Top Banner
Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC
43

Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Apr 16, 2017

Download

Technology

Bert Granberg
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project:Mapping Update

Bert GranbergUtah AGRC

Page 2: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission

• Comcast• Covad• Digis• Direct

Communications• Emery• Frontier• Gtelco

(Gunnison)• Hughes• InfoWest• Integra• Leap/Cricket• Level3• Manti• Myvocom• Nebonet• River Canyon

Wireless

• SatView• Skywire• SouthCentral• Spanish Fork• Sprint/Nextel• Strata• T-Mobile• ThreeSixty• Union• Utah Broadband• Utopia• Veracity• Verizon• Wild Blue• XOCommunications• XpressWeb

• ATC (Albion)• AllWest• Altazip• American Fiber• AT&T• Baja• Beehive• Bresnan• Cache

Broadband• Catapulsion• CentraCom• CenturyLink• Clearwire

Page 3: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Data Submissions:Service Areas, Speeds, Tech TypeInfrastructure, Anchor Institutions, etc.

Electronic Upload

Pen&

Ink

Web Conference Map Views

• April 1, 2010• October 1, 2010• April 1, 2011• October 1, 2011

Page 4: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Where does the data go?

• National Broadband Map (FCC/NTIA)

• Utah Broadband Map

• State Broadband Policy Making Planning / Business Recruitment

• Other Analysis/ Uses (data is public)

Page 5: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Ove

rall

Sta

te C

over

age

Page 6: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Ser

vice

By

Add

ress

Page 7: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Tech

nolo

gy +

Spe

ed F

ilter

: Wire

less

Page 8: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Pro

vide

r Filt

er: R

ural

Tel

ecom

s

Page 9: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Pro

vide

r Filt

er: R

ural

Tel

ecom

s

Page 10: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

10 Day Update Cycle

Page 11: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map

Page 12: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Broadband Availability Analysis

Page 13: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

2010 Census Block Data

Page 14: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Process

• For each Census Block:– How many providers serve it?– At what speed?– Using what technology(s)

• Summarize Pop. & Housing Units for– Counties– Cities– Unincorporated Named Places (ex. Brighton, Magna)

Page 15: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

“Trimmed Census Blocks”

• Only Populated Census Blocks• population and housing unit counts

• Visually ‘Trim’ Unpopulated Areas • Improved Demographic Density Capability

Before After

Page 16: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Results

Page 17: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Class #1: Basic Consumer • Case1HUPct

– Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with:

• 3 mbps+ download speeds, and • 0.768 mbps+ upload speeds

Page 18: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 19: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Class #2: Home Office/Entertainment

• Case2HUPct– Percentage of housing units within place that are

served by internet with:

• 10 mbps+ download speeds, and • 3 mbps+ upload speeds

Page 20: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 21: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mobile Wireless AvailabilityJuly 2011 Field Tests

Page 22: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Background

• Sub Contractor:– Selected through competitive bid

• Isotrope, LLC (Medfield, MA)

• Test Plan, Details testing procedures

• Test Period:– July 4th – July 23rd 2011

• What was tested:– CDMA, EVDO, GSM, GPRS/EDGE/UMTS, HSPA & LTE– Comparable consumer grade ‘smart phones’ from 6 carriers– ZK Test’s ZK SAMp test/logging platform

Page 23: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Goals

• Goals:

– Obtain footprint for different mobile bb technologies• Verification of mobile bb provider data submissions• Inferred voice availability

– Gather performance data for typical ‘consumer experience’

• Signal strength• Speed

Page 24: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes

Page 25: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Drive Testing, July 4 – July 23, 2010

• 9328 miles driven 7 million observation pts• 50 Gb of data thru put• 3 road closures• 1 gas outage…0 speeding tickets

Page 26: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology

Page 27: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Signal Strength

A function of:• Tower distance• Antennae direction• Obstruction• Environment• Power levels• Congestion

Page 28: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Down/Up Link Speed

A function of:• Signal Strength• Tech/Protocol• Congestion• Transaction length

Page 29: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation

April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless

April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage+

Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch

Page 30: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

May 2011: • 421000 points• 11 complete counties• 3 partial counties

Building Statewide Address Points Using Statewide Address Points

July 2011• Address Pts in used by statewide geocoding web service

• PSAPs, esp. Regional Dispatch

• SST/MTSA

• Statewide Voters DB

Maintaining Statewide Address Points Address Point Standards

• Addressing Stnrd Data Model

• Address System !

• Tiered

• Keep it Simple !

Voters DB Feedback Loop:• Clerks• Integrated Map & Web Services• Web Service Δ Reports

PSAPs, 911 Comm.

vote

Address Points

Page 31: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation
Page 32: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology

Page 33: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Competition

• TwoPlusHUPct– Percentage of housing units within county that have 2

or more providers offering services

Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet

Page 34: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 35: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Class #3: Higher Capacity

• Case3HUPct– Percentage of housing units within place that are

served by internet with:

• 25 mbps+ download speeds, and • 10 mbps+ upload speeds

Page 36: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 37: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

ServicesClasses

Map

Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas

Page 38: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapped Broadband Technologies

Page 39: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mobile Availability

• MobileHUPct– Percentage of housing units within county that have

broadband qualifying mobile wireless service

Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet

Page 40: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 41: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Unserved

• UnservHUPct– Percentage of housing units within county that DO

NOT have broadband qualifying service

• < 0.768 mbps download speeds, and • < 0.200 mbps upload speeds

Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet

UnservHUPct

Page 42: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 43: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Fall 2011 Mapping Initiatives

• Interactive Map– Addition of Community Anchor Institutions

• Highlight capability within Rural Areas– Generalized Speed Test “weather map” ??

• Explore Business Recruitment-oriented infrastructure map concept– Fiber-served backbone served areas– Redundancy

• Address Point dataset grants to counties• Sharing mobile drive test data to respective providers

and partners (Public Safety, etc)