Using the BOLD MR signal to differentiate the stereoisomers of ketamine in the rat Clare L. Littlewood, a, * Diana Cash, a Aisling L. Dixon, a Sophie L. Dix, b Craig T. White, b Michael J. O’Neill, b Mark Tricklebank, b and Steven C.R. Williams a a King’s College London, Neuroimaging Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, PO42 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK b Eli Lilly and Co. Ltd., Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6PH, UK Received 6 January 2006; revised 10 April 2006; accepted 3 May 2006 Available online 11 July 2006 Rationale: Ketamine is a chiral molecule that is reported to model aspects of schizophrenia. Objectives: To investigate the stereospecificity of the isomers of ketamine using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) in order to further understand ketamine’s pharmacodynamic actions. Method: Responses to 25 mg kg À1 S(+) isomer, R(À) isomer and racemic ketamine in independent groups of Sprague – Dawley rats were investigated using a prepulse inhibition paradigm, locomotor observa- tions, MRI and 2-deoxyglucose techniques. Results: Racemic ketamine and the S(+) isomer were both capable of disrupting sensorimotor gating as measured using prepulse inhibition and produced a longer period of hyperlocomotion comparative to the R(À) isomer. In contrast, large alterations in the BOLD MR signal were observed with R(À) isomer, whereas S(+) isomer and racemate precipitated more localized BOLD signal changes predominantly in cortical, hippocampal and hindbrain regions. Glucose utilization rates in conscious animals are in agreement with previously published data and verify the BOLD responses in the racemic group. However, no significant changes in glucose utilization were observed in the anesthetized cohort. Conclusions: Ketamine and its isomers have stereospecific effects on sensorimotor gating and locomotion that correlate with the enantiom- er’s affinity for the NMDA receptor. It would appear that anesthesia, as required for preclinical MRI procedures, may interact with and potentially attenuate the drug’s response. Although analysis of the main effect of isomers in comparison to each other or the racemate offers an alternative analysis method that should be less susceptible to anesthetic interactions, only the R(À) isomer comparative to the racemate offers significant differences of interest. D 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction Ketamine hydrochloride is a well known sedative and psychomimetic agent which is believed to exert its effects via non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonism (Anis et al., 1983; Duncan et al., 1999; Lodge and Johnson, 1990). At subanesthetic doses, ketamine is purported to model a variety of the symptoms associated with schizophrenia (Breier et al., 1997; Duncan et al., 2001; Krystal et al., 1999). In rodents, racemic ketamine can disrupt sensorimotor gating (Mansbach et al., 2001), a process known to be disrupted in schizophrenics (Braff et al., 2001), as measured with a prepulse inhibition (PPI) paradigm. Ketamine also precipitates hyperlocomotion in rodents, thought to be a model of psychosis (Carlsson and Carlsson, 1990; Corbett et al., 1995). Ketamine has a chiral center and as such is made up of the two ‘‘mirror image’’ optical isomers, S (+) and R(À), named after their rotation of polarized light. Although both compounds possess the same constituent groups, their positions in space allow different 3- dimensional interactions with their environment which can alter their underlying pharmacology. In vivo and in vitro work has elucidated that the S(+) isomer has a much higher affinity for the phencyclidine (PCP) site on the NMDA receptor (Klepstad et al., 1990; Oye et al., 1992) as well as A and n opioid receptors (Hirota et al., 1999; Hustveit et al., 1995). Ex vivo experimentation has also elucidated stereospecific effects upon dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens (Hancock and Stamford, 1999) and caudate putamen (Nishimura and Sato, 1999) of the rat. These experiments suggest that S (+) isomer has a greater potency to mobilize DA storage pools presynaptically in the nucleus accumbens whereas the S (+) isomer is believed to act stereoselectively upon blockade of DA uptake in the caudate putamen. In vitro studies have also demonstrated that S (+) isomer is up to eight times more potent at inhibiting DA transporters than the R(À) form (Nishimura and Sato, 1999). In contrast, the R(À) isomer shows a higher degree of affinity for the j site (Klepstad et al., 1990). In addition, R(À) isomer displayed stereoselective enhancement of serotonin (5HT) efflux in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Tso et al., 2004). No 1053-8119/$ - see front matter D 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.022 * Corresponding author. Fax: +44 20 7919 2116. E-mail address: [email protected](C.L. Littlewood). Available online on ScienceDirect (www.sciencedirect.com). www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733 – 1746
14
Embed
Using the BOLD MR signal to differentiate the stereoisomers of ketamine in the rat
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg
NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733 – 1746
Using the BOLD MR signal to differentiate the stereoisomers of
ketamine in the rat
Clare L. Littlewood,a,* Diana Cash,a Aisling L. Dixon,a Sophie L. Dix,b Craig T. White,b
Michael J. O’Neill,b Mark Tricklebank,b and Steven C.R. Williamsa
aKing’s College London, Neuroimaging Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, PO42 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UKbEli Lilly and Co. Ltd., Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6PH, UK
Received 6 January 2006; revised 10 April 2006; accepted 3 May 2006
Available online 11 July 2006
Rationale: Ketamine is a chiral molecule that is reported to model
aspects of schizophrenia.
Objectives: To investigate the stereospecificity of the isomers of
ketamine using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI)
in order to further understand ketamine’s pharmacodynamic actions.
Method: Responses to 25 mg kg�1 S(+) isomer, R(�) isomer and
racemic ketamine in independent groups of Sprague–Dawley rats were
investigated using a prepulse inhibition paradigm, locomotor observa-
tions, MRI and 2-deoxyglucose techniques.
Results: Racemic ketamine and the S(+) isomer were both capable of
disrupting sensorimotor gating as measured using prepulse inhibition
and produced a longer period of hyperlocomotion comparative to the
R(�) isomer. In contrast, large alterations in the BOLD MR signal
were observed with R(�) isomer, whereas S(+) isomer and racemate
precipitated more localized BOLD signal changes predominantly in
cortical, hippocampal and hindbrain regions. Glucose utilization rates
in conscious animals are in agreement with previously published data
and verify the BOLD responses in the racemic group. However, no
significant changes in glucose utilization were observed in the
anesthetized cohort.
Conclusions: Ketamine and its isomers have stereospecific effects on
sensorimotor gating and locomotion that correlate with the enantiom-
er’s affinity for the NMDA receptor. It would appear that anesthesia, as
required for preclinical MRI procedures, may interact with and
potentially attenuate the drug’s response. Although analysis of the
main effect of isomers in comparison to each other or the racemate
offers an alternative analysis method that should be less susceptible to
anesthetic interactions, only the R(�) isomer comparative to the
racemate offers significant differences of interest.
D 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1053-8119/$ - see front matter D 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–17461734
stereoselectivity is apparent at acetyl choline receptors (Durieux
and Nietgen, 1997; Sasaki et al., 2000) or noradrenaline and
serotonin transporter proteins (Nishimura and Sato, 1999).
At equimolar, subanesthetic doses, the S(+) isomer is a better
analgesic and causes more perceptual disturbances than the R(�)form (Klepstad et al., 1990; Mathisen et al., 1995; Oye et al., 1992;
Vollenweider et al., 1997). A deeper level of anesthesia is achieved
with the S(+) thanwithR(�) isomer as indicated by its greater ability
to slow down EEGwaves in man (Schuttler et al., 1987;White et al.,
1985). The psychic emergence reactions at these doses are reported
to be equivalent for both isomers (White et al., 1985). The potential
of S(+) isomer to produce perceptual disturbances and analgesia
correlates with its stereoselectivity at the PCP binding site (Klepstad
et al., 1990) and with ketamine’s ability to suppress spontaneous
calcium oscillations, believed to be initiated by calcium’s entry
through NMDA receptors (Sinner et al., 2005). It is therefore widely
believed that the NMDA receptor mediates these properties of
ketamine at both subanesthetic and anesthetic doses.
Early studies investigating ketamine precipitated hyperlocomo-
tion (Ryder et al., 1978) suggest a rank order of potency equivalent
to that of psychotic symptoms in man. As publications discussing
the effects of the ketamine isomers upon the behavioral responses
of the rodent are sparse, one of the purposes of the current
publication was to further investigate the effects of the isomers of
ketamine upon PPI and locomotion, which are both common
testing paradigms used in models of schizophrenia. Further to this,
the neuronal origins of these behaviors would be most interesting.
Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal originates from
the fact that there is an overcompensation in blood flow to an
activated area, thus decreasing the paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin
concentration and altering the local magnetic field (Bandettini et
al., 1992; Ogawa et al., 1992). Examining the neural actions of
drugs by measuring BOLD signal changes is a popular technique
(Leslie and James, 2000; Salmeron and Stein, 2002) and has been
used to investigate a variety of compounds including sulpiride
(Preece et al., 2001), ketamine (Burdett et al., 1995), quinelorane
(Ireland et al., 2005), MK-801 (Houston et al., 2001), amphetamine
(Dixon et al., 2005) and heroin (Xu et al., 2000). The major
advantage of such a technique is that it allows in vivo imaging of
the whole brain non-invasively.
Using PPI and hyperlocomotion to verify the face and
predictive validity of ketamine isomers to model some of the
symptomatology of schizophrenia, it was hypothesized that BOLD
contrast could be utilized to further investigate the stereospecific
effects of ketamine. We were expecting BOLD activation to
correlate with the psychotic profile of the isomers as measured with
locomotor testing. Although ketamine has been previously
investigated with in vivo neuroimaging techniques in rodents
(Burdett et al., 1995), the enantiomers of this drug have never been
investigated in such a manner. In fact, we purport that this is the
first communication of ‘‘chiral’’ phMRI. Further to this, the
comparison of the isomers with the racemic mixture offers a new
technique to analyze the stereospecificity of a drug, regardless of
any systemic or anesthetic interactions.
As the employment of phMRI to investigate chiral interactions
of drugs is a novel technique, the established neuroimaging
technique for the quantification of glucose utilization rates, namely14C-2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) autoradiography, was also undertaken
in a separate cohort of animals. This technique allows the glucose
utilization rate of brain regions to be quantified by the use of a
radioactive analogue of glucose.
Materials and methods
All experiments were conducted to comply with the Animals
(Experimental Procedures) Act, 1986, and the local ethical
requirements. Male adult Sprague–Dawley rats were used in four
separate experiments: PPI investigations (40 animals, 280 T 11 g
[mean T SD], Harlan, UK), locomotor testing (40 animals, 319 T25 g [mean T SD], Charles River, UK), phMRI (40 animals, 306 T20 g [mean T SD], Charles River, UK) and 2-DG experimentation
(38 animals, 319 T 20 g [mean T SD], Charles River, UK). Animals
were housed in groups of 3–5 prior to the start of experiments in a
temperature-controlled environment (20–22-C) with food and
water available ad libitum.
Pure enantiomers of ketamine hydrochloride (Sigma, UK) were
isolated using semi-preparative HPLC. The column was a 15 cm �21.2 mm Chiralcel OJ-H (Chiral Technologies), the mobile phase
was 85% heptane, 15% ethanol each with 0.2% isopropylamine
and the flow rate 25 ml min�1. Column loading for each injection
was approximately 70 mg. Fractions were collected by UV
detection at 260 nm.
For all experiments, solutions were freshly prepared at the start
of each test day. For the PPI experiments, racemic ketamine
solutions were prepared in 5% glucose and the enantiomers were
dissolved in sterile water with the pH adjusted as described below.
In this case, 5% glucose was used for the vehicle group. For all
other experiments, ketamine and its isomers were dissolved in a
solution of 0.9% saline and 1 M HCl, with the pH adjusted to 5–7
using 1 M NaOH before injection; 0.9% saline was utilized for the
vehicle group. Animals received doses subcutaneously (sc) 1 ml
kg�1 doses of either 25 mg kg�1 ketamine racemate, 25 mg kg�1
S(+) isomer, 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer or vehicle. An additional
group was included in the PPI investigations which received 3 mg
kg�1 of the competitive NMDA antagonist, SDZ 220,581 (Tocris,
UK) dissolved in 5% glucose and equimolar NaOH.
Prepulse inhibition
PPI testing was conducted within sound-attenuated startle
chambers controlled by SDI software (SR-LAB, San Diego
Instruments, CA). Acoustic impulses could be delivered via a
speaker, and movement was recorded using a piezoelectric
accelerometer. The amplitude of the whole body startle to an
acoustic pulse was defined as the maximum of 100 one-
millisecond accelerometer readings collected from pulse onset.
Each animal underwent a habituation session 24 h before the
experiment commenced. This consisted of a 15 min period of white
noise at 75 dB followed by eight startle trials (40 ms of 120 dB).
Results from these startle trials were used to create matched
treatment groups. On the day of testing, animals were administered
(P < 0.01) and 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer (P < 0.05) as
significantly different from the vehicle group. No other dosage
groups were found to be significantly different from any other. To
inspect which time points were different from vehicle in the drug-
administered groups, post hoc independent t tests (P < 0.05; or
Mann–Whitney U, dependent on equality of variances) identified
that both the 25 mg kg�1 ketamine racemate and S(+) isomer
were significantly different from vehicle until 60 min post-
injection. However, the group administered 25 mg kg�1 R(�)isomer differed from the control group until only 40 min post-
injection.
Pharmacological MRI
The stereospecificity and differences between the effects of the
two isomers are obvious from the BOLD contrast maps (Fig. 3).
Increases in BOLD signal were observed in a number of brain
regions following 25 mg kg�1 ketamine racemate administration
(Fig. 3A). Correlation of cortical areas including the cingulate,
somatosensory and retrosplenial cortex with the locomotor input
function is apparent with 25 mg kg�1 ketamine. There is also some
evidence of hippocampal, thalamic, hindbrain and cerebellar
BOLD signal changes following ketamine racemate injection.
SPM maps derived from the 25 mg kg�1 S(+) isomer dataset
suggest a similar activation profile, particularly in limbic regions
but with reduced BOLD contrast in hindbrain and frontal areas
(Fig. 3B).
on locomotor activity in Sprague–Dawley rats (left panel) and the paradigm
right panel). Total distance moved in 10 min is displayed as group means
g�1 S(+) isomer vs. saline; # P < 0.05 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer vs. saline as
ariances is violated).
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–17461738
The 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer displayed large changes in
BOLD contrast covering nearly the entire brain area imaged (Fig.
3C). To ensure that these changes were not derived as a result of
using an input function based on the racemic locomotor profile,
an input paradigm modeled on the locomotion curve for the 25
mg kg�1 R(�) isomer group was used in a separate analysis and
Fig. 4. Temperature (top left), pulse (bottom left) and respiration (top right) measurements collected during the functional MR imaging protocol. Values were
collected every minute from a subset of animals undergoing scanning and averaged into 10 min time blocks. The graph displays these means T standard error ofthe mean. No significant differences were observed between groups.
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–1746 1739
was found to make a negligible difference to the resultant SPM
map.
Further analyses of the main effect of the isomers in respect to
the racemate and each other were also undertaken. Negligible
BOLD contrast changes were observed in the S(+) isomer group in
comparison to racemate (Fig. 3E) or S(+) isomer in comparison
with R(�) isomer (Fig. 3F). However, this further analysis
highlighted the stereospecific effect of 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer
within the nucleus accumbens (Fig. 3D). An analysis such as this
helps reduce systemic influences on BOLD contrast as both the
racemate and isomers should affect the physiology and anesthesia
of an animal in a similar pattern that may not be paralleled in a
vehicle group.
There were no significant changes in the physiology of the
animals post-injection. Physiological datawere not available for post
hoc analysis from all animals, but pulse measurements were
recorded for at least 7 animals in each group. However, there
appeared to be a depression of pulse post-ketamine or its enantiomers
that was not apparent in the vehicle group (Fig. 4). No significant
differences in the global brain signal were identified, suggesting no
global differences between drug and vehicle groups (Fig. 5F).
Fig. 3. SPM{t} distribution maps representing BOLD signal change overlaid on
represent significant correlation (thresholded at P < 0.05 corrected for multiple com
in comparison to vehicle animals. Red represents positive correlation, blue represen
racemate (t > 4.38) with locomotor profile (Fig. 2, right panel, 110 min) compared w
with locomotor profile compared with saline. (C) Correlations of 25 mg kg�1 R
Correlations of 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer with locomotor time course compared wi
S(+) isomer with locomotor time course compared with 25 mg kg�1 ketamine racem
time course compared with 25 mg kg�1 S(+) isomer (t > 4.3).
ROI analysis further illustrated the similarity in the response to
both S(+) and racemic ketamine in cortical areas (Fig. 5B). Signal
intensity changes were not large, but the temporal course produced
show definite alterations between drug and saline administration in
the nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, cortex and ventricles (Figs.
5A–D). No differences were observed in an area that was designated
as not activated as a consequence of the SPM{t} maps produced
(Fig. 5E).
Glucose utilization measurements
In agreement with previous publications (Crosby et al., 1982;
Duncan et al., 1999; Miyamoto et al., 2000), one-way analysis of
variance identified a large number of brain areas with signifi-
cantly altered cerebral rate of glucose utilization (GU) after 25
mg kg�1 ketamine racemate in conscious rats (Fig. 6, top). Areas
with altered GU after racemic ketamine include: cingulate cortex,
ate (t > 4.37). (F) Correlations of 25 mg kg�1 R(�) isomer with locomotor
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–17461740
To further investigate the influence of anesthesia upon glucose
utilization and any potential alteration of neurovascular coupling,
GU was also investigated under the same anesthetic regimen as
the phMRI experiment. No significant changes in glucose
utilization were found in any of the brain regions studied (Fig.
6, bottom).
Discussion
The aim of this study was to utilize a recent imaging method
(phMRI) to observe the effects of racemic ketamine, as well as
the stereospecificity of the isomers which correlated with a
behavioral input function. In addition, endeavors were made to
validate these results using behavior and autoradiography.
Although interesting differences in the BOLD contrast profiles
Fig. 5. Time course of signal intensity in six regions of interest (ROIs) as presente
All signal intensities have been scaled to arbitrary units and grand mean scaled to t
are displayed as group means (TSEM) over 10 min intervals.
obtained for the isomers and racemate comparative to saline were
observed, little difference was found for the isomers in
comparison with each other. Furthermore, the neuronal origin
of the BOLD signal could not be conclusively verified using GU
measurements.
It is purported that this is the first communication of isomeric
differences in the disruption of sensorimotor gating by ketamine.
As can be visualized in Fig. 1, S(+) isomer, racemic ketamine and
the competitive NMDA antagonist SDZ 220,581 produce disrup-
tion of PPI. The inclusion of the SDZ 220,581 dosing group
provided a positive assay control that may suggest NMDA
antagonism involvement in the PPI disruption elicited by ketamine
and its isomers. These results also suggest that ketamine, and to
varying degrees its isomers, can model the sensorimotor gating
deficits observed in schizophrenic patients. However, this is a very
complicated arena insomuch that ketamine appears unable to
d overlaid onto the co-registered spin echo anatomical template (left panel).
he mean of the baseline (0–30 min) of each time series. Signal time courses
Fig. 5 (continued).
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–1746 1741
disrupt PPI in healthy volunteers (Abel et al., 2003; Duncan et al.,
2001).
Investigation of the hyperlocomotion precipitated by ketamine
and its isomers in the current study has displayed a similar profile
between all the ketamine forms, though lasting for a shorter time
period when the R(�) isomer is administered. However, no
significant differences were observed between the different chiral
forms of ketamine whereas all ketamine isoforms were signifi-
cantly different from vehicle. Although the locomotor profile
described in this paper complements previous work carried out
with the enantiomers of ketamine (Ryder et al., 1978), no
significant stereospecific effects of the isomers can be reported in
contrast to work carried out in mice, where the S(+) isomer was
found to be more psychomimetic than the R(�) isomer as
measured using ataxia, head weaving and c-fos expression
(Nishizawa et al., 2000). Although hyperlocomotion is often
used as a model of psychosis, it must be noted that non-psychotic
agents are also capable of eliciting hyperlocomotor activity
(Grottick et al., 2000).
In contrast to its lesser effect on locomotor behavior,
administration of the R(�) isomer affected a much larger cerebral
BOLD contrast response than was observed with either the
racemate or the S(+) isomer in comparison to vehicle. On the
other hand, the similarity of the SPM maps derived from data
collected after the S(+) isomer or racemic drug is striking. If the
data from selected ROIs (Fig. 5) are studied, the similarity of the
temporal signal profiles between the S(+) isomer and racemate,
especially in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, adds further
weight to this observation. These results are also consistent with
our previous study (Littlewood et al., 2006, in press) in which
cortical and hippocampal areas were found to be activated by 25
mg kg�1 racemic ketamine. In this previous study, however,
limbic areas including the nucleus accumbens and ventral
pallidum were also found to have correlation with the locomotor
Fig. 6. Quantitative 2-deoxyglucose uptake (Amol 100 g�1 min�1) across a variety of regions of interest in Sprague–Dawley rats. Data are expressed as group
means (TSEM). The top figure displays glucose utilization in conscious restrained animals after 25 mg kg�1 ketamine racemate subcutaneously, whereas the
bottom chart displays glucose utilization in isoflurane anesthetized rats after 25 mg kg�1 ketamine racemate and its isomers subcutaneously. *P < 0.05
ketamine racemate comparative to saline; **P < 0.001 ketamine racemate comparative to saline.
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–17461742
input paradigm. It is imperative to remember that BOLD
responses are being compared to the saline-injected ‘‘control’’
group. Even under anesthesia, we cannot conclusively argue that
identical brain activation profiles will be evident in both the
control groups. Therefore, the BOLD contrasts obtained will be
influenced by these potentially differing ‘‘baseline’’ states. These
differences may also originate from the slightly different input
profiles used for the two analyses as well as the different time
courses investigated (110 min vs. 150 min) and potential
anesthetic interactions discussed in detail later.
Furthermore, it would appear from the signal intensity
graphs (Fig. 5) that ketamine administration acted to attenuate
the trend for a decline in signal intensity that can be clearly
seen in all groups in the baseline state rather than cause an
elevation in signal intensity. This may suggest a potential
decline in the physiological status of the animal not detected by
the monitoring system employed or scanner drift that is being
counteracted by administration of ketamine. In addition, it
substantiates the hypothesis of anesthetic interaction in the
phMRI protocol.
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–1746 1743
GU was also calculated after a racemic dose of ketamine (Fig.
6, top), and an agreement was found with previous studies (Crosby
et al., 1982; Duncan et al., 1999; Miyamoto et al., 2000).
Significant alterations in GU were observed in a variety of brain
regions studied. Many of these areas correlate with the areas
displaying altered BOLD contrast, including hippocampal areas,
retrosplenial cortex, anterior cingulate, thalamic areas and somato-
sensory cortex. In contrast, GU calculations undertaken in
isoflurane anesthetized rodents lacked any significant findings.
This may suggest interaction of the anesthetic paradigm with GU
or potential dissociation of activation–metabolism coupling
mechanisms, especially in light of work carried out in humans
that observed psychomimetic effects and metabolic hyperfrontality
in awake, healthy volunteers administered S(+) isomer whereas a
state of relaxation and decreased GU in the temporomedial cortex
and left insula were reported after the R(�) isomer (Vollenweider
et al., 1997). However, the existence of significant BOLD contrast
changes in the absence of GU alterations after ketamine and its
isomers may suggest that changes in activity are being attenuated
by the anesthetic agent employed so that only small modulations
are occurring. These are too small to be detected by GU techniques
but are visible as small, though significant alterations in BOLD
contrast. It could also be purported that BOLD contrast changes
originate from blood flow effects that are not necessarily coupled
to brain activation.
Unlike the S(+) isomer and racemate, R(�) isomer produced
large BOLD signal changes across most of the brain. Systemic
origins for this large signal cannot be totally excluded, although an
ROI placed within a non-activated area (Fig. 5E) shows no drug
response, indicating that this large BOLD contrast may not be a
systemic effect. It might be hypothesized that the reduced NMDA
antagonism expected with this equimolar dose of R(�) isomer may
be causing less of an interaction with the anesthetic agent
isoflurane (see below). As ketamine-induced cerebral blood flow
changes have been shown to be related to neuronal activation in
rats and man (Cavazzuti et al., 1987; Langsjo et al., 2003, 2004), it
may be assumed that, although the changes observed are
widespread, they are neuronally related.
Another possibility to explain the large BOLD signal changes
observed in the R(�) isomer group is the slower hepatic clearance
of R(�) isomer relative to the S(+) enantiomer (Kharasch and
Labroo, 1992) and the differential metabolite concentrations of the
2 isomers in plasma and brain fractions (Marietta et al., 1977;
Ryder et al., 1978). The differential pharmacokinetics of the
isomers may alter the receptor binding kinetics of the isomers, and
thus the temporal neuronal characteristics may reflect this potential
longer, though less robust, receptor binding within the R(�) isomer
group. To help further elucidate the differential neuronal activation
profiles of the isomers, it would be of interest to replicate the
current study using equianalgesic doses.
For MRI studies to be conducted in rodents, anesthesia or
sedation is usually required in order to reduce motion artefacts.
Thus, in this study, we used low doses of the inhalation anesthetic
isoflurane throughout the imaging session. At higher doses, such as
100 mg kg�1, ketamine (we used 25 mg kg�1 ketamine in the
current study) itself acts as an anesthetic and so there is a
possibility for interaction between ketamine and the other
anesthetic agents. In this case, isoflurane has been utilized in
order to allow non-invasive sedation with the potential for repeated
anesthesia. Isoflurane has been reported to increase the local charge
transfer at GABAergic synapses and decrease charge transfer at
glutamatergic synapses in rat hippocampal cultures (de Sousa et al.,
2000). Added to evidence that ketamine anesthesia can be
potentiated using GABA agonists muscimol and diazepam in mice
(Irifune et al., 2000), it may be postulated that isoflurane
administration may attenuate cerebral responses to subanesthetic
doses of ketamine, potentially via a GABAergic mechanism. Even
though there is no evidence that isoflurane interacts directly with
the NMDA receptor, there is evidence that it can alter glutama-
tergic transmission probably by a presynaptic mechanism (Berg-
Johnsen and Langmoen, 1992; Maclver et al., 1996; Pearce et al.,
1989). Therefore, it is possible that isoflurane may interact with
ketamine via either the GABA or glutamate neurotransmitter
systems. Halothane, an inhalation anesthetic pharmacologically
similar to isoflurane, was found to suppress the ketamine-induced
expression of c-fos in the posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex;
preliminary results with isoflurane suggested an equivalent
attenuation (Nakao et al., 1996). In agreement with these findings,
we found no changes in GU in isoflurane-anesthetized rats, after
ketamine or its isomers.
A possible interaction of isoflurane and ketamine via the
dopaminergic system is also another consideration for this study.
Ketamine has actually been reported to have a greater affinity for the
high-affinity D2 receptor than the NMDA receptor (Seeman et al.,
2005). and isoflurane is also known to inhibit the high affinity state
of the D2 receptor (Seeman and Kapur, 2003). Work is ongoing
within the laboratory to replicate these studies using alpha-
chloralose sedation, although interactions may still not be excluded.
There were no significant differences between the groups in the
physiological parameters (Fig. 4). Therefore, it is unlikely that any
physiological effects of these compounds significantly interfered
with the observed cerebral BOLD contrast changes. A phMRI
investigation of cocaine and its derivative cocaine methiodide
(which cannot cross the blood brain barrier but produces equivalent
cardiovascular effects), in which both compounds significantly
altered blood pressure but only cocaine produced meaningful
BOLD contrast changes (Luo et al., 2003), indicates that blood
pressure has little influence on BOLD signal. The BOLD signal
changes calculated here are small, but the areas which display
significant correlation with the locomotor profile of racemic
ketamine are areas which have been previously identified to be
of interest in the acute profile of ketamine (Burdett et al., 1995;
Duncan et al., 1999; Olney et al., 1991). Inhalation anesthetics
have previously been used successfully both within our group
(Cash et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2005; Roberts, 2004) and by other
laboratories (Dixon et al., 2005; Hewitt et al., 2005; Steward et al.,
2004) to investigate BOLD responses to CNS-active compounds.
Therefore, it is proposed that, although the S(+) isomer and
ketamine racemate display BOLD signal changes in brain areas of
interest, the interaction with anesthesia limits any conclusions
derived from this work.
A visual examination of the 2-DG results (Fig. 6, bottom)
suggests a trend, albeit non-significant, for the S(+) isomer and
racemate to have reduced glucose utilization, whereas the R(�)isomer has very similar effects to the control group. It has been
previously reported that intrathecal application of S(+) isomer or
racemic ketamine could potentiate morphine analgesia at doses
that did not cause motor impairment, whereas the R(�) isomer
could not (Joo et al., 2000). It could be that, in our study, due to
its lesser interaction with anesthesia, R(�) isomer has a greater
psychotic-like activity resulting in the widespread BOLD
response. A large BOLD response to a psychostimulant has
C.L. Littlewood et al. / NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1733–17461744
previously been reported by an alternative laboratory using
amphetamine challenge (Dixon et al., 2005), further validating
this hypothesis.
At equimolar doses, the S(+) isomer produces a prolonged
hyperlocomotor response. However, at equianalgesic doses, R(�)isomer is actually more potent (Marietta et al., 1977; Ryder et al.,
1978). It may be that the relative NMDA blockade between the
different molecules in sedated animals has a more equianalgesic
profile rather than the equimolar response observed in conscious
animals. The stereospecific interactions of R(�) isomer with other
receptor subtypes other than the NMDA receptor must also be
considered. For example, R(�) isomer has been demonstrated to
stereoselectively interact with j recognition sites (Klepstad et al.,
1990). It may be that the large correlation of BOLD contrast with
the locomotor input paradigm may be related to the isomer’s jreceptor affinity. j ligands have been previously been shown to be
able to attenuate hyperlocomotion elicited by cocaine and
amphetamine, suggesting that j receptors have a role in locomotor
activity (Hascoet et al., 1995; McCracken et al., 1999). Using a
behavioral covariate of interest within the BOLD analysis method
offers a useful strategy to identify changes in BOLD contrast
changes that correlate with the behavioral time course of the drug.
However, signal intensity changes elicited by ketamine that deviate
from that of the locomotor input function could be inadvertently
missed. Furthermore, the locomotor input profile was derived from
data collected in the conscious rather than anesthetized state. With
the anesthetic interaction that seems apparent in the current study,
the use of an input function in MRI analysis that has not been
obtained in an anesthetized cohort may be questioned. However,
the premise of the current study was to identify BOLD contrast
changes that correlated with the time course of induced psychosis
as previously discussed (Littlewood et al., 2006).
To eliminate the confounding effect of anesthesia in this study,
a further analysis of phMRI data was undertaken. This involved
contrasting the isomers to the racemate rather than the vehicle
group to identify stereoselective responses. In such an analysis, as
animals are more physiologically comparable, a greater confidence
can be placed on the neuronal origin of signal changes. However, it
is unknown what interactions the S(+) and R(�) isomers may have
with each other in the racemic mixture, thus complicating
interpretation of an analysis of this nature. Negligible BOLD
contrast changes were observed with S(+) isomer comparative to
racemate (Fig. 3E) and the S(+) isomer comparative to the R(�)isomer (Fig. 3F). Therefore, although large differences exist in the
BOLD contrast profiles of the different enantiomers when
compared to vehicle, negligible statistical differences can be
observed when the isomers are directly compared, helping to
further illustrate the complex interactions the isomers of ketamine
have with each other.
However, correlation with the locomotor input function was
identified in the nucleus accumbens of the R(�) isomer group, with
respect to the racemate (Fig. 3D). As the analysis was probing for
brain regions correlating with the behavioral response of the
compound, this area would not be unexpected as the nucleus
accumbens is believed to be involved in ketamine-induced hyper-
locomotion (Hunt et al., 2005; Irifune et al., 1991). Given that
ligands of j receptors can produce responses similar to those of
ketamine (Brent, 1991) and are believed to influence the nucleus
accumbens (Guitart and Farre, 1998), the observed BOLD contrast
may be partially related to R(�) isomer’s affinity for the j receptor
(Klepstad et al., 1990). Moreover, certain j antagonists have
shortened NMDA-antagonist-induced cognitive dysfunction and
hyperlocomotion in rats (Maj et al., 1996; Ogawa et al., 1994).
These antagonists can also block cocaine-induced c-fos expression
in the nucleus accumbens (Maurice and Romieu, 2004) and
ketamine-induced c-fos expression in the posterior cingulate/
retrosplenial cortex (Nakao et al., 2002). No normal physiological
function of the j receptor is known, but it would appear that this
class of receptor is involved in psychotropic drug responses
(Debonnel and de Montigny, 1996). In fact, j receptor binding has
been shown to be reduced in post-mortem schizophrenic brain
samples, adding further evidence for j receptor involvement in
psychosis (Helmeste et al., 1996).
Conclusions
The stereoselectivity of the ketamine enantiomers has been
investigated using PPI, hyperlocomotion and phMRI techniques.
PPI identified the S(+) isomer as a potent sensorimotor disrupting
agent, and locomotor activity demonstrated the potential psychot-
ic activity of all the ketamine isoforms. However, the BOLD
contrast results reported here suggest an interaction with the
required anesthesia profile that has been substantiated using 2-DG
autoradiography. Although this anesthetic confound may limit the
interpretation of the results, phMRI can be potentially utilized to
identify stereospecific effects of isomers, a method first described
here. Furthermore, it is purported that comparison of the isomers
of ketamine with the racemate, rather than the vehicle group, may
offer an alternative method to investigate isomeric differences
while minimizing any anesthetic interaction.
Acknowledgments
This research was generously funded by a BBSRC CASE
studentship in collaboration with Eli Lilly and Co. The University
of London Intercollegiate Research Service scheme permitted
access to the MR imaging spectrometer located at Queen Mary
College London where it is managed by Dr. Alasdair Preston.
Preliminary data relating to this study have been previously
presented at the British Association of Psychopharmacology
Summer Meeting 2005 and the Society for Neuroscience 35th