Top Banner
Seminar 2: Creating the University Town Northampton The Next Steps
117
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: UTN Seminar 2

Seminar 2: Creating the University Town NorthamptonThe Next Steps

Page 2: UTN Seminar 2

About the project

Page 3: UTN Seminar 2

Integration of the University

and Northampton

Page 4: UTN Seminar 2
Page 5: UTN Seminar 2

University Vision

“…unswerving commitment to the economic,

social and cultural success of the region.”

Creating change for the better:

Page 6: UTN Seminar 2

Impacts

• Skills;

• Social;

• Research;

• Economic;

• New development….

Page 7: UTN Seminar 2

University of Northampton Innovation Centre

Page 8: UTN Seminar 2

University of Northampton St John’s Residences

Page 9: UTN Seminar 2

University of Northampton new campus

Page 10: UTN Seminar 2
Page 11: UTN Seminar 2
Page 12: UTN Seminar 2

Waterside Impact

• Waterside Campus development, operational by 2018;

• How much ‘good stuff’ can we do when we spend £330million

building a campus?;

• How much additional funding can we lever into the County?;

• Strategic partnerships: Moulton College, NCC, NBC, NEP,

University and contractors – how many trained and employed

construction apprentices can we support through the

Waterside construction;

• How many new houses can this new work force build in the

County by 2031 (target is 80,000);

• University has a detailed social impact action plan for the

Waterside.

Page 13: UTN Seminar 2

Waterside Impact

• One new hall of residence in Northampton brings over

£750k p.a. new spend by students to the town centre

(440 students);

• What will 15,000 students and 650 staff bring to the town

centre?;

• Effect on cultural life of town?;

• Impact of University as largest organisation in Enterprise

Zone;

• Strategic projects to bring businesses to

Northamptonshire, as well as grow our own.

Page 14: UTN Seminar 2

Waterside Impact

• Significant opportunities for local SMEs in supply chains

of major contractors working on Waterside (social impact

a key element of PQQ and ITT);

• Significant opportunities for local SMEs as suppliers of

services to University when new campus is operating.

Page 15: UTN Seminar 2

Quote from the Prime Minister

“The Government is playing its part through the

Enterprise Zone and through the development of

the railway station, but what’s so exciting about

this is the amount of good work that the borough

is doing alongside the Government initiative and

the private sector is coming forward and

developing it. It you take it all together –

the Enterprise Zone, the railway station and all the projects I

saw on the on the Northampton Alive map – and also the fact

that one day the University might want to move and free up

more sites for development and change where it is in the town,

all of that is ambition, it’s drive, it’s exciting and it means

Northampton can be a success story...”

Page 16: UTN Seminar 2

Thank you

for listening

Page 17: UTN Seminar 2

Recap of previous Urban Design analysis

Page 18: UTN Seminar 2

‘Streets and public spaces are not only the settings for our everyday lives……..they can also be seen as drivers of urban prosperity.’

UN- Habitat , 2013

Urban Design Mapping and Assessment

Page 19: UTN Seminar 2

Urban Design Mapping and Assessment

Page 20: UTN Seminar 2
Page 21: UTN Seminar 2

Key Routes

Methodology:

Key routes selected using most integrated lines of movement

Data on ease of movement and other factors likely to influence route choice such as:

- Waiting time and movement data- Active passive and dead frontage- Building quality

(Jan Gehl, 2014)

Page 22: UTN Seminar 2

Route A: Beckett’s Park to Northampton StationRoute length: 1271m

Page 23: UTN Seminar 2

Route A: Walking analysisRoute length: 1271mTotal time: 1380 secs (23 mins)Stop / wait time: 215 secs (3 mins 35 secs)Stop / wait %: 15.5%

Page 24: UTN Seminar 2

Active / Passive / Dead

Route Quality: Frontage

Page 25: UTN Seminar 2

PositiveNeutralNegative

Route Quality: Buildings

Page 26: UTN Seminar 2
Page 27: UTN Seminar 2
Page 28: UTN Seminar 2
Page 29: UTN Seminar 2
Page 30: UTN Seminar 2
Page 31: UTN Seminar 2
Page 32: UTN Seminar 2
Page 33: UTN Seminar 2
Page 34: UTN Seminar 2
Page 35: UTN Seminar 2

How do people use space?(WARNING: Contains maths)

Page 36: UTN Seminar 2

Which is the easiest route between A and B?

A

B

Source: Space Syntax

Page 37: UTN Seminar 2

Shortest path/least metric distance?

A

B

Source: Space Syntax

Page 38: UTN Seminar 2

Simplest path/least angle change?

A

B

Source: Space Syntax

Page 39: UTN Seminar 2

B

Observation studies show that most people prefer simple, more direct paths over complex, indirect paths – even if the complex path is shorter.

A

B

A

Most people prefer simplest paths

Source: Space Syntax

Page 40: UTN Seminar 2

.

A way to describe space: Graph theory

Two different spatial layouts:

Two different graphs:

Source: Space Syntax

Page 41: UTN Seminar 2

Total depth =

10

01

1

1

1

22

233 0

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

6

Measuring ‘depth’ in graphs

3

4

2

3

1

2

6

5

4

30Total depth =

3

1 1

22 2

3

1 1

16

Depth is a ‘system metric’ and varies from place to place in the spatial layout.

Source: Space Syntax

Page 42: UTN Seminar 2

30

16

3

4

2

3

1

2

6

5

4

30

3

1 1

22 2

3

1 1

16

Adding colours to show ‘heat’

Using colours to represent numerical values provides an effective visualisation of simultaneous relations in spatial layouts.

Source: Space Syntax

Page 43: UTN Seminar 2

Tate Britain – Room ‘depth’ and visitors

Observed Modelled

Source: Space Syntax

Page 44: UTN Seminar 2

Some key discoveries about spaces

Page 45: UTN Seminar 2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

y = .784x + 2.147, R-squared: .589

Spatial accessibility

Pe

de

stri

an m

ove

me

nt

Spatial accessibility

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

y = 1.235x + 1.048, R-squared: .702

Ve

hic

le m

ove

me

nt

Research shows that 60-80% of movement flows are due spatial accessibility (depth)

More accessible places get more movement

Key discovery #1 Spatial layout organises movement

Source: Space Syntax

Page 46: UTN Seminar 2

Key discovery #2 Spatial layout distributes land use

Source: Space Syntax

Page 47: UTN Seminar 2

Courtesy of The TLRN Central London Pedestrian Study by Atkins

80% retail located on 20% most spatially accessible streets

Source: Space Syntax

Page 48: UTN Seminar 2
Page 49: UTN Seminar 2
Page 50: UTN Seminar 2
Page 51: UTN Seminar 2
Page 52: UTN Seminar 2

Space Syntax Analysis of Northampton

Page 53: UTN Seminar 2
Page 54: UTN Seminar 2
Page 55: UTN Seminar 2

What is it like to cycle in Northampton?

Page 56: UTN Seminar 2
Page 57: UTN Seminar 2
Page 58: UTN Seminar 2
Page 59: UTN Seminar 2
Page 60: UTN Seminar 2
Page 61: UTN Seminar 2
Page 62: UTN Seminar 2
Page 63: UTN Seminar 2

Emerging waterside campus masterplan

Page 64: UTN Seminar 2
Page 65: UTN Seminar 2
Page 66: UTN Seminar 2
Page 67: UTN Seminar 2
Page 68: UTN Seminar 2
Page 69: UTN Seminar 2
Page 70: UTN Seminar 2
Page 71: UTN Seminar 2

Form follows function: how your campus influences your

character

Page 72: UTN Seminar 2
Page 73: UTN Seminar 2
Page 74: UTN Seminar 2
Page 75: UTN Seminar 2
Page 76: UTN Seminar 2
Page 77: UTN Seminar 2
Page 78: UTN Seminar 2
Page 79: UTN Seminar 2
Page 80: UTN Seminar 2
Page 81: UTN Seminar 2
Page 82: UTN Seminar 2
Page 83: UTN Seminar 2
Page 84: UTN Seminar 2

Seminar 2: Learning from the study visit to Malmo and Copenhagen

Page 85: UTN Seminar 2

Urban Universities: Malmö and Copenhagen

Page 86: UTN Seminar 2

Malmo University;Entrance from the street

Page 87: UTN Seminar 2

Business School, University of Copenhagen:Green routes and street connections

Page 88: UTN Seminar 2

Connectivity and Town Centre Regeneration

Page 89: UTN Seminar 2

Connectivity and Town Centre Regeneration

Behind Michael Bloomberg’s long-term plan for

the city is a Danish professor and urban planner

named Jan Gehl, who for several years has been

quietly, if not slowly, guiding the remaking of New

York.

“We used to say we plan at the scale of Robert

Moses, but we judge ourselves by the standard of

Jane Jacobs,” she said. “That’s not really true

anymore. We judge ourselves now by Jan Gehl’s

standard.”

http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2010/09/468271/planyc-guru-plays-west-village-gig-sold-out

Page 90: UTN Seminar 2

Connectivity and Town Centre Regeneration

Page 91: UTN Seminar 2

Connectivity and Town Centre Regeneration

Page 92: UTN Seminar 2

Connectivity and Town Centre Regeneration

Page 93: UTN Seminar 2

Neighbourhood Renewal: Augustenborg, Malmö

Page 94: UTN Seminar 2
Page 95: UTN Seminar 2
Page 96: UTN Seminar 2
Page 97: UTN Seminar 2
Page 98: UTN Seminar 2
Page 99: UTN Seminar 2
Page 100: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extensions: Copenhagen Orestad & Malmö BoO1

Page 101: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Ørestad

Page 102: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Ørestad

Page 103: UTN Seminar 2

Orestad:

Urban extensionOf Copenhagen

Page 104: UTN Seminar 2

Malmo Bo 01:

Housing Expo and sustainable neighbourhood

Page 105: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Key Learning Points

As a district, Bo01 has succeeded in establishing quality building with the focus on the choice of materials and better integration of the landscape and urban spaces. As far as insuring the success of Bo01 is concerned the two most important documents have been the quality programme and the detail plan.

The unique thing about the quality programme was that it was initiated before the plots went on the market. The quality programme formulates a shared ambition which obliges the involved parties to guarantee quality of architectural expression, materials and technology. The detail plan specifies physical requirements concerning execution.

Monthly lectures for the developers, the municipality and other partners maintained a focus on the vision on a new district, the sustainability of which would be way above average. Compliance with the quality programme was important, although most of all it was the fact that planning became a shared learning process which ensured that the parties involved remained in step.

Page 106: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 107: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 108: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 109: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 110: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 111: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 112: UTN Seminar 2
Page 113: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 114: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 115: UTN Seminar 2

New Urban Extension: Malmö Bo01

Page 116: UTN Seminar 2
Page 117: UTN Seminar 2