Top Banner
SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions? Can the managed landscape ever return to “historic conditions SIMPPLLE k was originally done in Feb 04, modifications made to show ntial to address cumulative impacts
16

Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Dec 13, 2015

Download

Documents

Lester Anderson
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Using SIMPPLLE to address questions:Has our management altered how a landscape is developing?How would a landscape have changed without our actions?Can the managed landscape ever return to “historic conditions”

SIMPPLLE*Work was originally done in Feb 04, modifications made to showpotential to address cumulative impacts

Page 2: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Using FRAGSTATS with SIMPPLLE output to provide quantification of landscape patterns.

SIMPPLLE

Three metrics selected for comparison purposes only

Page 3: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Fortine drainage – Kootenai National Forest approximately 25,000 acres

SIMPPLLE

Page 4: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Current landscape is the result of significant level of clearcutharvest systems.

SIMPPLLE

Page 5: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

How do Fragstats metrics of the current landscape compare towhat existed prior to harvests

What will be the metrics of a future landscape as a result ofthe harvesting and the continued application of fire suppression?

What are possible values of historic landscapes that includelevels of mountain pine beetle and fire processes?

SIMPPLLE

How different is the future landscape as described by themetrics from possible historic landscapes?

Would the metrics of a future landscape withoutthe harvesting (but with disturbance processes) be different?

Page 6: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Current size class convertedto a grid of 5 acre cells

Very largeMediumOpeningsLargepole

Page 7: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Future size classes from a50 year SIMPPLLE simulationwith harvest (5 acre cells)

Very largeMediumOpeningsLargepole

Page 8: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Preharvest size classes converted to 5 acre cells

Very largeMediumOpeningsLargepole

Page 9: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Preharvest size classes converted to 5 acre cells

Very largeMediumOpeningsLargepole

need to simulate forwardwithout harvest but withexpected natural processes

Page 10: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

average mpb in lp - pre harvest conditions

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1 2 3 4 5

decade

ac

res smpb

lmpb

average mpb in lp - current conditions

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1 2 3 4 5

decades

ac

res smpb

lmpb

Simulated mpb activitythat would have occurredwithout harvesting

Simulated mpb activitythat has occurredwith harvesting.

Page 11: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

srf average - preharvest conditions

050

100150200250

300350400

450500

1 2 3 4 5

decade

ac

res

average -srf current landscape

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1 2 3 4 5

Simulated stand replacing firewith harvest.

Simulated stand replacing firewithout harvest – but with firesuppression. Modeling of firesuppression may be too effective so ---

Page 12: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

srf average - preharvest conditions

050

100150200250

300350400

450500

1 2 3 4 5

decade

ac

res

average -srf current landscape

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1 2 3 4 5

pre-harvest without suppression

0500

1000150020002500300035004000

1 2 3 4 5

decade

acre

w

STAND-REPLACING-FIRE

LIGHT-SEVERITY-FIRE

MIXED-SEVERITY-FIRE

Simulation of fire without suppression showing impactof mpb activity without harvest on the fire processes

Page 13: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

Three historic size classesfrom SIMPPLLE simulations

Very largeMediumOpeningsLargepole

Created historic starting with preharvest conditions

Page 14: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

FRAGSTATS LANDSCAPE METRIC - SHAPE_RA

0

2

4

6

8

curre

nt

futu

re (5

0 ye

ars)

preh

arve

st

histo

ric -

1

histo

ric -

2

histo

ric -3

ind

ex v

alu

e

The “shape range” metric for the entire landscape of thecurrent and future fall well below that of any simulated historic landscape. The trend from the current to the future is for a continued decrease.

SIMPPLLE

Would need to addwhat the current anda future would be withoutthe past harvest

With harvest

Page 15: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

FRAGSTATS CLASS METRICS - OPENINGS SHAPE_RA

01234

curr

ent

futu

re (

50ye

ars)

preh

arve

st

hist

oric

-1

hist

oric

-2

hist

oric

-3

ind

ex v

alu

e

SIMPPLLE

The harvesting created a class metric for “shape range” greaterthan any simulated historic value. However the future trend is for a rapid decrease below any simulated historic value.

With harvestWould need to addwhat the current anda future would be withoutthe past harvest

Page 16: Using SIMPPLLE to address questions: Has our management altered how a landscape is developing? How would a landscape have changed without our actions?

FRAGSTATS CLASS METRICS - OPENINGS AREA_RA

0200400600800

curr

ent

futu

re (

50ye

ars)

preh

arve

st

hist

oric

-1

hist

oric

-2

hist

oric

-3

ind

ex v

alu

e

SIMPPLLE

The harvesting created a class metric for “area range” greaterthan any simulated historic value. However the future trend is for a rapid decrease below any simulated historic value.

With harvest

Would need to addwhat the current anda future would be withoutthe past harvest