Using sheep to control Brachypodium sylvaticum- an invasive weed Ryan Scholz- Senior; Animal Sciences/ Bioresource Research Dr. Howard Meyer- Professor; OSU Dept. Animal Sciences
Using sheep to control Brachypodium sylvaticum- an
invasive weed
Ryan Scholz-Senior; Animal Sciences/ Bioresource
Research
Dr. Howard Meyer-Professor; OSU Dept. Animal Sciences
Slender False Brome
• Brachypodium sylvaticum– Native to Europe, Asia,
Africa– “Class B” Invasive Species
• First reported as naturalized in 1939 near Eugene, OR
• Widespread in Western Oregon
• Recently discovered in Josephine County and Northern California
Background
• B. sylvaticum (cont.)– Habitat
• Common in shaded forest understories
• Gradually moves into un-shaded regions
• Out-competes many native plants
Background
• Control– Spray
• Accord ® (Glyphosate)
• Velpar® (Hexazinone)
– Super-heated foam• Waipuna machine
– Mechanical Removal– Burning/ mowing
• Appears to be ineffective
Background
• Control (cont.)– Grazing
• Relatively low palatability
• Observations indicate grazing can be effective
• Studies are underway to learn more
Grazed Un-Grazed
Research Timeline
• Pasture Study – 2004/2005– Confinement Trial– Pasture Trial
• Orphan Study – 2005• Seed Viability Study – 2005/2006/2007
– In situ– In vitro– In vivo
Pasture Study - 2004/2005
Experimental Design
• Pre-Trial Training– Treatment- Grazed on B.
sylvaticum– Control- Grazed on
standard pasture– All lambs grazed for 3
week training period• First 2 weeks with
mothers
• Third week after weaning
• Study repeated 2005
Confinement Feeding
Pasture Study – 2004/2005
Experimental Design
• Confinement Feeding Trial- wether lambs– Lambs from pasture
training– To determine their
willingness to eat B. sylvaticum after training
– Offered fresh cut B. sylvaticum after overnight fast
Confinement Feeding Trial
• Procedure– Lambs removed from fields at 4:00pm and housed
in barn overnight– Individually penned lambs offered 250g fresh cut B.
sylvaticum at 10:00am• Lambs allowed to eat for 30 minutes• Uneaten B. sylvaticum collected and weighed
Confinement Feeding Trial
• Procedure (cont)– Lambs held off feed
overnight; test repeated following morning
• Conducted immediately following training and again one month later
Data- 2004
Exposure 1 Exposure 2
Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 1
Treatment 116g 152g 176g 232g
Control 78g 119g 145g 140g
Data- 2005
Exposure 1 Exposure 2
Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2
Treatment 72g 64g 87g 87g
Control 64g 75g 56g 58g
Results
• Exposure was effective– Treatment lambs
consumed more (P<.05)– Effects still present one
month later (P<.05)– Conditioning effect
observed in control lambs (P<.05)
Treatment
Control
Pasture Grazing
Pasture Study – 2004/2005
Experimental Design
• Pasture Grazing Trial- ewe lambs– To measure:
• Relative preference in a pasture setting
• Continued preference over extended period of time
– Grazed plots located in dense stands of B. sylvaticum
Pasture Grazing Trial
• Procedure– Four 100m2 B. sylvaticum plots enclosed with
temporary electric fence– Four 1m2 clippings taken from each plot before and
after grazing– Sheep grazed on two plots over 2 consecutive days
Data
2004 2005
Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2
Treatment 62g 83g 106g 70g
Control 21g 14g 42g 11
Results
• Observations and Results indicate training to be effective– Treatment lambs
appeared to spend more time grazing
– Treatment lambs consumed more B. sylvaticum (P<.05)
Orphan Lamb Study
Hypothesis
• Artificially reared lambs exposed to B. sylvaticum juice as an additive in milk will have an increased affinity for B. sylvaticum as adults when compared to unexposed sheep.
Experimental Design
• 24 orphan lambs reared on milk replacer– Born via caesarian
2/14/05– 12 treatment lambs
given B. sylvaticum juice in milk for 14 days (d. 21-35)
– Confinement feeding trial during summer
Data
Exposure 1 Exposure 2
Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2
Treatment 28g 50g 78g 59g
Control 16g 35g 53g 69g
Results
• No significant difference– All lambs showed
aversion to B. sylvaticum on first exposure (compared to Pasture Training)(P<.05)
– No Difference between treatment groups (P>.05)
– Control adjusted to B. sylvaticum faster than treatment (P<.05)
Seed Viability Study
Hypothetical Problem
• Sheep utilized to control B. sylvaticum– Graze plant in later
summer– Ingest viable seed
• Animals moved from B. sylvaticum to “clean” field– B. sylvaticum seed
excreted in feces– Potential for spread of B.
sylvaticum
Hypothesis
• B. sylvaticum and L. multiflorum Lam. (perennial ryegrass) seeds which are digested by sheep will have decreased germination rates when compared to undigested seed.
Experimental Design
• 4 sheep were ruminally cannulated
• B. sylvaticum seed was collected in late summer
• L. multiflorum Lam. seed used as comparison
• In sacco, in vitro, in vivo digestion techniques used
• Seed viability will be determined at OSU Seed Lab
In sacco trial
Seed Viability Study
In sacco Trial
• 3.0g seed in Dacron digestion bags
• Placed in rumen for 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
• Samples washed and dried following digestion
• Weights obtained to determine amount of digestion
Data- in sacco
Results
• Both species lost ~4% in first 3 hours– B. sylvaticum steadily
increased to 7.5% by 72 hours
– L. multiflorum Lam. steadily increased to 7.5% by 24 hours, jumped to 11% and plateaued by 48 hours
In sacco trial
Seed Viability Study
In vitro Trial
• 1000mL rumen fluid collected from 4 sheep• Samples digested in 35°C rumen fluid for 24 or
48 hours– 90ml rumen fluid mixed with 10ml McDougal’s
Buffer– 0.25g seed + 0.25 substrate
• NDF used to estimate post-ruminal digestion
Data- in vitro
Results
• Significant difference (p<0.05)– Digestion times for B. sylvaticum and L. multiflorum
Lam. with like substrates– Like digestion times for L. multiflorum with like
substrate and B. sylvaticum substrate– Like digestion times for L. multiflorum Lam. with
and without post-ruminal digestion
Results
• No significant difference (p>0.05)– 24h and 48h digestion of L. multiflorum Lam. seeds
with B. sylvaticum substrate– 24h and 48h digestion of L. multiflorum Lam. seeds
with post-ruminal digestion
Discussion
• Current results are promising but have limited application– Show digestion of seed– Effect of digestion on
viability to be determined (work in progress)
Big Picture
• Pre-weaning training with mothers is effective (P<.05)• Incorporation of juice in milk was not effective <P>.05)
– Very expensive and time consuming– Possibly needed longer exposure time– May have created an aversion
• Seed digestion results inconclusive – awaiting germination results– Sheep should be held off of “clean” pasture for a minimum of
72 hours following grazing B. sylvaticum in seed
Questions
Special thanks to:
• Dr. Howard Meyer• Dr. Deborah Clark• Nichole Scholz• Tom Nichols• Mark Keller• Dr. Mike Gamroth• Joel Haas• Dave Bohnert• Wanda Crannell• Dr. Morrie Craig
• OSU Dept. Animal Sciences
• OSU Research Office- URISC Grant
• Howard Hughes Medical Institute- Summer Fellowship Program
• OSU Seed Lab- Dale Brown
• OSU Seed Extension Office- Tom Silverstein