogoo Universiteta. Timofeev,, FLA.. 1950. Ob osnovnyx tipax infinitivnyx predlozhenij v sovremennom
Izdatel'stvoo Leningradskogo Universiteta. Velichko,, A.V. 1996. Sintakticheskajajra^eologija. Moskva: Filologicheskij Fakul'tet MGU. Verhagen,, A. 1986. Linguistic theory and the Junction of word order in Dutch. Doctoral
dissertation,, Vrij e Universiteit Amsterdam. Veyrenc,, J. 1979. Lis propositions infinitives en russe. Paris: Bibliothèque Russe. Veyrenc,, J. 1980. Études sur le verb russe. Paris: Institut d' Etudes Slaves. Veyrenc,, J. 1983. Le verbe 'être' en russe moderne. In: Ille Colloque de Linguistique Russe,
Vinogradov,, V.V. & Shvedova, IJu. 1964c. Ocherkipo istoricheskoj grummatike Russkojp liter-aturnogpjaqykaaturnogpjaqyka XIX veka: Iqnenenija v sisteme slovosochetany. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
Vygotsky,, L. 1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MI T Press. Wade,, T. 1992. A comprehensive Russian grammar. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: BlackwelL Wetzer,, H. 1995. Nouniness and verbiness. Doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen University.
513 3
References References
Wierzbicka,, A. 1966. Slavjanskij dativus cum infinitivus. In: International Journal of Slavic LinguisticsLinguistics and Poetics 10, 82-102.
Wierzbicka,, A. 1978. Syntax vs. semantics. In: Theoretical Linguistics 5,115-133. Wierzbicka,, A. 1986. The meaning of a case: A study of the Polish dative. In: Brecht, R.D.
&& Levine, J.S. (eds) Case in Slavic, 386-426. Columbus, OH: Slavica. Wierzbicka,, A. 1987. The semantics of modality. In: Folia Linguistica 21(1), 25-43. Wierzbicka,, A. 1996. Semantics. Primes and universal. Oxford/New York: Oxford University
Press. . Wittgenstein,, L. 1984. Traktatus logico-philosophicus. Werkausgabe Band 1. Tagebiicher 1914—
Izdatel'stvoo Nauka. Yokoyama,, O.T. 1986. Discourse and word order. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Zaefferer,, D. 1991. Semantic universals and universal semantics. Berlin/New York: Foris. Zaichkova,, I. 1972. Datel'njf bespredlo%hnyj v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jasyke. Praha:
Universitaa Karlova. Zaitseva,, V. 1990. Conditions for the presence of the dative NP in Russian impersonal
constructions.. In: Harvard Studies of Linguistics 1, 215—229. Zolotova,, G.A. 1982. Kommunikativnye aspekty russkogo sintaksisa. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo
Nauka. .
514 4
References References
Textt sources
Thee Russian examples (extracts) in this dissertation are from (i) the corpus of A. Barentsen,, Department of Slavic linguistics, University of Amsterdam, (ii) Internet, (iii ) nativee speakers of Russian, and (iv) the following literary texts:
Amal'rik,, A. 1970 P'esy. Amsterdam: Fond imeni Gercena. Babel',, I. 1989. Kxtnarmija. Murmansk: Murmanskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel'stvo. Chexov,, A.P. 1988. Sredi mityx moskvichej. Moskva: Pravda. Erofeev,, V. 1993. l^brannye rasskavy, povesti. Mosvka, etc.: Tret'ja Volna. Gogol',, N.V. 1976. Sobranie sochinenij. Moskva: Xudozhestvennaja Literatura. Leskov,, N.S. 1979. I^brannyc sochinenija. Moskva: Xudozhestvennaja Literatura. Majakovskij,, V.V. 1987. Sochinenija v dvux tomax. Vol. 1. Moskva: Pravda. Paustovskij,, K. 1985. Nachaio neveaomogo veka. Vremja boVshix oi^hiaanij. Kiev: Izdatel'stvo
Xudozhestvennojj Literatury Dnipro. Pil'njak,, B. 1990. Chelovecheskij veter. veter. Romany. Povesti. Rasska^y. Chubinashvili: Ganadeba. TheThe Penguin book of Russian verse. 1962. Obolensky, D. (ed.). Middlesex: Penguin Books. Xarms,, D. 1991. Polet v nebesa. Leningrad: Sovetskij Pisatel'. Zoshchenko,, M. 1935 Is^bmnnye rasskaqy. Leningrad: Xudozhestvennaja Literatura.