Uttar Pradesh Pro-Poor Tourism Development Project

Supplemental Letter

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

OFFICIALDecember 28, 2017

International Bank for Reconstructionianqevelopmen1818 H Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20433United States of America

INDIA: Loan No. 8811-IN(Uttar Pradesh Pro-Poor Tourism Development Project)Performance Monitoring Indicators

Dear Sirs and Mesdames:

We refer to Section II of the Schedule to the Project Agreement between the InternationalBank for Reconstruction and Development ("Bank") and the State of Uttar Pradesh.

Unless otherwise agreed with the Bank, we shall monitor and evaluate the

implementation of the Project in accordance with the Performance Monitoring Indicators attached

to this letter.

Very truly yours,

UTTAR PRADESH

ByAuthorized Representative

Attachment - Performance Monitoring Indicators

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Results FrameworkIndia

Uttar Pradesh Pro-Poor Tourism Development Project

Project Development Objectives

The Project Development Objective is to increase tourism-related benefits for local communities in targeted destinations

Project Development Objective Indicators

Unit of Responsibility forIndicator Name Core Baseline End Target Frequency Data Source/Methodology Daapolto

Measure Data Collection

Name: Increase in average Amount(US 6.80 10.20 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCU

daily tourist expenditure in D)project destinations (daytourist)

Increase in average daily Amount(US 13.80 20.70 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCU

tourist expenditure in D)project destinations(overnight tourists)

Description: Tourist expenditure include accommodation, ticket costs, local transportation, food and beverages, souvenirs and local shopping, etc

Name: Increase in average Days 0.25 0.50 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCU

duration of stay of tourists inproject areas

Description: The average stay of tourists / pilgrims in the project destinations, disaggregated by day visitors and overnight visitors and domestic and international visitors

Name: Number of Number 0.00 500.00 Annual Project MIS, DoT SPCU

households in subproject

Indicator Name Core Unit of Baseline End Target Frequency Data Source/Methodology Responsibility forMeasure Data Collection

areas with improvedconditions (e.g., access tobasic services), disaggregatedby gender

Description: Access to basic services includes, but is not included to, to households with improved access to toilets, street lighting, solid waste collection, drainage,sewerage, roads and walkways, etc.

Name: Number of Number 0.00 300.00 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCUentrepreneurs in projectdestinations with increasedincome, disaggregated bygender

Description: Number of self employed individuals, professionals and small businesses in the project destinations, with increased annual income, who have been providedsupport for business development, better product offerings, improved linkages with the tourism value chain, etc.

Intermediate Results Indicators

.Unit of Responsibility forIndicator Name Core Baseline End Target Frequency Data Source/Methodology DaapoltoMeasure Data Collection

Name: Increase in numbers Number 43600000. 47300000. Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCUof visitors in project 00 00destinations (domestic)

Increase in numbers of Number 1400000.0 1500000.0visitors in project 0 0destinations (international)

Unit of Responsibility forIndicator Name Core Baseline End Target Frequency Data Source/Methodology Daapollecto

Measure Data Collection

Description: Disaggregated data for increase in domestic and international visitors in project destinations, includiing source markets

Name: State tourism Yes/No N Y Bi-annual Project MIS, DoT SPCUinformation and visitormanagement system re-designed and providingdisaggregated visitors datafrom project destinationsand other key destinations

Description: An effective and accurate computerized system covering all visitors statistics, such as domestic and international visitors to the state, to individual

destinations and attractions, length of stay, average expenditure, source markets (from where visitors are originating), etc.

Name: Number of local Number 0.00 300.00 Bi-annual Project MIS, DoT SPCUentrepreneurs or smallbusinesses in projectdestinations supported withimproved businessdevelopment capacities,infrastructure and/or tools,disaggregated by gender andage

Description: Number of self employed individuals, professionals and small businesses (for instance, craftspeople, guides, hospitality business owners, etc.) who are

provided with business development capacities, infrastructure and/or tools by the project, disaggregated by gender.

Name: Number of Number 0.00 200.00 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCUcommunity consultationsheld in project destinations

Indicator Name Core Unit of Baseline End Target Frequency Data Source/Methodology Responsibility forMeasure Data Collection

Description: Number of community consultations held in project destinations to a) gather feedback and ideas on destination management and local economicdevelopment, b) building ownership and support for implementation of project interventions and uptake of beneficiary focused activities, c) sensitizing communities formaking behavioral changes to promote tourism and ensuring better experience for all visitors.

Name: Number of jobs Number 0.00 200.00 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCUcreated within the tourismvalue chain, especially forwomen, in projectdestinations.

Description:

Name: Number of Number 0.00 14.00 Monthly Project MIS, DoT SPCUsubproject areas declaredOpen Defacation Free (ODF)

Description: Number of sub project areas - (Kachhpura, Shahjahan Park, Taj West Gate area, Banke Bihari area, 10 Kunds areas) achieve all the requirements / guidelinesfor being declared ODF area.

Intermediate Results Indicators

Indicator Name Baseline Cumulative Target Values

YRI YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 End Target

Length of Storm Water Drains constructed /rehabilitated and made operational under the 0.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 260.00 290.00project for Greater Chennai (Kilometers).

No. of participating ULBs with new e-governancesystes opratinal.0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 30.00 60.00 90.00

systems operational.600 9.0

Proportion of new / rehabilitated water / sewerconnections achieved against aggregate target 0 0 0 0 40% 50% 60% 70%amongst participating sub-projects in these sub-sectors (Percentage).

Repayment rates on sub-loans by TNUDF toULBs (Percentage). 100.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00

Number of participating ULBs with updated GIS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 50.00 70.00 90.00mapsPercentage of participating ULBs seekinginvestment support reporting delivery of improved 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 50.00 70.00 80.00urban services in their cities.

Average Increase on MoUD Service LevelBenchmarks (SLB) Index for the 'Model Cities'related to solid waste household collectioncoverage (Percentage).

Improved ULB empowerment in the 'Model Authority A Each Each ULB . Each ULBCities' to approve government ULB has has has adopted a

capital order (G.O.) appointed disclosed its sustainabilityworks is has been a high audited plan for thelow in issued to quality financial technicalterms of raise Technical statements expert cell'sAdministr Administrati Expert for FY functions andative ve sanction Cell. 2017-18 no responsibilitieSanction to Rs. 2 later than s after the(AS) crores for September Project'spowers. Vellore and 30, 2018, closing date.

Erode, and pursuant toRs. 80 lakhs applicablefor Hosur. laws,

statutes, andrules.

Improved ULB citizen engagement in the 'Model Grievances Each ULB Each ULB Each ULBCities' are received has has met has

offline. Use implemente grievance established anof online d all the e- redressal onlinegrievance governance response platform toapplication modules as time exchangeis limited identified requireme informationbecause of by DMA. nt under its with citizenslow levels citizen regarding keyof charter in serviceawareness, 80% of deliverytechnical cases. parameters.glitches andpoorvisibility ofthe website.

Indicator Description

Project Development Objective Indicators

Data Source / Responsibility for DataIndicator Name Description (indicator definition etc.) Frequency

Methodology Collection

Direct project beneficiaries Direct beneficiaries are city residents / Annual ULB customer records / ULBs under the coordination

businesses within ULBs participating in Sample surveys / of DMA / TNUDF.

the project who directly derive benefits Independent studies, etc.

(e.g., families that have a new pipedsewer connection).

Female beneficiaries. Percentage of beneficiaries estimated to Annual ULB customer records / ULBs under the coordination

be female. Sample surveys / of DMA / TNUDF.Independent studies, etc.

Increase in Own Source Refers to own source revenue share of Annual ULB financial statements. ULBs under the coordination

Revenues (OSR) of 'Model Model Cities (comprising property of DMA / TNUDF.

Cities' in INR Crores over taxes, tariffs, local taxes, etc.) excluding

previous year with devolution from GoTN.

implementation of OSRimprovement plans.

Additional financial resource Measures non-budgetary financial Annual Status reports from TNUDF

mobilization from non- resources mobilized under the project, TNUDF.

budgetary sources through including municipal bonds, capital

credit enhancement and other contributions from beneficiaries, PPPs,means under the project. etc.

Intermediate Results Indicators

Responsibility for DataIndicator Name Description (indicator definition etc.) Frequency Data Source / Methodology Cecon

Collection

Length of Storm Water KM of storm water drains that have Semi-Annual Status / progress reports Corporation of Chennai under

Drains constructed / been constructed under the project and from Corporation of the coordination of TNUDF.

rehabilitated under the project put to use within the defined Chennai.

for Greater Chennai. geographical area of Greater Chennai.

No. of participating ULBs Number of participating ULBs that have Annual Status reports from ULBs, ULBs under the coordinationwith new e-governance successfully implemented and made disclosure of ULB financial of DMA / TNUDF.systems operational. operational new municipal e-governance statements in the public

systems under the Institutional domain, independentDevelopment component of the project. assessments, etc.

Proportion of new / Measured as the cumulative number of Semi-Annual Status reports from ULBs, ULBs under the coordinationrehabilitated water / sewer new / rehabilitated sewer or water independent assessments, of DMA / TNUDF.connections achieved by connections provided under the project etc.participating sub-projects in against the aggregate targets ofthese sub-sectors participating ULBs with water supply or(Percentage). sewerage sub-projects.

Repayment rates on sub-loans Repayment rates on sub-loans made by Annual TNUDF Financial TNUDFby TNUDF to ULBs. TNUDF to participating ULBs under the statements

project.

Number of participating Number of participating ULBs that have Annual Status reports from ULBs, ULBs under the coordinationULBs with updated GIS successfully updated GIS systems. independent assessments etc. of DMA / TNUDF.maps.

Percentage of participating Those participating ULBs that have Annual Status reports from ULBs, ULBs under the coordinationULBs seeking investment successfully commissioned sub-projects independent assessments, of DMA / TNUDF.support reporting delivery of and have started delivering an improved sample surveys, etc.improved urban services in urban service to their city residents.their cities.

Average Increase on MoUD Refers to primary collection of Annual Status reports from ULBs, ULBs under the coordinationService Level Benchmarks municipal solid waste in Model Cities. independent assessments, of DMA / TNUDF.(SLB) Index for the Model sample surveys, etc.Cities related to solid wastehousehold collection coverage(Percentage).

Improved ULB empowerment Captures outcomes related to DLIs. Year 1, 2, 4, Status reports from 'Model ULBs under the coordinationin the 'Model-Cities'. and end of Cities' and as per of DMA / Third Party

project verification protocol. Assessments.

Improved ULB citizen Captures outcomes related to DLIs. Year 2, 5, and Status reports from 'Model ULBs under the coordinationengagement in the "Model- end of nroiect Cities and as ner verification of DMA /Third Party

Cities" protocol. Assessments.